Permanent Discontinuation Research Articles

Regorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Practice (REFINE): A Prospective, Observational Study

Introduction: In the phase 3 RESORCE trial, regorafenib prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) whose disease progressed on prior sorafenib. The prospective, observational REFINE study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in a broader population of patients in real-world clinical practice, including patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, Child–Pugh B liver status, and sorafenib-intolerance. Methods: This international, prospective, multicenter study (NCT03289273) enrolled patients with uHCC for whom the decision to treat with regorafenib was made by their physician before enrollment, according to the local health authority-approved label. The primary aim was to evaluate the safety of regorafenib, including the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dose modifications due to TEAEs. Results: Of the 1,028 patients enrolled, 1,005 initiated regorafenib and were eligible for analysis. Median age was 66 years (range 21–94); most patients were male (83%), Child–Pugh A (61%), and had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (82%) at study entry. Overall, 47%, 11%, and 40% of patients initiated regorafenib at 160, 120, and 80 mg/day, respectively. Median treatment duration was 3.7 months (range 1 day–38.9 months). Dose modifications and permanent discontinuation of regorafenib due to TEAEs occurred in 45% and 31% of patients, respectively. The most common drug-related TEAEs were hand–foot skin reaction (31%), diarrhea (26%), and fatigue (15%). Median OS was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval 11.6, 14.8). Conclusion: The results of the real-world REFINE study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in a broad population of patients with uHCC. Of patients who received standard regorafenib dosing in REFINE, safety and efficacy findings were consistent with those reported in the RESORCE trial.

Effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Black patients versus White patients in a US national health system: a retrospective cohort study.

Black patients were severely under-represented in the clinical trials that led to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for all cancers. The aim of this study was to characterise the effectiveness and safety of ICIs in Black patients. We did a retrospective cohort study of patients in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system's Corporate Data Warehouse containing electronic medical records for all patients who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black or African American (referred to as Black) or non-Hispanic White (referred to as White) and received PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, or LAG-3 inhibitors between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2023. Effectiveness outcomes were overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation, and time to next treatment. The safety outcome was the frequency of immune-related adverse events; assessed among a random sample of 1000 Black patients and 1000 White patients, 892 pairs were matched on the basis of baseline characteristics using 1:1 exact matching without replacement. After manual chart review, patients who did not receive ICI therapy or who had inadequate follow-up were excluded. The adjusted effect of race on each effectiveness outcome was assessed in the whole ICI-treated cohort with propensity-weighted Cox regression with robust standard errors. Immune-related adverse events outcomes were analysed in the random matched sample with multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics. We identified 26 398 patients, of whom 4943 (18·7%) patients were Black, 21 455 (81·3%) were White, 895 (3·4%) were female, 25 503 (96·6%) were male, 11 859 (45%) had non-small-cell lung cancer, and 26 045 (98·7%) received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. As of data cutoff (Aug 28, 2024), median follow-up was 40·3 months (95% CI 38·3-42·3) for Black patients and 43·9 months (43·0-45·1) for White patients. Compared with White patients, Black patients had longer time to treatment discontinuation (2-year unadjusted rates 10·7% [95% CI 9·8-11·7] for Black patients vs 8·6% [8·2-9·0] for White patients; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·91, 95% CI 0·87-0·95, p<0·0001), similar time to next treatment (23·5% [22·3-24·8] for Black patients vs 25·6% [25·0-26·2] for White patients; 1·00, 0·95-1·05, p=0·96), and slightly improved overall survival (36·5% [35·2-38·1] for Black patients vs 36·5% [35·8-37·1]; 0·95, 0·90-0·99, p=0·036). 1710 patients (n=862 Black and n=848 White) were analysed for safety outcomes. Compared with White patients, Black patients had a reduced risk of all-grade immune-related adverse events (unadjusted 2-year rate 33·1% [95% CI 28·9-37·1] vs 44·1% [95% CI 39·1-48·7]; adjusted HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·62-0·90, p=0·0026), immune-related adverse events requiring treatment with systemic steroids (0·61, 0·46-0·81, p=0·00051), and immune-related adverse events resulting in permanent ICI discontinuation (0·58, 0·44-0·78, p=0·00024). In exploratory analyses of irAE subtypes, a significant risk reduction in Black patients was found for colitis (0·46, 0·27-0·76, p=0·0026) and hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism (0·63, 0·44-0·90, p=0·011), and no significant differences were found for any other immune-related adverse event subtypes analysed. Similar results were found in analyses using a steroid-based definition of immune-related adverse events among the entire ICI-treated cohort. Compared with White patients, Black patients had similar ICI effectiveness and lower toxicities among those treated in the national VHA system, potentially reflecting an important difference in the therapeutic ratio (ratio of benefit to harm) of ICIs. Our findings of decreased toxicity among Black patients require further investigation to assess their generalisability. Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration and the LUNGevity foundation.

Prevalence of discussions around left atrial appendage occlusion as a treatment option in patients on oral anticoagulation experiencing a major bleeding event

BackgroundGuidelines recommend considering percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at moderate to high stroke risk and contraindications to long-term anticoagulation. Discontinuation of anticoagulation in this patient population, without an alternative treatment option, may place patients at unnecessary risk. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of discussions around LAAO as a treatment option following major bleeding adverse events in patients on oral anticoagulation for AF and to identify the proportion of patients stopping anticoagulation without evidence of LAAO discussions. MethodsFrom a single, large medical center in the United States, patients on an oral anticoagulant for AF and having at least one major bleeding adverse event, defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, between January 2015 and October 2023 were identified within a quality improvement registry. Information about LAAO discussions, subsequent procedures, and permanent discontinuation of anticoagulation was assessed using the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine and manual electronic medical record reviews. ResultsA total of 222 patients experienced major bleeding (54.5 % male, 86.9 % white, median age 77 years, 58.6 % on warfarin). From this group, 283 major bleeds were documented (44.2 % gastrointestinal, 17.7 % intracranial). LAAO discussions were documented in 51 patients (23 %), with LAAO procedures performed in 9 of these patients (17.6 %). After the major bleed, 54 (24.3 %) patients permanently stopped anticoagulation. Of these patients, 18 (33.3 %) had LAAO discussions prior to discontinuation and only 1 (1.9 %) had LAAO implantation. ConclusionsIn patients experiencing a major bleed, less than a quarter had documented discussions about LAAO and over a quarter permanently stopped anticoagulation.

Brief Report: Final overall survival and long-term safety of lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer from the pivotal phase 2 study

IntroductionLorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1 tyrosine kinases with broad coverage of ALK resistance mutations. We present overall survival (OS) and long-term safety of lorlatinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the final analyses of the pivotal phase 2 study. MethodsAdults with ALK-positive NSCLC, enrolled in expansion cohorts based on prior therapy (EXP1-5), received lorlatinib 100 mg orally once daily in continuous 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included OS and safety. ResultsThirty patients were enrolled in EXP1 (treatment naïve), 59 in EXP2-3A (disease progression following crizotinib ± chemotherapy), 28 in EXP3B (disease progression following one second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI] ± chemotherapy), 111 in EXP4-5 (disease progression following ≥2 ALK TKIs ± chemotherapy), and 139 in EXP3B-5 (disease progression following ≥1 ALK TKI ± chemotherapy). Median OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, NR-NR) in EXP1, NR (95% CI, 51.5-NR) in EXP2-3A, 37.4 months (95% CI, 12.3-NR) in EXP3B, 19.2 months (95% CI, 15.4-30.2) in EXP4-5, and 20.7 months (95% CI, 16.1-30.3) in EXP3B-5. All-cause adverse events leading to dose reduction were reported in 77 (28%) patients, temporary treatment discontinuation in 158 (57%), and permanent discontinuation in 35 (13%). ConclusionsAfter a minimum follow-up of 5 years, final analyses from the global phase 2 study confirmed substantial activity, prolonged OS, and generally consistent safety findings with lorlatinib in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related diabetes mellitus: incidence, clinical features, management, and prognosis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related diabetes mellitus (ICI-DM) is a rare complication that medical oncologists seldom encounter in routine practice. The sporadic nature and intrinsic complexity of ICI-DM make it challenging to analyze comprehensively in experimental settings. In this review, we examine phase 3 clinical trials on ICIs and published case reports of ICI-DM, aiming to summarize its incidence, clinical features, management, and prognosis. Phase 3 clinical trials reveal that the incidence of ICI-DM is higher with combination therapies, such as anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-L1, compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. ICI-DM typically presents as severe hyperglycemia with a fulminant onset and is often associated with diabetic ketoacidosis, accompanied by unexpectedly low HbA1c and C-peptide levels. ICI-DM shares similarities with classic type 1 diabetes, particularly in terms of autoimmunity and genetic predisposition. This includes a high prevalence of islet autoantibodies and susceptibility to certain HLA haplotypes, often with concurrent endocrine gland dysfunction. This suggests that genetic susceptibility and exposure to ICIs may both be necessary for triggering islet autoimmunity and inducing ICI-DM. Notably, patients with positive islet autoantibodies, such as glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody and islet-associated antigen 2 antibody, tend to experience rapid onset of ICI-DM after ICI exposure. Although patients with ICI-DM generally show a high objective response rate to immunotherapy, a significant proportion also face the need to permanently discontinued treatment. Further research is urgently needed to determine whether permanent discontinuation of immunotherapy is necessary and whether this discontinuation negatively impacts overall survival.

Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Persons with Obesity and Knee Osteoarthritis

BackgroundWeight reduction has been shown to alleviate symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee, including pain. The effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on outcomes in knee osteoarthritis among persons with obesity has not been well studied.MethodsWe conducted a 68-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at 61 sites in 11 countries. Participants with obesity (a body-mass index [BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters] of ≥30) and a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of moderate knee osteoarthritis with at least moderate pain were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (2.4 mg) or placebo, in addition to counseling on physical activity and a reduced-calorie diet. The primary end points were the percentage change in body weight and the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting worse outcomes) from baseline to week 68. A key confirmatory secondary end point was the physical-function score on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), version 2 (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater well-being).ResultsA total of 407 participants were enrolled. The mean age was 56 years, the mean BMI 40.3, and the mean WOMAC pain score 70.9. A total of 81.6% of the participants were women. The mean change in body weight from baseline to week 68 was −13.7% with semaglutide and −3.2% with placebo (P<0.001). The mean change in the WOMAC pain score at week 68 was −41.7 points with semaglutide and −27.5 points with placebo (P<0.001). Participants in the semaglutide group had a greater improvement in SF-36 physical-function score than those in the placebo group (mean change, 12.0 points vs. 6.5 points; P<0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. Adverse events that led to permanent discontinuation of the trial regimen occurred in 6.7% of the participants in the semaglutide group and in 3.0% in the placebo group, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common reason for discontinuation.ConclusionsAmong participants with obesity and knee osteoarthritis with moderate-to-severe pain, treatment with once-weekly injectable semaglutide resulted in significantly greater reductions in body weight and pain related to knee osteoarthritis than placebo. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; STEP 9 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05064735.)

Clinical Recommendations for Managing Genitourinary Adverse Effects in Patients Treated with SGLT-2 Inhibitors: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus.

Background: SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are considered to be a first-line treatment for common conditions like type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure due to their proven ability to reduce cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. Despite these benefits, SGLT-2is are associated with certain adverse effects (AEs), particularly genitourinary (GU) events, which can lead to treatment discontinuation in some patients. Preventing these AEs is essential for maintaining the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2is. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of experts from various medical specialties reviewed the best available evidence on GU AEs associated with SGLT-2i therapy. The panel focused on the prevention and management of genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, and lower urinary tract symptoms in both the general population and high-risk groups, such as renal and cardiac transplant recipients. Results: The panel found that permanent discontinuation of SGLT-2is results in a rapid loss of cardiorenal benefits. Preventive strategies, including identifying high-risk patients before initiating therapy, are critical for minimizing GU AEs. Clinical trials show that most GU infections linked to SGLT-2i therapy are mild to moderate in severity and typically respond to standard antimicrobial treatment, without the need for discontinuation. Conclusions: Routine discontinuation of SGLT-2is due to GU AEs is not recommended. Therapy should be resumed as soon as possible, unless severe or persistent conditions contraindicate their use, in order to preserve the significant benefits of SGLT-2is in reducing cardiovascular and renal events.

Treatment patterns for advanced therapies in Canadians with moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective cohort analysis

Abstract Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) show an inadequate response or experience a loss of response to advanced therapies. Guidelines recommend dose optimization and switching among therapies until an optimal treatment response is attained. With several advanced treatments available, we aimed to evaluate the persistence of different therapeutic sequences in IBD. The RECORDED study was a retrospective cohort study of Canadians with moderate-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) who had been exposed to more than 1 advanced therapy between May 2015 and April 2021 for UC, and May 2016 and April 2021 for CD. The primary endpoint was time to permanent discontinuation of the first advanced treatment. Overall, 330 patients had CD and 344 had UC. The most common first-line treatments for CD and UC were adalimumab and infliximab, respectively. The median (95% CI) time to permanent discontinuation of first-line treatment was 12.3 (10.9, 13.6) months in patients with CD and 9.2 (8.2, 10.8) months for those with UC. The most common reason for treatment change across both diseases was lack of efficacy. First-line advanced treatments were optimized in 191 (58.1%) CD patients and 202 (59.1%) UC patients prior to permanent discontinuation. Second-line therapy was typically from a different class compared with the first-line treatment choice. The RECORDED study provides insights into the real-world sequencing and optimization patterns of advanced treatments in patients with moderate-to-severe IBD in Canada. Lack of efficacy was the most cited reason for switching to a different therapy.

Serial changes in left and right ventricular global longitudinal strain in symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treated with mavacamten: insights from VALOR-HCM trial

Abstract Background In severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the VALOR-HCM phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial demonstrated that mavacamten, reduces the need for septal reduction therapy with sustained improvement in left ventricular outflow tract gradients and symptoms. As a cardiac myosin inhibitor, mavacamten’s mechanism of action reduces myocardial hypercontractility. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), a measure of regional myocardial function, is a more sensitive marker of systolic function and can complement left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Objective We sought to assess serial changes in LV and right ventricular (RV)-GLS in patients enrolled in the VALOR-HCM study. Methods VALOR-HCM included 112 symptomatic obstructive HCM patients (mean 60 years, 51% male, LVEF 68%). Patients assigned to mavacamten at baseline continued the drug for 56 weeks (n=56) and those assigned to placebo crossed over to mavacamten (n=52) from week 16-56 (40-week exposure). LV and RV-GLS assessment was performed according to the current American and European guideline recommendations using a vendor-neutral post processing software. Non-foreshortened apical (4, 3 and 2-chamber) views were used to obtain peak value of LV-GLS. For RV-GLS, RV focused 4-chamber view was used to calculate RV 4-chamber and free wall strain. A more negative strain value is favorable. Results Serial changes in LVEF, average LV-GLS, and RV-GLS (4-chamber and free wall) from baseline to week 56 are shown in the Figure. Despite preserved LVEF at baseline, average baseline LV-GLS was abnormal. There were significant and continued improvements in LV-GLS in the total group from baseline to week 56. 12 patients had transient reduction in LVEF (&amp;lt;50%) requiring temporary drug interruption (permanent discontinuation in 3). The LV-GLS in this subgroup was worse at baseline compared to the total study population, with no significant worsening from baseline through week 56. In the overall population, excluding these 12 patients, LV-GLS demonstrated an improvement sustained through week 56. Both free wall and 4-chamber RV-GLS were abnormal at baseline and remained unchanged from baseline to week 56. Conclusions In the VALOR-HCM trial, despite hypercontractile LVEF at baseline, average baseline LV-GLS was worse than normal reference values. Treatment with mavacamten resulted in an improvement in LV-GLS from baseline through Week 56 (with no significant worsening of LV-GLS in the subgroup who experienced any reduction in LVEF &amp;lt;50%), suggesting a favorable long-term impact on regional LV systolic function due to the reduction of cardiac hypercontractility. Additionally, there was no significant detrimental impact on RV systolic function on serial GLS assessment.Serial changes in LV and RV GLS in VALOR

The safety and feasibility of colchicine uptitration in the management of idiopathic recurrent pericarditis

Abstract Introduction Colchicine is recommended first line in the management of idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) at low doses (0.5 - 1 mg/24h). In cases refractory to low dose colchicine, corticosteroid use is common, despite an increased risk of disease recurrence and the risk of complications resulting from corticosteroid dependence. Biologic agents that block interleukin-1, anakinra and rilonacept, are highly effective in IRP, but their use is limited by expertise and cost. Colchicine uptitration is recommended by consensus international guidance in familial Mediterranean fever, a disease characterised by recurrent serositis, and, hence, offers an accessible steroid sparing approach to the management of treatment-refractory idiopathic recurrent pericarditis Purpose To explore the safety and feasibility of colchicine uptitration in patients with IRP refractory to low dose colchicine (0.5-1 mg/24h). Methods Retrospective review of electronic medical records of all patients with IRP and familial Mediterranean fever reviewed at a tertiary centre 2013-2023. Treatment-refractory IRP cases were defined as active disease despite colchicine 1mg/24h or disease requiring other prophylactic drugs, and corticosteroid dependence as daily corticosteroid use for 6 months. Results Of 121 IRP cases, 77 (63.6%) were treatment refractory at first review. Median follow up was 24 months (IQR 6 – 36). Corticosteroid dependence complicated 34/77 (44.2%) cases. Of treatment-refractory cases without corticosteroid dependence, 42/43 (97.7%) were treated with colchicine uptitration and 4/43 (9.3%) with anti-interleukin-1 biologic(s); none became corticosteroid dependent. Of corticosteroid dependent cases, 30/34 (88.2%) were treated with colchicine uptitration and 13/34 (38.2%) with anti-interleukin-1 biologic(s). Corticosteroids were fully discontinued in 25/34 (73.5%): 8/25 (32.0%) weaned with colchicine uptitration alone, 14/25 (56.0%) with anti-interleukin-1 biologic(s) and 3/21 (14.3%) with azathioprine. Median corticosteroid duration was 17.5 months (IQR 13 - 44.25) and corticosteroid toxicity occurred in 8/34 (23.5%). Among the 76/77 cases (98.7%) treated with colchicine (median maintenance dose 2 mg/24h (IQR 1.5-2)), permanent discontinuation was uncommon (3/76, 3.9%) and due to gastrointestinal symptoms. Self-limiting liver transaminase elevation was common (29/76, 38.2%) but did not lead to discontinuation in any case. The prevalence of liver transaminase elevation among patients with familial Mediterranean fever on life long colchicine was 181/568 (31.9%). Conclusions In this treatment-refractory pericarditis cohort, colchicine uptitration enabled avoidance of new corticosteroid dependence, facilitated corticosteroid discontinuation and was well tolerated. This contrasts with the frequent toxicity seen with prolonged corticosteroid use and offers an accessible steroid sparing approach to IRP management that warrants prospective investigation.

Persistence and predictors for non-persistence to edoxaban therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: 4-year follow-up data from the ETNA-AF-Europe study

Abstract Background Non-persistence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is associated with increased stroke risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. To date, most NOAC persistence studies have been retrospective and often did not include patients receiving edoxaban. Identifying predictors for non-persistence may be useful when considering the design of future studies and help develop strategies to reduce non-persistence in clinical practice. Purpose To define and describe patients who did not reach the end of the study period and were non-persistent to edoxaban during the 4-year follow-up of ETNA-AF-Europe. Methods ETNA-AF-Europe was a prospective, observational study conducted in AF patients receiving edoxaban. In this subanalysis, patients not reaching the end of the study period and patients who were non-persistent (defined as permanent discontinuation of edoxaban) after 4 years of treatment were examined, including patients switching to other NOACs and reasons for discontinuation. Baseline predictors for not reaching the end of the study period and baseline predictors for non-persistence with edoxaban treatment during 4 years of follow-up were also examined. Persistent patients may have missed dose/interruption. Results Overall, 13,164 patients were included in the analysis. During the whole study period, 14.3% died. At the end of the study, 27.3% of patients prematurely terminated the study and 71.5% were classified as completing the study. Of patients who left the study (n=3598), 30.2% were lost-to-follow-up, 6.9% withdrew consent, and 5.9% transferred to another institution. Of patients who completed the study (n=9417), 87.4% were classified as persistent within the 4 years. Only 6.2% permanently discontinued edoxaban without switching to another NOAC (Table). Following backwards elimination, baseline characteristics associated with premature study termination (excluding death) were male sex, low body mass index, low renal function, chronic hepatic disease, long standing persistent/permanent AF, smoking, low compliance as judged by investigator, vitamin K antagonist-naïve, and no rate/rhythm control drug at baseline. Characteristics associated with non-persistence were increasing age, male sex, body weight extremes, low renal function, heart failure, vascular disease, chronic hepatic disease, alcohol use, perceived frailty, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking, current AF symptoms, and ablation (Figure). The criterion for backward elimination was p=0.05. Conclusions Most patients in ETNA-AF-Europe reached the end of the study. Less than a quarter were classified as non-persistent during the 4-year follow-up. The majority of patients who were non-persistent switched to another NOAC with a small number completely stopping anticoagulant therapy. Male sex, low renal function, chronic hepatic disease, and smoking were associated with both treatment discontinuation and non-persistence.Termination and persistence

Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in antiamyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease: a narrative review

Summary Antiamyloid therapies have sparked a new hope for a potential disease-modifying therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Antiamyloid therapy targets amyloid-beta, which is a key feature of the disease. However, adverse effects such as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) have raised significant concerns about the safety of these therapies. ARIA, which includes vasogenic edema (ARIA-E) and microhemorrhages or hemosiderosis (ARIA-H), is a common adverse effect to antiamyloid therapies. Patient-related risk factors for ARIA include carrying the APOE-ε4 allele and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Drug-related risk factors for ARIA include higher drug doses, early initiation of treatment, and concomitant use of antithrombotic medications, all of which increase the likelihood of vascular disruptions. Management of ARIA involves regular MRI monitoring and possibly temporary or permanent discontinuation of therapy if adverse effects develop during therapy. A gradual dose titration is recommended to minimize the risk of ARIA. Although antiamyloid therapies have demonstrated efficacy in reducing amyloid burden, the clinical benefit remains at best modest and must be weighed against the risks of developing adverse effects such as ARIA.

Patient Profile-Based Management with Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

A severe and progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD) known as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has an unknown etiology with poorly defined mechanisms of development. Among the currently prescribed pharmacological interventions for IPF, nintedanib demonstrates the ability to decelerate the deterioration of lung function and yield positive clinical outcomes. Multiple randomized placebo-controlled trials have confirmed the efficacy and acceptable safety profile of nintedanib. Real-world evidence studies also support the use of nintedanib in IPF, being an efficient and well-tolerated treatment option. It has the potential to stabilize the disease progression in patients with ILD. Patients with IPF frequently have comorbidities like diabetes and hypertension, which can exacerbate the course of disease, reduce quality of life, and decrease treatment adherence. For well-informed decision-making, it is important for healthcare professionals to recognize the position of nintedanib therapy in IPF with comorbidities. The gastrointestinal adverse effects, notably diarrhea, dominate the nintedanib safety profile. These can be effectively controlled by closely monitoring side effects, administering anti-diarrheal and anti-emetic drugs, reducing the nintedanib dose, and discontinuing it in case of severe symptoms with an option to reintroduce the treatment after side effects subside. Symptomatic interventions and monitoring of liver enzymes may reduce the occurrence of permanent treatment discontinuations.

Evaluation of bleeding risk in patients who received pirtobrutinib in the presence or absence of antithrombotic therapy.

Clinical bleeding events are reported here from 773 patients with B-cell malignancies receiving pirtobrutinib monotherapy from the phase 1/2 BRUIN study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03740529), either in the presence or absence of antithrombotic therapy (antithrombotic exposed [AT-E], n=216; antithrombotic nonexposed [AT-NE], n=557). Among the AT-E cohort, 51.9% received platelet aggregation inhibitors, 36.6% received direct factor Xa inhibitors, 18.5% received heparins, 5.6% received salicylic acid for indications other than platelet aggregation inhibition, and 2.3% received thrombolytics. Warfarin was not permitted. Any-grade bleeding/bruising events occurred in 97 patients (44.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38.3-51.5) in the AT-E cohort and 181 patients (32.5%; 95% CI, 28.6-36.4) in the AT-NE cohort. Most bleeding/bruising events in both cohorts began within the first 6 months of treatment (AT-E: 65.4%; AT-NE: 72.5%). Contusion was the most common bleeding/bruising event in both cohorts (AT-E: 22.7%; AT-NE: 18.1%). Grade ≥3 bleeding/bruising events were reported in six patients (2.8%) in the AT-E cohort and 11 patients (2.0%) in the AT-NE cohort. Bleeding/bruising events requiring or prolonging hospitalization were reported in 2.3% and 1.6% of patients in the AT-E and AT-NE cohorts, respectively. No bleeding/bruising events led to pirtobrutinib dose reduction or permanent discontinuation in the AT-E cohort, and one patient (0.2%) in the AT-NE cohort experienced an event requiring dose reduction. These data support the safety of pirtobrutinib in patients requiring antithrombotic therapies.

Ipilimumab with nivolumab in molecularly selected patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: primary analysis of the phase II INSPIRE trial

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) typically exhibits resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, a subset of mCRPC patients displays a more immunogenic profile. This study examines efficacy and safety of dual ICI therapy in molecularly selected mCRPC. This single-arm, phase II trial included 69 molecularly selected mCRPC patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), non-synonymous tumour mutational burden ≥7.1 muts/Mb (hTMB), a BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm), or biallelic CDK12 inactivation (CDK12i). Efficacy was assessed in ICI-naïve patients (cohort A) with RECIST 1.1 (A1) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (A2) measurable disease. Safety was evaluated in cohorts A and B (prior ICI monotherapy). Treatment included nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint was disease control rate beyond 6 months (DCR > 6), aiming to surpass a DCR > 6 of 22%. Patients initiated treatment between January 2021 and February 2024. Cohort A included 65 patients. Of these, 21 had dMMR (32%), 8 had hTMB (12%), 20 had BRCAm (31%), and 16 had CDK12i (25%). DCR > 6 was achieved in 38% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 27% to 51%], and was highest in dMMR (81%), followed by hTMB (25%), CDK12i (19%), and BRCAm (15%). Objective response rate in cohort A was 38% (95% CI 22% to 55%) and 47% (95% CI 34% to 60%) exhibited a 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen levels. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.5-12.0 months) in cohort A, and 32.7 months (95% CI 21.8 months-not reached) in dMMR patients. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) led to permanent discontinuation in 14 of 69 patients (20%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 48% of patients, with diarrhoea and elevated transaminases each in 10%. There was one treatment-related death due to a bowel perforation and a second following euthanasia after grade 4 toxicity. This trial of dual ICIs in molecularly selected mCRPC met its primary endpoint, showing DCR > 6 in 38% of patients. Dual ICIs exhibited modest responses in the hTMB, BRCAm, and CDK12i subgroups, but demonstrated exceptional efficacy in dMMR.

Choice of Frontline Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor and Early Events in Very Elderly Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A "Campus CML" Study.

The study aimed to evaluate the utilization of frontline TKI therapy in a large cohort of elderly CP-CML patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 332 CP-CML patients aged 75 years or older among 1929 diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2019 followed at 36 participating Hematology Centers involved in the "Campus CML" project. Among the patients analyzed, 85.8% received imatinib (IM) while 14.2% received second-generation TKIs (2G-TKI), 59.5% dasatinib, and 40.5% nilotinib. Most patients initiated IM at standard dose (67.3%) while 32.7% at reduced dose. A similar trend was observed with 2G-TKIs. The cumulative incidence of permanent TKI discontinuation at 12 months was 28.4%, primarily due to primary resistance (10.1%) and extra-hematologic toxicity (9.5%), with no significant difference between IM and 2G-TKI groups. Following the introduction of generic IM in Italy in 2018, IM usage increased significantly compared with 2G-TKIs. IM was in our Centers the preferred frontline therapy for older CP-CML patients, with increasing utilization after the introduction of generic formulations. However, 2G-TKIs are still used in a substantial proportion of patients, suggesting individualized physician assessments regarding patient suitability and expectations. Further investigation is needed to assess efficacy and safety of reduced TKI doses in this patient population.

Resistance Training and Nutritional Supplementation in Older Adults with Sarcopenia after Acute Disease: A Feasibility Study.

Resistance exercise and protein supplementation are recognized as effective treatment strategies for age-related sarcopenia; however, there are limited data on their feasibility, tolerability, and safety. The primary outcome of this study was feasibility, evaluated through the 15-item TELOS (Technological, Economics, Legal, Operational, and Scheduling) feasibility components and by recruitment, retention, and consent rates. Tolerability was measured by examining permanent treatment discontinuation, treatment interruption, exercise dose modification, early termination, rescheduling of missed sessions, losses to follow-up, attendance, and nutritional compliance. Safety was evaluated using the parameters provided by the European Medicines Agency, adapted for exercise interventions. Thirty-two subjects were recruited (average age 81.6 [SD 9.3] years). The TELOS components were assessed before the intervention; out of 15 questions relevant for successful implementation, 4 operational needs answers required specific actions to prevent potential barriers. The recruitment rate was 74%. Eleven patients (34.4%) had permanent treatment interruption (retention rate = 65.6%). Patients attended a mean of 23 (SD 12.0) exercise sessions, with a mean of 56 (SD 32.6) nutritional compliances. A total of 21 patients (65.6%) experienced adverse events unrelated to the intervention, while 7 patients (21.9%) presented adverse reactions to strength exercise. The main barriers to feasibility were operational components and recruitment challenges. Although the intervention was generally safe, the high rate of probable adverse effects, unrelated to the intervention but associated with the individual's baseline health condition, may affect adherence to treatment programs of this kind.

Early Identification and Management of Patients with Rash on Apalutamide.

Apalutamide is a selective androgen receptor signalling inhibitor that is used in the treatment of prostate cancer. Skin rash is one of the most common adverse events with apalutamide. Although the majority of rash events are grade 1 and 2, the appearance of skin rash during treatment can lead to dose reduction, a pause in treatment or even treatment discontinuation, especially if patients present late when the rash has become severe. This in turn can result in a significant delay or even a permanent discontinuation in the patient's treatment of prostate cancer. As apalutamide is a generally well tolerated and an effective treatment for many men with advanced prostate cancer, it is extremely important to make attempts to prevent skin problems or to manage them at the earliest stage possible. We therefore have developed practical guidance for the management of apalutamide-related rash, including an infographic with recommendations for rash management by grade. Central to this approach is patient education and awareness. Encouraging patients to proactively care for their skin from the start of treatment and informing them of the risk of rash with apalutamide therapy are essential. If the patient observes any skin changes, they should be advised to report it straight away to their cancer care team. Adopting this simple, proactive approach of patient education and increased vigilance from the care team is expected to lead to early identification of rash and subsequent intervention to allow for quicker resolution and enable patients to continue their cancer treatment with a drug that can delay disease progression and increase survival in patients with prostate cancer.

Serial Changes in Ventricular Strain in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Treated With Mavacamten: Insights From the VALOR-HCM Trial.

In severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, VALOR-HCM (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy) demonstrated that mavacamten reduces the need for septal reduction therapy with sustained improvement in left ventricular (LV) outflow tract gradients and symptoms. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), a measure of regional myocardial function, is a more sensitive marker of systolic function. In VALOR-HCM, we assessed serial changes in LV and right ventricular (RV) strain. VALOR-HCM included 112 patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (mean, 60 years; 51% male; LV ejection fraction, 68%). Patients assigned to mavacamten at baseline continued the drug for 56 weeks (n=56) and those assigned to placebo (n=52) transitioned to mavacamten from weeks 16 to 56 (40-week exposure). LV-GLS and RV-GLS assessment was performed using a vendor-neutral software. Non-foreshortened apical (4-, 3-, and 2-chamber) views were used to obtain peak LV-GLS. RV focused 4-chamber view was used to calculate RV 4-chamber and free wall strain. A more negative strain value is favorable. At baseline, the mean LV-GLS, RV 4-chamber, and free wall strain values were -14.7%, -22.2%, and -16.8%, respectively (all worse than reported normal means). In the total study sample, LV-GLS significantly improved from baseline to week 56 (P=0.02). Twelve patients had transient reduction in LV ejection fraction (<50%) requiring temporary drug interruption (including 3 permanent discontinuations). The LV-GLS in this subgroup was worse at baseline versus total study population (-11.4%), with no significant worsening from baseline through week 56 (P=0.64). Both free wall and 4-chamber RV-GLS remained unchanged from baseline to week 56 (P=0.62 and P=0.56, respectively). In VALOR-HCM, treatment with mavacamten improved LV-GLS from baseline through week 56 (with no significant worsening of LV-GLS in patients with a reduction in LV ejection fraction ≤50%), suggesting a favorable long-term impact on regional LV systolic function. Additionally, there was no detrimental impact on RV systolic function. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04349072.

Eftilagimod Alpha (a Soluble LAG-3 Protein) Combined With Pembrolizumab in Second-Line Metastatic NSCLC Refractory to Anti–Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Based Therapy: Final Results from a Phase 2 Study

IntroductionEftilagimod alpha (efti), a soluble lymphocyte activation gene-3 protein, triggers antigen-presenting cell and T-cell (CD4+ and CD8+) activation and helps overcome resistance to programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitors. We assessed efti plus pembrolizumab in second-line anti–PD-(L)1-refractory metastatic patients with NSCLC. MethodsAfter confirmed progression on anti-PD-(L)1-based first-line therapy, patients received efti (30 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for eight 3-week cycles and then every 3 weeks for up to 54 weeks) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 105 weeks). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 for immune-based therapies. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and tolerability. Exploratory endpoints included tumor growth kinetics and predefined subgroup analyses. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score was assessed centrally. ResultsThirty-six patients were enrolled from April 2019 to August 2021 using Simon’s two-stage design. Most patients (81.8%) had low or negative (<50%) PD-(L)1 tumor proportion score. First-line therapy was anti–PD-(L)1-based for all patients, combined with chemotherapy for 66.7%. The confirmed objective response and disease control rates were 8.3% and 33.3%. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months and the median OS was 9.9 months. Patients exhibiting high PD-(L)1 expression or acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibitors revealed superior response and survival outcomes, and OS was closely correlated with disease control. No treatment-emergent adverse event led to permanent discontinuation of study treatment. ConclusionsEfti plus pembrolizumab was well-tolerated and revealed signs of antitumor activity in patients with NSCLC resistant to PD-(L)1 inhibitors, warranting further investigation. Trial registration number: NCT03625323.