Periviable Infants Research Articles

Trends in the Mortality and Death of Periviable Preterm Infants in the United States, 2011 to 2020.

This study aimed to examine the trends in the infant mortality rate (IMR) and the trends in the timing of death among periviable preterm infants at 22 to 24 weeks' gestational age (GA) in the United States from 2011 to 2020. Retrospective, serial cross-sectional analysis of periviable preterm infants born in the United States at 22 to 24 weeks' GA using the linked birth/infant death records from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data were analyzed from 2011 to 2020. The exposure was the year of death, and the outcome was the changes over time in the IMR and the timing of death. Further, we evaluated racial differences in the timing of death. We used nonparametric trend analysis to evaluate changes in mortality rate across the study period. The IMR was inversely related to GA, and for each GA and race/ethnicity, the IMR significantly declined during the study period. The IMR rate was highest in the first 7 days of life for all GAs and races/ethnicities. While Non-Hispanic White infants had a higher infant neonatal mortality rate than non-Hispanic Black infants, non-Hispanic Black infants had a higher postneonatal mortality rate. The IMR among periviable infants born at 22 to 24 weeks' GA improved for all GAs and races in the United States between 2011 and 2020. However, significant racial differences in the timing of death exist. · As expected, the IMR was inversely related to gestational age at 22 to 24 weeks.. · At each gestational age and for each racial/ethnic group, the overall IMR decreased during the study period.. · Non-Hispanic White infants had a higher neonatal mortality rate, whereas non-Hispanic Black infants had a higher postneonatal mortality rate..

Balancing survival and suffering: factors influencing parental decision making after periviable consultation.

The objective of this study was to identify factors birthing parents consider related to potential resuscitation of a periviable infant. Birthing parents who received a prenatal consult from a newborn intensive care unit provider between 22.0 and 24.6 weeks gestational age were eligible to participate in a semi-structured interview focused on their periviable decision making. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Qualitative analysis shows that birthing parents attribute their decision to a balance between vitality and suffering, with the balance point influenced by various elements. While parents described the choice they made, none reported that the information they received during the prenatal consult had a significant impact. This study highlights the minimal impact that information given during a periviable consult has on parental decision making. Information from this study can be used to develop an improved model of perinatal consultation.

Positioning comfort measures in antenatal counselling for periviable infants.

Caring for the extremely premature infant born in the grey zone of viability is the most difficult area of neonatal medicine. Little research has been done on antenatal communication between neonatologists and parents anticipating the birth of a periviable infant. This article analyses 25 antenatal consultations between neonatologists and parents in one Midwestern hospital in the United States of America. It explores how neonatologists position comfort care as one of two predominant care trajectories for extremely premature infants born into the grey zone of viability. We found comfort care featured minimally in and was often marginalised by neonatologists' language. The two dominant discourses contributing to this were acute medicine's life-saving capacity and a limited temporal window marked by gestational age where comfort measures were deemed appropriate. Antenatal consultations framed by shared decision-making could be approached as a form of care characterised by a relational openness and responsiveness to parents' views on care. This asks neonatologists to enter antenatal consultations for periviability without knowing ahead of time which care trajectory will necessarily call one's attention or the particular response one should take, thus highlighting the skills of reflexivity in addition to an attentiveness and openness towards those receiving care.

Neurological outcomes and associated perinatal factors in infants born between 22 and 25 weeks with active care.

To elucidate the outcomes of periviable infants receiving active care (AC) and explore perinatal factors associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes. This is a single-center retrospective study on infants born at 22-25 weeks of gestation, all of whom received AC. A developmental quotient (DQ) ≥ 85 at corrected 18 months was judged as normal. Fifty-seven infants were included in the study. The survival rates at discharge were 83%, 86%, 93%, and 93% at 22, 23, 24, and 25 gestational weeks, respectively. The overall percentage of normal DQ was 26/47 (55%). Acidemia in the arterial blood gas measured within 6 h after birth was identified as a factor significantly associated with subnormal DQ. Not only high survival rates, but also favorable neurodevelopmental outcomes may be achieved by AC in periviable infants. Moreover, impaired neurodevelopmental outcomes may be associated with early postnatal acidemia following initial resuscitation.

A stylet use may be beneficial for elective and rescue intubation of prematurely born infants < 30 weeks.

Recent studies have reported that using a stylet does not provide any advantages during intubation within a diverse infant population. Our research focuses on the issue, specifically in premature infants who undergo elective or rescue intubation (EI or RI) in the delivery room (DR). We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study comparing the number of intubation attempts, the duration of intubation procedure until successful, and the rate of associated desaturations exceeding 20%. We derived outcomes from video recordings and performed statistical analyses. We have analyzed 104 intubation attempts in 70 infants with a mean gestational age and birth weight of 25±1.9 weeks and 736±221 grams, respectively; 39 of these attempts involved stylet use, and 65 did not. 75% of infants requiring intubation were less than 26 weeks of gestational age. The use of a stylet increased the rate of successful initial attempts [OR (95% CI) 4.3 (1.3-14.8), P=0.019], reduced the duration of the intubation procedure [median (IQR) seconds: 43 (30-72) vs 140 (62-296), P<0.001], and decreased the occurrences of desaturation exceeding 20% (13% vs 50%, P=0.003). The benefits of using a stylet during rescue and elective intubations of premature infants in the delivery room outweigh the potential harms. Its use may be advantageous in settings where proactive approaches are implemented for periviable infants.

Enhanced Survival of 22-25 Week Preterm Infants After Proactive Care Implementation: A Comparative Analysis of Two Time Periods.

To investigate the impact of proactive perinatal care on periviable preterm infants before and after its implementation. This retrospective cohort study was conducted over a period of 10 y, from 2013 to 2019, referred to as Phase I, and from 2020 to 2022, referred to as Phase II. A total of 162 eligible infants born between 220/7 and 256/7 wk of gestation were included in this analysis. A total of 125 infants were born in phase I, and 37 infants in phase II received proactive care with minimal handling. The mortality decreased from 54.4% to 24.3% (P = 0.001). The composite outcomes of severe brain injury or death, sepsis or death and necrotizing enterocolitis or death were also improved with proactive care. Gestational age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.900; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.836-0.970], air leak syndrome (aOR 4.958; 95% CI, 1.681-14.624), massive pulmonary hemorrhage (aOR 4.944; 95% CI, 2.055-11.893), and birth in phase II (aOR 0.324; 95% CI, 0.115-0.912) were independently associated with mortality. The implementation of proactive care with minimal handling resulted in an increased survival rate and a reduction in the combined morbidities between the two time periods. The provision of proactive perinatal care with minimal handling is crucial for improving both the survival rates and clinical outcomes of these vulnerable infants.

Scandinavian perspectives on life support at the border of viability.

Advances in neonatal medicine have allowed us to rescue extremely preterm infants. However, both long-term vulnerability and the burden of treatment in the neonatal period increase with decreasing gestational age. This raises questions about the justification of life support when a baby is born at the border of viability, and has led to a so-called "grey zone", where many professionals are unsure whether provision of life support is in the child's best interest. Despite cultural, political and economic similarities, the Scandinavian countries differ in their approach to periviable infants, as seen in their respective national guidelines and practices. In Sweden, guidelines and practice are more rescue-focused at the lower end of the border of viability, Danish guidelines emphasizes the need to involve parental views in the decision-making process, whereas Norway appears to be somewhere in between. In this paper, I will give an overview of national consensus documents and practices in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, and reflect on the ethical justification for the different approaches.

The accuracy of sonographic fetal weight in very preterm infants (≤32 weeks)

ObjectiveTo examine the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight to predict birthweight in very preterm infants (<32 weeks), and to compare the accuracy of estimated fetal weight (EFW) between those small for gestational age (SGA) and those appropriate for gestational age (AGA). Study designA retrospective study was conducted of data recorded between January 2010 and March 2023. Included were women with singleton livebirths at 23+0–31+6 weeks who had an EFW within one week from delivery. Mean percentage error, mean absolute percentage error, and underestimation and overestimation rates were calculated. We compared the accuracy of EFW between SGA and AGA infants. ResultsIn total, 360 women were included. The mean absolute percentage error was 7.8 % (range 0 %–68.9 %); for 207 (57.5 %) infants the percentage error was within ±10 %. Overestimation error >10 % was observed in 102 (28.3 %) infants and errors >20 % in 34 (9.4 %). Among infants born in the periviable period (23+0 – 25+6 weeks; N = 56), the mean absolute percentage error was 9.8 % (range: 0 %–40.3 %); the value was within ±10 % for only 28 periviable infants (50 %) and exceeded 20 % for 16.1 %. Among SGA compared to AGA infants, the mean absolute percentage error was higher (11.1% vs. 6.6 %, p = 0.035). Overestimation error >10 % was more frequent among SGA than AGA infants (55 (49.1 %) vs. 47 (19.0 %), p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, SGA status was independently associated with a higher mean percentage error (beta = 0.260, p < 0.001) and an increased risk of an error >10 % (odds ratio = 2.1, 95 % confidence interval 1.2–3.5, p = 0.008). ConclusionsSonographic EFW is limited in assessing very preterm infants, particularly those who are SGA or born during the periviable period. These limitations should be considered regarding impending very preterm births and concerns about abnormal fetal growth.

Need for Gastrostomy Tube in Periviable Infants.

We sought to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with gastrostomy tube (g-tube) placement in periviable infants. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of live-born infants between 22 and 25 weeks' gestation. Infants not actively resuscitated and those with congenital anomalies were excluded from analysis. Of the 243 infants included, 158 survived until discharge. Of those that survived to discharge, 35 required g-tube prior to discharge. Maternal race/ethnicity (p = 0.006), intraventricular hemorrhage (p = 0.013), periventricular leukomalacia (p = 0.003), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD; p ≤ 0.001), and singleton gestation (p = 0.009) were associated with need for gastrostomy. In a multivariable logistic regression, maternal Black race (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-7.47; p = 0.029), singleton gestation (OR = 3.99; 95% CI: 1.28-12.4; p = 0.017) and BPD (zero g-tube placement in the no BPD arm; p ≤ 0.001) were associated with need for g-tube. A high percentage of periviable infants surviving until discharge require g-tube at our institution. In this single-center retrospective study, we noted that maternal Black race, singleton gestation, and BPD were associated with increased risk for g-tube placement in infants born between 22 and 25 weeks' gestation. The finding of increased risk with maternal Black race is consistent with previous reports of racial/ethnic disparities in preterm morbidities. Additional studies examining factors associated with successful achievement of oral feedings in preterm infants are necessary and will inform future efforts to advance equity in newborn health. · BPD, singleton birth, and Black race are associated with need for g-tube in periviable infants.. · Severe intraventricular hemorrhage is associated with increased mortality or g-tube placement in periviable infants.. · Further investigation into the relationship between maternal race and g-tube placement is warranted..

Prolonged renal function impairment in infants born during the peri-viable period: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study

BackgroundThe number of infants born during the peri-viable period who survive has been increasing. AimTo clarify renal function in infants from the time of birth during the peri-viable period until their due date. Study designThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center. SubjectsWe reviewed the data of infants born at ≤28 weeks of gestation between 2018 and 2022 at our hospital. The infants were divided into the following groups: born at 22–24 weeks vs. 25–28 weeks (appropriate-for-gestational age [AGA] infants), and AGA infants vs. small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants (born at 22–28 weeks). Outcome measuresWe compared the perinatal data and renal function of the infants from birth until their due date. ResultsEighty-one infants were included. Their serum creatinine, fractional excretion of sodium, and urine glucose levels were high or positive soon after birth but gradually improved. The urine albumin level was significantly higher among AGA infants born at 22–24 weeks, even at term equivalent age, than among those born at 25–28 weeks. ConclusionsPersistent renal insufficiency was observed even around the term equivalent age in peri-viable infants. Follow-up data collected after the neonatal period should be investigated in these infants.

Withdrawal and withholding of life sustaining treatment (WWLST): an under recognised factor in the morbidity or mortality of periviable infants?-a narrative review.

The morbidity and mortality of infants born extremely preterm varies substantially across networks, within countries and throughout the globe. Most of the literature tends to focus on the management at birth and choices around active resuscitation of extremely preterm infants. Withdrawal and withholding of life sustaining treatment (WWLST) is an important and central process in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and practices vary substantially. As such, our objective in this review was to explore whether end of life decisions also contribute to variations in the morbidity and mortality of periviable infants. This narrative literature review is based on studies from the last 15 years found using several searches of medical databases (OVID Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Systematic Reviews) performed between March 2021 and December 2023. Just as outcomes in periviable infants vary, the rates of and processes behind WWLST differ in the periviable population. Variation increases as gestational age decreases. Parental involvement is crucial to share decision making but the circumstances and rates of parental involvement differ. Strict guidelines in end-of-life care may not be appropriate, however there is a need for more targeted guidance for periviable infants as a specific population. The current literature available relating to periviable infants or WWLST is minimal, with many datasets rapidly becoming outdated. Further research is needed to establish the role of WWLST in variation of periviable infants' outcomes. The unification of data, acquisition of more recent datasets and inclusion of variables relating to end-of-life decisions in data collection will aid in this process.

487 - Trend in survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes of periviable infants: a single center study

487 - Trend in survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes of periviable infants: a single center study

486 - Outcomes of periviable infants with birthweight less than 400 grams: a single center study

486 - Outcomes of periviable infants with birthweight less than 400 grams: a single center study

Hospital Factors Associated with the Survival of Infants Born at Periviable Gestation: The USA National Database.

Background: Reports on the survival of infants born at periviable gestation (GA of ≤24 weeks and birth weight of <500 gm) vary significantly. We aimed to determine hospital factors associated with their survival and to assess the trend for the timing of postnatal mortality in these periviable infants. Methods: We utilized the de-identified National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). National data were analyzed for the years 2010-2018. Hospitals were categorized according to delivery volume, USA regions, and teaching status. Results: We identified 33,998,014 infants born during the study period; 76,231 infants were ≤24 weeks. Survival at birth and first 2 days of life was greatest in urban teaching hospitals in infants <24 weeks and those who completed 24 weeks, respectively. The Northeast region has the lowest survival rate. There was a significant delay in the postnatal day of mortality in periviable infants. Conclusions: Hospital factors are associated with increased survival rates. Improved survival in large teaching hospitals supports the need for the regionalization of care in infants born at the limits of viability. There was a significant delay in the postnatal mortality day.

Factors that influence the choice for neonatal resuscitation in periviable deliveries

Background Periviable preterm birth, defined as delivery between 20+0/7 to 25+6/7 weeks, represents less than 1% of all births but contributes to up to 40% of all infant deaths. Scenarios with high risks of morbidity and mortality to the maternal-neonatal dyad may result in periviable preterm delivery. These situations require shared decision making between healthcare teams and families to decide whether maternal and neonatal patients are candidates for obstetric interventions and neonatal resuscitation at delivery, respectively, and to determine the optimal mode of delivery at the cusp of fetal viability. Objective The primary objective is to describe the influence of patient demographics (i.e. maternal race) and societal factors (i.e. maternal religion) on the decision between neonatal resuscitation and comfort care in periviable deliveries. Our secondary goals are: 1. to quantify the use of obstetric interventions (antenatal steroids for fetal lung maturity, magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection, tocolytics and GBS prophylaxis) at the threshold of viability and 2. to establish whether planned neonatal resuscitation versus comfort care influenced the choice of cesarean versus vaginal delivery. Methods This project is a retrospective cohort study; electronic medical records were queried for data at Ascension St. Vincent Women's Hospital of mothers and neonates delivered at 22 0/7 to 24 6/7 from January 1, 2016 to July 31, 2020. Study patients were separated to compare outcomes between those that received neonatal resuscitation and those for whom comfort care was provided at 22, 23, and 24 weeks gestational age. Results were further stratified by obstetric interventions, mode of delivery, and maternal race and maternal religion with statistical analysis utilizing Fisher's Exact Test. Results Of the 111 patient charts originally identified, 73 patients met inclusion criteria. For those patients that opted for obstetric interventions, the most likely intervention was antenatal steroids (86%), followed by magnesium for fetal neuroprotection (63%) and tocolytics (63%), with the least likely intervention being Group Beta Streptococcus antibiotic prophylaxis (43%). The overall cesarean delivery rate was 53%. Cesarean delivery was selected with increasing gestational age: 9.1%, 52%, and 67% at 22, 23, and 24 weeks respectively. While there was no significant difference in those that opted for comfort care versus neonatal resuscitation at 22 weeks, the majority of patients at 23 and 24 weeks overwhelmingly opted for resuscitation; 5 infants (45%) were resuscitated at 22 weeks, 24 infants (96%) at 23 weeks, and 36 infants (97%) at 24 weeks. Planned neonatal resuscitation increased by gestational age. Patients opting for comfort care were more likely to deliver vaginally (87%) versus those that opted for resuscitation (41%), (Fisher's Exact Test, p=0.02), with the most common diagnoses documented for cesarean delivery being malpresentation followed by fetal distress. As for the influence of maternal race, African American patients opted for resuscitation 100% of the time, regardless of gestational age, in comparison to Caucasian (87%) and "other" (62%) counterparts. As for maternal religion, there was no significant difference between patients that self-identified as Christian, Roman Catholic, Unaffiliated or Other and their decision for neonatal resuscitation at 22 weeks. However, at 23 and 24 weeks, the only patients to opt in favor of comfort care were patients that were Unaffiliated with an organized religion. Overall, our infant survival rates were 7.6%, 44%, 63%, at 22, 23, and 24 weeks respectively, with an overall survival rate of 41%. Conclusion While the decision to resuscitate periviable preterm infants is multifactorial, demographic and societal factors influence the decision for planned resuscitation for this vulnerable patient population. Planned neonatal resuscitation rates were higher among patients identified as African American than other demographics included in this study. Patients not affiliated with an organized religion are less likely to opt for resuscitation at later gestational ages. Regardless ofplans for resuscitation, the majority of patients received obstetric interventions including antenatal steroids and cesarean delivery. These findings may be used by clinicians for shared decision making during future antenatal counseling sessions.

Perinatal optimisation for periviable birth and outcomes: a 4-year network analysis (2018-2021) across a change in national guidance.

The British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) released their revised framework for extremely preterm infant management in 2019. This revised framework promotes consideration of perinatal optimisation and survival-focused care from 22 weeks gestation onwards. This was a departure from the previous BAPM framework which recommended comfort care as the only recommended management for infants <23 + 0 weeks. Our study evaluates the clinical impact that this updated framework has had across the Northwest of England. We utilised anonymised network data from periviable infants delivered across the region to examine changes in perinatal optimisation practices and survival outcomes following the release of the latest BAPM framework. Our data show that after the introduction of the updated framework there has been an increase in perinatal optimisation practices for periviable infants and an 80% increase in the number of infants born at 22 weeks receiving survival-focused care and admission to a neonatal unit. There remain significant discrepancies in optimisation practices by gestational age, which may be contributing to the static survival rates that were observed in the lowest gestational ages.

Resuscitation, survival and morbidity of extremely preterm infants in California 2011–2019

ObjectiveTo describe changes over time in resuscitation, survival, and morbidity of extremely preterm infants in California.Study designThis population-based, retrospective cohort study includes infants born ≤28 weeks. Linked birth certificates and hospital discharge records were used to evaluate active resuscitation, survival, and morbidity across two epochs (2011–2014, 2015–2019).ResultsOf liveborn infants, 0.6% were born ≤28 weeks. Active resuscitation increased from 16.9% of 22-week infants to 98.1% of 25-week infants and increased over time in 22-, 23-, and 25-week infants (p-value ≤ 0.01). Among resuscitated infants, survival to discharge increased from 33.2% at 22 weeks to 96.1% at 28 weeks. Survival without major morbidity improved over time for 28-week infants (p-value < 0.01).ConclusionAmong infants ≤28 weeks, resuscitation and survival increased with gestational age and morbidity decreased. Over time, active resuscitation of periviable infants and morbidity-free survival of 28-week infants increased. These trends may inform counseling around extremely preterm birth.

Association of mode of delivery with short-term and neurodevelopmental outcomes in periviable singleton infants: A nationwide database study.

To evaluate the association of mode of delivery (MOD) with short-term and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of corrected age (CA) in periviable singleton infants. This retrospective cohort study of the Taiwan Premature Infant Follow-up Network database between 2010 and 2016 compared non-anomalous singleton deliveries (cesarean delivery [CD] vs vaginal delivery [VD]) between 22 0/7 and 25 6/7 gestational weeks. Major morbidities, mortality, and neurodevelopmental outcomes were evaluated at 2-year CA. The CD and VD groups included 354 and 472 infants, respectively. The intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) rate was lower in the CD group (54% vs 66%, P = 0.001), but severe IVH differed non-significantly between groups (20% vs 26%, P = 0.057). In the small-for-gestational age subgroup, CD was associated with lower IVH (56% vs 84%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.69) and better survival without neurodevelopmental impairment (29% vs 8%, aOR, 6.64, 95% CI 1.02-43.29) after controlling for potential confounders. The optimal MOD for periviable singleton birth and its impact are unclear. CD in periviable singleton births is associated with a decreased IVH risk, without improvement in severe IVH, mortality, or neurodevelopment at 2-year CA. The small-for-gestational age subgroup may benefit from CD for better survival without neurodevelopmental impairment.

Potential Missed Opportunities for Antenatal Corticosteroid Exposure and Outcomes Among Periviable Births: Observational Cohort Study

ABSTRACT Antenatal corticosteroid (ANCS) exposure reduces preterm infant death and morbidities, such as intracranial hemorrhage. Although observational studies suggest periviable infants may benefit from this treatment, many eligible women do not receive ANCSs due to unclear policies, lack of opportunity, or inconsistent care. Professional societies and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development recommend administering ANCSs at 24 weeks' gestation for all at-risk pregnancies and as early as 22 weeks with planned postnatal treatment. The aim of this study was to assess whether potential missed opportunities for ANCSs increase as gestational age decreases and are associated with higher rates of hospital mortality or severe brain injury. This was an observational cohort study of infants born at 24 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers from 2006 to 2018. Included were infants at 220/7 to 256/7 weeks of gestation, without major birth defects, and a birth weight of 401 to 1000 g. Data were collected prospectively from birth to discharge, transfer, death, or 120 days. Antenatal corticosteroid exposure was defined as infants who received partial, complete, or repeat courses of the treatment. Potential missed opportunities for exposure were defined as infants who received no ANCSs, despite potentially having sufficient time to receive prenatal antibiotics, were administered magnesium sulfate, or experience prolonged rupture of membranes. Severe brain injury was defined as intracranial hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia on cranial imaging. The primary outcome was the rate of ANCS exposure and potential missed opportunities at each gestational age. Secondary outcomes included death and severe brain injury. A total of 7957 infants who were actively treated postnatally were included in the primary analysis. Of these, 87.6% had ANCS exposure, 5.7% had no exposure but potential missed opportunities for exposure, and 6.7% had no exposure and no potential missed opportunities. Potential missed opportunities for exposure were more common in infants born at 22 and 23 weeks versus 25 weeks (22 weeks: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 11.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.52–16.27; P &lt; 0.001); 23 weeks: aRR, 3.24; 95% CI, 2.44–4.29; P &lt; 0.001). No difference was observed between 24 and 25 weeks (24 weeks: aRR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.82–1.42). From 2006 to 2018, infants at 22 weeks saw the largest increase in exposure to ANCSs (12.5%–87.2%) and a decrease in the rate of potential missed opportunities (68.8%–2.6%). Overall, the rate of mortality was 23% lower among infants in the exposure group than for those in the missed opportunities group (31% vs 54.8%; aRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70–0.84; P &lt; 0.001). Infants in the exposure group had lower risk of severe brain injury than those in the missed opportunities group (25% vs 44.5%; aRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55–0.73; P &lt; 0.001), with no significant variation by gestational age. In conclusion, the potential for missed opportunities for ANCS exposure was more common among periviable infants at 22 and 23 weeks compared with those at 25 weeks of gestation. Moreover, exposure to ANCSs was associated with lower rates of mortality and severe brain injury.

Trends in Active Treatment of Live-Born Neonates Between 22 Weeks 0 Days and 25 Weeks 6 Days by Gestational Age and Maternal Race and Ethnicity in the US, 2014 to 2020

Trends in Active Treatment of Live-Born Neonates Between 22 Weeks 0 Days and 25 Weeks 6 Days by Gestational Age and Maternal Race and Ethnicity in the US, 2014 to 2020