BackgroundWe have reported that perioperative and preoperative immunonutrition reduced infectious complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy; however, it is unclear whether perioperative immunonutrition has additional effects compared with preoperative immunonutrition. The present study evaluated whether perioperative, compared with preoperative, immunonutrition has additional effects on cell-mediated immunity and the infection rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Materials and methodsThis was a prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted in our institution. Oral supplementation enriched with arginine, ω-3 fatty acids, and dietary nucleotides was given by enteral infusion to 30 patients before and after surgery (perioperative group); 30 patients received the same enriched formula before surgery and standard enteral nutrition following surgery (preoperative group). The primary endpoint was concanavalin (Con A)- or phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation on postoperative day (POD) 7, which is an index of cell-mediated immunity; the secondary endpoint was the postoperative infection rate. ResultsThere were no significant differences in Con A- or PHA-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation on POD 7 between the groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative infection rate between the two groups. In the post hoc subgroup analysis, with respect to the effect on the infection rate, a significant interaction was found only between a long operative time and perioperative immunonutrition. ConclusionsThere were no additional effects of perioperative, compared with preoperative, immunonutrition on postoperative immunity and infectious complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.