pH-metry Results Research Articles

Reflux Symptom and Sign Instrument: A New Instrument to Diagnose Pediatric Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Abstract Introduction: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is commonly found in children, usually connected to airway problems. LPR remains controversial as no standardized diagnostic instrument. Diagnostic tools available have been validated mostly in adults, i.e. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS). Objective: The objective of the study was to obtain a cost-effective, simple, convenient, noninvasive instrument with good diagnostic outcome. Methods: We compared RSI and RFS with esophageal double probe 24-h pHmetry results. A total of 29 children were recruited, aged 5–18 years. The inclusion criterion was phlegmy throat, frequent odynophagia, sensation of a lump in the throat, throat clearing, choking episodes, hoarseness, and chronic cough for at least 4 weeks. The subjects underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy and pHmetry insertion. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using three scenarios. Results: The Reflux Symptoms-Sign Instruments (RSII), consisting of frequent throat clearing, annoying cough, choking, vocal cords abnormalities, and subglottic edema has a cutoff score of 4 and demonstrated 75% sensitivity, 77% specificity, 80% PPV, and 71% NPV. Conclusions: The RSII has shown a good diagnostic result in diagnosing LPR in children.

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Revision for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Long Versus Short Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) may be associated with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The nature of this GERD remains unclear. This complication can be treated either with an additional enteroenterostomy without shortening of gastric pouch (long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (L-BPL-RYGB)) or revision to conventional short biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (S-BPL-RYGB). The objective of this study is to compare the aforementioned procedures in terms of efficacy on GERD symptoms. Retrospective analysis between October 2012 and June 2020. Fifty-two patients underwent OAGB revision to S-BPL-RYGB (n = 21) or L-BPL-RYGB (n = 31) secondary to GERD. Investigation with pH impedance prior to revision was performed in 15 patients showing biliary reflux (BR) in 7 (46.6%), acid reflux (AR) in 6 (40%), and no confirmation in 2. Patients with AR had a revision to S-BPL-RYGB, whereas patients with BR underwent L-BPL-RYGB. Among the patients without pH metry results (n = 37), S-BPL-RYGB was performed for associated disabling digestive disorders or nutritional deficiencies. GERD was treated in 68% of patients with L-BPL-RYGB versus 95% of patients after S-BPL-RYGB. Patients, whose decision for revisional procedure was based on the results of pH impedance testing, did not reveal refractory GERD. L-BPL-RYGB seems appropriate in patients with BR, whereas conversion to S-BPL-RYGB should be preferred if AR is present.

GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE IN INFANTS WHO PRESENTED BRIEF RESOLVED UNEXPLAINED EVENT (BRUE).

The term brief resolved unexplained events (BRUE) is a description of the acute event occurring in infants less than 1-year-old that includes at least one of the following characteristics: cyanosis or pallor; absent, decreased, or irregular breathing; marked change in tone or altered level of responsiveness. An investigative proceeding is required to identify the triggering phenomenon in those who are at high risk of complications. Prolonged esophageal pHmetry has been used as a tool in searching for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as one of the underlying etiologies. The study aims to verify the frequency of GERD in infants up to 1-year-old, when pHmetry has been performed for investigating high-risk BRUE (HR-BRUE) and to analyze if clinical characteristics or any particular symptom related by caregivers during BRUE could be correlated to GERD. It was performed a cross-sectional study. The data was collected retrospectively of patients less than 1-year-old, who had performed pHmetry in a tertiary hospital for investigating HR-BRUE between October 2008 and January 2018. For the analysis of medical records, a data collection protocol included: gender, age at the first HR-BRUE episode, age at the time of the pHmetry, gestational age, type of delivery (normal or caesarean) and birth weight and symptoms associated to HR-BRUE related by caregivers. Relation between variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test. The significance level was set at 0.05. A total of 54 infants were included (preterm 25, term 29), 62.9% males, median age at the HR-BRUE was 36 days, 53.7% HR-BRUE episodes had occurred during or right after feeding. According to pHmetry results: nine pHmetry results were considered inconclusive, physiological reflux (n=30) and GERD (n=15). The frequency of GERD diagnosed by pHmetry was 33%. GERD was not statistically related to gender (P-value=0.757), age at first HR-BRUE episode (P-value=0.960), age at the time of the pHmetry (P-value=0.720), prematurity (P-value=0.120) or type of delivery (P-value=0.738). GERD was statistically related to low birth weight (P-value=0.023). There was no association between symptoms reported by caregivers during HR-BRUE and GERD. GERD diagnosed by the pHmetry was found in one third of infants that experiencing a HR-BRUE, showing the importance of properly investigation. In half of infants BRUE occurred during or right after feeding. Besides low birth weight, it was not possible to select other data from the clinical history that suggest that these patients would be more likely to have GERD.

Esophageal Function Tests are Not Associated with Barium Swallow Findings in Advanced Lung Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal dysmotility are common in patients with advanced lung disease (ALD) and are associated with worse outcomes. Assessing esophageal function in these patients is relevant for determining pulmonary transplant eligibility and prognosticating post-transplant outcomes. Barium Swallow (BaS) is a non-invasive testing modality often performed as a complement to formal esophageal function tests (EFTs), but its role and clinical utility in this context is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationship between BaS and EFTs with high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-h ambulatory pH-metry in patients with ALD. We performed a retrospective study of 226 consecutive patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplantation at a single center. All patients underwent EFTs and BaS independent of clinical history or symptoms per institutional protocol. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to evaluate the relationship between EFTs and BaS. Mucosal, reflux and motility findings were categorized. Abnormal motility was reported in 133 (59%) patients by BaS and 99 (44%) by HRM, with a significant difference in the proportions of patients with abnormal studies (p < 0.01). There were 7 (26%) patients with abnormal barium tablet passage who had normal HRM. The sensitivity (35%) and specificity (77%) for detecting pathologic reflux with BaS was poor. Inducibility of reflux and barium column height were not associated with pH-metry results. No clinically significant luminal irregularities were identified. In conclusion, while BaS can non-invasively assess esophageal mucosa, its findings are not associated with EFTs in patients with ALD.

Correlation of sleep-disordered breathing and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a two-channel triple-sensor pHmetry catheter study.

To investigate the relationship between sleep-disordered breathing with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) using a two-channel triple-sensor pHmetry catheter. The study was carried out on a total of 34 people with complaints of snoring, witnessed apnea and daytime sleepiness. 24-h pH monitoring with a two-channel, triple-sensor antimony pH catheter was applied to individuals simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG) on the day they would sleep in the sleep laboratory. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) severity and reflux grade were compared with each other. Data obtained from PSG and pHmetry results were numerically compared with each other. The relationship between apnea, hypopnea, and arousal periods and reflux episodes was then examined by overlaying pHmetry graphics for each patient. A total of 34 individuals (18 males-52.9% and 16 females-47.1%), age ranging from 27 to 71years (mean 50.5 ± 11.0) participated in the study. GER was detected in 52.9% and LPR in 85.3% of the patients. In 35.3% of cases, pathologic GER was not observed despite LPR detection. No statistically significant relationship was found between the numerical values of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and arousal numbers and reflux parameters of individuals and between OSAS severity and LPR and GER (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between respiratory events and reflux episodes with regard to timing (p > 0.05). The prevalence of GER and LPR is found to be high in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. There is no significant relationship between OSAS severity and GER and LPR grade or respiratory events and reflux episodes with regard to timing.

Nocturnal and daytime esophageal acid exposure in normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients with reflux symptoms

This study aimed to investigate the association between BMI and esophageal acid exposure in a cohort of patients referred for esophageal pH monitoring. The contributing roles of hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and intragastric pressure (IGP) were investigated, with an emphasis on reflux in the supine position. Esophageal manometry and 24-h pH-metry results were extracted from a prospectively collected database, and supplemental data (body mass, endoscopy results) from patient files. In total, 245 patients (mean age 52.2±14 years, 54% men) were included in this study. In the normal-weight subgroup (n=87), the median acid exposure time was 1.1% [0-8.1] in the supine position (with interquartile range 25-75%) and 7.7% [2.5-14.8] in the upright position; the total acid exposure time was 7.4% [2.7-11.7]/24 h. In the overweight subgroup (n=104), the median acid exposure time was 4.9% [0.3-13.3] in the supine position and 11.1% [5.4-16.9] in the upright position; the total acid exposure time was 8.9% [4.7-15.8]/24 h. In the obesity subgroup (n=54), the median acid exposure time was 4.1% [0.7-14.3] in the supine position and 10.5% [5-17.5] in the upright position; the total acid exposure time was 8.3% [5.3-14.7]/24 h. Supine acid exposure was significantly higher in overweight and obese patients than in normal-weight patients (both P=0.02). In overweight patients, a hiatal hernia was predictive of supine and total acid exposure, as was a decreasing LES pressure in both the supine and the upright position. In obese patients, increased IGP contributed toward an increased total acid exposure. Although an association between increasing BMI and acid exposure was observed, BMI was not independently predictive. Overweight and obesity is associated with increased reflux, especially in the supine position. The most important factors that contribute toward reflux are the presence of a hiatal hernia and a lower LES pressure in overweight patients and an increased IGP in obese patients.

Dilated intercellular spaces in subtypes of gastroesophagic reflux disease

Dilatation of the intercellular spaces by electron microscopy has been considered as an early morphological marker of tissue injury in gastroesophageal reflux disease. The degree of dilatation in Barret's esophagus in currently unknown. To determine the frequency of dilated intervellular spaces in Barrett's esophagus. Cross-sectional and prospective analysis of consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. We selected symptomatic patients > 18 years and both sexes. Patients with recent PPI use (< 14 days), H-2 antagonists, NSAID's or previous upper GI tract surgery were excluded. VARIABLES INCLUDED: Clinical-demographic data, Carlsson-Dent score, conventional endoscopy findings, pH-metry results (in non-erosive) and normal mucosal biopsies at 2 and 5 cm above the squamocolumnar junction. Dilation of intercellular spaces was measured by electron microscopy. Chi square test with a significance level 0.05 was calculated. The following four groups were compared: a) non-erosive reflux disease (n = 14); b) erosive esophagitis (n = 5); c) Barrett's esophagus (n = 13); and d) healthy controls (n = 5). the dilation of intervellular spaces was increasingly greater form non-erosive revlux to Barrett's esophagus and higher in biopsies taken at 5 cm than at 2 cm of the squamous columnar junction (2.72 +/- 1.35 vs. 1.71 +/- 0.48 microg) (p = 0.001). There was no difference between biopsies at 2 and 5 cm in the order groups. dilation of intercellular spaces was greater in Barrett s esophagus than in the other groups and higher at 5 cm from the squamocolumnar junction.

Correlation between pathological distal esophageal acid exposure and ineffective esophageal motility

To assess the correlation between esophageal dysmotility, characterized as inefficient esophageal motility (IEM), and the presence of pathological acid reflux due to a structurally defective lower esophageal sphincter (LES), hiatus hernia. (HH), or esophagitis in patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). 311 patients referred for GERD diagnostic procedures in a gastroesopahgeal motility laboratory were included in the study. Patients underwent an interview regarding their clinical symptoms, upper endoscopy (UE), stationary esophageal manometry, and 24-h esophageal pH-metry. The following risk factors of patients in the negative pH-metry group were compared to those in the positive pH-metry group: IEM, defective LES, HH, and esophagitis. The association between IEM and positive pH-metry results was first assessed by means of univariate analysis and later determined with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Out of the total of 311 studied patients, 208 met the inclusion criteria; 88 had normal and 120 had positive pH-metry results. Univariate analysis revealed that the occurrence of IEM, defective LES, and HH was significantly greater in the positive pH-metry group. Following logistic regression analysis, the occurrence of IEM remained significantly greater in the positive pH-metry group. IEM is associated with the presence of abnormal acid reflux, as assessed by 24-h esophageal pH-metry, regardless of the presence of defective LES, HH, or esophagitis.

Psychological Factors in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Measured by SCL-90-R Questionnaire

An association between psychological factors and gastroesophageal reflux disease has been recognized. Psychological distress can influence the outcomes of the disease. To determine the existence of psychological factors in our gastroesophageal reflux disease sample, as well as determine their influence on the outcome of the disease and treatment response. A cross-sectional study was performed from February 2006 to December 2007. Patients referred to gastrointestinal specialists who reported symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were asked to fill out the SCL-90-R questionnaire. All underwent endoscopy and pH-metry studies. Fifty-five patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were analyzed. Subjects with reflux symptoms had higher scores compared to healthy controls on sommatization, obsessiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, being phobic, being psychotic, and the global index (P < 0.05). Patients with high frequency of symptoms and long duration of disease have increased psychological distress. There was no relationship among pH-metry results, endoscopy findings, and SCL-90-R scores. Psychosocial factors can predispose to gastroesophageal reflux disease. The SCL-90-R questionnaire can be useful in investigating psychological factors in those patients with unsuccessful outcome of the symptoms despite correct management.

Diagnóstico de reflujo gastroesofágico proximal en pacientes con trastornos respiratorios del sueño

The close relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and sleep-related breathing disorders allows the consideration of treatment with proton pump inhibitors as a feasible alternative for patients with snoring or mild to moderate sleep apnoea syndrome. Nevertheless, the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the proximal oesophagus must be identified objectively with a double channel oesophageal pH-metry. To identify clinical data allowing the selection of patients most likely to have proximal oesophageal reflux, and, therefore, candidates for oesophageal pH-metry. Between January 2004 and September 2006, 121 patients were prospectively included. In these patients, a nocturnal polysomnography and a 24 hour double channel pH-metry were performed on the same day. We compared statistically the clinical data, endoscopic examination of the upper airway and the pH-metry results. A good correlation was observed between the presence of symptoms suggesting pharyngo-laryngeal acid reflux and endoscopic examination of this area (P< .009). However, the comparison between clinical data and pH-metry results was not statistically significant. Clinical symptoms and endoscopic examination alone are not good tools to determine the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the pharynx, in this group of patients. Its presence must be ascertained by a double channel oesophageal pH-metry.

PH nasofaríngeo e refluxo gastroesofágico em crianças com doença respiratória crônica

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the nasopharyngeal pH (NasopH) in children with normal or abnormal pH-metry in two groups of patients: 1) children presenting gastroenterological symptoms; and 2) children with chronic respiratory symptoms. METHODS: From February 2004 to January 2005, all consecutive patients referred for 24-hour pH-metry and in whom gastroesophageal reflux disease was suspected were enrolled in a prospective study. They were assigned to four groups: gastroenterological symptoms with normal (A) or abnormal (B) pH-metries (GG), and chronic respiratory symptoms with normal (C) or abnormal (D) pH-metries (RG). NasopH was measured for 5 minutes, before the 24-hour test was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight pH-metry tests were included (20 in the RG and 18 in the GG). Abnormal pH-metry results were observed in 11 patients in the GG and in 12 in the RG. NasopH means were 6.3273 and 5.6917, respectively (p < 0.0001). Average nasopharyngeal pH was 5.6917 among the 12 RG patients with abnormal pH-metry results and 6.5000 among the remaining eight patients with normal test results (p = 0.0006). Analysis of the RG with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed pH of 5.8 as cutoff point (sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 87.5%). The area below the ROC curve was 0.870. CONCLUSIONS: Nasopharyngeal pH is significantly lower among patients in the RG presenting abnormal pH-metry results. A 5.8 NasopH has good sensitivity and specificity and can be used as a screening test in patients with chronic respiratory diseases to select those for whom conventional 24-hour pH-metry is indicated.

Nasopharyngeal pH and gastroesophageal reflux in children with chronic respiratory disease

The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the nasopharyngeal pH (NasopH) in children with normal or abnormal pH-metry in two groups of patients; 1) children presenting gastroenterological symptoms; and 2) children with chronic respiratory symptoms. From February 2004 to January 2005, all consecutive patients referred for 24-hour pH-metry and in whom gastroesophageal reflux disease was suspected were enrolled in a prospective study. They were assigned to four groups: gastroenterological symptoms with normal (A) or abnormal (B) pH-metries (GG), and chronic respiratory symptoms with normal (C) or abnormal (D) pH-metries (RG). NasopH was measured for 5 minutes, before the 24-hour test was performed. Thirty-eight pH-metry tests were included (20 in the RG and 18 in the GG). Abnormal pH-metry results were observed in 11 patients in the GG and in 12 in the RG. NasopH means were 6.3273 and 5.6917, respectively (p<0.0001). Average nasopharyngeal pH was 5.6917 among the 12 RG patients with abnormal pH-metry results and 6.5000 among the remaining eight patients with normal test results (p=0.0006). Analysis of the RG with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed pH of 5.8 as cutoff point (sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 87.5%). The area below the ROC curve was 0.870. Nasopharyngeal pH is significantly lower among patients in the RG presenting abnormal pH-metry results. A 5.8 NasopH has good sensitivity and specificity and can be used as a screening test in patients with chronic respiratory diseases to select those for whom conventional 24-hour pH-metry is indicated.

Magnification Endoscopy in Non Erosive Reflux Disease. It Is Right Classify?

Backgrounds: Non Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD) is a group of heterogeneous alterations that present typical symptoms of gastroesophagic reflux like heartburn, regurgitation or both, in absence of visible injuries by endoscopy. Cromoendoscopy and magnification endoscopy can detect non observed erosions with conventional endoscopy and classify correctly the patients. Objectives: To establish if the magnification endoscopy with cromoendoscopy can identify non observed erosions by conventional endoscopy in patients with NERD. Material and Methods: It's a prospective, transversal, comparative and descriptive study. They included both sex patients, age 18-75 years, with NERD. It was applied Carlsson-Dent questionnaire, was made conventional endoscopy and was classified like NERD or erosive esofagitis, patients without erosions, was made cromoscopy with lugol and magnification to re-classify them like NERD or erosive disease. The observations were made for a single endoscopist. Statistical Analysis: It was applied “t” student test to compare both groups, it was considered statistically significant with p < 0.05. It was made Kappa test to agreement for Inter and intraobserver and between conventional and magnification endoscopy. Results: A total of 8 and 8 patients in the study and control group respectively were included. It was not observe significant diferences in demographic characteristics. There was a sensivity of 100%, especificity 50%, positive predictive value 66% and negative predictive value of 100% for Carlsson-Dent test. It was observe a change in the proportion erosive-non-erosive esofagitis, 37.5% erosive and 62.5% NERD with conventional endoscopy and 68.75% erosives and 31.25% NERD with magnification endoscopy. The NERD predomine in female patients in both groups.. It wasn't significant diference between both groups in pH-metry results. The interobserver and itraobserver agreement Kappa test was 0.52 IC 95% (0.116-0.913) and 0.625 IC 95% (0.2427-1.0073) respectively. The agreement between conventional and magnification study was Kappa 0.42 IC 95% (0.03-0.89). Conclusions: The use of magnification endoscopy can identify non seen erosions with conventional endoscopy in NERD patients and then with base in a better cassification of them, decide the best treatment for each patient. It is necessary increase the sample size to obtain statistical significant diference between groups and propose characteristics of magnification endoscopy erosions images.

Diagnosis of Proximal Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux in Patients With Rhonchopathy and Sleep Apnoea

The close relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and sleep-related breathing disorders allows the consideration of treatment with proton pump inhibitors as a feasible alternative for patients with snoring or mild to moderate sleep apnoea syndrome. Nevertheless, the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the proximal oesophagus must be identified objectively with a double channel oesophageal pH-metry.To identify clinical data allowing the selection of patients most likely to have proximal oesophageal reflux, and, therefore, candidates for oesophageal pH-metry.Between January 2004 and September 2006, 121 patients were prospectively included. In these patients, a nocturnal polysomnography and a 24 hour double channel pH-metry were performed on the same day. We compared statistically the clinical data, endoscopic examination of the upper airway and the pH-metry results.A good correlation was observed between the presence of symptoms suggesting pharyngo-laryngeal acid reflux and endoscopic examination of this area (P< .009). However, the comparison between clinical data and pH-metry results was not statistically significant.Clinical symptoms and endoscopic examination alone are not good tools to determine the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the pharynx, in this group of patients. Its presence must be ascertained by a double channel oesophageal pH-metry.

Is There a Relationship Between the pH and Volume of Saliva and Esophageal pH-metry Results?

There are several implications in the buffer capacity and in the protective role of saliva in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and other digestive disorders. The lack of knowledge about the production and quality of saliva and the fact that saliva plays an important role in digestive homeostasis motivated the authors to study the relationship between reflux measured by esophageal pH-metry and the pH and volume of saliva in individuals with GERD and its laryngopharyngeal manifestations (LPR). The study was designed as a randomized clinical trial. The studied population consisted of 39 adults with GERD and LPR confirmed by a positive 24-hour double-probe esophageal pH-metry. Unstimulated whole saliva was collected and its pH and volume were compared to pH-metry results. Patients were divided into four groups according to the number of distal episodes of reflux and two groups according to the presence or absence of proximal reflux. A highly significant difference was found between the groups with distal reflux when comparing salivary volume alone and salivary volume/salivary pH. The same occurred for the presence or absence of proximal reflux. These results suggest a direct correlation between salivary volume and "salivary pH x volume" with the number of distal and proximal episodes of reflux on the esophageal pH-metry. If larger studies confirm this finding, in the future it might be possible to diagnose GERD and LPR through a simple "spit test," avoiding more costly and invasive procedures.

Effect of smoking on the results of esophageal pH measurement in clinical routine.

Because data on the effects of smoking on gastroesophageal reflux are controversial, we evaluated the effect of smoking on the results of esophageal 24-hour pH-metry in clinical routine. Participants were 280 consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of reflux disease, 78 smokers, and 202 nonsmokers. Of the smokers, 45 actually smoked during the pH measurement and 33 abstained from smoking. The frequency of reflux episodes, the fraction of time pH was < 4, and the percentage of abnormal 24-hour pH-metry results were compared among actual smokers, abstaining smokers, and nonsmokers. In actual smokers, the effect of smoking on gastroesophageal reflux was further analyzed by comparing the reflux frequency and the fraction of time that pH was < 4 for a 10-minute period before, during, and after smoking. We found no difference in reflux frequency and fraction of time that pH was < 4 among actual smokers, abstaining smokers, and nonsmokers, regardless of a normal or an abnormal pH-metry result. The percentage of patients with a pH-metry result indicating disease was similar in the three groups, at 53%, 52%, and 50%, respectively. Gastroesophageal reflux was not increased during smoking a cigarette or in the postsmoking period compared with the presmoking period. Neither being a smoker nor actually smoking a cigarette had a negative influence on gastroesophageal reflux. Thus smoking or abstaining from smoking does not modify the results of pH-metry in clinical routine.