Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events Research Articles

Comparison of supraglottic airway device and endotracheal tube in former preterm infants receiving general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

To date, endotracheal tube (ETT) remains the mainstream for preterm infants receiving general anesthesia. We aim to compare the perioperative respiratory adverse events between using supraglottic airway device (SAD) and ETT in former preterm infants receiving general anesthesia. Former preterm infants below 52 weeks of postmenstrual age scheduled for herniorrhaphy were randomized to receive SAD or ETT for general anesthesia. Infants with severe congenital cardiopulmonary disease, prolonged oxygen or mechanical ventilation dependence, and recent respiratory tract infection were excluded. Muscle relaxant agents and opioids were avoided in this study. 40 infants were assigned into SAD or ETT groups. Infants in the SAD group had a much lower rate of intraoperative desaturation than those in the ETT group (21.1% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.003). Incidences of other intraoperative and postoperative 24-h respiratory adverse events were similar between groups, including laryngospasm/bronchospasm, cough and stridor during anesthesia, and postoperative apnea, bradycardia, and supplemental oxygen use. All participants were extubated successfully in the operation room. SAD is recommended in former preterm infants receiving general anesthesia for herniorrhaphy in their early infancy as it much decreases the incidence of intraoperative desaturation compared to ETT.

Lateral versus supine position for tracheal extubation among infants after intraabdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

In this prospective randomised controlled trial, we compared the impact of the lateral versus supine position for tracheal extubation among infants aged two months to two years after intraabdominal surgery on the incidence of respiratory adverse events that may occur after extubation. The anaesthesia protocol was standardised. Among the 120 infants included (60 in each group), the demographic and perioperative data were comparable between both groups. The incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events after tracheal extubation was 21.6% and 5% in the supine and lateral position groups, respectively, with p = 0.007 and odds ratio = 3.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.18-12.6. Lateral position also reduced the incidence of airway obstruction with p = 0.004 and odds ratio = 11.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.46-95.3 and oxygen desaturation below 92% with p = 0.008 and odds ratio = 11.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.46-95. The lateral position seems to be practical and beneficial for tracheal extubation among infants.

Chinese expert consensus on pediatric anesthesia assessment and perioperative risk prediction (2024 edition)

The incidence of perioperative adverse events in children aged 0 to 15 years was 5.2%. Preoperative scientific and accurate anesthesia assessment is a crucial step in ensuring the safety of pediatric surgery. Perioperative risk prediction is a digital quantitative evaluation of the level of perioperative risk, which classifies the degree of danger. In order to further standardize the methods of anesthesia assessment and identify risk factors, Chinese Society of Anesthesiology organized experts in anesthesiology from children's specialty hospitals and general hospitals, along with statisticians from public health colleges, to jointly draft the "Chinese expert consensus on pediatric anesthesia assessment and perioperative risk prediction (2024 edition)".The anesthesia assessment includes history collection, physical examination, laboratory examination, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, difficult airway assessment, and identification and assessment of critically sick children. Perioperative risk prediction includes preoperative anxiety, perioperative respiratory adverse events, regurgitation and aspiration, emergence delirium, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative ICU admission, postoperative acute kidney injury, perioperative mortality, and risk prediction for in-hospital mortality in children with congenital heart disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery.This consensus has formulated a total of 16 recommendations, aiming to promote anesthesiologists' familiarity with the content of pediatric anesthesia assessment, identify risk factors for adverse events during the perioperative period, and take targeted measures to reduce the occurrence of adverse events and improve the safety of children during the perioperative period.

Early Adverse Respiratory Outcomes in Obese Pediatric Tonsillectomy Patients.

To determine if body mass index (BMI) is predictive of adverse respiratory events (ARE) in the obese pediatric population undergoing tonsillectomy. Case series with chart review. Single institution academic otolaryngology practice. All patients 3 to 12 years old with BMI ≥95th percentile that underwent tonsillectomy March 1, 2011 to July 15, 2020 were included. The study excluded patients with comorbidities that warranted admission independent of BMI, including Trisomy 21, gross developmental delay, neuromuscular disorders, and congenital heart disease. Perioperative AREs following tonsillectomy were recorded. AREs were defined as postoperative desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), intubation, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or new O2 requirement for >2 hours. Eighteen patients (8%) had at least 1 ARE. There were no children age 5 and older with a BMI 95th percentile to 98.9th percentile who had an early adverse respiratory outcome. Preoperative polysomnogram (PSG) metrics, obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (oAHI), and oxygen saturations (SpO2) nadir was significantly different between patients with and without AREs (mean oAHI 54.3 vs 17.4, P = .02; mean SpO2 nadir 73.1% vs 84.5%, P = .05). There was no significant difference in the BMI z score (2.88 vs 2.45, P = .09) between groups. AREs requiring inpatient management are uncommon in obese children after tonsillectomy. BMI is a poor independent indication for admission except at BMI extremes. We found significantly higher oAHI and lower SpO2 nadir on PSG indicate a higher risk for AREs and can guide admission postoperatively. There may be a subset of obese tonsillectomy patients who can be safely discharged home on the day of surgery.

The Safety of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adenotonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Adenotonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. The current standard for securing the airway in patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy is endotracheal tube (ETT) intubation. Several studies have investigated the use of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in this procedure. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of the LMA versus ETT in adenotonsillectomy. Databases were searched from inception to 2022 for randomized controlled trials and comparative studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The primary outcome is the rate of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs). Secondary outcomes included the rate of conversion to ETT, desaturations, nausea/vomiting, and surgical time. A subgroup analysis, risk of bias, publication bias, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments were also performed. Twelve studies were included in the analysis (4176 patients). The mean overall conversion to ETT was 8.36% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.17, 8.54], and for the pediatric group 8.27% (95% CI = 8.08, 8.47). The mean rate of conversion to ETT secondary to complications was 2.89% (95% CI = 2.76, 3.03) while the rest was from poor surgical access. Overall, there was no significant difference in PRAEs [odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% CI = 0.60, 2.22], desaturations (OR 0.79, 95% CI = 0.38, 1.64), or minor complications (OR 0.89, 95% CI = 0.50, 1.55). The use of LMA yielded significantly shorter operative time (mean difference -4.38 minutes, 95% CI = -8.28, -0.49) and emergence time (mean difference -4.15 minutes, 95% CI = -5.63, -2.67). For adenotonsillectomy surgery, LMA is a safe alternative to ETT and requires less operative time. Careful patient selection and judgment of the surgeon and anesthesiologist are necessary, especially given the 8% conversion to ETT rate.

Early versus late removal of the I-Gel in paediatric patients with mild upper respiratory tract symptoms undergoing ambulatory ilioinguinal surgery: A prospective observational study.

The optimal timing of I-Gel removal in children with mild respiratory symptoms remains controversial. Consequently, we tried to assess the impact of early versus late I-Gel removal on the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events among children aged one to five years undergoing ambulatory surgery under general anaesthesia with I-Gel airway ventilation. The anaesthesia protocol was the same for all patients. Children were divided into two groups according to the approach of I-Gel removal (early versus late). The incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events after the I-Gel removal was the main outcome, and a multivariable regression was performed to investigate the implication of the I-Gel removal in perioperative respiratory adverse events. According to our study, the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events was not correlated to the timing of I-Gel removal. However, prolonged postoperative oxygen support can be seen when the I-Gel is removed in anaesthetized children.

Laryngeal Mask Airway as an Appropriate Option in Pediatric Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectiveTo elucidate the safety and effectiveness of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) use in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. MethodsStudies were searched on the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes were major perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs), namely laryngospasm, bronchospasm, desaturation, and aspiration. Secondary outcomes were minor PRAEs, anesthesia time, and recovery time. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) by using random effects models. ResultsIn total, 5 RCTs comprising 402 patients were included. Regarding major PRAEs, laryngospasm (RR: 0.43, 95 % CI: 0.12 to 1.47; p = 0.18), bronchospasm, and aspiration all demonstrated no difference between the laryngeal and endotracheal groups. Desaturation exhibited a trend, but this trend was not sufficiently supported with statistical evidence (p = 0.09). For minor PRAEs, fewer patients experienced incidence of cough after laryngeal mask use (RR: 0.27, 95 % CI: 0.11 to 0.67; p = 0.005). Other PRAE, namely hoarseness (p = 0.06), sore throat (RR: 1.88, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 4.66; p = 0.18), and stridor, did not differ between the 2 groups. Additionally, both anesthesia time (WMD: −6.88 min, 95 % CI: −11.88 to −1.89; p < 0.00001) and recovery time (WMD: −4.85 min, 95 % CI: −6.51 to −3.19; p < 0.00001) were shortened in the LMA group. ConclusionLMA used in pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair demonstrated no greater safety risks than endotracheal tube intubation did. Thus, anesthesiologists may shift from conventional endotracheal tube use to LMA use. Moreover, anesthesia and recovery times were shortened in the LMA group, which resulted in more efficient use of the operating room. Because of these benefits, LMA could be an appropriate option for pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Level of Evidence:Treatment Study, LEVEL III

Predicting obstructive sleep apnoea and perioperative respiratory adverse events in children: role of upper airway collapsibility measurements

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and perioperative respiratory adverse events are significant risks for anaesthesia in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Upper airway collapse is a crucial feature of OSA that contributes to respiratory adverse events. A measure of upper airway collapsibility to identify undiagnosed OSA can help guide perioperative management. We investigated the utility of pharyngeal closing pressure (PCLOSE) for predicting OSA and respiratory adverse events. MethodsChildren scheduled for elective adenotonsillectomy underwent in-laboratory polysomnography 2–12 weeks before surgery. PCLOSE measurements were obtained while the child was anaesthetised and breathing spontaneously just before surgery. Logistic regression was used to assess the predictive performance of PCLOSE for detecting OSA and perioperative respiratory adverse events after adjusting for potential covariates. ResultsIn 52 children (age, mean [standard deviation] 5.7 [1.8] yr; 20 [38%] females), airway collapse during PCLOSE was observed in 42 (81%). Of these, 19 of 42 (45%) patients did not have OSA, 15 (36%) had mild OSA, and eight (19%) had moderate-to-severe OSA. All 10 children with no evidence of airway collapse during the PCLOSE measurements did not have OSA. PCLOSE predicted moderate-to-severe OSA (odds ratio [OR] 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–2.8; P=0.011). All children with moderate-to-severe OSA could be identified at a PCLOSE threshold of –4.0 cm H2O (100% sensitivity), and most with no or mild OSA were ruled out (64.7% specificity; receiver operating characteristic/area under the curve=0.857). However, there was no significant association between respiratory adverse events and PCLOSE (OR 1.0; 95% CI: 0.8–1.1; P=0.641). ConclusionsMeasurement of PCLOSE after induction of anaesthesia can reliably identify moderate or severe OSA but not perioperative respiratory adverse events in children before adenotonsillectomy. Clinical trial registrationANZCTR ACTRN 12617001503314.

Association between preoperative respiratory symptoms and perioperative respiratory adverse events in pediatric patients with positive viral testing

Study objectiveTo determine the association between the presence of upper respiratory tract viral infection symptoms and occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAE) in children with positive viral screening, and to analyze the risk of PRAE in children with SARS-CoV-2 compared to non-SARS-CoV-2 infection. DesignA prospective cohort study. SettingA tertiary, freestanding pediatric hospital in Dallas, Texas. PatientsChildren <18 years of age with positive respiratory viral testing who underwent general anesthesia. InterventionMeasurement of incidence of PRAE and severe adverse events during the first 7 postoperative days. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was a composite of PRAE: oxygen saturation < 90% for >5 min, supplemental oxygen for >2 h after anesthesia, laryngospasm, and bronchospasm. The secondary outcome was severe adverse events: high flow nasal cannula >6 l of oxygen per minute, admission to the ICU for escalation of respiratory support post-anesthetic, acute respiratory distress syndrome, postoperative pneumonia, cardiovascular arrest, extracorporeal life support, and death. Main resultsIn this convenience sample of 196 children, 83 were symptomatic and 113 were asymptomatic. The risk of PRAE was similar in children with active viral symptoms and asymptomatic children (risk difference: −1.9%; 95% CI: −10.9, 7.9%), but higher among children with documented fever within 48 h of the anesthetic (risk difference: 20.8%; 95% CI: 5.3, 39.7%). The multivariable adjusted odds ratio of PRAE was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.25, 1.85) for symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients, and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.14, 1.44) for patients with SARS-CoV-2 compared to non-SARS-CoV-2 infection. ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in the incidence of PRAE between symptomatic and asymptomatic children with laboratory confirmed viral respiratory infection, and between children with the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 compared to non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses. However, the risk was increased in children with recent fever.

Evaluation of risk prediction model for perioperative respiratory adverse events in pediatric anesthesia

Background: Perioperative respiratory adverse events are among the most common critical incidents in pediatric anesthesia. Three risk prediction models have been developed to predict occurrence of such adverse events in children. However, these tools were only internally validated, limiting generalization. The Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia risk prediction tool developed by Subramanyam et al. consists of five predictors: age ≤ 3 years, ASA physical status II and III, morbid obesity, preexisting pulmonary disorder, and surgery. Aims and Methods: We aimed to evaluate the suitability of Subramanyam’s model in predicting the occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in a more general tertiary care pediatric population, including anesthesia for both outpatient and inpatient procedures. Therefore we validated this scoring system in a tertiary care cohort of 204 children included in the APRICOT study at our hospital through retrospective analysis of this data. Secondarily, we aimed to study the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in our hospital. Results: Overall incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in our sample was 19,6%. Applying Subramanyam’s prediction model to our cohort, we found no patients categorized as low risk, 76 patients as intermediate risk and 128 patients as high risk. Discriminatory ability of the risk scoring system was modest, with AUC of the simplified model 0,65 (95% CI 0,57-0,74) and AUC of the original logistic regression model 0,66 (95% CI 0,57-0,75). Calibration of the simplified model was rather poor, with Brier score 0,49. The original logistic regression model calibrated better, with Brier score 0,18. A subgroup analysis considering solely ambulant patients in Ghent-APRICOT yielded comparable results. Conclusions: We conclude that the overall performance of Subramanyam’s risk prediction tool in our cohort was moderate. Modest discrimination and calibration suggest that the risk score may not reliably predict perioperative respiratory adverse events in individual patients in our tertiary care pediatric population. Therefore the clinical relevance of the implementation of this scoring system in our tertiary hospital would be negligible, which leaves us with the lack of good scoring systems to predict perioperative respiratory adverse events in our population. In addition, we found the incidence of these adverse events in our hospital to be markedly higher as compared to the sample of Subramanyam.

Effect of Tulobuterol Patch Versus Placebo on the Occurrence of Respiratory Adverse Events in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomies: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Perioperative respiratory adverse events are common in children. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the transdermal β-2 agonist, tulobuterol, compared with that of placebo on the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy. In this triple-blinded (patient, anesthesia provider, and outcome assessor) randomized controlled trial, 188 patients were randomly allocated to receive tulobuterol or a placebo. The tulobuterol groups received a tulobuterol patch (1 mg) masked with a bandage, whereas the placebo only received the bandage. The assigned bandage was applied to the patients 8 to 10 hours before the surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any perioperative respiratory adverse events: oxygen desaturation <95%, airway obstruction, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, severe coughing, or stridor. The outcomes were evaluated using the average relative effect test, which estimates the effect of individual components of a composite outcome and then averages effects across components. A total of 88 and 94 patients who received tulobuterol and placebo, respectively, were analyzed. The incidence of any perioperative respiratory adverse event was lower with tulobuterol (n = 13/88; 14.7%) than that with the placebo (n = 40/94; 42.5%), with an estimated average relative risk (95% confidence interval) across components of 0.35 (0.20-0.60; P < .001). The symptoms of airway obstruction were lower with tulobuterol (n = 8/88; 9.0%) than that with the placebo (n = 32/94; 34.0%), with relative risk (95% CI) of 0.31 (0.17-0.56; P < .001). The occurrence of severe coughing was lower with tulobuterol (n = 1/88; 1.1%) than that with the placebo (n = 8/94; 8.5%), with relative risk (95% CI) of 0.15 (0.03-0.68; P = .014). In preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy, the preoperative application of a tulobuterol patch could decrease the occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effect of the tulobuterol patch in a broad spectrum of pediatric anesthesia.

Effect of Nebulized Salbutamol Premedication on Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Children with Recent Respiratory Tract Infections

BACKGROUND&#x0D; A recent upper respiratory tract infection is linked to the development of peri-operative respiratory complications. In this study we wanted to evaluate the effect of salbutamol premedication on the incidence of peri-operative respiratory adverse events in children with a recent upper respiratory tract infection (PRAE).&#x0D; METHODS&#x0D; A randomized clinical trial study that was conducted at the Children Welfare Teaching Hospital for a period of six months. It included 90 children aged ≤ 16 years who underwent a surgical operation under general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway or a tracheal tube and were divided into three groups; (had a recent URTI and received preoperative salbutamol, those who had a recent URTI and didn’t receive preoperative salbutamol, and those with no URTI group). The preferred outcome was the difference in the rate of occurrence of PRAE between children who had received salbutamol and those who hadn’t.&#x0D; RESULTS&#x0D; Four children with no URTI (13.3%) developed peri-operative respiratory adverse events. The incidence of bronchospasm and severe cough was significantly higher in patients with URTI and who didn’t receive preoperative salbutamol than in those with URTI who received preoperative salbutamol.&#x0D; CONCLUSIONS&#x0D; Preoperative salbutamol doses 10 – 30 minutes before surgery have been demonstrated to reduce and treat peri-operative respiratory adverse events.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on preventing perioperative respiratory adverse events in children: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The most common critical incidents in pediatric anesthesia are perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs). The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on PRAEs in children. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist that provides sedation, anxiolysis and analgesic effects without causing respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine can diminish airway and circulatory responses during extubation in children. Original randomized controlled trial data were analyzed to study the putative effect of dexmedetomidine on PRAEs. By searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and PubMed, a total of ten randomized controlled trials (1,056 patients) was identified. PRAEs included cough, breath holding, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, desaturation (percutaneous oxygen saturation <95%), body movement and pulmonary rales. Compared with placebo, dexmedetomidine resulted in a significant reduction of incidence of cough, breath holding, laryngospasm and emergence agitation. The incidence of PRAEs was significantly reduced in dexmedetomidine compared with active comparators group. Moreover, dexmedetomidine decreased heart rate and increased post-anesthesia care unit stay duration by 11.18 min. The present analysis suggested that dexmedetomidine improved the airway function and decreased risks associated with general anesthesia in children. The present data demonstrated that dexmedetomidine may be a good choice to prevent PRAEs in children.

Sugammadex Vial Wastage: Implications for the Cost of Anesthesia Care in Children: Research Letter.

Sugammadex Vial Wastage: Implications for the Cost of Anesthesia Care in Children: Research Letter.

Predictors of perioperative respiratory adverse events among children with upper respiratory tract infection undergoing pediatric ambulatory ilioinguinal surgery: a prospective observational research

ObjectivesAnesthesia for children with an upper respiratory tract infection (URI) has an increased risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) that may be predicted according to the COLDS score. The...

Perioperative Respiratory Outcome of Patients with Eosinophilia: A Cohort Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

A respiratory adverse event is one of the main causes of critical events in the perioperative period. Perioperative distress symptoms like cough and stridor have been reported to occur in patients with hyperreactive airways. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between blood eosinophil count and perioperative adverse respiratory events among different age groups of patients who require general anesthesia for different types of surgeries. A cohort study was conducted on 197 patients of either gender, aged 3 years and above, belonging to ASA classes I-II, who were scheduled to undergo surgery requiring general anesthesia and intubation. Patients were stratified according to absolute eosinophil count into two groups: Group A (AEC 0 to 499/mm3) and Group B (AEC 500 to 1000/mm3). Patients were monitored for 24 hours in the perioperative period for adverse respiratory events such as bronchospasm, laryngospasm, a fall in SPO2 < 95%, and cough and stridor. A total of 197 patients were evaluated, with a median age of 37 ± 14.4 years. The percentage range of adverse respiratory events across different age groups was 35% in adults to 60% in children. Major complications noted were a fall in SPO2 < 95% (62.5%) and cough (27.7%) as per CTCAE v5.0 (November 27, 2017). The Naranjo score of adverse respiratory events was categorized as possible with mild level 1 severity. Adverse respiratory events were managed with humidified oxygen, antitussives, and bronchodilators. Eosinophilia is seen in one-third of the patients undergoing surgical interventions. Patients with a blood eosinophil count of ≥400/mm3 had an increased risk of exacerbations of respiratory adverse events in the perioperative period.

Perioperative Respiratory-Adverse Events Following General Anesthesia Among Pediatric Patients After COVID-19.

The perianesthetic morbidity, mortality risk and anesthesia-associated risk after preoperative coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) omicron variant in pediatric patients have not been fully demonstrated. We examined the association between preoperative COVID-19 omicron diagnosis and the incidence of overall perioperative adverse events in pediatric patients who received general anesthesia. This retrospective study included patients aged < 18 years who received general anesthesia between February 1 and June 10, 2022, in a single tertiary pediatric hospital. They were divided into two groups; patients in a COVID-19 group were matched to patients in a non-COVID-19 group during the omicron-predominant period in Korea. Data on patient characteristics, anesthesia records, post-anesthesia records, COVID-19-related history, symptoms, and mortality were collected. The primary outcomes were the overall perioperative adverse events, including perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs), escalation of care, and mortality. In total, 992 patients were included in the data analysis (n = 496, COVID-19; n = 496, non-COVID-19) after matching. The overall incidence of perioperative adverse events was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group than in the non-COVID-19 group (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89-1.94). The difference was significant for PRAEs (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.96-2.02) but not in escalation of care or mortality. The most pronounced difference between the two groups was observed in instances of high peak inspiratory pressure ≥ 25 cmH2O during the intraoperative period (OR, 11.0; 95% CI, 10.5-11.4). Compared with the non-COVID-19 group, the risk of overall perioperative adverse events was higher in the COVID-19 group diagnosed 0-2 weeks before anesthesia (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.1-20.4) or symptomatic on the anesthesia day (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 3.30-12.4). Pediatric patients with the preoperative COVID-19 omicron variant had increased risk of PRAEs. Patients within 2 weeks after COVID-19 or those with symptoms had a higher risk of PRAEs.

Do COVID-19 pandemic-related behavior changes affect perioperative respiratory adverse events in children undergoing cardiac interventional catheterization?

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) suddenly broke out in China in December 2019. Pandemic-related behavioral changes can cause perioperative respiratory adverse events in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Here, we compared the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) in CHD children with and without upper respiratory infection (URI) undergoing the cardiac catheterization before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsThis prospective observational single-center study was based at a tertiary care center in Shanghai, China. A total of 359 children with CHD with and without recent URI were included between January 2019 and March 2021. The overall incidence of PRAEs (laryngospasm, bronchospasm, coughing, airway secretion, airway obstruction, and oxygen desaturation) in non-URI and URI children undergoing elective cardiac catheterization was compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A logistic regression model was fitted to identify the potential risk factors associated with PRAEs.ResultsOf the 564 children enrolled, 359 completed the study and were finally analyzed. The incidence of URIs decreased substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic (14% vs. 41%, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the overall PRAEs also significantly declined regardless of whether the child had a recent URI (22.3% vs. 42.3%, P = 0.001 for non-URI and 29.2% vs. 58.7%, P = 0.012 for URI, respectively). Post-operative agitation in children without URI occurred less frequently during the pandemic than before (2.3% vs. 16.2%, P = 0.001). Behaviors before the COVID-19 pandemic (odds ratio = 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76–4.58) and recent URI (odds ratio = 1.79, 95% CI 1.09–2.92) were associated with PRAEs.ConclusionsCOVID-19 pandemic-related behavioral changes were associated with a reduction in PRAEs in non-URI and URI children undergoing elective therapeutic cardiac catheterization.

Risk Assessment of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events and Validation of the COLDS Score in Children with Upper Respiratory Tract Infection.

Backgroundandobjectives: Children are at greater risk of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), which can pose a higher risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs), than adults. The purpose of this study was to validate the COLDS score as a pre-anesthetic risk assessment tool for predicting the possibility of PRAEs. Materials and methods: Children aged under 18 years and undergoing elective surgery were retrospectively included. Logistic regression analysis and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to estimate the ability of the COLDS score to predict PRAEs. Propensity-matched comparison was evaluated using the cut-off value from the ROC curve. Results: Among the 6252 children, 158 children had a recent URTI and 34 cases of PRAEs were reported. Age, current symptoms, and COLDS score were found to be significant variables in predicting PRAEs. From the ROC curve, values of 0.652 (p = 0.007) for AUC and 12.5 for the cut-off value of the COLDS score were calculated. Propensity-matched comparison revealed that each and every component of COLDS contributed to the higher COLDS score group. In addition to higher COLDS score, younger age and current URTI symptoms were found to be significant risk factors for PRAEs. Conclusions: This study validated the predictive power of COLDS score as a risk assessment tool for children with URTI undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Impact of supplemental anesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia : Aretrospective analysis.

In preterm infants, spinal anesthesia (SpA) is recognized as an alternative to general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair (IHR); however, some patients require supplemental anesthesia during surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and impact of supplemental anesthesia on perioperative care and adverse respiratory and hemodynamic events. A retrospective study of preterm infants undergoing IHR at Heidelberg University Hospital within the first year of life between 2009 and 2018 was carried out. In total, 230 patients (255 surgeries) were investigated. Among 189 procedures completed using SpA 24patients received supplemental anesthesia. Reasons for supplemental anesthesia included loss of anesthetic effect, returning motor response, and respiratory complications. Compared to SpA alone, no differences were found concerning hemodynamic parameters; however, patients requiring supplemental anesthesia displayed higher rates of postoperative oxygen supplementation and unexpected admission to the intensive care unit. The rate of perioperative apnea was 2.7%. Apneic events exclusively occurred after supplemental anesthesia. Bilateral IHR and duration of surgery were associated with the need for supplemental anesthesia. Whereas SpA might be favorable when compared to general anesthesia for IHR, the data indicate that particular caution is required in patients receiving supplemental anesthesia due to the possible risk for adverse respiratory events.