Perioperative Allogeneic Blood Transfusion Research Articles

The Effect of Preoperative Anemia on the Odds of Allogeneic Blood Transfusion and Patient Outcomes in Colorectal Neoplasm Patients.

The optimal preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) value of colorectal neoplasm patients is still being debated. This study aimed at determining the effect of preoperative anemia on patient outcomes and allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). This retrospective cohort study enrolled colorectal neoplasm patients, that underwent surgery, from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. The primary outcomes were the association between anemia and average length of stay (ALOS) and the odds of ABT. The secondary outcomes were the risk factors of the primary outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to identify the association and risk factors. A total of 14,352 inpatients were included in the study, of whom 3,035 experienced (21.15%) mild anemia, 1,500 (10.45%) moderate anemia, and 104 (0.72%) severe anemia. Overall, 1,418 (9.88%) patients received ABT during the hospitalization, and 546 (3.80%) patients received perioperative ABT. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, compared with the no anemic group, the odds ratio [OR] of ABT during the hospitalization for patients with mild/moderate/severe anemia were 5.915, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.717 - 7.418; 104.777, 95% CI: 84.345 - 130.160; and 13,361.442, 95% CI: 816.004 - 218,783.511, respectively, and the OR of periopera¬tive ABT were 4.332, 95% CI: 3.245 - 5.785; 27.492, 95% CI: 20.974 - 36.037; and 20.912, 95% CI: 11.832 - 36.959, respectively. Besides, the ALOS was longer, β were 0.619, 95% CI: 0.346 - 0.892; 1.188, 95% CI: 0.821 - 1.554; and 1.395, 95% CI: 0.107 - 2.684, respectively. Anemia is a common phenomenon in colorectal neoplasm surgical patients, and even mild anemia could be a deleterious predictor on the outcomes of colorectal neoplasm patients that underwent surgery.

O145: Autologous blood transfusion reduces the requirement for perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Abstract Introduction Major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery is associated with a risk of major blood loss. We aimed to assess whether autologous transfusion of blood salvaged intraoperatively reduced postoperative allogenic transfusion in this patient cohort. Materials and Methods In this single-centre study, information from a prospective database of 501 patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary resection (2015–2022) was analysed. Patients who received cell salvage (n=264) were compared with those who did not (n=237). Nonautologous (allogenic) transfusion was assessed from the time of surgery to 5 days postsurgery, and blood loss tolerance was calculated using the Lemmens–Bernstein–Brodosky formula. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with allogenic blood transfusion avoidance. Results 32% of lost blood volume was replaced through autologous transfusion in patients receiving cell salvage. Although the cell salvage group experienced significantly higher intraoperative blood loss compared with the noncell salvage group (1360 vs. 971 ml, P=0.0005), they received significantly fewer allogenic red blood cell units (0.92 vs. 1.5 units/patient, P=0.03). Correction of blood loss tolerance in patients undergoing cell salvage was independently associated with avoidance of allogenic transfusion (Odds ratio 0.05 (0.006–0.38) P=0.005). In a subgroup analysis, cell salvage was associated with significant reduction in 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major hepatectomy (1 vs. 6%, P=0.04). Conclusion Cell salvage use was associated with reduction in allogenic blood transfusion and a reduction in 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. Prospective trials are warranted to understand whether the use of cell salvage should be routinely utilised for major hepatectomy.

Effect of Perioperative Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in Causing Surgical Site Infection in Elective Gastrointestinal Surgeries: A Comparative Study among the Pediatric Population in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh

Background: Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) has been reported as a major risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery. Objective: To find out whether perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion is a significant risk factor for surgical site infection in children undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out at the Department of Pediatric Surgery in Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, from January, 2021, to June, 2022, for a period of 18 months. According to CDC standards, patients who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgical procedure or clean-contaminated surgical wound (class II) were chosen as the study population. Total 256 patients were divided into two groups according to the blood transfusion as transfused and non-transfused group. Preoperative and postoperative day 1 CBC were done to observe the lymphocyte count. Blood transfusions were recorded during the perioperative period. After surgery, patients were followed up to check for surgical site infection and anastomotic leakage. Pus or wound swab for C/S was done in all the patients who developed SSI. The duration of the hospital stay after surgery was also noted. Results: Most of the study subjects in both the groups were ≤5 years(p=0.095). Males were predominant than females in both groups (p=0.014). Infection was found significantly higher among the transfused group (34.6%) than non-transfused group (14.6%) (p=0.001). In both the groups common infection was superficial SSI (12.0% in transfused group and 6.5% in non-transfused group). Among the infections, bacterial growth was 39.1% in Group A and 38.9% in Group B (p>0.786). Postoperative duration of hospital stay was 10.56 ± 4.05 days and 8.47 ± 2.67 days in Group A and Group B respectively (p<0.001). Mean lymphocyte count in Group A and group B was (2353.9±1647.7 vs 3792.5±1455.9; p<0.001). Conclusion: Allogeneic blood ........

Efficacy of intraoperative blood salvage and autotransfusion in living-donor liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

Liver transplantation (LT) may be associated with massive blood loss and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. Intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion (IBSA) can reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of blood salvage in LT. Among 355 adult patients who underwent elective living-donor LT between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, 59 recipients without advanced hepatocellular carcinoma received IBSA using Cell Saver (CS group). Based on sex, age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, preoperative laboratory results, and other factors, 118 of the 296 recipients who did not undergo IBSA were matched using propensity score (non-CS group). The primary outcome was the amount of intraoperative allogenic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Comparisons were made between the two groups regarding the amount of other blood components transfused and postoperative laboratory findings. The transfused allogeneic RBC for the CS group was significantly lower than that of the non-CS group (1,506.0 vs. 1,957.5 ml, P = 0.026). No significant differences in the transfused total fresh frozen plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate, and estimated blood loss were observed between the two groups. The postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion was significantly lower in the CS group than in the non-CS group (1,500.0 vs. 2,100.0 ml, P = 0.039). No significant differences in postoperative laboratory findings were observed at postoperative day 1 and discharge. Using IBSA during LT can effectively reduce the need for perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions without causing subsequent coagulopathy.

A commentary on 'Autologous blood transfusion reduces the requirement for perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a retrospective cohort study'.

A commentary on 'Autologous blood transfusion reduces the requirement for perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a retrospective cohort study'.

Does perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion worsen the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma? A meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.

Allogeneic blood transfusion is required in a part of liver resection. The effect of allogeneic blood transfusion on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. To investigate whether perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (PBT) affects the long-term prognosis of patients with HCC, we conducted a meta-analysis that included only propensity score-matched (PSM) studies. The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to identify PSM studies that compared the long-term outcomes of allogeneic blood transfusion in resected HCC patients. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were calculated. This meta-analysis included 9 PSM studies with 12 datasets involving 2476 patients. Lower OS and RFS in HCC patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion were observed than those in patients not receiving blood transfusion (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.64; p < 0.01; RFS: HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56; p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with BCLC A HCC, those receiving allogeneic blood transfusion had lower OS and RFS (OS: HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.61-3.21; RFS: HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.30-3.41). OS and RFS were similar in both groups of patients with BCLC B and C HCC. The receipt of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion is associated with a decrease in OS and RFS. These results seem to be reliable for patients in BCLC stage A. But more high-quality research is needed to confirm this conclusion.

Autologous blood transfusion reduces the requirement for peri-operative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery is associated with a risk of major blood loss. We aimed to assess whether autologous transfusion of blood salvaged intra-operatively reduces the requirement for post-operative allogenic transfusion in this patient cohort. In this single centre study, information from a prospective database of 501 patients undergoing major HPB resection (2015-2022) was analysed. Patients who received cell salvage (n=264) were compared with those who did not (n=237). Non-autologous (allogenic) transfusion was assessed from the time of surgery to 5 days post-surgery, and blood loss tolerance was calculated using the Lemmens-Bernstein-Brodosky formula. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with allogenic blood transfusion avoidance. 32% of lost blood volume was replaced through autologous transfusion in patients receiving cell salvage. Although the cell salvage group experienced significantly higher intra-operative blood loss compared with the non-cell salvage group (1360ml vs 971ml, P=0.0005), they received significantly less allogenic red blood cell units (1.5 vs. 0.92 units/patient, P=0.03). Correction of blood loss tolerance in patients who underwent cell salvage was independently associated with avoidance of allogenic transfusion (OR 0.05 (0.006-0.38) P=0.005). In a subgroup analysis, cell salvage use was associated with a significant reduction in 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major hepatectomy (6% vs. 1%, P=0.04). Cell salvage use was associated with a reduction in allogenic blood transfusion and a reduction in 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. Prospective trials are warranted to understand whether the use of cell salvage should be routinely utilised for major hepatectomy.

Efficacy of preoperative Tranexamic Acid in patients undergoing intertrochanteric hip fracture surgery: A randomized placebo controlled trial.

To determine the efficacy of preoperative Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in reducing perioperative allogenic blood transfusion frequency in patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS). We conducted this placebo controlled double-blinded randomized trial in Orthopaedics & Traumatolgy Division Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from 1st January 2020 to 25th December 2022. All patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures fulfilling the inclusion criteria were treated with Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and were randomly divided into two equal groups. One group was administered single dose IV Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in a dose of 15mg/kg body weight in 100ml of saline while the other group (Placebo) was given 100 ml normal saline preoperatively. Post-operative Hemoglobin was measured on first, second and third day. The frequency of allogenic blood transfusions in the perioperative period was determined in both groups based upon the transfusion trigger (Hemoglobin 9g/dl). Categorical variables were compared with Chi-square test and mean with Independent sample t-test. P value of <0.05 was considered significant. The total number of patients in our trial were 200 which were equally but randomly allocated into TXA group and Placebo group each containing 100 patients. The mean age of the patients in TXA group was 48.16±1.75 years and the age of patients in the Placebo group was 48.35±1.60. The baseline demographic and clinical variables of both groups were identical (p< 0.05). The average preoperative hemoglobin was 11.5±4.2 g/dl in TXA group and 11.3±2.4g/dl in the Placebo group (p>0.05). The frequency of allogenic blood transfusion was significantly lower (p<0.05) in TXA group (13%, n=13) than in the Placebo group (41%, n=41). Tranexamic acid (TXA) significantly reduces the frequency of peri operative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) for intertrochanteric fractures.

SP7.4 Autologous blood transfusion reduces the requirement for peri-operative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery

Abstract Aims Major HPB surgery is associated with a high risk of major blood loss. We aimed to assess whether autologous transfusion of blood salvaged intra-operatively reduces the requirement for post-operative allogenic transfusion. This is clinically important because blood is a scarce resource and allogenic transfusion is associated with the potential for morbidity. Methods We analysed data from a prospective database of 501 patients undergoing major HPB resection (2015–2022). Patients who received cell salvage (n=264) were compared with those who did not (n=237). Non-autologous transfusion was assessed from the time of surgery to 5 days post-surgery, and blood loss tolerance was calculated using the Lemmens-Bernstein-Brodosky formula. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with the need for allogenic blood transfusion. Results 32% of lost blood volume was replaced through autologous transfusion in patients receiving cell salvage. Although cell salvage patients experienced significantly higher intra-operative blood loss compared with the non-cell salvage group (1360ml vs 971ml, p=0.0005), they received significantly less allogenic red blood cell units (1.5 vs 0.92 units/patient, p=0.03). In addition, more of the non-cell salvage patients required low-level transfusion (≤3 units). Use of cell salvage and correction of blood loss tolerance are both independently associated with avoidance of transfusion. There was no difference in major morbidity, 30 or 90-day mortality between the groups. Conclusions Use of cell salvage was associated with a reduction in allogenic blood transfusion. Further work is needed to understand whether this is a cost-effective means of reducing allogenic transfusion to support the routine use of intraoperative cell salvage in major HPB surgery.

Allogeneic Blood Transfusion and Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients with Mild and Moderate Anemia of Any Cause? A Retrospective Cohort Study in Total Revision Hip Surgery

Introduction: Patients undergoing revision total hip surgery (RTHS) have a high prevalence of mild and moderate preoperative anemia, associated with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions (ABT) and postoperative complications in preoperatively mild compared to moderate anemic patients undergoing RTHS who did not receive a diagnostic anemia workup and treatment before surgery. Methods: We included 1,765 patients between 2007 and 2019 at a university hospital. Patients were categorized according to their severity of anemia using the WHO criteria of mild, moderate, and severe anemia in the first Hb level of the case. Patients were grouped as having received no ABT, 1–2 units of ABT, or more than 2 units of ABT. Need for intraoperative ABT was assessed in accordance with institutional standards. Primary endpoint was the compound incidence of postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included major/minor complications and length of hospital and ICU stay. Results: Of the 1,765 patients, 31.0% were anemic of any cause before surgery. Transfusion rates were 81% in anemic patients and 41.2% in nonanemic patients. The adjusted risks for compound postoperative complication were significantly higher in patients with moderate anemia (OR 4.88, 95% CI: 1.54–13.15, p = 0.003) but not for patients with mild anemia (OR 1.93, 95% CI: 0.85–3.94, p < 0.090). Perioperative ABT was associated with significantly higher risks for complications in nonanemic patients and showed an increased risk for complications in all anemic patients. In RTHS, perioperative ABT as a treatment for moderate preoperative anemia of any cause was associated with a negative compound effect on postoperative complications, compared to anemia or ABT alone. Discussion: ABT is associated with adverse outcomes of patients with moderate preoperative anemia before RTHS. For this reason, medical treatment of moderate preoperative anemia may be considered.

Association of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions and long-term outcomes following radical surgery for gastric and colorectal cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-adjusted observational studies.

Previous meta-analyses reporting significant associations between perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions and poor prognosis in gastric cancer or colorectal cancer had a high risk of confounding bias. This meta-analysis explored this issue using observational studies that applied propensity score analysis. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for manuscripts published between 2013 and 2022. Studies applying propensity score analysis were included to investigate the association between perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions and prognosis in gastric cancer or colorectal cancer after radical surgery. Pooled HRs for overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated using a fixed-effect model or random-effect model according to heterogeneity. Twelve retrospective cohort studies with 17 607 patients reported were included. Ten studies applied propensity score matching and two applied inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. A total of 5962 patients were analysed after propensity score adjustment. After propensity score adjustment, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions did not correlate with disease-free survival in gastric cancer (HR 1.16; 95 per cent c.i. 0.96-1.39; heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-squared test and inconsistency index (I2) = 57 per cent) or colorectal cancer (HR 1.12; 95 per cent c.i. 0.84-1.49; I2 = 54 per cent). However, after propensity score adjustment, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions were significantly associated with worse overall survival in gastric cancer (HR 1.20; 95 per cent c.i. 1.08-1.32; I2 = 25 per cent) and colorectal cancer (HR 1.40; 95 per cent c.i. 1.06-1.85; I2 = 52 per cent). Subgroup analyses showed that perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions did not correlate with overall survival in colorectal cancer when major postoperative complications were balanced after propensity score. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion is not correlated with recurrence of gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions are significantly associated with worse overall survival in gastric cancer and colorectal cancer, which may be attributable to unbalanced major postoperative complications after propensity score adjustment.

The association between intraoperative fluid management and perioperative allogenic blood transfusion during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Bleeding and transfusion remain important concerns during surgical correction of scoliosis even when multiple conservative strategies, such as preoperative recombinant erythropoietin and/or antifibrinolytic agents, are used. The current work aimed to determine the impact of other potential risk factors, especially the volume of intraoperative fluid intake, on the perioperative risk of allogenic transfusion during surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This prospective study included all cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis operated in a single center during 2 years (2018-2020). Predictors analyzed were as follows: body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, thoracoplasty, preoperative halo-gravity, volume of intraoperative crystalloid administration, use of esophageal Doppler (for goal-directed fluid therapy), and duration of surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Two hundred patients were included in the analysis. Multivariable analysis found: an increased volume of intraoperative crystalloid administration as a significant predictor of allogenic blood transfusion. Receiving operator characteristics analysis found the model exhibiting an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.95). Optimizing stroke volume using esophageal Doppler was associated with a decrease in intraoperative crystalloid intake. These results indicate a statistical association between the increase in crystalloid intake and the risk of allogenic blood transfusion during surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Controlled studies are needed to address the causative relation between intraoperative fluid intake and the risk of allogenic transfusion.

Perioperative allogenic blood transfusions are associated with increased fracture related infection rates, but not nonunion in operatively treated distal femur fractures

IntroductionDistal femur fractures are common injuries that remain difficult for orthopedic surgeons to treat. High complication rates, including nonunion rates as high as 24% and infection rates of 8%, can lead to increased morbidity for these patients. Allogenic blood transfusions have previously been identified as risk factors for infection in total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusion surgeries. No studies have explored the relationship between blood transfusions and fracture related infection (FRI) or nonunion in distal femur fractures. Methods418 patients with operatively treated distal femur fractures at two level I trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics were collected including age, gender, BMI, medical comorbidities, and smoking. Injury and treatment information was also collected including open fracture, polytrauma status, implant, perioperative transfusions, FRI, and nonunion. Patients with less than three months of follow up were excluded. Results366 patients were included in final analysis. One hundred thirty-nine (38%) patients received a perioperative blood transfusion. Forty-seven (13%) nonunions and 30 (8%) FRI were identified. Allogenic blood transfusion was not associated with nonunion (13% vs 12%, P = 0.87), but was associated with FRI (15% vs 4%, P<0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis identified a dose dependent relationship between number of perioperative blood transfusions and FRI: total transfusion ≥2 U PRBC RR= 3.47(1.29, 8.10, P = 0.02), ≥3 RR= 6.99 (3.01, 12.40, P<0.001), and ≥4 RR= 8.94 (4.03, 14.42, P<0.001). DiscussionIn patients undergoing operative treatment of distal femur fractures, perioperative blood transfusions are associated with increased risk of fracture related infection, but not the development of a nonunion. This risk association increases in a dose-dependent relationship with increasing total blood transfusions received.

Efficacy of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid on Perioperative Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirement in Spine Fusion Surgery

Introduction: Blood loss associated with spine fusion surgery is a common potential cause of morbidity and often requires a blood transfusion, which subjects patients to risks of blood transfusion. Tranexamic acid is used intra-operatively to reduce bleeding in major surgeries. This study aims to evaluate its efficacy on perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirement in patients undergoing spine fusion surgery&#x0D; Methods: This prospective randomised controlled study was conducted at Department of Orthopedics of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital between August 2015 and July 2016. Patients undergoing spine fusion surgery were randomly assigned to group A (TXA) and group B (control) equally, thirty patients in each group. TXA was given to group A in a loading dose of 10 mg/kg, followed by continuous infusion of 1 mg/kg/hr during surgery. Outcome measures included perioperative blood loss, amount of blood transfusion, and safety and adverse effects. The data were analyzed by means of SPSS version 21.0. The results were presented as mean ± SD. Differences were considered significant if the P-value was &lt;0.05.&#x0D; Results: Sixty patients (31 males, 29 females) with mean age of 39.95 years were enrolled in study, thirty patients in each group. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the 2 study groups with regard to age, sex, weight, preoperative hemoglobin, level of fusion as well as operative time. The amount of perioperative blood loss was significantly less in the group A versus group B, 241.274±162.819 ml vs 661.053±189.469 ml, p=0.000. There was no difference in the incidence of allogenic blood transfusion. There were no complications related to use of TXA in this study.&#x0D; Conclusion: TXA provided an effective and safe method for reduction of blood loss during and after spine fusion surgery. However, there was no difference in the incidence of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion.

The Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid for Reducing Blood Transfusion Rates in Extracapsular Hip Fractures: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Perioperative allogenic blood transfusions for patients with hip fractures are associated with increased costs and complications. This prospective randomized controlled trial evaluated whether tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood transfusion rates and blood loss in extracapsular hip fractures, when administered at the time of hospital admission. Patients with closed intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric femur fractures undergoing intramedullary nailing (n=100) were enrolled from October 2015 to January 2019. On arrival to the hospital, patients were randomized to receive either 1 g of intravenous TXA or normal saline. Blood transfusion rates from hospital arrival to postoperative day 5 or discharge, blood loss from hospital arrival to postoperative day 3 or 4, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, and major complications were evaluated. Six patients from the TXA group and five from the placebo group were excluded because of canceled surgery, study drug infusion after incision, multiple fractures, or dropout. Patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Postoperative transfusion rates were 17.5% (7 of 40) in the TXA group and 36.7% (18 of 49) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22-1.03; P=.046). Total blood loss was significantly less in the TXA group (mean difference, 367 mL; 95% CI, 76-657; P=.01). No significant differences were found for intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, or 30-day major complications. TXA administered on hospital arrival decreased the risk of postoperative blood transfusion and mean perioperative blood loss in patients with extracapsular hip fractures. We recommend a single-dose intravenous administration of TXA at the time of hospital admission for patients with extracapsular hip fractures. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e303-e309.].

Preoperative risk factors predict perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing primary lung cancer resections: a retrospective cohort study from a high-volume thoracic surgery center

BackgroundOur study aimed to identify preoperative predictors for perioperative allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) in patients undergoing major lung cancer resections in order to improve the perioperative management of patients at risk for ABT.MethodsPatients admitted between 2014 and 2016 in a high-volume thoracic surgery clinic were retrospectively evaluated in a cohort study based on a control group without ABT and the ABT group requiring packed red blood cell units within 15 days postoperatively until discharge. The association of ABT with clinically established parameters (sex, preoperative anemia, liver and coagulation function, blood groups, multilobar resections) was analyzed by contingency tables, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and logistic regression analysis, taking into account potential covariates.Results60 out of 529 patients (11.3%) required ABT. N1 and non-T1 tumors, thoracotomy approach, multilobar resections, thoracic wall resections and Rhesus negativity were more frequent in the ABT group. In multivariable analyses, female sex, preoperative anemia, multilobar resections, as well as serum alanine-aminotransferase levels, thrombocyte counts and Rhesus negativity were identified as independent predictors of ABT, being associated with OR (95% Confidence interval, p-value) of 2.44 (1.23–4.88, p = 0.0112), 18.16 (8.73–37.78, p < 0.0001), 5.79 (2.50–13.38, p < 0.0001), 3.98 (1.73–9.16, p = 0.0012), 2.04 (1.04–4.02, p = 0.0390) and 2.84 (1.23–6.59, p = 0.0150), respectively.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing major lung cancer resections, multiple independent risk factors for perioperative ABT apart from preoperative anemia and multilobar resections were identified. Assessment of these predictors might help to identify high risk patients preoperatively and to improve the strategies that reduce perioperative ABT.

Large volume acute normovolemic hemodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with intermediate-high risk of transfusion: A randomized controlled trial

Study Objective: To investigate whether large volume acute normovolemic hemodilution (L-ANH), compared with moderate acute normovolemic hemodilution (M-ANH), can reduce perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in patients with intermediate-high risk of transfusion during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.Setting: University hospital.Patients: Patients with transfusion risk understanding scoring tool (“TRUST”) ≥2 points undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from May 2020 to January 2021 were included.Interventions: The patients were randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to M-ANH (5 to 8 mL/kg) or L-ANH (12 to 15 mL/kg).Measurements: The primary outcome was perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion units. The composite outcome included new-onset atrial fibrillation, pulmonary infection, cardiac surgery associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) class ≥2, surgical incision infection, postoperative excessive bleeding, and resternotomy. Main results: Total 159 patients were screened and 110 (55 L-ANH and 55 M-ANH) were included for final analysis. Removed blood volume of L-ANH is significantly higher than M-ANH (886 ± 152 vs. 395 ± 86 mL, P < 0.001). Perioperative RBC transfusion was median 0 unit ([25th, 75th] percentiles: 0–4.4) in M-ANH group vs. 0 unit ([25th, 75th] percentiles: 0–2.0) in L-ANH group (P = 0.012) and L-ANH was associated with lower incidence of transfusion (23.6% vs. 41.8%, P = 0.042, rate difference: 0.182, 95% confidence interval [0.007–0.343]). The incidence of postoperative excessive bleeding was significantly lower in L-ANH vs. M-ANH (3.6% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.029, rate difference: 0.146, 95% confidence interval [0.027–0.270]) without significant difference for other second outcomes. The volume of ANH was inversely related to perioperative RBC transfusion units (Spearman r = −0.483, 95% confidence interval [−0.708 to −0.168], P = 0.003), and L-ANH in cardiac surgery was associated with a significantly reduced risk of perioperative RBC transfusion (odds ratio: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.19–0.98, P = 0.044).Conclusions: Compared with M-ANH, L-ANH during cardiac surgery inclined to be associated with reduced perioperative RBC transfusion and the volume of RBC transfusion was inversely proportional to the volume of ANH. In addition, LANH during cardiac surgery was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative excessive bleeding.

Predisposing factors for allogeneic blood transfusion in patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe transfusion rate is relatively high in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, relevant studies focusing on the predisposing factors for transfusion with a large sample size are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for allogeneic blood transfusion in patients with AS undergoing primary unilateral THA.MethodsThis retrospective study included 331 patients with AS who underwent primary unilateral THA between 2011 and 2021. Relevant parameters were collected through a chart review. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify possible factors associated with perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion.ResultsA total of 113 (34.1%) patients received perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions. Factors related to receiving an allogeneic blood transfusion included prolonged operative duration (odds ratio [OR] per 10 min = 1.139, P = 0.047), increased estimated intraoperative blood loss (OR per 100 mL = 1.348, P < 0.001), and increased postoperative drainage volume (OR per 100 mL = 1.235, P = 0.024). A higher body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.914, P = 0.012), perioperative tranexamic acid (TXA) use (OR = 0.166, P < 0.001), and a higher preoperative hemoglobin level (OR per 1 g/dL = 0.744, P = 0.004) decreased the risk of transfusion.ConclusionsIn patients with AS undergoing THA, prolonged operative duration, increased estimated intraoperative blood loss, and increased postoperative drainage volume were found to be risk factors for transfusion, whereas a higher BMI, perioperative TXA use, and a higher preoperative hemoglobin level were protective factors. These results may aid in developing a better perioperative management strategy, ultimately reducing the need for transfusion.

Machine learning-based prediction of massive perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in cardiac surgery.

Massive perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion, that is, perioperative transfusion of more than 10 units of packed red blood cells (pRBC), is one of the main contributors to perioperative morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery. Prediction of perioperative blood transfusion might enable preemptive treatment strategies to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes while reducing resource utilisation. We, therefore, investigated the precision of five different machine learning algorithms to predict the occurrence of massive perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in cardiac surgery at our centre. Is it possible to predict massive perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion using machine learning? Retrospective, observational study. Single adult cardiac surgery centre in Austria between 01 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Primary outcome measures were the number of patients receiving at least 10 units pRBC, the area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristics curve, the F1 score, and the negative-predictive (NPV) and positive-predictive values (PPV) of the five machine learning algorithms used to predict massive perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. A total of 3782 (1124 female:) patients were enrolled and 139 received at least 10 pRBC units. Using all features available at hospital admission, massive perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion could be excluded rather accurately. The best area under the curve was achieved by Random Forests: 0.810 (0.76 to 0.86) with high NPV of 0.99). This was still true using only the eight most important features [area under the curve 0.800 (0.75 to 0.85)]. Machine learning models may provide clinical decision support as to which patients to focus on for perioperative preventive treatment in order to preemptively reduce massive perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion by predicting, which patients are not at risk. Johannes Kepler University Ethics Committee Study Number 1091/2021, Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04856618.

Acute normovolemic hemodilution reduced the frequency and amount of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in pediatric and adolescent scoliosis surgery: a retrospective observational study.

The aim of the present study is to investigate whether acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) can reduce the frequency and amount of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) (intraoperative ABT and postoperative ABT until discharge from the hospital) in pediatric and adolescent scoliosis surgery. This single-center, retrospective, observational study included the perioperative data of 147 patients who were 18years old or younger and underwent scoliosis surgery. Patients were divided into groups according to whether they received ANH: i.e., an ANH group and control group. Propensity-score-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether ANH can reduce the frequency of perioperative ABT. A total of 125 patients were analyzed, 95 and 30 in the ANH and control group, respectively. The intraoperative/postoperative ABT frequency was significantly lower in the ANH group than in the control group (17.9% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.044). The amount of ABT [median (IQR): 0 (0, 0) mL/kg vs. 0 (0, 16.3) mL/kg, p = 0.033] was also significantly lower in the ANH group than in the control group. Propensity-score-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that ANH use [odds ratio: 0.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.03, 0.77; p = 0.023)] was associated with a lower risk of ABT after adjusting for intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery. ANH use can reduce the frequency and amount of perioperative ABT in pediatric and adolescent scoliosis surgery.