Permanent Night Shift Workers Research Articles

Shift work and evening chronotype are associated with hepatic fat fraction and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in 282,303 UK biobank participants.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has rapidly become the most common liver disease worldwide. Modern lifestyles have been linked to this rise in prevalence with changes in rhythmic human behaviour emerging as a possible mechanism. We investigated how shift working patterns and chronotype were associated with hepatic fat fraction and NAFLD in 282,303 UK Biobank participants. We stratified participants into day, irregular-shift, and permanent night-shift workers. We then utilised multiple methods of disease identification including (i) Dallas steatosis index (DSI), (ii) ICD10 codes, and (iii) hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and examined how shift work exposure impacted these variables. We further assessed the relationship of baseline chronotype with liver phenotypes using these same outcome measures. Compared to day workers, irregular-shift workers were more likely to have a high DSI (OR 1.29 (1.2-1.4)) after adjusting for major covariates with some attenuation after additional adjustment for BMI (OR 1.12 (1.03-1.22)). Likelihood of high DSI was also increased in permanent night-shift workers (OR 1.08 (0.9-1.29)) in the fully adjusted model. Mediator analysis revealed that BMI was a significant mediator of the shift work effect. Compared to participants with intermediate chronotype, those with extreme late chronotype had a higher likelihood of high DSI defined NAFLD (OR 1.45 (1.34-1.56)) and a higher likelihood of NAFLD/NASH by ICD10 code (OR 1.23 (1.09-1.39)). Hepatic PDFF was elevated in irregular shift workers, but not permanent night-shift workers. Irregular-shift work and extreme late chronotype are associated with pathological liver fat accumulation, suggesting circadian misalignment may have an underlying pathogenic role. These findings have implications for health interventions to mitigate the detrimental effect of shift work.

Poor sleep and shift work associate with increased blood pressure and inflammation in UK Biobank participants

Disrupted circadian rhythms have been linked to an increased risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. However, many studies show inconsistent findings and are not sufficiently powered for targeted subgroup analyses. Using the UK Biobank cohort, we evaluate the association between circadian rhythm-disrupting behaviours, blood pressure (SBP, DBP) and inflammatory markers in >350,000 adults with European white British ancestry. The independent U-shaped relationship between sleep length and SBP/DBP is most prominent with a low inflammatory status. Poor sleep quality and permanent night shift work are also positively associated with SBP/DBP. Although fully adjusting for BMI in the linear regression model attenuated effect sizes, these associations remain significant. Two-sample Mendelian Randomisation (MR) analyses support a potential causal effect of long sleep, short sleep, chronotype, daytime napping and sleep duration on SBP/DBP. Thus, in the current study, we present a positive association between circadian rhythm-disrupting behaviours and SBP/DBP regulation in males and females that is largely independent of age.

0246 Current shift work and frailty: findings from the UK Biobank

Abstract Introduction Shift work may disrupt sleep and circadian rhythms, leading to adverse health outcomes. The objective of this study is to examine whether performing shift work is associated with frailty in middle- to older-aged adults. Methods We examined current shift work exposure and frailty risk in 242,126 UK Biobank participants (38-71 years old; 128,595 females). Using the baseline self-reported employment information, participants were categorized as shift workers (with ‘work schedule that falls outside of the normal daytime working hours of 9am-5pm’) or day workers if no shift work schedule. Based on a previously validated approach, frailty phenotype was identified when three or more of the following five criteria were fulfilled: self-reported weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slow walking pace, and measured low grip strength. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association between shift work and frailty. Results Among 242,126 participants, 201,489 (83.2%) were day workers and 40,637 (16.8%) shift workers. Frailty was identified in 4,308 participants (1.8%), including 3,312 day workers (1.6%) and 996 shift workers (2.5%). Compared with day workers, shift workers were at higher risk for frailty after adjusting age, sex, and ethnicity, i.e., odds ratio (OR) =1.58 [95% CI, 1.47-1.70] (p < 0.0001). The effect of shift work appeared to be more pronounced in 5,659 permanent night shift workers (OR = 1.98 [95% CI, 1.68-2.32], p < 0.0001). The differences between day workers and shift workers persisted even after further adjusting for social economic status, sleep duration, and chronotype (OR = 1.38 [95% CI, 1.28-1.48] for all shift workers; OR = 1.53 [95% CI, 1.30-1.80] for permanent night shift workers, both p values < 0.0001). Conclusion Middle- to older-aged adults who were currently performing shift work, especially those permanent night shift workers, were more likely to be frail. Longitudinal and interventional studies are warranted to elucidate the causal relationship between shift work and the risk of frailty. Support (if any) BrightFocus Foundation (A2020886S), NIH (RF1AG059867, RF1AG064312)

ODP146 Exploring Systemic Inflammation in the Relationships Between Poor Sleep Health or Shift-Work and Blood Pressure Across BMI, Sex and Age Groups

Abstract Circadian challenges such as social and travel jetlag, poor sleep health or undertaking shift-work is becoming increasingly linked to incidences of cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome and hypertension due to the impact of circadian disruption. Currently, studies that address how such challenges can become specific risk factors for the development of hypertension show inconsistent findings and the underlying pathophysiology is not well understood. Using a cross-sectional study approach, we investigate the associations between markers of circadian strain, including sleep length, sleep quality and shift-work, and blood pressure. Furthermore, we explore whether systemic inflammation could be a potential driving mechanism in these associations. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) measurements collected from European White participants recruited under the UK Biobank cohort were compared between those who reported a short (≤5 hours and 6), normal (7 hours) or long (8 and ≥ 9 hours) sleep duration or a healthy (4-5), moderate (2-3) or poor (0-1) sleep quality score. Using logistic regression models, we tested the effect of adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and then further stratifying by key covariates, including BMI, sex and age. Similarly, these analyses were repeated to compare SBP and DBP between individuals who undertake different types of shift-work (day, mixed, night, permanent-night or no shift-work) at the time of recruitment. Participants who reported 7 hours of sleep or a healthy sleep quality score had the lowest mean blood pressure, ∼139/83 mmHg. A U-shape relationship was observed when plotting the beta-estimates (β) of the associations between each sleep length group and SBP or DBP. However, this U-shape is blunted following further adjusting for BMI and respective stratification revealed this relationship is driven by female participants with a BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 . Moderate and poor sleep quality scores were positively associated with only DBP when BMI is adjusted for and across all BMI groups (≤25, 25-<30 and ≥30 kg/m 2, p<0. 05 is all instances) compared to healthy sleep quality scores. Shift-work was reported in 15.3% of this sample and of which, more males reported undertaking day-shift, mixed-shift, night-shift or permanent night-shift work than female participants. Mean SBP and DBP reported in all these shift-work types were higher than in non-shift workers. Exploratory data also suggests that some associations may be partly driven by inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and immune cell count. Taken together our data suggest that both inadequate or compromised sleep health or undertaking shift-work are associated with heightened blood pressure, which could be potentially driven by an inflammatory component. Establishing the adverse consequences of these circadian challenges on blood pressure can help understand how re-aligning our behaviour reduces blood pressure and thus, minimises the risk of developing hypertension. Presentation: No date and time listed

Effects of One Night of Forced Wakefulness on Morning Resting Blood Pressure in Humans: The Role of Biological Sex and Weight Status.

Permanent night shift work is associated with adverse health effects, including elevated blood pressure (BP) and hypertension. Here, we examined the BP response to one night of forced wakefulness in a sitting position in a cohort without night shift work experience. According to a counterbalanced crossover design, 47 young adults with either obesity (N = 22; 10 women) or normal weight (N = 25; 11 women) participated in one night of sleep and one night of forced wakefulness under in-laboratory conditions. Resting ankle and brachial arterial BP were assessed in the morning, i.e., the time of the day when adverse cardiovascular events peak. After forced wakefulness, diastolic and mean arterial BP were ~4 mmHg higher at the ankle site and ~3 mmHg higher at the brachial site than after regular sleep (p < 0.05). The increase in BP following overnight forced wakefulness was more pronounced among men vs. women and more significant for diastolic BP at both sites among participants with normal weight vs. those with obesity. If confirmed in larger cohorts, including 24 h BP monitoring, people with occupations involving night shifts might benefit from regular BP monitoring. Particular attention should be paid to possible sex- and weight-specific effects of night shift work on BP.

Night Shift Work, Genetic Risk, and Hypertension

ObjectiveTo perform a prospective cohort study to investigate whether night shift work is associated with incident hypertension and whether this association is modified by genetic susceptibility to hypertension because evidence on the association between night shift work and hypertension is insufficient. MethodsA total of 232,665 participants of UK Biobank who were recruited from 2006 to 2010 and observed to January 31, 2018, were included in this study. A Cox proportional hazards model with covariate adjustment was performed to assess the association between night shift work exposure and hypertension risk. We constructed a polygenic risk score (PRS) for genetic susceptibility to hypertension, which was used to explore whether genetic susceptibility to hypertension modified the effect of night shift work. The robustness of the results was assessed by sensitivity analysis. ResultsNight shift workers had a higher hypertension risk than day shift workers, which increased with increasing frequency of night shift work (Ptrend<.001). The association was attenuated but still remained statistically significant in the fully adjusted model. We explored the joint effect of night shift work and genetic susceptibility on hypertension. Permanent night shift workers with higher hypertension PRSs had higher risk of hypertension than day workers with low PRSs. ConclusionNight shift work exposure was associated with increased hypertension risk, which was modified by the genetic risk for hypertension, indicating that there is a joint effect of night shift work and genetic risk on hypertension.

Shift Work, Genetic Factors, and the Risk of Heart Failure: A Prospective Study of the UK Biobank

ObjectiveTo quantify the association of combined shift work and genetic factors with the incidence of heart failure (HF). Participants and MethodsThis study included 242,754 participants with complete shift work information in the UK Biobank. Participants were followed from baseline (2006 to 2010) through January 31, 2018. The association between shift work and HF incidence was investigated separately in males and females using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for covariates. In addition, we established a polygenic risk score and assessed whether shift work alters genetic susceptibility to HF. ResultsThe results showed a significant association of permanent night shift work with incident HF among females (hazard ratio, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.76; P=.002) after adjusting for age, and the association was attenuated in the fully adjusted model. Among men, we did not detect an association between shift work and HF. In addition, we observed that the association between the risk of HF and shift work was strengthened by high genetic risk. Permanent night shift work paired with high genetic risk, compared with low genetic risk, was suggested to be associated with the risk of HF in females (hazard ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.05 to 7.94) but not in males. ConclusionShift work, particularly permanent night shift work, may increase the risk of HF in females, especially in those with high genetic risk.

Impact of night and shift work on metabolic syndrome and its components: a cross-sectional study in an active middle-to-older-aged population-based sample

ObjectivesTo examine the effects of work schedules on metabolic syndrome and its components in active middle-to-older-aged workers.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis including middle-to-older-aged active workers from the population-based CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study (Lausanne, Switzerland)...

Social jetlag and sleep debts are altered in different rosters of night shift work

Night and shift work are suspected to cause various adverse effects on health and sleep. Sleep deprivation through shift work is assumed to be compensated on free days. So far it is not clear how different shift systems and shift lengths affect sleep structure on work and free days. Especially working night shifts disrupts the circadian rhythm but also extended working hours (12h) might affect sleep characteristics. Hitherto, the magnitude of sleep debt, social jetlag, and Locomotor Inactivity During Sleep (LIDS) in different shift systems is unknown. Here, we investigated the impact of five different shift rosters on sleep in 129 industrial workers from Germany. Permanent night work with multiple shift systems with and without night shifts and with different shift lengths were compared. Wrist-activity was monitored over 28 days revealing sleep on- and offsets as well as LIDS as proxy for sleep quality. Overall, 3,865 sleep bouts comprising 22,310 hours of sleep were examined. The mean daily age-adjusted sleep duration (including naps) was 6:43h and did not differ between shift workers of different rosters. However, sleep duration on workdays was particularly low in rotational shift systems with 12h-shifts (5:00h), while overall sleep debt was highest. Shift workers showed a median absolute social jetlag of 3:03h, which differed considerably between shift types and rosters (p<0.0001). Permanent night workers had the highest social jetlag (5:08h) and latest mid-sleeps on workdays and free days. Sleep quality was reduced in permanent night shift workers compared with shift workers in other rosters and differed between daytime and nighttime sleep. Shift work leads to partial sleep deprivation, which particularly affects workers in 12h-shifts and permanent night shifts. Working these shifts resulted in higher sleep debts and larger absolute social jetlag whereas sleep quality was especially reduced in permanent night shift workers compared with shift workers of other rosters.

Is shift-work associated with increased risk of rectal cancer? A meta-analysis.

e15600 Background: Globally, more than 1.8 million people were diagnosed of colorectal cancer (CRC) in 2018, with over 30% of CRC in the rectum. Shift-work, involving circadian disruption, sleep deprivation and lifestyle changes, was designated as a probable cause of cancer by The International Agency for Research on Cancer. Previous studies investigating the impact of permanent night-shift work and rotating shift-work on rectal cancer risk showed controversial results. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted. Methods: A comprehensive literature search on PubMed was conducted to identify all relevant studies published prior to January 2021 according to the established inclusion criteria. The quality assessment was performed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the association between the shift-work and rectal cancer risk. Based on heterogeneity significance, random-effect or fixed-effect model was used. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the night-shift and rotating-shift, respectively. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were performed, and trim and fill analysis was also conducted. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software (version 5.3; Cochrane library) and STATA 15.0 statistical software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX), and all P values were two-tailed, the test level was 0.05. Results: Thirty-seven articles were obtained from database searching. Three articles involving 1,063 rectal cancer cases were included. All studies were considered moderate to high quality. All included studies investigated on the association between shift-work and rectal cancer risk. A statistically significant association between shift-work and increased rectal cancer risk was found (OR 1.53, 95%CI: 1.31, 1.79, P&lt; 0.00001, I 2 = 35%). In subgroup analyses, night-shift work was associated with a non-statistically significant increased risk of rectal cancer (OR 1.25, 95%CI: 0.47, 3.32, P = 0.66, I 2 = 93%). In contrast, Rotating-shift was associated with a statistically significant increased rectal cancer risk (OR 1.35, 95%CI: 1.10, 1.65, P = 0.004, I 2 = 6%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the result. Funnel plot, Egger's test (t = 1.69, P = 0.341), and Begg's test (z = 1.04, P = 0.296) found no publication bias of analysis. Trim and fill analysis on fixed-effect model showed the pooled OR kept stable after adding two “missing” studies (OR 1.403, 95%CI: 1.224, 1.609, P &lt;0.05). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis demonstrates that shift-work is associated with increased rectal cancer risk. However, no association between night-shift work and rectal cancer risk was found. In contrast, association between rotating-shift work and increased rectal cancer risk was found. More original studies on this topic are needed to further explore shift-work impacts on rectal cancer risk.

Shift work is associated with positive COVID-19 status in hospitalised patients

IntroductionShift work is associated with lung disease and infections. We therefore investigated the impact of shift work on significant COVID-19 illness.Methods501 000 UK Biobank participants were linked to secondary care...

Shift work, and particularly permanent night shifts, promote dyslipidaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsShift work is common worldwide and linked to deleterious cardiovascular effects that might be underlined by dyslipidemia. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the impact of shiftwork on dyslipidemia. MethodsSearching in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Embase databases without language restriction on 15 February 2020, included studies that describe blood lipids levels or a risk measure in shift workers compared with fixed-day workers (controls). Differences by study-level characteristics were estimated using stratified meta-analysis by type of shift work, and meta-regression to examine relations between dyslipidemia and demographic, lifestyle and work characteristics. Estimates were pooled using random-effect meta-analysis. ResultsWe included a total of 66 articles, representing 197,063 workers. Shift work globally increased the levels of triglycerides (overall SMD = 0.09; 95CI 0.05 to 0.13; p < 0.001), and globally decreased the levels of c-HDL (−0.08; 95CI −0.12 to −0.03; p = 0.001). Permanent night shift workers were an at-risk type of shift for dyslipidemia with significantly higher blood levels of total cholesterol (0.22; 95CI 0.01 to 0.42; p = 0.043) and triglycerides (0.18; 0.03 to 0.33; p = 0.017), and significantly lower blood levels of c-HDL (−0.16; 95CI −0.32 to 0.00; p = 0.05). Permanent night shift workers were more at-risk for total cholesterol than rotating 3 × 8 shift workers (Coefficient 0.22; 95CI 0.01 to 0.42; p = 0.038) and rotating 2 × 12 shift workers (0.24; 0.02 to 0.46; p = 0.037), and more at-risk for triglycerides than rotating day shift workers (0.21; 95CI 0.03 to 0.38; p = 0.023). Results were non-significant for c-LDL, nor depending on type of shifts. ConclusionsShift work, and particularly permanent night shift, is associated with dyslipidaemia via elevated total cholesterol and triglycerides, and reduced HDL-cholesterol. Our current study provides a practical and valuable strengthening of the evidence-base required for preventive health initiatives and workplace reform.

Relationship between shift work and the onset of rheumatoid arthritis

BackgroundEnvironmental factors play a prominent role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aetiology. Shift work has previously been associated with increased RA risk in females. The aim of this study was to...

The association between anxiety, hunger, the enjoyment of eating foods and the satiety after food intake in individuals working a night shift compared with after taking a nocturnal sleep: A prospective and observational study

Subjective responses to meals are altered by shortened sleep time and anxiety state, but this effect has been poorly studied in shift workers – who act as a typical model concerning sleep restriction and present high levels of anxiety. The objective of this study was to compare subjective perceptions of meals and the levels of anxiety in the same subjects after working night shifts and after taking a nocturnal sleep, and to investigate associations between the responses to meals and the levels of anxiety under these two conditions. The study evaluated 34 male permanent night-shift workers who worked a 12-h shift followed by a 36-h rest period. Evaluations included: sleep pattern (on three days after working night shifts and after sleeping at night); hunger, enjoyment of eating foods and satiety after a meal (evaluated by visual analogue scales on three non-consecutive days after working night shifts and after nocturnal sleeps); and state of anxiety (on a day after working a night shift and a day after a nocturnal sleep). In the days following a night shift, workers had higher mean hunger scores before lunch and higher anxiety scores than when they had slept at night (p = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively). Linear regression indicated that, after a night shift, anxiety scores were negatively associated with hunger before breakfast (p = 0.04) and lunch (p = 0.03), the enjoyment of eating foods (p = 0.03) and the number of meals eaten during the course of the 24 h (p = 0.03). It is concluded that night shifts increase mean hunger and anxiety scores. Anxiety levels seem to interfere with the responses associated with food consumption.

Length polymorphism in the Period 3 gene is associated with sleepiness and maladaptive circadian phase in night-shift workers.

The objective of the current study was to determine if night-shift workers carrying the five-repeat variant of the Period 3 gene show elevated levels of nocturnal sleepiness and earlier circadian phase compared with homozygotes for the four-repeat allele. Twenty-four permanent night-shift workers were randomly selected from a larger study. Participants took part in an observational laboratory protocol including an overnight multiple sleep latency test and half-hourly saliva collection for calculation of dim-light melatonin onset. Period 3(-/5) shift workers had significantly lower multiple sleep latency test during overnight work hours compared with Period 3(4/4) workers (3.52 ± 23.44 min versus 10.39 ± 6.41 min, P = 0.003). We observed no significant difference in sleepiness during early morning hours following acute sleep deprivation. Long-allele carriers indicated significantly higher sleepiness on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale administered at 17:00 hours (12.08 ± 2.55 versus 8.00 ± 1.94, P < 0.001). We observed a significantly earlier melatonin onset in Period 3(-/5) individuals compared with Period 3(4/4) shift workers (20:44 ± 6:37 versus 02:46 ± 4:58, P = 0.021). Regression analysis suggests that Period 3 genotype independently predicts sleepiness even after controlling for variations in circadian phase, but we were unable to link Period 3 to circadian phase when controlling for sleepiness. Period 3(-/5) shift workers showed both subjective and objective sleepiness in the pathological range, while their Period 3(4/4) counterparts showed sleepiness within normal limits. Period 3(-/5) night workers also show a mean circadian phase 6 h earlier (i.e. less adapted) than Period 3(4/4) workers. Because Period 3(-/5) workers have maladaptive circadian phase as well as pathological levels of sleepiness, they may be at greater risk for occupational and automotive accidents. We interpret these findings as a call for future research on the role of Period 3 in sleepiness and circadian phase, especially as they relate to night work.

The impact of shift work and organizational work climate on health outcomes in nurses.

Shift workers have a higher rate of negative health outcomes than day shift workers. Few studies however, have examined the role of difference in workplace environment between shifts itself on such health measures. This study investigated variation in organizational climate across different types of shift work and health outcomes in nurses. Participants (n = 142) were nursing staff from a metropolitan Melbourne hospital. Demographic items elicited the type of shift worked, while the Work Environment Scale and the General Health Questionnaire measured organizational climate and health respectively. Analysis supported the hypotheses that different organizational climates occurred across different shifts, and that different organizational climate factors predicted poor health outcomes. Shift work alone was not found to predict health outcomes. Specifically, permanent night shift workers had significantly lower coworker cohesion scores compared with rotating day and evening shift workers and significantly higher managerial control scores compared with day shift workers. Further, coworker cohesion and involvement were found to be significant predictors of somatic problems. These findings suggest that differences in organizational climate between shifts accounts for the variation in health outcomes associated with shift work. Therefore, increased workplace cohesion and involvement, and decreased work pressure, may mitigate the negative health outcomes of shift workers.

Health-related interventions among night shift workers: a critical review of the literature

Associations between shift work and chronic disease have been observed, but relatively little is known about how to mitigate these adverse health effects. This critical review aimed to (i) synthesize interventions that have been implemented among shift workers to reduce the chronic health effects of shift work and (ii) provide an overall evaluation of study quality. MeSH terms and keywords were created and used to conduct a rigorous search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE for studies published on or before 13 August 2012. Study quality was assessed using a checklist adapted from Downs & Black. Of the 5053 articles retrieved, 44 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Over 2354 male and female rotating and permanent night shift workers were included, mostly from the manufacturing, healthcare, and public safety industries. Studies were grouped into four intervention types: (i) shift schedule; (ii) controlled light exposure; (iii) behavioral; and, (iv) pharmacological. Results generally support the benefits of fast-forward rotating shifts; simultaneous use of timed bright light and light-blocking glasses; and physical activity, healthy diet, and health promotion. Mixed results were observed for hypnotics. Study quality varied and numerous deficiencies were identified. Except for hypnotics, several types of interventions reviewed had positive overall effects on chronic disease outcomes. There was substantial heterogeneity among studies with respect to study sample, interventions, and outcomes. There is a need for further high-quality, workplace-based prevention research conducted among shift workers.

Sleep Loss, Circadian Mismatch, and Abnormalities in Reorienting of Attention in Night Workers with Shift Work Disorder

Permanent night-shift workers may develop shift-work disorder (SWD). In the current study, we evaluated neurophysiological and behavioral indices of distractibility across times prior to the night shift (T1), during night hours (T2), and after acute sleep deprivation (T3) in permanent hospital night workers with and without SWD. Ten asymptomatic night workers (NW) and 18 NW with SWD participated in a 25-h sleep deprivation study. Circadian phase was evaluated by dim-light salivary melatonin onset (DLMO). Objective sleepiness was evaluated using the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT). Electrophysiological distractibility was evaluated by brain event-related potentials (ERP), whereas behavioral distractibility was evaluated by performance on a visual task in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm. Comparisons of ERP results were performed by repeated-measures analysis of variance, and t-tests were used where appropriate. A Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of variables (MLST, Stanford Sleepiness Scale, and DLMO) that deviated from normal. First, in the SWD group, the reorienting negativity ERP amplitude was significantly attenuated compared to that in the NW group. Second, the SWD group had shorter MSLT during night shift hours (4.8 ± 4.9 min) compared to that in NW (7.8 ± 3.7 min; U = 47; z = -2.1; P < 0.03). Third, NW with SWD had a DLMO at 20:27 ± 5.0 h, whereas healthy NW had a DLMO at 05:00 ± 3.4 h (U = 43.5; z = -2.22, P < 0.03). Finally, acute sleep deprivation impaired behavioral performance and the P3a ERP in both groups. Our results demonstrate specific deficits in neurophysiological activity in the attentional domain among the shift-work disorder group relative to night workers.

Spontaneous Abortions and Shift Work in a Cohort of Nurses in Norway

Background: An association between spontaneous abortions and shift work has been suggested, but present research results are conflicting. The aim of the study is to evaluate the relationship between spontaneous abortions among nurses, shift schedules, and nights worked. Methods: This is a longitudinal study where we identified 914 females from a cohort of nurses in Norway who had worked the same type of shift schedule 2008-2010; either permanent day shift, three-shift rotation or permanent night shift. Information on age, work and life-style factors, as well as spontaneous abortions during lifetime and the past three years (2008-2010) was obtained by annual questionnaires. Results: A higher prevalence of experienced spontaneous abortions before study start (2008) was found among nurses working permanent night shift compared to other nurses. In a linear regression analysis, a risk of 1.3 was found for experienced spontaneous abortions before study start among permanent night shift nurses, with day shift as reference, when adjusting for age, smoking, caffeine and job strain, but the finding was not statistical significant (95 per cent confidence interval 0.8-2.1). Permanent night shift workers had a risk of 1.5 experiencing spontaneous abortions in 2008-2010 compared to day shift nurses, although not statistical significant (95 per cent confidence interval 0.7-3.5). The number of night shifts the past three years was not associated with experiencing spontaneous abortions 2008-2010, but associated with a reduced risk of experiencing spontaneous abortions during lifetime. The results must be interpreted in the light of a possible selection bias; both selections into the occupation of nursing and into the different shift types of the more healthy persons may have occurred in this population. Conclusion: No significant increased risk of spontaneous abortion among permanent night shift nurses compared to day-time nurses was found in this study, and no association was found between spontaneous abortions and the number of worked night shifts.

Working the night shift: a necessary time for training or a risk to health and safety?

The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) limits excessive night shifts and restricts the working week to no more than 48 hours. The underlying rationale is to minimise the health risks to all workers. Here we debate the impact of night rotas for doctors-in-training on patient safety and medical education; when the EWTD was agreed these topics may not have been considered, either systematically or objectively. The impacts of diurnal rhythms on human functions affect all night workers, but the nature of rostered medical and surgical work has little precedent in other industries or even in the contracts of other healthcare staff. For example, rostered night duties need to be distinguished from permanent night shift work. On-call medical night work from training doctors is generally required for short periods and usually involves fewer patients. It is an important time in training, where clinical responsibility and decision-making can be matured in a supervised setting. To comply with the EWTD most hospitals have adopted rota patterns that aim to cover the clinical needs, while ensuring no doctor works for more than 48 hours in an average working week. To monitor this process longterm studies are necessary to evaluate effects on a doctor's health and on patient care generally. The EWTD has also led to a loss of continuity of patient care; does this really matter?