Pose Prediction Performance Research Articles

PheSA: An Open-Source Tool for Pharmacophore-Enhanced Shape Alignment.

PheSA is an open-source pharmacophore- and shape-based screening and molecular alignment tool that is fully open-source as part of OpenChemLib. Supporting standard ligand-based screening, flexible refinement of alignments, and receptor-guided shape docking, PheSA is a very flexible tool and can be used for different use cases in structure-based drug design. We present the algorithm and different benchmark studies that investigate the screening performance and also the quality of the generated alignments and the pose prediction performance of the receptor-guided PheSA algorithm. An important finding is the effect of the type of similarity metric used for measuring screening enrichment (symmetric Tanimoto versus asymmetric Tversky), whereby we could observe improved enrichment rates by using Tversky. PheSA exhibits enrichments on the DUD-E that are on par with commercial methods.

Open-ComBind: harnessing unlabeled data for improved binding pose prediction

Determination of the bound pose of a ligand is a critical first step in many in silico drug discovery tasks. Molecular docking is the main tool for the prediction of non-covalent binding of a protein and ligand system. Molecular docking pipelines often only utilize the information of one ligand binding to the protein despite the commonly held hypothesis that different ligands share binding interactions when bound to the same receptor. Here we describe Open-ComBind, an easy-to-use, open-source version of the ComBind molecular docking pipeline that leverages information from multiple ligands without known bound structures to enhance pose selection. We first create distributions of feature similarities between ligand pose pairs, comparing near-native poses with all sampled docked poses. These distributions capture the likelihood of observing similar features, such as hydrogen bonds or hydrophobic contacts, in different pose configurations. These similarity distributions are then combined with a per-ligand docking score to enhance overall pose selection by 5% and 4.5% for high-affinity and congeneric series helper ligands, respectively. Open-ComBind reduces the average RMSD of ligands in our benchmark dataset by 9.0%. We provide Open-ComBind as an easy-to-use command line and Python API to increase pose prediction performance at www.github.com/drewnutt/open_combind.

Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.

The interaction between a protein and its ligands is one of the basic and most important processes in biological chemistry. Docking methods aim to predict the molecular 3D structure of protein-ligand complexes starting from coordinates of the protein and the ligand separately. They are widely used in both industry and academia, especially in the context of drug development projects. AutoDock4 is one of the most popular docking tools and, as for any docking method, its performance is highly system dependent. Knowledge about specific protein-ligand interactions on a particular target can be used to successfully overcome this limitation. Here, we describe how to apply the AutoDock Bias protocol, a simple and elegant strategy that allows users to incorporate target-specific information through a modified scoring function that biases the ligand structure towards those poses (or conformations) that establish selected interactions. We discuss two examples using different bias sources. In the first, we show how to steer dockings towards interactions derived from crystal structures of the receptor with different ligands; in the second example, we define and apply hydrophobic biases derived from Molecular Dynamics simulations in mixed solvents. Finally, we discuss general concepts of biased docking, its performance in pose prediction, and virtual screening campaigns as well as other potential applications.

A Consistent Scheme for Gradient-Based Optimization of Protein-Ligand Poses.

Scoring and numerical optimization of protein-ligand poses is an integral part of docking tools. Although many scoring functions exist, many of them are not continuously differentiable and they are rarely explicitly analyzed with respect to their numerical optimization behavior. Here, we present a consistent scheme for pose scoring and gradient-based pose optimization. It consists of a novel variant of the BFGS algorithm enabling step-length control, named LSL-BFGS (limited step length BFGS), and the empirical JAMDA scoring function designed for pose prediction and good numerical optimizability. The JAMDA scoring function shows a high pose prediction performance in the CASF-2016 docking power benchmark, top-ranking a pose with an RMSD of ≤2 Å in about 89% of the cases. The combination of JAMDA scoring with the LSL-BFGS algorithm shows a significantly higher optimization locality (i.e., no excessive movement of poses) than with the classical BFGS algorithm while retaining the characteristically low number of scoring function evaluations. The JAMDA scoring and optimization scheme is freely available for noncommercial use and academic research.

Coupling enhanced sampling of the apo-receptor with template-based ligand conformers selection: performance in pose prediction in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

We report the performance of our newly introduced Ensemble Docking with Enhanced sampling of pocket Shape (EDES) protocol coupled to a template-based algorithm to generate near-native ligand conformations in the 2019 iteration of the Grand Challenge (GC4) organized by the D3R consortium. Using either AutoDock4.2 or HADDOCK2.2 docking programs (each software in two variants of the protocol) our method generated native-like poses among the top 5 submitted for evaluation for most of the 20 targets with similar performances. The protein selected for GC4 was the human beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1), a transmembrane aspartic-acid protease. We identified at least one pose whose heavy-atoms RMSD was less than 2.5Å from the native conformation for 16 (80%) and 17 (85%) of the 20 targets using AutoDock and HADDOCK, respectively. Dissecting the possible sources of errors revealed that: (i) our EDES protocol (with minor modifications) was able to sample sub-ångstrom conformations for all 20 protein targets, reproducing the correct conformation of the binding site within ~ 1Å RMSD; (ii) as already shown by some of us in GC3, even in the presence of near-native protein structures, a proper selection of ligand conformers is crucial for the success of ensemble-docking calculations. Importantly, our approach performed best among the protocols exploiting only structural information of the apo protein to generate conformations of the receptor for ensemble-docking calculations.

Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

In order to improve the pose prediction performance of docking methods, we have previously developed the pose prediction using shape similarity (PoPSS) method. It identifies a ligand conformation of the highest shape similarity with target protein crystal ligands. The identified ligand conformation is then placed into the target protein binding pocket and refined using side-chain repacking and Monte Carlo energy minimization. Subsequently, we have reported a modification to PoPSS, named as PoPSS-Lite, using a simple grid-based energy minimization for side-chain repacking and Tversky correlation coefficient as the similarity metric. This modification has improved the pose prediction performance and PoPSS-Lite was one of the top performers in D3R GC3. Here we report a further modification to PoPSS that utilizes a continuum solvent model to account for water mediated protein ligand interactions. In this approach, named as PoPSS-PB, the ligand conformation of the highest shape similarity with crystal ligands is refined along with the target protein binding site by incorporating the Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics. The performance of PoPSS-PB along with PoPSS and PoPSS-Lite was prospectively evaluated in D3R GC4. PoPSS-PB not only demonstrated excellent performance with mean and median RMSDs of 1.20 and 1.13Å but also achieved improved performance over PoPSS and PoPSS-Lite. Furthermore, the comparison with other D3R GC4 pose prediction submissions revealed admirable performance. Our results showed that the binding poses of ligands with unknown binding modes can be successfully predicted by utilizing ligand 3D shape similarity with known crystallographic ligands and that taking the solvation into consideration improves pose prediction.

Protein\u2013ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3

We report the performance of HADDOCK in the 2018 iteration of the Grand Challenge organised by the D3R consortium. Building on the findings of our participation in last year’s challenge, we significantly improved our pose prediction protocol which resulted in a mean RMSD for the top scoring pose of 3.04 and 2.67 Å for the cross-docking and self-docking experiments respectively, which corresponds to an overall success rate of 63% and 71% when considering the top1 and top5 models respectively. This performance ranks HADDOCK as the 6th and 3rd best performing group (excluding multiple submissions from a same group) out of a total of 44 and 47 submissions respectively. Our ligand-based binding affinity predictor is the 3rd best predictor overall, behind only the two leading structure-based implementations, and the best ligand-based one with a Kendall’s Tau correlation of 0.36 for the Cathepsin challenge. It also performed well in the classification part of the Kinase challenges, with Matthews Correlation Coefficients of 0.49 (ranked 1st), 0.39 (ranked 4th) and 0.21 (ranked 4th) for the JAK2, vEGFR2 and p38a targets respectively. Through our participation in last year’s competition we came to the conclusion that template selection is of critical importance for the successful outcome of the docking. This year we have made improvements in two additional areas of importance: ligand conformer selection and initial positioning, which have been key to our excellent pose prediction performance this year.

A cross docking pipeline for improving pose prediction and virtual screening performance.

Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of a molecular docking method depend on the choice of protein structures used for docking. Multiple structures for a target protein are often used to take into account the receptor flexibility and problems associated with a single receptor structure. However, the use of multiple receptor structures is computationally expensive when docking a large library of small molecules. Here, we propose a new cross-docking pipeline suitable to dock a large library of molecules while taking advantage of multiple target protein structures. Our method involves the selection of a suitable receptor for each ligand in a screening library utilizing ligand 3D shape similarity with crystallographic ligands. We have prospectively evaluated our method in D3R Grand Challenge 2 and demonstrated that our cross-docking pipeline can achieve similar or better performance than using either single or multiple-receptor structures. Moreover, our method displayed not only decent pose prediction performance but also better virtual screening performance over several other methods.

POSIT: Flexible Shape-Guided Docking For Pose Prediction.

We present a new approach to structure-based drug design (POSIT) rigorously built on the simple concept that pose prediction is intimately coupled to the quality and availability of experimental structural data. We demonstrate the feasibility of the approach by performing retrospective analyses on three data sets designed to explore the strengths and weaknesses of POSIT relative to existing methods. We then present results documenting 2.5 years of prospective use of POSIT across a variety of structure-based industrial drug-discovery research projects. We find that POSIT is well-suited to guiding research decision making for structure-based design and, in particular, excels at enabling lead-optimization campaigns. We show that the POSIT framework can drive superior pose-prediction performance and generate results that naturally lend themselves to prospective decision making during lead optimization. We believe the results presented here are (1) the largest prospective validation of a pose prediction method reported to date (71 crystal structures); (2) provide an unprecedented look at the scope of impact of a computational tool; and (3) represent a first-of-its-kind analysis. We hope that this work inspires additional studies that look at the real impact and performance of computational research tools on prospective drug design.

Use of Experimental Design To Optimize Docking Performance: The Case of LiGenDock, the Docking Module of Ligen, a New De Novo Design Program

On route toward a novel de novo design program, called LiGen, we developed a docking program, LiGenDock, based on pharmacophore models of binding sites, including a non-enumerative docking algorithm. In this paper, we present the functionalities of LiGenDock and its accompanying module LiGenPocket, aimed at the binding site analysis and structure-based pharmacophore definition. We also report the optimization procedure we have carried out to improve the cognate docking and virtual screening performance of LiGenDock. In particular, we applied the design of experiments (DoE) methodology to screen the set of user-adjustable parameters to identify those having the largest influence on the accuracy of the results (which ensure the best performance in pose prediction and in virtual screening approaches) and then to choose their optimal values. The results are also compared with those obtained by two popular docking programs, namely, Glide and AutoDock for pose prediction, and Glide and DOCK6 for Virtual Screening.

Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Due to the large number of different docking programs and scoring functions available, researchers are faced with the problem of selecting the most suitable one when starting a structure-based drug discovery project. To guide the decision process, several studies comparing different docking and scoring approaches have been published. In the context of comparing scoring function performance, it is common practice to use a predefined, computer-generated set of ligand poses (decoys) and to reevaluate their score using the set of scoring functions to be compared. But are predefined decoy sets able to unambiguously evaluate and rank different scoring functions with respect to pose prediction performance? This question arose when the pose prediction performance of our piecewise linear potential derived scoring functions (Korb et al. in J Chem Inf Model 49:84-96, 2009) was assessed on a standard decoy set (Cheng et al. in J Chem Inf Model 49:1079-1093, 2009). While they showed excellent pose identification performance when they were used for rescoring of the predefined decoy conformations, a pronounced degradation in performance could be observed when they were directly applied in docking calculations using the same test set. This implies that on a discrete set of ligand poses only the rescoring performance can be evaluated. For comparing the pose prediction performance in a more rigorous manner, the search space of each scoring function has to be sampled extensively as done in the docking calculations performed here. We were able to identify relative strengths and weaknesses of three scoring functions (ChemPLP, GoldScore, and Astex Statistical Potential) by analyzing the performance for subsets of the complexes grouped by different properties of the active site. However, reasons for the overall poor performance of all three functions on this test set compared to other test sets of similar size could not be identified.

Improving molecular docking through eHiTS’ tunable scoring function

We present three complementary approaches for score-tuning that improve docking performance in pose prediction, virtual screening and binding affinity assessment. The methodology utilizes experimental data to customize the scoring function for the system of interest considering the specific docking scenario. The tuning approach, which has been implemented as an automated utility in eHiTS, is introduced as a solution to one of the conundrums of the molecular docking paradigm, namely, the lack of a universally well performing scoring function. The accuracy of scoring functions has been shown to be generally system-dependent, and particularly lacking for binding energy and bio-activity predictions. In the proposed approach, pose and energy predictions are enhanced by adjusting the relative weights of the eHiTS energy terms to improve score-RMSD or score-affinity correlations. In a virtual screening context ligand-based similarity is used to rescale the docking score such that better enrichment factors are achieved. We discuss the algorithmic details of the methods, and demonstrate the effects of score tuning on a variety of targets, including CDK2, BACE1 and neuraminidase, as well as on the popular benchmarks--the Directory of Useful Decoys and the PDBBind database.

The Ensemble Performance Index: An Improved Measure for Assessing Ensemble Pose Prediction Performance

We present a theoretical study on the performance of ensemble docking methodologies considering multiple protein structures. We perform a theoretical analysis of pose prediction experiments which is completely unbiased, as we make no assumptions about specific scoring functions, search paradigms, protein structures, or ligand data sets. We introduce a novel interpretable measure, the ensemble performance index (EPI), for the assessment of scoring performance in ensemble docking, which will be applied to simulated and real data sets.

PharmACOphore: Multiple Flexible Ligand Alignment Based on Ant Colony Optimization

The flexible superimposition of biologically active ligands is a crucial step in ligand-based drug design. Here we present pharmACOphore, a new approach for pairwise as well as multiple flexible alignment of ligands based on ant colony optimization (ACO; Dorigo, M.; Stützle, T. Ant Colony Optimization; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004). An empirical scoring function is used, which describes ligand similarity by minimizing the distance of pharmacophoric features. The scoring function was parametrized on pairwise alignments of ligand sets for four proteins from diverse protein families (cyclooxygenase-2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2, factor Xa and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ). The derived parameters were assessed with respect to pose prediction performance on the independent FlexS data set ( Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 4502 - 4520) in exhausting pairwise alignments. Additionally, multiple flexible alignment experiments were carried out for the pharmacologically relevant targets trypsin and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). The results obtained show that the new procedure provides a robust and efficient way for the pairwise as well as multiple flexible alignment of small molecules.

PharmACOphore: multiple flexible ligand alignment based on ant colony optimization

The flexible superimposition of biologically active ligands is a crucial step in ligand-based drug design. Here we present pharmACOphore, a new approach for pairwise as well as multiple flexible alignment of ligands based on ant colony optimization (ACO; Dorigo, M.; Stutzle, T. Ant Colony Optimization; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004). An empirical scoring function is used, which describes ligand similarity by minimizing the distance of pharmacophoric features. The scoring function was parametrized on pairwise alignments of ligand sets for four proteins from diverse protein families (cyclooxygenase-2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2, factor Xa and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ). The derived parameters were assessed with respect to pose prediction performance on the independent FlexS data set (Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 4502−4520) in exhausting pairwise alignments. Additionally, multiple flexible alignment experiments were carried out for the pharmacologically ...

Empirical Scoring Functions for Advanced Protein−Ligand Docking with PLANTS

In this paper we present two empirical scoring functions, PLANTS(CHEMPLP) and PLANTS(PLP), designed for our docking algorithm PLANTS (Protein-Ligand ANT System), which is based on ant colony optimization (ACO). They are related, regarding their functional form, to parts of already published scoring functions and force fields. The parametrization procedure described here was able to identify several parameter settings showing an excellent performance for the task of pose prediction on two test sets comprising 298 complexes in total. Up to 87% of the complexes of the Astex diverse set and 77% of the CCDC/Astex clean listnc (noncovalently bound complexes of the clean list) could be reproduced with root-mean-square deviations of less than 2 A with respect to the experimentally determined structures. A comparison with the state-of-the-art docking tool GOLD clearly shows that this is, especially for the druglike Astex diverse set, an improvement in pose prediction performance. Additionally, optimized parameter settings for the search algorithm were identified, which can be used to balance pose prediction reliability and search speed.