Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) provides prognostic and symptomatic benefits for patients with heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. It requires the implantation of an LV lead, usually placed in a tributary of the coronary sinus. Despite important progress made in the development of dedicated instrumentation, challenges still remain, and the procedure may even be unsuccessful for various reasons, including CS occlusion, dissection, abnormal ostium of the CS, coronary vein stenosis, lead instability, high threshold, or phrenic nerve stimulation. Even if the procedure is successful, about 30% of patients receiving CRT do not respond to treatment [1]. Although the underlying reasons for the lack of CRT response in some patients are undoubtedly multifactorial, some problems have been identified and may have the potential to be ameliorated. Firstly, limitations imposed by coronary venous anatomy on the selection of the site for LV stimulation are thought to be a major contributor to the lack of CRT response. Secondly, stimulation is epicardial, which leads to delayed electrical activation of the LV in comparison to endocardial stimulation, and has been shown to provide less hemodynamic benefit [2]. Additionally, pacing leads are the most frequent cause of complications related to permanent pacing systems and CRT complication rates for coronary vein leads are ~11–12% [3]. An alternative approach of delivering left ventricular endocardial leadless pacing (LVELP) offers a number of potential advantages, including greater choice of LV lead position, possibly more rapid LV activation, and reducing lead-related complications. The feasibility of a new technology using energy transfer from an ultrasound transmitter to a receiver electrode to achieve cardiac stimulationwithout theuseof apacing leadhas been reportedpreviously [4]. A novel implantable cardiac pacing systembased on this concept has recently been developed for the treatment of heart failure (Wireless Cardiac Stimulation-LVSystem,WiCS®-LV, EBRSystems, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and a clinical trial using the WiCS®-LV system is ongoing in Europe. The study titled Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) is evaluating the safety and feasibility in specific subsets of patients with CRT-eligible heart failure. LVLEPwill maybe become an effective approach for LV pacing in CRT. In this letter we discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of this method. LVLEP provides several potential advantages, including: