Permanent Prostate Research Articles

Current status of the working environment of brachytherapy in Japan: a nationwide survey-based analysis focusing on radiotherapy technologists and medical physicists.

Brachytherapy (BT), especially in high dose rate (HDR), has become increasingly complex owing to the use of image-guided techniques and the introduction of advanced applicators. Consequently, radiotherapy technologists and medical physicists (RTMPs) require substantial training to enhance their knowledge and technical skills in image-guided brachytherapy. However, the current status of the RTMP workload, individual abilities and quality control (QC) of BT units in Japan remains unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a questionnaire survey from June to August 2022 in all 837 radiation treatment facilities in Japan involving RTMPs. This survey focused on gynecological cancers treated with HDR-BT (GY-HDR) and permanent prostate implantation using low-dose-rate BT (PR-LDR). The responses revealed that the average working time in the overall process for HDR varied: 120min for intracavitary BT and 180min for intracavitary BT combined with interstitial BT. The QC implementation rate, in accordance with domestic guidelines, was 65% for GY-HDR and 44% for PR-LDR, which was lower than the 69% observed for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Additionally, the implementation rate during regular working hours was low. Even among RTMP working in facilities performing BT, the proportion of those able to perform QC for BT units was ~30% for GY-HDR and <20% for PR-LDR, significantly lower than the 80% achieved for EBRT. This study highlights the vulnerabilities of Japan's BT unit QC implementation structure. Addressing these issues requires appropriate training of the RTMP staff to safely perform BT tasks and improvements in practical education and training systems.

Patient factors affecting the distribution of hydrogel spacers in combination with permanent prostate brachytherapy

Patient factors affecting the distribution of hydrogel spacers in combination with permanent prostate brachytherapy

A unified strategy to focal brachytherapy incorporating transperineal biopsy, image fusion, and real-time implantation with and without rectal spacer simulated in prostate phantoms.

To develop an approach to the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer using one platform for fusion biopsy, followed by focal gland ablation utilizing permanent prostate brachytherapy with and without a rectal spacer. Prostate phantoms containing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) regions of interest (ROI) underwent fusion biopsy, followed by image co-registration of positive sites to a treatment planning brachytherapy program. A partial hemi-ablation and both posterior lobes using a Mick applicator and linked stranded seeds were simulated. Dummy sources were modeled as iodine-125 (125I) with a prescribed dose of at least 210 Gy to gross tumor (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV), as defined by mpMRI visible ROI and surrounding negative biopsy sites. Computer tomograms (CT) were performed post-implant prior to and after rectal spacer insertion. Different prostate and rectal constraints were compared with and without the spacer. The intra-operative focal volumes of CTV ranged from 6.2 to 14.9 cc (mean, 11.3 cc), and the ratio of focal volume/whole prostate volume ranged between 0.19 and 0.42 (mean, 0.31). The intra- and post-operative mean focal D90 of GTV, CTV, and for the entire prostate gland was 265 Gy and 235 Gy, 214 Gy and 213 Gy, and 66.1 Gy and 57 Gy, respectively. On average, 13 mm separation was achieved between the prostate and the rectum (range, 12-14 mm) on post-operative CT. The mean doses in Gy to 2 cc of the rectum (D2cc) without spacer vs. with spacer were 39.8 Gy vs. 32.6 Gy, respectively. Doses above 200 Gy and the implantation of seeds in clinically significant region for focal therapy in phantoms are feasible. All rectal dosimetric parameters improved for the spacer implants, as compared with the non-spacer implants. Further validation of this concept is warranted in clinical trials.

PO53: Comparative Characterization of Seed-Displacements Until Day 1 and Day 30 of Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy: Necessity and Implications for Adaptive Implantation Workflows

PO53: Comparative Characterization of Seed-Displacements Until Day 1 and Day 30 of Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy: Necessity and Implications for Adaptive Implantation Workflows

PO94: Edema and Stranded Seed Dynamics in Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography

PO94: Edema and Stranded Seed Dynamics in Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography

LDR brachytherapy offers superior tumor control to single-fraction HDR prostate brachytherapy: A prospective study.

To compare the clinical outcomes of single-fraction high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and single-fraction low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as the sole treatment for primary prostate cancer. A quasi-randomized study that allocated, from March 2008 to February 2012, 129 low and intermediate risk prostate cancer patients to one single-fraction HDR of 19 Gy (61 patients) or to a 145 Gy 125 I LDR permanent implant (68 patients. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. After a median follow-up of 72 months in the HDR group, 26 patients relapsed, and after a median follow-up of 84 months in the LDR group, 7 patients relapsed (p < 0.0001). The 5-year bRFS was significantly better for the LDR group than for the HDR group (93.7% and 61.1%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The 5-year OS also was significantly better in the LDR group (95.5% vs. 89.9%) (p = 0.0436). Permanent LDR prostate implant brachytherapy offers better clinical outcomes than single-fraction HDR for prostate cancer.

Relationship between changes in quality of life and genitourinary toxicity grade after brachytherapy with I-125 alone for localised prostate cancer.

The relationship between the grading of toxicities based on toxicity criteria and longitudinal changes in quality of life (QOL) scores after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) for localized prostate cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate these relationships. We assessed 107 patients treated with PPB using Iodine-125 alone from May 2007 to April 2010. Disease-specific QOL scores before PPB and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after PPB were retrospectively evaluated with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), focusing on urinary domains. Toxicities were graded using the Radiation therapy oncology group and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer toxicity criteria. The median follow-up duration was 116 (range 18-148) months. Thirty-four patients (31.8%) developed grade ≥ 2 acute genitourinary (GU) toxicities; six (5.6%) developed grade ≥ 2 late GU toxicities. The general urinary domain score dropped significantly at 1 month (77.1 ± 14.1) post-PPB compared to the baseline score (92.2 ± 8.2), and then gradually returned to the baseline level by 12 months (93.7 ± 8.3) post-PPB. Reductions in the general urinary domain scores, including its subscale scores at 1, 3, and 6-months post-PPB were significantly greater among patients with grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity than among those with grade 0-1 GU toxicity. Changes in urinary domain scores demonstrated a close relationship with acute GU toxicity grades after PPB. Longitudinal assessments of the EPIC QOL scores provided additional information regarding time-course changes in GU toxicities after PPB.

Seed-displacements in the immediate post-implant phase in permanent prostate brachytherapy

PurposeTo investigate differences in seed-displacements between the immediate post-implant phase (day 0–1) and the time to post-plan computed tomography (CT) (day 1–30) in seed prostate brachytherapy. Materials and methodsSeed positions were identified on the intra-operatively created ultrasound-based treatment plan (day 0) and CT scans of day 1 and 30 for 33 patients. The day 1 (30) seed arrangement was registered onto the day 0 (1) arrangement using a seed-only approach. Based on a 1:1 assignment of seeds via the Kuhn-Munkres algorithm, seed-displacements were analyzed. Displacements were evaluated depending on strand-length and anatomical implant location. Resulting dosimetric effects were calculated. ResultsSeed-displacements in the immediate post-implant phase (median displacements: 3.8 ± 3.6 mm) were stronger than in the time to post-plan CT (2.1 ± 2.6 mm) and enhanced along the superior-inferior direction. From day 0 to 1, strands containing one (7.3 ± 5.4 mm) or two (8.1 ± 5.8 mm) seeds showed larger displacements than strands of higher lengths (up to 4.2 ± 7.0 mm), whereas no length-dependency was found to day 30. Seeds implanted in base and apex tended to move towards the prostate midzone during both time periods. D90 (dose that 90% of prostate receives) was with variations of 2 ± 15 Gy more stable from day 1 to 30 than in the immediate post-implant phase (−18 ± 11 Gy). ConclusionSeed-displacements in the immediate post-implant phase was enhanced compared to day 1–30. This may result from uncertainties in the gold-standard ultrasound-based treatment planning and implantation. Adaptive implantation workflows appear useful for ensuring high implant stability from the beginning.

Technical Report: Quality Assurance for 125I Seed Sources in Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy

This technical report provides useful information on the current status and issues of quality control in 125I seed source strength measurement for Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy in Japan.With the spread of 125I seed brachytherapy, the traceability of source strength measurements with the single-seed assay was established in Japan. This allows medical facilities to measure reference air kerma rate of 125I seeds with their own well-type of ionization chamber. However, it is difficult to maintain the traceability chain because the 125I reference air kerma rate standards have been hardly utilized by medical facilities so far. Meanwhile, some serious incidents of contamination of the different source strengths and dead seeds were reported in Japan.To address the specific issues in Japan, JASTRO Brachytherapy Subcommittee established a working group (WG) in 2021. The goal of this WG is to investigate the management methods of source strength measurement used in medical facilities, and to discuss the ideal and practicable methods of source management such as verifying the number of seeds and source strength. Initially, a questionnaire survey was conducted to facilities offering 125I seed brachytherapy in Japan. Sixty-seven out of 95 facilities responded (response rate 70.5%). This survey revealed that 41% of facilities did not perform either confirmation of the number of seeds or measurement of source strength. There are several reasons why the source strength was not measured in those facilities. For example, 125I seeds are provided under the sterilized conditions; quality assurance by source suppliers is reliable; and there is not sufficient staff.The single-seed assay is regarded as an internationally standardized and the most reliable measurement method. Therefore, it is an essential measurement technique to ensure traceability of source strength measurements. However, our survey found that most Japanese facilities do not perform single-seed assays. Meanwhile, some facilities have performed batch assay as an alternative method, in which all of the multiple sources in a batch are measured while loaded into sterilized cartridges. Although the measurement by the batch assay is less accurate than the one by the single-seeded assay, the batch assay does not require re-sterilization of the source and can be performed quickly. It might be useful to detect unexpected errors such as differences in the number of sources and abnormalities in source strength.In this report, we will introduce several methods of source strength measurement that have been implemented in medical facilities. The quality assurance of 125I seed sources in prostate interstitial brachytherapy should be provided not only by the source suppliers but also by the medical facilities that use sources to treat patients. We hope that medical facilities will refer to this technical report and use it as an aid to quality assurance in their own facilities.

PSOR12 Presentation Time: 12:25 PM: Technique and Preferences for Permanent LDR Prostate Brachytherapy Using Cesium-131

<h3>Purpose</h3> To identify individual technique preferences for Cesium-131 prostate implantation and determine if there is a uniform method among the brachytherapists. <h3>Methods</h3> Five experienced physicians, of the Cesium Advisory Group, using Cesium-131 monotherapy for permanent prostate brachytherapy were queried regarding their technique. A review of preferences examining variability and/or similarity for each brachytherapist was undertaken. <h3>Results</h3> Results below based on a prostate with a volume of 27cc. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Per experienced practitioners, Cesium-131 implants vary on several specifics in regards to technique. The brachytherapists are uniform in their practice to implant majority of the Cesium-131 isotope in the periphery.

PSOR10 Presentation Time: 12:15 PM: Permanent LDR Brachytherapy Using Cesium-131 Monotherapy: Updated Recommendations from the Cesium Advisory Group

<h3>Purpose</h3> Cesium-131 has a higher photon energy, as well as a shorter half-life in comparison to its counterparts Iodine-125 and Palladium-103. The optimal Cesium-131 implant will deliver a safe and effective dose with the least toxicity. Recommendations were formed based on examining data from hypothetical treatment plans performed by a group of experienced brachytherapists. <h3>Methods</h3> Six physicians with significant experience using Cesium-131 monotherapy for permanent prostate brachytherapy formed an advisory group. A review of implant techniques examining variability and/or similarity of different sized prostates for each brachytherapist was undertaken. The data acquired was compared to the past Cesium Advisory Group (2008) recommendations. <h3>Results</h3> Prescription dose for Cesium-131 was 100-115 Gy. Select data presented below.

Permanent LDR prostate brachytherapy: Comprehensive characterization of seed-dynamics within the prostate on a seed-only level

PURPOSESeed brachytherapy is a well-established treatment modality for prostate cancer. However, there is still a lack of profound characterizations of seed motions within the prostate. We assessed these dynamics between day 0 and day 30 of brachytherapy. METHODSWe considered 45 patients with 2408 implanted seeds, and performed a 1:1 assignment between their positions on post-plan CT (nominal day 30) and intraoperative ultrasound (day 0). Geometric seed arrangement changes were measured for each patient and the entire collective. The impact of seed strand-lengths and implant regions was investigated. Correlations with patient characteristics were evaluated. We determined corresponding dosimetric effects by calculating common dose metrics. RESULTSWe found a median seed displacement of 4.3 mm [interquartile range: 3.1–6.9 mm], occurring preferentially in superior-inferior direction. Single and double strands moved significantly stronger than strands of higher lengths. Seed dynamics was more pronounced in base (5.6 mm [3.7–10.7 mm]) and apex (6.5 mm [4.1–15.0 mm]) than in the mid-gland (3.8 mm [2.7–5.0 mm]), and less pronounced in peripheral (4.3 mm [3.0–6.7 mm]) than in urethra-near (5.5 mm [3.5–10.7 mm]) regions. Correlations of seed dynamics with prostate volume changes and the number of implanted seeds and needles were found. D90 (dose that 90% of the prostate receives) varied by a median of 3 Gy [-6 to 15 Gy] between treatment plan and post-plan, but >40 Gy for individual patients. CONCLUSIONSReducing seed dynamics is important to ensure a high treatment quality. For this, strands containing ≥3 seeds may be useful, implantations in base-, apex-, and urethra-near zone should be avoided, and the number of needles and seeds may be minimized where possible.

ACR-ABS-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Transperineal Permanent Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer.

The American College of Radiology (ACR), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly developed the following practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer is the interstitial implantation of low-dose rate radioactive seeds into the prostate gland for the purpose of treating localized prostate cancer. This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the Commission on Radiation Oncology, in collaboration with ABS and ASTRO. This practice parameter provides a framework for the appropriate use of low-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer either as monotherapy or as part of a treatment regimen combined with external-beam radiation therapy. The practice parameter defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all involved radiation oncology personnel, including the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, dosimetrist, radiation therapist, and nursing staff. Patient selection criteria and the utilization of supplemental therapies such as external-beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are discussed. The logistics of the implant procedure, postimplant dosimetry assessment, and best practices with regard to safety and quality control are presented. Adherence to established standards can help to ensure that permanent prostate brachytherapy is delivered in a safe and efficacious manner.

Correlations between intraplan and postplan parameters in I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy using loose seeds or linked seeds.

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate seed arrangement by comparing two different methods (linked seeds and loose seeds). A total of sixty-one patients (28 linked seed brachytherapy cases and 33 loose seed brachytherapy cases) with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy. Modified peripheral loading was the method used for seed placement. The parameters evaluated were as follows: prostate D90, V100, and V150; urethral D90, D10, and D5; and rectal V100 (RV100) and D2 (RD2). Coefficient parameters (r and r2) were assessed by regression analysis. Prostate V150, urethral D90, urethral D10, urethral D5, and RD2 showed significant correlations between both methods in all patients. Urethral D90, urethral D10, urethral D5, and RD2 showed significant correlations in patients who received linked seed brachytherapy. Prostate V150, urethral D90, urethral D10, urethral D5, RV100, and RD2 showed significant correlations in patients who received loose seed brachytherapy. Urethral D90, urethral D10, urethral D5, and RD2 showed significant correlations in the linked seed and loose seed brachytherapy analyses. In contrast, prostate D90 and prostate V100 showed no correlation. Parameters of normal organ damage showed good correlations between intraplan and postplan parameters. These parameters may be useful to determine normal organ damage during guided brachytherapy with two different methods (linked seeds and loose seeds).

Local seed displacement from Day 0 to Day 30 in I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy: A detailed, computed tomography-based analysis

PURPOSETo accurately quantify local seed displacement from Day 0 to Day 30 for our brachytherapy procedure. To quantify seed loss/migration and to identify the locations from where seeds are missing. METHODS AND MATERIALSSeed displacements were analyzed in 62 consecutive patients, who received brachytherapy with stranded I-125 seeds. At the start of the procedure, four fiducial gold markers were implanted. At the end of the implantation procedure an in-room 3D CBCT scan (Day 0) was acquired for accurate seed localization. At Day 30 a regular CT scan was acquired. This CT scan was rigidly registered to the CBCT scan using the fiducials. Subsequently, the Hungarian method was used to find pairs of corresponding seeds. Displacements were calculated and missing seeds were identified. RESULTSLocal seed displacements are smaller than 5 mm for 76.3% of the seeds; 2.3% show displacements larger than 10 mm. The largest seed displacements are seen along the inferior-superior axis: on average 1.0 ± 3.2 mm in superior direction with respect to the intraprostatic fiducials. Largest displacements are seen at the inferior-lateral sides of the prostate. On average, the inferior seeds move 1.0 ± 2.8 mm in anterior and 1.8 ± 3.3 mm in superior direction. The percentage of missing seeds is 0.2% (8 out of 3893 seeds for 5 patients). Most of the missing seeds were also originally implanted at the inferior-lateral sides of the prostate. CONCLUSIONSLocal seed displacements and number of missing seeds are small, and predominantly occur around the apex.

The Investigation of Tissue Composition Effects on Dose Distributions Using Monte Carlo Method in Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy

Objective: Radiation dose calculations in the prostate brachytherapy practices have very high importance in terms of the success of treatment. The purpose of the present study is to determine whether there is a significant dose difference between the radiation dose calculations performed in water medium and prostate cancer-diagnosed patients by using the Monte Carlo method.&#x0D; Methods: The radiation dose calculations were performed on 20 prostate patients by using the BrachyDose Monte Carlo code. Phantom geometry derived from real patients computed tomography (CT) data was created to use in dose calculations. Water material was assigned to all voxels within the prostate volume for dose comparison with CT derived phantom. 125I (Amersham, OncoSeed, 6711), 103Pd (Theragenics Co., TheraSeed, 200) and 131Cs (IsoRay Medical) commercial brachytherapy seed models were used in dose calculations. &#x0D; Results: It was observed that there are significant dose differences between the water medium and the prostate tissue. The differences between D90 dose values in prostate tissue and water medium were calculated as 7.2-10.5%, 9.1-13.4% and 5.4-8.3% for 125I, 103Pd and 131Cs brachytherapy seed sources, respectively. &#x0D; Conclusions: It was concluded that material compositions of different organs and tissues in the human body should be considered for more accurate brachytherapy dose calculations.

Salvage High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Definitive Radiation

PurposeSalvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (sHDRBT) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiation is associated with biochemical control in approximately half of patients at 3 to 5 years. Given potential toxicity, patient selection is critical. We present our institutional experience with sHDRBT and validate a recursive partitioning machines model for biochemical control. Materials and MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 129 patients who underwent whole-gland sHDRBT between 1998 and 2016. We evaluated clinical factors associated with biochemical control as well as toxicity. ResultsAt diagnosis the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 7.77 ng/mL. A majority of patients had T1-2 (73%) and Gleason 6-7 (82%) disease; 71% received external beam radiation therapy (RT) alone, and 22% received permanent prostate implants. The median disease-free interval (DFI) was 56 months, and median presalvage PSA was 4.95 ng/mL. At sHDRBT, 46% had T3 disease and 51% had Gleason 8 to 10 disease.At a median of 68 months after sHDRBT, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival were 85% (95% CI, 79-91) and 71% (95% CI, 62-79), respectively. Median PSA nadir was 0.18 ng/mL, achieved a median of 10 months after sHDRBT. Patients with ≥35%+ cores and a DFI <4.1 years had worse biochemical control (19% vs 50%, P = .02). Local failure (with or without regional/distant failure) was seen in 11% of patients (14/129), and 14 patients (11%) developed acute urinary obstruction requiring Foley placement and 19 patients (15%) developed strictures requiring dilation. ConclusionssHDRBT is a reasonable option for patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive RT. Those with <35%+ cores or an initial DFI of ≥4.1 years may be more likely to achieve long-term disease control after sHDRBT.

PO-0221 Doses to OAR during LDR permanent prostate treatment for monotherapy patient cohort

PO-0221 Doses to OAR during LDR permanent prostate treatment for monotherapy patient cohort

Prostate permanent implant brachytherapy with BARC I-125 Ocu-Prosta seeds.

The aim of this study is implementation and establishment of standard operating procedure for permanent prostate implant brachytherapy technique using BARC I-125 Ocu-Prosta seeds. The transrectal ultrasound (US)-guided procedure was used for permanent implant procedure. The Best® Sonalis™ US Imaging System and Best NOMOS™ Treatment Planning system was used for volume study and implant procedure. The BARC provided I-125 Ocu-Pro radioactive seeds were implanted into the patient with help of Mick@ Applicator. The implant was performed based on pre-implant dosimetry and intraoperative planning performed during implant procedure. The necessary quality assurance tests were performed for US system before clinical use. The boost dose of 110 Gy was prescribed to the prostate volume of 34.71 cc. About 48 seeds with activity of 0.35 mCi (each) implanted into the prostate volume with reference to intraoperative planning. At the end of procedure, the patient underwent abdomen fluoroscopic examination, to ensure the seed counts in the prostate volume. The day after the implant, the patient was discharged. One month later a planning computed tomography and treatment planning was performed for seed position and dose verification. Low dose rate permanent implant brachytherapy has the advantage of being a one-time procedure and the existing long term follow-up supports its excellent outcome and low morbidity. BARC-BRIT is supplying the loose 125I seeds. These seeds can be easily implanted into the patient using Mick applicator. However, the pre-implant seed preparation and implant procedure may result some radiation exposure to staff involved. The radiation dose can be minimized with good practice. This report is one patient pilot study and intended to test the implant systems and standard operative procedure henceforth for permanent implant brachytherapy procedure.

Analysis of radioactive implant migration in patients treated with iodine-125 seeds for permanent prostate brachytherapy with MRI-classified median lobe hyperplasia.

PurposeProstate cancer with median lobe hyperplasia (MLH) is a relative contraindication for permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) because of an increased risk of post-implant dysuria and technical difficulties associated with achieving stability while implanting within the intravesical tissue. We examined treatment outcome, seed migration, and urination disorders after treatment in MLH patients in order to determine to what degree MLH implants could be stabilized.Material and methodsBetween March 2007 and December 2016, 32 patients had MLH identified radiologically on magnetic resonance imaging, and 193 patients did not have MLH (non-MLH). All patients were treated with loose seeds. In this study, seed migration was defined as a seed distant from the target (≥ 1.5 cm) and/or with no dosimetric contribution to the target. The MLH patients were divided into 2 MLH groups of mild (< 10 mm) and severe (≥ 10 mm) MLH by measuring the distance between the posterior transitional zone and the prostatic tissue protruding into the bladder. We retrospectively analyzed seed migration, dose-volume histograms (DVH), and genitourinary toxicity.ResultsMLH was classified as mild in 24 patients and severe in 8. Seed migration occurred in 61 (31.6%) of 193 non-MLH patients and 10 (31.5%) of 32 MLH patients. Implant seed migration and low-dose level of median lobe tended to be high in severe MLH cases. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) peaked one month after implantation, but then resolved slowly and returned to around the pre-treatment level after one year. There were no severe complications.ConclusionsMLH does not appear to be a strong contraindication for low-dose-rate brachytherapy. However, we found that the seed migration and degree of cold spots tended to be higher in severe MLH cases than in others; therefore, close attention when treating severe MLH cases must be paid.