Perceptions Of Team Members Research Articles

Embedding responsible innovation into R&D practices: A case study of socially assistive robot development

The Responsible Innovation (RI) approach aims to transform research and development (R&D) into being more anticipatory, inclusive, reflective, and responsive. This study highlights the challenges of embedding RI in R&D practices. We fostered collective learning on RI in a socially assistive robot development project through applying participatory action research (PAR). In the PAR, we employed a mixed-methods approach, combining interviews, workshops, and online questionnaires, to collectively explore opportunities for RI, and elicit team member perceptions, opinions, and beliefs about RI. Our PAR led to some modest yet purposeful, deliberate efforts to address particular concerns regarding, for instance, privacy, control, and energy consumption. However, we also found that the embedding of RI in R&D practices can be hampered by four partly interrelated barriers: lack of an action perspective, the noncommittal nature of RI, the misconception that co-design equals RI, and limited integration between different R&D task groups. In this paper, we discuss the implications of these barriers for R&D teams and funding bodies, and we recommend PAR as a solution to address these barriers.

Primary care team member’s perceptions of credentialed and privileged clinic pharmacists and impact on clinic workload in a pediatric primary care network

BackgroundPharmacists provide increased access to care, vaccinations, and medication management for patients. Credentialing and privileging of pharmacists allow pharmacists to practice at the top of their licenses and elevate pharmacy practice. ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study was to assess the perception of health care team members of credentialed and privileged pharmacists working in a pediatric primary care network (PCN) before and after implementation of pharmacist privileges. The secondary objective was to determine team members’ perceptions on the amount of time spent refilling medications, resolving medication access issues, and ordering vaccines before and after implementation of pharmacist privileges. MethodsThis was a prospective pre-post study using surveys to capture health care team members’ perceptions of credentialed and privileged ambulatory care pharmacists. Surveyed participants included attending physicians, advanced practice nurses, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, medical assistants, and patient care assistants. Summary statistics are reported as frequencies and percentages. Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4. ResultsFifty-eight preprivileging and 56 postprivileging surveys were distributed. The return rate was 79.3% (n = 46) for preprivileging and 80.4% (n = 45) for postprivileging surveys. More than 90% of respondents had a favorable perception of credentialed and privileged pharmacists in the clinic. There was a significant difference in the perception of the amount of time spent on medication access issues after pharmacist privileges were implemented (P = 0.0296). ConclusionCredentialed and privileged pharmacists in a pediatric PCN are viewed favorably by clinic team members and can have a positive impact on clinic workload.

Learning together: A mixed methods analysis of team-based learning in mathematics

To provide meaningful, high-quality learning experiences for students with diverse academic backgrounds, a critical consideration for mathematics educators is student engagement. The approach of team-based learning has allowed for an increase in student-centered class time and demonstrated positive results in tertiary education across multiple disciplines. However, this approach has been primarily used at the tertiary level and has not yet been empirically examined in middle school mathematics. Our mixed methods study of team-based learning in an eighth-grade mathematics class examined the influence of students’ team type (i.e., mixed sex, same-sex) and perceptions of team members’ contributions on students’ engagement in their mathematics class. Results of the study provide evidence for the positive effect of team-based learning on engagement as well as support for the critical role of peer interactions. Our findings provide implications for implementing team-based learning in secondary mathematics education for educators and researchers.

Inclusion and Diversity in Healthcare Organizations’ Teams

Abstract Inclusion and diversity (D&I) are an integral part of an organization’s success in today’s world due to the impact they can have on employees and managers in all fields of activity. Teams and organizations are shaped and changed in ways that were not considered years ago. The review of the literature showed what D&I are, the differences between the two, and the impact on organizations worldwide, as well as in Romanian organizations. The research goal is the analysis of the differences in perception of manager and team members regarding D&I in healthcare/clinical research organizations, since one of the values of the organization analyzed is inclusion. The research method used for this study is quantitative research using a self-administered questionnaire, with structured questions. The 53 responses received were processed with Mann-Whitney nonparametric test in IBM SPSS Statistics software. The results showed that managers put greater emphasis on D&I than team members. Considering the global structure of the organization, the aspects of D&I have a great importance within management teams, their effects being able to influence team performance, the motivation of their members, and especially employees’ retention. The findings underscore the managerial implications, particularly those within the healthcare sector, in prioritizing and actively cultivating diversity and inclusive environments. In addition, research contributes to the theoretical background by providing empirical evidence that substantiates and enriches existing theoretical frameworks related to organizational inclusivity.

Perceptions of theatre team members to robotic assisted surgery and the aid of technology in colorectal surgery.

The implementation of robotic assisted surgery (RAS) has brought in a change to the perception and roles of theatre staff, as well as the dynamics of the operative environment and team. This study aims to identify and describe current perceptions of theatre staff in the context of RAS. 12 semi-structured interviews were conducted in a tertiary level university hospital, where RAS is utilised in selected elective settings. Interviews were conducted by an experienced research nurse to staff of the colorectal department operating theatre (nursing, surgical and anaesthetics) with some experience in operating within open, laparoscopic and RAS surgical settings. Thematic analysis on all interviews was performed, with formation of preliminary themes. Respondents all discussed advantages of all modes of operating. All respondents appreciated the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, in the reduced physiological insult to patients. However, interviewees remarked on the current perceived limitations of RAS in terms of logistics. Some voiced apprehension and anxieties about the safety if an operation needs to be converted to open. An overarching theme with participants of all levels and backgrounds was the 'Teamwork' and the concept of the [robotic] team. The physical differences of RAS changes the traditional methods of communication, with the loss of face-to-face contact and the physical 'separation' of the surgeon from the rest of the operating team impacting theatre dynamics. It is vital to understand the staff cultures, concerns and perception to the use of this relatively new technology in colorectal surgery.

Psychosocial readiness assessment for heart transplant candidates

BackgroundPsychosocial evaluation for transplant suitability is required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a condition of participation for transplant programs. There are no regulations regarding follow-up reassessment for transplant readiness after waitlisting. ObjectivesAn evidence-based pilot project was developed and implemented to evaluate the feasibility of psychosocial readiness assessments for waitlisted heart transplantation candidates. The primary aim was to test the feasibility of these assessments in practice from a patient and programmatic perspective. MethodsDuring a 12-week period, waitlisted outpatients underwent one assessment each. Socioeconomic elements of caregiver support, housing, transportation, and insurance coverage status were assessed by simple using “yes/no” questions. To assess mental health needs, the General Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire (GAD-7) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) tools were utilized. Rescheduled readiness visits and no-show rates were measured. A post-implementation Qualtrics survey was administered to measure team member perceptions of feasibility. ResultsA total of 57 patients were assessed during the 12-week period. The primary aim of feasibility was achieved with 93 % of visits performed with freedom from rescheduling or patient no-show to the visit. Additionally, 75 % of team members reported the readiness assessments were feasible to complete in practice. ConclusionsAddressing the non-medical and mental health needs of waitlisted heart transplant patients allows transplant programs to maintain candidates with necessary resources and care. The readiness assessments are feasible in practice and may serve to reduce untoward outcomes in the post-transplant phase by providing targeted care prior to the time of transplant.

Enhancing Team Performance in Surgical Operations: A Case Study at a Private Cancer Hospital and Research Centre in Thrissur District

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the existing team dynamics within the surgical crew; to gain insights into the perceptions of different team members regarding team effectiveness and potential areas for improvement; to investigate factors crucial to successful teamwork in the operation theatre, and to analyze successful practices that have positively impacted team performance and patient outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative data was gathered through a validated questionnaire distributed among surgical team members at a private cancer hospital and research center in Thrissur District, Kerala. Descriptive research was adapted for this study. The population for the study includes the members of the surgical team. A sample size of 120 members including doctors, nurses, technicians, and other supportive members who participated in various surgeries, were selected using a random sampling technique for the data purpose. Findings: The findings of the study disclosed that the challenges included occasional communication breakdowns and role ambiguity that seriously influenced the team performance of a surgical crew. Successful practices involved structured communication protocols, regular team training, and a collaborative leadership approach. Stakeholders accentuated the need for continuous improvement in strategies premeditated to the operation theatre’s unique demands. Research limitations/implications: The study’s inferences underscore the necessity for targeted intermediations focusing on the factors manipulating the surgical teams. Implementing structured training programs, refining communication protocols, and fostering a collaborative leadership culture can notably improve team performance. Additionally, modifying these interventions to suit the specific demands of the operation theatre is essential for sustaining and augmenting positive changes in teamwork dynamics, ultimately elevating the quality of patient care and outcomes. Social Implications: The empirical research contributed to enhancing the quality of surgical care, improving patient safety, and refining the overall performance of surgical teams in specialized healthcare settings through enhanced team performance for societal well-being by improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare disparities. A more cohesive surgical team fosters a safer environment, positively impacting patient satisfaction, trust in healthcare, and overall community health. Additionally, it promotes a culture of collaboration and excellence, setting a precedent for improved healthcare practices within society. Originality / Value: The originality of the study lies in its broad examination of team dynamics within a specialized setting, the operation theatre of a private cancer hospital, and a research center. The study offers insights into specific challenges, successful practices, and context-specific interventions, to enhance team performance and patient care in this distinct healthcare environment.

Abstract WP111: Stroke Team Member Perspectives on Factors That Influence Hospital Door-to-Needle Time Performance: A Qualitative Analysis

Background: Despite substantial to minimize ischemic stroke treatment delays, hospital door-to-needle (DTN) time variations persist. We sought to identify sources of variation in practice as well as understand stroke team member perceptions of factors that influence DTN performance in a sample of hospitals that participate in a statewide stroke registry. Methods: We conducted a series of semi-structured interviews with stroke coordinators and emergency department (ED) staff. Participants were invited from hospitals with the fastest or slowest DTN times in 2022. Transcripts of the interviews were coded to identify differences in hospital acute stroke code processes as well as interviewee perceptions of facilitators and barriers to optimal performance. Results: Ten individuals from 6 hospitals participated in interviews (6 stroke coordinators, 3 ED physicians, 1 ED nurse). Variations in stroke code processes included location of initial patient evaluation, stroke team composition (inclusion of pharmacy or in-person neurology provider), imaging strategy for large-vessel occlusion stroke screening, thrombolytic medication utilized, and team members primarily responsible for thrombolytic decision-making, mixing, and delivery. Common facilitators of rapid DTN times included integration of EMS, multidisciplinary engagement with quality improvement teams (especially physician engagement), embedding critical care nurses in stroke teams, and providing rapid, individualized feedback to clinical personnel. Common barriers included identifying stroke in triage, staff turnover, and inadequate stroke coordinator resources. Participants from higher performing hospitals reported having larger stroke teams with in-person neurology support. Participants from lower performing hospitals highlighted staffing shortages and difficulties with video-based teleneurology. Conclusion: Stroke code process variation is common and largely driven by hospital resources. Highly engaged, physician-led multidisciplinary teams and timely, actionable feedback were seen as key elements of achieving DTN goals. Staffing shortages and lack of access to timely neurological consultation are system-level barriers to optimal stroke care.

Impact of the Multidisciplinary Cancer Team on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Care Pathway of Early Breast Cancer Patients and Perception of Team Members: The Experience of a Cancer Centre in Italy

Literature on the role of multidisciplinary team (MDT) in cancer is still controversial. We aimed to investigate MDT impact on a panel of indicators in breast cancer care in a single-center retrospective study performed in a Cancer Reference Center in Italy. We analysed the diagnostic and therapeutic care pathway (DTCP) of 266 early breast cancer patients managed by our MDT during 2019-2020. Process indicators reflecting the change of the diagnostic and therapeutic care pathways occurred after the MDT discussion were computed. Further, the performance of some quality care indicators in breast cancer care since the establishment of the MDT activity and the breast cancer MDT members’ perceptions were also investigated. According to our study, the MDT approach improves breast cancer management by increasing the completion of staging and by encouraging neo-adjuvant treatment and an appropriate and faster surgery. In MDT members’ perspective it also improves decision-making and training and creates a positive work environment. Globally, our study encourages MDT rollout in breast cancer care. However, to enhance the reliability and comparability of the results of studies investigating MDT effectiveness in clinical practice, shared guidelines on its operationalisation are strongly desirable.

Comfort and Coordination among Interprofessional Care Providers Involved in Intubations in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Successful execution of invasive procedures in acute care settings, including tracheal intubation, requires careful coordination of an interprofessional team. The stress inherent to the intensive care unit (ICU) environment may threaten the optimal communication and planning necessary for the safe execution of this complex procedure. The objective of this study is to characterize the perceptions of interprofessional team members surrounding tracheal intubations in the pediatric ICU (PICU). This is a single-center survey-based study of staff involved in the intubation of pediatric patients admitted to a tertiary level academic PICU. Physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists (RT) involved in tracheal intubations were queried via standardized, discipline-specific electronic surveys regarding their involvement in procedural planning and overall awareness of and comfort with the intubation plan. Qualitative variables were assessed by both Likert scales and free-text comments that were grouped and analyzed thematically. One hundred and eleven intubation encounters were included during the study time period, of which 93 (84%) had survey responses from at least 2 professional teams. Among those included in the analysis, the survey was completed 244 times by members of the PICU teams including 86 responses from physicians, 76 from nurses, and 82 from RTs. Survey response rates were >80% from each provider team. There were significant differences in interprofessional team comfort with nurses feeling less well informed and comfortable with the intubation plan and process compared to physicians and RTs (p < 0.001 for both). Qualitative themes including clear communication, adequate planning and preparation prior to procedure initiation, and clear definition of roles emerged among both affirmative and constructive comments. Exploration of provider perceptions and emergence of constructive themes expose opportunities for teamwork improvement strategies involving intubations in the PICU. The use of a preintubation checklist may improve organization and communication amongst team members, increase provider morale, decrease team stress levels, and, ultimately, may improve patient outcomes during this high stakes, coordinated event.

Leadership Styles and Their Influence on Project Team Performance

In today's dynamic and competitive business environment, effective leadership stands as a cornerstone for successful project outcomes. This research delves into the multifaceted relationship between leadership styles and project team performance, exploring the intricate interplay between various leadership approaches and team dynamics. Utilizing a mixed-methods research design, this study comprehensively investigates the impact of leadership styles – including transformational, transactional, laissez-faire, democratic, and autocratic – on project teams across diverse industries. The quantitative phase involves structured surveys administered to project team members and leaders, aiming to quantify the prevalence of different leadership styles within various organizational contexts. Simultaneously, the qualitative phase employs in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, capturing the nuanced experiences and perceptions of team members and leaders regarding the influence of leadership styles on motivation, collaboration, and overall project success. Through rigorous analysis, this research reveals intriguing patterns and correlations between specific leadership styles and project team performance metrics such as quality, timeliness, and efficiency. Moreover, it sheds light on the underlying mechanisms through which leadership impacts team dynamics, uncovering the pivotal role of communication, empowerment, and adaptability in shaping collaborative efforts. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of contextual factors, including project complexity and organizational culture, as crucial influencers of the leadership-team performance nexus. By understanding these contextual nuances, organizations can tailor their leadership strategies to optimize team synergy and enhance project outcomes. The findings presented herein not only contribute to academic discourse in the fields of leadership and project management but also offer practical insights for project managers and organizational leaders. By aligning leadership styles with the unique demands of their projects, businesses can foster a culture of innovation, resilience, and high performance, ultimately achieving sustainable success in today’s competitive landscape.

Fuzzy-Based Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Applied to Cyber-Power Grids

Failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) is a qualitative risk analysis method widely used in various industrial and service applications. Despite its popularity, the method suffers from several shortcomings analyzed in the literature over the years. The classical approach to obtain the failure modes’ risk level does not consider any relative importance between the risk factors and may not necessarily represent the real risk perception of the FMECA team members, usually expressed by natural language. This paper introduces the application of Type-I fuzzy inference systems (FIS) as an alternative to improve the failure modes’ risk level computation in the classic FMECA analysis and its use in cyber-power grids. Our fuzzy-based FMECA considers first a set of fuzzy variables defined by FMECA experts to embody the uncertainty associated with the human language. Second, the “seven plus or minus two” criterion is used to set the number of fuzzy sets to each variable, forming a rule base consisting of 125 fuzzy rules to represent the risk perception of the experts. In the electrical power systems framework, the new fuzzy-based FMECA is utilized for reliability analysis of cyber-power grid systems, assessing its benefits relative to a classic FMECA. The paper provides the following three key contributions: (1) representing the uncertainty associated with the FMECA experts using fuzzy sets, (2) representing the FMECA experts’ reasoning and risk perception through fuzzy-rule-based reasoning, and (3) applying the proposed fuzzy approach, which is a promissory method to accurately define the prioritization of failure modes in the context of reliability analysis of cyber-power grid systems.

IMPACT OF IMPLEMENTING A SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLIST IN HOSPITAL: LITERATURE REVIEW

ABSTRACT Background: The Surgical Safety Checklist is part of WHO's efforts to reduce the number of deaths worldwide. Purpose: To analyze the impact of implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in hospitals. Methods: Article search was carried out through PubMed and ScienceDirect databases using keywords ("impact") OR ("effect") AND ("implementation") AND ("surgical safety checklist") AND ("hospital") . The total number of articles found was 195, but only six articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: A comprehensive study in 7 hospitals located in 4 countries found the impact of implementing the Surgical Safety Checklist in hospitals could improve the quality of care, reduce the length of hospitalization, reduce mortality and complications that cause morbidity, reduce treatment costs, improve surgical team communication, increase trust in the safety culture in the operating room, improve teamwork climate, safety climate, surgical outcomes, and improve patient safety. Conclusion: Surgical Safety Checklist can reduce mortality and morbidity, improve quality of care, reduce treatment costs, and affect the attitudes &amp; perceptions of team members and patient safety.

A qualitative interview study exploring the psychological health impacts of the SPIN-CHAT program among people with systemic sclerosis at the onset of COVID-19: perceptions of trial participants and research team members

Purpose Explore trial participants’ and research team members’ perceptions of the impact of the videoconference-based, supportive care program (SPIN-CHAT Program) during early COVID-19 for individuals with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods Data were collected cross-sectionally. A social constructivist paradigm was adopted, and one-on-one videoconference-based, semi-structured interviews were conducted with SPIN-CHAT Trial participants and research team members. A hybrid inductive-deductive approach and reflexive thematic analysis were used. Results Of the 40 SPIN-CHAT Trial participants and 28 research team members approached, 30 trial participants (Mean age = 54.9; SD = 13.0 years) and 22 research team members agreed to participate. Those who took part in interviews had similar characteristics to those who declined. Five themes were identified: (1) The SPIN-CHAT Program conferred a range of positive psychological health outcomes, (2) People who don’t have SSc don’t get it: The importance of SSc-specific programming, (3) The group-based format of the SPIN-CHAT Program created a safe space to connect and meet similar others, (4) The structure and schedule of the SPIN-CHAT Program reduced feelings of boredom and contributed to enhanced psychological health, (5) The necessity of knowledge, skills, and tools to self-manage SSc and navigate COVID-19. Conclusion Participants’ and research team members’ perspectives elucidated SPIN-CHAT Program benefits and how these benefits may have been realized. Results underscore the importance of social support from similar others, structure, and self-management to enhance psychological health during COVID-19. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04335279) IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION The videoconference-based, supportive care SPIN-CHAT Program enhanced psychological health amongst individuals affected by systemic sclerosis. SPIN-CHAT Program participants and research team members shared that being around similar others, program structure, and self-management support were important and may have contributed to enhanced psychological health. Further efforts are required to explore experiences within supportive care programs to better understand if and how psychological health is impacted.

Delegation of Work Within a Patient-Centered Medical Home.

The aim of this study was to analyze the perceptions of core team members implementing patient-centered medical home (PCMH) within the Veterans Health Administration regarding delegation of work. Significant overlap exists in the performance of work tasks among PCMH team members (primary care providers, RNs, clinical associates, clerks), and scant literature exists on appropriate delegation within PCMH teams. This study conducted used a quantitative and qualitative analysis of 4254 respondents to a 2018 survey. Primary care providers rely heavily on team members, and nurses report being relied upon at high levels. Lack of role clarity and a perceived need for a team leader were concerns voiced by participants. Findings indicated a need for clear guidance on roles and responsibilities within the team. Patient-centered medical home team members need information about the scope of practice of each professional group to allow providers to function at the top of their scope of practice and ensure effective delegation.

Abstract 9446: Psychosocial Readiness Assessment for Heart Transplant Candidates

Background: Psychosocial evaluation for heart transplant suitability has long been required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as a condition of participation for transplant programs in the US. There is no regulation regarding follow-up psychosocial care and re-assessment of patients waitlisted for transplantation. Heart transplant candidates require a thorough initial evaluation of multiple psychosocial factors and are at risk of negative outcomes with mental health problems and/or unstable socioeconomic resources. Purpose: A descriptive surveillance quality improvement project was developed to evaluate the effects of psychosocial readiness assessments for waitlisted United Network for Organ Sharing status 3, 4, and 5 adult heart transplant candidates in the outpatient setting, addressing basic socioeconomic needs and mental wellness in preparation for transplantation. Methods: To determine acceptability, rescheduled readiness visits and no-show rates were measured. A post-implementation period Qualtrics RM survey was administered to measure team member perceptions of feasibility. Socioeconomic elements of caregiver support, housing, transportation, and insurance status were assessed by simple using “yes/no” questions. The General Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 were used to assess anxiety and depression, respectively. Results: Fifty-seven patients were assessed during the 12-week period. The primary aim of feasibility was achieved with 93% of visits performed with freedom from rescheduling or patient no-show. Seventy five percent of team members reported the readiness assessments were achievable. More than twenty-four percent (24.56%) of patients required follow-up from a transplant Social Worker with 94.74% of those referrals due solely to elevated mental health questionnaire scores. Conclusion: Addressing non-medical and mental health needs in waitlisted heart transplant patients allows transplant programs to maintain candidates with necessary resources. The readiness assessments are feasible in practice and may serve to reduce untoward outcomes in the post-transplant phase by providing targeted care prior to the time of transplant.

The pragmatic side of workplace heroics: a ­self-interest perspective on responding to mistreatment in work teams

Research on third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment has often focused on a moral perspective, but has devoted limited attention to the role of self-interest. Drawing from a self-interest perspective, we develop a conceptual model that examines how self-interest influences third-party responses to mistreatment within work teams. Several important relational (justice reputation, social status, relationship with the target, power) and situational (number of observers, mistreatment intensity) factors are posited to influence third-party perceptions of team members’ expectations for their intervention, and perceptions of the expected salience of their response to their team members. These perceived expectations for intervention are theorized to positively influence the expected salience of their response, which is strengthened under conditions of ethical leadership, ethical climate, and ethical HRM practices. In turn, third parties use a cost-benefit analysis to decide how to respond in a manner that serves their interests, which is moderated by several key factors (probability that intervention alleviates the mistreatment, perceived risk of intervention, third-party vulnerability). We advance a novel process-based conceptual model that provides an alternative lens as to why third parties may intervene during mistreatment within work teams.

Factors influencing patient safety culture in operating room in a teaching hospital in Jordan: a qualitative descriptive study

PurposeTo explore the perceptions of surgical team members in a tertiary hospital in Jordan toward the factors influencing patient safety culture (PSC).Design/methodology/approachThis was a qualitative descriptive study intended to characterize the factors that influence PSC. Interviews were conducted with health-care providers in the operation room (OR) in a tertiary Jordanian hospital. Participants included surgeons, anesthetists, nurses and senior surgical residents who had worked for three years minimum in the OR. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.FindingsA total of 33 interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis of the content yielded four major themes: (1) operational factors, (2) organizational factors, (3) health-care professionals factors and (4) patient factors. The respondents emphasized the role of the physical layout of the OR, implementing new techniques and new equipment, and management support to establish a safety culture in the operating room setting.Originality/valueThe present research study will have implications for hospitals and health-care providers in Jordan for developing organizational strategies to eliminate or decrease the occurrence of adverse events and improve patient safety in the OR.

Challenger But Not Follower? The Chain Effect of Leaders’ Perceived Team Overqualification

Despite the prevalence of employee overqualification in the workplace, most extant research has focused on the incumbent’s perceptions and the effect of these perceptions on themselves or peers, paying little attention to leaders’ perceptions of team members’ overqualification and then their psychological and behavioral reactions. The present study serves to fill in this gap based on 73 leaders and 286 employees from a steel company corporate in southern China. Drawing on social cognitive theory, the study found that leader perceived team overqualification was negatively related to leadership efficacy, and the reduced leadership efficacy would then hinder team performance via limiting leader empowering behavior. In addition, leader social face consciousness strengthened the negative effect of leader perceived team overqualification on leadership efficacy, which in turn, strengthened the indirect negative effect of leader perceived team overqualification on team performance through leadership efficacy and leader empowering behavior. The study contributes to the overqualification literature by considering the perspective of leaders, which allows us to reveal how leaders would respond to overqualified employees.

Configurational Research in Teams

Teams are complex systems in which multiple individual members, themselves containing multiple characteristics, are embedded (Arrow, McGrath, & Berdahl, 2000). Team research has historically been dominated by a focus on what is shared across these multiple components, such as aggregations of team member characteristics or perceptions of team processes operationalized through calculating agreement statistics and means. Instead, configurational perspectives on teams and their members recognize the complexity of teams by focusing on the uneven and disproportional effects of member characteristics or processes on team outcomes (Kozlowski & Klein, 2000). Understanding such effects is essential for building upon traditional approaches using shared team constructs to create new knowledge about how teams create synergy amid seemingly limitless potential for chaos and conflict. Moreover, adopting configurational perspectives on teams is increasingly tractable with advances in configurational methodologies (e.g., social networks, faultlines, latent profile analysis, qualitative comparative analysis, and attribute alignment). As such, this panel symposium will 1) generate awareness of configurational perspectives and methods used in team research, 2) share recent advances in the field, and 3) create an opportunity for researchers who are actively working in or interested in this area to collaborate. The format will include an introduction to the topic, brief presentations from the panelists, and an informal Q&A session involving the panelists, their collaborators, and the audience.