Rate Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Research Articles

Increasing Utilization of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty from 2010 to 2022

Extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been shown to reduce rates of periprosthetic joint infection in high-risk patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although national societies' recommendations against their use and clinical efficacy remain controversial, the increase in the literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns that may warrant the creation of national guidelines. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in the utilization of EOA prophylaxis following TKA from 2010 to2022. Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision TKA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Temporal trends in EOA usage following primary or revision TKA were calculated, and secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered at high risk for infection. In total, 1,258,759 primary and 91,530 aseptic revision TKA patients were included in this study. From 2010 to 2022, EOA prescriptions increased by 321 and 368% following primary and revision TKA, respectively. Rates of utilization among high-risk individuals were similar to those of the general population. The use of EOA prophylaxis after TKA has increased significantly since 2010. Given their increasing usage and variation in prescription patterns among patients at high risk of infection, guidelines surrounding their use are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of infection.

The Use of a Novel Surgical Irrigant May Be Associated with Decreased Incidence of Surgical Site Infections

Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a formidable challenge to patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This investigation evaluated a novel antimicrobial surgical irrigation solution, XPerience (XP) (Next Science LLC, Jacksonville, FL), with proven high & persistent in-vivo efficacy against planktonic bacteria and biofilm. The primary objective of this investigation was to compare the incidence of PJI following TKA performed with use of XP versus a standard control rinse (povidone-iodine). The secondary outcome was an all-cause return to operating room (OR) rate. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 824 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA/TKA from 12/1/2019 - 11/30/2021 treated using povidone-iodine solution and 471 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA/TKA from 12/1/2021 - 12/30/2022 treated with XP at a single institution by the senior author. All surgeries in both groups followed largely identical preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative protocols. A total of 1,295 cases were analyzed. The groups shared largely analogous background characteristics pertaining to age, sex, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Results The overall SSI rate was 0% (0/471) in the XP group and 0.49% (4/824) in the control group (P = 0.3). The overall return to OR rate was 0.21% (1/471) in the XP group and 0.85% (7/824) in the control group (P = 0.3). Control group cases returned to the OR for hematoma debridements, periprosthetic fracture fixation, and PJI revisions. Conclusion This investigation is the first to remark on the clinical efficacy of a novel surgical irrigant. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of PJI or return to OR with the irrigant versus without, though a trend towards lower rates was observed in the context of a low baseline infection rate. Limitations pertaining to a single-center experience and sample size may be addressed by further studies incorporating broader enrollments.

Arthroscopy Within Three Months Prior to Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With an Increased Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundArthroscopy remains a commonly performed procedure in patients who have meniscal or other osteochondral pathology prior to ultimately being indicated for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to examine the timing of knee arthroscopy prior to UKA and its association with 2-year periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates and medical and surgical complications. MethodsPatients undergoing UKA who had history of ipsilateral arthroscopy within 2 years prior to the UKA were identified in a national insurance database. A control cohort of propensity matched patients who did not have a history of arthroscopy was identified. Study cohorts were established based on timing of the arthroscopic procedure: 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to12, and 12 to 24 months prior to UKA. Patients were included if they had 2-year postoperative follow-up after UKA. The 90-day rates of postoperative medical and 2-year surgical complications were recorded. Multivariate analysis was conducted to account for confounding variables and covariates. ResultsA final cohort of 3,471 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients undergoing UKA within three months of the arthroscopic procedure demonstrated a higher incidence of PJI when compared to the control cohort (3.30 versus 1.12%, P = 0.012). In addition, there was an increased rate of periprosthetic fracture observed in those undergoing UKA within three months of arthroscopy when compared to the control (1.10 versus 0.20%, P = 0.010). ConclusionsPatients undergoing ipsilateral arthroscopy within three months of a UKA demonstrated a nearly 3-fold increased incidence of PJI when compared to the control. There was no increased incidence of PJI when UKA was staged greater than three months after arthroscopy. These findings provide insight for preoperative considerations for arthroplasty surgeons in this patient population. Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.

Prevalence of unexpected intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Prevalence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is reported to be 8.32% with largely varying findings in individual studies (5.92-62.07%) due to a heterogeneity in preoperative diagnostic work-up and diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). When diagnosed as unsuspected PJI, re-revision rate is reported to be as high as 18.45% compared to 2.94% in patients with UPIC classified as contamination (p = 0.0237). We performed a monocentric retrospective analysis of revision TKA surgery to determine prevalence of UPIC, risk of developing a subsequent PJI and re-revision rate after 24 months compared to those without UPIC. All presumed aseptic total knee revision procedures from 2008 until 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Single stage femorotibial revisions of TKA with at least 3 intraoperative cultures and a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included, whereas partial revisions or revisions from unicompartimental knee prosthesis to TKA were excluded. Demographic data were collected as well as initial reason for revision, preoperative aspiration results, micro-organism identified and postoperative antibiotics' administration. Primary outcome was survival rate after 24 months with differentiation based on UPIC interpretation: sterile, contamination, unsuspected PJI. Of 256 included cases, 75 (29.3%) were found to have at least 1 UPIC during revision surgery, 72% of whom a single UPIC was found. Thirty-four cases (13.28%) were interpreted as unsuspected PJI and therefore treated with antibiotics. In total, 13 of the 256 patients (5.08%) had to be re-revised during follow-up with 7 PJI (2.73%), none of them developing reinfection defined as PJI with the same microorganism. A statistically significant trend towards earlier failure in the unsuspected PJI group compared to the contaminant group was not observed. However, a higher incidence of re-revisions attributed to septic reasons was noted in the former group. Presence of UPIC in presumed aseptic revision TKA does not correlate with a lower survival rate, but a higher incidence of subsequent PJI was observed in cases interpreted as unsuspected PJI.

Perioperative Glycemic Variability Influences Infection Rates Differently Following Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundRecent investigations have determined that abnormal postoperative glycemia following primary total joint arthroplasty is associated with adverse events. Our study aimed to determine if hyperglycemia and glycemic variability following aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty were associated with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within two years postoperatively. MethodsA retrospective review was performed of 2,208 patients within a single institution undergoing aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty from 2012 to 2019. Postoperative glucose values were recorded. Glycemic variability was measured via three parameters: coefficient of variation, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, and J-index. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations with PJI at 90-day, 1-, and 2-year follow-up. ResultsIn revision hips, all glycemic measures were not associated with PJI at any time point in logistic regression analyses, except for the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, which predicted PJI at one year (P = 0.045); body mass index was the only factor associated with PJI at all timepoints in all models. In revision knees, all glycemic measures were not associated with PJI at any timepoint in logistic regression analyses; however, PJI rates differed between diabetics and nondiabetics at all time points (P < 0.05). ConclusionsOur findings illustrate that decreasing preoperative body mass index and postoperative glycemic variability may be critical in reducing PJI rates in revision hips. Furthermore, patients who have diabetes should be counseled that they remain at higher risk of PJI regardless of perioperative glucose control after revision knee surgery.

Intraosseous regional antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA): Systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundA major catastrophic adverse event after total joint arthroplasty surgery (TJA) is the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). In the recent years, regional antibiotic prophylaxis has gained momentum as a novel infection control strategy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with different purported benefits over systemic administration. The current article was planned to comprehensively review the available evidence in literature; as well as compare the safety and effectiveness of intraosseous (IO) antibiotic prophylaxis with systemic prophylaxis in patients undergoing TJA. MethodsAn independent database (5 databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane library) search was performed (on January 1, 2024) using suitable key words [PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023458219)]. All randomised controlled trials (RCT), prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on intraosseous vancomycin or other antibiotics during arthroplasty for prophylaxis of PJI were considered. Studies not pertaining to the topic of interest or non-clinical trials were excluded. The evaluated outcome parameters included PJI incidence, systemic antibiotic levels, minimal inhibitory concentrations, local antibiotic concentrations achieved in soft tissues (or fat) and bone; and associated complications. While the “risk of bias” was evaluated using ROB-2 tool and MINORS criteria; LibreOffice version (v)7.5.6 was utilized for data management. OpenMeta-analyst v5.26.14 and RevMan v5.4 software were employed for meta-analysis. ResultsFollowing our literature search, 11 studies (1 prospective series, 6 RCT and 4 retrospective studies) were finally identified. Based on our meta-analysis, there was statistically higher antibiotic concentration in the bone [meandifference(MD):25.12 μg/g;95%CI:10.32,39.91;z=3.33,p = 0.0009] and local fat tissues [MD:22.01 μg/g;95%CI:1.71,32.30;z=4.19,p < 0.0001) following IO prophylaxis, as compared with the systemic drug administration. IO prophylaxis was also associated with a significant reduction in prosthetic joint infections (PJI; April 1633 and 25/2213 patients developed PJI in IO and systemic prophylaxis groups, respectively; p = 0.006). There was significant difference in gram-positive infections between IO and systemic prophylaxis groups (2/1123 and 13/1753 g + ve infections in IO and systemic prophylaxis groups, respectively; p = 0.05). Our review and meta-analysis revealed no substantial difference in complications amongst the groups (p = 0.66). ConclusionIO antibiotic prophylaxis appears to be an effective and safe strategy in patients undergoing TJA. IO access provides substantially enhanced antibiotic elution into the local tissues (bone and soft tissues); and consequently, results in reduced of PJI rates after TJA (in comparison with conventional systemic antibiotic prophylaxis).

Asymptomatic Elevated Inflammatory Markers: Is There a Risk for Infection or Revision in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the treatment of choice for advanced knee osteoarthritis. Long-term studies report high patient satisfaction, while complications such as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be devastating. Knowledge regarding risk factors for PJI is critical to minimize and ideally avoid complications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of PJI and revision in patients who had preoperative asymptomatic high C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels in primary TKAs. MethodsPatients undergoing primary TKA between 2010 and 2022 were eligible. Inclusion criteria were patients who had preoperative complete biochemical parameters and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients who died during the first year, and those who had a history of inflammatory arthritis, autoimmune disease, renal pathologies or septic arthritis, were excluded. Patients who had elevated blood CRP and ESR levels taken within 48 hours before surgery underwent a thorough medical examination with a focus on infection symptoms. After screening and consultation, residual elevated CRP and ESR levels were classified as asymptomatic. After exclusions, 1,528 patients were included. The mean age was 66 years (range, 35 to 92) and the mean follow-up time was 6.4 years (range, 1.6 to 12.3). ResultsThe rate of revision within one year after surgery was 1.6%, whereas the rate of revision in the first five years was 3.8%. The PJI rates for the 1st and 5th postoperative years were 1.7 and 2.9% respectively. Regression analysis did not show any of the potential variables to be a risk factor for revision or PJI. ConclusionAsymptomatic elevated acute-phase reactants are not a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection or aseptic revision. At a mean follow-up of 6.4 years, overall survival was 96.7%, with only 2.2% of patients revised due to a PJI.

Nontobacco Nicotine Dependence and Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Other Postoperative Complications in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis.

Nontobacco nicotine products, including e-cigarettes and vaping, are marketed as healthier alternatives to tobacco. However, the literature on nontobacco nicotine dependence (NTND) is scarce. It is important to analyze the influence of these products as they pertain to medical and surgical postoperative complications. This study hypothesizes that patients with NTND will experience more postoperative complications. Using the TriNetX database, which aggregates deidentified medical records from 89 healthcare organizations in the Research Network, Current Procedural Terminology and 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases codes were used to identify patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty (SA) from January 2012 to February 2024. Patients were divided into cohorts based on their NTND status before surgery. 90-day major medical complications and 2-year implant-related complications were assessed. Statistical analyses involved calculating risk ratios for postoperative complications. This study analyzed a total of 89,910 SA patients, of which 6,756 were 1:1 propensity matched into NTND or control cohorts. Within the 90-day postoperative period, the NTND cohort exhibited significantly higher rates of sepsis (1.80 vs. 1.20, P = 0.012), surgical site infection (1.20 vs. 0.70%, P = 0.007), and wound disruptions (0.70 vs. 0.40%, P = 0.048), average opioids prescribed (4.46 vs. 3.338, P < 0.001), readmission (10.20% vs. 6.20%, P 0.001) compared with the non-NTND cohort. At the 2-year follow-up, mechanical loosening was notably higher in the NTND group (1.10 vs. 0.30%, P 0.001), as were rates of prosthetic joint infections (2.20 vs. 1.20%, P 0.001). No significant difference was observed for revision rates (3.20% vs. 2.90%, P = 0.269). NTND is associated with higher 90-day rates of wound distruptions, infections, sepsis, as well as increased rates of mechanical loosening and prosthetic joint infection at 2 years postoperatively after SA. These results highlight the need for comprehensive NTND preoperative screening and tailored patient counseling in this patient population.

Low UKA implantation volume, comorbidities, male sex, and implantation of constrained TKA are risk factors for septic revision after knee arthroplasty implantation : A register-based study from the German Arthroplasty Register

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the main causes of revision surgeries after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicondylar knee replacement. Patient- and hospital-related risk factors must be evaluated to prevent PJI. This study identifies influencing factors and differences in infection rates between various types of implant. The basis for the data is the German Arthroplasty Register (EPRD). Septic revisions were calculated with the aid of Kaplan-Meier estimates, with septic revision surgery defined as the primary endpoint. Patients with constrained and unconstrained TKA or UKA were analysed using the Holm multiple log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model. The 300,998 cases of knee arthroplasty analysed included 254,144 (84.4%) unconstrained TKA, 9993 (3.3%) constrained TKA and 36,861 (12.3%) UKA, with a maximum follow-up of 7 years. After 1 year, the PJI rate was 0.5% for UKA and 2.8% for TKA, whereas after 7 years it was 4.5% for UKA and 0.9% for TKA (p < 0.0001). In constrained TKA, the PJI rate was significantly increased compared with unconstrained TKA (p < 0.0001). After 1 year, the PJI rate was 2.0% for constrained TKA and 0.8% for unconstrained TKA, as well as 3.1% and 1.4% respectively after 7 years. Implantation of a constrained TKA (HR = 2.55), male sex (HR = 1.84), an increased Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score (HR = 1.18-1.56) and an implantation volume of less than 25 UKA per year (HR = 2.15) were identified as risk factors for revision surgeries; an Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score of0 (HR = 0.80) was identified as a preventive factor. A reduced implantation volume and constrained knee arthroplasty are linked to a higher risk of PJI. Comorbidities (increased Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score), male sex and a low UKA-implantation volume were identified as risk factors for PJI. Patients who fulfil these criteria need specific infection prevention measures. Further analyses are required to investigate the potential influence of prevention and risk factor modification. III.

Learning curve comparison between switching approach and switching implant in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty

IntroductionImplementing new approaches or new implants is always related with a certain learning curve in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently, many surgeons are switching to minimally invasive approaches combined with short stems for performing THA. Therefore, we aimed to asses and compare the learning curve of switching from an anterolateral Watson Jones approach (ALA) to a direct anterior approach (DAA) with the learning curve of switching from a neck-resecting to a partially neck-sparing short stem in cementless THA.Materials and methodsThe first 150 consecutive THA performed through a DAA (Group A) and the first 150 consecutive THA using a partially neck-sparing short stem (Group B) performed by a single surgeon were evaluated within this retrospective cohort study. All cases were screened for surgery related adverse events (AE). Furthermore, the operative time of each surgery was evaluated and the learning curve assessed performing a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.ResultsOverall, significantly more AE occurred in Group A compared to Group B (18.0% vs. 10.0%; p = 0.046). The sub-analysis of the AE revealed higher rates of periprosthetic joint infections (2.7% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.176), periprosthetic fractures (4.0% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.310) and overall revisions (4.7% vs. 1.3% p = 0.091) within Group A without statistical significance. The CUSUM analysis revealed a consistent reduction of operative time after 97 cases in Group A and 79 cases in Group B.ConclusionA significantly higher overall rate of AE was detected while switching approach compared to switching implant for performing THA. However, according to the results of this study, surgeons should be aware of the learning curve of the adoption to a new implant with different fixation philosophy as well.

Assessment of the Potential Role of Preoperative Dental Clearance in Total Joint Arthroplasty Optimization: A Pilot Study.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. This pilot study primarily aimed to investigate if preoperative dental screenings would impact the rate of PJI following TJA when compared to historical controls. Secondarily, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of dental pathology in patients undergoing TJA. Charts from 103 consecutive patients undergoing primary or revision total hip arthroplasty (THA, rTHA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA, rTKA) by a single surgeon at a single academic institution over a two-year period were reviewed and selected for inclusion. All patients were referred to a dentist for preoperative clearance using a standardized form. The rate of dental pathology before surgery, details of the dental intervention required, and any dental work performed within six months postoperatively were evaluated. The demographic and comorbidity composition of our patient population was also collected. Finally, rates of PJI following each type of TJA were obtained for demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical controls from similar study designs to examine the potential impact of preoperative dental intervention. Of the 103 patients, 31 (30.1%) were found to have preoperative dental pathology. Twenty-eight of these 31 patients (90.3%) required dental intervention prior to surgery. Based on demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical data, we expected two (95% CI (0, 6)) PJI cases for the THA group, 0 (95% CI (0, 2)) PJI cases for the TKA group, two (95% CI (0, 5)) PJI cases for the rTHA group, and two (95% CI (0, 5)) PJI cases for the rTKA group. However, in our study, there were no PJIs after any TJA up to the latest follow-up, which was unlikely for THA, rTHA, and rTKA groups given the calculated Poisson probabilities (9.39%, 15.11%, and 11.26%, respectively). Finding 0 cases was likely for the TKA group given the calculated Poisson probability of 72.61%. This pilot study demonstrated that preoperative dental screening, which aims to decrease the chance of PJI due to bacteremia, may have an impact on the rate of PJI following THA, rTKA, and rTHA but not TKA based on Poisson probabilities calculated from demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical controls that lacked preoperative dental screening. For THA, rTKA, and rTHA, the Poisson probabilities of observing 0 cases of PJI postoperatively, as was the case in our study, were unlikely, suggesting that some variable in our cohort was decreasing the PJI rate for these groups. However, in the case of TKA, the Poisson probability of observing 0 cases was likely and matched the results of our study, suggesting that no variable in our cohort was affecting the PJI rate for this group. We cannot draw direct conclusions from this retrospective observational study, but the preliminary findings prompt further investigation through an appropriately controlled, blinded, multi-centered, and powered prospective randomized controlled trial.

Mid-Term to Long-Term Outcomes and Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundSevere forms of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in adulthood often lead to total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term to long-term outcomes of THA in Crowe type IV DDH cases, which represent a technically challenging and complex patient group. MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for observational studies and case series with over 100 months of mean follow-up on adult patients who had Crowe type IV DDH treated with THA. A total of 3,710 records were initially identified, leading to the inclusion of 24 studies in the final analysis. These studies were subjected to quality assessment using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment tool. Various outcomes including revision rates, leg-length discrepancy, Harris Hip Score, and complications like periprosthetic joint infections, dislocations, and nerve injuries were analyzed. A random effects model was employed for statistical analysis, with sensitivity analysis and metaregression applied in cases of high heterogeneity. ResultsThe included studies assessed 1,024 hips with a mean follow-up of 11 years, revealing improvements in Harris Hip Score and reductions in leg length discrepancy post-THA. However, notable challenges were noted, including a 10.7% rate of intraoperative fractures, a 1.8% periprosthetic joint infection rate, and a 5.8% dislocation rate. Osteolysis and aseptic loosening revisions were observed in 9.1 and 8% of cases, respectively. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 11.1% of patients. Nerve injury was reported in 4.2% of cases. With the use of metaregression, some factors for observed heterogeneity were identified. ConclusionsTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) in Crowe type IV DDH patients presents notable challenges, but can lead to substantial long-term improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Level of EvidenceIV.

Postoperative outcomes and trends in computer-navigated and robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

As the volume of technology-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases, there is a need to characterise the outcomes of robotic-assisted (RA) and computer-navigated (CN) THA. The goal of this study was to assess outcomes and opioid consumption following CN-THA and RA-THA compared to conventionally-instrumented (CON) THA. The Premier Database was queried for all patients who underwent primary, elective THA from 2015-2020. Patients were divided into 3 groups: CN, RA, or CON-THA. Yearly usage trends were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the 90-day risk of postoperative complications. Opioid consumption was reported in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for postoperative days (POD) 0 and 1. Overall, 474,707 elective THAs were identified (95.7% CON, 2.1% CN, 2.2% RA. After accounting for confounders, CN-THA patients were at decreased risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (aOR: 0.55, p < 0.001) and dislocation (aOR 0.45, p < 0.001), but increased risk for blood transfusion (aOR 1.97, <0.001) compared to CON-THA. RA-THA patients were at decreased risk of dislocation (aOR:0.66, p < 0.001) but increased risk for transfusion (aOR 1.20, p < 0.001), prosthesis breakage (aOR 3.88, p < 0.001), and periprosthetic fracture (aOR 1.72, p < 0.001). Opioid consumption for CN-THA patients was lower on POD1 and lower for RA-THA patients POD0 and 2 compared to CON-THA. CN-THA was associated with reduced rates of PJI and dislocation, but increased rates of blood transfusion while RA-THA was associated with decreased rates of dislocation, but increased rates of blood transfusion, prosthesis complications, and periprosthetic fracture compared to CON-THA. Technology-assisted THA was associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Cerebral Palsy: A Large Database Analysis.

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a neurodevelopmental condition that can result in altered gait biomechanics, joint dysfunction, and imbalance. The complications associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with CP have not yet been well described. Therefore, our analysis sought to compare the 90-day and 2-year complications following TKA in patients with and without CP. The PearlDiver Mariner database was utilized to identify patients with CP undergoing primary TKA between 2010 and 2020. This cohort was matched 1:4 to a control cohort without neurodegenerative disorders based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), tobacco use, obesity, and diabetes. A total of 3,257 patients (657 CP patients 2,600 controls) were included in our final analysis. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the risk of CP on medical and surgical complications at 90 days and all-cause revision rates at 2 years. Patients with CP had an increased risk of acute kidney injury (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-2.5; p = 0.019), pneumonia (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 3.69-8.67; p < 0.001), urinary tract infection (OR: 5.01; 95% CI: 3.85-6.52; p < 0.001), and transfusion (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.50-3.23; p < 0.001). CP patients additionally had a higher incidence of emergency department (ED) visits (OR: 5.24; 95% CI: 3.76-7.32; p < 0.001) and readmissions (OR: 5.24; 95% CI: 2.57-4.96; p < 0.001). There were no differences in rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.69-2.10; p = 0.463), surgical site infection (SSI; OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.12-1.46; p = 0.463), and reoperation (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 0.71-2.43; p = 0.339) at 90 days postoperatively. The all-cause revision rates at 2 years were comparable (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.67-1.51; p = 0.927). In this database review, we found that CP patients have a higher risk of medical complications in the acute postoperative period following TKA. The 90-day surgical complication and 2-year revision rates in CP patients were comparable to matched controls.

Complicaciones de la administración intraósea de vancomicina en artroplastia total de cadera

IntroductionThe incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in hip surgeries has significantly decreased thanks to intravenous (IV) antibiotic prophylaxis. However, in patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or those at risk of colonization, it is necessary to include vancomycin in the prophylaxis. Intraosseous administration of vancomycin could enhance its effectiveness in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Materials and methodsA retrospective study was conducted between March and December 2023 involving 53 patients scheduled for primary THA with colonization risk factors. The median age of the patients was 67 years (range 61 to 75), and all received treatment with intraosseous vancomycin (500mg). Detailed records and documentation of complications during hospitalization and the first three months post-surgery were maintained. As a secondary outcome measure, the incidence of PJI was explored. ResultsWe administered 500mg of intraosseous vancomycin, injected into the greater trochanter, along with standard IV prophylaxis. The incidence of complications was 1.64%. The PJI rate at 90 days was 0%. ConclusionsIntraosseous administration of low-dose vancomycin in THA for patients at risk of MRSA colonization, combined with standard IV prophylaxis, was shown to be safe and did not present significant adverse effects. Furthermore, this strategy eliminates the logistical challenges associated with timely vancomycin administration.Level of evidence IV: Case Series.

Comparison of the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine irrigation and topical vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine irrigation alone on the periprosthetic joint infection incidence rate in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a protocol for multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial

BackgroundWith the increasing number of joint replacement surgeries, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has become a significant concern in orthopedic practice, making research on PJI prevention paramount. Therefore, the study will aim to compare the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine and topical vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine alone on the PJI incidence rate in patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsThe prospective randomized clinical trial will be conducted in two independent voivodeship hospitals with extensive experience in lower limb arthroplasties. The studied material will comprise 840 patients referred to hospitals for primary THA or TKA. The patients will be randomly allocated to two equal groups, receiving two different interventions during joint replacement. In group I, povidone-iodine irrigation and consecutively topical vancomycin powder will be used before wound closure. In group II, only povidone-iodine lavage irrigation will be used before wound closure. The primary outcome will be the incidence rate of PJI based on the number of patients with PJI occurrence within 90 days after arthroplasty. The occurrence will be determined using a combined approach, including reviewing hospital records for readmissions and follow-up phone interviews with patients. The infection will be diagnosed based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. The chi-square test will be used to compare the infection rates between the two studied groups. Risk and odds ratios for the between-groups comparison purposes will also be estimated. Medical cost analysis will also be performed.DiscussionA randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine irrigation and vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine irrigation alone in preventing PJIs after primary arthroplasty is crucial to advancing knowledge in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes, and guiding evidence-based clinical practices.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05972603. Registered on 2 August 2023.

Low implantation volume, comorbidities, male sexand implantation of constrained TKA identified as risk factors for septic revision in knee arthroplasty:A register-based study from the German Arthroplasty Registry.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major cause of revision surgery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). Patient- and hospital-related risk factors need to be assessed to prevent PJI. This study identifies influential factors and differences in infection rates between different implant types. Data were obtained from the German Arthroplasty Registry. Septic revisions were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates with septic revision surgery as the primary endpoint. Patients with constrained and unconstrained TKA or UKA were analysed using Holm's multiple log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazards ratio. The 300,998 cases of knee arthroplasty analysed included 254,144 (84.4%) unconstrained TKA, 9993 (3.3%) constrained TKA and 36,861 (12.3%) UKA with a maximum follow-up of 7 years. At 1 year, the PJI rate was 0.5% for UKA and 2.8% for TKA, whereas at 7 years, the PJI rate was 4.5% for UKA and 0.9% for TKA (p < 0.0001). The PJI rate significantly increased for constrained TKA compared to unconstrained TKA (p < 0.0001). The PJI rate was 2.0% for constrained TKA and 0.8% for unconstrained TKA at 1 year and 3.1% and 1.4% at 7 years. Implantation of a constrained TKA (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.55), male sex (HR = 1.84), increased Elixhauser score (HR = 1.18-1.56) and implant volume of less than 25 UKA per year (HR = 2.15) were identified as risk factors for revision surgery; an Elixhauser score of 0 (HR = 0.80) was found to be a preventive factor. Reduced implant volume and constrained knee arthroplasty are associated with a higher risk of PJI. Comorbidities (elevated Elixhauser score), male sex and low UKA implant volume have been identified as risk factors for PJI. Patients who meet these criteria require specific measures to prevent infection. Further research is required on the potential impact of prevention and risk factor modification. Level III.

Preoperative Laboratory Values Predicting Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty.

Morbidly obese patients are an ever-growing high-risk population undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for end-stage osteoarthritis. This study sought to identify preoperative laboratory values that may serve as predictors of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in morbidly obese patients undergoing THA or TKA. All morbidly obese patients with preoperative laboratory data before undergoing primary elective TKA or THA were identified using the Premier Healthcare Database. Patients who developed PJI within 90 days after surgery were compared with patients without PJI. Laboratory value thresholds were defined by clinical guidelines or primary literature. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were utilized to assess the association between PJI and preoperative laboratory values, including total lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), albumin level, platelet count, albumin-globulin ratio, hemoglobin level, and hemoglobin A1c. Of the 6,780 patients identified (TKA: 76.67%; THA: 23.33%), 47 (0.69%) developed PJI within 90 days after surgery. The rate of PJI was 1.69% for patients with a hemoglobin level of <12 g/dL (for females) or <13 g/dL (for males), 2.14% for those with a platelet count of <142,000/µL or >417,000/µL, 1.11% for those with an NLR of >3.31, 1.69% for those with a PLR of >182.3, and 1.05% for those with an SII of >776.2. After accounting for potential confounding factors, we observed an association between PJI and an abnormal preoperative NLR (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 5.44, p = 0.039), PLR (aOR: 4.86, 95% CI: 2.15 to 10.95, p < 0.001), SII (aOR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.44, p = 0.029), platelet count (aOR: 3.50, 95% CI: 1.11 to 10.99, p = 0.032), and hemoglobin level (aOR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.06 to 6.50, p = 0.038). This study identified preoperative anemia, abnormal platelet count, and elevated NLR, PLR, and SII to be associated with an increased risk of PJI among patients with a body mass index of ≥40 kg/m 2 . These findings may help surgeons risk-stratify this high-risk patient population. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Relationship between the clinical outcomes and the systemic inflammatory response index and systemic immune inflammation index after total knee arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an extremely damaging complication that can occur after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is no study in the literature investigating the relationship between systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and systemic inflammation immune index (SII) values and prognosis and infection in patients who have undergone TKA. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between the inflammatory index values and the rate of PJI in patients who had previously had TKA. A total of 187 patients who underwent TKA between 2015 and 2023years were retrospectively analyzed. The median value of the postoperative SII index was 1862.3 (1146.6-2630.4) in the infected group, while it was 1058.2 (605.0-1762.8) in the non-infected group (p < 0.001). In the infected group, the median value of preoperative SIRI was observed as 2.3 (1.7-3.5), while in the non-infected group it was 0.9 (0.7-1.5) (p < 0.001). The cutoff value for postoperative SIRI was observed to be 2.19, with a sensitivity value of 95%, a specificity value of 46%, the AUC value observed was 65%. The cutoff value for the postoperative SII index was observed to be 1058.96, with a sensitivity value of 100%, a specificity value of 50%. Our study has associated the inflammatory markers SIRI, SII, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, and platelet lymphocyte ratio with PJI, which are easy and inexpensive to obtain. There is no widely recognized serum biomarker that can be used alone with good sensitivity and specificity. This study contributes to finding the gold standard inflammatory marker for diagnosing PJI.

Porous Metal Augments Have Comparable Outcomes to Other Constructs for Severe Acetabular Bone Loss at Mid-Term Follow-up

BackgroundAcetabular reconstruction options in the setting of severe bone loss remain limited, with few comparative studies published to date. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for severe bone loss using porous metal augments to cup cage and triflange prostheses. MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of 180 patients who had Paprosky 3A or 3B acetabular defects and underwent revision THA. Patients treated with porous augments (n = 141) were compared with those who received cup cages or triflange constructs (n = 39). Failure of the acetabular construct was defined as undergoing acetabular revision surgery or radiographic evidence of loosening. ResultsThere was no difference in acetabular component survivorship in patients undergoing revision THA with porous augments or a cage or triflange prosthesis (92.2 versus 87.2%, P = .470) at a mean follow-up of 6.6 ± 3.4 years. Overall, survivorship free from any revision surgery was comparable between the 2 groups (78.7 versus 79.5%, P = .720). There was also no difference in dislocation (5.7 versus 10.3%, P = .309) or periprosthetic joint infection rates (7.8 versus 10.3%, P = .623). In a subgroup analysis of patients who had pelvic discontinuity (n = 47), survivorship free from any revision surgery was comparable between the 2 groups (79.5 versus 72.2%, P = .543). ConclusionsPorous metal augments in the setting of severe acetabular bone loss demonstrated excellent survivorship at intermediate-term (mean 6.6 years follow-up, even in cases of pelvic discontinuity, with comparable outcomes to cup cages and triflanges. Instability and infection remain major causes of failure in this patient population, and long-term follow-up is needed.