Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Research Articles

Left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation: benefits or complications?

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is a therapeutic option for refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). However, the retrograde flow increases afterload, leading to pulmonary edema, blood stasis in the left ventricle (LV) and formation of thrombi. Several strategies try to reduce LV pressure, including the percutaneous transvalvular microaxial pump (p-MCS) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, these interventions are associated to complications, such as limb ischemia, embolism, bleeding and hemolysis. Purpose This study aims to investigate whether simultaneous LV unloading at ECMO implant yields clinical benefits or complications compared to ECMO implantat alone. Methods Consecutive patients (pts) with CS requiring peripheral VA ECMO from January 2020 to August 2023 were prospectively included, comparing the group that received LV unloading through IABP or p-MCS to the group that received ECMO only. Standard statistical methods were used. Results A total of 38 pts required VA ECMO. 18 of them received LV unloading since cannulation (8 with IABP and 10 with p-MCS). In the group without initial LV-unloading (20), 3 pts required IABP and 1 p-MCS during support and 1 was changed to VAV ECMO. Change to axillar configuration was perfomed in 1 pts in the unloaded group and in 2 in the only-ECMO group. A higher prevalence of SCAI E (72.2%) was observed in the unloaded-ECMO, compared to the only-ECMO, where SCAI D was more prevalent (60%) (p=0.024). In the LV unloaded group, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was the leading cause of CS, while myocarditis was the predominant one in the other group (p=0.01). The simultaneous support had a higher rate of intubation (94.4% vs 50% p=0.004) and more acute pulmonary edema (44.4% vs 10% p=0.027). In the ECMO-only 2 pts required intubation during support and LV stasis was observed in 1, whereas no cases were reported in the LV-unloaded group (p=0.036). The mean PaO2/FiO2 during support were higher in the not unloaded group (284.54 vs 200.50 mmHg p=0.036), necessitating lower FiO2 levels (40.89 vs 61.47% p=0.003). In terms of complications, we included the 4 patients from the ECMO-only group who eventually required LV unloading in the unloaded-ECMO. There were no significant differences in the duration of support, in-hospital mortality, stroke, embolism, systemic and local bleeding, or hemolysis. Conclusions Pts with ECMO and LV unloading since cannulation debuted with more severe CS, more AMI as the underlying cause, higher rates of acute pulmonary edema, and intubation. Despite these challenges, they did not experience worse outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality or ischemic and hemorrhagic events. Notably, 4 patients initially managed with ECMO eventually required subsequent LV unloading. Consequently, the simultaneous implantation of ECMO and a LV unloading device appears to be a reasonable alternative for select patients with a higher risk profile.

D-20 | Gender Differences in the Utilization and Outcomes of Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO): A Single Center Study

D-20 | Gender Differences in the Utilization and Outcomes of Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO): A Single Center Study

Evolution of distal limb perfusion management in adult peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with femoral artery cannulation.

Limb ischaemia is a clinically relevant complication of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) with femoral artery cannulation. No selective distal perfusion or other advanced techniques were used in the past to maintain adequate distal limb perfusion. A more recent trend is the shift from the reactive or emergency management to the pro-active or prophylactic placement of a distal perfusion cannula to avoid or reduce limb ischaemia-related complications. Multiple alternative cannulation techniques to the distal perfusion cannula have been developed to maintain distal limb perfusion, including end-to-side grafting, external or endovascular femoro-femoral bypass, retrograde limb perfusion (e.g., via the posterior tibial, dorsalis pedis or anterior tibial artery), and, more recently, use of a bidirectional cannula. Venous congestion has also been recognized as a potential contributing factor to limb ischaemia development and specific techniques have been described with facilitated venous drainage or bilateral cannulation being the most recent, to reduce or avoid venous stasis as a contributor to impaired limb perfusion. Advances in monitoring techniques, such as near-infrared spectroscopy and duplex ultrasound analysis, have been applied to improve decision-making regarding both the monitoring and management of limb ischaemia. This narrative review describes the evolution of techniques used for distal limb perfusion during peripheral VA ECMO.

Occurrence, predictors, and management of late vascular complications following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

ObjectiveVascular complications (VCs) associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during index hospitalization are prevalent and associated with increased mortality. Few studies have evaluated late VCs following ECMO; this study aims to assess occurrence and management practices of late VCs following discharge. MethodsA retrospective single-institution review was performed of all patients surviving initial hospitalization after being cannulated for central or peripheral veno-venous (VV) or veno-arterial (VA) ECMO between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Primary outcomes were to categorize and determine the rate of late VCs. Late VCs were defined as any cannulated vessel injury resulting from ECMO cannulation presenting after discharge from index hospitalization. Analysis was conducted by cannulated vessel and stratified by VV or VA ECMO configurations. ResultsA total of 229 patients were identified, of which 50.6% (n = 116) survived until discharge. Late VCs occurred in 7.8% of the surviving cohort (n = 9/116); with a median time until presentation of 150 days (interquartile range, 83-251 days). The most common late VC was infection (n = 5; 55.6%) followed by progression to limb-threatening ischemia (n = 4; 44.4%). Urgent procedures were required in 55.6% of patients (n = 5), whereas 44.4% (n = 4) were elective interventions. Interventions performed for management of late VCs included lower extremity arterial revascularization (n = 6; 66.7%), major (n = 1; 11.1%) or minor amputation (n = 1; 11.1%), and wound debridement (n = 1; 11.1%). The majority of patients presenting with late VCs had initially been cannulated for peripheral VA ECMO (n = 8; 88.9%), and one patient (11.1%) was cannulated for peripheral VV ECMO. VCs during index hospitalization were seen in 77.8% of patients (n = 7) returning with late VCs. Odds for late VCs were significantly increased in patients that had been cannulated for ECMO as part of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio, 8.4; P = .016) and in cases where patients had experienced an index VC during index hospitalization (odds ratio, 19.3; P = .001). ConclusionsLate vascular complications after peripheral ECMO cannulation are not rare, particularly after arterial cannulation. Patients should be followed closely early after surviving ECMO with wound evaluation and formal assessment of perfusion with ankle-branchial indices in the cannulated limb.

In patients supported with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, what factors are associated with the development of spinal cord ischaemia?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'in patients supported with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, what factors are associated with the development of spinal cord ischaemia'? Altogether, more than 22 papers were found using the reported search, of which 10 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Of the 28 patients reported by included studies, the thoracic spinal cord was most commonly affected. Twenty patients (71%) survived to hospital discharge and 7 (25%) were reported to have neurological recovery. Potential confounders included coronary angiography, cardiac arrest requiring chest compressions and concomitant intra-aortic balloon pump. Consequently, all papers highlighted the likely multifactorial aetiology of spinal cord infarction in these patients. We propose that close neurological observation, particularly in patients who have received chest compressions, and management of potential aetiological factors is crucial to aid in timely diagnosis and potential prevention of this rare complication. Limiting sedation and neuromuscular blockade to enable neurologic assessment of the lower limbs may allow more timely diagnosis.

Comparison of percutaneous decannulation and open surgical repair for large-bore arterial access sites of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Following weaning of peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, removal of cannulas and repair of large-bore arterial sites is traditionally by open surgical repair (OSR). The use of a percutaneous vascular closure device (VCD) offers a minimally invasive alternative to OSR with potential for reduced operative complications, reduced hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality. A systematic review of Medline and Embase databases was conducted for studies comparing VCD-assisted decannulation with OSR following decannulation of peripheral ECMO. The primary endpoint was rate of post-procedural complications, namely wound infection and limb ischaemia. The secondary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Eight studies, with a total of 685 patients, met inclusion criteria. Forty-eight percent (n = 328) of patients underwent VCD-assisted decannulation with the remainder decannulated by OSR. Pooled analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing VCD-assisted decannulation are at significantly lower risk of overall complications than surgical repair (OR 4.34; 95% CI 2.19-8.57; p < .001). Specifically, there was a substantial decrease in groin infections (OR 6.77; 95% CI 3.07-14.97; p < .001) without notable differences in limb ischaemia or pseudoaneurysm occurrence between the VCD and OSR cohorts. There was a lower incidence of intra-operative bleeding and haematoma in the VCD cohort (p < .001 and p = .002, respectively). Vascular closure device-assisted decannulation of peripheral ECMO offers a significantly reduced risk of complications, particularly groin infections and bleeding. Future research should encompass larger cohorts, randomised controlled trials, cost-benefit analyses, and the training of surgeons, cardiologists and intensivists in VCD-assisted decannulation, potentially through the integration of simulation-based training.

Definitions of major bleeding for predicting mortality in critically ill adult patients who survived 24 hours while supported with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: a comparative historical cohort study.

The severity of bleeding events is heterogeneously defined during peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO). We studied three bleeding definitions in pVA-ECMO: the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO)-serious bleeding, the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC), and the universal definition of postoperative bleeding (UPDB) classifications. We included consecutive adult patients supported by pVA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock admitted to Lille academic hospitals between January 2013 and December 2019. We assessed the association of bleeding definitions with the primary endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality with the use of multivariate models accounting for time-dependent and competing variables. We compared models' performances using the Harrell's C-Index and the Akaike information criteria. Twenty-eight-day mortality occurred in 128/308 (42%) 308 patients. The ELSO-serious bleeding (hazard ratio [HR],1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.09 to 2.56) and BARC ≥ type2 (HR,1.55; 95% CI,1.01 to 2.37) were associated with 28-day mortality (Harrell's C-index, 0.69; 95% CI,0.63 to 0.74 for both). Predictors of ELSO-serious bleeding were postcardiotomy, body mass index, baseline platelets count, fibrinogen, and hemoglobin levels. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization-serious bleeding and BARC ≥ type2 are relevant definitions of major bleeding regarding their association with mortality in critically ill patients who survived the first 24hr while supported with pVA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock. CERAR (IRB 00010254-2022-050, Paris, France); first submitted on 18 April 2022.

Feasibility and Outcomes of a Cardiovascular Medicine Inclusive Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Service

BackgroundThere has been a significant increase in the utilization of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in recent years. Cardiothoracic surgery teams have historically led VA-ECMO care teams, with little data available on alternative care models. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of a cardiovascular medicine inclusive VA-ECMO service, analyzing patients treated with peripheral VA-ECMO at a large quaternary care center from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was death while on VA-ECMO or within 24 hours of decannulation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of the primary outcome. ResultsTwo hundred forty-four patients were included in the analysis (median age 61 years; 28.7% female), of whom 91.8% were cannulated by interventional cardiologists, and 84.4% were managed by a cardiology service comprised of interventional cardiologists, cardiac intensivists or advanced heart failure cardiologists. Indications for VA-ECMO included acute myocardial infarction (34.8%), decompensated heart failure (30.3%), and refractory cardiac arrest (10.2%). VA-ECMO was utilized during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 26.6% of cases, 48% of which were peri-procedural arrest. Of the patients, 46% survived to decannulation, the majority of whom were decannulated percutaneously in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. There was no difference in survival following cannulation by a cardiac surgeon vs interventional cardiologist (50% vs 45%; P = .90). Complications included arterial injury (3.7%), compartment syndrome (4.1%), cannulation site infection (1.2%), stroke (14.8%), acute kidney injury (52.5%), access site bleeding (16%) and need for blood transfusion (83.2%). Elevated baseline lactate (odds ratio [OR], 1.13 per unit increase) and sequential organ failure assessment score (OR, 1.27 per unit increase) were independently associated with the primary outcome. Conversely, an elevated baseline survival after VA ECMO score (OR, 0.92 per unit increase) and 8-hour serum lactate clearance (OR, 0.98 per % increase) were independently associated with survival. ConclusionsThe use of a cardiovascular medicine inclusive ECMO service is feasible and may be practical in select centers as indications for VA-ECMO expand.

Systemic Hemodynamics, Cardiac Mechanics, and Signaling Pathways Induced by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Cardiogenic Shock Model.

Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Although considered life-saving, peripheral VA-ECMO may also be responsible for intracardiac hemodynamic changes, including left ventricular overload and dysfunction. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also increase myocardial wall stress and stroke work, possibly affecting the cellular cardioprotective and apoptosis signaling pathways, and thus the infarct size. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of increasing the peripheral VA-ECMO blood flow (25-100% of the baseline cardiac output) on systemic and cardiac hemodynamics in a closed-chest CS model. Upon completion of the experiment, the hearts were removed for assessment of infarct size, histology, apoptosis measurements, and phosphorylation statuses of p38 and protein Kinase B (Akt), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinases (ERK-MAPK). Peripheral VA-ECMO restored systemic perfusion but induced a significant and blood flow-dependent increase in left ventricular preload and afterload. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation did not affect infarct size but significantly decreased p38-MAPK phosphorylation and cardiac myocyte apoptosis in the border zone.

In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Concomitant Use of Impella vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump - A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Japanese Claims-Based Database.

Patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) necessitating peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) often require an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella for unloading; however, comparative effectiveness data are currently lacking.Methods and Results: Using Diagnosis Procedure Combination data from approximately 1,200 Japanese acute care hospitals (April 2018-March 2022), we identified 940 patients aged ≥18 years with CS necessitating peripheral VA-ECMO along with IABP (ECMO-IABP; n=801) or Impella (ECPella; n=139) within 48 h of admission. Propensity score matching (126 pairs) indicated comparable in-hospital mortality between the ECPella and ECMO-IABP groups (50.8% vs. 50.0%, respectively; P=1.000). However, the ECPella cohort was on mechanical ventilator support for longer (median [interquartile range] 11.5 [5.0-20.8] vs. 9.0 [4.0-16.8] days; P=0.008) and had a longer hospital stay (median [interquartile range] 32.5 [12.0-59.0] vs. 23.0 [6.3-43.0] days; P=0.017) than the ECMO-IABP cohort. In addition, medical costs were higher for the ECPella than ECMO-IABP group (median [interquartile range] 9.09 [7.20-12.20] vs. 5.23 [3.41-7.00] million Japanese yen; P<0.001). Our nationwide study could not demonstrate compelling evidence to support the superior efficacy of Impella over IABP in reducing in-hospital mortality among patients with CS necessitating VA-ECMO. Further investigations are imperative to determine the clinical situations in which the potential effect of Impella can be maximized.

Novel Left Ventricular Unloading Strategies in Patients on Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate left ventricular (LV) unloading strategies in patients supported with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive patients requiring VA-ECMO support for any indication, who underwent novel LV unloading strategies with either direct left atrial venoarterial (LAVA) cannulation or pulmonary artery venoarterial (PAVA) venting, in comparison to Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). The primary outcome was successful bridge to transplant, LV assist device, or myocardial recovery. Forty-six patients (63% male, mean age 52.8 ± 17.6 years) were included. Fourteen patients (30%) underwent novel unloading with either LAVA or PAVA, 11 patients (24%) underwent IABP placement, and 21 patients (46%) underwent Impella insertion. In the novel LV unloading cohort, 10 patients (71%) survived to hospital discharge. Four patients (29%) were weaned from ECMO and eight patients (57%) underwent cardiac transplantation. Although a trend favoring cannula-based unloading for the primary outcome was noted, the cohort was too small for statistical significance (79% LAVA/PAVA, 57% Impella, 45% IABP; p = 0.21). However, probability of survival was greater in the LAVA/PAVA cohort compared to Impella and IABP ( p < 0.05). Thus, we demonstrate the efficacy of LA and PA cannulation as an alternative LV unloading strategy for patients supported with peripheral VA-ECMO.

A Novel Approach for Simultaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Left Ventricular Decompression Therapy With Impella (ECPella)

Percutaneously placed veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is commonly used to support patients with refractory cardiac arrhythmias or arrest and worsening cardiogenic shock (CS). Peripheral VA-ECMO by retrograde flow of blood in the aorta results in a significant increase in left ventricle (LV) afterload. A severely dysfunctional LV may be unable to overcome this afterload to open the aortic valve and unload itself. This may lead to LV distension, increased left ventricular pressure, poor coronary blood circulation, increased left atrial pressures, pulmonary edema, and pulmonary hypertension. Moreover, it jeopardizes ventricular recovery, particularly in the presence of ischemia-induced myocardial impairment. Furthermore, if the aortic valve remains closed during the cardiac cycle, stasis of blood in the LV and aortic root may increase the risk of thrombus formation. These complications may preclude cardiac recovery and the patient from being a heart transplant candidate. In patients with CS, utilizing Impella with VA-ECMO, commonly referred to as ECPella, has consistently been shown to reduce mortality and improve outcomes. Patients who need prolonged ECPella support as a bridge to recovery or transplant may remain bed-bound since ambulation of patients with two mechanical circulatory support devices is challenging. We present the technique of ECPella placement through Y chimney graft anastomosis on the axillary artery for arterial cannula and Impella insertion and percutaneous cannulation of the right internal Jugular vein for venous cannula. This technique gives the ease of ambulation and decannulation of VA-ECMO under local anesthesia without requiring intubation or a trip to the operating room.

Strategy for prophylactic application of peripheral va-ecmo in transplantation involving expected extremely prolonged ischemia time

Heart transplantation (HT) with extremely prolonged (&gt;6 hours) graft ischemia is associated with severe cardiac graft dysfunction. The high efficiency of prophylactic (preoperative initiation) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) to prevent severe hemodynamic disorders during cardiac surgery has been demonstrated. Objective: to determine the effect of prophylactic VA-ECMO on the perioperative period in HT with an expected graft ischemia &gt;6 hours. Materials and methods. Thirty-eight recipients (33 (86.8%) males and 5 (13.2%) females), age 11–66 (44.7 ± 12.0) years (median 48.0 years) were examined. Pre-transplant mechanical circulatory support (MCS) using peripheral VA-ECMO was applied in 15 (39.5%) recipients, in 6 of whom by prophylactic technique. The recipients (n = 38) were divided into 3 groups: 1) «no pre-HT VA-ECMO» (n = 23); 2) «pre-HT VA-ECMO» (n = 9) – pre-transplant VA-ECMO as a bridge to HT; 3) «prophylactic VA-ECMO» (n = 6). Results. In «prophylactic VA-ECMO» group, extracorporeal circulation (ECC) (94.0 [85.5; 102.8] min) and reperfusion time (20.0 [18.3; 27.6] min) were shorter (p &lt; 0.05) compared to «no pre-HT VA-ECMO» (161.0 [122; 191.5] and 60.0 [55.3; 70.5] min) and «pre-HT VA-ECMO» (127.0 [117; 150.3] and 35.0 [27.8; 48.8] min) groups. The vasoactive-inotropic score was lower (p &lt; 0.05) in «pre-HT VA-ECMO» and «prophylactic VAECMO» groups compared to recipients in «no pre-HT VA-ECMO» group, 12.1 [11.2; 14.0] and 12.5 [11.7; 14.8] vs. 16.0 [15.0; 18.5], respectively. The groups did not differ in terms of incidence of severe primary dysfunction. The «pre-HT VA-ECMO» and «prophylactic VA-ECMO» groups were characterized by shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) compared with «no pre-HT VA-ECMO» group (11.7 [10.0; 16.5] and 12.7 [11.3; 18.4], respectively, vs. 14.5 [13.0; 19.3]). The «no pre-HT VA-ECMO» and «prophylactic VA-ECMO» groups did not differ in the need for postoperative MST, 21.7% and 16.7%, respectively. The groups did not differ in terms of length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital mortality – 0% («prophylactic VA-ECMO») and 8.7% («no pre-HT VA-ECMO») and 11.1% («pre-HT VA-ECMO»), respectively. Conclusion. Prophylactic VA-ECMO in HT with extremely prolonged cardiac graft ischemia reduces ECC duration, reperfusion period, postoperative mechanical ventilation period, and the need for inotropic therapy.

Single-vessel access venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella technique for acute cardiogenic shock complicated by lung congestion.

The combination of the Impella and peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (Ecmella) is a promising treatment for critically ill patients. We report a single-access Ecmella approach using the brachiocephalic artery. A 65-year-old woman with acute myocardial infarction involving the left main coronary artery underwent intra-aortic balloon pump and peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) placement. Given the progression of pulmonary congestion and lower limb ischaemia, and an axillary artery diameter of 4.9 mm, we decided to perform a single Ecmella approach. A Y-shaped 9-mm Dacron woven graft was anastomosed to the brachiocephalic artery through a reverse T-shaped partial sternotomy. The Impella 5.5 and arterial cannula of VA-ECMO were introduced through each graft. Six days after, VA-ECMO was removed. Sixty-two days after the surgery, the patient received durable left ventricle assist device implantation. In conclusion, haemodynamic support using a single-access Ecmella through brachiocephalic artery allows for managing patients with narrow peripheral arteries.

Outcomes of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Percutaneous Left Ventricular Unloading in Fulminant Myocarditis.

Fulminant myocarditis requiring peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has a high mortality rate. We investigated clinical outcomes of combined use of VA-ECMO and percutaneous left ventricular assist device (VAD) (Impella) for fulminant myocarditis in 104 consecutive patients enrolled in the Japan Registry for Percutaneous VAD (J-pVAD) between October 2017 and January 2020. Patients were followed until hospital discharge and predictors of survival were analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model. The median support duration of combined use of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECMO/Impella) was 6 days, and the median left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 15% to 52% during support ( p < 0.0001). Overall, 66 patients (63%) survived to discharge. Multivariate analysis revealed ECMO/Impella support at a transplant center as an independent predictor of survival ( p = 0.0231). Patients treated at transplant centers had better 60 days survival rates when compared to nontransplant centers (83% vs. 55%, p = 0.005). However, baseline characteristics and treatment strategies differed between the two groups. This real-world national registry database suggested the difference in survival after ECMO/Impella support for fulminant myocarditis between transplant and nontransplant centers, which may indicate hospital variations regarding patient management, although further controlled studies are needed.

Central Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support Following Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose in Children.

Refractory vasodilatory shock (RVS) following massive calcium channel blocker (CCB) overdose remains a challenging clinical entity. Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has proven useful in several cases of CCB intoxication, however, its use in the pediatric population poses unique challenges given the generally small size of pediatric peripheral vasculature in comparison to the high flow rates necessary for adequate mechanical circulatory support. As a result of these challenges, our group has adopted a "primary" central ECMO cannulation approach to the treatment of children and adolescents admitted to our center with profound RVS after CCB ingestion. We present four cases within the last year using this approach. All patients were successfully discharged from the hospital with no late morbidity at most recent follow-up. Central ECMO support in cases of massive vasodilatory shock following CCB overdose is safe and effective and should be considered early in the clinical course of these critically ill patients.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: one-year outcomes from a cardiac intensive care unit led shock team program

Abstract Background Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used for severe cardiogenic shock (CS). Purpose To describe the initial experience with peripheral VA-ECMO within a cardiac intensivist team led program. Methods Retrospective analysis of a short-term MCS prospective registry, from 1 September 2021 to 1 December 2022. Clinical and device related variables were reviewed and reported. We assessed both patient outcomes as well as ECMO-related complications. Results A total of 21 patients were included in this analysis (50 ± 13 years-old, 80% male), ranging from SCAI-C (n = 8) to E (n = 5) and with a median predicted mortality by SAVE score of -4 points [IQ -6 - 0] (corresponding to 30% in-hospital survival). All cannulations were done percutaneously, mostly by trained cardiac intensivists and while at the CICU (n = 12). A femoro-femoral configuration was used for all patients. One patient was cannulated at the referring hospital and retrieved to our unit for further care. Three patients were cannulated during intra-hospital cardiac arrest and one patient was cannulated while breathing spontaneously (awake-ECMO). Mean venous and arterial cannula sizes were 22 ± 1.9 Fr and 17 ± 1.6 Fr, respectively. A 7 French (Fr) arterial limb reperfusion cannula was used in 85% of cases. The most frequent etiology was acute decompensation of chronic heart failure (n = 7), followed by acute myocardial infarction related CS (n = 5), fulminant myocarditis (n = 2) and massive pulmonary thromboembolism (n = 2). A left ventricle venting device was used in 70% of patients [intra-aortic balloon pump (n = 10); percutaneous microaxial pump ( n = 2)] and upgrade to a veno-arterio-venous configuration was necessary in one patient due to differential hypoxemia. Mean ECMO-run duration was 8.4 ± 4.8 days while mean CICU length of stay was 22 ± 17.9 In-hospital mortality was 40%. In survivors, decannulation was surgical in all but one patient. The most frequent strategy was bridge to recovery (n = 14). One patient was bridged directly to heart transplant, one to a temporary centrifugal left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and one to a durable magnetically levitated LVAD. Complications were common and included bleeding from cannula insertion sites (n = 19), renal replacement therapy requirement (n= 10), Harlequin syndrome (n = 2), cardiac tamponade (n = 2), intestinal ischemia (n = 3) and limb ischemia (n = 2). Conclusion VA-ECMO performed by cardiac intensivists is a feasible MCS strategy for severe cardiogenic shock patients in whom mortality, while high, was similar to large international published series. Further experience will allow for improvement in patient selection and minimization of device related complications.ECMO VA 1 year single-center experience

Abstract 17180: Association of Arterial Return Cannula Size With Survival in Adults Undergoing Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An ELSO Registry Analysis

Introduction: Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used to support critically ill adults with cardiogenic shock (CS), but the impact of arterial cannula size on survival remains poorly understood. Hypothesis: A smaller arterial return cannula will be associated with similar survival. Methods: We queried the ELSO registry for adults undergoing VA-ECMO from 2017-2022 and stratified them into small (&lt;16 Fr) versus large (≥16Fr) arterial cannula size. We restricted the cohort to patients with body surface area (BSA) 1.8-2.2 m 2 and excluded patients with a concomitant left ventricular venting device, central cannulation, and multiple ECMO runs. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included 24-hour lactate clearance and rates of on-support acute renal and liver injury. Results: Among 2963 adults receiving peripheral VA-ECMO without a concomitant left ventricular venting device, 491 (16.6%) patients had a small arterial cannula and 2,472 (83.4%) had a larger cannula. Patients with a larger cannula were more often male, had marginally higher BSA, a higher incidence of pre-ECMO organ failures, and more often had a distal perfusion cannula (Figure, panel A). There was no difference in 30-day mortality between patients with small (40.3%) versus large (42.9%) arterial cannula, p= 0.295 (Figure, panel B), which persisted after multivariable modeling: adjusted hazard ratio 0.97 (95% CI: 0.79-1.19, p= 0.78). Lactate clearance at 24 hours of ECMO support (Figure, panel C) and the rates of acute renal injury (37% vs 41%, p = 0.024) and hyperbilirubinemia (4.3% vs 4.3%, p = 0.96) were similar between the two arterial cannula size cohorts. Conclusion: For adult patients undergoing peripheral VA-ECMO support, the use of a smaller (&lt;16F) versus larger (≥16F) arterial return cannula was associated with similar rates of in-hospital mortality and metrics of end-organ perfusion.

Bilateral Femoral Cannulation Is Associated With Reduced Severe Limb Ischemia-Related Complications Compared With Unilateral Femoral Cannulation in Adult Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From the Extracorporeal Life Support Registry.

Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with femoral access is obtained through unilateral or bilateral groin cannulation. Whether one cannulation strategy is associated with a lower risk for limb ischemia remains unknown. We aim to assess if one strategy is preferable. A retrospective cohort study based on the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. ECMO centers worldwide included in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. All adult patients (≥ 18 yr) who received peripheral venoarterial ECMO with femoral access and were included from 2014 to 2020. Unilateral or bilateral femoral cannulation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of limb ischemia defined as a composite endpoint including the need for a distal perfusion cannula (DPC) after 6 hours from implantation, compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, amputation, revascularization, and thrombectomy. Secondary endpoints included bleeding at the peripheral cannulation site, need for vessel repair, vessel repair after decannulation, and in-hospital death. Propensity score matching was performed to account for confounders. Overall, 19,093 patients underwent peripheral venoarterial ECMO through unilateral ( n = 11,965) or bilateral ( n = 7,128) femoral cannulation. Limb ischemia requiring any intervention was not different between both groups (bilateral vs unilateral: odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.02). However, there was a lower rate of compartment syndrome/fasciotomy in the bilateral group (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97). Bilateral cannulation was also associated with lower odds of cannulation site bleeding (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99), vessel repair (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.79), and in-hospital mortality (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91) compared with unilateral cannulation. These findings were unchanged after propensity matching. This study showed no risk reduction for overall limb ischemia-related events requiring DPC after 6 hours when comparing bilateral to unilateral femoral cannulation in peripheral venoarterial ECMO. However, bilateral cannulation was associated with a reduced risk for compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, lower rates of bleeding and vessel repair during ECMO, and lower in-hospital mortality.

A multidisciplinary multistage complete mega aorta replacement and utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

A 49-year-old woman underwent a 11-month multistage complete replacement of a mega aorta. Replacement stages included ascending aorta and arch replacement in conjunction with a frozen elephant trunk thoracic endovascular aortic repair, extension of thoracic endovascular aortic repair to zone 5, and open repair of the thoracoabdominal aneurysm with the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for circulatory support. This case illustrates the complexity of repairing a mega aorta, the multidisciplinary care and staging needed for repair, and the use of peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for circulatory perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.