Performing Propensity Score Matching Research Articles

Right subaxillary small incision on low-age and low-weight infants with congenital heart disease.

As a minimally invasive approach to treating congenital heart disease (CHD), the application of the right subaxillary small incision (RSSI) has been developing fast in its indication spectrum. However, RSSI's use is still quite challenging for the surgical treatment of the low-age and low-weight infant patient group. To investigate the safety and efficacy of performing RSSI surgery, treating CHD for infants with low-age and low-weight. Between March 2010 and April 2023, Low-age (≤6 months) and low-weight (≤5 kg) infants with ventricular or atrial septal defect (ASD) as the main diagnosis were retrospectively included in this study. The infants were divided into the RSSI group and the median sternotomy (MS) group. Preoperative conditions, general surgical conditions, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, and long-term follow-up results were compared between the 2 groups. The study included 783 cases. Of these, 434 were operated with MS, and 349 were operated with RSSI. A1:1 matched MS group (282 cases) and RSSI group (282 cases) were obtained after performing propensity score matching (PSM). Analysis of the 2 groups after PSM showed the differences in residual ASD/VSD, peak airway pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen/partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) before return to the intensive care unit (ICU) and extubation were not statistically significant between groups, whereas mechanical ventilation time (P < 0.001), ICU stay (P < 0.001), and hospitalization time (P < 0.001) were lower in RSSI group; and the differences in perioperative complication outcomes were not statistically significant. Long-term outcomes revealed the rate of thoracic deformity was higher in the MS group. Based on the appropriate selection of patients, compared with MS, RSSI surgery for the treatment of low-age (≤6 months) and low-weight (≤5 kg) infants with CHD yields favorable therapeutic results without increasing surgical risks and causes less trauma, which deserves to be further promoted and applied.

Vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign ovarian cysts is safe and feasible in same-day discharge: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundAdvances in minimally invasive surgery and the development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) have favored the spread of day-surgery programs. Even though Vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is accepted as an innovative treatment for benign ovarian cysts that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide, the safety and feasibility of same-day surgery (SDS) have yet to be established.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of day surgery compared to inpatient surgery of patients undergoing vNOTES for benign ovarian cysts by determining perioperative outcomes.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of 213 patients who underwent vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy at a single institution from January 2020 to November 2022. Based on the hospital stay, patients were classified into the same-day surgery group (SDSG) and the inpatient surgery group (ISG); after data processing and screening considering the balance of the two groups, SDSG has 83 samples(n = 83), and ISG has 113 samples(n = 113). The patient’s demographic characteristics and follow-up data were collected during the perioperative period by doctors and nurses for medical tracking and analysis purposes and 1-month postoperatively by doctors in charge of their operation. Independent sample t-tests were performed to verify if there was any major difference between these two groups for continuous data like age, BMI, and cyst diameter, and Pearson’s chi-squared tests were used to test whether there was a major difference between these two groups for categorical data like cyst count, abdominal surgery history and whether their cyst is bilateral ovarian cysts or not. The association between exhaust time and postoperative characteristics and the association between levels of pain and postoperative characteristics were further analyzed to unveil the confounding factors contributing to the same-day discharge method’s quick recovery nature.ResultsUpon performing propensity score matching, 196 patients were finally enrolled in this study for the matched comparison, including 83(42.3%) patients in the SDSG and 113(57.7%) patients in the ISG. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of duration of operation (85.0 ± 41.5 min vs. 80.5 ± 33.5 min), estimated blood loss (27.7 ± 28.0 ml vs. 36.3 ± 33.2 ml), preoperative hemoglobin levels (128.8 ± 13.2 g/L vs. 128.6 ± 14.0 g/L), postoperative hemoglobin difference at 24 h (16.5 ± 15.4 g/L vs. 19.3 ± 9.1 g/L), pelvic adhesions (42 (50.6%) vs. 47 (41.6%)), and postoperative complications (7(8.4%) vs. 4(3.5%)). The SDSG group showed less time of feeding/off-bed/exhaust/urination after surgery, shorter hospitalization duration, a lower postoperative 6-hour pain score, and a lower incidence of analgesic drug use. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that advancing the time of postoperative off-bed activity and feeding reduced the postoperative exhaust time by 0.34 (95% CI: 0.185–0.496, 0.34 h, p < 0.001) and 0.299(95% CI: 0.158–0.443, 0.229 h, p = 0.036) hours. In addition, Ordinal logistic regression revealed a correlation between pain scores and bilaterality of cyst, increasing about 25.98 times the risk of pain levels when ovarian cysts are bilateral (OR: 26.98, 95% CI: 1.071–679.859, P = 0.045).ConclusionIn this pilot study, same-day discharge after vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic ovarian cystectomy is safe and feasible. The vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy combined with the same-day discharge shorten the exhaust time and duration of hospitalization, reduce postoperative pain, and lower the use incidence of analgesic drugs.

Strategy for an early simultaneous introduction of four-pillars of heart failure therapy: results from a single center experience.

The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines recommend the use of four different classes of drugs for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): beta blockers (BB), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Moreover, the 2023 ESC updated Guidelines suggest an intensive strategy of initiation and rapid up-titration of evidence-based treatment before discharge, based on trials not using the four-pillars. We hypothesized that an early concomitantly administration and up-titration of four-pillars, compared with a conventional stepwise approach, may impact the vulnerable phase after hospitalization owing to HF. This prospective, single center, observational study included consecutive in-hospital patients with HFrEF. After performing propensity score matching, they were divided according to treatment strategy into group 1 (G1), with predischarge start of all four-pillars, with their up-titration within 1 month, and group 2 (G2) with the pre Guidelines update stepwise four-pillars introduction. HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) death, and the composite of both were evaluated between the two groups at 6-month follow-up. The study included a total of 278 patients who completed 6-month follow-up (139 for both groups). There were no differences in terms of baseline features between the two groups. At survival analysis, HF hospitalization risk was significantly lower in G1 compared with G2 (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed regarding CV death (p = 0.642) or the composite of CV death and HF hospitalization (p = 0.135). In our real-world population, patients with HF treated with a predischarge and simultaneous use of four-pillars showed a reduced risk of HF hospitalizationduring the vulnerable phase after discharge, compared with a conventional stepwise approach.

Primary Tumor Sidedness Associated with Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Outcomes in Colon Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Background: Recent investigations have suggested that-sidedness is associated with the prognosis of colon cancer patients. However, the role of sidedness in surgical outcome is unclear. In this study, we tried to demonstrate the real role of sidedness in postoperative results for colon cancer patients receiving surgical intervention. Methods: This is a propensity score matching study using the database of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2009 to 2013. Sidedness groups including right-sided and left-sided colon cancer were created according to the associated diagnosis and procedure codes. Postoperative 30-day mortality, morbidity, overall complications, and total length of hospital stay were analyzed after performing propensity score matching. Results: Out of a total of 24,436 colon cancer patients who received associated operations, 15,945 patients had right-sided cancer and 8941 patients had left-sided cancer. Right-sided colon cancer patients were accompanied by more preoperative comorbidities including old age, female sex, hypertension, dyspnea, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (SMD > 0.1). Postoperative mortality, morbidities including re-intubation, bleeding, urinary tract infection and deep vein thrombosis, postoperative overall complications, and total length of hospital stay were significantly associated with right-sided cancer (p < 0.05). After 1:1 propensity score matching, postoperative mortality was not significantly different between right-sided cancer (2.3%) and left-sided cancer (2.4%) patients. The patients with left-sided colon cancer had significantly more postoperative morbidities, more overall complications, and longer total length of hospital stay. Conclusions: Poor clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes were noted in right-sided cancer patients. After propensity score matching, left-sided cancer patients had worse postoperative outcomes than those with right-sided cancer.

Prognostic impact of limited resection vs. inadequate adjuvant therapy in patients with pathologic stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer: results from the Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry.

For patients with stage II and III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), various multi-modality treatments are required. However, depending on the individual conditions of patients, there will be a significant difference in prognosis. Therefore, this study investigated the clinical impact of inadequate treatment (limited surgery and inadequate adjuvant therapy) in patients with NSCLC stage II or III using data from the Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry (KALC-R) between 2014 and 2016. Of the 8,110 new lung cancer cases registered at the Korea Central Cancer Registry in 2014-2016, 721 patients with stage II or III NSCLC were selected and divided into three groups according to differences in cancer treatment methods. In group A, patients underwent standard surgery and completed adjuvant therapy. In group B, patients underwent standard surgery without completing adjuvant therapy. In group C, patients received adjuvant therapy after limited surgery. After performing propensity score matching (PSM) for selected patients, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the three groups of patients with stage II and III NSCLC patients were then compared. Of the 721 patients with NSCLC, 239, 437, and 45 belonged to groups A, B, and C, respectively. After 1:3 PS matching for groups B and C, the 5-year survival rate of patients with stage II or III NSCLC were 68.0% and 26.7% for groups B and C, respectively and the DFS rate was 59.1% and 16.2% for groups B and C, respectively. The therapeutic effect of the standard surgery was the best. Although patients received adjuvant therapy, limited resection resulted in a poorer prognosis in compromised patients compared with omitting adjuvant therapy followed by standard surgery. Thus, surgical treatment should be considered in patients who are unable to complete surgical and adjuvant therapy.

Abstract 59: Contemporarypre-Stroke Antiplatelet Use and the Risk of Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation After Intravenous Thrombolysis

Introduction: Many patients are taking antiplatelet medications when an acute stroke occurs. We evaluated the risk of hemorrhage associated with newer, more potent antiplatelet medications and dual antiplatelet regimens among patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA). Methods: Using the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry from January 1, 2013 to December, 31 2021, we analyzed data on all ischemic stroke patients hospitalized and treated with IV-tPA. The exposure of interest was pre-stroke antiplatelet use categorized as none, single (SAPT), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The primary outcome of interest was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours of tPA administration. A secondary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge. Propensity score matching was performed to mitigate confounding by indication for each pre-stroke antiplatelet treatment strategy. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between pre-stroke antiplatelet medication and outcomes of interest. Results: The analytic cohort included 320,493 patients who had an acute ischemic stroke and received IV-tPA. The pre-stroke antiplatelet therapy utilization frequencies were 56.9% no antiplatelet, 36.7% SAPT, and 6.4% DAPT. The frequency of sICH was 2.9%, 3.8%, and 4.1% among patients treated with none, SAPT, and DAPT respectively (p&lt;0.001). After performing propensity score matching, both SAPT (OR 1.13, 95% C.I. 1.08-1.20) and DAPT (OR 1.28, 95% C.I. 1.14-1.43) were associated with increased risks of sICH. DAPT was also associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH compared with SAPT (OR 1.18, 95% C.I. 1.08-1.28). Use of pre-stroke antiplatelet medications was associated with lower odds of discharge mRS &lt; 2 compared to none: (SAPT OR 0.92, 95% C.I. 0.89-0.96; DAPT OR 0.93, 95% C.I. 0.87-0.98). Conclusion: In this study, pre-stroke antiplatelet use was associated with a modest, dose-dependent risk of sICH and functional dependence.

The influence of board interlocks and sustainability experience on transparent sustainability disclosure

AbstractWe investigate board interlocks and their relationship to the transparency of sustainability disclosure, drawing on the theoretical perspectives of resource dependence theory and agency theory. We ascertain that board members who gain sustainability experience by serving on another board will influence the transparency of sustainability disclosure for the focal firm. The study analyzes data from S&amp;P 1500 firms in the U.S. from 2009 to 2018, using ordinary least squares regressions. Our findings demonstrate that the focal firms' sustainability disclosure will be more transparent if their boards have interlocking directors with experience gained from other boards in current or prior years. Furthermore, we find that the sustainability experience of interlocked firms interacts with both gender diversity and board independence, leading to an enhancement in the transparency of sustainability disclosure. In addition, we conduct robustness tests such as performing propensity score matching, controlling for firm fixed effects, and applying entropy matching. These additional tests provide consistent results to confirm and strengthen our findings.

Assessing the impact of transfusion thresholds in patients with septic acute kidney injury: a retrospective study.

Sepsis is a severe condition that often leads to complications such as acute kidney injury, which significantly increases morbidity and mortality rates. Septic AKI (S-AKI) is common in ICU patients and is associated with poor outcomes. However, there is no consensus on the optimal transfusion threshold for achieving the best clinical results. This retrospective study aims to investigate the relationship between different transfusion thresholds during hospitalization and the prognosis of septic AKI. Data from patients with S-AKI was extracted from MIMIC-IV. Based on the lowest hemoglobin level 24 h before transfusion, patients were divided into high-threshold (≥7 g/L) and low-threshold (<7 g/L) groups. We compared the outcomes between these two groups, including hospital and ICU mortality rates as primary outcomes, and 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days mortality rates, as well as duration of stay in ICU and hospital as secondary outcomes. A total of 5,654 patients were included in our study. Baseline characteristics differed significantly between the two groups, with patients in the low-threshold group generally being younger and having higher SOFA scores. After performing propensity score matching, no significant differences in survival rates were found between the groups. However, patients in the low-threshold group had a longer overall hospital stay. A lower transfusion threshold does not impact the mortality rate in S-AKI patients, but it may lead to a longer hospital stay.

Predicting metastasis at initial diagnosis and radiotherapy effectiveness in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma.

Osteosarcoma is a primary malignant bone tumor affecting mostly children and adolescents. The overall 10year survivals of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma are typically less than 20% in the literature and remain concerning. We aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the risk of metastasis at initial diagnosis in patients with osteosarcoma and evaluate the effectiveness of radiotherapy in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma. Clinical and demographic data of patients with osteosarcoma were collected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. We randomly split our analytical sample into the training and validation cohorts, then established and validated a nomogram for predicting the risk of osteosarcoma metastasis at initial diagnosis. The effectiveness of radiotherapy was evaluated by performing propensity score matching in patients underwent surgery + chemotherapy and those underwent surgery + chemotherapy + radiotherapy, among patients with metastatic osteosarcoma. 1439 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. 343 of 1439 had osteosarcoma metastasis by the time of initial presentation. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of osteosarcoma metastasis by the time of initial presentation was developed. In both unmatched and matched samples, the radiotherapy group demonstrated a superior survival profile comparing with the non-radiotherapy group. Our study established a novel nomogram to evaluate the risk of osteosarcoma with metastasis, and demonstrated that radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and surgical resection could improve 10-year survival in patients with metastasis. These findings may guide the clinical decision-making for orthopedic surgeons.

Differential impacts of initial treatment status on long-term survival in patients with sarcomas treated in a referral center according to histologic type and anatomic site

ObjectiveThe aim of this work was to estimate the magnitude of the differential impacts of initial treatment status relative to the impact of classic clinicopathologic factors on the long-term overall survival (OS) of sarcoma patients in a referral cancer center. MethodsFrom the institutional database, we identified 2185 patients who presented to the institutional multidisciplinary team (MDT) prior to (N = 717, 32.8%) or after (N = 1468, 67.2%) initial treatment, with a first diagnosis of sarcoma from January 1999 to December 2018. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify the factors related to OS. By performing propensity score matching of each completely MDT-treated patient to a referral patient with similar characteristics, the differential impacts of the identified risk and prognostic factors on OS in the 2 groups were estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier survival curves, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression; the results were compared using calibrated nomograph models and forest plots. ResultsAdjusted for the clinicopathologic factors of patient age, sex, primary site, tumor grade, tumor size, resection margin and histology, hazard ratio-based modeling analysis indicated that the initial treatment status was an independent but intermediate prognostic factor associated with long-term OS. The major impacts of the initial and comprehensive MDT-based management on significant improvement of the 20-year OS of sarcomas were reflected in the subgroup of patients with stromal, undifferentiated pleomorphic, fibromatous, fibroepithelial, or synovial neoplasms and tumors in the breast, gastrointestinal tract, or soft tissues of limb and trunk. ConclusionsThis retrospective study supports early referral of patients with soft tissue masses of unknown identity to a specialized MDT before biopsy and initial resection to reduce the risk of death but highlights an unmet need for a greater understanding of some of the most difficult sarcoma subtypes and subsites and their management.

Physiology-guided PCI versus CABG for left main coronary artery disease: insights from the DEFINE-LM registry

There have been no studies comparing clinical outcomes of physiology-guided revascularization in patients with unprotected left main coronary disease (ULMD) between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG of patients with physiologically significant ULMD. From an international multicenter registry of ULMD patients interrogated with instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), we analyzed data from 151 patients (85 PCI vs. 66 CABG) who underwent revascularization according to the cutoff value of iFR ≤ 0.89. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for baseline clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint. Mean age was 66.6 (± 9.2) years, 79.2% male. Mean SYNTAX score was 22.6 (± 8.4) and median iFR was 0.83 (IQR 0.74–0.87). After performing propensity score matching analysis, 48 patients treated with CABG were matched to those who underwent PCI. At a median follow-up period of 2.8 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.3% in PCI group and 20.8% in CABG group, respectively (HR 3.80; 95% CI 1.04–13.9; p = 0.043). There was no difference in each component of the primary event (p > 0.05 for all). Within the present study, iFR-guided PCI was associated with lower cardiovascular events rate in patients with ULMD and intermediate SYNTAX score, as compared to CABG.Graphical abstractState-of-the-art PCI vs. CABG for ULMD. Study design and primary endpoint in patients with physiologically significant ULMD. MACE was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. The blue line denotes the PCI arm, and the red line denotes the CABG arm. PCI was associated with significantly lower risk of MACE than CABG. CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; iFR: instantaneous wave-free ratio; MACE: major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; ULMD: unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Impact of surgical resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients with initially diagnosed synchronous hepatic metastases on long-term survival outcomes.

The effect of surgical resection on the long-term outcome of GIST patients with initially diagnosed synchronous hepatic metastases in the targeted therapy era is still uncertain. The main aims of this study were to investigate the role of surgery in the treatment of these patients and establish clinical predictive models for assessing prognosis. We identified these patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2018. The selection bias in comparisons was minimized by performing propensity score matching (PSM). The risk factors associated with long-term survival outcomes were identified by a Cox proportional hazards model and thus used to establish the nomograms. Nomograms were validated by concordance indexes (C-indexes), time-dependent receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analyses (DCA). Of these 523 eligible patients, there were 187 (35.8%) and 336 (64.2%) patients in the surgical and nonsurgical groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical resection was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.88, p=0.0068) and CSS (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33 - 0.77, p=0.0016). After PSM, it was found that surgical resection still showed significantly improved OS (5-year 54.9% vs 38.8%, p=0.028) and CSS (5-year 65.8% vs 50.3%, p=0.077). In addition, the C-indexes of the nomograms for OS and CSS prediction were 0.692 and 0.705, respectively, and the nomograms showed good consistency. This study revealed that surgical resection has a favorable impact on the long-term outcome of patients with synchronous GIST liver metastases, and the nomograms showed remarkable prediction performance for OS and CSS.

Efficacy and Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid in Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis.

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of glycyrrhizic acid preparation and hormone treatment in patients with autoimmune hepatitis, we enrolled 377 patients in a study that lasted from January 2009 to January 2020. After performing propensity score matching, we included 58 patients in the hormone group and 58 in the glycyrrhizic acid preparation group in statistical analysis. We then compared the ratio of sustained biochemical responses at 48 weeks after treatment. Adverse events, including some incidence of decompensated liver cirrhosis and liver cancer, were evaluated. The results showed that a total of 61.8% of treated patients achieved complete biochemical remission. The cumulative biochemical remission rate in the hormone group and glycyrrhizic acid preparation group showed no significant difference (62.3% vs. 60.7%, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). At the end of follow-up, the total bile acid in the hormone group was significantly higher than that in the glycyrrhizic acid preparation group (8.9[Formula: see text][Formula: see text]mol/L vs. 5.6[Formula: see text][Formula: see text]mol/L, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The incidence of adverse reactions in the hormone group was significantly higher than that in the glycyrrhizic acid preparation group (31.03% vs. 15.52%, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). In conclusion, compared with the hormone treatment, glycyrrhizic acid preparation might be a safe and effective treatment for autoimmune hepatitis.

The Impact of Different Antihypertensive Drugs on Cardiovascular Risk in Isolated Systolic Hypertension with Type 2 Diabetes Patients.

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), calcium channel blocker (CCB) and thiazide diuretics (TD) are common antihypertensive drugs for diabetes patients with hypertension. The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiovascular risks of these drugs in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We used Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial data to explore the relationship between antihypertensive drugs and cardiovascular risks in ISH with T2DM patients by performing propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional regression. The cumulative incidence rates of primary outcomes (PO, including cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke) in the ARB use group were significantly lower than those without (hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.83; p = 0.006). However, for ACEI, CCB and TD, they were negligible (ACEI: p = 0.209; CCB: p = 0.245; TD: p = 0.438). ARB decreased cardiovascular mortality (CM) in PO rather than non-fatal myocardial infarction (NMI) and non-fatal stroke (NST) (CM: HR 0.32; 95%CI 0.18-0.90; p = 0.004; NMI: p = 0.692; NST: p = 0.933). ARB may alleviate the cardiovascular risks in ISH with T2DM patients, but ACEI, CCB, and TD did not.

Association of paternal cadmium and other heavy metal exposure to birth outcomes using propensity score matching.

BackgroundHuman exposure to cadmium has various effects on health, especially on male reproductive organs. Although it is widely known that prenatal maternal cadmium exposure can affect birth outcomes, the effect of paternal exposure to cadmium remains unclear. ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of paternal cadmium exposure on fetal growth by considering maternal cadmium exposure and exposure to other heavy metals, namely mercury and lead. MethodsThe Mothers and Children's Environmental Health (MOCEH) study is a prospective birth cohort study in Korea. Overall, 1313 families (father-mother-child triple) without child abnormalities and who completed paternal whole blood cadmium assessments were included in this study. Families were divided into two subgroups based on the blood sampling periods, namely early and late pregnancy. Subjects were selected as follows: one family triple with a high level of paternal cadmium and two triples with low levels of paternal cadmium, using the method of propensity score matching. And linear regression analyses were performed. ResultsThe group with high paternal cadmium exposure (80% or more; 1.93 μg/L) had lower birth weight infants compared to the group with low cadmium concentrations (β(se) = −0.21(0.10); p-value = 0.0283). After stratification by infant sex, prenatal paternal cadmium exposure significantly reduced the birth weight of females in subgroups of different sampling times, namely early pregnancy (β(se) = −0.52 (0.22); p-value = 0.0170) and late pregnancy (β(se) = −0.43 (0.18); p-value = 0.0160). Finally, after performing propensity score matching in the early pregnancy measurement group, it was found that the prenatal exposure of father to cadmium significantly reduced birth weight in females (β(se) = −0.72(0.25); p-value = 0.0047). ConclusionThis study assessed the effect of paternal cadmium exposure on birth outcomes in family units consisting of a father, mother, and child. Prenatal paternal cadmium exposure negatively affected birth weight, especially that of female, considering covariates and other heavy metals exposure, namely mercury and lead.

Postoperative radiotherapy might be a risk factor for second primary lung cancer: A population-based study.

BackgroundSurgery is the main curative therapeutic strategy for patients with initial primary lung cancer (IPLC). Most international guidelines recommend regular follow-ups after discharge to monitor patients for tumor recurrence and metastasis. As the overall survival (OS) in patients with lung cancer improves, their risk of secondary primary lung cancer (SPLC) increases. Previous studies on such patients lack separate assessment of different survival outcomes and evaluation of high-risk factors for SPLC. Therefore, we aimed to determine the correlation between high-risk factors and causes of death in patients with SPLC, based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsWe screened the SEER database for patients with IPLC and SPLC from 2004 to 2015 and included only patients who underwent surgery since the IPLC and in whom the cancer was pathologically verified of an International Classification of Diseases grade of 0-3 and to be non-small-cell lung cancer. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated between variables and SPLC. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were conducted to calculate the correlation of different variables with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A competing-risk model was conducted for SPLC. The effect of baseline bias on survival outcomes by performing propensity score matching analysis in a 1: 6 ratio (SPLC: IPLC).ResultsFor patients aged 0-49 years, the overall SIR was higher in older patients, reaching a maximum of 27.74 in those aged 40-49 years, and at 11.63 in patients aged 50-59 years. The overall SIR was higher for patients who were more recently diagnosed with IPLC and increased with time after diagnosis. Male sex, SPLC (hazard ratio, 1.6173; 95% confidence interval, 1.5505-1.6869; P < 0.001), cancer grade III or IV, lower lobe of the lung, advanced stage and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) were independently detrimental to OS. In terms of CSS, PORT was a high-risk factor.ConclusionsPostoperative radiotherapy is a risk factor for second primary lung cancer and detrimental to overall and cancer-specific survival in patients who had initial primary lung cancer. These data support the need for life-long follow-up of patients who undergo treatment for IPLC to screen for SPLC.

Effect of congestive heart failure on safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the influence of congestive heart failure (CHF) on safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Methods A total of 401 patients who consecutively underwent LAAC with Watchman and LAmbre devices were divided into CHF (85 cases) and non-CHF (316 cases) groups. Comparisons between groups were performed against data. Results No significant differences were found in implantation success and periprocedural complication rates between the two groups. During a mean 2.2 years of follow-up, the incidence rate of thromboembolism, major bleeding, device-related thrombus, and non-cardiovascular death was comparable. However, patients with CHF had significantly increased risk of all-cause death (P = 0.015), cardiovascular death (P = 0.014), and combined efficacy endpoints (P = 0.02). After performing propensity score matching, the risk of all-cause death (P = 0.01), cardiovascular death (P = 0.01), and combined efficacy endpoints (P = 0.006) was still higher. The logistic regression analyses identified CHF (OR: 3.642, 95% CI: 1.296–10.232, P = 0.014) as an independent predictor of cardiovascular death. Conclusions Implantation of atrial appendage occluder is effective and safe in NVAF patients with CHF. The increased risk of mortality and combined efficacy endpoints in patients with CHF versus non-CHF after LAAC may be associated with the high risk of CHF itself.

The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on oncological outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma with only intermediate-risk factors: a propensity score matching analysis

We aimed to evaluate whether adjuvant radiotherapy had a survival benefit for patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma with intermediate-risk factors. This study included patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy according to Wertheim–Okabayashi for stage IB1-IIA2 cervical carcinoma. Each patient had at least one intermediate-risk factor including tumour diameter ≥4 cm, deep stromal invasion, and positive lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Patients with lymph node metastasis, parametrial invasion, and positive surgical margins according to the final paraffin section were excluded. In total, 183 patients were included. Seventy-three (39.9%) patients had one, 85 (46.4%) had two, and 25 (13.7%) had three intermediate risk factors. Sixty-seven (36.6%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of stage, LVSI, and endometrial/uterine invasion between the groups that did and did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (p = .024, p = .018, and p = .001, respectively). These two groups were homogenised by performing propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. In the new matched cohort (n = 134), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 89.5% in the group that received adjuvant radiotherapy and 82% in the group that did not (HR: 0.484, 95% CI: [0.171–1.369]; p = .171). Also, receiving adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with an improvement in oncologic outcomes in patients with one, two, or more intermediate risk factors. In univariate analysis, none of the risk factors was associated with DFS. In conclusion, adjuvant radiotherapy had no favourable effect on survival outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma with only intermediate risk factors. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in cervical carcinoma is accepted as the standard of care when high-risk factors – positive surgical margins, lymph node metastasis, and parametrial involvement – are found in the surgical specimen. However, the necessity of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk factors – deep stromal invasion, positive LVSI, tumour diameter ≥4 cm – is controversial. What do the results of this study add? We compared patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy and those who did not. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of oncologic outcomes. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of pelvic and extrapelvic recurrence rates. The number of positive intermediate-risk factors did not affect survival. Moreover, age, tumour type, stage, number of removed lymph nodes, grade, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and endometrial/uterine invasion were not associated with DFS among patients with stage IB–IIA cervical carcinoma with only intermediate-risk factors. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Debate remains over the prognostic factors and the adjuvant treatment options in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma who possess intermediate-risk factors. Adjuvant radiotherapy can be ignored if initial adequate surgery has been performed in this patient group.

Post COVID-19 condition of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2

ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence of post coronavirus disease (COVID-19) condition of the Omicron variant in comparison to other strains. Study designA single-center cross-sectional study. MethodsPatients who recovered from Omicron COVID-19 infection (Omicron group) were interviewed via telephone, and patients infected with other strains (control group) were surveyed via a self-reporting questionnaire. Data on patients’ characteristics, information regarding the acute-phase COVID-19, as well as presence and duration of COVID-19-related symptoms were obtained. Post COVID-19 condition in this study was defined as a symptom that lasted for at least 2 months, within 3 months of COVID-19 onset. We investigated and compared the prevalence of post COVID-19 condition in both groups after performing propensity score matching. ResultsWe conducted interviews for 53 out of 128 patients with Omicron and obtained 502 responses in the control group. After matching cases with controls, 18 patients from both groups had improved covariate balance of the factors: older adult, female sex, obesity, and vaccination status. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of each post COVID-19 condition between the two groups. The number of patients with at least one post COVID-19 condition in the Omicron and control groups were 1 (5.6%) and 10 (55.6%) (p = 0.003), respectively. ConclusionsThe prevalence of post Omicron COVID-19 conditions was less than that of the other strains. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to investigate the precise epidemiology of post COVID-19 condition of Omicron, and its impact on health-related quality of life and social productivity.

Dexamethasone Treatment in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

During the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which was caused by the novel coronavirus, there is an ongoing controversy about the use of corticosteroids. This study aims to investigate the association between Dexamethasone treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with COVID-19 were enrolled from February 16, 2020, to November 1, 2020. After performing propensity score matching with age, sex, and disease severity. The independent effect of Dexamethasone treatment on in-hospital mortality was evaluated by multivariate proportional hazards regression models. Of 1413 patients with COVID-19 diagnosis, 1172 patients entered the final analysis. 473(40.4%) patients received dexamethasone treatment with a median duration of 6.0[4.0-9.0] days. After matching and adjustment with possible confounders in the multivariate model, administration of dexamethasone significantly increased the survival in severe patients (hazard ratio: 0.25, 95 confidence intervals: 0.16-0.38, P&lt;0.001), but there was no difference in non-severe patients (P:0.888). The administering of dexamethasone was associated with an increased in-hospital survival rate (HR: 0.25 [0.16-0.38]) in severe COVID-19 patients. The survival rate was more significant in severe patients with diabetes mellitus or hypertension after receiving dexamethasone treatment (HR:0.19). On the other hand, patients without severe disease did not benefit from dexamethasone administration.