Perineal Canal Research Articles

Robotic Peritoneal Flap vs. Perineal Penile Inversion Techniques for Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.

To discuss perineal and robotic approaches to gender-affirming vaginoplasty. The Davydov peritoneal vaginoplasty has its origins in neovaginal reconstruction for vaginal agenesis. It has been adapted as a robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure and provides an alternative to perineal canal dissection in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. Both techniques represent variations of penile inversion vaginoplasty with successful outcomes and overall low rates of major complications reported in the literature. However, there are differing advantages and considerations to each approach. A perineal approach has been the gold standard to gender-affirming vaginoplasty for many decades. Robotic peritoneal gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV) is an emerging alternative, with potential advantages including less reliance on extragenital skin grafts in individuals with minimal genital tissue, especially among patients presenting with pubertal suppression, and safer dissection in revision vaginoplasty for stenosis of the proximal neovaginal canal. Additional risks of RPGAV include those associated with robotic abdominal surgeries.

Perineal canal repair using modified Tsuchida\u2019s technique

BackgroundThe perineal canal is a rare variety of anorectal malformations, identified by different nomenclatures like H fistula, double termination of the alimentary canal, and anovestibular fistula. Various approaches to repair this anomaly have been proposed.The present study aimed to review the results of perineal canal repair with modified Tsuchida’s technique, in seven girls treated in our unit between 2014 and 2019. These were classified as acquired and congenital type of perineal canal, depending upon their clinical presentations.ResultsOf the total seven cases, it was found that three of them had a perineal abscess and persistent anovestibular fistula formation, and they underwent definitive repair of the perineal canal after 12 weeks as they did not respond to the conservative management. Four girls had congenital anovestibular fistula without infection. All the patients underwent covering colostomy and definitive repair by modified Tsuchida’s technique. One patient had a recurrence of the fistula, due to early closure of colostomy and underwent redo repair. One patient with known immune deficiency died before colostomy closure due to severe sepsis. During the last follow-up, all six girls were continent (Kelly’s score 6/6), and the perineum had healed well.ConclusionThe perineal canal can be acquired or congenital. Irrespective of its etiology, modified Tsuchida’s technique has been found to be an easy and satisfactory method of its repair.

Risk factors for the recurrence of perineal canal.

The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for recurrence in the perineal canal (PC). Patients with PC who underwent operations were enrolled in this study and were divided into recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Preoperative infection, the age at the operation, the presence of colostomy and the treatment procedure for fistula were retrospectively investigated. Regarding the treatment procedure for fistula, either closure of the rectal wall with stitches or ligation of fistula in the rectum was performed. These factors were compared between the two groups. Six of 17 patients with PC who underwent surgical treatment had recurrence. There were no significant differences in the incidence of preoperative infection, age at operation or presence of colostomy (p = 0.60, 0.38, 1.00, respectively). In the recurrence group, all patients were treated by closure of the rectal wall. In the non-recurrence group, five were treated by the closure of the rectal wall with stitches and six by ligation of the fistula. There was a significant association between recurrence and the treatment procedure for fistula (p = 0.04). Closure of the rectal wall with stitches is a risk factor for the recurrence of PC.

Anorectal Malformations in Adolescent Females: A Retrospective Study.

Context:While most of the females with anorectal malformations (ARMs) present in either neonatal period or early infancy, a small percentage presents in their adolescence.Aim:The aim is to study the causes of delay in presentation, management, and postoperative outcome in these cases.Settings and Design:This is a retrospective observational study conducted in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow.Subjects and Methods:Records of females with ARM managed in one unit of the department from 2010 to 2015 were scrutinized. Of these, record of females who primarily presented in adolescence was reviewed. Data regarding the demographics, clinicoradiological presentation, management, postoperative stay, and follow-up were analyzed. Causes for delay in presentation were looked for.Statistical Analysis Used:Statistical analysis used was not required.Results:Out of 627 cases of ARM managed over 5 years, ten girls (5.3%) presented between 12 and 18 years (average 14.4 years). Main reasons for the delay in presentation were misinformation, illiteracy, and poverty. These comprised of anovestibular fistula (n = 5), anterior ectopic anus (n = 3), perineal canal (n = 1), and rectovestibular fistula (n = 1). Three (30%) girls had no problem apart from an abnormal anal orifice. Five (50%) girls had constipation as a major additional symptom. Four cases had a normal to mildly enlarged rectum on contrast study, whereas the rectum was moderately to hugely dilated in the remaining six cases. Six cases were managed with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty while an anterior sagittal anorectoplasty was done in four. Minor wound dehiscence developed in two cases. There was no mortality. In a mean follow-up of 16 months (8–26), constipation and soiling were seen in 5 (50%) girls. The overall outcome in these girls was satisfactory.Conclusion:Presentation of females with ARM in adolescence is not uncommon in the third world. A primary pull through is possible in these girls with mild-to-moderate rectal dilatations. A diverting colostomy before pull through is always a safe option in cases with severely dilated rectum and also otherwise. Moreover, a greater awareness regarding these malformations in the general public is required.

Perineal canal: a special entity of anorectal malformations in Vietnam

We report our clinical experience with the perineal canal and suggest the management. Retrospective chart review of patients with perineal canal were classified by lesion characteristics into Group I: active perineal inflammation, Group II: vulvar excoriation and Group III: no active inflammation. Group III patients underwent primary surgical repair. Group I and II patients underwent repair after medical management. The fistula was repaired by the modified Tsuchida's technique consisting of an anterior anopullthrough and excision of the fistula tract (reverse order). Between September 1999 and August 2003, we treated 120 cases of perineal canal. Group I, II and III consisted of 74, 12 and 34 patients, respectively. In two patients of Group I (2.7%), the fistula tract spontaneously closed. The remaining 118 patients were surgically treated with the modified Tsuchida's technique. Recurrences were similar between patients treated with colostomy (1/28 or 3.6%) versus without colostomy (3/90 or 3.0%), as well as between patients initially treated with primary repair (3/102 or 2.9%) versus patients undergoing reoperation with redo repair (1/16 or 6.25%). With proper initial medical treatment, the perineal canal could be repaired successfully in one stage with the modified Tsuchida's technique.

Long-term results of anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for the treatment of vestibular fistula

Purpose Vestibular fistula is the commonest anorectal malformation in the female child. This article reports the treatment and long-term follow-up of 1206 patients of vestibular fistula treated by anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (ASARP) in a single center for 38 years. Material and Methods All patients of vestibular fistula admitted and operated on at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, King George Medical University (Lucknow, UP India), from 1970 were included in the study; the age ranged from 2 days to 40 years. The diagnosis was made by clinical examination. We differentiated between anovestibular fistula (AVF) and rectovestibular fistula (RVF) in that the latter is a longer narrow fistula closely applied to the posterior wall of the vagina. Preoperative investigations included hemogram and blood glucose. Echocardiography was done in those patients showing a physical sign of cardiac anomaly. All patients were operated on in the lithotomy position by ASARP; this was done without colostomy in 1169 patients. In 6 patients, preliminary colostomy was done because of excessive perineal excoriation, and 31 others had colostomy done elsewhere. The striated muscle complex was delineated by electrostimulation, and anoplasty was performed after anchoring the rectum within the muscle complex. Washing of the perineum after passage of stools with application of povidone-iodine ointment constituted the local care. Intravenous antibiotics were administered for 48 hours and oral antibiotics (including metronidazole) for 5 days. The patient was discharged home by the fifth day. Results Follow-up ranges from 3 months to 19 years; uneventful postoperative recovery was seen in 1147 patients. They had normal growth and development, normal appearance of the perineum, and a normal quality of life. Complications were seen in 60 patients (5%) of which 42 had AVF and 18 had RVF. Eight patients had postoperative wound disruption that was minor in 4 and required colostomy in the other 4. Four patients had recurrence of vestibular fistula thus creating an iatrogenic perineal canal; this could be repaired by a second ASARP in 3 patients and required colostomy and PSARP in one child. Anal stenosis was seen in 11 patients; this was treated by dilatation alone in 6 and required posterior Y-V plasty in 5. The rate of complications in RVF was lower than AVF probably because of lesser number of patients; there was no difference in stooling pattern or continence between uncomplicated patient of RVF and AVF; however, fecal staining was seen in all patients undergoing revision surgery for complications. Conclusions This experience with ASARP showed a good result in 95% patients in a single-stage procedure. The technical ease and minimal preoperative and postoperative measures make ASARP the procedure of choice for vestibular fistula in females at all ages. Until sufficient experience is gained, it may be safer to operate on patients with RVF under cover of a protective colostomy.

“Perineal Canal”: A Rare Anorectal Malformation of Variable Complexity

Perineal canal (PC) is a fistulous tract that communicates the anus with the vulvar vestibule. Our aim is to show the variable spectrum of complexity of this caudal malformation. Patient 1 had a single urogenital orifice and a normal anus. After sigmoidostomy, a uterovaginal duplication was discovered upon opening the canal that was repaired at puberty. Patient 2 had a single urogenital orifice, a huge dilatation of a single vagina and an apparently normal anus. During perineal operation without diversion, the true anus was found which opened into the PC. Patient 3 had a single urogenital orifice, a uterovaginal duplication and an apparently patent anus. After colonic diversion, the PC was taken down revealing a normal urethral opening, the absence of an anus and a high rectovaginal fistula at the intervaginal wall. A posterior sagittal approach allowed extensive mobilization of the fistula and the rectum, fashioning of a single vagina and positioning of the rectum within the striated muscle complex. The cosmetic results were satisfactory. Patients 1 and 2 have normal continence and a near-normal perineal anatomy. Patient 3 is too young to assess continence. 1) Perineal canal is a malformation that may involve the genitourinary system as well as the rectum and perineum. This developmental disturbance of the caudal end is profound as judged by the vaginal duplication and the nearly cloacal pattern of some cases. 2) Repair may be as challenging as that of a regular cloaca requiring an individualized approach.

Labial flap: a versatile tool in the repair of recurrent perineal canal defects

Perineal canal, a not so uncommon deformity in Asian countries, sometimes breaks down after the usual techniques of repair. The labial pad of fat with its vascular supply provides good tissue for interposition between the rectal and perineal suture lines in these cases, with good results.

New transanal approach for surgical correction of perineal canal.

New transanal approach for surgical correction of perineal canal.

Management of congenital and aquired H-type anorectal fistulae in girls by anterior sagittal anorectovaginoplasty

Methods: Thirteen girls with congenital or acquired H-type anorectal fistulae underwent surgery between 1991 and 1996. In all cases, besides a normally placed anal canal, there was a fistulous communication between the anorectum and the genital tract. On the basis of the level of fistulous communication, these cases were divided into three groups: high, intermediate, and low (perineal canal). All patients underwent anterior sagittal anorectovaginoplasty. Surgical technique included division of all intervening tissue in midline between the perineal skin and the fistula. The whole fistulous tract was excised, and the remaining surrounding tissue was repaired in different layers. Of 13 patients, 12 were operated on without a protective colostomy. Results: There was no recurrence in any case, and all patients had good cosmetic results with a normal sphincter control. Although various techniques have been suggested for the surgical correction of H-type anorectal fistulae, most of them are applicable only to the low-lying fistula (perineal canal). Conclusions: To date, there is no satisfactory method available for correction of high fistula. The methods suggested for high fistula (abdominoperineal pull-through and endorectal pull-through) appear to be too extensive for this condition. Our technique of anterior sagittal anorectovaginoplasty can be used not only for low fistula but can also be used for intermediate and high types of fistulae. This technique is simple, safe, takes less time, and achieves good anatomic and functional reconstruction of the perineum.

Perineal canal.

Perineal canal (PC) is a rare anomaly constituting 4% of all anorectal malformations. Sixty patients (56 females and 4 males) with PC managed over the past 27 years are reported. The ages ranged from 2 days to 13 years. The chief symptom was passage of fecal matter through both the anus and the fistula. One girl had undergone previous, unsuccessful surgery. All our patients were treated by anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (ASARP), which allowed anatomic exposure and accurate repair of the anomaly. In 49 patients without any perineal inflammation primary ASARP was undertaken. Surgery was delayed in 11 patients with perineal excoriations and/or active inflammation. One patient died post-operatively due to unrelated causes and 1 developed a recurrence. Anal dilation was required in 7 cases. Fifty patients were seen at first follow-up 12 weeks after surgery. All were continent and had normal defecation without the use of laxatives. Thirty-four could be followed up to the age of 3 years; they were continent with normal bowel habits. There was no shift in the position of the anus and no instance of rectal dilation. Individualization of the management and operation by the anterior sagittal approach thus offers good results in this uncommon anorectal anomaly.

Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations and perineal trauma in the female child

Vestibular fistula and perineal ectopic anus are the most common anorectal malformations in female children. Anterior saggital anorectoplasty (ASARP) was used to treat 416 patients with these anomalies, as well as cases of perineal canal and third-degree perineal tear, during a 20 year period. Preliminary colostomy was performed in only four patients, who had a perineal tear. For ASARP, a midline incision was made and the rectum was separated from the vagina and placed in the center of the sphincteric muscle complex. The perineal body was reconstructed, and normal appearance of the perineum was achieved. Six patients had complications postoperatively (4 had secondary hemorrhage, 2 had wound infection). One patient with hemorrhage and one with infection required laying open of the wound and revision surgery after 12 weeks. Both recovered well. Of the 416 patients, 397 returned for follow-up 12 weeks after the surgery. Of these, 390 had a normal-looking perineum and normal defecation. Of the remaining seven patients, three had retraction of the recturn, one had recurrence of the fistula, and another had acquired perineal canal. These five children required revision ASARP and recovered successfully. The other two patients had mucosal prolapse, which reduced spontaneously. Three hundred twenty-six children of the 416 patients have had follow-up beyon the age of 3 years. Of these, 291 had normal bowel habits without the use of laxatives. Of the other 35 four had fecal impaction of unknown etiology, which was managed conservatively, 6 had anal stenosis (four underwent posterior Barrow's flap interposition and two responded to dilatation), and 25 had a posterior ledge that caused constipation and required cutback. Overall, eight patients (1.9%) required revision ASARP and 40 others (9.8%) had minor complications. This operation provides consistently good results, and the authors recommend it for the management of anorectal malformations and perineal trauma in female children.

Perineal canal: a simple method of repair

A perineal canal is a rare congenital, external cloacal anomaly. It is either low or high. We treated a girl with a low anomaly by excising the canal and letting it to granulate from the bottom up. We believe that this method is simple and that recurrence of this anomaly is avoided.

Perineal canal—Repair by a new surgical technique : K.L.N. Rao, S.R. Choudhury, R. Samujh, et al. Pediatr Surg Int 8:449–450, (July), 1993

Perineal canal—Repair by a new surgical technique : K.L.N. Rao, S.R. Choudhury, R. Samujh, et al. Pediatr Surg Int 8:449–450, (July), 1993

Perineal canal ? repair by a new surgical technique

Perineal canal is an infrequently encountered female anorectal anomaly. The available surgical techniques for repair of this malformation are unsatisfactory because of their high risk of recurrence. We present a new surgical technique with posterior repositioning of the perineal canal in continuity with the anorectum. The advantages are a low risk of recurrence and excellent functional and cosmetic results.

The perineal groove and canal in males and females--a third look.

We present 5 uncommon cases: One case of perineal canal in a female; two cases of perineal groove in females, one with normal anus and another with ectopic perineal anus. Two cases of perineal canal in males. The canal is deep in the perineum, runs forward above the root of scrotum, close to the floor of the urethra (which is normal), and opens on the undersurface of the penis. One of them is associated with covered anus incomplete with anocutaneous fistula as well opening on the scrotal raphe. In all 5 cases the perineal canal or gutter opens posteriorly in the ectodermal anal canal, immediately below the line of anal valves. A third look to the origin of these conditions will be discussed versus the 1st and 2nd looks of Stephens and Chatterjee. Embryological and histopathological studies will support our point of view.