Establishing energy storage systems can provide an effective solution to the challenges posed by the variability and intermittency of renewable energy sources. Among the available options for energy storage, rock-packed bed thermal energy storage systems are widely favored for their performance, cost-effectiveness, and reliability. The more compact the rock packing, the more adequate the heat exchange of the system; however, poorer permeability increases fluid friction losses and pressure drop, which is detrimental to heat transport within the system. The permeability and heat exchange of the system jointly determines its thermal energy storage performance. This study proposes a composite packing scheme utilizing intact rock slabs and broken rock to enhance the thermal energy storage performance of the packed bed. This approach aims to augment heat exchange efficiency and elevate energy storage density while maintaining the bed's commendable permeability. Heat injection and heat extraction experiments of rock beds were conducted to study the heat storage characteristics of the rock-packed bed thermal storage system under different packing structure. In addition, this study investigates the effect of different injection pressures on the storage and release of heat in the system. The results show that the volume of the pore space of the filled bed, serving as the primary domain for gas flow and gas-rock heat exchange, is a decisive factor affecting the packed bed's permeability and heat exchange performance. When the porosity of the packed bed increased from 5.5 % to 9.9 %, its permeability increased from 1.42 × 10−13 m2 to 3.20 × 10−13 m2, yet the thermal exchange efficiency declined from 67.2 % to 65.3 %. Reasonably arranging intact rock slabs and broken rock fill can alter the path of heat transfer within the packed bed, thereby effectively enhancing its heat storage and release performance. For the same pore volume conditions, the heat exchange efficiency of the packed bed is increased by about 10 % by increasing the number of layers of broken rock fill. Additionally, high gas injection pressures can facilitate heat storage and release processes, but it does not mean that this is more efficient. The research findings can guide the selection of packing and injection schemes in packed bed thermal energy storage systems.
Read full abstract