Percentage Of Institutional Ownership Research Articles

The Effect of Non Performing Loan, Agency Cost, Good Corporate Governance, and Credit Policy to Bank Profitability

The study attempts to investigate the effect of Agency Cost (AGCOST), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Loan Deposit Ratio (LDR), Non Performing Loan (NPL), interest rate (BI7DAY) and foreign exchange rate (KURS) to bank profitability measured by Return on Assets (ROA). The sample consists of 29 banks listed in Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) during 2012 – 2021. Sampling method was census. Data analysis method was panel data regression method. The novelty of the research is using the ratio of board of director’s and commissioner’s remuneration to total salary as the proxy of AGCOST. GCG was proxied by percentage of institutional ownership. Result shows that NPL, AGCOST and GCG have a significant negative effect to ROA; CAR and BI7DAY have a significant positive effect to ROA; LDR and KURS have a insignificant effect to ROA. Conclusion of the study: escalating the board’s remuneration and institutional ownership will decrease ROA.

Why does price deviate from net asset value? The case of Singaporean infrastructure REITs

This paper examines the determinants of the changes in premiums to Net Asset Value (NAV) in infrastructure REIT (infra-REIT) share prices in Singapore over the 2017–2021 period. Samples of 11 listed Singaporean REITs (S-REITs) are selected to create a balanced panel data for the analysis. Our finding shows that infrastructure S-REITs have generally been trading at premiums to their NAVs. The first part of the analysis shows that REIT premiums are positively related to REIT size (market cap) and percentage of institutional ownership. On the other hand, REIT premiums are negatively related to dividend yield. Volatility, volume, ROE and liquidity are found to be insignificant in explaining price and NAV divergence. The second part of the analysis finds that there is a higher proportion of uninformed (noise) traders when infrastructure S-REIT prices are diverging from their NAV. This finding supports the Noise theory which implies that there is some evidence that noise traders are present in the infrastructure S-REIT market and their actions might cause irrational departure of REIT prices from the underlying NAV.

Analyzing the Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance of Banking Companies

The financial performance of most of the companies in Indonesia are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, especially the banking sector. Thus, this study is intended to analyze the impact of corporate governance on financial performance in banking companies by considering the pandemic factor. This study uses quantitative method with a descriptive causal design. The sample used in this study are forty-six banking companies which are listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange during the period of 2019-2022. Moreover, corporate governance is measured using the number of board of commissioners, board of directors, and percentage of institutional ownership. On the other hand, financial performance is measured by using Return on Equity. A regression analysis was conducted to obtain the statistical results of the data. As a result, institutional ownership positively impacts the financial performance of banking companies. The higher the bank is owned by the institution, the higher the financial performance. On the other hand, the board of commissioners and board of directs have no impact on the financial performance of banking companies. Furthermore, several implications can be drawn from this study.

The Simultaneous Effect Dividend Policy and Debt Policy

This study aims to examine dividend policies for companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2018-2022 period. Agency theory argues that dividend policy can reduce agency costs and reduce agency conflicts. The percentage of institutional ownership is used as a proxy for agency costs and can be used as a mechanism for lowering agency conflict. The total sample is 44 companies listed on the IDX. The estimation uses the pooling data method and 3SLS. This research develops a simultaneous system econometric model. This study argues that high institutional ownership leads to higher agency conflict, as management and institutions collaborate to prioritize their interests over other shareholders. Conversely, low institutional ownership leads to disputes between management, low institutional, and public shareholders. The entrenchment argument predicts higher conflict in high institutional ownership, while the convergence argument predicts common agency conflict in common institutional ownership.

PENGARUH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP GREEN BANKING DISCLOSURE (STUDI PADA PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN DI INDONESIA YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI PERIODE 2018 – 2020)

This research aims to analyze the influence of Corporate Governance on Green Banking Disclosure in bankingcompanies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2018 - 2020. Corporate governance plays acrucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability within companies, as well as supporting their efforts inimplementing sustainable and responsible business practices towards the environment. In this study, CorporateGovernance is measured through three variables: Board of Commissioners, Independent Commissioners, andInstitutional Ownership. The Board of Commissioners is considered as one of the institutions responsible for decisionmakingwithin the company. The number of board members is an important indicator in this research, as a larger boardsize allows for diverse perspectives and expertise to be applied in the decision-making process. Additionally,Independent Commissioners are also a significant factor in maintaining the independence and integrity of thecompany's oversight. In this study, the proportion of Independent Commissioners compared to the total number ofcommissioners is used as a measure of their presence and independence. Institutional Ownership is another variable ofinterest in this research. Institutional ownership reflects the participation and involvement of financial institutions andinstitutional investors in the ownership of company shares. The percentage of institutional ownership in relation to thetotal outstanding shares is measured to gain insights into the extent of financial institutions' role in decision-makingand oversight within the company. Green Banking Disclosure is the main focus of this study. Green Bankingencompasses banking practices that prioritize environmental sustainability. Green Banking Disclosure is measuredusing the Green Banking Disclosure Index (GBDI), which covers various aspects such as environmental riskmanagement, sustainable financing, and other environmental initiatives. To test the relationship between thesevariables, the researcher employs multiple linear regression analysis. The data used in this study consists of 96observations, involving 32 banking companies each year. The data is analyzed using the Statistical Package for SocialSciences (SPSS) software to generate generalizable findings.The results of this study indicate that the Board ofCommissioners has a significant positive influence on Green Banking Disclosure in banking companies listed on theIndonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2018 - 2020. This suggests that a stronger composition and role of theBoard of Commissioners in decision-making lead to higher levels of disclosure of environmentally friendly businesspractices. However, the study did not find a significant relationship between Independent Commissioners and GreenBanking Disclosure, and it found that Institutional Ownership has a significant negative influence on Green BankingDisclosure. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the importance of the role and composition of CorporateGovernance in promoting the disclosure of sustainable business practices in banking companies in Indonesia.Keywords: Board of Commissioners; Independent Commissioners; Institutional Ownership; Green Banking Disclosure

PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN SUB SEKTOR MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN DAN SUB SEKTOR BATUBARA

This study aims to analyze the influence of the board of directors, audit committee, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership on the financial performance of food and beverage sub-sector companies and coal sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2017-2021 period. The board of directors is measured by the number of members of the board of directors in the company. The audit committee is measured by the number of members of the audit committee in the company, institutional ownership is measured by the percentage of institutional ownership in the company, and managerial ownership is measured by the percentage of ownership of managers in the company. The company's performance is proxied by Return on Assets (ROA) with the formula net profit divided by total assets. The method used in this research is purposive sampling. The data is quantitative data based on secondary data in the form of financial statements. The data analysis method used is multiple linear data analysis. The results of hypothesis testing indicate that the board of directors, audit committee, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership have a significant effect on the company's financial performance in food and beverage sub-sector companies and coal sub-sector companies.

Pengaruh Manajemen Laba dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Delay

This study aims to analyze and provide empirical evidence whether the mechanism of corporate governance practices and earnings management has an effect on audit delay. The calculation used in earnings management is discretionary accruals, while the indicators in the governance mechanism are institutional ownership, independent commissioners and audit committees. This study uses the object of research in companies engaged in the tourism, hotel and restaurant sectors listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2020. Research related to the effect of earnings management and corporate governance on audit delays in tourism, hotel and restaurant sector companies is difficult to find so this research was chosen to be carried out, given the importance of timely information (timeliness) and the transition in the tourism sector due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This research is a qualitative research using purposive sampling technique for sample selection. The data that can be processed are 94 samples. Hypothesis testing using multiple linear regression. The results of the study found that earnings management with discretionary accrual methods and institutional ownership had no effect on audit delay. Meanwhile, the independent board of commissioners and the audit committee have a positive effect on audit delay. The conclusion in this study is that the percentage of institutional ownership does not cause delays in submitting the independent auditor's report. Meanwhile, the higher the total number of independent commissioners and audit committee members, it can slow down the audit, causing audit delay.

The effect of institutional ownership on listed companies’ tax avoidance strategies

ABSTRACT The percentage of institutional ownership in China has increased gradually. Does this characteristic of Chinese institutional investors affect their participation in corporate governance, which in turn, affects corporate tax avoidance activities? We take 1108 listed Chinese companies from 2009 to 2017 to study this issue. The paper uses average daily total market capitalization as an instrumental variable to test the endogeneity problems. We run a quantile regression (QR) at the median level as robustness testing to overcome the fat tail of financial data. Then, the shareholding ratio of majority shareholders is introduced to verify that ownership concentration is one of the mechanisms through which institutional shareholders influence corporate tax avoidance decisions. The findings are as follows: The proportion of institutional investors’ shareholdings is positively related to the degree of enterprise tax avoidance. The increase in institutional investors’ shareholdings is likely to promote corporate tax avoidance. When the level of ownership concentration is low, the increase in institutional ownership can play a greater role in promoting tax avoidance.

Board diversity and firm performance in the U.S. tourism sector: The effect of institutional ownership

Abstract This study examines the relationship between board diversity and firm performance in the U.S. tourism sector by using institutional ownership as a contingency that moderates this relationship. The study's sample includes publicly-traded companies from the U.S. restaurant, hotel and airline industries. The hypotheses are tested via two-way fixed-effects regression, and the findings of the study indicate that board diversity is positively associated with financial performance (Tobin's Q), and the effect of board diversity on performance is contingent on the degree of institutional ownership. More precisely, the study finds that board diversity has a larger effect on financial performance when institutional ownership is low on a tourism firm's ownership structure. Overall, the findings suggest that boards' internal control and monitoring on management is important to derive higher financial performance, and even yet it is more important when external monitoring by institutional owners, proxied by percentage of institutional ownership, is weak.

Pengaruh Audit Committee, Ownership Structure, dan Chief Executive Officer terhadap Financial Distress pada Perusahaan Sektor Perdagangan, Jasa, dan Investasi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada Tahun 2015-2018

Financial distress is a condition that occurs before a company goes bankrupt, so before that happens, the company needs to take actions such as good corporate governance practices. The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of the audit committee, ownership structure, and CEO on financial distress in trading, service, and investment companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2018. The analysis technique used is logistic regression analysis. This type of research is quantitative by using a sample of 25 companies determined through a purposive sampling technique. The results showed that the frequency of audit committee meetings had a significant and positive impact on financial distress, and institutional ownership had a significant and negative impact on financial distress. While the other variables include: audit committee size, audit committee competence, audit committee independence, managerial ownership, family ownership, government ownership, foreign ownership, block holder ownership, and CEO's gender do not have a significant impact on financial distress. Implications of the results in this study are considering the frequency of audit committee meetings and the percentage of institutional ownership in predicting financial distress that can be used by companies and potential investors.

Ownership Structure and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Karachi Stock Exchange

Stock price crash risk is one of the most significant risks associated with the firm. Therefore, it is important to consider the factors which may influence the price crash risk. Various factors of corporate governance found to have an impact on the stock price crash risk. The ownership structure of the firm is a critical attribute of corporate governance. This study's objective is to determine the impact of two types of ownership of a company (managerial ownership and institutional ownership) on its stock price crash risk. To examine whether a firm's ownership structures have an association with stock price crash risk, the multiple linear regression model applied on the panel data of 190 companies listed on KSE for the year 2009-2018. The results of this study show that there is a significantly positive relationship between the institutional ownership and stock price crash risk. However, no association found between managerial ownership and price crash risk. These results imply that the percentage of institutional ownership should be reduced in the firm's ownership structure to reduce the firm's stock price crash risk.

PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of good corporate governance on corporate financial performance. Good corporate governance in this study is proxied by percentage of institutional ownership, composition of board of directors and composition of independent commissioner. The financial performance of a banking company is measured by Return on Equity (ROE). The population of this study are banking companies Book II and III listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), amounting to 29 companies. The technique of the sample using purposive sampling obtained 19 companies. The type of data used is secondary data. Data analysis technique in this research use multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study partially indicate that the percentage of institutional ownership, composition of board of directors and composition of independent commissioner has no significant effect with the direction of negative coefficient on ROE. While the simultaneous percentage of institutional ownership, the composition of the board of directors and the composition of independent commissioners composition have significant effect on ROE with positive coefficient direction.

PENGARUH KINERJA KEUANGAN TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN DENGAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

This study will examine how the instruments of good corporate governance can moderate the impact of thefanancial performance of the company. Financial performance proxied by ROA, ROE and Leverage, while the value of the company with the Tobins Q. Good corporate governance is measured by the percentage ofinstitutional ownership. Hypothesis testing is done by multiple regression method with the classical assumption test first. The total population sample of 129 companies from manufacturing companies listed on the Stock Exchange. The results of this study is good corporate governance as a system that can regulate the division of duties, rights and obligations of parties interested in the life of the company, including shareholders, board members, and managers can improve company performance impact on company value.

The effect of institutional ownership on firm performance: the case of U.S.-listed shipping companies

ABSTRACTThis paper examines the relationship between institutional ownership and firm performance for U.S.-listed shipping companies using quarterly 13F reports of institutional holdings over the period 2002 to 2016. Traditionally, public shipping companies exhibit a large concentration of ownership as specific individuals and families hold large percentages of the total shares outstanding. However, institutional investors also hold a substantial percentage of ownership of U.S.-listed shipping firms, whose effects on firm performance have not been examined previously in the literature. Results reveal a negative relationship between the percentage of institutional ownership and firm performance, which is primarily attributed to non-strategic rather than strategic institutional investors. This result survives a set of panel data estimators which take into account the presence of dynamic endogeneity in the relationship examined.

The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Firm Performance: The Case of U.S. Listed Shipping Companies

This paper examines the relationship between institutional ownership and firm performance for US listed shipping companies using quarterly 13F reports of institutional holdings over the period 2002 to 2016. Traditionally, public shipping companies exhibit a large concentration of ownership as specific individuals and families hold large percentages of the total shares outstanding. However, institutional investors also hold a substantial percentage of ownership of U.S. listed shipping firms, whose effects on firm performance have not been examined previously in the literature. Results reveal a negative relationship between the percentage of institutional ownership and firm performance, which is primarily attributed to non-strategic rather than strategic institutional investors. This result survives a set of panel data estimators which take into account the presence of dynamic endogeneity in the relationship examined.

Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan pada Industri Telekomunikasi di Bursa Efek Indonesia

Investor as a principal want to maximize whealth and prosperity by increasing firm value. Firm value for companies listed as issuer in Indonesia Stock Exchange can be reflected through share price. Firm value can be affected by several factors, such as financial performance and corporate governance. This research aimed to examine the influence of financial performance and corporate governance to firm value in sub-sector telecomunication industry which listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2011 to 2016. The dependent variable is firm value. Meanwhile the independent variables are (1) financial performance which measured by current ratio, receivable turnover, debt to equity ratio, return on assets, and earnings per share and (2) corporate governance which measured by percentage of institutional ownership, percentage of independent board of commissioners, and presence of the audit committee. The result showed that current ratio, receivable turnover, debt to equity ratio, earning per share, and presence of the audit committee partially had no significant influence to firm value. Meanwhile return on assets, percentage of institutional ownership, and percentage of independent board of commissioners partially had significant influence to firm value. Simultaneously current ratio, receivable turnover, debt to equity ratio, return on assets, earnings per share, percentage of institutional ownership, percentage of independent board of commissioners, and presence of the audit committee had significant influence to fim value. Keywords:Financial Performance, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value

Institutional ownership, product market competition, and earnings management: Some evidence from international data

We examine the impact of institutional ownership and product market competition on earnings management (both accrual-based and real) using data from non-financial firms in 41 countries around the world for the period 1995–2016. Overall all, we document an asymmetry in the role institutional ownership and product market competition play in curbing accrual vis-à-vis real earnings management. After controlling for firm-level determinants of earnings management documented by prior research, industry and country indicator variables, we find robust evidence (no evidence) that accrual (real) earnings management increases (is associated) with percentage of institutional ownership. While institutional ownership appears to have no effect on real earnings management, it significantly accentuates accrual earnings management. We also find that product market competition is positively associated with accrual earnings management, though statistically significantly only when the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) proxy is used. Lastly, product market competition is significantly negatively associated with real earnings management, using two of the three proxies of product market competition. Only when we use the inverse of number of firms in an industry (NUMB) do we find a positive association between product market competition and real earnings management. Product market competition appears to accentuate accrual but attenuate real earnings management.

PENGARUH FINANCIAL DISTRESS, REAL EARNINGS MANAGEMENT DAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP TAX AGGRESSIVENESS

This study is aimed to examine the effect of financial distress, real earnings management, and corporate governanceon tax aggressiveness. Using samples from manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2011 to 2015, the data will be examined with fixed effect approach method. The results of this study indicate that financial distress does not affect on tax aggressiveness. While from real earnings management variables, only through manipulation of sales as which affects positive significantly on tax aggressiveness. On the contrary, manipulation of the production and manipulation of discretionary expenses precisely give the opposite effect. In addition, corporate governance consists of the audit committee and the percentage of institutional ownership can reduce tax aggressiveness, meanwhile the third measure (the percentage of independent commissioners) shows the opposite result..

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON CAPITAL STRUCTURE, OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM INDIA

The study has attempted to empirically examine the effect of capital structure and ownership structure on the accounting performance of Indian manufacturing firms listed and traded on Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) of India during the period of 2009-16. The capital structure is represented by the debt to equity ratio whereas the various forms of ownership structure are represented by percentage of domestic promoters’ ownership, percentage of foreign promoters’ ownership and percentage of institutional ownership. Besides, return on assets and return on net worth are introduced to measure firms’ accounting performance. The study is based on panel data analysis. We have introduced Fixed Effect Model for the regression on such panel data. We estimated Restricted F test, Lagrange Multiplier Test and Hausman Test for the purpose of final selection of appropriate model for our regression analysis. Finally, the study found a significantly negative effect of capital structure on accounting performance of our sampled firms. However, the study found a significant and positive impact of almost all forms of ownership structure on firms’ accounting performance. Thus, the study proposed the firms’ accounting performance as the function of almost all the variables of capital and ownership structure used in the study.

The Effect of Capital Structure, Shareholders and Major of the Company on the Conservative Practices in Companies

Conservatism, an important feature in most high-quality reporting and most corporate may be used from it to achieve the quality of their reports. In this study, the effect of capital structure, ownership and firm size using data on conservative 50 companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange and multivariate regression with panel data are analyzed. The research presented in this paper is two models of Biur and Rayan (2000) and Hayen Giuly model (2000) was used to measure conservatism. The results showed that the relationship between ownership concentration, percentage of institutional ownership, firm size, leverage, and conservative accounting conservatism varies by model. The similar first and two models, a significant relationship between conservatism capital structure and financial leverage as a representative there was no relationship between ownership concentration and conservatism protection. In the first model, not observed the relationship between the percentage of institutional ownership and conservatism, but in the second model was observed counter and significant relationship. In the second model, the relationship between firm size and conservatism, but no significant relationship was observed in the first model.