In 2008, the annual symposium of the Society for Histochemistry was held in Interlaken, Switzerland (1–4 October). It was not only the 50th symposium of the Society for Histochemistry, but also the 50th anniversary of Histochemistry and Cell Biology. Initially, I was invited by Jurgen Roth and the organizers to give a seminar on peroxisomes in a session on cellular defense mechanisms. When I became aware that the session was supposed to be chaired by H. Dariush Fahimi (the former supervisor of my PhD thesis) who was about to celebrate his 75th anniversary in 2008, I communicated this coincidental observation to the organizers. We spontaneously decided to celebrate H. Dariush Fahimi`s anniversary as well (without telling him!), and the session was renamed “Peroxisomes, ROS and HDF 75”. Furthermore, colleagues from the “early days” of peroxisome research were invited to make a contribution to the session (Fig. 1). Although scheduled for 8:00 am on a cloudy and rainy Friday morning, the topic attracted many participants and congratulators and led to vivid discussions. Subsequently, the speakers of the session were encouraged by the editors of this journal to summarize their talks in the form of a brief report or mini-review and to give a short overview and/or perspective of their Weld of interest. As an introduction to those reports, H. Dariush Fahimi (Heidelberg, Germany; Fig. 1) delineates how he contributed to the introduction of the DAB-method for light and electron microscopic visualization of peroxisomes. Coincidentally, the 50th anniversary symposium also commemorated the 40th year of the introduction of this elegant method, which led to the discovery of peroxisomes as a ubiquitous eukaryotic organelle. It was revealed that the peroxidatic activity of catalase, an abundant peroxisomal marker enzyme, is responsible for that staining. The discovery of the co-localization of several H2O2-producing oxidases, together with catalase in peroxisomes, was the Wrst indication suggesting the participation of peroxisomes in the metabolism of oxygen metabolites. It also led Christian de Duve to propose the term “peroxisome” for the designation of that organelle. In our brief report (Delille et al. this issue), we address the classical and novel views on the formation of peroxisomes, which is again hotly debated. We contributed to the identiWcation of the Wrst components involved in the growth and division of peroxisomes. Interestingly, some of these components (e.g., dynamin-like protein 1, hFis1, MV) are shared by the division machinery of both peroxisomes and mitochondria. Recently, it became clear that this is a common strategy used by mammals, fungi and plants. We propose a closer interrelationship between peroxisomes and mitochondria, which might have an impact on functionality and disease conditions. Furthermore, peroxisomes and mitochondria have been suggested to contribute to pathological conditions associated with oxidative stress and have as well been linked to aging. The central role of peroxisomes in the generation and scavenging of H2O2 has been well known ever since their discovery almost Wve decades ago. Recent Wndings on the biochemical properties of catalase and the abundant peroxisomal oxidases (e.g., D-amino acid oxidase, urate oxidase, xanthine oxidase) are highlighted by Alfred Volkl et al. (Heidelberg, Germany; Fig. 1; Angermuller et al. this issue). The cerium technique and immunoelectron microscopy have been successfully used to localize these enzymes in peroxiM. Schrader (&) Centre for Cell Biology and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal e-mail: mschrader@ua.pt
Read full abstract