Perforator Pedicled Propeller Flap Research Articles

Delayed Reconstruction of the Perforator Pedicle Propeller Flap after the Induced Membrane Technique for Gustilo IIIB Open Distal Tibial Fracture.

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of delayed reconstruction of the perforator pedicle propeller flap after the induced membrane technique in the treatment of Gustilo IIIB open distal tibial fracture, and to evaluate the clinical outcome and complications of two different perforator pedicle propeller flaps.Thirty-four patients with Gustilo IIIB open distal tibial fractures treated by the induced membrane technique and delayed reconstruction of two different perforator pedicle propeller flaps from May 2017 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the different kinds of perforator pedicle propeller flaps covered. The operation required two stages. The Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST) was used to evaluate the healing of the tibial bone defect. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was used to evaluate ankle function. The complications associated with the technique were recorded.The number of serial debridements, excluding those performed during emergency and final operations, was a mean of 2.28±0.83 in the PAPF group. The PAPF group had a mean bone defect length of 6.76 ± 0.69 cm, the median healing time of 13.11 ± 0.96 months, RUST score 12.68 ± 1.63, and AOFAS score of 84.12 ± 6.38. On the other hand the PTAPF group's mean bone defect length was 6.73 ± 0.95 cm, the median healing time 12.63 ± 1.46 months, RUST score 13.73 ± 1.53 and AOFAS score 82.79 ± 5.49. There were no observed significant differences the two groups in the number of serial debridements, bone defect length, bone union time, RUST score, or AOFAS score (p>0.05). Flap size ranged from 9×6cm2 to 14×7cm2 in the PAPF group and from 9×6cm2 to 13×7cm2 in the PTAPF group. There were no severe complications such as flap-related complications or amputation. The differences in complications in the two groups were not statistically significant.In cases of severe open tibial fracture, the reconstructive method is important. When delayed reconstruction is inevitable, surgeons should first perform radical debridement, followed by vacuum sealing drainage as a bridging therapy; both PAPF and PTAPF can be considered for definitive soft tissue coverage.

Autologous Gluteal Augmentation with Parasacral Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps

De-epithelialized flaps have been used in gluteal contouring over the last three decades, but most improve the projection rather than the upper quadrants. The authors provide a detailed description of their method of gluteal augmentation using parasacral perforator-pedicled propeller flaps. This technique achieves a volumetric increase and maximal buttock projection at the midlevel and in the medial half of the buttocks. Between January and December of 2019, a series of 18 patients on whom a lower body lift with a parasacral perforator-pedicled propeller flap had been performed by the senior author (F.B.) were prospectively evaluated. Postoperatively, the satisfaction rate was assessed using a 10-point analog scale (1 = unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied) by the patient and by two independent surgeons based on photographs taken 1 year after surgery. Eighteen patients underwent this procedure. Their mean age was 32.2 ± 5.6 years (range, 24 to 40 years). The mean flap length was 20.3 cm, their mean width was 10.4 cm, and the mean thickness was 3.4 cm. The authors noted only two minor complications, one seroma and two skin dehiscences that healed without surgery. The rate of satisfaction as assessed by the patients was 8.3 out of 10 (±1.1), and by surgeons, 7.9 and 8.1. This article describes a gluteal autoaugmentation flap technique using parasacral perforator-pedicled propeller flaps to increase projection and volume in the inferomedial gluteal region after lower body lift. Therapeutic, IV.

Parallel Cross-Leg Free Flap with Posterior Tibial Artery Perforator Pedicle Propeller Cable Bridge Flap for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Wounds: A Case Series Report

Background A cross-leg flap can be used to treat severely injured lower limbs but associated with complications. Herein, we describe a technique of a parallel cross-leg free flap combined with posterior tibial artery perforator pedicle propeller cable bridge flap for the treatment of lower extremity wounds. Methods The artery and veins of the free flap are anastomosed to the contralateral posterior tibial artery and vein, respectively. The vascular pedicle is wrapped with a posterior tibial artery perforator pedicle propeller flap. The legs are allowed to remain in a straight, relaxed position which is maintained with a bandage or Kirschner wire placed at the distal limbs. Pedicle division is performed around 21 days after flap creation, and the posterior artery is re-anastomosed and pedicled flap returned to its original position. Results From June 2017 to March 2020, 7 patients with lower extremity wounds and tissue loss received reconstruction with this method. The recipient vessels for all flaps were the posterior tibial artery and vein. The average operation time was 5 hours. The average time to ambulation was 4 weeks, and the average follow-up time was 13.7 months. All flaps survived, and limb salvage was successful in all patients. Patients were not uncomfortable with the limbs held in position until pedicle division, and there were no complications. At the final follow-up, the function of all limbs was normal, and the esthetic appearance was acceptable to all patients. Conclusions The method described overcomes the disadvantages of traditional cross-leg flaps for the treatment.

The medial sural artery perforator pedicle propeller flap for lower middle-third anterior tibial soft tissue defect reconstruction: Case report and literature review

Abstract Lower extremity reconstruction still issues a challenge for plastic surgeons. The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has been reported for use to reconstruct the defects of the knee and proximal-third leg defects in many papers. But there is a few papers that described the technique of using this flap for reaching the middle third led defects. The authors report the first using MSAP propeller flap in Vietnam to cover the defect in a 45-year-old female patient who suffered from chronic ulcer with bone exposure over the middle third anterior tibial and evaluate the result of 4 months post-op. Keywords: Lower extremities defects reconstruction, perforator flap, medial sural artery perforator flap, propeller flap.

Application of free-style perforator pedicled propeller flap to repair the wound after extensive resection of skin malignant tumor on the thigh

To explore the effectiveness of free-style perforator pedicled propeller flap to repair the wound after extensive resection of skin malignant tumor on the thigh. Between December 2016 and June 2019, 12 patients with skin malignant tumor on the thigh were treated. There were 9 males and 3 females, aged from 8 to 65 years (median, 38.5 years). The etiologies included basal cell carcinoma in 3 cases, squamous cell carcinoma in 7 cases, fibrosarcoma in 1 case, and malignant melanoma in 1 case. The disease duration ranged from 5 months to 10 years (median, 7.5 years). Color Doppler ultrasound was used to detect and mark at least one perforator vessel before operation. After extensive resection, the size of wound ranged from 5.0 cm×3.5 cm to 8.5 cm×6.5 cm. In the range of 1-3 cm from the edge of the lesion, the perforator vessels were explored again from the deep surface of the deep fascia to confirm and mark. The perforator vessel with diameter greater than 0.5 mm and closest to the edge of the lesion was taken as the rotation point of the flap. According to the wound size and shape, the free-style perforator pedicled propeller flap in size of 8.0 cm×3.5 cm to 12.5 cm×6.0 cm was designed. The wound was repaired with the big blade of the flap. The donor site was closed directly with the aid of the small blade. The distal part of the skin flap was necrosis after operation, and healed after symptomatic treatment such as dressing change; the other flaps survived successfully and the wounds healed by first intention. All incisions at the donor site healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 5-24 months (mean, 10.2 months). During the follow-up, there was no recurrence of tumor. The flap had good elasticity and texture with no obvious swelling or scar hyperplasia, and the appearance was satisfactory; the hip and knee joint activities were normal. Based on the extensive skin blood supply and abundant perforator vessels of the thigh, the free-style perforator pedicled propeller flap is an ideal flap for repairing small or medium wound after extensive resection of skin malignant tumor on the thigh.

Propeller flap: Orthoplastic approach for coverage of distal leg and ankle defects

BackgroundCovering soft tissue defects of the distal one-third of the leg and the Achilles tendon region and is a challenging problem for an orthopedic surgeon. With recent advancements in the anatomical knowledge of perforating vessels, perforator-pedicled propeller flaps have become increasingly popular in recent decades. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of our patients whose soft tissue defects in the distal leg were reconstructed with propeller flaps and assessed association of complications with age, gender, flap size and arc of rotation. MethodsPatients that had a reconstruction with a propeller flap at the ankle from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The main indications for the propeller flap were small- and medium-sized soft tissue defects of the distal lower limb. 20 propeller flaps were applied to 19 patients (14 male, 5 female) for various lower extremity defects. ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 2 years (range, 6 months to 6 years). The average flap size was 82 cm2 (range, 48–125 cm2). The flap was rotated 180 degrees in nine patients The source of the perforator vessel was the tibialis posterior artery in 14 cases, the peroneal artery in 4 cases, both the tibialis posterior and peroneal arteries in 1 case. Four complications (20 %) occured postoperatively. Two patients developed partial necrosis at the tip of the flap, and two patients developed superficial epidermolysis. No correlations were found between complications and flap size and the arc of rotation. ConclusionsThe propeller flap is a reliable option for reconstruction of small to moderate defects in the lower extremity with good clinical results and minimal donor-site morbidity. It is applicable for orthopedic surgeons who do not have microsurgical experience or an available microscope in the operating room.

Our Definition of Propeller Flaps and Their Classification.

The term propeller flap was introduced for the first time by Hyakusoku to define an island flap, based on a subcutaneous pedicle hub, that was rotated 90 degrees to correct scar contractures due to burns. With the popularization of perforator flaps, the propeller movement was applied for the first time to a skin island vascularized only by an isolated perforator, and the terms propeller and perforator flap were used together. Thereafter, the surgical technique of propeller flaps evolved and new applications developed. With the "Tokyo consensus," we proposed a definition and a classification schema for propeller flaps. A propeller flap was defined as an "island flap that reaches the recipient site through an axial rotation." The classification included the SPP (SPP) flap, the perforator pedicled propeller (PPP) flap, and the supercharged PPP (SCP) flap. A recent update added a new category, the axial pedicled propeller (APP) flap. Here we propose our updated and comprehensive classification of propeller flaps, taking into account the previous classification and subsequent publications. Based on their vascular pedicle, we consider the following five types of propellers: (1) SPP flap, 2.PPP flap, its subtype (2a) SCP flap, (3) APP flap, (4) muscle propeller flap, and (5) chimeric propeller flap. The variables that can be taken into account in the classification are as follows: type of nourishing pedicle, degrees of skin island rotation, position of the nourishing pedicle, artery of origin of the pedicle, and flap shape.

Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

Reconstruction of the lower extremity is considered a major challenge due to frequent bone exposure and the absence of local tissue redundancy, as well as often due to the presence of vascular insufficiency. Many surgeons have preferred free flaps especially for reconstructing the more distal lower limb defects until the evolution of pedicled perforator flaps and propeller flaps in particular provided a like-with-like reconstruction of the lower extremity without affecting the main vessels of the limb or the underlying muscles, and without the risk of any microanastomosis especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps as local flaps in the lower extremity are best suited for small- and medium-sized defects with minimal donor-site morbidity, regardless of the cause of the defect. Any of the three source vessels of the leg can provide reliable perforators for propeller flap coverage of the distal leg and foot. The three main risk factors that are relative contraindications may be advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease.

Smartphone Thermal Imaging Can Enable the Safer Use of Propeller Flaps.

The use of thermography for the identification of cutaneous "hot spots" that coincide with perforators is not a new concept, but the required professional cameras may be prohibitively expensive. Only relatively recently, incredibly cheap but adequate thermal imaging cameras have become available that work in concert with the ubiquitous cell phone. This can now serve as a rapid, accurate, and complementary method for finding a perforator sufficient to serve as the hub for a perforator pedicled propeller flap. In addition, the preferred direction of rotation about that hub, effect of flap insetting on perfusion, and then postoperative monitoring are possible by proper interpretation of corresponding thermograms. Every reconstructive surgeon should be able to obtain this device, and then easily learn what potential attributes for them are available when planning a propeller flap.

The History of Propeller Flaps.

Several pedicled flaps were developed by Hyakusoku at the Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, in the 1980s to treat a large number of patients with postburn contractures. In this setting, the propeller flaps were described for the first time in 1991. The term propeller was used because of the blade shape of the skin island rotating on its axis. In 1989, Koshima introduced the term perforator flaps , whereas Hallock, in 2006, applied the perforator flap concept to the propeller flap. The name perforator pedicled propeller flap followed. Propeller flap had developed to be an important operative technique and a hot topic in the field of reconstructive microsurgery, with the important contribution of Teo. In 2009, the First Tokyo Meeting on Perforator and Propeller Flaps was held, where Pignatti reported the consensus on the definition and classification of propeller flaps that was given by the advisory panel of the meeting. Further evolutions developed since then will be described in this dedicated issue of Seminars of Plastic Surgery .

Propeller Flaps for the Anterior Trunk.

Various types of propeller flaps from multiple donor sites can be used to reconstruct anterior trunk skin defects. The actual selection depends on the condition and location of the recipient site, especially if it is to be the chest or abdomen that requires attention. Before surgery commences, it is always important to use an imaging analyses such as computed tomography angiography to examine and identify perforators that could perfuse a perforator-pedicled propeller flap (PPPF), as it is the most multifaceted imaging technique. Clusters of perforators that can be commonly used for the "workhorse" PPPFs for the thoracic and abdominal regions are the internal mammary artery perforator, the musculophrenic artery perforator, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator. These perforators are reliable and large enough to support long and large propeller flaps that will cover most defects in this region, while still allowing primary donor-site closure.

How to Design and Harvest a Propeller Flap.

Propeller flaps are local flaps based either on a subcutaneous pedicle, a single perforator, or vessels entering the flap in such a way so as to allow the flap to rotate on their axis. Depending on the kind of pedicle and the anatomical area, the preoperative investigation and the harvesting techniques may vary. An adequate knowledge of skin and subcutaneous tissue perfusion in the different areas of the body is very important to plan a propeller flap to be successful. The surgeon should begin by finding the most suitable perforators in the area surrounding the defect using available technology. The position, size, and shape of the flap are planned about this point. For perforator-pedicled propeller flaps, the procedure starts with an exploration from the margins of the defect or through a dedicated incision to visualize any perforators in the surroundings. The most suitable perforator is selected and isolated, the skin island is replanned, and the flap is harvested and rotated into the defect. The variations in surgical technique for other types of propellers and in specific anatomical areas are also described. Compared with free flaps, propeller flaps have the advantage of a simpler, shorter operation, without the need for a recipient vessel for microanastomosis. Yet, from a technical point of view, an adequate experience in dissecting perforators and the use of magnifying glasses are almost always required.

Modified Anterior Tibial Artery Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flap for Soft-Tissue Coverage of the Ankle and Heel.

The ankle and heel are challenging regions to reconstruct functionally. Here, we explored the feasibility and clinical outcomes of a modified anterior tibial artery perforator-pedicled propeller flap for the repair of soft-tissue defects of the ankle and heel. Between January 2013 and December 2015, 12 patients with soft-tissue defects of the ankle and/or heel underwent reconstructive surgery that included our flap technique. The flaps measured 20 × 8cm to 7 × 4cm. A hand-held Doppler was used to identify a proper constant perforator in the distal ankle. In each case, the base of the flap was well preserved. The flap was transposed (180° rotation) to reach and cover the defect. The average follow-up time was 13months (10-28months). We observed good texture matches and contour in all of the flaps. All patients could walk and wear normal footwear. All but one flap survived completely without complications. Partial loss was observed in one patient, and the necrotic region was healed with secondary intention. Our modified anterior tibial artery free-style perforator-pedicled propeller flap provides a novel option for functional ankle and heel reconstruction. Level IV.

Effect of Botulinum Toxin-A Injected to Muscle Tissue on Perfusion and Survival of Fasciocutaneous Single Perforator-pedicled Propeller Flap in Rats

Background:In plastic surgery practice, fasciocutaneous single-perforator-pedicled propeller flap is a preferred procedure; however, its survival rate is below than expected, especially in flaps with a big rotation arc. When botulinum toxin-A is injected into the muscle tissue that the perforator pedicle is arisen, the tonus of pertinent muscle can reduce and the blood flow of its perforator pedicle can increase. Therefore this procedure can improve the survival rate of single-perforator-pedicled propeller flap.Aims:To evaluate the effect of botulinum toxin-A injected with ultrasonographic guidance into the muscle tissue that the perforator pedicle is arisen from one month ago on the perfusion of flap scintigraphically and the survival rate of single-perforator-pedicled propeller flap in a rat model.Study Design:Animal experiment.Methods:Three study groups were receiving botulinum toxin-A (16 IU-0.4 mL), normal saline (0.4 mL), and no study drug one month ago before flap surgery. Injections were performed under ultrasonography guidance. Flaps were elevated fasciocutaneously over the right 2nd perforator pedicle, under the corneous, with a surgical loupe and microsurgery tool and were rotated clockwise 180°. Then the scintigraphic measurements were obtained after flap elevations in the study groups, including the whole-body and flap perfusions in the study rats. The involvement rate presents the ratio of flap perfusion to whole-body perfusion. Flaps were sutured back to the abdominal wall at the latest twisting angles. With standard photographs taken in all the groups on day 8 after the operation, whole and necrotic flap areas were calculated.Results:Scintigraphically the involvement rate (the ratio of flap perfusion to whole-body perfusion) of the flaps in the botulinum toxin-A group were found significantly higher than those in the other groups (p<0.05). The area of a flap in the botulinum toxin-A group on day 8 post flap suturing was found to be significantly higher than those in the other groups (p<0.05). The area of a necrosis and the percentage of necrosis on day 8 post flap suturing in the botulinum toxin-A group was found significantly lower than those of the sham and null groups (p<0.05).Conclusion:In a rat model, if with the ultrasonographic guidance, botulinum toxin-A is injected to the muscle which perforator of the prospective single-perforator-pedicled propeller flap originated and flap surgery is performed one month later after this injection, the perfusion of single-perforator-pedicled propeller flap increases scintigraphically and this improves flap survival and reduces its necrosis.

Delayed Stepwise Rotation for the Salvage of a Congested Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flap in Distal Lower Extremity with Severe Edema

Delayed Stepwise Rotation for the Salvage of a Congested Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flap in Distal Lower Extremity with Severe Edema

Effect of Botulinum toxin-A Injected to Muscle Tissue on Perfusion and Survival of Fasciocutaneous Single Perforator-pedicled Propeller Flap in Rats

Effect of Botulinum toxin-A Injected to Muscle Tissue on Perfusion and Survival of Fasciocutaneous Single Perforator-pedicled Propeller Flap in Rats

Perforator propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction: a literature review and case reports

Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps, which base their blood supply on isolated perforators, have been gaining popularity among plastic surgeons over the past two decades. They have proven to be of great value in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects in different areas of the body but are, thanks to their maximal mobility, mostly used in the reconstruction of extremities. In this article, we focus on perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction, where they can be implemented in the coverage of primary as well as secondary soft tissue defects. Firstly, a brief literature review on evolution of propeller flap use in lower extremity is provided. Moreover, we present our surgical technique including the use of indocyanine green real-time angiography for reliable flap transfer. In addition, we report 3 cases of patients in whom we used a local propeller flap for the closure of skin defects in different parts of the leg.

The medial sural artery perforator pedicled propeller flap for coverage of middle-third leg defects

Pedicled medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has been described primarily for the coverage of knee and proximal-third leg defects. The technique for reaching the middle third and its use as a retrograde-flow flap were never demonstrated with clarity. This retrospective case-series aimed to report the author's experience in these regards. Details of all patients who underwent pedicled MSAP flap for lower limb reconstruction over a 7-year period were collected. Surgical outcomes were examined retrospectively. For defects in the anterior middle third of the leg, the "pedicled propeller flap" design was utilized. To determine more distal defects beyond the reach of the anterograde-flow MSAP flap, retrograde-flow pedicled MSAP flaps were used. Eleven anterograde-flow pedicled MSAP flaps were used for defects ranging from the knee to the middle third of the leg. The etiologies of defects included trauma, chronic ulcer, and skin malignancy. All 11 anterograde pedicled MSAP flaps survived and achieved good outcomes. The mean pedicle length was 11.3 cm (range 7-18 cm), and the mean arc length after double pivoting (n = 4) was 29 cm (range 22-36 cm). Of three retrograde-flow pedicled MSAP flaps, two achieved the goal of wound coverage and one suffered complete flap loss. The "pedicled propeller flap" design extends the reach of the anterograde-flow pedicled MSAP flap as far as the middle-third anterior leg defects. Our preliminary experience with retrograde-flow MSAP flap has mixed results. Further studies are required to examine its reliability.

足関節部の軟部組織欠損に対する穿通枝プロペラ皮弁（PPP flap）を使用した軟部組織再建法

足関節部の軟部組織欠損に対する穿通枝プロペラ皮弁（PPP flap）を使用した軟部組織再建法

Perforator pedicled propeller flap: A reliable coverage of wounds around ankle

Background: This study aimed to determine the reliability of perforator pedicled propeller flap for coverage of wounds around the ankle. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study undertaken between September 2017 and November 2018 in the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of our institution. Patients with soft-tissue defect of the ankle referred from the Division of Orthopedic Surgery were included. Those with a scarring in the region of calf in the area of proposed flap were excluded. A detailed history and examination were recorded. A complete blood count, kidney and liver function tests, coagulation profile, and hepatitis B and C and human immunodeficiency viral marker testing were performed following informed consent. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the ankle were taken in all cases. Perforator pedicled propeller flaps were raised in all patients for coverage of soft-tissue defects around the ankle. All patients were followed up regularly. Results: Ten patients with soft-tissue defect around the ankle were referred to our division from the Division of Orthopedic Surgery or admitted through the outpatient department of the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of our institution. Eight patients were male and two were female, with the age ranging from 10 to 50 years. The mean operation time was 58 min. Size of the flap varied from 21 cm × 8 cm (168 cm2) to 8 cm × 5 cm (40 cm2). Flaps were rotated through 110°–180°. Out of ten flaps, eight flaps survived completely without any complications. Partial flap loss was found in one patient (10%), marginal flap necrosis in one patient (10%), and none of the flap was lost completely. Thus, the overall success rate of perforator pedicled propeller flap in our study observed was 80%. Conclusion: The perforator-based propeller flap is a versatile and reliable flap for the coverage of soft-tissue defects around the ankle because its vascularity is predictable.