Percutaneous Coronary Artery Research Articles

Lipid management among very-high-risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes

Abstract Background Patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and type 2 diabetes (DM2) often meet very-high-risk (VHR) criteria for recurrent ASCVD events and are recommended for aggressive low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering in guidelines. Purpose Our study aimed to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving guideline-based lipid goals and identify factors associated with achieving these goals among VHR patients with established ASCVD and DM2. Methods Electronic health record data were used to identify VHR patients with established ASCVD and DM2 across 14 large US healthcare systems between 1/1/2022-12/31/2022 with an available LDL-C measurement. We examined the percentage of patients achieving guideline-based lipid goals based on the 2018 AHA/ACC Multisociety Guideline, defined as either having an LDL-C <70 mg/dL or receiving maximal lipid-lowering therapy (i.e., on a PCSK9i monoclonal antibody (mAb)) at the time of the last LDL-C test, and performed multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with the achievement of those goals. Results Among 213,380 eligible VHR patients with ASCVD and DM2 (mean age 70.2 years, 42% women), 51.8% (110,452) patients achieved guideline-based lipid goals. This included 50.9% with an LDL-C <70 mg/dL and 1.7% on a PCSK9i mAb. Female sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.66), Black race (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.63-0.72), Medicaid insurance (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97), and non-coronary artery disease forms of ASCVD including peripheral artery disease (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65-0.69) and cerebrovascular disease (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.83) were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving guideline-based lipid goals. Conversely, having undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.19-1.43) or coronary artery bypass graft (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.45) in the previous year, and comorbidities including dialysis (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.23-1.55), atrial fibrillation or flutter (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06-1.12), and systolic heart failure (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08-1.14) were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving these goals. Overall, 24.0% of patients were on no statin, 27.2% were on a low- or moderate-intensity statin, and only 5.8% were on a statin in combination with ezetimibe or a PCSK9i mAb. Conclusion Large gaps in care exist for VHR patients with ASCVD and DM2, particularly among women, Black individuals, and those with Medicaid. Targeted interventions are needed to improve the uptake of evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in these patients.

Lipoprotein (a), coronary artery disease risk, and MACE in individuals without standard modifiable risk factors in the UK Biobank

Abstract Background A significant proportion of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) lack standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs; smoking, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes and hypertension), for example with recent analyses demonstrating that around 25% of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction are SMuRF-less(1). With continued focus on primary prevention in cardiovascular disease, the SMuRF-less subset is likely to increase over time. A body of evidence has implicated lipoprotein (a) in CAD, but no such studies have investigated this association in a purely SMuRF-less population. Purpose To investigate the role of lipoprotein (a) in predicting CAD risk and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a large, SMuRF-less cohort. Methods The UK Biobank is a large prospective multicentre study which recruited over 500,000 participants in the UK aged 37-73 years at entry between 2006-2010. SMuRFs were defined as 1) smoking (current or historical), 2) hypercholesterolaemia – lipid lowering medication on enrolment or total cholesterol >5.5mmol/L or LDL-C >3.5mmol/L, 3) previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, or HbA1c >48mmol/mol, 4) previous diagnosis of hypertension. MACE was defined as a composite of coronary artery disease – previous myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery –, stroke, or all-cause mortality. Results Of the total UK Biobank cohort, 46,139 participants were identified as SMuRF-less together with a valid lipoprotein (a) level. Median follow-up duration was 12yrs. In univariate analyses (Table 1), there was no significant difference in lipoprotein (a) concentrations between individuals with and without MACE (16.9 vs. 17.1nmol/L respectively, p = 0.913). The overall event rate was low, with just 3% MACE (1381 events) overall. Older age, male gender, apolipoprotein A, apolipoprotein B, HbA1c level, HDL cholesterol level and body mass index were all associated with MACE. In regard to all-cause mortality alone, there was no association with lipoprotein (a) level, although the other aforementioned parameters were all significantly associated with this outcome. Similarly, lipoprotein (a) was not a significant predictor of stroke. However, there was a large difference in lipoprotein (a) levels between patients with and without CAD (27.2 vs. 17.1nmol/L respectively, p = 0.004). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, lipoprotein (a) level above the 77th percentile (60.3nmol/L) was significantly associated with CAD (p=0.032). In Cox regression models, despite the low event rate, lipoprotein (a) was a significant predictor of CAD (HR 1.00-1.01, p=0.01), and importantly the only potentially modifiable parameter (N = 39,433, 111 events, Table 2). Conclusion Lipoprotein (a) independently predicts CAD in those without SMuRFs, highlighting the importance of checking this parameter in such patients, particularly given the novel antisense technologies in development which may lower lipoprotein (a)(2).Univariate analysesCox regression for CAD

Global variations in coronary revascularisation and acute myocardial infarction mortality between 2006-2020: a longitudinal, population-level analysis of 16 high-income nations from the OECD database

Abstract Background Revascularisation options for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) includes either, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Whilst PCI remains the preferred choice in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)(1), several landmark trials have questioned its universal superiority (2,3), thus prompting re-evaluation of guidelines. A wide-scale contemporary overview of revascularisation trends is lacking. Purpose To examine the evolving pattern in PCI and CABG rates, alongside mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) across a group of 16 high-income countries between 2006 and 2020. Methods Standardized PCI and CABG procedure rates alongside AMI age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) were obtained from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database. Data from 2006-2020 was extracted for; Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom (UK). Together, these countries are commonly known as the European Union (EU) 15+ and represent a cluster of high-income nations with comparable levels of health expenditure. Procedural trends including the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) were evaluated using Joinpoint analysis whilst Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) models was used to analysis trends in AMI mortality. Results Over 15 years, 14.0 million PCI and 2.8 million CABG procedures were recorded in total. PCI rates varied amongst nations (Figure 1), however showed an overall increase in 11 countries, led by Finland (+36.0%). The steepest increase was observed in France between 2012-2018 (EAPC 5.4, 95% CI: 4.8 – 6.1). The greatest overall decrease in PCI was observed in Luxemburg (-33.5%). The fastest decrease was seen during 2018-2020 in the UK (EAPC -7.2, 95% CI: -9.7 – -4.6). CABG rates declined overall in 15 countries (Figure 1), with Luxembourg (-71.3%), experiencing the largest fall and showing the steepest decline between 2014-2018 (EAPC -20.7, 95% CI: -28.3 – -12.3). Ireland was the only country to show an increase in CABG rate (+16.3%). Throughout the study period, the PCI-to-CABG ratio increased (Figure 2A), whilst AMI mortality decreased consistently across all countries (Figure 2B). Conclusion Despite evidence supporting CABG over PCI in specific scenarios, CABG rates have declined, and PCI rates have increased. This trend may be influenced by several factors including patient preference for less invasive procedures and advancements in interventional techniques. The varied use of PCI among these nations, alongside a sustained decline in AMI mortality rates, may be expected given the importance of optimal medical therapy in the management of IHD. The results further highlight the significance of factors beyond revascularisation in driving improved outcomes.PCI and CABG rates between 2006 and 2020PCI to CABG ratio and AMI mortality rate

Lipid lowering therapy and the unmet targets in Indian patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease: results from the OLS registry

Abstract Introduction The Lipid Association of India (LAI) 2020 guidelines classify patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in either very high-risk or extreme-risk groups and recommend that intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) should be administered to such patients to achieve a target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level below 50 mg/dl at least (preferably < 30 mg/dl in extreme risk groups). Purpose This study aimed to assess the achievement of the LAI-recommended LDL-C goals in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods The Optimization of LDL-C in the Stable CAD (OLS) registry started in August 2023 in 10 interventional cardiology centers across Northern India. Interventional cardiologists (ICs) were treating all enrolled patients with angiographically proven stable CAD, and data were collected at a single visit, including the most recent LDL-C and the LLT in the preceding three months of that LDL-C reading. The primary outcome was achieving the LAI-recommended LDL-C goal of <50 mg/dl. The achievement of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) recommended goal of <70 mg/dl was also assessed. Results A total of 1860 patients with angiographically proven CAD were enrolled in this ongoing registry over four months (August 2023- November 2023). The mean age of the study population was 60.2 + 9.2 years, and 79% were males. 30.3% of patients had Diabetes mellitus (DM), 36.1% had hypertension (HTN), 42.3% were obese (body mass index > 25kg/m2), and 17.8% of patients were current smokers. 74.2% of patients had a history of myocardial infarction, while 76.7% had undergone prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Rosuvastatin was the statin prescribed in 59.4% of patients, while atorvastatin was prescribed in 37.2%. 1270 (68.3%) of patients were taking high-intensity statin (HIS) therapy (either 20-40 mg rosuvastatin or 40-80 mg atorvastatin). Only 22 (1.2%) patients took other lipid-lowering agents, including ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and fibrates. None of the patients were using PCSK9 Inhibitors. Only 482(25.9%) patients achieved their LAI recommended goal of LDL-C <50 mg/dl, 113(6.1%) achieved LDL-C < 30 mg/dl, while 863(46.4%) achieved ACC goal of <70 mg/dl. Notably, only 62(3.3%) patients were not taking any lipid-lowering treatment. Conclusion Results of the OLS study demonstrate the high-risk status of CAD in Indian patients with a high prevalence of DM, HTN, and obesity. Most patients were post-PCI/CABG, mainly because ICs did enrolments. More than two-thirds of patients were taking HIS and very few were not taking any treatment. Despite this, only one-fourth of patients achieved the target LDL-C goals. Greater and early utilization of combination LLT, including HIS and non-statin LLT, is likely needed to reduce these gaps for patients at the highest risk.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary arterial bypass grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD), defined as a stenosis of >50%, is a potentially lethal condition that should be treated intensively by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) depending on the anatomy. The presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) complicates LMCAD, acting as a potential worsening factor for this group of patients, as well as impairing the effectiveness and outcomes of both revascularization treatments. Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to comprehensively compare the outcomes of PCI and CABG in patients with LMCAD and CKD. Methods A systematic search of the available literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Studies that compared PCI versus CABG in patients with LMCAD and CKD were included. The primary endpoints comprised major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause death, while secondary endpoints included components of MACCE, such as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and new revascularization events. The results were qualitatively and quantitatively synthesized and pooled hazard ratios (HR) were calculated. The statistical analysis was conducted in R. Results A total of 767 titles were initially retrieved, with five studies finally included in the analysis (n = 2,337 patients). The pooled analysis revealed that patients treated with PCI experienced more MACCE (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.26-1.78, p < 0.001), an outcome primarily driven by MI (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.17-2.62, p = 0.01) and revascularization rates (Hazard Ratio: 3.66, 95% CI: 1.84-7.30, p < 0.001), while no significant difference was shown in stroke rates (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.40-1.22, p = 0.21). A trend towards increased all-cause death was observed for the PCI group, although this outcome slightly failed to reach statistical significance (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.00-1.68, p = 0.05). Conclusion The present systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that PCI appears inferior to CABG in patients with LMCAD and CKD, with respect to most long-term outcomes. This includes higher rates of MACCE, and particularly MI and new events of revascularization for patients undergoing PCI, while all-cause death was marginally higher for this group. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to provide more robust evidence for guiding revascularization strategies in this high-risk population.

Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in women with severe coronary artery disease

Abstract Background The optimal revascularization strategy for severe coronary artery disease (CAD) in women remains controversial. Despite differences between women and men in the development of CAD, there remains a paucity of comparative real-world observational evidence comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in women. Purpose We evaluated short and long-term outcomes of PCI and CABG in women with severe CAD. Methods We conducted a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using linked clinical and administrative databases in Ontario, Canada to obtain records of women with left main, 3-vessel disease, or 2-vessel disease with proximal left anterior descending artery involvement undergoing PCI or CABG from April 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2021. Patients who were >80 years of age and patients who underwent urgent or emergent procedures were excluded for the primary analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, and death (MACCE). Secondary outcomes included the individual components of MACCE and a composite of readmission for MI, heart failure, and stroke. Following multiple imputation and propensity score-matching, the Cox proportional hazards model and Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model with robust variance estimators accounting for death as a competing risk were used to evaluate long-term outcomes. Results In the primary cohort, 2469 patients underwent PCI and 3,721 patients underwent CABG. After propensity score matching, including by coronary disease territory, 2,033 well-balanced pairs were identified, with standardized mean differences <0.10 for all covariates. In-hospital death and stroke were significantly lower with PCI than with CABG (0.7% vs 1.5%, p=0.036) and (<0.2% vs 1.4%, p<0.001), respectively, and there was no difference in perioperative MI between PCI and CABG (1.1% vs 0.6%, p=0.121). At a median (IQR) of 5.1 (2.9-7.5) years, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was higher with PCI compared with CABG (37.7% vs 23.3%, HR 1.79, [95% CI: 1.66-1.91], p<0.001) (Figure 1). All-cause mortality was higher with PCI compared with CABG (17.8% vs 13.4%, HR 1.33, [95% CI: 1.21-1.45], p<0.001) (Figure 2). The composite readmission outcome (MI, heart failure, stroke) was higher with PCI compared with CABG (16.2% vs 11.2%, HR 1.42, [95% CI: 1.37-1.48], p<0.001). Conclusion In women with severe CAD, CABG appears to be associated with a long-term reduction in MACCE and mortality compared with PCI. Our findings provide evidence to suggest women with severe CAD may derive greater long-term benefit from CABG compared to PCI and suggest that the treatment recommendation should shift towards CABG in appropriately selected women.Figure 1.MACCE free survivalFigure 2.Overall survival

Cardiovascular outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with cancer: a statewide population-linkage study

Abstract Background Advances in oncology treatment have led to an increase in the number of cancer survivors. As a result, the number of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with cancer is increasing and the outcomes of these patients are not well described. Purpose This study aimed to examine revascularisation strategies and all cause and cardiovascular death in ACS patients with and without cancer. Methods Hospitalised patients in New South Wales, Australia, from July 2006 to December 2020 with a primary diagnosis of ACS were identified from the statewide Admitted Patient Data Collection database. Patients were stratified into those with or without a history of cancer (non-melanoma skin cancers excluded). Propensity scoring matching (PSM) for the variables of age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors was performed with each cancer patient matched to two non-cancer patients. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the hazard ratios of all-cause mortality between individuals with a history of cancer in the 5 years preceding their hospital admission, and those without. Additionally, Fine-Gray competing risk analysis was performed for cardiovascular death with non-cardiovascular mortality as the competing event. Results During the study period, 193,848 patients were admitted with ACS. 12,543 patients had a history of cancer and were PSM to 25,085 patients without cancer. The median age was 75 (Q1-Q3 67-82) years with 69% male and hypertension the most prevalent risk factor (55%) (Table 1). ACS patients with cancer had clinically comparable, rates of percutaneous revascularisation (36 vs 37%, p=0.07) and coronary artery bypass grafting (11 vs 13%, p<0.001) with ACS patients without cancer. During a median follow up of 8.6 (95% CI 8.4-8.8) years, ACS patients with a history of cancer had a significant higher risk of all cause death (HR 1.42 95% CI [1.38-1.46]) and cardiovascular death (SHR 1.14 [1.11-1.18]). The cumulative incidence function demonstrated cardiovascular death in those with a cancer history occurred in 20% by approximately 1.4 years follow up compared to 2.5 years in those without cancer (Figure 1). Conclusion ACS patients with cancer have a higher risk of all cause death and cardiovascular death compared to those without a history of cancer with clinically comparably revascularisation rates. Further studies to determine the cause of increased cardiovascular death in ACS patients with cancer are required.Figure 1

Recent trends of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control and lipid-lowering therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Taiwan: 2015–2020

ObjectiveThis study aimd to assess recent trends in the control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the utilization of lipid-lowering drugs (LLD) among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in Taiwan. MethodsPatients with ASCVD and without a history of hemorrhagic stroke were identified from the Taiwanese Secondary Prevention for patients with AtheRosCLErotic disease (T-SPARCLE) Registry. ASCVD patients were stratified into four categories: those who ever had acute coronary syndrome (ACS), those who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (PCI/CABG) without ACS, those who ever had an ischemic stroke (IS) without ACS or PCI/CABG, and other ASCVD cases. We assessed their latest recorded LDL-C levels for the periods 2015–16, 2017–18, and 2019–20. LLD therapy patterns were presented as monotherapy, dual therapy, or combination therapy of three or more drugs, with statin use classified by intensity. ResultsWe identified 3831 ASCVD patients in 2015–16, 3531 in 2017–18, and 1231 in 2019–20. LLD utilization rose from 58.4% in 2015–16 to 73.2% in 2019–20. The proportions of patients achieving LDL-C goals in 2015–16, 2017–18, and 2019–20 were 21.5%, 25.8%, and 33.3% in the ACS cohort (goal <70 mg/dL); 20.4%, 26.1%, and 39.0% in the PCI/CABG cohort (goal <70 mg/dL); 54.4%, 58.5%, and 58.9% in the IS cohort (goal <100 mg/dL); and 60.0%, 65.5%, and 67.0% in the other ASCVD cohort (goal <100 mg/dL), respectively. Over half of the patients were prescribed moderate-intensity statins. Statin use, age, history of diabetes mellitus, and hypertension were important factors for attaining LDL-C goal in ACS patients. ConclusionDespite improvements in LDL-C management observed over recent years, significant gaps remain in guideline adherence, especially for patients with ACS or PCI/CABG in Taiwan, with over 60% not meeting LDL-C targets. Intensifying efforts to align clinical practice with guidelines are imperative.

Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers in Predicting Coronary Complexity: Insights from the SYNTAX II Score in NSTEMI Patients.

Objectives: Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is characterized by the absence of pathological ST segment elevation but an increase in biological markers. The SYNTAX II score (SS-II) is calculated to evaluate the complexity of coronary artery disease and to guide treatment decisions between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship of socio-demographic data and biochemical markers with SS-II in NSTEMI patients. Materials and Methods: Six hundred patients who were admitted to the private Aktif International Hospital cardiology clinic between January 2020 and January 2024 and were diagnosed with NSTEMI were included in the study. Severity, extent, and clinical evaluation of atherosclerosis were determined using risk factors, laboratory tests, and coronary angiography. Patients were divided into two groups according to their SS-II score: low (≤ 22) and high SS-II (> 32). Socio-demographic data, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and monocyte-to-HDL-C ratio (MHR) were compared between the two groups. Results: Group 1 (SS-II ≤ 22) included 380 patients, and group 2 (SS-II > 32) included 220 patients. There was a statistically significant difference in HDL, creatine value, white blood cell, troponin I, hs-TnT, and monocyte values in group 2 compared with group 1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.018, p = 0.031, and p = 0.001, respectively). NLR, MLR, MHR, and SS values were statistically significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (p = 0.015, p = 0.002, p = 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively). The risk factors were found to be significantly associated with high-risk NSTEMI (SS-II > 32) in a logistic regression analysis and included peripheral artery disease (PAD) (OR: 3.028, p = 0.040), troponin I (OR: 3.575, p = 0.015), hs-TnT (OR: 4.221, p = 0.010), NLR (OR: 1.528, p = 0.024). MLR (OR: 5.248, p = 0.012), and MHR (OR: 7.122, p = 0.010). ROC analysis revealed that NLR (AUC: 0.691, p = 0.016), MLR (AUC: 0.731, p = 0.004), and MHR (AUC: 0.824, p = 0.003) had higher predictive power than other parameters in patients with high-risk NSTEMI (SS-II > 32). Conclusions: We found that NLR, MLR, and MHR levels are associated with the severity of coronary artery disease. We think that adding these easily and quickly measurable parameters to routine laboratory results may support the clinician in evaluating the complexity of coronary artery disease and guiding treatment decisions in NSTEMI patients.

Addressing disparities in the long-term mortality risk in individuals with non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) by diabetes mellitus status: a nationwide cohort study.

The aim of this study was to investigate how diabetes mellitus affects longer term outcomes in individuals presenting to hospital with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We analysed data from 456,376 adults hospitalised between January 2005 and March 2019 with NSTEMI from the UK Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, linked with Office for National Statistics death reporting. We compared outcomes and quality of care by diabetes status. Individuals with diabetes were older (median age 74 vs 73 years), were more often of Asian ethnicity (13% vs 4%) and underwent revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) (38% vs 40%) less frequently than those without diabetes. The mortality risk for those with diabetes compared with those without was significantly higher at 30 days (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15, 1.23), 1 year (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.26, 1.31), 5 years (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.34, 1.38) and 10 years (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.36, 1.42). In individuals with diabetes, higher quality inpatient care, assessed by opportunity-based quality indicator (OBQI) score category ('poor', 'fair', 'good' or 'excellent'), was associated with lower mortality rates compared with poor care (good: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.73, 0.76; excellent: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.68, 0.71). In addition, compared with poor care, excellent care in the diabetes group was associated with the lowest mortality rates in the diet-treated and insulin-treated subgroups (diet-treated: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.61, 0.68; insulin-treated: HR 0.69, CI 0.66, 0.72). Individuals with diabetes experience disparities during inpatient care following NSTEMI. They have a higher risk of long-term mortality than those without diabetes, and higher quality inpatient care may lead to better long-term survival.

Comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting for left main stenosis on the basis of current regional registry evidence

ObjectivesThere is an ongoing debate whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the better choice for treatment of left main (LM) stenosis. We aimed to provide external validation for the recently reviewed guideline recommendations for invasive LM therapy by evaluating the impact of CABG or PCI on long-term survival from local reports of different regions in the world. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to address contemporary registry studies comparing PCI and CABG for patients with LM stenosis. MethodsThree databases were assessed. Our primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke, and periprocedural mortality. Reconstruction of time-to-event data was performed. ResultsA total of 2477 studies were retrieved. Seven studies with risk-adjusted populations were selected for the analysis. Four studies favored CABG and 3 studies showed no difference for the primary end point. Compared with PCI, patients who underwent CABG had lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.26, P < .01) and MACE (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.69, P < .01) during follow-up. Moreover, PCI was associated with more myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, but less strokes when compared with CABG. There was no significant difference regarding periprocedural mortality. The MACE rate was lower after CABG in both early and late phase, which outweighs the higher rate of periprocedural stroke after CABG. ConclusionsRegional registry evidence supports the current notion of superior long-term endpoints with CABG compared with PCI for the treatment of LM stenosis over time.

TCT-98 A Study to Exhibit Percutaneous Coronary Artery Dilation With Non-Slip Element Balloon (EXPANSE-PTCA)

TCT-98 A Study to Exhibit Percutaneous Coronary Artery Dilation With Non-Slip Element Balloon (EXPANSE-PTCA)

Reduction in the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy using enhanced external counter-pulsation in patients with chronic kidney disease

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of EECP in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods A prospective trial was undertaken in the participants. A total of 280 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 who underwent percutaneous coronary artery procedures were enrolled and divided into two groups: the control group (n = 100) and the EECP group (n = 180). All patients received extracellular fluid volume expansion therapy with 0.9% normal saline, and patients in the EECP groups were also treated with EECP. The renal function indexes of the two groups were determined 48–72 h after coronary artery procedures. Results In the EECP group, the BUN and serum creatinine (Scr) after coronary artery procedures were significantly lower than those before coronary artery procedures (BUN: 8.4 ± 3.5 vs. 6.6 ± 2.7 mmol/L, p < 0.001; Scr: 151.9 ± 44.7 vs. 144.5 ± 48.3 μmol/L, p < 0.001), while the eGFR was significantly increased (43.6 ± 11.4 vs. 47.1 ± 13.9 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.001). The degree of Scr elevation was lower in the EECP group than in the control group (12.4 ± 15.0 vs. 20.9 ± 24.8 μmol/L, p = 0.026). Additionally, the EECP group had a lower incidence of post-procedures Scr elevation than the control group (36.5 vs. 48.0%, p = 0.042), a higher incidence of post-procedures eGFR elevation (62.2 vs. 48.0%, p = 0.021), and a lower risk of CIN (1.1 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.019). Conclusion EECP therapy has a protective effect on renal function and can reduce the risk of CIN in patients with CKD.

Pressure-responsive pH-triggered layer-by-layer coating of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters for instant high-dose drug delivery for percutaneous coronary artery intervention

Pressure-responsive pH-triggered layer-by-layer coating of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters for instant high-dose drug delivery for percutaneous coronary artery intervention

Coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndromes: modern indications and approaches.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with approximately 1.2 million hospitalizations annually in the U.S. This review aims to explore the contemporary evidence regarding revascularization strategies, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in ACS patients. It also addresses the unresolved questions concerning the optimal procedural aspects of surgery and antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention postsurgery. Recent studies highlight that while PCI is generally preferred for its timeliness in high-risk non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) patients, CABG offers a benefit in terms of cardiovascular events in those with multivessel disease, particularly in the presence of diabetes and higher coronary disease complexity. For ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), CABG is less frequently utilized due to the preference for primary PCI, but it remains crucial for patients with complex anatomy or failed PCI. Furthermore, the optimal timing and type of antiplatelet therapy post-CABG remain controversial, with current evidence supporting the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to reduce ischemic events but necessitating careful management to balance bleeding risks. In patients with ACS, the choice between PCI and CABG depends on the complexity of coronary disease and patient comorbidities. CABG is particularly beneficial for multivessel disease in NSTE-ACS and specific STEMI cases where PCI is not feasible. The management of antiplatelet therapy postsurgery requires a nuanced approach to minimize bleeding risks while preventing thrombotic complications. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to solidify these findings and guide clinical practice.

Hospital and Physician Variability in Revascularization Decisions and Outcomes for Patients With 3-Vessel and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Hospital- and physician-level variation for selection of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with coronary artery disease has been associated with outcome differences. However, most studies excluded patients treated medically. From 2010 to 2019, adults with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease at 3 hospitals (A, B, C) in Alberta, Canada, were categorized by treatment with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, or CABG. Multilevel regression models determined the proportion of variation in treatment attributable to patient, physician, and hospital factors, and survival models assessed outcomes including death and major adverse cardiovascular events over 5 years. Of 22 580 patients (mean age, 67 years; 80% men): 6677 (29%) received medical management, 9171 (41%) percutaneous coronary intervention, and 6732 (30%) CABG. Hospital factors accounted for 10.8% of treatment variation. In adjusted models (site A as reference), patients at sites B and C had 49% (95% CI, 44%-53%) and 43% (95% CI, 37%-49%) lower rates of medical therapy, respectively, and 31% (95% CI, 24%-38%) and 32% (95% CI, 24%-40%) lower rates of CABG. During 5.0 years median follow-up, 3287 (14.6%) patients died, with no intersite mortality differences. There were no between-site differences in acute coronary syndromes or stroke; patients at sites B and C had 24% lower risk (95% CI, 13%-34% and 11%-35%, respectively) of heart failure hospitalization. Hospital-level variation in selection of percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG, or medical therapy for patients with complex coronary artery disease was not associated with differences in 5-year mortality rates. Research and quality improvement initiatives comparing revascularization practices should include medically managed patients.

Association of plasma endothelin-1 levels with revascularization strategies and short-term clinical outcomes: Role of diabetes

Mortality rate due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is elevated among diabetes mellitus (DM) compared to non-DM patients. Endothelin 1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictor, is implicated in the pathophysiology of both CAD and DM. The impact of ET-1 on the short-term clinical outcomes following revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) remains unclear. We investigated the impact of ET-1 on clinical outcomes and revascularization strategies in CAD patients, exploring the role of DM on modifying these relationships. In a prospective observational study, patients presenting to cardiac catheterization lab for CAD evaluation at a Jordanian hospital were enrolled and stratified by status of CAD and DM. Plasma levels of ET-1 were measured before catheterization. Short-term clinical outcomes and prognosis were compared.Among 815 enrolled patients (603 CAD and 212 controls), DM prevalence was higher among CAD patients than non-CAD. Plasma ET-1 levels were measured in 490 random patients and were associated with CAD and the need for revascularization. Multivariate analysis independently revealed higher plasma ET-1 levels in DM patients requiring revascularization. Short-term follow-up for 366 patients (median of 4 months) showed that 132 developed one cerebro/cardiovascular event, predominantly among DM patients. Baseline ET-1 was not associated with higher risk of the first event. Notably, revascularization by PCI was associated with lower event risk in DM patients.Our study indicates that plasma ET-1 levels are associated with the need for revascularization in DM patients, with those undergoing PCI having a lower risk of initial cerebro/cardiovascular events.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Early Invasive Procedures for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Low-Income Regions: A Prospective Cohort Study in Pakistan.

Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity globally, necessitating effective intervention strategies. Early invasive procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are often recommended for high-risk patients. However, their cost-effectiveness in low-income regions remains uncertain, particularly in Pakistan, where healthcare resources are limited. Objective This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early invasive procedures compared to standard care for ACS in low-income regions of Pakistan. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study from January 1, 2021, to January 31, 2021, at four major hospitals in Pakistan: Army Cardiac Center Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Lahore, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Karachi, Lady Reading Hospital in Peshawar, and Mardan Medical Complex. The participants included 436 patients diagnosed with ACS aged 18 years or older and presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset. The patients were divided into two groups: the early invasive procedure group (n = 218) and the standard care group (n = 218). The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included recurrent myocardial infarctions, hospital readmissions, healthcare costs, and procedural complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY), employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results The early invasive procedure group showed a mortality rate of 18 (8%) compared to 33 (15%) in the standard care group, demonstrating a significant reduction in mortality (p = 0.01). Additionally, the average healthcare cost was significantly lower in the early invasive group, with mean costs of Pakistani rupee (PKR) 187,200 (US dollar {USD} 1,200) compared to PKR 280,800 (USD 1,800) in the standard care group (p < 0.01). Recurrent myocardial infarctions occurred in 11 (5%) of the early invasive group versus 26 (12%) in the standard care group (p < 0.05). Hospital readmission rates were lower in the early invasive group, 22 (10%) compared to 39 (18%) in the standard care group (p < 0.05). Healthcare costs were significantly lower in the early invasive group, with mean costs of PKR 187,200 (USD 1,200) compared to PKR 280,800 (USD 1,800) in the standard care group (p < 0.01). Conclusion Early invasive procedures for ACS significantly improve survival rates, reduce complications, and lower healthcare costs in low-income regions of Pakistan. These findings suggest that such strategies should be considered in resource-limited settings to optimize patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization.

Significance of diabetes mellitus status in patients undergoing percutaneous left main coronary artery intervention.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a modifiable risk factor for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Treatment with insulin correlates with advanced disease and has been associated with excess cardiovascular risk, but evidence on outcomes of patients with insulin-treated DM (ITDM) undergoing left main percutaneous coronary intervention (LMPCI) remains scarce. The aim of the presented study is to evluate the risk attributable to DM and ITDM in patients undergoing LMPCI. We included 869 patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCAD. The cohort was divided into three subgroups based on diabetic status: No DM, ITDM, and Non-ITDM. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke at 1 year. Results were adjusted for clinically relevant baseline characteristics. Amongst participants, 58.7% had no DM, 25.9% non-ITDM, and 15.4% ITDM. Diabetics were younger and more likely to be female. They also exhibited higher body mass index as well as prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, anemia, and chronic kidney disease. The number of bifurcation lesions and stents used was similar between groups. At 1 year, when compared to no DM, ITDM (25.4% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.01) but not non-ITDM (10.8% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.94) demonstrated higher MACCE. This finding was driven by increased risk of MI. Mortality was 8.4%, 7.8%, and 17.2% for no DM, Non-ITDM, and ITDM, respectively. Results remained unchanged after adjustment. In a rather contemporary patient population undergoing PCI for LMCAD, ITDM but not non-ITDM was associated with higher risk of 1-year MACCE, primarily driven by MI.

Polymorphism rs662 (Q192R) of paraoxonase-1 and susceptibility to atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries.

The present study concerns a connection of the Q192RPON1 polymorphism with atherosclerosis requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the Polish population. A total of 282 individuals who underwent coronary angiography took part in this study. The polymorphism was determined with the PCR-RFLP method. The odds ratio for atherosclerosis in carriers of the 192RR genotype was 2.50 (p = 0.002). The median HDL-C concentration was significantly lower in the study group than the control group (p = 0.02). The presence of the 192RR genotype and 192R allele are indicative of at least a two-fold increased risk of atherosclerosis requiring PCI or CABG in the Polish population.