Approximately six percent of all children are regarded as having poor motor skills, though the aetiology may vary. Furthermore, the severity of motor skill problems predicts the increased likelihood of coexisting problems. This suggests that motor problems per se could be regarded as a specific vulnerability sign. In an era of managed health care, pay for performance, and focus on discrete diagnostic entities, motor skill problems have been greatly overlooked in treatment programs and psychiatric research. Recently however, Gillberg argued against such compartmentalized thinking and proposed that any preschool child with major problems (regarding general development, communication, language, social interrelatedness, attention, activity, behaviour, mood, sleep, or motor coordination) should be assessed for additional problems because these are likely to exist and are intercorrelated. With this in mind, Gillberg introduced the concept Early Symptomatic Syndromes Eliciting Neurodevelopmental Clinical Examinations (ESSENCE). Children with poor motor skills have a three-fold risk of being bullied, and bully victimization often coincides with poor social skills. This suggests that coordination, crucial for motor skills, may also be crucial for the development of social skills and that the cerebellum is of central interest. The notion that the cerebellum is purely a motor control device is not supported in the stroke literature. Cerebellar lesions can result in a cognitive affective syndrome including executive, visuospatial, and linguistic impairments, and affective dysregulation. The cerebellum is involved in temporal information processing, motor sequencing and planning, working memory, shifting of attention, implicit learning, emotional regulation and responses, and executive functions, areas that are highly affected in people with neurodevelopmental disorders. Also, abnormalities in the cerebellum are a consistent finding in imaging studies of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. In an interesting study, Livingstone and McPhillips show that children with partial hearing experience significant motor deficits. Moreover, the results suggest that children with cochlear inplants may be at particular risk where more complex motor control is required, as compared to children with hearing aids. The conventional vestibular deficit theory that states that motor problems in a child with partial hearing originate in a damaged or poorly functioning vestibular system is questioned by the authors. Instead they put forward that other sensory systems could be involved, and constraints in motor development could originate in a dynamic interaction between the level of hearing impairment, the task, and development. Not only children with partial hearing or with pervasive developmental disorders are at risk of impaired motor control; this is also the case in children with obesity, dyslexia, and emotional or behaviour problems. Conversely, children with motor coordination problems have high rates of internalizing disorders and attention-defiict–hyperactivity disorder. Insight into these relationships suggests, hypothetically, that motor skill training could increase performance not only in motor skills but influence other areas as well. This is supported by a study of persistence of primitive reflexes, particularly the asymmetrical tonic neck reflex (ATNR), which is highly persistent in children with specific reading problems. Repetition of primary-reflex movement training 10 minutes daily, for 12 months, not only attenuated the ATNR but improved reading. Moreover, in children in mainstream schools persistence of ATNR predicted reading and mathematical abilities, in addition movement training improved the academic results. Considering that the border between normality and pathology is blurred, overlapping conditions in psychiatry are often the rule and may reflect atypical brain development; internalizing and motor coordination problems are associated, and ‘clumsy’ children are less likely to participate in activities which require good motor skills. Thus, the impact of motor control and motor training are worthy of rigorous longitudinal studies in various groups in future research.