Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Feeding Research Articles

Pre-Stroke Frailty and Outcomes following Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Insertion.

Frailty is common in stroke, where it exerts disease- and treatment-modifying effects. However, there has been little work evaluating how frailty influences outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion. This study investigates the relationship between pre-stroke frailty and one-year mortality following PEG insertion. A pre-stroke frailty index (FI) was calculated for individuals with post-stroke dysphagia who underwent PEG insertion between March 2019 and February 2021. Mortality was recorded at one year, as well as instances of post-PEG pneumonia and discharge destination. Twenty-nine individuals underwent PEG insertion, eleven (37.9%) of whom died in the subsequent year. The mean (SD) FI for those who survived was 0.10 (0.09), compared to 0.27 (0.19) for those who died (p = 0.02). This remained significant after adjustment for age and sex, with each 0.1 increase in the FI independently associated with an increased odds of one-year mortality (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17-1.67). There was no association between frailty and post-PEG pneumonia (0.12 (0.21) in those who aspirated versus 0.11 (0.18) in those who did not, p = 0.75). Pre-stroke frailty is associated with increased one-year mortality after PEG, a finding that may help inform shared clinical decision-making in complex decisions regarding PEG feeding.

Tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradio-/radio therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the GRADE approach

ScopeThe scope of this systematic review (SR) was to determine whether a nasogastric tube (NGT) or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a more useful supportive therapy in patients with oral cancer undergoing chemoradio-/radio therapy. MethodsFor the review, two authors searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Ichushi-Web to identify clinical practice guidelines, SRs and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) according to pre-determined criteria. RevMan Web was used to combine trials and analyse the data. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system approach. ResultsIt was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of only treatment completion based on the included RCTs; therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of treatment breaks as a surrogate outcome. A meta-analysis of potential treatment breaks, including treatment discontinuation, revealed no superiority between PEG and NGT (risk ratio=0.64 [0.23, 1.79]). A meta-analysis was conducted on two RCTs regarding the harms of infection. There does not appear to be a significant increase in the risk of infection with either PEG or NGT (risk ratio=1.18 [0.45, 3.08]). The certainty of the evidence for two outcomes was judged to be very low. Further, meta-analyses of quality of life and nutritional status were not possible because of differences in assessment methods. ConclusionWe could not determine the superiority of NGT or PEG in the supportive care of oral cancer patients who received chemoradio-/radio therapy. The effect of PEG feeding is uncertain, and it is necessary to consider indications for each case.

Factors Associated with Differences in Physicians' Attitudes toward Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Feeding in Older Adults Receiving End-of-Life Care in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Although percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is still widely practiced in Japan, studies from Western countries report that it is less beneficial for patients in end-of-life care with cognitive decline. Decisions regarding PEG placement are largely influenced by physician judgment. The aim of this study was to investigate the background and perceptions of Japanese physicians regarding PEG for older adults in end-of-life care and to identify the factors associated with differences in physician judgment regarding PEG. The study employed a cross-sectional design. A questionnaire on PEG for older adults in end-of-life care was sent to Japanese physicians. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) of the association between PEG recommendations and each factor. PEG placement was advised for bedridden patients and older adults with cognitive decline by 26% of the physicians who responded to the survey. Differences in physician perceptions of PEG feeding were associated with the recommendation for PEG, benefits of preventing aspiration pneumonia (OR: 4.9; 95% CI: 3.1-8.2), impact on post-discharge accommodation decisions (OR: 6.1; 95% CI: 1.9-30.9), and hesitancy to recommend a PEG placement (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-4.5). Working in a facility with PEG placement (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2-3.5) was an associated background factor. Differences in Japanese physicians' attitudes toward using PEG feeding for older adults in end-of-life care were significantly associated with differences in their perceptions of the impact of PEG feeding and working in a facility with PEG placement.

Moving towards a personalised understanding of the nutritional impact of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) in gastro-oesophageal cancer: A retrospective case note review of a tertiary referral oncology centre.

301 Background: Dysphagia is a common life-impacting complication for patients with gastro-oesophageal (O-G) cancer. Options to alleviate dysphagia include insertion of SEMS or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). SEMS improve quality of life by enabling a person to eat a varied diet, but are associated with complications including pain and need for reintervention. Although studies have shown SEMS improve dysphagia, consequent longitudinal impact on nutritional status has not been evaluated. There is a need to better characterise risks and benefits of SEMS to allow a personalised approach to both insertion and follow-up. Methods: We identified patients with a confirmed diagnosis of O-G cancer, who underwent SEMS insertion at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust in 2021 and 2022. Data was retrospectively collected about patient and stent characteristics, and patient outcomes to quantify benefits and risks of SEMS. Results: 112 patients had 127 SEMS inserted at The Christie. Patients’ International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) score significantly improved after SEMS insertion (N=120); prior to SEMS 62% were only managing liquids and purees (IDDSI 3 and 4) and 24% were not able to eat enterally. Post SEMS, 76% tolerated textured foods (IDDSI 5 and above) and only 21.5% were limited to liquids/purees. We observed a significant reduction in the rate of weight loss (% body weight/10 days) following SEMS insertion (-0.010 ± 0.009 vs. -0.001 ± 0.010, P < 0.001). 12% of patients experienced grade 3 SEMS-related toxicity or stent failure within 30 days, and 20% developed significant pain within 24 hours of SEMS insertion. Conclusions: SEMS provide meaningful nutritional benefit in the majority of patients with O-G cancer, as weight loss is significantly slowed following insertion. However, we identified two groups of patients who did not benefit from SEMS; those who continued to lose weight and those who had stent failure. We did not find predictive factors for stent failure from multivariate analysis of baseline demographics or stent characteristics. Therefore, more detailed analysis of tumour factors, imaging findings and SEMS location from a larger cohort of patients may be required to identify patients who are unlikely to benefit from SEMS, and alternative interventions such as PEG feeding could be considered.

Pre-hospitalization dysphagia and feeding tube placement in nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

Despite research demonstrating the risks of using feeding tubes in persons with advanced dementia, they continue to be placed. The natural history of dysphagia among patients with advanced dementia has not been examined. We conducted a secondary analysis of a national cohort of persons with advanced dementia staying at a nursing home stay before hospitalization to examine (1) pre-hospitalization dysphagia prevalence and (2) risk of feeding tube placement during hospitalization based on preexisting dysphagia. A retrospective cohort study consisting of all nursing home (NH) residents (≥66 years) with advanced dementia (Cognitive Function Scale score ≥2), a hospitalization between 2013-2017, and a Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment within 120 days before hospitalization. Pre-hospitalization dysphagia status and surgically placed feeding tube insertion during hospitalization were determined by MDS 3.0 swallowing items and ICD-9 codes, respectively. A multivariate logistic model clustering on hospital was used to examine the association of dysphagia with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube placement after adjustment for confounders. Between 2013 and 2017, 889,983 persons with NH stay with advanced dementia (mean age: 84.5, SD: 7.5, and 63.5% female) were hospitalized. Pre-hospitalization dysphagia was documented in 5.4% (n = 47,574) and characterized by oral dysphagia (n = 21,438, 2.4%), pharyngeal dysphagia (n = 24,257, 2.7%), and general swallowing complaints/pain (n = 14,928, 1.7%). Overall, PEG feeding tubes were placed in 3529 patients (11.2%) with pre-hospitalization dysphagia, whereas 27,893 (88.8%) did not have pre-hospitalization dysphagia according to MDS 3.0 items. Feeding tube placement risk increased with the number of dysphagia items noted on the pre-hospitalization MDS (6 vs. 0 dysphagia variables: OR = 5.43, 95% CI: 3.19-9.27). Based on MDS 3.0 assessment, only 11% of PEG feeding tubes were inserted in persons with prior dysphagia. Future research is needed on whether this represents inadequate assessment or the impact of potentially reversible intercurrent illness resulting in feeding tube placement.

Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.

Maintaining adequate nutrition is critical for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as motor neuron disease (MND). Enteral tube feeding is offered to people experiencing difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) to prevent weight loss and aspiration pneumonia. Among the types of enteral tube feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the typical procedure offered to people with ALS and will be mainly discussed here. To examine the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or other enteral tube feeding in people with ALS, compared to oral feeds without enteral tube feeding on: 1. survival; 2. nutritional status; 3. quality of life. To examine the incidence of minor and major complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and other enteral tube feeding procedures in people with ALS. On 3 January 2020 and 6 February 2021, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE. Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP. We screened the results to identify randomized controlled studies on enteral tube feeding in ALS. We reviewed all references from the search in published articles to identify any additional references. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cross-over trials evaluating the effectiveness and complications of PEG or other enteral tube feeding placement in ALS. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We found no RCTs or quasi-RCTs comparing the effectiveness of enteral tube feeding versus oral feeds without enteral tube feeding. There are no RCTs or quasi-RCTs to indicate whether enteral tube feeding is effective compared to continuation of oral feeding for any of the outcome measures. Such RCTs are very unlikely to be performed for ethical reasons. RCTs evaluating the effect of different enteral tube insertion techniques and timings of tube placement on survival and quality of life of people with ALS dysphagia are feasible and warranted.

Lived Experiences of People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis With Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Feeding Tubes

Abstract Date Presented 04/22/2023 Lived experiences of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (pALS) who have percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) are explored. Outcomes will provide insight into the factors that guide the decision-making process and the impact on occupation. Primary Author and Speaker: Gioia Ciani Additional Authors and Speakers: Gary Grimaldi, Ian Sarnataro

Nutrition and Outcome of 100 Endoscopic Gastrostomy-Fed Citizens with Severe Dementia.

Dementia is a rising public health concern. Feeding and nutritional problems increase as the disease progresses, affecting the clinical course and caregiver burden. While some guidelines advise against percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and tube feeding in advanced dementia, conflicting evidence exists. This study aims to evaluate the nutritional status and influence of PEG feeding on the outcome and evolution of nutritional/prognosis markers of patients with severe dementia (PWSD) who underwent gastrostomy for nutritional support. We conducted a 16-year retrospective study on 100 PEG-fed PWSD with strong familial support. We evaluated the survival PEG-feeding period, safety, and objective nutritional/prognosis data on the gastrostomy day and after 3 months: Body Mass Index (BMI), Mid Upper Arm Circumference, Tricipital Skinfold, Mid-Arm Muscle Circumference, albumin, transferrin, total cholesterol, and hemoglobin. Most patients presented low values in these nutritional/prognosis parameters. No major life-threatening PEG complications were reported. The mean survival time after gastrostomy was 27.9 months (median of 17 months). Female sex, BMI recovery at 3 months, and higher baseline hemoglobin levels were associated with a reduced risk of death and increased survival time. The study concluded that, in carefully selected PWSD with strong familial support, PEG feeding can improve nutritional status and have a positive impact on survival.

Single centre analysis of perioperative complications in trans-oral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is a modality in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma(OPSCC). This study was conducted to show the rates of peri-operative complications after TORS for OPSCC in our experience. Single centre retrospective analysis of consecutive OPSCC treated with TORS. The surgical complication severity was recorded according to Clavien-Dindo criteria (CDC). Eighty-seven OPSCC were operated with TORS. According to CDC, grade I, grade II and IIIb were registered in 8%, 4.6% and 11.5% of cases, respectively. The postoperative pain, registered with visual-analogue scale (VAS) score, was 8 ± 1.2 for the secondary healing wounds and 6.2 ± 1.5 for the flap reconstructions (p < 0.01). The impact on swallowing function was not significant between secondary healing and flap reconstructions(p = 0.96). Any major or life-threatening intraoperative complications have not been recorded. Only one patient had postoperative bleeding into the neck whilst 13.3% of patients had postoperative bleeding from the primary tumor. No total local or free flap failure were registered. The mean duration of tracheostomy use was 7.4 ± 2.6days, and nasogastric tube 14.3 ± 6.9days. Only one patient, who had also reconstruction with flap, experienced a postoperative severe dysphagia with severe aspiration, needing a permanent tracheostomy tube and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. TORS for OPSCC showed less morbidity, lower risk of severe complication and mortality. Thus, this treatment modality could be offered as first line treatment in selected cases.

Factors Contributing to Complete Oral Intake in Dysphagic Stroke Patients with Enteral Feeding Tubes in Convalescent Rehabilitation Wards

This study investigated the factors contributing to complete oral intake (COI) in dysphagic stroke patients with enteral feeding tubes in the local clinical setting. Data of patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding on admission to convalescent rehabilitation wards (CRWs) were extracted from the Kaga Regional Cooperation Clinical Pathway for Stroke database for multiple centers including 19 acute care hospitals and 11 hospitals with CRWs. Patients were divided into two groups based on their status regarding COI or incomplete oral intake (ICOI) at discharge. Logistic regression analysis with forced-entry variables was used to identify factors contributing to COI. On discharge from CRWs, COI and ICOI were observed in 140 and 207 cases, respectively. The COI group was younger, had a higher rate of initial stroke, higher Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores, higher Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor and cognitive scores, higher Body Mass Index (BMI), lower rate of patients with PEG, and shorter stays in acute care wards. Logistic regression analysis with forced entry revealed that younger age; initial stroke; higher FOIS score, FIM cognitive score, and BMI; and shorter stay in the acute care ward contributed to COI. The primary factors contributing to COI in dysphagic stroke patients with enteral feeding tubes were younger age, initial stroke, higher swallowing and cognitive function, good nutritional status, and shorter stay in the acute care ward.

Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study.

We retrospectively compared the complications, blood biochemical indexes and outcomes in patients with swallowing disturbances receiving nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding and percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG). Among 160 patients, 72 cases received PEG and 88 cases received NGT. All patients were followed up for two years. We collected their clinical data from the medical records. Indicators, such as body mass index (BMI), white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (HGB), complications, including recurrent aspiration pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding, reflux esophagitis, and outcomes (survival or death) were compared between the two groups semi-annually. SAt both six months and one year after receiving treatment, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in indicators, complications and outcomes, with all P >0.05. It can be seen that, when the patients were followed up for one and a half years18 months, ALB was lower in the NGT group (33.81±0.46) compared with the PEG group (36.14±0.50) (P <0.05). After two years of follow-up, differences between the NGT and PEG group could be seen in a variety of indicators, including BMI (20.08±0.27 vs 21.03±0.25), WBC (9.12±0.56 vs 7.08±0.29), ALB (33.11±0.43 vs 35.75±0.49), creatinine (55.07±1.83 vs 63.21±2.94), and the complications, such as aspiration pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding, reflux esophagitis, and electrolyte disorder, in the PEG group were significantly reduced compared to the NGT groupthan that in its counterpart, P <0.05. In the two-year follow-up period, there were 13 and 22 patients died in the PEG group and NGT group, respectively. Both techniques are safe and effective in the short term. However, on a longer-term basis, PEG is shown to be superior to NGT feeding in improving nutrition and preventing common complications for patients with swallowing disturbances.

Comparing the number and length of primary care consultations in people with and without intellectual disabilities and health needs: observational cohort study using electronic health records.

In the United Kingdom, 15-min appointments with the general practitioner (GP) are recommended for people with complex health conditions, including intellectual disabilities and health needs, but we do not know whether this happens. We compared number and length of primary care consultations (GP, nurse, other allied health, other) for people with and without intellectual disabilities and health needs. Linked primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in England were used to investigate face-to-face and telephone primary care consultations in 2017-2019. Health needs investigated were: epilepsy; incontinence; severe visual/hearing impairments; severe mobility difficulties; cerebral palsy; and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. Age and gender-standardized consultation rates per year (Poisson), duration of consultations, and the proportion of "long consultations" (≥15 min) were reported. People with intellectual disabilities (n = 7,794) had 1.9 times as many GP consultations per year as those without (n = 176,807; consultation rate ratio = 1.87 [95% confidence interval 1.86-1.89]). Consultation rates with nurses and allied healthcare professionals were also twice as high. Mean GP consultation time was 9-10 min regardless of intellectual disability/health need status. Long GP consultations were less common in people with intellectual disabilities (18.2% [17.8-18.7] vs. 20.9% [20.8-21.0]). Long consultations with practice nurses were more common in people with health needs, particularly severe visual loss. People with intellectual disabilities and/or health needs tend to have more, rather than longer, GP consultations compared with the rest of the population. We recommend further investigation into the role of practice nurses to support people with intellectual disabilities and health needs.

Analysis of feasibility and outcome of bedside percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus open feeding gastrostomy in head injury patients

BackgroundNutritional care in patients with a severe head injury is of utmost importance, as nutritional deficiency can affect the outcomes in these patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, and an outcome of performing bedside percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in severe head injury patients. This study was conducted in a tertiary care institute. Patients with head injury with a Glasgow coma scale score ≤ 8 were included. Among 50 patients, 25 patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and 25 patients underwent open feeding gastrostomy, within 72 h to up to 3 weeks from admission.ResultsThe commonest subset in the study population was between18 and 30 years age group. Among 50 patients 43 (86%) were men and 7 (14%) were women with the men to women ratio being 6:1. The mean operative time for performing PEG was 12.04 SD 3.72 min, whereas for open feeding gastrostomy was 96.8 SD 9.98 min which was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). The complication rate for the PEG subgroup was 24% and that for feeding gastrostomy was 56% which was statistically significant (P = 0.02).ConclusionsPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a minimally invasive and time-saving procedure, which is superior to open feeding gastrostomy in terms of a prerequisite of anaesthesia, operating room, and few post-operative complications.

Endoscopic management of buried bumper syndrome: the balloon-dilation pull technique.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement facilitates safe and effective enteric feeding in the critically or chronically ill. However, long-term PEG feeding, improper feeding tube care, and potentially smaller or harder discs have been associated with development of buried bumper syndrome in approximately 1.5 % of patients [1] [2] [3] [4]. Although more and more techniques have been described and even dedicated tools developed [1] [2] [3] [4], simple balloon-assisted buried bumper management may carry several advantages [5].

Is Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding Beneficial for Improving Survival in Patients With Dementia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Pieces of Evidence

Dementia is a progressive, disabling neurogenic disease that results in serious nutritional deficiencies included dysphagia, malnutrition, and weight loss. The Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is a long-term enteral feeding method that is routinely used in demented patients with poor food intake as a standard protocol. However, most of the pieces of evidence have not shown the beneficial effects of PEG feeding on complications or survival rates in these patients. Some studies have even reported an increase in mortality. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the mortality rate and survival in primary demented patients with PEG. A systematic search was conducted on Pubmed and Scopus databases up to Aug 2019. The data were reviewed according to the Cochrane handbook and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE). Based on the random-effects model, the mortality rate and median survival were expressed as risk ratio and weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI, respectively. Among 13 included studies, PEG insertion in patients with primary dementia has no significant effect on 30-day, 90-day, 180-day, 1-year, and 2- year mortality rate or median survival (WMD: 9.77; 95% CI: -22.43 to 41.98; P=0.55). It seems that nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding in compared to PEG in this population is more effective. In conclusion, further prospective studies are needed for comprehensive evaluation of mortality or survival regarding comorbidities, underlying disease, cognitive and physical performance, and nutritional problems in demented patients.

Nonrespiratory complications of nusinersen-treated spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients.

Emergence of new treatments for spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) has led to dramatic improvements in respiratory failure and survival. However, these "treated" patients sustain major problems in other organ systems, which may directly or indirectly affect their respiratory function. We observed three main nonrespiratory manifestations in these patients comprised of facial deformities, feeding problems, and spinal deformities. To investigate these three main sequelae in nusinersen-treated SMA1 patients. Data on nusinersen-treated SMA1 patients were prospectively collected throughout a 3-year period, with special focus upon nonrespiratory features of the disease. Twenty nusinersen-treated SMA1 patients were included (eight males, median age 13.5 months, interquartile range: 4-56.2 months), among whom 17 survived after 3 years of follow-up. At follow-up, 15 (88%) patients were diagnosed with facial weakness, hypoplasia, or deformity. All but one patient (94%) were fed invasively by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or nasogastric tube feeding. Four patients (25%) had maintained oral feeding in parallel to gastrostomy feeding and had clinical and radiologic evidence of aspirations. Fifteen (88%) patients were diagnosed with scoliosis, of whom seven had undergone or were scheduled to undergo corrective surgery. Nusinersen-treated SMA1 patients may sustain facial deformities, feeding problems, and severe scoliosis, all of which affect their respiratory system. Strict surveillance of these complications is essential to avoid further respiratory morbidity.

Screening rates and prevalence of osteoporosis in a real-world, Australian systemic sclerosis cohort.

Despite reports of decreased bone mineral density in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in international cohorts, the prevalence of osteoporosis in Australian SSc patients remains unknown. We report rates of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning in an SSc cohort at a tertiary hospital specialized outpatient clinic and the prevalence and associations of osteoporosis in screened patients. We performed retrospective chart review to determine if patients underwent DXA scanning between 2007 and 2018 and extracted lumbar spine and femoral neck T-scores, fracture history, and osteoporosis therapy. Of 244 patients, 104 (42.6%) underwent DXA scanning and among patients in whom T-scores were available (n = 91), 30 (33.0%) had osteoporosis and 48 (52.7%) had osteopenia. Screened patients were more likely to have longer disease duration (19.9 vs 15.2 years, P = 0.002), calcinosis (50.5% vs 36.4%, P = 0.028), myositis (12.6% vs 0.7%, P < 0.001), synovitis (42.7% vs 28.6%, P = 0.022), ever used prednisolone (76.7% vs 47.1%, P < 0.001) or fractures (23.0% vs 0.0%, P < 0.001). Patients with osteoporosis more commonly had a history of nasogastric feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding or intravenous total parenteral nutrition (6.9% vs 0.0%, P = 0.038) and, unexpectedly, less commonly ever used prednisolone (58.6% vs 85.2%, P = 0.005) compared with patients with osteopenia or normal bone density. We identified high rates of osteoporosis among screened Australian SSc patients. Further assessment in larger, prospective studies is needed to establish guidelines for formal osteoporosis screening in SSc patients.

Prophylactic versus reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing radical radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy (RT) for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) is associated with malnutrition due to treatment-related mucositis and dysphagia. While percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding can improve nutrition, it has acute and late complications, including dependence on PEG feeding. We retrospectively evaluated patient outcomes by whether gastrostomy placement was prophylactic (P-G) or reactive to RT complications (R-G). Retrospective analysis of OPSCC patients undergoing curative-intent RT at Waikato Hospital between 2010 and 2015. Of 103 OPSCC patients treated with RT (+/- chemotherapy) 21 had P-G, 15 had R-G and 67 had none (No-G). P-G patients were significantly more likely to be female, older, have higher tumour stage and receive bilateral RT (all p< 0.05). P-G and No-G patients had similar rates and duration of hospital admission for complications during treatment, but both were significantly less than in R-G patients (admission rates 52.3%, 49.3% and 86.7%, and mean length of stay 3.5, 3.3 and 11.9 days, respectively; p< 0.001). R-G patients also had greater RT treatment delays than P-G or No-G patients (mean 1.1, 0.7 and 0.4 days, respectively, p< 0.05). No significant differences were noted between groups in PEG dependence or weight change during, or 1, 3 or 6months after, RT. Weight loss was not significantly different with P-G than R-G despite more frequent use of bilateral RT fields in the former group. P-G placement affords shorter and less frequent hospital admissions than R-G during RT for OPSCC, with no increased complications or gastrostomy-dependence rates.

Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia.

Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy can improve survival outcomes in patients with N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy

ObjectivesOur previous study revealed that percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and intensive nutritional support may minimize body weight loss, maintain nutritional status, and offer better treatment tolerance for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). This study aimed to further explore the potential long-term survival benefits of PEG in LA-NPC. MethodsBetween June 1, 2010 and June 30, 2014, a total of 133 consecutive LA-NPC patients who received prophylactic PEG (pPEG) feeding before the initiation of CCRT were included. Meanwhile, an additional 133 non-PEG patients, who were matched for age; sex; and tumor, node, and metastases stage, were selected as control cohort. The log-rank test was used to compare survival distributions between groups. Multivariate prognosis analysis was conducted using a Cox’s proportional hazards regression model. ResultsAfter a median follow-up time of 81 months (range: 4–119 months), pPEG was not associated with significant survival benefits in the whole cohort. However, the N3 NPC patients who underwent PEG had significantly higher 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (84.0 and 76.0%, respectively) than those who did not undergo PEG (56.7 and 45.6%, respectively; p < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that PEG was an independent factor for N3 survival. ConclusionPEG can maintain the nutritional status and improve the rate of treatment completion for LA-NPC patients who underwent CCRT, and these advantages can transfer into survival benefits in N3 NPC. Further multicenter prospective clinical trials are warranted.