Percutaneous Pin Fixation Research Articles

Outcomes of Non-Operative and Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: Current Concepts

Proximal Humerus Fractures (PHF) account for 5-6% of all adult fractures and have a bimodal distribution involving young patients with high-energy trauma or, more commonly, older patients with low-energy falls. Whenever possible, particularly with non- or minimally displaced fractures, PHFs can be treated non-operatively. Many recent studies have demonstrated no outcome difference between non-operative treatment and any common operative option. Operative treatment options for PHFs include percutaneous pinning, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nails (IMN), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Generally displaced three or four-part fractures are indicated for operative fixation. However, the ProFHER (Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomization) trial demonstrated satisfactory results may be achieved when PHFs are managed non-operatively. This review will focus on the latest evidence and outcomes following non-operative and operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF).

Management of Unstable Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures With a 2-Pin External Fixator and a Short Arm Cast: Technique and Case Series

Introduction: Pediatric distal radius fractures that are unacceptably aligned and undergo closed reduction are often redisplaced when immobilized in a cast alone without additional fixation. Percutaneous pinning, plate and screw fixation, and 4-pin wrist joint and physis-spanning external fixation constructs have previously been described to achieve and maintain reduction. Technique and Results: We successfully treated and followed 12 consecutive pediatric patients presenting with malaligned, nonphyseal distal radius fractures that were reduced and held with a 2-pin external fixation construct that did not extend distal to the physis, supplemented by a short arm cast. No complications were encountered in this series of patients. Conclusion: Two-pin external fixation is an alternative solution for completely displaced or markedly angulated pediatric distal radius fractures.

Analysis of risk factors for failed closed reduction in pediatric Gartland Type III supracondylar humerus fracture

PurposeGartland Type III supracondylar humerus fractures are commonly treated using closed reduction followed by percutaneous pin fixation. However, conversion to open reduction may be necessary if closed reduction fails. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with failed closed reduction and provide a theoretical basis for clinical decision-making in the treatment of Gartland Type III fractures. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on children with Gartland Type III supracondylar humerus fracture who underwent surgical treatment between April 2017 and June 2018. Based on whether or not the closed reduction was successful, patients were split into the open reduction group and the closed reduction group. Within the closed reduction group, subgroup analysis based on surgery duration was carried out. Data were collected from medical records and X-ray images. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were utilized to evaluate the relationship between variables and failed closed reduction. ResultsThe study included 36 patients in the open reduction group and 135 patients in the closed reduction group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of angle (P=0.024, OR=3.199), rotation (P=0.000, OR=6.359), skin creases (P=0.013, OR=4.077), anterior-posterior displacement ratio (P=0.011, OR=4.337), fracture angle in the anteroposterior view (P=0.014, OR=0.939), and fracture distal displacement direction (P=0.002, OR=5.384) were independent risk factors for failed closed reduction. Subgroup analysis showed that fracture distal displacement direction (P=0.013), skin folds (P=0.013), lateral displacement ratio (P=0.016), and anterior-posterior displacement value (P=0.005) significantly influenced the duration of closed reduction surgery. ConclusionThe presence of sharp angle or rotation at the fracture ends, skin folds on the anterior elbow, minor anterior-posterior displacement of the fracture, higher medial inclination of the fracture plane, and distal fracture displacement towards the radial side are independent risk factors for failed closed reduction in pediatric Gartland Type III supracondylar humerus fracture.

Incidence of complications among operative pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using medial and lateral pins: a safe technique for percutaneous medial pin placement.

Cross-pinning of displaced pediatric supracondylar elbow fractures offers a superior stability construct. However, there is a reluctance to use this construct by closed means because of the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries associated with percutaneous medial pin placement. This study describes a safe technique for closed reduction percutaneous with medial pin placement. This study reviewed the clinical charts of 232 pediatric patients who underwent closed reduction with cross-pinning of Gartland type II and III supracondylar fractures from 2000 to 2022 at a single institution. All surgeries were performed by the same attending surgeon at the same institution, with the same technique of medial pin placement. The inpatient and outpatient notes were used to record patient demographic information, fracture classification, and postoperative complications. A total of 232 pediatric patients [114 boys, 118 girls; mean age: 5.8 (range: 1-14) years] with Gartland type II (n = 97) and III (n = 135) supracondylar fractures were included in the study. There were a total of seven (3.02%) postoperative complications: four (1.7%) ulnar neuropathies, two (0.86%) pin site infections, and one (0.43%) anterior interosseous nerve palsy. All documented postoperative complications were resolved by the 3-month follow-up visit. There were no complications of deep infection, malunion, or nonunion. With the proper technique, closed reduction with percutaneous medial pin fixation of pediatric supracondylar fractures is safe and produces excellent postoperative outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Comparison Between Intramedullary Nail and Percutaneous Pin Fixation in Proximal Phalanx Fractures.

Percutaneous pinning has been the predominant technique for fixation of proximal phalanx fractures, but stiffness is a reported complication. The introduction of intramedullary (IM) nail fixation of proximal phalanx fractures provides a stronger biomechanical fixation for amenable fracture patterns with the added benefit of not tethering the soft tissue. The goal of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of IM nail and percutaneous pin fixation in isolated proximal phalanx fractures. A retrospective review was performed at our institution between the years 2018 and 2022 for patients treated for proximal phalanx fractures. Patients that underwent fixation with IM nails or percutaneous fixation for isolated extraarticular proximal phalanx fractures were included. Patients were excluded if they had concomitant hand fractures, tendon injury, or intraarticular extension. A total of 50 patients were included in this study. Twenty-eight patients received percutaneous pin fixation, and 22 patients underwent IM nail or screw fixation. There was no significant difference in injury patterns or demographics between these two groups. Patients that underwent IM nail fixation had a significantly quicker return to active motion, shorter duration of orthosis treatment, and fewer occupational therapy visits. In addition, patients in the IM fixation group had significantly improved range of motion (ROM) at 6 weeks postoperatively. This study demonstrates that patients receiving percutaneous pin or IM nail fixation have equivocal union and complication rates. The IM nail fixation group was able to have quicker return to mobilization, fewer required occupational therapy visits, and improved early ROM.

MEDIUM-TERM OUTCOMES FOR SURGICAL VERSUS NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT FOR BENNETT'S FRACTURES OF THE THUMB METACARPAL: A MATCHED COHORT STUDY

There is no agreement as to the superiority or specific indications for cast treatment, percutaneous pinning or open fracture fixation for Bennett's fractures of the thumb metacarpal. We undertook this study to compare the outcomes of treatment for patients treated for Bennett's fracture in the medium term.We reviewed 33 patients treated in our unit for a bennett's fracture to the thumb metacarpal with closed reduction and casting. Each patient was matched with a patient treated surgically. Patients were matched for sex, age, Gedda grade of injury and hand dominance. Patients were reviewed at a minimum of 5-years and 66-patients were reviewed in total. Patients were examined clinically and also asked to complete a DASH questionnaire score and the brief Michigan hand questionnaire. Follow up plain radiographs were taken of the thumb and these were reviewed and graded for degenerative change using the Eaton-Littler score.Sixty-six patients were included in the study, with 33 in the surgical and non-surgical cohorts respectively. The average age was 39 years old. In each cohort, 12/33 were female, 19/33 were right-handed with 25% of individuals injuring their dominant hand. In each coort there were 16 Grade 1 fractures, 4 Grade 2 and 13 Grade 3 fractures. There was no difference between the surgically treated and cast-treatment cohorts of patients when radiographic arthritis, pinch grip, the brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire and pain were assessed at final review. The surgical cohort had significantly lower DASH scores at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in the normalised bMHQ scores.Our study was unable to demonstrate superiority of either operative or non-operative fracture stabilization. Patients in the surgical cohort reported superior satisfaction and DASH scores but did not demonstrate any superiority in any other objectively measured domain.

Management of Pediatric Humeral Supracondylar Fractures in a Referral Center From a Developing Country: A Comparison With American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Guidelines.

Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the predominant type of pediatric elbow fractures. The usual mechanism of injury is falling over the hand with the elbow extended and the hand open. The management of these fractures encompasses a range of treatment options, and their goal is to recover the anatomy and achieve a stable contact area between them. There are some controversies on the management of these injuries mainly focused on those that present some degree of displacement. A review and analysis of the current treatment at our institution and a comparison with the guidelines suggested by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) for the treatment of these fractures in the pediatric population were performed. Materials and methods This was an observational, analytical, retrospective study of consecutive pediatric patients with displaced supracondylar humeral fracture treated at Hospital de Trauma "Manuel Giagni" in Asunción, Paraguay, from January 2016 to December 2021. Demographic and clinical data were assessed, and patients were clinically and radiologically followed for at least 12 months. The management of supracondylar humeral fractures at our hospital was compared with the guidelines suggested by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) by analyzing whether these guidelines were applied in each case. The mechanism of injury was divided into three groups, initial X-rays were measured, extension-type fractures were categorized into three groups, and the type of treatment was divided into two groups: non-operative and operative. Furthermore, trauma-related preoperative complications and postoperative complications were reported. Outpatient follow-up was performed for at least 12 months in all cases. Results Of the 843 patients analyzed, 71.5% were male, with a mean age of 5.6 years. It was observed that 57.5% of injuries were caused by falls on the same level. The most frequent type of injury was Gartland type III, accounting for 55% of the cases, and associated injuries were found in 4% of the cases. With regard to the type of treatment, 91.8% of patients were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. Complications on admission were found in 12% of the casesand late complications in 12% of the cases. Most patients (82%) had excellent Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Conclusion Supracondylar fractures were more frequent in males and in schoolchildren. Garland type III fractures were the most common type of injury. The treatment of choice was predominantly closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was excellent in most patients. Our service, a referral center of a public hospital in a developing country, complies with the guidelines recommended by the AAOS.

Surgical strategies in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: our experience.

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common skeletal injury of childhood elbow. Treatment option for Gartland type II-III-IV fractures is based on closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) fixation using Kirshner wires. Seldom open reduction is needed. Literature described different method of CRPP. The aim of the study is to report our experience in the surgical management of supracondylar humeral fractures comparing it with the literature, in order to identify useful information for a correct and better approach to reduce complications and improve clinical outcomes. 148 patients with a mean age of 5.72 ± 2.52 years and with Gartland type II-III-IV humeral supracondylar fractures were treated with CRPP at our Orthopedic Pediatric Unit. They were divided into three groups according to surgical technique. Group A was represented by patients treated with cross pinning (1 medial and 1 lateral pin), Group B represented by 2 lateral pins while Group C represented by 2 lateral and one medial pin. Evaluation criteria are based on Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI); Bauman's and Carrying Angle and Flynn's criteria. Data were recorded at the following times: T0 (before surgical procedure); T1 (one-month post-surgery); T2 (six months post-surgery). The three surgical techniques showed comparable results according to MEPI, Bauman's angle, Carrying's angle and Flynn's criteria from T0 to T1. There is an improvement for all Groups. Group C reported the best MEPI outcome at T2. However, 2 patients in this group did not show excellent results according to Flynn's criteria. There is no single and superior treatment for displaced humeral supracondylar fractures and that each fracture has its own personality.

Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges.

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are a common type of fracture, particularly in older adults, accounting for approximately 5-6% of all fractures. This article provides a comprehensive review of PHFs, focusing on epidemiology, injury mechanism, clinical and radiographic assessment, classification systems, and treatment options. The incidence of PHFs varies across regions, with rates ranging from 45.7 to 60.1 per 100,000 person-years. Females are more susceptible to PHFs than males, and the incidence is highest in women over the age of 85. The injury mechanism of PHFs is typically bimodal, with high-energy injuries predominant in younger individuals and low-energy injuries in the elderly. Clinical assessment of PHFs involves obtaining a thorough history, physical examination, and evaluation of associated injuries, particularly neurovascular injuries. Radiographic imaging helps assess fracture displacement and plan for treatment. The Neer classification system is the most commonly used classification for PHFs, although other systems, such as AO/OTA, Codman-Hertel, and Resch classifications, also exist. The choice of treatment depends on factors such as patient age, activity level, fracture pattern, and surgeon expertise. Nonoperative management is typically preferred for elderly patients with minimal displacement, while operative fixation is considered for more complex fractures. Nonoperative treatment involves sling immobilization followed by physiotherapy, with good outcomes reported for certain fracture patterns. Operative management options include closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or arthroplasty. CRPP is suitable for specific fracture patterns, but the quality of reduction is crucial for favorable outcomes. ORIF is used when CRPP is not feasible, and various surgical approaches are available, each with its advantages and potential complications. PHFs are a significant clinical challenge due to their prevalence and complexity. Treatment decisions should be patient centered based on patient factors and fracture severity.

Outcome of treatment of intra-articular distal end radius fractures by volar locking plate versus bridging external fixator augmented by single K-wire through radial styloid

Background: Distal radius fractures are common injuries occurring more frequently than any other fracture, and remain one of the most frequent skeletal injuries treated by orthopaedic or trauma surgeons. They are considered the most common fracture of the upper extremity. The use of percutaneous pin fixation, external fixation devices that permit distraction and palmar translation, low-profile internal fixation plates and implants, arthroscopically assisted reduction, and grafting techniques including bone-graft substitutes all have contributed to improving fracture stability and outcome. Methods: This is a prospective study consisting of 30 patients, who were treated with volar locking plate or K-wire augmented external fixation for intra-articular commented distal radius fractures (AO type C) at Rajendra institute of medical sciences between November 2020 and January 2023. The 15 patients were treated with open reduction using the volar approach and locking plate were used while 15 patients were treated with closed reduction under fluoroscopy, distraction with the external fixator (Joshi type external fixator) along with K-wire fixation for additional stability used. Result: The ORIF with plating group showed better functional outcomes in Green and O'Brien compared to ex fix group. The radiographic results in the ORIF group were more favorable than in the EF group. Conclusions: We found that both ORIF with plating and external fixation represent treatment choices for distal radius fractures. ORIF had better functional and radiological outcomes according to Green and O'Brien and Sarmiento scoring systems when compared to external fixation. ORIF had less incidence of complications compared with external fixation.

Transphyseal distal humeral separation in neonates: A case series

IntroductionBirth trauma is a rare condition. Typically, injury in neonates occurs as a result of obstetrical manipulation to allow delivery or from trauma sustained during a difficult passage through the birth canal. Transphyseal separation of the humerus is particularly rare. Diagnosis is not always straightforward and is prone to mistakes. There is a general consensus that the outcome is usually favorable. It is generally agreed that the fracture needs to be realigned, while the suggested methods in contention vary from a simple plaster cast to closed and even open reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. The purpose of this study was to review our experience in treating transphyseal distal humeral separation in neonates to better define the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. MethodsTen consecutive cases of transphyseal distal humeral separation in neonates were treated at our institution between September 2008 and June 2021. All cases were reviewed and clinical data collected on birth injury risk factors, diagnostic workup, age at diagnosis and treatment, and type of treatment. Results of treatment and outcome were analyzed for time to fracture union, complications and clinical alignment, range of motion and residual pain at the latest follow-up. ResultsMean age at diagnosis was 4.2 days (range 0 to 9 days) and time between diagnosis and treatment varied from three to 26 h (average 15 h). Risk factors for birth injury were present in six patients. Four patients were initially treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization, all the other cases were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Arthrography was performed at the time of treatment in six cases. Average follow-up was 37 months (range 12 to 120 months). At the latest follow-up, all fractures had healed with full range of motion. No clinical or radiographic deformity requiring repeated surgery or physeal damage was observed. ConclusionsThis rare lesion may occur both in the presence and in the absence of risk factors. Due to the rarity of the injury, misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are not uncommon. Treatment with closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation is advisable and safe.

Comparison of Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes in Older Adults Stratified by Chronologic vs Physiologic Age Managed With Casting vs Surgery

Casting is recommended for adults older than 65 years with distal radius fractures (DRFs) because similar long-term outcomes are achieved regardless of treatment. However, physiologically younger adults could benefit from operative DRF management despite advanced chronologic age. To examine how chronologic age compares with measures of physiologic age in DRF treatment recovery. This retrospective secondary analysis of the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial (WRIST) was performed from May 1 to August 31, 2022. WRIST was a 24-center randomized clinical trial that enrolled participants older than 60 years with unstable DRFs from April 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Participants selected casting or surgery. Patients who selected surgery were randomly assigned to volar lock plating, percutaneous pinning, or external fixation. Participants were stratified by chronologic age, number of comorbidities, and activity status. The primary outcome was Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) score assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Partial correlation (PC) analysis adjusted for confounding. The final cohort consisted of 293 participants (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [8.89] years; 255 [87%] female; 247 [85%] White), with 109 receiving casting and 184 receiving surgery. Increased chronologic age was associated with increased MHQ scores in the surgery group at all time points but decreased MHQ scores in the casting group at 12 months (mean [SD] score, -0.46 [0.21]; P = .03). High activity was associated with improved MHQ scores in the surgical cohort at 6 weeks (mean [SD] score, 12.21 [5.18]; PC = 0.27; P = .02) and 12 months (mean [SD] score, 13.25 [5.77]; PC = 0.17; P = .02). Comorbidities were associated with decreased MHQ scores at all time points in the casting group. Clinically significant differences in MHQ scores were associated with low physical activity, 4 or more comorbidities, or increased age by 15 years. In this retrospective secondary analysis of WRIST, chronologic age was not associated with functional demand. These findings suggest that physicians should counsel active older adults with few comorbidities on earlier return to daily activities after surgery compared with casting. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01589692.

Early Surgical Results of Pediatric Unicondylar Phalangeal Fractures

Conventional teaching dictates that timely diagnosis and expeditious treatment of unicondylar phalangeal fractures are essential to restore articular congruity, which allows for optimal range of motion and function. The objective of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical results of surgical treatment of acute and chronic unicondylar phalanx fractures in pediatric patients. Thirty-four patients with unicondylar phalangeal fractures underwent surgical intervention at a pediatric tertiary care center from 2004 to 2016. A fracture was defined as acute if an interval of 4 weeks or less had elapsed between the date of injury and date of surgery and chronic if an interval of more than 4 weeks had elapsed between the date of injury and date of surgery. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were assessed. The joint alignment was determined by measuring the angle between the longitudinal axis of the phalanx and a line tangential to the articular condyles on anteroposterior radiographs. There were 24 patients (71%) with acute and 10 (29%) with chronic fractures. An oblique volar fracture pattern was most common in both the groups. The average joint alignment obtained from the anteroposterior radiographs at presentation was 6° in the acute group and 12° in the chronic group. The surgical procedures performed included closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, open reduction and internal fixation, osteoclasis or osteotomy and fixation, and corrective advancement osteotomy. The posttreatment alignment was within 3° of neutral in 21 patients (88%) with acute injury and 8 (80%) with chronic injury. The average interphalangeal joint range of motion at the final clinic visit was 1°-92° in the acute group and 4°-85° in the chronic group. One patient with chronic injury developed avascular necrosis after treatment with corrective osteotomy. The patterns and characteristics of unicondylar phalanx fractures are similar between pediatric patients and adults. The radiographic alignment and digital motion are improved with surgical reduction and fixation, regardless of chronicity. Therapeutic IV.

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Various Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures

To conduct a cost-effectiveness study of nonsurgical and surgical treatment options for distal radius fractures using distinct posttreatment outcome patterns. We created a decision tree to model the following treatment modalities for distal radius fractures: nonsurgical management, external fixation, percutaneous pinning, and plate fixation. Each node of the model was associated with specific costs in dollars, a utility adjustment (quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), and a percent likelihood. The nodes of the decision tree included uneventful healing, eventful healing and no further intervention, carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger, and tendon rupture as well as associated treatments for each event. The percent probabilities of each transition state, QALY values, and costs of intervention were gleaned from a systematic review. Rollback and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analyses were conducted to identify optimal treatment strategies. Threshold values of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY were used to distinguish the modalities in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis. Both the rollback analysis and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis revealed nonsurgical management as the predominant strategy when compared with the other operative modalities. Nonsurgical management dominated external fixation and plate fixation, although it was comparable with percutaneous fixation, yielding a $2,242 lesser cost and 0.017 lesser effectiveness. The cost effectiveness of nonsurgical management is driven by its decreased cost to the health care system. Plate and external fixation have been shown to be both more expensive and less effective than other proposed treatments. Percutaneous pinning has demonstrated more favorable effectiveness in the literature than plate and external fixation and, thus, may be more cost effective in certain circumstances. Future studies may find value in investigating further clinical aspects of distal radius fractures and their association with nonsurgical management versus that with plate fixation. Economic/decision analysis II.

Multifocal percutaneous pin fixation of talar neck fractures: An alternative to ORIF in the polytraumatized patient

PurposeUnique anatomy, precise articulations, fragile vascularity, and the demand for anatomic reduction make talar neck fractures challenging to treat, whether with screws and/or plates. Multifocal percutaneous pin fixation (MPPF) offers an alternative to ORIF, particularly in the polytraumatized patient. MethodsUnless an open lateral wound or medial malleolus fracture was present, a standard anteromedial approach was performed. K-wires placed within the talar head were used as joysticks to facilitate and finalize reduction. At least 3 wires were placed medially and 2 laterally across the talar neck. Incisions were closed in 2 layers, and either a well-padded short leg splint or adjunctive ankle-spanning external fixation was utilized. Patients remained non-weightbearing until K-wire removal in the office at approximately 6–8 weeks postoperatively. ResultsMPPF was performed in 7 patients, the majority of whom were female (6 of 7). The average patient age at the time of injury was 30.3 years (range 17–51 years). The median time of final follow up was 27 months. Comminution was present in all patients. Avascular necrosis (AVN) developed in 3 patients and non-union occurred in 2 patients. All patients developed subtalar posttraumatic arthritis, and 6 additionally developed tibiotalar arthritis. No patients underwent talectomy or osteotomy, and there were no superficial pin site infections or loosening of pins prior to scheduled removal. ConclusionsObtaining and maintaining an adequate reduction is possible with minimal soft tissue compromise through MPPF. Despite the complexity of the series, outcomes utilizing MPPF are comparable to those reported in the literature.

Circular External Fixation for Distal Femoral Physeal Injury: A Case Report

Background: Distal femoral physeal injuries are a challenging clinical scenario because the injuries have a high risk of growth disturbance. The selected treatments include closed reduction and cast immobilization, percutaneous pin fixation, and cannulated screws or internal fixation, but these treatments have some complications. Circular external fixation enables rigid immobilization and walking with full weight bearing. To the best of our knowledge, there is no article on the results of using circular external fixation for distal femoral physeal injury. This case is the first in which circular external fixation for distal femoral physeal injury is used. Case Presentation: A 9-year-old boy was injured in a skiing accident, and his injury was a Salter-Harris type II fracture of the distal femoral epiphysis. We immediately performed percutaneous pin fixation with circular external fixation under general anesthesia. After surgery, he was allowed to walk with full weight bearing. One year after surgery, he had no pain, and his knee regained full extension and 140°flexion. Conclusion: We consider circular external fixation to be an effective treatment option because of its rigid immobilization without injury to the plate. However, we and patients must fully acknowledge its difficulties (i.e., pin-site problems, neurologic injury, vascular injury, joint stiffness, and pain, and difficulty sleeping).

A Six-Year Clinical Profile of Distal Radius Fractures in a South Asian Population.

Background: The description, types and management of distal radius fractures have not been evaluated for a South Asian population. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical profile of distal radius fractures in adults over a 6-year period. Methods: The medical records of distal radius fracture patients, aged 18 years and above admitted between August 2014 and 2020 were assessed. Epidemiological profile, fracture classification, treatment and reasons for implant removal were assessed. Results: A total of 1066 distal radius fractures in 1005 inpatients were identified. The mean age was 42.1 ± 15.3 years (50.2 years [male] & 39.7 years [female]). A total of 65.5% patients sustained high-energy injury. 38.6% (n = 411) of fractures were classified as extra-articular AO-23-A, 24.3% (n = 259) as partially intra-articular AO-23-B and 39% (n = 416) as intra-articular AO-23-C. The treatment was non-surgical for 20.9% and surgical for 79.1% of cases. Plate fixation was the most frequently used surgical method followed by percutaneous pinning and external fixation. The proportion of patients treated by each modality remained constant based on a year-wise analysis of data. A total of 56 patients underwent implant removal, most commonly at the request of the patient. Conclusions: Our study is the longest study in a South Asian setting where the population is younger, with a male pre-ponderance, sustaining high-energy injury as compared to the literature. This can be attributed to our study population being inpatients only. As population-based fracture registry is not available in our country, hospital-based studies such as ours provide the best option to study fracture patterns, distribution and trends in treatment. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Comparing Calcaneus Fracture Radiographic Outcomes and Complications after Percutaneous Pin versus Screw Fixation

Calcaneus fracture fixation is associated with high rates of morbidity and disability from wound complications, infection, subtalar arthritis, and malunion. Percutaneous fixation with Kirshner wires (K-wires) or screws may be implemented when soft tissue injury precludes an open approach. Although screws are thought to provide greater stability, limited data exists directly comparing fixation success of these implants. Medical record data from 53 patients (62 total fractures) surgically treated with percutaneous screws (28 fractures) or K-wires (34 fractures) for joint-depression calcaneus fractures at a large tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Bohler's angle and calcaneal varus were assessed from available radiographs at time of injury, postoperatively, and at final follow-up, and joint congruity was assessed postoperatively and at final follow-up. Complications were also extracted. There were no statistical differences in patient characteristics between surgical groups although a higher proportion of patients treated with K-wires compared to screws had other associated injuries (79% vs 42%, p = .01). A higher proportion of fractures treated with screws compared to K-wires maintained joint congruity at the final follow-up (69% vs 32%, p = .005). However, there were no statistically detectable differences in other postoperative radiographic metrics (p > .05). In conclusion, joint congruity was more often maintained with screw fixation although there was no statistical difference in restoration and maintenance of Bohler's angle or varus alignment. The difference in radiographic metrics was not correlated with secondary procedures, namely subtalar arthrodesis, and may not be clinically significant. Neither group was completely effective in attaining and maintaining reduction, and additional fixation strategies should be considered if feasible based on patient, injury, and soft tissue characteristics.

Surgical (percutaneous pinning or plate fixation) versus non-surgical interventions for distal radius fractures in adults: an individual participant data review

Surgical (percutaneous pinning or plate fixation) versus non-surgical interventions for distal radius fractures in adults: an individual participant data review

A Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Techniques in Metacarpal Shaft Fractures.

Background Typically, metacarpal shaft fractures are treated with closed reduction percutaneous pinning, intramedullary nails, or plate fixation. Recently some surgeons have begun using intramedullary headless compression screws. Questions/Purposes The purpose of this study was to compare intramedullary screw fixation to K-wire fixation, which is the standard of care in a transverse metacarpal midshaft fracture, using a cadaveric model. Our hypothesis was that intramedullary screw fixation would have a biomechanical advantage (higher stiffness and peak load to failure) when compared with dual Kirschner wire fixation of transverse metacarpal shaft fractures. Methods Four-point bend testing was performed to compare stiffness and failure load values of seven paired 2nd and 3rd metacarpals instrumented with headless intramedullary compression screw fixation or Kirschner wire fixation. Similar testing was performed on 14 unpaired 4th metacarpals. Results There was no significant difference in peak load ( p = 0.60) or stiffness ( p = 0.85) between fixation groups for the 2nd and 3rd instrumented metacarpals. For the instrumented 4th metacarpals, there was no significant difference in peak load ( p = 0.14), but the stiffness was significantly greater ( p = 0.01) for the compression screw group compared with the Kirschner wire fixation. Conclusions/Clinical Relevance In this study, the load to failure was not different between the two fixation methods and likely both techniques can sustain physiologic loads needed for rehabilitation. The greater stiffness in the 4th metacarpal compression screw group may be related to the smaller canal morphology than in the 2nd and 3rd metacarpals. Larger diameter screws may be needed to obtain a better fit particularly in the 2nd and 3rd metacarpals.