Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Research Articles

Metastasis-associated fibroblasts in peritoneal surface malignancies.

Over decades, peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) have been associated with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. However, advancements in perioperative systemic chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have significantly improved clinical outcomes. PSMs predominantly result from the spread of intra-abdominal neoplasia, which then form secondary peritoneal metastases. Colorectal, ovarian, and gastric cancers are the most common contributors. Despite diverse primary origins, the uniqueness of the peritoneum microenvironment shapes the common features of PSMs. Peritoneal metastization involves complex interactions between tumour cells and the peritoneal microenvironment. Fibroblasts play a crucial role, contributing to tumour development, progression, and therapy resistance. Peritoneal metastasis-associated fibroblasts (MAFs) in PSMs exhibit high heterogeneity. Single-cell RNA sequencing technology has revealed that immune-regulatory cancer-associated fibroblasts (iCAFs) seem to be the most prevalent subtype in PSMs. In addition, other major subtypes as myofibroblastic CAFs (myCAFs) and matrix CAFs (mCAFs) were frequently observed across PSMs studies. Peritoneal MAFs are suggested to originate from mesothelial cells, submesothelial fibroblasts, pericytes, endothelial cells, and omental-resident cells. This plasticity and heterogeneity of CAFs contribute to the complex microenvironment in PSMs, impacting treatment responses. Understanding these interactions is crucial for developing targeted and local therapies to improve PSMs patient outcomes.

Top Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Articles from 2022 to Inform your Cancer Practice.

Over the last few decades, the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without regional-based peritoneal therapies such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has evolved in the management of patients with peritoneal surface malignances (PSMs). Despite the benefit of CRS in improving oncologic outcomes, significant challenges remain in the treatment of patients with advanced PSMs, and the role of HIPEC continues to be questioned. Additionally, while there has been improvement in perioperative outcomes, long-term survival remains poor. As a result, there is much need to improve our understanding of the processes that drive tumor biology, thereby improving patient selection for various treatment approaches. Additionally, newer therapies are needed for patients who remain poor surgical candidates and who progress on systemic therapy. This article highlights recently published studies that we consider impactful in the care of patients with PSMs.

The role of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of primary and secondary peritoneal malignancies-experience from a tertiary care center in Germany.

Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) are commonly known to have a dismal prognosis. Over the past decades, novel techniques such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) have been introduced for the treatment of PSM which could improve the overall survival and quality of life of patients with PSM. The decision to proceed with CRS and HIPEC is often challenging due the complexity of the disease, the extent of the procedure, associated side effects, and potential risks. Here, we present our experience with CRS and HIPEC to add to the ongoing discussion about eligibility criteria, technical approach, and expected outcomes and contribute to the evolution of this powerful and promising tool in the multidisciplinary treatment of patients with primary and secondary PSM. A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted and included a total of 40 patients treated with CRS and HIPEC from April 2020 to September 2022 at the University Hospital Münster Department of Surgery. All patients had histologically confirmed primary or secondary peritoneal malignancies of various primary origins. Our study included 22 patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer (55%), 8 with pseudomyxoma peritonei (20%), 4 with mesothelioma of the peritoneum (10%), and 6 patients with PSM originating from other primary tumor locations. Median PCI at time of cytoreduction was 4 (0-25). Completeness of cytoreduction score was 0 in 37 patients (92.5%), 1 in two patients (5%), and 2 in one patient (2.5%). Median overall survival across all patients was 3.69years. Complete cytoreduction during CRS and HIPEC can be achieved for patients with low PCI, for patients with high PCI in low-grade malignancies, and even for patients with initially high PCI in high-grade malignancies following a significant reduction of cancer burden due to extensive preoperative treatment with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy.

Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Cytoreductive Surgery With Upper-Abdominal Peritonectomy for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei With Low Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index: A Pilot Study.

Our study's objective was to provide the method for, and preliminary findings from, robot-assisted cytoreductive surgery (r-CRS) combined with upper-abdominal peritonectomy in pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) with limited peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). We conducted a retrospective pilot study on consecutive patients with PSM secondary to pseudomyxoma peritonei with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of under 10 who were indicated for r-CRS combined with upper-abdominal peritectomy. Perioperative and 30-day major morbidity and mortality characteristics were analyzed and compared with cases in which laparoscopic CRS (l-CRS) was performed under the same conditions. Six patients underwent r-CRS combined with an upper-abdominal partial peritonectomy. Their mean PCI was 4.83. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. The mean duration of the operation was 156.8 minutes. There was no major complication and no mortality. The mean length of hospital stay after surgery was 6.33 days. r-CRS resulted in less blood loss, a lower C-reactive protein level, and a shorter length of hospital stay that were significantly different compared with those of l-CRS. This is the initial technical report of a robotic approach for CRS combined with upper-abdominal peritonectomy. r-CRS with a combined upper-abdominal peritonectomy was shown to be safe and feasible for PMP with limited PSM.

Outcomes of minimal access cytoreductive surgery (M-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC vs. open cytoreductive surgery (O-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies: a meta-analysis.

Minimal Access Surgery (MAS) has shown better peri-operative outcomes with equivalent oncological outcomes in gastrointestinal and thoracic oncology. Open CRS (O-CRS) procedure accompanies inevitable and significant surgical morbidity in patients. The aim of the review article is to compare outcomes of M-CRS and HIPEC/EPIC with open procedure in peritoneal surface malignancies. Comprehensive search of databases was done and total 2,807 articles were found (2793-PubMed and 14-Cochrane review). PRISMA flow chart was prepared and 14 articles were selected. Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using random-effects model (DerSimonian Laird) and fixed effect model. Publication bias was tested with Funnel plot and Egger's regression test. Quality of studies was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Patients in both groups [total (732), M-CRS(319), O-CRS(413)] were similar in demographic characteristics. Peri-operative outcomes were significantly better in M-CRS group in terms of blood loss SMD=-2.379, p<0.001 (95 %CI-2.952 to-1.805), blood transfusion RR=0.598, p=0.011 (95 % CI 0.402 to 0.889), bowel recovery SMD=-0.843, p=0.01 (95 % CI-1.487 to-0.2), hospital stay SMD=-2.348, p<0.001 (95 % CI-3.178 to-1.519) and total morbidity RR=0.538, p<0.001 (95 % CI 0.395 to 0.731). Duration of surgery SMD=-0.0643 (95 % CI-0.993 to 0.865, p=0.892) and CC0 score RR=1.064 (95 % CI 0.992 to 1.140, p=0.083) had no significant difference. Limited studies which evaluated survival showed similar outcomes. This meta-analysis shows that M-CRS and HIPEC/EPIC is feasible and has better peri-operative outcomes compared to open procedure in patients with limited peritoneal carcinoma index (PCI) peritoneal surface malignancies. Survival outcomes were not calculated. Further studies are warranted in this regard.

Surgical Treatment and Outcome of Ovarian Cancer Patients With Liver Metastases: Experience of a Tertiary Hepatic and Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center.

The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the patterns, perioperative outcomes, and survival rates of patients subjected to hepatic resections for ovarian-derived liver metastasis as part of cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Furthermore, we investigated two subgroups of tumor patterns: hematogenous liver metastasis and infiltrative liver metastatic spread. A retrospective study was conducted. Patients from a University Tertiary Hepatic and Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center with primary or recurrent ovarian cancer, who underwent liver resection as part of cytoreductive surgery between January 1992 and December 2022, were included. Data from 35 patients were analyzed. Both median overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 24.97 months. In a multivariate setting, the combined effect of age, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, body mass index, hematogenous liver metastasis vs. infiltrative spread types, and HIPEC (HR=0.2372; 95%CI=0.0719-0.7823; p=0.0181) over OS was tested. Survival analysis revealed no differences between the two metastatic spread types (OS: p=0.9720; DSS: p=0.9610). Younger age (p=0.0301), splenectomy (p=0.0320), lesser omentectomy (p=0.0178), and right upper quadrant peritonectomy (p=0.0373) were more characteristic for those patients with infiltrative liver metastatic spread. Complete cytoreductive surgery, including hepatic resection is a feasible approach with or without additional HIPEC, which may provide survival benefit for patients with advanced and/or recurrent ovarian cancer. If metastatic and infiltrative liver involvement is suspected, liver-specific imaging is recommended.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in New Zealand: peri-operative outcomes and service development over a decade.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the standard of care for selected cases of peritoneal surface malignancy. However, due to its morbidity and learning curve, it is only delivered in six centres in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). In this study, we report peri-operative morbidity and mortality following CRS/HIPEC at Waikato and Braemar Hospitals, which have treated patients from all regions of AoNZ since 2008. We retrospectively reviewed a database of all patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC from 01/01/2008 to 01/11/2020 at Waikato and Braemar Hospitals. Two-hundred and forty procedures were performed for 221 patients with a mean age of 55, including 22 (9.2%) re-do procedures. One hundred and eighty-six cases were European, 32 were Māori, and 16 were Pasifika. There were 152 pseudomyxoma peritonei, 39 colorectal adenocarcinomas, 29 appendiceal cancers, 8 ovarian cancers, 6 peritoneal mesothelioma, and 6 other tumour types. The median PCI was 16. HIPEC was administered to 196 out of 196 CC0/1 cases (100%) and 3 out of 44 CC2/3 cases (6.8%). Fifty-six cases (23.3%) had at least one major complication. There were two mortalities (0.8%) within 30 days. The median length of stay was 11 days. Operative duration was identified as an independent risk factor for major complications. There was considerable variation in the number of referrals from different regions of AoNZ. Over time, a decline in major complication rate is seen with increased case volume. The Waikato region has achieved favourable short-term outcomes following CRS/HIPEC.

Efficacy of Different Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Strains for the Treatment of Murine Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Effective treatment options for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are scarce. Oncolytic virotherapy with recombinant vaccinia viruses might constitute a novel treatment option for PSM. We aimed to identify the most effective oncolytic vaccinia virus strain in two murine mesothelioma cell lines and the oncolytic potential in a murine model of peritoneal mesothelioma. Cell lines AB12 and AC29 were infected in vitro with vaccinia virus strains Lister (GLV-1h254), Western Reserve (GLV-0b347), and Copenhagen (GLV-4h463). The virus strain GLV-0b347 was shown most effective in vitro and was further investigated by intraperitoneal (i.p.) application to AB12 and AC29 mesothelioma-bearing mice. Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of virotherapy were assessed by evaluating the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), virus detection in tumor tissues and ascites, virus growth curves, and comparison of overall survival. After i.p. injection of GLV-0b347, virus was detected in both tumor cells and ascites. In comparison to mock-treated mice, overall survival was significantly prolonged, ascites was less frequent and PCI values declined. However, effective treatment was only observed in animals with limited tumor burden at the time point of virus application. Nonetheless, intraperitoneal virotherapy with GLV-0b347 might constitute a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma. Additional treatment modifications and combinational regimes will be investigated to further enhance treatment efficacy.

Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Metastasis: Improved Short-term Outcomes Revealed Through Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the standard of care for selected cases of primary or secondary peritoneal surface malignancies. The study aims to verify the postoperative advantages of laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC at our institution was performed. Records were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were divided into two groups, laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC and open CRS-HIPEC, and matched for age, ASA, comorbidities, Prior Surgical Score (PSS), and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) using propensity score analysis. Demographics, clinical, and operative data were compared between the two groups using chi-square or Fisher's exact test and T-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Between 2016 and 2022, 13 patients underwent laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC. These were matched to 32 open CRS-HIPEC patients (1:2.5), obtaining comparable demographics and clinical and preoperative variables. The two groups had a similar duration and complexity of surgery; however, the mean estimated blood loss was lower during laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.008). Overall morbidity rates were lower after laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC (p = 0.043); however, grade III-IV complications, reintervention, and 90-day readmission rates were comparable between the two groups. A faster postoperative recovery in all aspects of the postoperative course was observed, including hospital length of stay (6 vs. 9.5days, p = 0.003). Laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC is a feasible and safe procedure and shows improved short-term postoperative outcomes in selected patients with limited peritoneal disease compared to the open approach.

Eliminating the need for preoperative intravenous hyperhydration: Sodium thiosulfate as nephrotoxicity prevention in HIPEC-treated patients – A retrospective analysis

BackgroundCytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for peritoneal metastases. However, HIPEC with cisplatin is associated with renal toxicity. Sodium thiosulfate (ST) has been shown to prevent cisplatin-induced toxicity. MethodsA retrospective, single-center analysis of patients treated curatively for peritoneal surface malignancy, who underwent cytoreductive surgery with cisplatin-based HIPEC between 2015 and 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the management of cisplatin-induced renal toxicity: preoperative hyperhydration alone (PHH), preoperative hyperhydration with ST (PHH + ST), and ST alone. Renal function and complications, in terms of Acute (AKI) and chronic kidney injury (CKI), were monitored and analyzed during 3 postoperative months. ResultsThis study included 220 consecutive patients. Mean serum creatinine levels were 95, 57 and 61 mmol/L, for PHH, PHH + ST and ST groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) were 96, 94 and 78 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively (p < 0.001). AKI and CKI are respectively for PHH, PHH + ST and ST groups were 21 % (n = 46), 1 % (n = 2) and 0 % vs 19 % (n = 42), 0 % and 0 % (p < 0.001), for pairwise analysis did not show any difference between PHH + ST and ST alone combination, regarding nephrological outcomes. All patients were followed 3 months postoperatively. ConclusionThere is no need for preoperative hyperhydration when sodium-thiosulfate is used to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. These findings have implications for improving and simplifying the management of patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing HIPEC with cisplatin.

International Expert Consensus on Defining Textbook Oncologic Outcomes in Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis.

Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is a composite metric shown to correlate with improved survival after curative intent oncologic procedures. Despite increasing use among disciplines in surgical oncology, no consensus exists for its definition in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). An international consensus-based study employed a Delphi methodology to achieve agreement. Fifty-four senior surgeons from the peritoneal surface malignancies field received a questionnaire comprising TOO parameters divided into 3 surgical domains: operative, short-term, and long-term postoperative outcomes. Two online meetings with participants defined the new criteria. Consensus was achieved when 75% of agreement rate was reached. Clinical data of patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastasis between 2010 and 2022 from 1 designated center (Sheba Medical Center) were collected, the consensus definition applied and outcomes analyzed. Thirty-eight surgeons (70%) participated. Expert consensus TOO parameters for colorectal peritoneal metastasis CRS and HIPEC included the absence of unplanned reoperations during 30 days postoperation, absence of severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III), absence of unplanned readmissions during 30 days postoperation, 90-day postoperative mortality, and absence of contraindications for chemotherapy within 12 weeks from operation, and included the achievement of complete cytoreduction (CC0). The study cohort consisted of 251 patients, and 151 (60%) met TOO criteria. Patients who achieved TOO had significantly better overall survival (median 67.5 months, 95% CI) vs patients who did not achieve TOO (median 44.6 months, 95% CI, p < 0.001) and significantly improved disease-free survival (median, 12 months, 95% CI, vs 9 months, 95% CI, p = 0.01). Achievement of TOO as defined by consensus statement is associated with improved survival.

Response to letter to the editor "Elevating Standards: A Comprehensive Model for Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Management in Developing Healthcare Systems".

Response to letter to the editor "Elevating Standards: A Comprehensive Model for Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Management in Developing Healthcare Systems".

Long-term survival following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in Waikato, Aotearoa New Zealand: a 12-year experience.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have improved survival for selected cases of peritoneal surface malignancy. In 2008, a CRS/HIPEC service was first established in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) at Waikato and Braemar Hospitals in the Waikato region. This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC from 1 January 2008 to 1 November 2020 at Waikato and Braemar Hospitals. We analysed long-term survival and predictors of survival for each tumour type. 240 procedures were performed for 221 patients, including 22 re-do procedures. Cases had a median peritoneal cancer index of 16. Complete cytoreduction (CC0-1) was achieved in 196 cases (81.7%). All complete cytoreduction cases received HIPEC. There were 152 pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), 39 colorectal cancers (CRC), 29 appendiceal cancers, eight ovarian cancers, six peritoneal mesotheliomas, and six other cancers. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for PMP with acellular mucin, low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei, and high-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei with or without signet cells were 91.6%, 80.5%, and 72.2%, respectively. 2- and 5-year OS in CRC were 56.7% and 40.4%. The achievement of complete cytoreduction improved the 5-year OS to 87.9% across all PMP and 45.1% in colorectal cancer. Incomplete cytoreduction predicted worse survival in appendiceal PMP. In colorectal cancer, worse survival was predicted in those who had incomplete cytoreduction, liver metastasis, and presentation with obstruction and perforation. Favourable long-term outcomes following CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancy have been achieved in AoNZ through the Waikato peritonectomy service.

ASO Author Reflections: Decoding the Complexities of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Procedural Billing: A Potential Blueprint for the Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Surgeon.

ASO Author Reflections: Decoding the Complexities of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Procedural Billing: A Potential Blueprint for the Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Surgeon.

ASO Visual Abstract: Cost Analysis and Financial Implications of a Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program in the United States.

ASO Visual Abstract: Cost Analysis and Financial Implications of a Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program in the United States.

326TiP Prospective study to correlate peritoneal disease burden on imaging with intraoperative findings in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies

326TiP Prospective study to correlate peritoneal disease burden on imaging with intraoperative findings in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies

Exploring the perception of value in cancer care: A comparison of patients, providers, and payers.

60 Background: As the healthcare system moves towards value-based models, defining "value" is crucial. In the context of cancer care, there are multiple metrics essential to the aggregate of “value”, however their relative importance to the various stakeholders in value-based care are unknown. This study assesses the priorities of key stakeholders in value-based cancer care. Methods: A survey was administered to international cancer patients through online support groups and to healthcare providers and payers within a large regional health system. Respondents ranked the relative importance of treatment costs, longevity, treatment experience, functional and emotional well-being, and longevity (survival). Agreement among groups was analyzed using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W). The priorities of each group were compared among stakeholders. Results: A total of 1,103 respondents including 782 patients, 216 healthcare providers, and 105 payers/policymakers participated. The majority of respondents were female (70%), white (89%), and had completed a four-year degree (63%). The patient cohort represented six continents and 20 cancer types. The most common cancer site was the pancreas (35%), followed by the esophagus (11%), bile duct (10%), and peritoneal surface malignancy (9%). Among providers, 29% were physicians, 21% nurses, 11% advanced practice providers, and 39% other providers. Among payers, 24% were administrators and 24% held were business analysts. Patients prioritized longevity and functional independence (W=39%, p&lt;0.001), while providers prioritized patient emotional well-being over functional independence and experience (W=35%, p&lt;0.001). Payers prioritized emotional well-being and patient longevity (W=26%, p&lt;0.001). The overall ratings for each value metric among the three groups differed significantly (all p &lt; 0.05). All groups ranked treatment costs as least important. Rankings were consistent across gender, education level, and time spent with patients within the cohorts. Conclusions: With general consistencies amongst the views of stakeholders, there are remains significant discordances in the perception of value. While the highest priority across stakeholder groups differed, costs of treatment consistently ranked as the least important value domain. These findings have important implications for the development of value-based cancer care models that account for the diverse perspectives of key stakeholders. Further research is needed to develop a generalizable measure of healthcare value.

Cost Analysis and Financial Implications of a Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program in the USA.

We aimed to describe the financial implications of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in the USA. We conducted a retrospective cost analysis of 100 CRS/HIPEC procedures to examine the impact of patient and procedural factors on hospital costs and reimbursement. A comparison of surgeons' work relative value units (wRVUs) between CRS/HIPEC and a representative sample of complex surgical oncology procedures was made to assess the physicians' compensation rate. Univariable and multivariable backward logistic regression was used to analyze the association between perioperative variables and high direct cost (HDCs). The median direct cost per CRS/HIPEC procedure was US $44,770. The median hospital reimbursement was US $43,066, while professional reimbursement was US $8608, resulting in a positive contribution margin of US $7493/procedure. However, the contribution margin significantly varied with the payer mix. Privately insured patients had a positive median contribution margin of US $23,033, whereas Medicare-insured patients had a negative contribution margin of US $13,034. Length of stay (LOS) had the most significant association with HDC, and major complications had the most significant association with LOS. Finally, CRS/HIPEC procedures generated a median of 13 wRVU/h, which is significantly lower than the wRVU/h generated by open pancreatoduodenectomies, open gastrectomies, and hepatectomies. However, higher operation complexity and multiple visceral resections help compensate for the relatively low wRVU/h. CRS/HIPEC is an expensive operation, and prolonged LOS has the most significant impact on the total cost of the procedure. High-quality care is essential to improve patient outcomes and maintain the economic sustainability of the procedure.

Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM) is a Unique Entity that Deserves a Distinct Awareness Ribbon

Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM) is a Unique Entity that Deserves a Distinct Awareness Ribbon

Epidemiology of psychiatric disorders following cytoreductive surgeries plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective cohort analysis

The peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) is an advanced disease, the prognosis of which has been radically improved since the development of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). These procedures are associated with many complications. However, very few data are available regarding the psychiatric morbidities that might occur. The present study assessed the epidemiology of depressive mood and anxiety during the 6 months following the procedure. The analysis of a prospective cohort that included patients who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC between December 2016 and December 2019 was performed. A total of 115 patients were included. During the 6-months follow-up, the mean (SD) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale –D (HADS-D) score was 7.8 (48) and a significant increase compared with the pre-operative period (t(49) = − 4.36, p < 0.005) was found. Thirty-seven patients (32%) had a HADS-D score higher than 7. The incidence of a HADS-D score higher than 7 during the follow-up was 0.05 patient per patient-month. Anxiety and the overall mental disorders intensity scores also increased. The results showed an important increase of mental disorders and their intensity during the 6-months following a CRS with or without HIPEC.