ContextPsychoanalysis has been criticized for fostering an understanding of the human being based on a majoritarian norm while overlooking alternative sex, gender, class, and race experiences. ObjectivesMy goal in this article is to lay the foundations for an inclusive, non-axiological, and non-hegemonic metapsychology, disencumbered of male biopower and heterocentrism. I therefore hope to contribute to restoring the intrinsically subversive nature of psychoanalysis, which was compromised by its institutionalization and historical situatedness. MethodI focus on the gender paradigm by proposing an archaeology of Jean Laplanche's texts from 1973 to 2003. This approach is enhanced by the contributions of feminist studies, queer theory, and contemporary American psychoanalysts informed by the social sciences. ResultsI delineate the primitive acknowledgement of gender difference based on a diversity of anatomical, psychological, and sociocultural features, which I distinguish from the perceptive of sexual difference governed by a binary logic specific to the urges of the phallic phase and marked by the influence of primary caregivers driven by a sexual unconscious and their social inscription. The plurality of gender expressions, as a challenge to contemporary clinical work, is thus understood to result from complex interactions between the following: the enigmatic gender assignments primarily implanted into the child's body ego by a constellation of libidinally invested and socially inserted adults; perceptual genital difference between the sexes; the multitude of messages vertically and horizontally received by the subject in the course of their life; the translation of all these experiences in accordance with the subject's idiosyncratic particularities; and, finally, their perpetual retranslation under the sway of afterwardness with the assistance of socially and culturally situated hermeneutic grids. My epistemological proposal in this kaleidoscopic framework is that of a primary queer sexuality, secondarily transformed into a less inclusive psychic bisexuality through the introjection of the culturally prevalent gender binary. Moreover, I consider the hierarchical relations in regard to identity categories as enigmatic messages “to be translated”, inculcated in the child's psyche by adult bearers of powerful binary norms (masculine/feminine, dominant/submissive, normal/perverse). By means of this intergenerational transmission, gender, sexual, class, and race ideals are likely to perpetuate and thus consolidate the “normative unconscious” formed from the identifications that are refused because of their social non-conformity. Finally, I will show the heuristic importance of the over-inclusive model of enigmatic signifiers, which I propose in this article, by studying a material stemming from various sources: personal clinical practice, novels, films, autobiographical narratives, field investigations. The guiding thread of this heterogeneous corpus is the experience of subjectivities situated in the margins, likely to shed light on the mechanisms that govern the centre. ConclusionsTheoretical constructions are likely to generate effects inside and outside the analytic space due to the performative power of language: hence, the importance for analysts to challenge the ideal of pure neutrality by recognizing the potential infiltration of their theories by their own infantile sexuality as well as institutional, social, and cultural norms. The scope of a metapsychology of gender open to diversity is simultaneously clinical, epistemological, and political.