Perspectives Of Healthcare Professionals Research Articles

Unmet Needs of Children and Young Adults With ADHD: Insights From Key Stakeholders on Priorities for Stigma Reduction.

Individuals with ADHD continue to face stigma, which can negatively impact their access to, adherence to, and quality of mental health services, as well as their overall wellbeing. Perspectives of various stakeholders regarding priorities for stigma reduction remain underexplored. This study explores young adult, parent, teacher, and mental health care professional perspectives on unmet needs of children and young adults with ADHD in the Netherlands, in the context of stigma reduction. A total of 24 respondents participated in seven small focus group discussions (FGDs). The FGDs facilitated in-depth discussions exploring stakeholder group perspectives on unmet needs of children and young adults with ADHD in educational, professional, and social settings. Data was analyzed using thematic content analysis. Three thematic categories of unmet needs were identified: (1) a lack of awareness, knowledge, and understanding of ADHD; (2) insufficient personalized approaches in education and health care; and (3) limited accessibility of information and support services. Within theme 1, respondents primarily highlighted the importance of improving education for primary school teachers and mental health care professionals. Theme 2 underscored the need for increased capacity for personalization and attention to the sociopsychological factors of ADHD, alongside recognizing strengths. Theme 3 emphasized the need for easy access to reliable information and mental health care, including peer networks, as well as proper follow-up and continuity of care. Findings highlight the need for improving our understanding of ADHD as a complex biopsychosocial condition, which requires specific adjustments in education and mental health care. Interventions to improve support and disrupt stigmatization should meet diverse needs, incorporate multi-level strategies, and involve key stakeholders.

Challenges associated with access to recently developed hemophilia treatments in routine care: perspectives of healthcare professionals.

The treatment landscape for haemophilia continues to rapidly develop, and expectations for future treatment success are high. There is limited information on the challenges to accessing new and innovative therapies. The aim of this study was to explore challenges with accessing haemophilia treatment from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs). A crosssectional study design was used. A pilot-tested, online survey was distributed to haemophilia treatment centres in Australia, Canada, France, Italy, New Zealand, Republic of Ireland, Turkey, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The questionnaire covered questions on product access, economic considerations, health technology assessment requirements, and patient organization involvement. The results were analyzed descriptively using SPSS. A total of 154 HCPs completed the questionnaire. There was heterogeneity across countries, regions, and centres regarding HCPs' knowledge of access to novel recently developed treatments. Notable limitations to access were reported such as differences in access based on age of patient and type of product, economic considerations, and the growing influence of HTA bodies. Many countries have a hemophilia patient organization that does not have a vote at the decision-making table. There is a need to empower HCPs to better understand national healthcare structures and decisions that lead to access limitations. Requirements from HTA bodies must be understood to optimally design clinical studies and value generation of treatment options. This may strengthen the haemophilia treatment centre's voice to collectively mandate for exchange with key involved individuals, such as the payers and politicians for the provision of optimal therapy.

Barriers to diagnosing and treating vulval lichen sclerosus: a survey study.

Background Vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a chronic inflammatory condition that is frequently misdiagnosed and under-recognised. To date, qualitative research focuses on lived experience of VLS, with women attributing diagnostic delay to poor interactions with health care professionals (HCPs) often due to lack of knowledge. In the UK, women with VLS are most likely to present to primary care. Aim To establish HCPs perspectives on identification, management and education of vulval skin disease, with a focus on VLS. Design and Setting A survey was distributed to HCPs working in primary care. Method The survey was distributed via professional networks and at events. Analysis comprised of descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlations, and thematic analysis. Results Of 122 respondents, 53 were General Practitioners (GPs) and 59 were GP trainees. 37.7% of respondents had never participated in teaching nor learning on vulval skin disease. Confidence in the identification of vulval skin disease positively correlated with experience, exposure and female gender. The top identified barriers to diagnosis and treatment included lack of knowledge, embarrassment, and absence of VLS diagnostic criteria. Almost all participants (97.5%) felt VLS diagnostic criteria would be helpful in clinical practice. Conclusion This study provides insight into the barriers to diagnosing and treating VLS in primary care. HCPs recognise deficiencies in training, referral pathways and lack of tools to support VLS diagnosis. Training should include skills to address stigma and embarrassment. This study highlights the importance of developing interventions to overcome barriers, expediting diagnosis and treatment, such as reproducible diagnostic criteria.

Experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic on child and adolescent psychiatric wards: multi-methods investigation.

Child and adolescent mental health service in-patient beds are unevenly spread throughout England. Where demand outstrips bed availability, young people may be admitted at-distance or to adult psychiatric wards. The COVID-19 pandemic added pressures to already overstretched services. Understanding experiences during this period is vital to inform strategies for future emergencies. To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions to local, at-distance or adult psychiatric units, from the perspectives of young people, parents/carers and healthcare professionals. Multi-methods data were collected from February 2021 to September 2022, as part of the Far Away from Home research programme. A 13-month national surveillance study collected information about admissions to general adolescent units >50 miles from home, out-of-region or to adult psychiatric units. Free-text data from respondents (n = 51) were analysed using content analysis. Interviews with young people (n = 30), parents/carers (n = 21) and healthcare professionals (n = 68) were analysed using thematic analysis. Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic affected young people's contact with others; the requirement to self-isolate on admission and following overnight leave felt distressing, and visiting was limited. This disincentivised overnight leave, leading to some discharges being delayed and others feeling rushed and high risk. The COVID-19 pandemic also accelerated the introduction of virtual meetings, enabling community teams and families to be more involved in therapies, meetings and decision-making. Restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic were often negatively perceived. However, the increased use of technology was felt to be positive, widening inclusion and mitigating some negative effects of distance on admissions.

Perspectives of Australian healthcare professionals towards gamification in practice.

Gamification may be an effective tool in motivating sustained behaviour change. This study aimed to explore perspectives of Australian-based healthcare professionals, including dietitians, towards gamification in their practice when assisting patients/clients to achieve health-related goals. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals. Data was audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, de-identified and thematically analysed to identify key themes and inform the creation of personas. Six dietitians, two psychologists, two exercise physiologists, one medical specialist, with 1-24 years of work experience, participated. Most participants (n = 7, 64%) were unable to articulate a definition of gamification, however, when offered more context, they could identify examples. Overall, participants were positive towards gamification, regardless of prior experience/exposure. Three themes emerged; (1) Variable familiarity with gamification, (2) Context matters, (3) Barriers hinder engagement/adoption. Stage of career rather than profession influenced participants' views of gamification, as reflected in three characterising personas; 'Joel: Early-Career, Progressive', 'Bella: Mid-Career, Stable' and 'Sam: Advanced-Career, Expert'. Findings suggest that gamification is not widely used in health practice in Australia. Concerns about participation costs and data privacy are adoption barriers. Promotion of the effectiveness of gamification as a valuable adjunct tool to encourage behaviour change needs support from peak bodies. Embedding gamification in university curricula could better prepare graduates to engage with gamification in future practice. Further research capturing more diverse healthcare professionals' perspectives is required to fully understand the potential of gamification to change health behaviours, and to design feasible gamified solutions.

Understanding European patterns of deprescribing antithrombotic medication during end-of-life care in patients with cancer

BackgroundEven though antithrombotic therapy (ATT) probably has little or even negative effect on the well-being of patients with cancer near the end of life, it is often continued until death, possibly leading to excess bleeding complications, increased disease burden, reduced quality of life and higher healthcare costs. AimTo explore and describe European practice patterns and perspectives of healthcare professionals from different disciplines and specialties on ATT in the end-of-life care (EOLC) of patients with cancer. MethodsWe performed a two-week international cross-sectional survey study using flash-mob research methodology. Eligible were healthcare professionals from different institutions across Europe, who prescribed ATT and/or dealt with EOLC of patients with cancer. The survey comprised three parts, including a series of choice sets (hypothetical scenarios involving a set of characteristics changing in level [e.g., high vs. low thrombotic risk]) on ATT management in EOLC. The discrete choice experiment analysis was conducted using multinomial logistic regression. ResultsOut of 467 pre-registrants, 208 participated in the survey from 4 to 18 July 2023. The majority (53 %) considered a patient with cancer as in EOLC when life expectancy is below 3 months. Respondents reported seeing or treating 20 patients with cancer on ATT in EOLC per year (IQR 10–50). The median estimated frequency of considering ATT deprescription per healthcare professional was 10 times per year (IQR 4–10), while the frequency of actual deprescription was 5 times per year (IQR 2–10). Twenty percent of respondents had never deprescribed ATT in the context of EOLC. Across the eight choice sets, five respondents (2.7 %) found deprescribing inappropriate in any scenario. Deprescribing was more often considered in patients with poor ECOG-performance status, high bleeding risk and low-molecular-weight heparin use as opposed to oral ATT. Haemato-oncology and cardiovascular medicine specialists were more inclined to deprescribe antiplatelet therapy than other specialties. ConclusionOur study describes medical decision-making regarding ATT in EOLC of patients with cancer. Healthcare professionals' perspectives and practice patterns vary, and some preferences appear associated with the therapists' professional focus and region of practice.

Paediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the development of patient-specific therapy: ethical perspectives through experts' opinions.

Research for personalised therapies concerning the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in children involves the utilisation of OMICS technologies and Artificial Intelligence (AI). To identify specific ethical challenges through the perspective of healthcare professionals, we conducted 10 semi-structured interviews. The development of interview questions for the interviews was preceded by a systematic review of the scientific literature. To address the complexities of paediatric emergency research, informed consent, and data processing, experts with expertise in paediatric intensive care, computer science, and medical law were sought. After the transcription and anonymisation, the analysis followed established guidelines for qualitative content and thematic analysis. Interviewees highlighted the intricacies of managing consent in personalised SIRS research due to the large amount and complexity of information necessary for autonomous decision-making. Thus, instruments aimed at enhancing the understanding of legal guardians and to empowering the child were appreciated and the need for specific guidelines and establishing standards was expressed. Medical risks were estimated to be low, but the challenges of securing anonymisation and data protection were expected. It was emphasised that risks and benefits cannot be anticipated at this stage. Social justice issues were identified because of possible biases within the research population. Our findings were analysed using current ethical and legal frameworks for research with a focus on the particularities of the patient group and the emergency background. In this particular context, experts advocated for an enabling approach pertaining to AI in combination with OMICS technologies. As with every new technological development, ethical and legal challenges cannot be foreseen for SIRS-personalised treatment. Given this circumstance, experts emphasised the importance of extending the ethics-legal discourse beyond mere restrictions. The organisation of supervision should be reconsidered and not limited only to the precautionary principle, which per se was seen as impeding both the medical progress and clinical flexibility. It was noted that the establishment and monitoring of guidelines were emergent and should evolve through an interdisciplinary discourse. Therefore, it was recommended to enhance the qualifications of physicians in the field of computer science, impart ethics training to AI developers, and involve experts with expertise in medical law and data protection.

Perspectives of patients, partners, primary and hospital-based health care professionals on living with advanced cancer and systemic treatment

Abstract Purpose An emerging group of patients lives longer with advanced cancer while receiving systemic treatment. This study aimed to investigate psychosocial aspects of living longer with advanced cancer, and experiences with psychosocial care, from the perspectives of patients, partners, and health care professionals (HCPs). Methods From May to December 2020, participants were purposively selected. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted by video or phone call, containing open questions regarding psychosocial aspects and psychosocial care in oncology. The data was analysed following thematic analysis, leading to overarching psychosocial themes and indications for optimal organisation of psycho-oncological care. Results Fifteen patients, seven partners and eleven HCPs were interviewed. The main psychosocial aspects were increasing loss in several life domains, complexity of making life choices, ongoing uncertainty, and fluctuating fear and hope. Partners were affected by their loved ones’ condition and reported to put themselves second for longer periods of time, while sometimes missing adequate support. HCPs were challenged by addressing the altering psychosocial needs of patients, and tools to identify those in need for psychosocial support are currently lacking. Conclusions Living longer with advanced cancer presents unique challenges for patients and their partners, as well as for HCPs in delivering optimal psychosocial care. Implications for Cancer Survivors Identifying and addressing patients’ psychosocial needs from an early stage on, appointing a central hospital-based contact person, limiting the waiting time between scans and consultations, and addressing the partners’ wellbeing are suggestions to organise optimal psychosocial support in advanced cancer.

Empowerment and interprofessional collaboration in health promotion centre Murska Sobota

Abstract Background Health promotion centres (HPCs) were introduced in Slovenian primary health care centres to provide interventions against risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). HPCs integrate a multidisciplinary and community-based primary care approach to the prevention of NCDs and provide free lifestyle intervention programmes. This study aims to explore the perspectives of health care professionals on promoting health of local community members, as well as their perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in HPCs. Methods Two group discussions were conducted with a total of 11 health care professionals at the HPC Murska Sobota. Data collection was accompanied by a dual role interpreter in accordance with the principles of cross-language qualitative research. The data was transcribed, semantically translated and thematically analysed. Results Health care professionals emphasize the importance of health-related empowerment of individuals for the success of health promotion activities and therefore for the improvement of individuals’ quality of life. This is based on shared decision-making, self-management and educational measures in a combination of population- and individual-based approaches. The need for efficient interprofessional communication, characterized by a flat hierarchy, is stressed. Structured cooperation with other health care facilities, as well as close collaboration with communities and local media, are described as crucial for reaching all individuals and promoting health equity. Conclusions Interprofessional collaboration, health-related empowerment of individuals and collaboration with local communities are fundamental for the success of health promotion activities, achieving health equity and preventing NCDs. Understanding how these activities are implemented from the health care professionals’ perspective can help other health facilities developing and improving local health promotion strategies. Key messages • Slovenian health care professionals see interprofessional collaboration as fundamental for the implementation of health-promotion strategies. • Health-related empowerment of individuals and collaboration with local communities play an important role in achieving health equity in health promotion activities.

Bridging the gap: a qualitative process evaluation from the perspectives of healthcare professionals of an audit-and-feedback-based intervention to improve transition to adult care for young people living with type 1 diabetes

BackgroundThe transition from pediatric to adult care is a vulnerable time for young people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Bridging the Gap (BTG) is an audit-and-feedback (AF) intervention aimed at improving both transitions-in-care processes and diabetes management in the year following transition. As part of BTG, we conducted a qualitative process evaluation to understand: (a) what was implemented and how; and (b) the contextual factors (micro-, meso- and macro-) that affected implementation, outcomes and study processes.MethodsUsing qualitative descriptive methodology, interviews were conducted with 13 healthcare professionals (HCPs) delivering diabetes care to transitioning youth. Participants were asked about their experiences of BTG study processes and feedback tools, the quality improvement (QI) initiatives implemented at their site, and potential spread and scale. Interviews also explored the impacts of COVID-19 on transition care and study processes and results.ResultsFive key themes were identified. Participants’ reflections on the BTG study design indicated they appreciated its flexible, site-specific approach to QI, which they saw as crucial to the success of their initiatives. Engagement with feedback reports and other study resources provided comparative, site-specific data. Participants described the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on patients, care provision and study implementation. Their site-specific QI initiatives resulted in changes to their transition practices. Finally, participants commented on how BTG and its processes fostered a community of practice (CoP) between sites, resulting in new opportunities to collaborate and share experiences.ConclusionsBTG resulted in a CoP among practitioners delivering transition care to youth with T1D, which could be scaled up to promote a learning health system in pediatric diabetes care. Qualitative process evaluation is a useful tool for understanding how contextual factors affect the implementation and outcomes of complex QI interventions.

Navigating Communication in Nursing Homes During COVID-19: Perspectives From Families, Healthcare Professionals, and Managers in Southern Switzerland-A Qualitative Study.

This study aims to understand the effectiveness and challenges of communication strategies implemented to maintain contact between nursing home (NH) residents and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic, by considering the perspectives of families, healthcare professionals, and NH managers. Using a qualitative research design, the study analyzed in-depth semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (N = 34), including family members, NH staff, and managers. The study found that communication strategies like video calls, telephone calls, and window visits were generally appreciated and facilitated contact between residents and their families. However, challenges emerged around technical and organizational issues. Both internal and external stakeholders concurred that an increase in technological and human resources was necessary to alleviate these challenges. The study underscores the importance of innovative and flexible communication strategies to sustain connections between NH residents and their families in crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Future readiness calls for increased investment in human and technical resources, and a commitment to understanding and addressing the diverse communication needs of NH residents.

Treatment preferences in spinal muscular atrophy: A swing weighting study for caregivers of patients with SMA types 1 and 2.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neuromuscular disorder characterized by skeletal muscle weakness and atrophy. Patients with SMA types 1 and 2 develop severe disabilities conferring substantial patient and caregiver burden. Caregiver treatment characteristic preferences are useful for informing treatment choices and improving adherence. We aimed to identify drivers of SMA treatment preference from the perspective of caregivers of patients with SMA types 1 or 2 in the United States. We quantified the relative importance of different treatment characteristics and compared preferences for hypothetical treatment scenarios. Treatment attributes and attribute levels elicited were based on a literature search and interviews with caregivers and health care professionals. The most important treatment characteristics from the perspective of health care professionals and caregivers were identified and used in a survey to quantify relative importance for caregivers. Caregivers completed surveys regarding their preferences using swing weighting methodology. These results were used to estimate the relative value of four hypothetical SMA treatment scenarios exploring different modes of treatment administration. The swing weighting survey, completed by 20 caregivers, demonstrated that the attributes driving treatment preference were reduction in permanent ventilation needs and risk of severe adverse events, followed by treatment access (including cost coverage and availability), increased ability to sit without support, and less treatment administration burden. The hypothetical SMA treatment scenarios with the highest relative value offered an easier mode of administration, lowest risk of severe adverse events, less need of permanent ventilation, and highest ability of patients to feed and sit without support. Our findings suggest that caregivers prefer a treatment with reduced clinical burden and risk in which the cost is covered and treatment is available in the short term. These results can provide important contextual information for decision-makers and help promote patient-centered care for patients with SMA.

Identifying the need for a nurse-driven palliative care intervention for American Indian and rural family caregivers.

The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the needs of family caregivers (FCGs) from the perspectives of health care professionals delivering cancer care to American Indian and rural populations. A descriptive content analysis of 18 interviews with multidisciplinary health care professionals delivering cancer care at a rural cancer institute in the Great Plains region was conducted. We identified three themes: access, support, and awareness with six subthemes. Consideration of these core needs, coupled with the individual cultural circumstance, is critical in addressing disparities faced by American Indian/Alaska Native and rural FCGs. The availability of specialized health care services, like palliative care, can positively impact the experience of FCGs providing care. However, access is limited. The needs and challenges faced by American Indian/Alaska Native and rural FCGs described in this study can inform the development of a culturally responsive palliative care intervention. Nurses are well positioned to develop and lead this intervention, which will be the first of its kind. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Chasing sleep physicians: ChatGPT-4o on the interpretation of polysomnographic results.

From a healthcare professional's perspective, the use of ChatGPT (Open AI), a large language model (LLM), offers huge potential as a practical and economic digital assistant. However, ChatGPT has not yet been evaluated for the interpretation of polysomnographic results in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). To evaluate the agreement of polysomnographic result interpretation between ChatGPT-4o and a board-certified sleep physician and to shed light into the role of ChatGPT-4o in the field of medical decision-making in sleep medicine. For this proof-of-concept study, 40 comprehensive patient profiles were designed, which represent a broad and typical spectrum of cases, ensuring a balanced distribution of demographics and clinical characteristics. After various prompts were tested, one prompt was used for initial diagnosis of OSA anda further for patients with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy intolerance. Each polysomnographic result was independently evaluated by ChatGPT-4o and a board-certified sleep physician. Diagnosis and therapy suggestions were analyzed for agreement. ChatGPT-4o and the sleep physician showed 97% (29/30) concordance in the diagnosis of the simple cases. For the same cases the two assessment instances unveiled 100% (30/30) concordance regarding therapy suggestions. For cases with intolerance of treatment with positive airway pressure (PAP) ChatGPT-4o and the sleep physician revealed 70% (7/10) concordance in the diagnosis and 44% (22/50) concordance for therapy suggestions. Precise prompting improves the output of ChatGPT-4o and provides sleep physician-like polysomnographic result interpretation. Although ChatGPT shows some shortcomings in offering treatment advice, our results provide evidence for AI assisted automation and economization of polysomnographic interpretation by LLMs. Further research should explore data protection issues and demonstrate reproducibility with real patient data on a larger scale.

Moral challenges and understanding of clinical ethics in Tanzanian hospitals: Perspectives of healthcare professionals.

Healthcare professionals encounter many moral challenges in their daily clinical practice. However, there have been few studies on the subject matter in Tanzania. This study aims to provide an account of moral challenges faced by healthcare professionals in Tanzanian hospitals, their understanding of clinical ethics, and the ethics education they have received. Many participants reported receiving some kind of ethics training through formal education and on-the-job training. Some participants understood ethics in healthcare settings as adherence to established laws, regulations, guidelines, procedures, norms, and rules essential in clinical practice. Analysis of the data identified four themes of moral challenges. These challenges are related to 1) decision-making and communication in clinical practice, 2) scarcity of medical resources and prioritization in clinical practice, 3) withdrawal of curative treatment, and 4) conflicts between professional judgment, religious convictions and adherence to alternative treatments. Based on the findings, we suggest a context-sensitive form of clinical ethics training to prepare healthcare professionals to recognize and address these moral challenges.

DESAFIOS NA ADESÃO MEDICAMENTOSA SOB A PERSPECTIVA DOS PROFISSIONAIS DE SAÚDE DA ATENÇÃO PRIMÁRIA

This study explores the factors influencing medication adherence among patients of the Family Health Strategy (ESF) in Embu das Artes/SP, based on the perspectives of healthcare professionals. The qualitative research, which involved semi-structured interviews and a literature review, identified low health literacy among patients as the primary barrier. Adherence to treatment is influenced by internal factors, such as patient perception and motivation, as well as external factors, including socioeconomic status and cultural aspects. The lack of understanding regarding the importance of medications and the chronic nature of diseases exacerbates the problem, leading to elevated risks such as mortality and hospital readmission. Professionals reported challenges such as fear of side effects and confusion over medication schedules. These issues underscore the need to enhance healthcare professionals' training to develop educational strategies aimed at providing health literacy and achieving more effective treatment adherence.

Assessing the pertinence and usefulness of HIV and AIDS indicators for evaluating clinical care quality: Perspectives of health care professionals

Following a systematic review of quality indicators employed in the evaluation of clinical care for individuals with HIV and AIDS, we performed “an exploratory study” that aims to assess the clinical significance and practical applicability of these indicators from the perspective of health care professionals (HCPs) specialising in HIV and AIDS care. Twenty-five HCPs filled out two questionnaires. From the initial list of 88 quality indicators, 50 were identified as the most relevant and useful in HIV and AIDS clinical care. Analysis was conducted on the individual indicators, and the outcomes were categorised into seven domains for clinical relevance and practical usefulness. Health care professionals deemed the functional organisational structure and the therapy domain to have the most pertinent and useful indicators among the seven different clinical domains, followed by the prevention domain.

Understanding stakeholder perspectives on Apgar score, cyanosis and identifying jaundice in ethnic minority neonates.

To explore neonatal assessments that include an element of evaluating skin colour in neonates of black, Asian and minority ethnicities, focusing on the Apgar score, presence of cyanosis and presence of jaundice. We employed focused ethnography involving diverse healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents or caregivers with Black, Asian, or ethnic minority children born in the last five years. Zoom interviews were performed following a semi-structured interview guide. Ethnographic data analysis was conducted using NVivo software. There was a lack of consistency in how HCPs applied the Apgar scores, which also varied from textbook guidelines. The use of pink as a skin colour descriptor for ethnic minority neonates created a divide among both parents and HCPs. HCPs relied more heavily on other elements of the Apgar score or infant breathing and crying at birth to gauge infant wellness. When identifying cyanosis, HCPs depend on specific body locations for accurate assessment of oxygenation, but the limitations of visual assessment are acknowledged. For jaundice, most HCPs recognised the difficulty in identifying the colour yellow in infants with darker skin tones. HCPs focussed on yellowing of the sclera and gums and other well-being assessments to detect jaundice. Some interviewed parents noticed jaundice in their infants before HCPs but felt they were not listened to when raising concerns. HCPs acknowledged the need for additional training to effectively assess the health of ethnic minority infants. This study highlights disparities in neonatal health assessment from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and parents from diverse backgrounds. Varied practices in determining the Apgar score and recognising cyanosis and jaundice signal the need for standardised protocols, appropriate educational materials, and targeted training. Addressing these challenges is vital for equitable care, emphasising comprehensive training and bias mitigation efforts in maternal and neonatal healthcare.

Healthcare professionals' perceptions on providing support to informal carers within stroke care.

The sudden nature of stroke onset does not provide carers with sufficient time to prepare for the demands associated with caring. Healthcare professionals can have a vital role in providing carers with support and training, which may reduce carer stress and strain, and allow for better health and rehabilitation outcomes for the stroke survivor. The experiences of healthcare professionals on supporting carers in stroke care, however, remain unclear. To understand the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals working in stroke care on implementing resources and support to informal stroke carers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 healthcare professionals (5 occupational therapists, 5 physiotherapists, 1 psychologist) with at least 12 months' experience in working with stroke survivors. Interviews ranged from 25-70 minutes in duration, and were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Three overarching categories that were explored were: (1) Experiences of working in stroke care and supporting carers; (2) Recommendations for a program designed for carers; and (3) Future priorities in stroke care. Participants discussed a variety of strategies they utilised to support carers including collaborating with other healthcare professionals and utilising skills and experience. Healthcare professionals highlighted the need for additional resources that are designed specifically for carers and explored key topics including carer stress and fatigue, support services, stroke education, and how to look after oneself. Participants identified priorities for stroke care including additional professional training and resource availability. This study provided a unique insight from the perspectives of healthcare professionals on supporting carers. Participants identified the need for additional training and resources to equip healthcare professionals to better support carers. Future programs designed for carers should be informed by the needs and experiences of both informal carers and healthcare professionals.

A qualitative exploration of policy interventions to improve the health-related quality of life of people living with HIV AIDS and co-morbidities of hypertension and/or diabetes in Ghana.

The intersection of infectious diseases, such as HIV, with chronic conditions like hypertension and diabetes poses a significant challenge in global health. While advancements in antiretroviral therapy have transformed HIV into a manageable chronic condition, a growing number of individuals with HIV now grapple with coexisting non-communicable diseases, impacting their Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Despite strides in HIV care, there is a notable policy gap that undermines efforts to address HIV-associated co-morbidities, particularly hypertension and diabetes, especially efforts to improve access, early detection, and ultimately HRQoL for individuals with HIV and co-morbidities. This study seeks to explore policy interventions aimed at improving the quality of life of HIV patients with hypertension or diabetes. The study utilized a qualitative descriptive design to explore the experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals and support staff regarding policy interventions for managing HIV patients with hypertension and/or diabetes co-morbidities in three regions of Ghana. The research was conducted in the Upper West, Ashanti, and Greater Accra regions among 11 participants, chosen purposively from professions involved in HIV patient care to understand their views on the implementation of policy interventions to HRQoL for individuals with HIV and co-morbidities. In-depth interviews were conducted face-to-face and tape-recorded. Thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the data. The study involved 11 participants from three regions with varied years of experience. Implemented policies that potentially improve the HRQoL for individuals with HIV and co-morbidities involve support groups, home visits, provision of free drugs, and counselling. Barriers to policy implementation included non-adherence to medication, stigma, cost of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) medications, accessibility issues to NCDs services, lack of interest or understanding among implementers, and high staff turnover. Facilitators encompassed in-service training, guidelines in common platforms, knowledge sharing, external resources, regular check-ups, and motivational packages for patients. Individuals with HIV and comorbidities face complex challenges impacting their HRQoL, including emotional and financial dimensions. The study identifies critical policies and barriers, underscoring the need for tailored, patient-centered approaches. Facilitators like in-service training and regular check-ups offer actionable insights for effective policy implementation, emphasizing improved health outcomes for those with comorbid conditions. The study recommends integrated care approach and adherence support programs that address the unique challenges faced by people living with HIV.