PET Motion Correction Research Articles

Inter-pass motion correction for whole-body dynamic PET and parametric imaging.

Whole-body dynamic FDG-PET imaging through continuous-bed-motion (CBM) mode multi-pass acquisition protocol is a promising metabolism measurement. However, inter-pass misalignment originating from body movement could degrade parametric quantification. We aim to apply a non-rigid registration method for inter-pass motion correction in whole-body dynamic PET. 27 subjects underwent a 90-min whole-body FDG CBM PET scan on a Biograph mCT (Siemens Healthineers), acquiring 9 over-the-heart single-bed passes and subsequently 19 CBM passes (frames). The inter-pass motion correction was executed using non-rigid image registration with multi-resolution, B-spline free-form deformations. The parametric images were then generated by Patlak analysis. The overlaid Patlak slope Ki and y-intercept Vb images were visualized to qualitatively evaluate motion impact and correction effect. The normalized weighted mean squared Patlak fitting errors (NFE) were compared in the whole body, head, and hypermetabolic regions of interest (ROI). In Ki images, ROI statistics were collected and malignancy discrimination capacity was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). After the inter-pass motion correction was applied, the spatial misalignment appearance between Ki and Vb images was successfully reduced. Voxel-wise normalized fitting error maps showed global error reduction after motion correction. The NFE in the whole body (p = 0.0013), head (p = 0.0021), and ROIs (p = 0.0377) significantly decreased. The visual performance of each hypermetabolic ROI in Ki images was enhanced, while 3.59% and 3.67% average absolute percentage changes were observed in mean and maximum Ki values, respectively, across all evaluated ROIs. The estimated mean Ki values had substantial changes with motion correction (p = 0.0021). The AUC of both mean Ki and maximum Ki after motion correction increased, possibly suggesting the potential of enhancing oncological discrimination capacity through inter-pass motion correction.

Respiratory motion correction in F-18-FDG PET/CT impacts lymph node assessment in lung cancer patients

BackgroundsElastic motion correction in PET has been shown to increase image quality and quantitative measurements of PET datasets affected by respiratory motion. However, little is known on the impact of respiratory motion correction on clinical image evaluation in oncologic PET. This study evaluated the impact of motion correction on expert readers’ lymph node assessment of lung cancer patients.MethodsForty-three patients undergoing F-18-FDG PET/CT for the staging of suspected lung cancer were included. Three different PET reconstructions were investigated: non-motion-corrected (“static”), belt gating-based motion-corrected (“BG-MC”) and data-driven gating-based motion-corrected (“DDG-MC”). Assessment was conducted independently by two nuclear medicine specialists blinded to the reconstruction method on a six-point scale s ranging from “certainly negative” (1) to “certainly positive” (6). Differences in s between reconstruction methods, accounting for variation caused by readers, were assessed by nonparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data. From s, a dichotomous score for N1, N2, and N3 (“negative,” “positive”) and a subjective certainty score were derived. SUV and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were compared between reconstruction methods.ResultsBG-MC resulted in higher scores for N1 compared to static (p = 0.001), whereas DDG-MC resulted in higher scores for N2 compared to static (p = 0.016). Motion correction resulted in the migration of N1 from tumor free to metastatic on the dichotomized score, consensually for both readers, in 3/43 cases and in 2 cases for N2. SUV was significantly higher for motion-corrected PET, while MTV was significantly lower (all p < 0.003). No significant differences in the certainty scores were noted.ConclusionsPET motion correction resulted in significantly higher lymph node assessment scores of expert readers. Significant effects on quantitative PET parameters were seen; however, subjective reader certainty was not improved.

Data-driven head motion correction for PET using time-of-flight and positron emission particle tracking techniques.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is susceptible to patient movement during a scan. Head motion is a continuing problem for brain PET imaging and diagnostic assessments. Physical head restraints and external motion tracking systems are most commonly used to address to this issue. Data-driven methods offer substantial advantages, such as retroactive processing but typically require manual interaction for robustness. In this work, we introduce a time-of-flight (TOF) weighted positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) algorithm that facilitates fully automated, data-driven head motion detection and subsequent automated correction of the raw listmode data. We used our previously published TOF-PEPT algorithm Dustin Osborne et al. (2017), Tasmia Rahman Tumpa et al., Tasmia Rahman Tumpa et al. (2021) to automatically identify frames where the patient was near-motionless. The first such static frame was used as a reference to which subsequent static frames were registered. The underlying rigid transformations were estimated using weak radioactive point sources placed on radiolucent glasses worn by the patient. Correction of raw event data were achieved by tracking the point sources in the listmode data which was then repositioned to allow reconstruction of a single image. To create a "gold standard" for comparison purposes, frame-by-frame image registration based correction was implemented. The original listmode data was used to reconstruct an image for each static frame detected by our algorithm and then applying manual landmark registration and external software to merge these into a single image. We report on five patient studies. The TOF-PEPT algorithm was configured to detect motion using a 500 ms window. Our event-based correction produced images that were visually free of motion artifacts. Comparison of our algorithm to a frame-based image registration approach produced results that were nearly indistinguishable. Quantitatively, Jaccard similarity indices were found to be in the range of 85-98% for the former and 84-98% for the latter when comparing the static frame images with the reference frame counterparts. We have presented a fully automated data-driven method for motion detection and correction of raw listmode data. Easy to implement, the approach achieved high temporal resolution and reliable performance for head motion correction. Our methodology provides a mechanism by which patient motion incurred during imaging can be assessed and corrected post hoc.

Unsupervised inter-frame motion correction for whole-body dynamic PET using convolutional long short-term memory in a convolutional neural network.

Subject motion in whole-body dynamic PET introduces inter-frame mismatch and seriously impacts parametric imaging. Traditional non-rigid registration methods are generally computationally intense and time-consuming. Deep learning approaches are promising in achieving high accuracy with fast speed, but have yet been investigated with consideration for tracer distribution changes or in the whole-body scope. In this work, we developed an unsupervised automatic deep learning-based framework to correct inter-frame body motion. The motion estimation network is a convolutional neural network with a combined convolutional long short-term memory layer, fully utilizing dynamic temporal features and spatial information. Our dataset contains 27 subjects each under a 90-min FDG whole-body dynamic PET scan. Evaluating performance in motion simulation studies and a 9-fold cross-validation on the human subject dataset, compared with both traditional and deep learning baselines, we demonstrated that the proposed network achieved the lowest motion prediction error, obtained superior performance in enhanced qualitative and quantitative spatial alignment between parametric Ki and Vb images, and significantly reduced parametric fitting error. We also showed the potential of the proposed motion correction method for impacting downstream analysis of the estimated parametric images, improving the ability to distinguish malignant from benign hypermetabolic regions of interest. Once trained, the motion estimation inference time of our proposed network was around 460 times faster than the conventional registration baseline, showing its potential to be easily applied in clinical settings.

Brain PET motion correction using 3D face-shape model: the first clinical study

ObjectiveHead motions during brain PET scan cause degradation of brain images, but head fixation or external-maker attachment become burdensome on patients. Therefore, we have developed a motion correction method that uses a 3D face-shape model generated by a range-sensing camera (Kinect) and by CT images. We have successfully corrected the PET images of a moving mannequin-head phantom containing radioactivity. Here, we conducted a volunteer study to verify the effectiveness of our method for clinical data.MethodsEight healthy men volunteers aged 22–45 years underwent a 10-min head-fixed PET scan as a standard of truth in this study, which was started 45 min after 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (285 ± 23 MBq) injection, and followed by a 15-min head-moving PET scan with the developed Kinect based motion-tracking system. First, selecting a motion-less period of the head-moving PET scan provided a reference PET image. Second, CT images separately obtained on the same day were registered to the reference PET image, and create a 3D face-shape model, then, to which Kinect-based 3D face-shape model matched. This matching parameter was used for spatial calibration between the Kinect and the PET system. This calibration parameter and the motion-tracking of the 3D face shape by Kinect comprised our motion correction method. The head-moving PET with motion correction was compared with the head-fixed PET images visually and by standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) in the seven volume-of-interest regions. To confirm the spatial calibration accuracy, a test–retest experiment was performed by repeating the head-moving PET with motion correction twice where the volunteer’s pose and the sensor’s position were different.ResultsNo difference was identified visually and statistically in SUVRs between the head-moving PET images with motion correction and the head-fixed PET images. One of the small nuclei, the inferior colliculus, was identified in the head-fixed PET images and in the head-moving PET images with motion correction, but not in those without motion correction. In the test–retest experiment, the SUVRs were well correlated (determinant coefficient, r2 = 0.995).ConclusionOur motion correction method provided good accuracy for the volunteer data which suggested it is useable in clinical settings.

Automatic Inter-Frame Patient Motion Correction for Dynamic Cardiac PET Using Deep Learning

Patient motion during dynamic PET imaging can induce errors in myocardial blood flow (MBF) estimation. Motion correction for dynamic cardiac PET is challenging because the rapid tracer kinetics of 82Rb leads to substantial tracer distribution change across different dynamic frames over time, which can cause difficulties for image registration-based motion correction, particularly for early dynamic frames. In this paper, we developed an automatic deep learning-based motion correction (DeepMC) method for dynamic cardiac PET. In this study we focused on the detection and correction of inter-frame rigid translational motion caused by voluntary body movement and pattern change of respiratory motion. A bidirectional-3D LSTM network was developed to fully utilize both local and nonlocal temporal information in the 4D dynamic image data for motion detection. The network was trained and evaluated over motion-free patient scans with simulated motion so that the motion ground-truths are available, where one million samples based on 65 patient scans were used in training, and 600 samples based on 20 patient scans were used in evaluation. The proposed method was also evaluated using additional 10 patient datasets with real motion. We demonstrated that the proposed DeepMC obtained superior performance compared to conventional registration-based methods and other convolutional neural networks (CNN), in terms of motion estimation and MBF quantification accuracy. Once trained, DeepMC is much faster than the registration-based methods and can be easily integrated into the clinical workflow. In the future work, additional investigation is needed to evaluate this approach in a clinical context with realistic patient motion.

Assessment of motion correction in dynamic rubidium-82 cardiac PET with and without frame-by-frame adjustment of attenuation maps for calculation of myocardial blood flow

BackgroundPatient motion during pharmacological stressing can have substantial impact on myocardial blood flow (MBF) estimated from dynamic PET. This work evaluated a motion correction algorithm with and without adjustment of the PET attenuation map. MethodsFrame-by-frame motion correction was performed by three users on 30 rubidium-82 studies. Data were divided equally into three groups of motion severity [mild (M1), moderate (M2) and severe (M3)]. MBF data were compared for non-motion corrected (NC), motion-corrected-only (MC) and with adjustment of the attenuation map (MCAC). Percentage differences of MBF were calculated in the coronary territories and 17-segment polar plots. Polar plots of spill-over were also generated from the data. ResultsMedian differences of 23% were seen in the RCA and 18% for the LAD in the M3 category for MC vs NC images. Differences for MCAC vs MC images were considerably smaller and typically < 10%. Spill-over plots for MC and MCAC were notably more uniform compared with NC images. ConclusionMotion correction for dynamic rubidium data is desirable for future MBF software updates. Adjustment of the PET attenuation map results in only marginal differences and therefore is unlikely to be an essential requirement. Assessing the uniformity of spill-over plots is a useful visual aid for verifying motion correction techniques.

Impact of PET data driven respiratory motion correction and BSREM reconstruction of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for differentiating neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and intrapancreatic accessory spleens (IPAS)

To evaluate whether quantitative PET parameters of motion-corrected 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT can differentiate between intrapancreatic accessory spleens (IPAS) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). A total of 498 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) who underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT between March 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects with accessory spleens (n = 43, thereof 7 IPAS) and pNET (n = 9) were included, resulting in a total of 45 scans. PET images were reconstructed using ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) and a fully convergent iterative image reconstruction algorithm with β-values of 1000 (BSREM1000). A data-driven gating (DDG) technique (MOTIONFREE, GE Healthcare) was applied to extract respiratory triggers and use them for PET motion correction within both reconstructions. PET parameters among different samples were compared using non-parametric tests. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyzed the ability of PET parameters to differentiate IPAS and pNETs. SUVmax was able to distinguish pNET from accessory spleens and IPAs in BSREM1000 reconstructions (p < 0.05). This result was more reliable using DDG-based motion correction (p < 0.003) and was achieved in both OSEM and BSREM1000 reconstructions. For differentiating accessory spleens and pNETs with specificity 100%, the ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.742 (sensitivity 56%)/0.765 (sensitivity 56%)/0.846 (sensitivity 62%)/0.840 (sensitivity 63%) for SUVmax 36.7/41.9/36.9/41.7 in OSEM/BSREM1000/OSEM + DDG/BSREM1000 + DDG, respectively. BSREM1000 + DDG can accurately differentiate pNET from accessory spleen. Both BSREM1000 and DDG lead to a significant SUV increase compared to OSEM and non-motion-corrected data.

Data-Driven Respiratory Motion Correction in Clinical PET - A Turning Point.

REPLY: Dr. Kesner’s letter regarding our recent publication ([1][1]) raises several useful points. We wholeheartedly agree that data-driven gating is an important innovation. Indeed, the launch of a commercial implementation provides an opportunity for celebration of this success and for

Data-driven motion correction in clinical PET - a joint accomplishment of creative academia and industry.

TO THE EDITOR: I read with great interest the recent JNM article by Walker et al. comparing data-driven and hardware-driven motion correction technologies in PET ([1][1]). The former is an important innovation, and its transition into the marketplace is exciting to see. Publications such as this one

MR-based cardiac and respiratory motion correction of PET: application to static and dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG imaging

Motion of the myocardium deteriorates the quality and quantitative accuracy of cardiac PET images. We present a method for MR-based cardiac and respiratory motion correction of cardiac PET data and evaluate its impact on estimation of activity and kinetic parameters in human subjects. Three healthy subjects underwent simultaneous dynamic 18F-FDG PET and MRI on a hybrid PET/MR scanner. A cardiorespiratory motion field was determined for each subject using navigator, tagging and golden-angle radial MR acquisitions. Acquired coincidence events were binned into cardiac and respiratory phases using electrocardiogram and list mode-driven signals, respectively. Dynamic PET images were reconstructed with MR-based motion correction (MC) and without motion correction (NMC). Parametric images of 18F-FDG consumption rates (Ki) were estimated using Patlak’s method for both MC and NMC images. MC alleviated motion artifacts in PET images, resulting in improved spatial resolution, improved recovery of activity in the myocardium wall and reduced spillover from the myocardium to the left ventricle cavity. Significantly higher myocardium contrast-to-noise ratio and lower apparent wall thickness were obtained in MC versus NMC images. Likewise, parametric images of Ki calculated with MC data had improved spatial resolution as compared to those obtained with NMC. Consistent with an increase in reconstructed activity concentration in the frames used during kinetic analyses, MC led to the estimation of higher Ki values almost everywhere in the myocardium, with up to 18% increase (mean across subjects) in the septum as compared to NMC. This study shows that MR-based motion correction of cardiac PET results in improved image quality that can benefit both static and dynamic studies.

Markerless motion tracking and correction for PET, MRI, and simultaneous PET/MRI.

ObjectiveWe demonstrate and evaluate the first markerless motion tracker compatible with PET, MRI, and simultaneous PET/MRI systems for motion correction (MC) of brain imaging.MethodsPET and MRI compatibility is achieved by careful positioning of in-bore vision extenders and by placing all electronic components out-of-bore. The motion tracker is demonstrated in a clinical setup during a pediatric PET/MRI study including 94 pediatric patient scans. PET MC is presented for two of these scans using a customized version of the Multiple Acquisition Frame method. Prospective MC of MRI acquisition of two healthy subjects is demonstrated using a motion-aware MRI sequence. Real-time motion estimates are accompanied with a tracking validity parameter to improve tracking reliability.ResultsFor both modalities, MC shows that motion induced artifacts are noticeably reduced and that motion estimates are sufficiently accurate to capture motion ranging from small respiratory motion to large intentional motion. In the PET/MRI study, a time-activity curve analysis shows image improvements for a patient performing head movements corresponding to a tumor motion of ±5-10 mm with a 19% maximal difference in standardized uptake value before and after MC.ConclusionThe first markerless motion tracker is successfully demonstrated for prospective MC in MRI and MC in PET with good tracking validity.SignificanceAs simultaneous PET/MRI systems have become available for clinical use, an increasing demand for accurate motion tracking and MC in PET/MRI scans has emerged. The presented markerless motion tracker facilitate this demand.

Rigid-body motion correction in hybrid PET/MRI using spherical navigator echoes

Integrated positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is an imaging technology that provides complementary anatomical and functional information for medical diagnostics. Both PET and MRI are highly susceptible to motion artifacts due, in part, to long acquisition times. The simultaneous acquisition of the two modalities presents the opportunity to use MRI navigator techniques for motion correction of both PET and MRI data. For this task, we propose spherical navigator echoes (SNAVs)—3D k-space navigators that can accurately and rapidly measure rigid body motion in all six degrees of freedom.SNAVs were incorporated into turbo FLASH (tfl)—a product fast gradient echo sequence—to create the tfl-SNAV pulse sequence. Acquiring in vivo brain images from a healthy volunteer with both sequences first compared the tfl-SNAV and product tfl sequences. It was observed that incorporation of the SNAVs into the image sequence did not have any detrimental impact on the image quality.The SNAV motion correction technique was evaluated using an anthropomorphic brain phantom. Following a stationary reference image where the tfl-SNAV sequence was acquired along with simultaneous list-mode PET, three identical PET/MRI scans were performed where the phantom was moved several times throughout each acquisition. This motion—up to 11° and 14 mm—resulted in motion artifacts in both PET and MR images. Following SNAV motion correction of the MRI and PET list-mode data, artifact reduction was achieved for both the PET and MR images in all three motion trials. The corrected images have improved image quality and are quantitatively more similar to the ground truth reference images.

Partial volume and motion correction in cardiac PET: First results from an in vs ex vivo comparison using animal datasets

BackgroundIn a previous study on ex vivo, static cardiac datasets, we investigated the benefits of performing partial volume correction (PVC) in cardiac 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG) PET datasets. In the present study, we extend the analysis to in vivo cardiac datasets, with the aim of defining which reconstruction technique maximizes quantitative accuracy and, ultimately, makes PET a better diagnostic tool for cardiac pathologies. MethodsIn vivo sheep datasets were acquired and reconstructed with/without motion correction and using several reconstruction algorithms (with/without resolution modeling, with/without non-anatomical priors). Corresponding ex vivo scans of the excised sheep hearts were performed on a small-animal PET scanner (Siemens Focus 220, microPET) to provide high-resolution reference data unaffected by respiratory and cardiac motion. A comparison between the in vivo cardiac reconstructions and the corresponding ex vivo ground truth was performed. ResultsThe use of an edge-preserving prior (Total Variation (TV) prior in this work) in combination with motion correction reduces the bias in absolute quantification when compared to the standard clinical reconstructions (− 0.83 vs − 3.74 SUV units), when the end-systolic gate is considered. At end-diastole, motion correction improves absolute quantification but the PVC with priors does not improve the similarity to the ground truth more than a regular iterative reconstruction with motion correction and without priors. Relative quantification was not influenced much by the chosen reconstruction algorithm. ConclusionsThe relative ranking of the algorithms suggests superiority of the PVC reconstructions with dual gating in terms of overall absolute quantification and noise properties. A well-tuned edge-preserving prior, such as TV, enhances the noise properties of the resulting images of the heart. The end-systolic gate yields the most accurate quantification of cardiac datasets.

MR-PET head motion correction based on co-registration of multicontrast MR images.

Head motion is a major source of image artefacts in neuroimaging studies and can lead to degradation of the quantitative accuracy of reconstructed PET images. Simultaneous magnetic resonance-positron emission tomography (MR-PET) makes it possible to estimate head motion information from high-resolution MR images and then correct motion artefacts in PET images. In this article, we introduce a fully automated PET motion correction method, MR-guided MAF, based on the co-registration of multicontrast MR images. The performance of the MR-guided MAF method was evaluated using MR-PET data acquired from a cohort of ten healthy participants who received a slow infusion of fluorodeoxyglucose ([18-F]FDG). Compared with conventional methods, MR-guided PET image reconstruction can reduce head motion introduced artefacts and improve the image sharpness and quantitative accuracy of PET images acquired using simultaneous MR-PET scanners. The fully automated motion estimation method has been implemented as a publicly available web-service.

Assessing Reliability of Myocardial Blood Flow After Motion Correction With Dynamic PET Using a Bayesian Framework.

The estimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) in dynamic PET can be biased by many different processes. A major source of error, particularly in clinical applications, is patient motion. Patient motion, or gross motion, creates displacements between different PET frames as well as between the PET frames and the CT-derived attenuation map, leading to errors in MBF calculation from voxel time series. Motion correction techniques are challenging to evaluate quantitatively and the impact on MBF reliability is not fully understood. Most metrics, such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), are characteristic of static images, and are not specific to motion correction in dynamic data. This study presents a new approach of estimating motion correction quality in dynamic cardiac PET imaging. It relies on calculating a MBF surrogate, K1 , along with the uncertainty on the parameter. This technique exploits a Bayesian framework, representing the kinetic parameters as a probability distribution, from which the uncertainty measures can be extracted. If the uncertainty extracted is high, the parameter studied is considered to have high variability - or low confidence - and vice versa. The robustness of the framework is evaluated on simulated time activity curves to ensure that the uncertainties are consistently estimated at the multiple levels of noise. Our framework is applied on 40 patient datasets, divided in 4 motion magnitude categories. Experienced observers manually realigned clinical datasets with 3D translations to correct for motion. K1 uncertainties were compared before and after correction. A reduction of uncertainty after motion correction of up to 60% demonstrates the benefit of motion correction in dynamic PET and as well as provides evidence of the usefulness of the new method presented.

An Efficient Approach to Perform MR-assisted PET Data Optimization in Simultaneous PET/MR Neuroimaging Studies.

A main advantage of PET is that it provides quantitative measures of the radiotracer concentration, but its accuracy is confounded by several factors, including attenuation, subject motion, and limited spatial resolution. Using the information from one simultaneously acquired morphological MR sequence with embedded navigators, we propose an efficient method called MR-assisted PET data optimization (MaPET) to perform attenuation correction (AC), motion correction, and anatomy-aided reconstruction. Methods: For attenuation correction, voxel-wise linear attenuation coefficient maps were generated using an SPM8-based approach method on the MR volume. The embedded navigators were used to derive head motion estimates for event-based PET motion correction. The anatomy provided by the MR volume was incorporated into the PET image reconstruction using a kernel-based method. Region-based analyses were carried out to assess the quality of images generated through various stages of PET data optimization. Results: The optimized PET images reconstructed with MaPET was superior in image quality compared to images reconstructed using only attenuation correction, with high SNR and low coefficient of variation (5.08 and 0.229 in a composite cortical region compared to 3.12 and 0.570). The optimized images were also shown using the Cohen's d metric to achieve a greater effect size in distinguishing cortical regions with hypometabolism from regions of preserved metabolism in each individual for different diagnosis groups. Conclusion: We have shown the spatiotemporally correlated data acquired using a single MR sequence can be used for PET attenuation, motion and partial volume effects corrections and the MaPET method may enable more accurate assessment of pathological changes in dementia and other brain disorders.

Concurrent Respiratory Motion Correction of Abdominal PET and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI Using a Compressed Sensing Approach.

We present an approach for concurrent reconstruction of respiratory motion-compensated abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and PET data in an integrated PET/MR scanner. The MR and PET reconstructions share the same motion vector fields derived from radial MR data; the approach is robust to changes in respiratory pattern and does not increase the total acquisition time. Methods: PET and DCE-MRI data of 12 oncologic patients were simultaneously acquired for 6 min on an integrated PET/MR system after administration of 18F-FDG and gadoterate meglumine. Golden-angle radial MR data were continuously acquired simultaneously with PET data and sorted into multiple motion phases on the basis of a respiratory signal derived directly from the radial MR data. The resulting multidimensional dataset was reconstructed using a compressed sensing approach that exploits sparsity among respiratory phases. Motion vector fields obtained using the full 6-min (MC6-min) and only the last 1 min (MC1-min) of data were incorporated into the PET reconstruction to obtain motion-corrected PET images and in an MR iterative reconstruction algorithm to produce a series of motion-corrected DCE-MR images (moco_GRASP). The motion-correction methods (MC6-min and MC1-min) were evaluated by qualitative analysis of the MR images and quantitative analysis of SUVmax and SUVmean, contrast, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and lesion volume in the PET images. Results: Motion-corrected MC6-min PET images demonstrated 30%, 23%, 34%, and 18% increases in average SUVmax, SUVmean, contrast, and SNR and an average 40% reduction in lesion volume with respect to the non-motion-corrected PET images. The changes in these figures of merit were smaller but still substantial for the MC1-min protocol: 19%, 10%, 15%, and 9% increases in average SUVmax, SUVmean, contrast, and SNR; and a 28% reduction in lesion volume. Moco_GRASP images were deemed of acceptable or better diagnostic image quality with respect to conventional breath-hold Cartesian volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination acquisitions. Conclusion: We presented a method that allows the simultaneous acquisition of respiratory motion-corrected diagnostic quality DCE-MRI and quantitatively accurate PET data in an integrated PET/MR scanner with negligible prolongation in acquisition time compared with routine PET/DCE-MRI protocols.

PET motion correction in context of integrated PET/MR: Current techniques, limitations, and future projections.

Patient motion is an important consideration in modern PET image reconstruction. Advances in PET technology mean motion has an increasingly important influence on resulting image quality. Motion-induced artifacts can have adverse effects on clinical outcomes, including missed diagnoses and oversized radiotherapy treatment volumes. This review aims to summarize the wide variety of motion correction techniques available in PET and combined PET/CT and PET/MR, with a focus on the latter. A general framework for the motion correction of PET images is presented, consisting of acquisition, modeling, and correction stages. Methods for measuring, modeling, and correcting motion and associated artifacts, both in literature and commercially available, are presented, and their relative merits are contrasted. Identified limitations of current methods include modeling of aperiodic and/or unpredictable motion, attaining adequate temporal resolution for motion correction in dynamic kinetic modeling acquisitions, and maintaining availability of the MR in PET/MR scans for diagnostic acquisitions. Finally, avenues for future investigation are discussed, with a focus on improvements that could improve PET image quality, and that are practical in the clinical environment.

Erratum to: Motion correction in simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging using sparsely sampled MR navigators: a clinically feasible tool.

Background We present a study performing motion correction (MC) of PET using MR navigators sampled between other protocolled MR sequences during simultaneous PET/MR brain scanning with the purpose of evaluating its clinical feasibility and the potential improvement of image quality.