It is meaningful to look back on the current alternative service system at the present time, three years after the alternative service system was implemented. In particular, considering that there is still controversy over the punishment of the alternative service system, it is necessary to reconsider what direction the alternative service system should have in the future. Currently, alternative service personnel in Korea are serving in correctional facilities for 36 months, twice the length of active military service, which is longer than the maximum difference between the general military service period and the alternative service period in Armenia, which the European Court of Human Rights called punitive. In addition, in Armenia, it was controversial that the place of service should be at the workplace 24 hours a day, even though the place of service was various private institutions such as orphanages, nursing homes, mental health institutions, and facilities for the disabled. In Korea, the form of having to serve in a single place called correctional facilities and camp service can be even more problematic. In fact, although there are no uniformly established standards under international law regarding the period of alternative service, according to the recommendations of the Ministerial Committee within the European Council and the decisions of the UN Human Rights Commission, it is mentioned that the period of alternative service should be within a reasonable range that is non-punitive. In addition, among the countries implementing alternative service, the largest difference in period of less than 1.5 times was found. And the European countries have alternative service institutions in various fields, such as social welfare, health, culture, religion, peace, education, the environment, and emergency rescue, and Korea also needs to prepare a variety of service institutions as possible in addition to correctional facilities. In addition, in terms of diversifying service types, it is necessary to consider a method of distinguishing between the types of service that can be served as non-combatants within the military and the types of alternative service of civilians outside the military. Lastly, considering that there are countries that have abolished the interview survey in the process of applying for alternative service, and this was a measure of respect for the freedom of conscience of conscientious objectors, I think Korea needs to consider discussing it in the long run.