Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Research Articles

#2784 Deep learning algorithm predicts individual ultrafiltration trajectories for patients on automated peritoneal dialysis 12 weeks ahead

Abstract Background and Aims Adequate small solute clearance and ultrafiltration (UF) are the main requirements for fluid and salt homeostasis on peritoneal dialysis (PD). New automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) systems that allow remote patient monitoring in terms of PD treatment analysis have the potential to improve clinical outcomes. UF on APD although dependent on PD prescription, i.e. fill volumes and glucose concentration, exhibits substantial intra- and interindividual variation, even day-by-day. As conventional statistical methods are not able to assess these complex non-linear relationships adequately, we aimed to build a deep learning algorithm to predict ultrafiltration trajectories of individual patients 12 weeks ahead. Method Data on daily UF and PD prescriptions (i.e., glucose concentration, fill volumes) was extracted from the APD cycler management software (PD Link, Baxter, IL, USA) and patient charts at the Medical University of Vienna, for a secondary analysis of this cohort. The Keras high-level API for TensorFlow in R software (R Core Team 2023) was used to create a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network based on historic prescription and gcUF data of 26 weeks (after the first 90 days of APD) to predict individual UF trajectories for the following 12 weeks. Results APD machine readouts from a total of 123 patients, with a mean time on PD of 117 (±73) days, were retrieved. The final recurrent neural network consisted of four LSTM layers with 64 cells each, sigmoid activation. The final model was fit using 30 epochs, 49 steps per epoch, and recurrent dropout to avoid overfitting. A 40-40-20% data split was used to train, validate, and test the model adequately. This deep learning algorithm was able to predict individual UF values, for each day of the upcoming 12 weeks, with an accuracy of at mean 201ml. Upon visual inspection, predicted individual UF trajectories smoothly resemble the overall day-by-day trajectory of the patient but fail to account for extreme spikes in either direction. Conclusion In conclusion, historic daily APD cycler and prescription data in coalescence with respective daily measurements of membrane function (i.e., gcUF) can be used to predict individual daily ultrafiltration values and trajectories of APD patients 12 weeks ahead using a deep learning algorithm. Therefore, continuous collection of PD prescription data and UF measurements may be used to monitor peritoneal membrane function of patients on APD and alert clinical teams upon detection of relevant changes of UF trajectories already 12 weeks ahead to facilitate early intervention. In contrast to current “screening” methods on PD, i.e., Peritoneal Equilibrium Test, these methods could reduce treatment burden.

#1814 Infection associated pancreatitis in peritoneal dialysis, a case report

Abstract Background and Aims Peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients seem to have a higher incidence of acute alithiasic pancreatitis. Though rare and with some suggested triggers described in the literature, this is still a poorly understood and potentially life-threatening complication. We present a 60 years old woman concluding antimicrobial therapy with an icodextrin night-dwell regimen for peritonitis presenting with epigastric pain. This work reviews our approach to cloudy effluent from non-infectious causes during an infection while managing acute pancreatitis in the PD setting. We report diagnostic difficulties and treatment considerations with a positive outcome. Method We present a 60 years old woman on PD for one year presenting to the emergency room in November of 2023 with severe epigastric pain, nausea and emesis. She suffered from stage 5 chronic kidney disease due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and had disease complications as anemia and secondary hyperthyroidism controlled within targets. She was on automated PD (APD) with glucose based solutions. She was on the 17th of 21 days antibiogram guided treatment (ceftazidime) for a Enterobacter ludwigii PD-related peritonitis with good clinical evolution and peritoneal effluent (PE) leukocyte count per μl from 1258 to 91 in 5 days. In the previous 3 months she had had 2 other infectious episodes. A bacteremic urinary tract infection to E. coli associated with peritonitis treated with antibiogram guided therapy (ceftazidime) followed by C. difficile colitis treated with oral vancomycin. During each infection period she transitioned from APD to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with an icodextrin night dwell. On admission she presented with normal vital signs, no fever, and abdominal distention with severe epigastric tenderness to palpation without muscular guarding. Her dwell exchange showed blood-tinged cloudy PE. She had hemoglobin of 11.3 g/dl, otherwise normal blood cell counts, and raised amylase (213 UI/l) and lipase (1467 UI/l). There was no elevation of transaminases, cholestatic enzymes, C-reactive protein or procalcitonin and lipidemia or hyperbilirubinemia were normal. PE cell count showed 213/μl leukocytes and 202/μl erythrocytes. Abdominal ultrasound showed no evidence of an obstructive cause. She was admitted in the surgical care unit for a conservative and watchful approach. Results On presentation we accounted for the peritonitis still under treatment, acute pancreatitis, drug therapy and recently introduced icodextrin solution. The acute alithiasic pancreatitis diagnosis was established but there was still a possible causative role of icodextrin or infection and refractory peritonitis could also not be promptly excluded. The literature suggests icodextrin and other drugs as causes for acute pancreatitis in some patients but also mentions the possibility of cloudy or hemorrhagic effluent due to abdominal inflammation processes. Considering the clinical stability, the multiple possible contributing causative agents and the differential diagnosis of refractory peritonitis we closely monitored PE cell count evolution keeping the icodextrin dwell and ceftazidime prescriptions and collected samples for bacterial and fungal culture. The cultures were negative and stability of leukocyte count and mononuclear cell predominance (Fig. 1) helped us exclude the peritonitis hypothesis and attribute the PE changes to the pancreatitis process. Conclusion Inpatient monitoring and identifying all possible causes are essential to ensure good outcomes in PD patients suffering from acute pancreatitis. Full anamnesis, physical examination and close attention to laboratory findings were key in allowing adequate antibiotic therapy and resolution of the abdominal inflammatory process at hand while maintaining an adequate PD prescription.

PET Testing has Utility in the Prescription of Peritoneal Dialysis: CON.

PET Testing has Utility in the Prescription of Peritoneal Dialysis: CON.

418 Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) Prescription Patterns in a Large Dialysis Organization

418 Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) Prescription Patterns in a Large Dialysis Organization

Guía clínica de adecuación y prescripción de la diálisis peritoneal

In recent years, the meaning of adequacy in peritoneal dialysis has changed. We have witnessed a transition from an exclusive achievement of specific objectives —namely solute clearances and ultrafiltration— to a more holistic approach more focused to on the quality of life of these patients. The purpose of this document is to provide recommendations, updated and oriented to social and health environment, for the adequacy and prescription of peritoneal dialysis. The document has been divided into three main sections: adequacy, residual kidney function and prescription of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis. Recently, a guide on the same topic has been published by a Committee of Experts of the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD 2020). In consideration of the contributions of the group of experts and the quasi-simultaneity of the two projects, references are made to this guide in the relevant sections. We have used a systematic methodology (GRADE), which specifies the level of evidence and the strength of the proposed suggestions and recommendations, facilitating future updates of the document.

Peritoneal Protein Loss With Time in Peritoneal Dialysis.

Longitudinal evolution of peritoneal protein loss (PPL), a reflection of hydrostatic pressure-driven leak of plasma proteins through the large-pore pathway, is not clear. Time on PD causes loss of mesothelial cells, vasculopathy, and increased thickness of the submesothelial fibrous layer. Are these structural changes associated with progressive increase of PPL, in a parallel with the rise in the D/P creatinine? The aim of the present study was to identify longitudinal changes of PPL over time. This single-center, longitudinal study included 52 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with a median follow-up of 26.5 months, evaluated at two different time points with a minimum interval of 6 months. Repeated measures analysis was performed using paired sample t-test or the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on the distribution. After a median interval of 15.5 months, lower levels of residual renal function and urine volume, lower Kt/V, and creatinine clearance were found. D/P creatinine and PPL were stable, but a decrease in ultrafiltration was present. Systemic inflammation, nutrition, and volume overload showed no significant change with time on PD. Analysis of a subpopulation with over 48 months between initial and subsequential assessment (n = 11) showed again no difference in inflammation, nutritional and hydration parameters from baseline, but importantly PPL decreased after more than 4 years on PD (mean difference 1.2 g/24, p = 0.033). D/P creatinine and dip of sodium remained unchanged. The absence of deleterious effects of time on PD is reassuring, pointing to the benefit of updated PD prescription, including the standard use of more biocompatible solutions towards membrane preservation and adjusted prescription avoiding overhydration and inflammation while maintaining nutritional status. After controlling for confounders, PPL may act as a biomarker of acquired venous vasculopathy, even if small pore fluid transport rates and free water transport are preserved.

Trends in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Prescriptions in a Large Dialysis Organization in the United States.

Changes in health care policies and recognition of patient benefit have contributed to increases in home-based dialysis, including peritoneal dialysis (PD). Frequent monitoring and early individualization of PD prescriptions are key prerequisites for the delivery of high-quality PD. The present analysis aimed to assess variations in PD prescriptions among incident automated PD (APD) patients who remain on PD for 120+ days. This retrospective analysis examined data from patients within a large dialysis organization that initiated PD with APD between 2015 and 2019. PD prescription data was described by calendar year, timing of PD, and residual renal function categories. Changes in prescriptions from PD initiation (day 1) to day 120 were assessed descriptively. The cohort included 11,659 patients. The mean age at PD initiation increased from 2015 (56 (15) years) through 2019 (58 (15) years), whereas most other variables demonstrated no clear temporal change. Most patients (86%) had nighttime PD prescribed, with an average of 4.9 (1.3) cycles per day, a mean total treatment volume of 9.3 (2.5) L, and a median daily total dwell time of 7 (6,9.5) hours. Relative to day 1 nighttime prescriptions, there were 1) small increases in the proportion of patients receiving 3 or fewer cycles per day and those receiving 6+ cycles per day, 2) a 100 ml mean increase in fill volume per exchange, and 3) a mean 0.5 L increase in total nighttime treatment volume at day 120. When changes in nighttime APD prescriptions were examined at the patient level, 49% of patients had day 120 prescriptions that were unchanged from their initial prescription. In the largest analysis of incident APD prescriptions conducted in the United States to date, the vast majority of patients were prescribed nocturnal PD only with limited variability across the first 4 months of therapy.

Predicting solute transfer rate in patients initiating peritoneal dialysis.

While assessment of membrane characteristics is fundamental to peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription in patients initiating therapy, peritoneal equilibration test has theoretical and practical drawbacks. We wished to determine whether an equation using simple clinical variables could predict fast (above population mean) peritoneal solute transfer rate without dialysate sampling. We measured peritoneal solute transfer rate, as determined by peritoneal equilibration test using the 4-h dialysate to plasma creatinine ratio, in consecutive PD outpatients attending a single tertiary hospital for their first clinical follow-up within 3months of dialysis initiation. An equation estimating peritoneal solute transfer rate based on readily available clinical variables was generated in a randomly selected modeling group and tested in a distinct validation group. We included 712 patients, with 562 in the modeling group and 150 in the validation group. Mean age was 58.4 ± 15.9 with 431 (60.5%) men. Mean peritoneal solute transfer rate value was 0.73 ± 0.13. An equation based on gender, race, serum sodium and albumin yielded a receiving operator characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) to detect fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (> 0.73) of 0.74 (0.67-0.82). Estimated peritoneal solute transfer rate values based on percentiles 15th (> 0.66), 20th (> 0.68), 25th (> 0.69) and 30th (> 0.70) could rule out fast peritoneal solute transfer rate with negative predictive values of 100%, 93.5%, 84.2% and 80.0%, respectively. An equation based on simple clinical variables allows ruling out fast transport in a significant proportion of patients initiating PD with a high degree of confidence without requiring dialysate sampling. This could prove useful in guiding dialysis prescription of PD patients in daily clinical practice, particularly in low-resource settings.

Peritoneal Dialysis Care for People with Diabetes, Polycystic Kidney Disease, or Advanced Liver Disease.

People treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) often have complicating conditions that require careful management. Three such conditions are reviewed in this article-diabetes mellitus, polycystic kidney disease, and chronic liver disease. Each of these conditions requires an understanding of both its effect on the delivery of the PD and the effect of the PD on the condition itself. In diabetes, glucose absorption from the dialysate complicates metabolic control and affects salt and water management and patient outcome. There is particular benefit in clinical care being delivered through a multidisciplinary team that involves both kidney and diabetes experts. In relation to polycystic kidney disease, a key issue is the potential for increased intraperitoneal pressure due to the combined effect of the enlarged polycystic organs and the presence of the dialysis solution, and therefore, the PD prescription requires to be managed with a particular focus on limiting that pressure. For patients with liver disease, key issues include nutritional support because PD can add to protein losses already consequent on the liver disease itself. Considered approaches are required to manage ascites and reduce infection risk and the potential for hernias and leaks to develop. Mortality in this group is unfortunately high-however, PD may present a better management option than hemodialysis in many patients-particularly in those where the liver disease is complicated by low BP, clotting abnormalities, or troublesome ascites. Overall, the choice to use PD in patients with these complicating conditions should be based on shared decision making with the patient and their family members informed by high-quality information in which risks, benefits, and management strategies are clearly presented.

The Beauty of Individualize Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription by Using Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis during Ramadan Fasting

The Beauty of Individualize Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription by Using Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis during Ramadan Fasting

Relationship between number of daily exchanges at CAPD start with clinical outcomes.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) continues to be demanding for patients affected by kidney failure. In kidney failure patients with residual kidney function, the employment of incremental PD, a less onerous dialytic prescription, could translate into a decrease burden on both health systems and patients. Between 1st January 2009 and 31st December 2021, 182 patients who started continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) at our institution were included in the study. The CAPD population was divided into three groups according to the initial number of daily CAPD exchanges prescribed: one or two (50 patients, CAPD-1/2 group), three (97 patients, CAPD-3 group) and four (35 patients, CAPD-4 group), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a difference in term of peritonitis free survival in CAPD-1/2 in comparison to CAPD-3 (hazard ratio (HR): 2.20, p = 0.014) and CAPD-4 (HR: 2.98, p < 0.01). A tendency towards a lower hospitalisation rate (CAPD-3 and CAPD-4 vs. CAPD-1/2, p = 0.11 and 0.13, respectively) and decreased mortality (CAPD-3 and CAPD-4 vs. CAPD-1/2, p = 0.13 and 0.22, respectively) in patients who started PD with less than three daily exchanges was detected. No discrepancy of the difference of the mean values between baseline and 24 months residual kidney function was observed among the three groups (p = 0.33). One- or two-exchange CAPD start was associated with a lower risk of peritonitis in comparison to three- or four-exchange start. Furthermore, an initial PD prescription with less than three exchanges may be associated with an advantage in term of hospitalisation rate and patient survival.

Use of incremental peritoneal dialysis: impact on clinical outcomes and quality of life measure.

Incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD)can be defined as a PD prescription that is less than the standard, full dose prescription and is typically used for patients initiating PD with residual kidney function. It has been suggested that use of incremental peritoneal dialysis may help preserve residual kidney function and may offer better quality of life due to the lower treatment burden, however published evidence is limited. In this study we assessed the associations between incremental peritoneal dialysis use and both clinical outcomes and quality of life measures in a large cohort of incident peritoneal dialysis patients in the US. We considered adult patients initiating peritoneal dialysis between 31 July, 2015 and 31 May, 2019 within a single dialysis organization. Patients with body weight < 40kg, amputation, or an estimated glomerular filtration rate > 20mL/min during the first 4weeks on peritoneal dialysis were excluded. Patients were assigned to exposure groups based on peritoneal dialysis prescription during dialysis weeks 5-8. Incremental peritoneal dialysis was defined by treatment frequency, number of exchanges/day, and exchange volume (for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients) or by treatment frequency and presence/absence of last fill (for automated peritoneal dialysis patients). Analyses were performed separately for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis. For each analysis, incremental peritoneal dialysis patients were propensity score matched to eligible full-dose peritoneal dialysis patients. Patients were followed for a maximum of 12months until censoring for loss to follow-up or study end. Outcomes were compared using Poisson models (mortality, hospitalization, peritoneal dialysis discontinuation), linear mixed models (estimated glomerular filtration rate), and paired t tests (KDQOL domain scores). Among continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients, compared to full-doseperitoneal dialysis, incremental peritoneal dialysis use was associated with better KDQOL scores on 3 domains: physical composite score (42.5 vs 37.7, p = 0.03), burden of kidney disease (60.2 vs 45.6, p = 0.003), effects of kidney disease (79.4 vs 72.3, p = 0.05). Hospitalization and mortality rates were numerically lower (0.77 vs 1.12 admits/pt-year, p = 0.09 and 5.0 vs 10.2 deaths/100 pt-years, p = 0.22), while no associations were found with estimated glomerular filtration rate or peritoneal dialysis discontinuation rate. Use of incremental peritoneal dialysis was not associated with any discernable effects on outcomes in automated peritoneal dialysis patients. These results suggest that there may be benefits of using incremental PD in the context of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, particularly with respect to quality of life as a prescription strategy when initiating peritoneal dialysis. While no significant benefits of incremental peritoneal dialysis were detected among patients initiating automated peritoneal dialysis, no detrimental effects of using incremental schedules were observed for either peritoneal dialysis type.

Evaluation of peritoneal dialysis prescriptions in uremic rats.

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) require dialysis or transplantation for their survival. There are few experimental animal models mimicking the human situation in which the animals are dependent on dialysis for their survival. We developed a peritoneal dialysis (PD) system for rats to enable long-term treatment under controlled conditions. Rats were chemically nephrectomised using orellanine to render them uremic. Two studies were performed, the first with highly uremic rats on PD for 5 days, and the other with moderately uremic rats on PD for 21 days. Blood and dialysate samples were collected repeatedly from the first study and solute concentrations analysed. Based on these values, dialysis parameters were calculated together with generation rates allowing for kinetic modelling of the effects of PD. In the second study, the general conditions of the rats were evaluated during a longer dialysis period. For rats with estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 5-10% of normal (moderately uremic rats), five daily PD cycles kept the rats in good condition for 3 weeks. For highly uremic rats (GFR below 3% of normal), more extensive dialysis is needed to maintain homeostasis and our simulations show that a six daily and four nightly PD cycles should be needed to keep the rats in good condition. In conclusion, the PD system described in this study can be used for long-term studies of PD on uremic dialysis-dependent rats mimicking the human setting. To maintain whole body homeostasis of highly uremic rats, intense PD is needed during both day and night.

The Removal of Uremic Solutes by Peritoneal Dialysis.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is now commonly prescribed to achieve target clearances for urea or creatinine. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis has proposed however that such targets should no longer be imposed. The Society's new guidelines suggest rather that the PD prescription should be adjusted to achieve well-being in individual patients. The relaxation of treatment targets could allow increased use of PD. Measurement of solute levels in patients receiving dialysis individualized to relieve uremic symptoms could also help us identify the solutes responsible for those symptoms and then devise new means to limit their accumulation. This possibility has prompted us to review the extent to which different uremic solutes are removed by PD.

Phosphate Control in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Issues, Solutions, and Open Questions.

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in advanced chronic kidney disease and contributes to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The present narrative review focuses on the management of phosphatemia in uremic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. These patients frequently develop hyperphosphatemia since phosphate anion behaves as a middle-size molecule despite its low molecular weight. Accordingly, patient transporter characteristics and peritoneal dialysis modalities and prescriptions remarkably influence serum phosphate control. Given that phosphate peritoneal removal is often insufficient, especially in lower transporters, patients are often prescribed phosphate binders whose use in peritoneal dialysis is primarily based on clinical trials conducted in hemodialysis because very few studies have been performed solely in peritoneal dialysis populations. A crucial role in phosphate control among peritoneal dialysis patients is played by diet, which must help in reducing phosphorous intake while preventing malnutrition. Moreover, residual renal function, which is preserved in most peritoneal dialysis patients, significantly contributes to maintaining phosphate balance. The inadequate serum phosphate control observed in many patients on peritoneal dialysis highlights the need for large and well-designed clinical trials including exclusively peritoneal dialysis patients to evaluate the effects of a multiple therapeutic approach on serum phosphate control and on hard clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

Association of Incremental peritoneal dialysis with residual kidney function decline in patients on peritoneal dialysis: The balANZ trial.

Incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD), defined as less than Full-dose PD prescription, has several possible merits, including better preservation of residual kidney function (RKF), lower peritoneal glucose exposure and reduced risk of peritonitis. The aims of this study were to analyse the association of Incremental and Full-dose PD strategy with RKF and urine volume (UV) decline in patients commencing PD. Incident PD patients who participated in the balANZ randomised controlled trial (RCT) (2004-2010) and had at least one post-baseline RKF and UV measurement was included in this study. Patients receiving <56 L/week and ≥56 L/week of PD fluid at PD commencement were classified as Incremental and Full-dose PD, respectively. An alternative cut-point of 42 L/week was used in a sensitivity analysis. The primary and secondary outcomes were changes in measured RKF and daily UV, respectively. The study included 154 patients (mean age 57.9 ± 14.1 years, 44% female, 34% diabetic, mean follow-up 19.5 ± 6.6 months). Incremental and Full-dose PD was commenced by 45 (29.2%) and 109 (70.8%) participants, respectively. RKF declined in the Incremental group from 7.9 ± 3.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline to 3.2 ± 2.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 24 months (p < 0.001), and in the Full-dose PD group from 7.3 ± 2.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline to 3.4 ± 2.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 24 months (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the slope of RKF decline between Incremental and Full-dose PD (p = 0.78). UV declined from 1.81 ± 0.73 L/day at baseline to 0.64 ± 0.63 L/day at 24 months in the Incremental PD group (p < 0.001) and from 1.38 ± 0.61 L/day to 0.71 ± 0.46 L/day in the Full-dose PD group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the slope of UV decline between Incremental and Full-dose PD (p = 0.18). Compared with Full-dose PD start, Incremental PD start is associated with similar declines in RKF and UV.

Questioning one-size-fits-all dialysis prescription: balancing dialysis prescription and residual kidney function

Recent awareness of the viability and benefits of incremental hemodialysis is an opportunity to review clinical practices and improve the process of dialysis induction. Incremental dialysis is a standard approach in peritoneal dialysis prescription, with a focus on the quality parameter of nephroprotection. The same should apply in hemodialysis, with individualization of the prescribed extracorporeal technique: frequency, duration and intensity, in either home or center hemodialysis, are prescription variables to adjust according to the patient’s residual renal function, medical condition and psycho-social priorities. Considering that fluid balance and smooth ultrafiltration critically impact patient survival, incremental dialysis schedules need to be carefully tailored and grounded in routine residual kidney function measurement. This paper raises concerns about both the benefits of incremental dialysis and its putative detrimental effects, these being mainly dependent on the quality of the hemodialysis prescription and external economic constraints. As a comparator, incremental peritoneal dialysis is a scientifically based model to pursue, whichever the modality, based on updated concepts of patient-centered prescription and adequacy in dialytic renal replacement therapies.

Tidal continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis in children

About 10% of all home peritoneal dialysis regimens in children with chronic kidney disease stage 5 are reported to involve some form of a tidal peritoneal dialysis (TPD) prescription. Despite this, there remain several gaps in how pediatric nephrologists approach the use of TPD. This stems from a combination of factors such as the confusing technical terminology pertaining to TPD, seemingly conflicting data on the risks, benefits, and indications for TPD, and lastly, limited published guidelines on the practical aspects of how to write a TPD prescription, based on the indication, in children. Our educational review, using evidence-based data, attempts to bridge this gap and provide an easy-to-use guide on the key practical aspects of TPD in children.

Moderate hyperosmolar hyponatremia caused by excessive off-label use of icodextrin during peritoneal dialysis

Icodextrin use during the long dwell of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimen is commonly used to increase ultrafiltration. Its use may cause a mild and clinically insignificant degree of hyponatremia. We describe a patient who was admitted twice to our medical center on an atypical continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) regimen utilizing solely icodextrin with 2 exchanges (12-hour dwells). On both admissions, he had hyperosmolar hyponatremia in the 120-mmol/L range with a large osmolal gap. After icodextrin was stopped and his PD prescription was switched to dextrose solutions, both hyponatremia corrected and the osmolal gap quickly disappeared. The accumulation of osmotically active solute in extracellular fluids results in efflux of water from the cellular compartment and produces both hyponatremia and hypertonicity [1]. This tonic effect occurs most frequently with hyperglycemia, but other substances can also cause this, including mannitol, sorbitol, glycine, and maltose [1, 2]. In this report, we present a patient with end-stage renal disease (ERSD) on an atypical off-label PD regimen utilizing solely icodextrin solutions who developed hyperosmolar hyponatremia in the 120-mmol/L range, with a large osmolal gap. This appeared to be due to absorbed metabolites of icodextrin, mainly maltose.

A Review of Residual Kidney Function in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Residual kidney function (RKF) has been associated with better survival, less morbidity, and improved quality of life in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Since higher peritoneal clearance does not lead to better outcomes, more emphasis should be put on preserving kidney function. Many other benefits have been reported, including better volume and blood pressure control, better nutritional status, lower rates of PD peritonitis, preserved erythropoietin and vitamin D production, middle molecule clearance, lower Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and better serum phosphate level. The most practical method of assessing RKF is the mean of 24-h urinary urea and creatinine clearance. Incremental PD prescription is an ideal option to supplement RKF in PD patients, which also offers more flexibility to the patient and, possibly, improved adherence. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers should be used when possible in PD patients to preserve RKF. Loop diuretics are underutilized in PD patients despite providing an additional means of maintaining fluid balance and reducing the need for higher glucose-containing PD solutions. In this paper, we outline the importance of RKF in PD patients and the different strategies for its preservation.