Percentage Of Excess BMI Loss Research Articles

Gastric bypass surgery in morbid obesity: Influence on thyroid function tests and insulin resistance status.

There are inconsistent results about the effect of gastric bypass surgery on thyroid function tests in morbidly obese subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in thyroid function tests and insulin resistance status in euthyroid morbidly obese subjects before and three months after gastric bypass surgery (GBS). Twenty-nine subjects with morbid obesity (BMI≥40) were enrolled in this before-after study. Patients with known thyroid disorders or a history of thyroid ablative therapy, users of drugs that affect thyroid function, or fasting blood sugar and insulin were excluded. TSH, Free T4, total T3, fasting blood sugar and insulin level, and BMI were measured before and 3 months after GBS. Statistical analysis was performed with appropriate tests and p<0.05 was considered significant. Body mass index (BMI), insulin sensitivity index (HOMA-IR), and total T3 significantly decreased after bypass surgery (all with p<0.001) but no significant changes were seen in TSH (P=0.203) and FreeT4 (P=0.33). There was a significant negative correlation between changes in HOMA-IR and changes in FreeT4 (P=0.038, r= -0.38). There was no statistically significant correlation between the percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) and changes in T3 (P=0.66), Free T4 (P=0.92), TSH (P= 0.27), and HOMA-IR (P=0.17). Although significant changes can occur in BMI, insulin sensitivity index, fasting blood sugar, and T3 in short-time follow-up after bariatric surgery, significant TSH and FreeT4 changes may need longer follow-ups.

Sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of adolescent obesity in children aged 13 and under: a retrospective study

BackgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) induces weight reduction and improves metabolic co-morbidities in children with severe obesity but remains underutilized, especially for young adolescents and preadolescents. ObjectiveWe hypothesized there would be no differences in weight loss or co-morbidity resolution at 1 year post-SG in children who underwent SG at 13 years or younger compared to children who underwent SG at 17–18 years old. SettingAcademic medical center, United States. MethodsMedical records of children who underwent laparoscopic SG at a quaternary academic center from September 2014 to October 2022 were reviewed. A cohort of 15 patients, ≤13 years of age, was compared to a matched cohort of 15 older adolescent patients. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were collected. ResultsBoth cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. Median preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 51.8 kg/m2 for the ≤13 cohort compared to 50.9 kg/m2 in the older cohort (P = .87). Time to postoperative enteral feeds and length of stay were similar between both groups, and there were no 30-day readmissions or immediate postoperative complications. Median percentage excess BMI loss at 1 year postoperation was 54% (IQR, 25.5%–94.5%) for the ≤13 cohort compared with 44% (IQR, 34.0%–51.0%) for the older cohort (P = .34). Two of 11 patients were lost to follow-up in the younger group compared to 4 of 15 in the older group (P = .61). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in metabolic syndrome co-morbidities after SG. ConclusionSG in younger children is associated with successful postsurgical outcomes compared with adolescents, with effective weight loss and improvement of obesity-related metabolic co-morbidities.

Effect of Primary Versus Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Fatty Acid Profile

IntroductionOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is one option of a revisional procedure for failed sleeve gastrectomy. Moreover, it can be used as a primary bariatric procedure, and is an effective surgery resulting in significant weight loss and the resolution or improvement of obesity-associated medical problems, accompanied by low perioperative complications. However, as with any therapy, OAGB has its limitations, including micronutrient deficiency or malnutrition. In our study, we compared the fatty acid (FA) profile in serum of patients after both primary OAGB (pOAGB) and revisional OAGB (rOAGB) to identify potential postsurgical FA alterations.MethodsThis is a retrospective study on patients with obesity who underwent OAGB procedures (pOAGB n=68; rOAGB n=17), conducted from 2016 to 2018. In blood, we analyzed a series of biochemical parameters, and in the serum, the FA profile was determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.ResultsThe percentage of excess BMI loss (% EBMIL) after pOAGB was 73.5 ± 2.47% in comparison to 45.9 ± 4.15% in the rOAGB group (p<0.001). In contrast to the lack of effect of rOAGB on most polyunsaturated FAs, in the pOAGB group, there was a decrease in eicosapentaenoic acid, and eicosatetraenoic and docosahexaenoic acid levels (p<0.001). We also found a decrease in very long-chain FAs (VLCFAs) and an increase in branched-chain FAs (BCFAs) after both types of OAGB procedure.ConclusionsBoth OAGB procedures improved the profile of most FAs, leading to a decrease in VLCFAs, which are considered harmful, and an improvement in BCFAs, which are considered to be beneficial. There is a need to further investigate the possibility of n-3 polyunsaturated FA supplementation after pOAGB, due to the large decrease in these FAs after pOAGB.Graphical

Impact of Preoperative Psychiatric Profile in Bariatric Surgery on Long-term Weight Outcome

BackgroundConflicting results have been reported regarding the predictive value of preoperative psychological assessment and weight outcome after bariatric surgery. This might be attributed to different factors affecting early weight loss and long-term weight loss. Herein, we investigated whether preoperative psychiatric profile was associated with preoperative BMI and with both early (1 year) and long-term (5 years) weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).MethodsProspective observational cohort study of patients undergoing RYGB between 2013 and 2019. Symptoms related to anxiety, depression, eating disorder, and alcohol use disorders were assessed by employing validated, specific psychometric tests (STAI-S/T, BDI-II, BITE, AUDIT-C) prior to surgery. Pre-operative BMI, early weight loss (1 year), and long-term weight evolution (up to 5 years) were registered.ResultsTwo hundred thirty six patients (81% women) were included in the present study. Linear longitudinal mixed model showed a significant effect of preoperative high anxiety (STAI-S) on long-term weight outcome, after controlling for gender, age and type 2 diabetes. Patient with high preoperative anxiety score regained weight faster than those experiencing low anxiety (each year percent excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) − 4.02%, ± 1.72, p = 0.021). No other pre-operative psychiatric symptoms have been shown to have an impact on long-term weight loss. In addition, no significant association was found between any of the pre-operative psychiatric variables and pre-operative BMI, or early weight loss (%EBMIL) at 1-year post-RYGB.ConclusionHerein we identified high anxiety score (STAI-S) as a predictor for long-term weight regain. Thus, long-term psychiatric surveillance of these patients and the development of tailored management tools could serve as a means to prevent weight regain.Graphical abstract

Quality of life after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Pre-operative, 1-year and 5-year results.

The negative impact of obesity on the quality of life (QoL) and its association with multiple comorbidities is unquestionable. The primary objective of this study was to compare the QoL of patients before, 1 year and 5 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the resolution of obesity-related comorbidities and weight loss success. We included patients who underwent LSG for body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 between August 2016 and April 2017 and completed the Moorehead-Ardelt QoL Questionnaire II (MA II). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS IBM Statistics for Windows version 21. In total, 64 patients participated with a female majority (73.44%) and a mean age of 36.09 with an average BMI at 40.47. Percentage of excess BMI loss and excess weight loss (% EWL) at one and 5 years after surgery went from 90.18% to 85.05% and 72.17% to 67.09%, respectively. The total MA II score before LSG was - 0.39 ± 0.94. Postoperatively, it increased to 1.73 ± 0.60 at 1 year and 1.95 ± 0.67 at 5 years. The positive impact of LSG on QoL was more significant in patients presenting ≥30% of weight loss and in females. At 5 years, a significant improvement in many comorbidities was noted except for arterial hypertension, coxalgia, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and lower extremities' varices. LSG maintains a long-term QoL improvement, a significant EWL and a resolution of the most common obesity-associated comorbidities such as diabetes, dyslipidaemia and symptoms related to sleep apnoea.

Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundHigh rates of revision surgery have been reported for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), with weight regain (WR) as the most frequently reported cause. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed revision procedure, whereas one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a less popular approach.MethodsA single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted. One hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled and randomized. After loss to follow-up, 80 patients for RYGB and 80 patients for OAGB were analyzed, with a 2-year follow-up. Patients with grade B or higher gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were excluded. Early and late postoperative complications were recorded. Body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL), nutritional laboratory test results, and the resolution of associated medical problems were assessed after revision surgery.ResultsAfter 2 years, both groups achieved significantly lower BMI than their post-LSG nadir BMI (p < 0.001). The %EBMIL changes showed significantly faster weight loss in the OAGB group than in the RYGB at the 6-month follow-up (mean difference: 8.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2 to 16.9%). However, at 1-year and 2-year follow-ups, the differences were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Early and late complications were similar between two groups. Both groups showed improvement or resolution of associated medical problems, with no statistically significant differences after 2 years (p = 1.00).ConclusionBoth revisional RYGB and OAGB have comparable significant weight loss effects when performed for WR after LSG. After a 2-year follow-up, both procedures were safe, with no significant differences in the occurrence of complications and nutritional deficits.Graphical abstract

150-cm Versus 200-cm Biliopancreatic Limb One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

It has been suggested that shortening the length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) to 150cm in one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) would reduce nutritional complication rates without impairing weight loss outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare patients who underwent OAGB with a 200-cm BPL (OAGB-200) to patients with OAGB with a 150-cm BPL (OAGB-150) in terms of weight loss and late morbidity. This is a monocentric retrospective matched cohort study including patients with a body mass index between 35 and 50kg/m2 who underwent an OAGB-150 or an OAGB-200. Patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and body mass index, prior to bariatric surgery. In total, 784 patients who underwent OAGB were included (OAGB-150 n = 392 and OAGB-200 (n = 392). There was no significant difference in terms of early morbidity. Regarding late morbidity in patients with an OAGB-150, significantly lower rates for marginal ulcer (OR = 0.4, CI 95% [0.2; 0.8], p = 0.006), incisional hernia (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.3; 1], p = 0.041), and bowel obstruction (OR = 0.3, CI 95% [0.1; 0.9], p = 0.039) were reported. Likewise, regarding late nutritional deficiencies, post-OAGB-150, a significantly lower number of patients with hypoalbuminemia (OR = 0.3, CI 95% [0.2; 0.7], p = 0.006), low vitamin B9 (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.2; 1], p = 0.044), and low ferritin (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.3; 0.8], p = 0.005) were observed. There was no significant difference in the percentage of excess BMI loss at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5years. Compared to OAGB-200 in patients with BMI ≤ 50kg/m2, OAGB-150 results in fewer nutritional deficiency rates long term, without impairing weight loss.

Association between microstructure of ingestive behavior and body weight loss in patients one year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most effective procedures in the treatment of obesity. However, the predictive value of the microstructure of ingestion has not been widely investigated in this context. Here, we applied a recently developed drinkometer device to analyze the microstructure of ingestive behavior during a liquid meal in women and investigate whether it correlated with measures of weight loss after RYGB.Macro- and microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior of female patients (n = 24) one year after RYGB were measured in two different test sessions within a period of two weeks using the drinkometer. A Pearson correlation analysis was performed to compare the macro- and microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior with the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), percentage excess BMI loss (%EBMIL), and body mass index (BMI) one year after RYGB, as well as age. A Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.003 was considered significant for the correlation analysis. For all other statistical tests, a p < 0.05 was considered significant.One year after surgery, a significant body weight loss was achieved in our study population (111.2 ± 15.6 kg vs 73.4 ± 11.7 kg; ***p < 0.001), with a mean%TWL of 33.8% (range: 20.4–48.6%). At the first test session,%TWL correlated with suck duration (r = 0.41, 0.05 > p > 0.003);%EBMIL correlated with both suck duration (r = 0.64, *p < 0.003) and inter-suck intervals (ISIs, r = –0.47, *p < 0.003), and, finally, BMI correlated with suck duration (r = 0.62, *p < 0.003) and ISIs (r = 0.48, *p < 0.003). However, at the second test session, no correlation was found between the body weight loss and the recorded ingestive parameters. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found in microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior between the two test sessions even though meal size decreased by 20% on the second visit (342.6.6 ± 167 kcal vs. 271.8 ± 142.8 kcal).A greater body weight loss of patients one year after surgery seems to be associated with longer suck duration and shorter ISIs, but only when the stimulus is tested for the first time by the study participants. This study contributes to the current knowledge about the ingestive behavior of bariatric patients one year after RYGB in terms of its association with the achieved weight loss. The use of the drinkometer device for the measurement of microstructure of ingestive behavior should be further expanded to different research questions and patient subgroups other than good responders. Its possible applications in clinical and behavioral research need to be included in the agenda of bariatric research.

The Impact of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients with Morbid Obesity.

The impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has not been widely quantified, and the data in the literature remain controversial. Candidates for LSG underwent barium swallow, esophageal manometry, ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring (APM), and gastric emptying scintigraphy before and after surgery (1 and 18months). Symptoms were evaluated using a gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDq). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed preoperatively in all patients and at 18months postoperatively in patients who had suffered from preoperative esophagitis. Fifty-two patients were included in the study (64.4% women and 34.6% men) with a median age of 46years (25-63years) and BMI of 45.0 ± 5.6kg/m2. The follow-up rates at 1 and 18months were 82.7% and 80.8%. At 18months, the percentage of weight loss (%TWL) was 33.6 ± 10.4% and the percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) was 77.6 ± 25%. Postoperatively, a significant increase in accelerated gastric emptying and impaired esophageal body motility occurred at 1 and 18months. A significant worsening of all the values obtained at both 1 and 18months postoperatively becomes evident when comparing the results of the APM. After surgery, 76.4% of patients had developed "de novo" GERD at 1month and 41% at 18months. No improvement was found in patients with symptomatic GERD. Based on the results of this study, LSG led to a considerable rate of postoperative "de novo" GERD. In addition, no improvement was found in patients with symptomatic GERD.

Predictive Factors of Success in Sleeve Gastrectomy: One-Year Follow-up and the Significance of HALP Score.

To investigate whether HALP score [hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte (LY), platelet] can predict weight loss in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. A cohort study. Department of General Surgery, Balıkesir University, Turkey from July 2019 to July 2020. One-year data of 64 patients, who underwent sleeve gastrectomy due to obesity were included for the analysis. The cut-off value of HALP score was calculated to be 41.2971. Those below the cut-off value were classified into Group 1 (low HALP score) and those above it were classified into Group 2 (high HALP score). Preoperative and postoperative body mass index (BMI), hemotologic parameters, platelet/LY ratios (PLR), and neutrophil/LY ratios (NLR), were compared. According to the percentage of excess BMI loss, patients were divided into 3 groups: Group A (≤40%), Group B (40%-60%), Group C (≥60%). The decrease in postoperative BMI was significantly high in Group 2 (p<0.001). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of percentage change of hemoglobin (p=0.012). The increase in postoperative LY value and decrease in postoperative PLR value were significantly high in Group 1 (p=0.019, p=0.003). Furthermore, patient distribution was significantly different among groups A, B, and C (p <0.001). Comparison of groups showed a significant difference between groups A and B and between groups A and C, but not between groups B and C (p=0.006, p<0.001, and p=0.192, respectively). In patients with high HALP scores, the rate of weight loss was higher, and most of their laboratory parameters were improved compared to those patients with low HALP scores. Key Words: Body mass index, Sleeve gastrectomy, obesity, Weight loss, HAIP score.

Sex disparity in laparoscopic bariatric surgery outcomes: a matched-pair cohort analysis

Men have been historically considered to be higher-risk patients for bariatric surgery compared to women, the perception of which is suggested to be a barrier to bariatric surgery in men. The purpose of this study is to conduct a matched-pair analysis to evaluate sex disparities in laparoscopic bariatric surgery outcomes. Data on patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery from March 2013 to 2017 was collected prospectively. Then, 707 men and 707 women pair-matched for age, preoperative body mass index (BMI) and the procedure type (i.e., sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass) were compared in terms of weight loss, remission of obesity-related comorbidities, and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. There was no difference between the two sexes regarding the operation time, bleeding during surgery and length of postoperative hospital stay. We observed similar total weight loss, BMI loss, and percentage of excess BMI loss at 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively between men and women, with no difference in remission of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia at 12 months. The rate of in-hospital, 30-day and late complications according to Clavien–Dindo classification grades was similar between men and women. Our matched-pair cohort analysis demonstrated that bariatric surgery results in comparable short- and mid-term efficacy in men and women, and is associated with similar rate and severity of postoperative complications between sexes. These findings suggest bariatric surgeons not to consider sex for patient selection in bariatric surgery.

Does weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy contribute to reduction in blood pressure?

Obesity‑related hypertension is a life threatening medical condition that significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases and premature mortality. Effective treatment of obesity may be achieved by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This surgical method contributes not only to sustained weight loss but also to normalization of blood pressure. To evaluate the effect of weight loss after LSG on partial or full control of blood pressure. A retrospective analysis of medical and clinical data of 305 patients who had undergone LSG was performed. The bariatric effect of LSG was assessed by calculating percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL). Blood pressure status after surgery was categorized as partial or full hypertension resolution. A total of 143 patients (46.9%) were diagnosed with hypertension preoperatively with median (IQR) hypertension duration of 7.52 (1.88-13.16) years. Hypertensive patients were older (49 vs 38.5 years) and had higher prevalence of coexisting diseases (type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea) than patients with normal blood pressure. During 1‑year follow up, 90 patients (63%) used lower doses of antihypertensive medications and 33 patients (23%) discontinued the therapy. Twelve months after the surgery, median (IQR) %TWL in the control group was 32.5% (28.1%-37.7%), while in the hypertensive group, 29.1% (25.9%-33.6%) (P <0.001); %EWL was 62.9% (53%-74.6%) and 54.8% (47.4%-68.2%), respectively (P = 0.001), and %EBMIL 73.9% (59.5%-91.2%) and 63% (55%-80.5%), respectively (P = 0.002). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is an effective method for the treatment of obesity‑ related hypertension. However, weight loss induced by LSG does not affect the blood pressure status after the surgery.

High-risk bariatric candidates: does red-flagging predict the post-operative course?

Standards for preoperative bariatric patient selection include a thorough psychological evaluation. Using patients "red-flagged" during preoperative evaluations, this study aims to identify trends in long-term follow-up and complications to further optimize bariatric patient selection. A multidisciplinary team held a case review conference (CRC) to discuss red-flagged patients. A retrospective chart review compared CRC patients to control patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the same interval. Patients under 18 years old, undergoing revisional bariatric surgery, or getting band placement were excluded. High-risk characteristics causing CRC inclusion, preoperative demographics, percent follow-up and other postoperative outcomes were collected up to 5 years postoperatively. If univariate analysis revealed a significant difference between cohorts, multivariable analysis was performed. Two hundred and fifty three patients were red-flagged from 2012 to 2013, of which 79 underwent surgery. After excluding 21 revisions, 3 non-adult patients, and 6 band patients, 55 red-flagged patients were analyzed in addition to 273 control patients. Patient age, sex, initial BMI, ASA, and co-morbidities were similar between groups, though flagged patients underwent RYGB more frequently than control patients. Notably, percent excess BMI loss and percent follow-up (6 months-5 years) were similar. In multivariable analysis, minor complications were more common in flagged patients; and marginal ulcers, endoscopy, and dilation for stenosis were more common in flagged versus control patients who underwent RYGB. Perforation, reoperation, revision, incisional hernia, and internal hernia were statistically similar in both groups, though reoperation was significantly more common in patients with multiple reasons to be flagged compared to controls. Bariatric patients deemed high risk for various psychosocial issues have similar follow-up, BMI loss, and major complications compared to controls. High-risk RYGB patients have greater minor complications, warranting additional counseling of high-risk patients.

Comparative Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Kidney Function.

Obesity and its associated medical problems increase risk of kidney function decline while prior studies suggest that bariatric surgery may improve kidney outcomes. However, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different types of bariatric surgery on kidney function. In this study, we compare the effects of laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) on kidney function one year after surgery. The patients' demographic, medical, and surgical data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, body mass index (BMI), and kidney function tests were obtained before and one year after surgery. Kidney function was evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and spot urine albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR). Changes in eGFR and ACR were compared between LRYGB vs. LOAGB after adjustment for confounders (age, sex, remission of associated medical problems, preoperative BMI, and percentage of excess BMI loss) using ANCOVA model. Both surgical techniques significantly decreased the post-surgery presence of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (p < 0.001 for all paired comparisons). The eGFR level significantly increased and the ACR level significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.001 for all paired comparisons before and after adjustment). However, eGFR and ACR mean differences between LRYGB and LOAGB were not significantly different after adjustment for confounding variables (p = 0.9 and 0.4, respectively). Both LOAGB and LRYGB improved 1-year eGFR and ACR equally independently from weight loss and other confounders.

ANTI-REFLUX PROCEDURES AFTER ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS.

ABSTRACT Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been the choice of bariatric procedure for patients with symptomatic reflux - and is known to be effective in reducing the need for anti-reflux medication postoperatively. However, a small number of RYGB patients can still develop severe reflux symptoms that require a surgical intervention. Aim:To examine and describe the patient population that requires an anti-reflux procedure after RYGB evaluating demographics, characteristics, symptoms and diagnosis Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 32 patients who underwent a hiatal hernia repair and/or Nissen fundoplication after RYGB Jul 1st, 2014 and Dec 31st, 2019. Patients were identified using the MBSAQIP database and their electronic medical records were reviewed. Results: Most patients were female (n=29, 90.6%). The mean age was 52.8 years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 34.1 kg/m2 at the time of anti-reflux procedure. Patients underwent the anti-reflux procedure at a mean of 7.9 years after the RYGB procedure. The mean percentage of excess BMI loss during the time between RYGB and anti-reflux procedure was 63.4%. Conclusions: Female patients with a significant weight loss may develop a severe reflux symptoms years after RYGB. Complaints of reflux after RYGB should not be overlooked. Careful follow-up and appropriate treatment (including surgical intervention) is needed for this population.

Can lower preoperative 48-hour pH score predict reflux resolution after sleeve gastrectomy

BackgroundMorbidly-obese patients with reflux who are undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may experience resolution, or persistent reflux. We studied factors associated with reflux resolution after SG. MethodWe evaluated baseline weight, body mass index, and DeMeester score (DMS) in patients with reflux undergoing SG. Outcome measure was resolution of reflux post-operatively. ResultsStudy group included 70 patients; 33 (47.1%) patients reported resolution of reflux (RR group) after surgery; 37 (52.9%) patients didn’t have resolution (NR group). Pre-operative weight, body mass index, percent excess BMI loss and presence of ≤2 cm hiatal hernia (HH) were similar between the two groups. Males and lower pre-operative DMS were associated with resolution of reflux (18.4 ± 13 vs. 29.1 ± 26, p = 0.03). ConclusionLower pre-SG DeMeester score tend to imply ability to resolve reflux in morbidly-obese patients thus, SG may still be offered, without repair of ≤2 cm HH if present. Unfortunately, it can’t be used as the only factor.

The influence of patient\u2019s age on metabolic and bariatric results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 2-year observation

BackgroundThe incidence of obesity has been constantly growing and bariatric procedures are considered to be the most effective treatment solution for morbidly obese patients. The results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) may differ depending on patient’s age, gender, preoperative body mass index (BMI) and physical activity.MethodsThe aim of this study was to evaluate age-related differences in the outcome of LSG in terms of weight loss parameters, lipid and carbohydrate profile. The retrospective analysis of 555 patients who had undergone LSG was performed to compare the metabolic outcomes of surgery in individuals < 45 and ≥ 45 years old. Evaluation of weight loss parameters along with selected laboratory data was performed to demonstrate the results of LSG in 2 years follow-up.ResultsOverall, 238 males and 317 females (43%/57%) with median age of 43 years and median preoperative BMI of 46.41 (42.06–51.02) kg/m2 were analyzed. Patients in both groups presented significant weight loss at 24 months after the surgery with comparable percentage of total weight loss (40.95% in < 45 years old group and 40.44% in ≥ 45 years old group). The percentage of excess weight loss (78.52% vs. 74.53%) and percentage of excess BMI loss (91.95% vs. 88.01%) were higher in patients < 45 years old. However, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.662, p = 0.788 respectively). Patients under 45 years old experienced faster decrease in fasting glucose level that was observed after only 3 months (109 mg/dl to 95 mg/dl in < 45 years old group vs. 103.5 mg/dl to 99.5 mg/dl in ≥ 45 years old group, p < 0.001). Both groups presented improvement of lipid parameters during the observation. However, patients < 45 years old achieved lower values of LDL at 3 and 12 months follow-up (115 mg/dl vs. 126 mg/dl, p = 0.010; 114.8 mg/dl vs. 122 mg/dl, p = 0.002). Younger group of patients also showed superior improvement of triglycerides level.ConclusionsLSG results in significant weight loss in all patients regardless age. In turn, superior and faster improvement in lipid and carbohydrate profile is achieved in patients under 45 years old.

Should Sleeve Gastrectomy Be Considered Only as a First Step in Super Obese Patients? 5-Year Results From a Single Center.

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been originally conceived as a first step procedure for super obese (SO) patients, but it is currently considered a stand-alone intervention. Medium-term to long-term studies have shown weight regain and risk of de novo gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of SG in SO subjects. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was carried out to find all SO patients who had undergone SG with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Inclusion criteria were preoperative endoscopy negative for esophagitis and/or hiatal hernia, and no GERD or acid reduction medication before SG. Reflux symptoms were evaluated using a validated questionnaire and endoscopy. Remission rates from comorbidities and percentage of excess body mass index (BMI) loss were recorded. A total of 66 (45 male/21 female) patients were included in our study. Mean preoperative BMI and age were 57.4±5.8 kg/m2 and 32.7±11.2 years, respectively. After 5 years, mean percentage of excess BMI loss was 56.42±27.8, and remission rates from hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were 33.3%, 5.3%, and 20%, respectively. After 5 years, new-onset GERD occurred in 66.7% of patients and 33.3% were taking acid reduction medication. Endoscopy revealed 12 (18.2%) cases of esophagitis ≥grade A. After 5 years, weight loss in SO patients is satisfactory, but the vast majority of patients is still in class II obesity, and resolution of comorbidities is disappointing. High rates of de novo GERD and esophagitis may occur.

Outcomes in revisional bariatric surgery: a high-volume single institution experience.

This study aims to evaluate outcomes of adjustable gastric band (AGB) conversion to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), SG conversion to RYGB and RYGB revision procedures. Patients undergoing secondary bariatric surgery between 2009 and 2017 were retrospectively identified from a prospective database. Primary outcomes were weight loss and improvement in comorbidities. For weight loss, percent of total body weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) were included. Comorbidities included were hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), cardiovascular risk (CV) and hypertension. 266 Secondary bariatric procedures were analyzed. There were four Grade IIIb complicationswithin 30days. There was greater %EBMIL at 12 and 24months in the AGB to RYGB group, and in %TWL at 24months compared to AGB to SG group (p < 0.05). Only AGB to RYGB had significantly continued improvement in these two parameters at 24months compared to at 6months post-operatively-%EBMIL and %TWL tapered off in the other procedures. There was significantly lower CV risk in dyslipidemic patients at 24months in the AGB to RYGB compared to the AGB to SG group. In the SG to RYGB patients, there was significant improvement in CV risk in dyslipidemic patients at 24months compared to baseline. There was significant improvement in HbA1C in diabetics in AGB to RYGB patients at 6 and 12months, in AGB to SG patients at 12months, and in SG to RYGB patients at 12 and 24months compared to baseline. In RYGB revision and SG to RYGB patients, there was a relative increase in the number of patients being normotensive at 24months compared to baseline. Secondary bariatric surgery is a complex and challenging procedure that may improve weight loss and cardiovascular risk for certain procedures but further studies will be necessary.

Five-year results after resleeve gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become increasingly popular in bariatric surgery. However, in the long-term follow-up, weight loss failure and intractable severe acid reflux after primary LSG can necessitate further interventions. The aim of our study was to evaluate long-term results 5 years after resleeve gastrectomy (ReSG). Private hospital, France. The study included all patients with failure after LSG who underwent ReSG between October 2008 and January 2014. The patients underwent radiologic evaluation, and an algorithm of treatment was proposed. We analyzed the 5-year outcomes concerning weight loss and long-term complications after ReSG. A total of 52 patients (46 women; mean age 40.2 yr) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 39.4 kg/m2 underwent ReSG. The mean interval time from the primary LSG to ReSG was of 27.8 months (11-72 mo). The indication for ReSG was inadequate weight loss (28 patients; 53.8%), weight regain (22 patients; 42.3%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (2 patients; 3.8%). In 35 cases the contrast agent (diatrizoate meglumine/diatrizoate sodium solution [Gastrografin]) swallow results were interpreted as primary dilation and in the remaining 17 cases as secondary dilation. One patient died from gynecologic cancer. Of the remainder, 3 patients underwent single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass, 5 patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and 1 patient underwent a second ReSG for reflux. A total of 39 of 42 patients with ReSG as definitive procedure had available data at 5-year follow-up. The mean percentage of excess BMI loss was 63.7%. Of the 39 patients, 28 (71.8%) had >50% excess BMI loss at 5 years. Eight of the 11 patients with weight loss failure (<50% excess BMI loss) after ReSG were diagnosed with secondary or diffuse dilation on preoperative imaging; the remaining 3 patients had been operated in our early initial experience with the resleeve procedure. All cases were completed by laparoscopy with no intraoperative incidents. In terms of complications, we recorded 1 leak, 2 stenoses, and 2 cases of bleeding with no mortality. At 5 years postoperative, the ReSG as a definitive bariatric procedure remained effective for 53.8%. The results appear to be more favorable especially for the non-super-obese patients and for those with primary dilation. ReSG is a well-tolerated bariatric procedure with a low long-term complication rate. Further prospective clinical trials are required to compare the outcomes of ReSG with those of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass for weight loss failure after LSG.