Percentage Change In Bone Mineral Density Research Articles

Therapy with transitions from one bone-forming agent to another: a retrospective cohort study on Teriparatide and Romosozumab

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of sequential therapy with a bone formation-promoting agent (either teriparatide or romosozumab) for osteoporosis treatment following prior treatment with the other bone-forming agent (teriparatide or romosozumab). This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study observing two groups for comparison: one with 69 patients transitioning from teriparatide to romosozumab (the T2R group) and the other with 25 patients transitioning from romosozumab to teriparatide (the R2T group), monitored for 12 months on the second drug. Key outcomes included changes in bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover marker changes, and adverse events. The mean ages of each group were 72.3 years in the T2R group and 67.6 years in the R2T group, with the proportions of women being 91.3% and 80.0% respectively. The percent changes of BMD in the lumbar spine after 12 months of sequential therapy were + 10.78% in the T2Rgroup (P<.001 versus baseline) and − 0.02% in the R2T group (P=.875). The percent changes in BMD in the total hip and femoral neck were + 4.41% and + 4.41% in the T2R group, and -1.33% and -0.83% in the R2T group, respectively. When comparing the two groups, BMD changes at all sites in the T2R group were significantly higher than those in the R2T group (P<.001). Furthermore, when examining the changes in the proportion of patients who achieved the osteoporosis treatment goal of a T-score exceeding -2.5, no significant increase was observed in the R2T group, whereas a significant increase was observed in the lumbar spine in the T2R group. Regarding therapy switching between bone-forming agents, this study suggests that transitioning from teriparatide to romosozumab increases BMD more effectively than transitioning in the opposite sequence.

6986 Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Liquid Alendronate Sodium Trihydrate in Korean Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: A 12-Month, Multi-Center, Randomized Trial

Abstract Disclosure: Y. Rhee: None. S. Ahn: None. N. Hong: None. D. Seo: None. S. Hong: None. Background: Although alendronate is the most prescribed oral bisphosphonate for osteoporosis treatment, it can lead to gastrointestinal problems, impacting treatment compliance and efficacy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly alendronate sodium trihydrate (ALN-S), an oral solution, compared to once-weekly alendronate sodium (ALN-T), an oral tablet, in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods: Conducted as a 12-month, multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, parallel trial at two hospitals in Korea, 170 postmenopausal women were randomized to ALN-S (N=85) or ALN-T (N=85). Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) was measured at baseline and after 12 months. Bone turnover markers, including C-telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome was the percentage change in LS BMD, evaluated for non-inferiority. Results: After 12 months, both ALN-S and ALN-T groups exhibited a significant increase in LS, FN, and TH BMD, with no significant intergroup differences (ALN-S: LS 5.0 ± 0.6%, FN 1.8 ± 0.6%, TH 2.2 ± 0.5%; ALN-T: LS 5.2 ± 0.6%, FN 1.6 ± 0.6%, TH 1.8 ± 0.5%). ALN-S was found to be non-inferior to ALN-T for BMD change at LS (treatment difference: -0.22%, 95% CI: -1.84 to 1.40%), excluding the predefined non-inferiority margin of -2.29%. Changes in both CTX and P1NP over time did not significantly differ between the groups. There was no significant difference in the frequency of adverse events between the groups. Conclusion: Weekly liquid alendronate sodium trihydrate demonstrated non-inferiority to weekly tablet alendronate sodium in increasing LS BMD in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Efficacy and safety of teriparatide vs. bisphosphonates and denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in osteoporosis not previously treated with bisphosphonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

SummaryThe study found that in osteoporosis patients who had not previously received bisphosphonate treatment and were in a treatment cycle of over 12 months, both teriparatide and denosumab significantly increased bone mineral density compared to bisphosphonates. Additionally, teriparatide was also shown to significantly decrease the risk of fractures.ObjectiveThe systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of teriparatide vs. bisphosphonates and denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in patients with osteoporosis who had not previously received bisphosphonates.MethodsWe conducted a search of published literature from inception to May 31, 2023, including databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and WanFang. The study only included head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared teriparatide and denosumab with bisphosphonates to treat patients with osteoporosis. Fixed-effect model and random-effect model were used due to clinical heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed via Stata 17.0.ResultsA total of 6680 patients were enrolled across 23 eligible trials. The results of the meta-analysis showed that teriparatide was superior to bisphosphonates in decreasing the risk of fracture (risk ratio (RR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.51, 0.74), P < 0.001). Denosumab showed no benefit compared to bisphosphonates in reducing the risk of fracture in treating osteoporosis (RR 0.99, 95% CI (0.62, 1.57), P = 0.96). Compared with bisphosphonates, teriparatide and denosumab could significantly improve femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, teriparatide and denosumab did not increase the incidence of adverse events (teriparatide vs. bisphosphonates, RR 0.92, 95% CI (0.79, 1.08), P = 0.32; denosumab vs. bisphosphonates, RR 0.98, 95% CI (0.95, 1.02), P = 0.37).ConclusionsTeriparatide is superior to bisphosphonates in decreasing the risk of fracture in patients with osteoporosis. In addition, teriparatide and denosumab were more efficacious than bisphosphonates in increasing the percentage change in BMD at the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine.

Bone Mineral Density Monitoring in Contiguous versus Non-Contiguous Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Introduction: Only change in bone mineral density (BMD) on repeat DXA that exceeds the 95% least significant change (LSC) should be considered clinically meaningful. Frequently lumbar spine DXA must be reported after omitting vertebrae with localized structural artifact, which reduces measurement precision. Previous reports have raised concerns of higher least significant change (LSC) when spine BMD is based on non-contiguous rather than contiguous vertebrae. The current study was performed to compare lumbar spine LSC and BMD response to intervening anti-osteoporosis medication use from non-contiguous versus contiguous vertebrae.Methodology: LSCs for lumbar spine DXA based on L1-L4 and all combinations of non-contiguous and contiguous vertebrae were calculated using 879 scan-pairs from the Manitoba BMD Program. We compared BMD change from these regions, overall and in relation to intervening anti-osteoporosis medication use, in 11,722 patients who had 2 DXA examinations.Results: LSCs were slightly greater when calculated from combinations of fewer than 4 vertebrae, but there was no meaningful difference between contiguous versus non-contiguous vertebrae. There were consistently high correlations between lumbar spine BMD change from L1-L4 and all combinations of continuous and non-contiguous vertebrae (all Pearson r≥ 0.9, p<0.001). Percentage changes in spine BMD and the fraction with treatment-concordant change exceeding the LSC were similar using contiguous or non-contiguous vertebrae.Conclusions: Lumbar spine BMD change can be assessed from 2 or 3 non-contiguous vertebrae when clinically necessary, and precision in such cases is similar to using contiguous vertebrae. Non-contiguous vertebrae can detect treatment-concordant changes similar in spine BMD to contiguous vertebrae.

Real-world effects, safety, and predictors of the effectiveness of romosozumab in primary and secondary osteoporosis: An observational study

Romosozumab is an anti-sclerostin antibody that increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. It became available for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fractures in Japan in 2019. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical effects, safety, and predictors of the effectiveness of 12 months of romosozumab therapy. The study had an observational pre-post design and included 460 patients. Romosozumab was administered at a dose of 210 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 12 months. The incidence of new fractures, safety, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers were recorded. New fractures occurred in 11 cases (3.0 %). Nine patients (2.0 %) experienced cardiovascular events, which were fatal in 3 (0.65 %). Percent changes in BMD at the spine and total hip at 12 months from baseline were +7.7 % and +1.8 %, respectively. Romosozumab had better effects in patients with good renal function, low spine BMD, and high TRACP-5b at baseline and low TRACP-5b or high P1NP after 1 month of treatment. The percent change in spine BMD at 12 months was significantly lower in patients transitioning from denosumab than in those not previously treated with other anti-osteoporosis agents. Romosozumab is considered to be relatively safe in patients with primary osteoporosis compared to those with secondary osteoporosis. Romosozumab resulted in larger increases in spine BMD in patients with primary osteoporosis who were not previously treated with other anti-osteoporosis therapies and those with low spine BMD at the start of treatment.

Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men on Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Japan.

Background and Objectives: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer has greatly improved treatment outcomes. As patient survival rates have increased, reports of decreased bone density and increased bone fractures as side effects of ADT have emerged. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Japanese men was 4.6%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of osteoporosis treatment in prostate cancer patients who underwent ADT in Japan. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 33 male patients who had undergone ADT for prostate cancer, who were noted to have decreased bone density. Mean age was 76.2 ± 7.7 years (64-87). Medications included vitamin D in one case, bisphosphonates (BP) in 27 cases, and denosumab in five cases. The evaluation method examined the rate of change in bone mineral density (BMD) before osteoporosis treatment and 1 year after. For comparison, a group without osteoporosis treatment intervention (n = 33) was selected, and matched for prostate cancer treatment and age. The rate of change in trabecular bone score (TBS) was also calculated. Results: The percentage changes in BMD before and 1 year after treatment were as follows: lumbar spine, 7.1 ± 5.8% in the treatment group versus -3.9 ± 4.1% in the no treatment group; femoral neck, 5.5 ± 6.2% in the treatment group versus -0.9 ± 3.9% in the no treatment group; total femur, 6.6 ± 6.4% in the treatment group versus the no treatment group which was -1.7 ± 3.2%. In all cases, there was a clear significant difference (p < 0.01). The percent change in TBS was further calculated in the same manner. There was no significant difference between the two groups: +1.7 ± 3.8% in the treated group versus +0.3 ± 4.1% in the untreated group. Conclusions: Osteoporosis treatment in Japanese patients with prostate cancer on ADT therapy was found to significantly increase BMD compared to the untreated group. BP and denosumab were found to be very effective in increasing BMD.

Efficacy and Safety of Generic Alendronate for Osteoporosis Treatment.

While osteoporosis increases the risk of fragility fractures, bisphosphonate has been proven to increase bone strength and reduce the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. In addition to its efficacy, substituting the brand with generic medication is a strategy to optimize healthcare expenditures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of generic alendronate treatment and assess potential adverse events in patients with osteoporosis. A retrospective review was conducted on 120 patients who met the indications for osteoporosis treatment, received weekly generic alendronate (70 mg) for >1 year, and underwent evaluation through standard axial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The outcomes of this study were the percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip after one year of treatment. The major adverse events occurring during medication that led to the discontinuation of drug administration were documented. Most patients were female (96.7%) with an average age of 69.0 ± 9.3 years. The percent change in BMD increased at all sites after one year of generic alendronate treatment (lumbar spine: 5.6 ± 13.7, p-value <0.001; femoral neck: 2.3 ± 8.3, p-value = 0.023; total hip: 2.1 ± 6.2, p-value = 0.003), with over 85% of patients experiencing increased or stable BMD. Three patients discontinued the medication due to adverse effects: two had dyspepsia, and one had persistent myalgia. Generic alendronate may be considered an effective antiresorptive agent for osteoporosis treatment with a low incidence of adverse effects.

The effect of daily oral PrEP use during pregnancy on bone mineral density among adolescent girls and young women in Uganda.

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended during pregnancy for at-risk cisgender women. Pregnancy is known to impede bone growth and tenofovir-based PrEP may also yield detrimental changes to bone health. Thus, we evaluated the effect of PrEP use during pregnancy on bone mineral density (BMD). We used data from a cohort of women who were sexually active, HIV-negative, ages 16-25 years, initiating DMPA or choosing condoms for contraception and enrolled in the Kampala Women's Bone Study. Women were followed quarterly with rapid testing for HIV and pregnancy, PrEP dispensation, and adherence counseling. Those who became pregnant were counseled on PrEP use during pregnancy per national guidelines. BMD of the neck of the hip, total hip, and lumbar spine was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and annually. We compared the mean percent change in BMD from baseline to month 24. Among 499 women enrolled in the study, 105 pregnancies occurred in 90 women. At enrollment, the median age was 20 years (IQR: 19-21) and 89% initiated PrEP. During pregnancy, 67% of women continued using PrEP and PrEP was dispensed in 64% of visits. BMD declined significantly in women using PrEP during pregnancy compared to women who were not pregnant nor used PrEP: relative BMD change was -2.26% (95% CI: -4.63 to 0.11, p = 0.06) in the femoral neck, -2.57% (95% CI: -4.48 to -0.66, p = 0.01) in total hip, -3.06% (95% CI: -5.49 to -0.63, p = 0.001) lumbar spine. There was no significant difference in BMD loss when comparing PrEP-exposed pregnant women to pregnant women who never used PrEP. Women who became pregnant were less likely to continue PrEP at subsequent study visits than women who did not become pregnant (adjOR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16-0.37, p < 0.001). Based on pill counts, there was a 62% reduction in the odds of high PrEP adherence during pregnancy (adjOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.27-0.58, p < 0.001). Women who used PrEP during pregnancy experienced a similar reduction in BMD as pregnant women with no PrEP exposure, indicating that BMD loss in PrEP-using pregnant women is largely driven by pregnancy and not PrEP.

Bone mineral density fall during aromatase inhibitor treatment may predict lower breast cancer recurrence.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are associated with reduction in bone mineral density (BMD). The use of bone strengthening agents zoledronic acid and denosumab are associated with improved breast cancer outcomes for post-menopausal patients treated with AIs. This study investigates whether change in BMD with AI therapy is associated with breast cancer recurrence. A cohort of patients treated at a single institution diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with baseline BMD and subsequent BMD test while receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy were studied. Demographic, treatment and outcome data was obtained. Simple and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of annual percent BMD change at the LS and hip. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling were undertaken to investigate predictors of breast cancer recurrence. 353 patients eligible patients were identified. In multivariate analysis of lumbar spine BMD change, the difference between those in quartile 1, which showed the greatest reduction in BMD, and quartile 3, with substantially less reduction, was significant (HR = 3.02, 95% CI 1.15-7.90 p = 0.025). Hip BMD reduction was also not significantly associated with breast cancer recurrence. The two quartiles with the least reduction in hip BMD showing a non-significant reduced risk of recurrence relative to the quartile with the greatest (p = 0.10). The findings suggest an association may exist between lumbar spine BMD change and breast cancer recurrence for patients treated with adjuvant AI. Further research is required to determine whether BMD change can be utilised as a biomarker.

Modulation of Bone Mineral Density and Its Response to Menopausal Hormone Therapy according to the Apolipoprotein E Genotype in Postmenopausal Korean Women.

Genetic factors are a major cause of osteoporosis. The present study evaluated the association of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype with bone mineral density (BMD) and its response to menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in postmenopausal Korean women. This retrospective cohort study included 172 postmenopausal women with no endocrine diseases, medications, or lifestyles that would affect bone metabolism and who were continuously treated with MHT for at least 2 years. BMDs were measured at baseline and periodically. Linear regression analysis demonstrated similar baseline BMDs at the lumbar spine, but significantly lower at the femur neck and total hip in the ApoE ε4 carrier than in the noncarrier group, after controlling for age, body mass index, and history of MHT usage. Overall, the Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated that MHT increased the BMD percentage change at all three regions, and the Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) demonstrated significant time trends at the lumbar spine and femur neck. ApoE ε4 noncarriers exhibited a significant time trend in BMD changes at the femur neck, whereas ε4 carriers exhibited a time trend at the lumbar spine. However, BMD changes at each time point were comparable at all regions between the groups. Notably, GEE adjusted for baseline characteristics and BMD revealed a significant interaction effect of time and ApoE ε4 allele in BMD changes at the femur neck. Postmenopausal Korean women carrying the ApoE ε4 allele demonstrated a lower hip BMD compared with ε4 noncarriers. Furthermore, the ε4 allele may modulate hip BMD responses to MHT.

Coronary artery calcification is associated with smaller increases in femoral neck bone mineral density with anti-resorptive therapy

Abstract Introduction Patients with osteoporosis are at high cardiovascular risk, partly due to vascular calcification, such as in the coronary vessels. It is uncertain if the presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) effects bone mineral density (BMD) response to anti-resorptive treatment – first line therapy for osteoporosis. We therefore assessed changes in BMD following initiation of anti-resorptive treatment for osteoporosis in patients with and without evidence of CAC. Methods Individuals dispensed at least one prescription for an anti-resorptive medication (bisphosphonates or denosumab) at Monash Health between 2009-2022 were identified. Unique record numbers for these individuals were then cross-matched against the cardiac CT imaging service at Monash Heart (HREC#73603). CAC was detected using a 320-slice CT coronary angiogram (CTCA). We included only those patients having a baseline BMD measurement within two years of CTCA. The annualised percentage change in femoral neck BMD was calculated and adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, and number of years on anti-resorptive treatment. Results 106 individuals were identified of which 85 (women=70 [85%], median age=73 years [interquartile range 64-79 years]) had a follow-up BMD measurement including 19 with, and 66 without, evidence of CAC. Those with CAC were older (76 years versus 64 years, p&amp;lt;0.001). There were 70 bisphosphonate users and 15 denosumab users. Individuals with evidence of CAC experienced, on average, a 1.2% lower increase [(0.345% (0.343 to 0.348) versus -0.881% (-0.883 to -0.879), mean difference -1.226% (-1.493 to -0.959; p&amp;lt;0.05)] in annualised femoral neck BMD with anti-resorptive therapy after adjusting for important clinical risk factors. Interpretation These preliminary data suggests that CTCA-determined CAC may negatively impact femoral neck BMD increases with anti-resorptive therapy. This is perhaps consistent with existing and evolving hypotheses of dysregulatory processes driving ectopic calcium deposition, which we surmise would partially counter the effects of anti-resorptive therapy and potentially manifest as CAC. Thus, of particular interest will be the comparison of cardiovascular outcomes of patients with known CAC with and without anti-resorptive therapy, with the hypothesis that anti-resorptive therapy may potentially have cardioprotective effects in context of CAC. Analysis of the full cohort is underway.Table 1

Effect of Pelvic External Beam Radiation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density: A Secondary Analysis of a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial

Pelvic radiation therapy may lead to decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fracture that could be of particular concern in patients with prostate cancer who also receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We performed an exploratory analysis of a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether exposure to prior pelvic external beam radiation therapy (XRT) affects BMD and risk of fracture in patients with prostate cancer treated with ADT. Patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer aged ≥70 years or <70 years with low BMD (T-score < -1) or osteoporotic fracture who had been receiving ADT for ≥12 months were randomly assigned to receive densoumab or placebo every 6 months for 3 years. BMD was measured at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36. We applied multivariable linear mixed-effects models with an interaction term between the treatment arm and exposure to prior pelvic XRT to evaluate differential XRT effect on percent BMD change between the 2 treatment arms. Among 1407 eligible patients, 31% (n = 447) received prior pelvic XRT. There was no significant difference in any clinical fractures among patients with (5.8%, 26 of 447) or without (5.2%, 50 of 960) prior pelvic XRT (P = .42). Prior pelvic XRT was associated with a significant (0.54%) improvement in BMD (95% CI, 0.05-1.02) in the placebo group and a nonsignificant (0.04%) decline in BMD (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.35) in the denosumab group (interaction P = .007). There was no significant difference in pelvic XRT effect on percent BMD change in the lumbar spine (P = .65) or total hip (P = .39) between the 2 treatment groups. We did not find sufficient evidence to suggest any detrimental effect of pelvic XRT on the treatment effect from denosumab on percent BMD change, with only an approximately 5% incidence of clinical fractures.

Associations between Social Isolation Index and changes in grip strength, gait speed, bone mineral density (BMD), and self-reported incident fractures among older adults: Results from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

The aim is to investigate whether social isolation and loneliness are associated with changes in grip strength, gait speed, BMD, and fractures. Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Comprehensive Cohort participants aged 65 years and older at baseline (2012-2015) who completed the three-year follow-up interview (2015-2018) were included in this analysis (n = 11,344). Social isolation and loneliness were measured using the CLSA social isolation index (CLSA-SII, range 0-10). We calculated absolute and percent change in grip strength (kg) and gait speed (m/s) and annualized absolute (g/cm2) and percent change in femoral neck and total hip BMD during the three-year follow-up. Self-reported incident fractures of all skeletal sites in the previous 12 months were measured at three-year follow-up. Multivariable analyses were conducted. Odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported. The mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 72.9 (5.6) years and 49.9% were female. The mean (SD) of CLSA-SII at baseline was 3.5 (1.4). Mean absolute and percentage change (SD) in grip strength (kg) and gait speed (m/s) were -1.33 (4.60), -3.02% (16.65), and -0.05 (0.17), -3.06% (19.28) during the three-year follow-up, respectively. Mean annualized absolute (g/cm2) and percentage change (SD) in femoral neck and total hip BMD were -0.004 (0.010), -0.47% (1.43) and -0.005 (0.009), -0.57% (1.09), respectively. 345 (3.1%) participants had incident fractures. As CLSA-SII increased (per one unit change), participants had 1.13 (adjusted OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.27) times greater odds for incident fractures. The interaction term between the CLSA-SII and centre for epidemiology studies depression 9 scale (CES-D 9) for self-reported incident fractures was shown (interaction OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04). Socially isolated and lonely older adults were more likely to have had incident fractures, but social isolation was not associated with the three-year changes in grip strength, gait speed, or BMD.

Impact of Prior Radiation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density Change Over Time: Secondary Analysis of the Control Arm of a Phase III Randomized Trial

Retrospective studies have demonstrated that pelvic radiation therapy (RT) can lead to decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fracture. This is more relevant for men with prostate cancer (PCa) who often receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in conjunction with RT. We performed a post-hoc secondary analysis of publicly available data of the control arm of a phase III randomized controlled study (NCT00089674) to determine if history of prior pelvic RT affects change in BMD over time in non-metastatic PCa patients treated with ADT. In this study, PCa patients with age ≥70 years or <70 years with low BMD (T-score <-1) or history of osteoporotic fracture, on ADT for at least 12 months were randomized to receive densoumab vs. placebo every 6 months for 3 years. Additionally, all patients received daily vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Randomization was stratified by duration of prior ADT (≤6 months vs >6 months) and age (<70 vs ≥70 years). BMD was measured at baseline, and at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 with blind reading by central reviewer. To model the effect of prior pelvic RT on dynamic change in BMD in the hip, lumbar spine, and femoral neck, we applied separate multivariate linear mixed effect models for each site. Age, ECOG performance score, history and number of prior fractures, smoking history, and years from initial cancer diagnosis were included as fixed covariates while patients were included as random intercepts. Among 734 patients who were randomized to the control arm, 563 participants with baseline and at least one post baseline assessment of BMD were eligible for this analysis. Overall, 34.4% (n = 194) received prior RT. We did not find any significant association of dynamic change in BMD with receipt of prior pelvic RT for left femoral neck (p = 0.7), total hip (p = 0.8), and lumbar spine (p = 0.5), respectively. At 36 months, there was no significant association of prior RT with percent change in BMD in femoral neck (odds ratio [OR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-2.41), total hip (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.43-2.15), and lumbar spine (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.63-6.45). However, note should be made of the opposite direction of association of prior RT with percent BMD change at 36 months for femoral neck and hip versus lumbar spine. In this exploratory analysis of the control arm of a phase III randomized trial, we did not find sufficient evidence of an association between prior pelvic RT and dynamic changes in BMD in femoral neck, hip, and lumbar spine over time in men with non-metastatic PCa and low BMD at baseline. This analysis should be interpreted cautiously considering its post-hoc nature with likely inadequate power, the possibility of selection bias, lack of information on receipt of prior ADT, and missing data in longitudinal assessments.

Relugolix combination therapy in European women with symptomatic uterine fibroids: a subgroup analysis from the randomized phase 3 LIBERTY pivotal trials

Objective In the 24-week, phase 3 LIBERTY 1 (L1) and LIBERTY 2 (L2) trials, relugolix combination therapy (relugolix-CT (relugolix 40 mg, estradiol 1 mg, norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg)) reduced uterine fibroid (UF)-associated symptoms. This post hoc analysis assessed safety and efficacy of relugolix-CT in European women from L1/L2. Methods Premenopausal women (aged 18–50 years) with UF-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) were randomized 1:1:1 in L1 (N = 388) and L2 (N = 382) to relugolix-CT or placebo for 24 weeks, or delayed relugolix-CT (relugolix 40 mg then relugolix-CT; 12 weeks each). Primary endpoint: proportion of responders (menstrual blood loss (MBL) <80 mL and reduction of ≥50% from baseline MBL volume) over the last 35 days of treatment. Secondary endpoints: MBL volume, amenorrhea, UF-associated pain, symptom severity, distress related to bleeding and pelvic discomfort, health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Safety endpoints included adverse event (AE) reporting and bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. Results In European women from L1/L2 (N = 124, 16%), a significantly greater proportion of treatment responders was observed with relugolix-CT vs. placebo (85.4% vs. 19.1%, respectively; nominal p < .0001). There were statistically significant improvements with relugolix-CT vs. placebo for several secondary endpoints: reduction in MBL volume, amenorrhea rate, proportion achieving mild-to-no pain, reduction in symptom severity and distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, and improvement in HRQoL. Incidence of AEs and percentage changes in BMD from baseline to week 24 were similar for relugolix-CT and placebo. Conclusions In European women with UF and HMB, once-daily relugolix-CT vs. placebo improved UF-associated symptoms and preserved BMD.

Changes in Bone Density in Carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants After Salpingo-Oophorectomy.

To evaluate the effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on change in bone mineral density (BMD) in women aged 34-50 years with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA1 /2). The PROSper (Prospective Research of Outcomes after Salpingo-oophorectomy) study is a prospective cohort of women aged 34-50 years with BRCA1 or two germline pathogenic variants that compares health outcomes after RRSO to a non-RRSO control group with ovarian conservation. Women aged 34-50 years, who were planning either RRSO or ovarian conservation, were enrolled for 3 years of follow-up. Spine and total hip BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans obtained at baseline before RRSO or at the time of enrollment for the non-RRSO group, and then at 1 and 3 years of study follow-up. Differences in BMD between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups, as well as the association between hormone use and BMD, were determined by using mixed effects multivariable linear regression models. Of 100 PROSper participants, 91 obtained DXA scans (RRSO group: 40; non-RRSO group: 51). Overall, total spine, and hip BMD decreased significantly from baseline to 12 months after RRSO (estimated percent change -3.78%, 95% CI -6.13% to -1.43% for total spine; -2.96%, 95% CI -4.79% to -1.14% for total hip) and at 36 months (estimated percent change -5.71%, 95% CI -8.64% to -2.77% for total spine; -5.19%, 95% CI -7.50% to -2.87% for total hip. In contrast, total spine and hip BMD were not significantly different from baseline for the non-RRSO group. The differences in mean percent change in BMD from baseline between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups were statistically significant at both 12 and 36 months for spine BMD (12-month difference -4.49%, 95% CI -7.67% to -1.31%; 36-month difference -7.06%, 95% CI -11.01% to -3.11%) and at 36 months for total hip BMD (12-month difference -1.83%, 95% CI -4.23% to 0.56%; 36-month difference -5.14%, 95% CI -8.11% to -2.16%). Across the study periods, hormone use was associated with significantly less bone loss at both the spine and hip within the RRSO group compared with no hormone use ( P <.001 at both 12 months and 36 months) but did not completely prevent bone loss (estimated percent change from baseline at 36 months -2.79%, 95% CI -5.08% to -0.51% for total spine BMD; -3.93%, 95% CI -7.27% to -0.59% for total hip BMD). Women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 /2 who undergo RRSO before the age of 50 years have greater bone loss after surgery that is clinically significant when compared with those who retain their ovaries. Hormone use mitigates, but does not eliminate, bone loss after RRSO. These results suggest that women who undergo RRSO may benefit from routine screening for BMD changes to identify opportunities for prevention and treatment of bone loss. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01948609.

Effect of low dose denosumab on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis after a transition from 60 mg dose: a prospective observational study

IntroductionDenosumab is an effective antiresorptive molecule and reduces the risk of fracture in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Cessation of denosumab therapy however is associated with rapid declines in bone mineral density (BMD), rises in bone remodeling, and an increased risk of fracture. We evaluated the effect of low dose denosumab (30 mg every 6 months) on the prevention of bone loss following a switch from standard dose (60 mg of denosumab every 6 months) in a prospective observational study.MethodsWe recruited 114 women 50–90 years of age with postmenopausal osteoporosis at a moderate fracture risk without prior fragility fractures, who had been on denosumab 60 mg every 6 month. These women switched to low dose denosumab 30 mg every 6 months. Mean percentage change in lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH) and 1/3 distal radius (1/3RAD) BMD at 12 and 24 months were evaluated. Predictors for change in BMD were explored. Subgroup analysis for patients on denosumab 60 mg every 6 months for <3 years and for ≥3 years before switching to low dose denosumab 30 mg was evaluated.ResultsAt 12 months following a switch from 60 mg to 30 mg of denosumab every 6 months we observed an increase in LS BMD mean percentage change (+2.03%, 95% CI 1.18–2.88, p < 0.001). BMD was stable at the hip and radial sites. Age was found to be a predictor of the mean percentage change in LS BMD for the overall sample. At 24 months, there was a further increase in LS BMD mean percentage change (+3.44%, 95% CI 1.74–5.12, p < 0.001), with stable BMD at other skeletal sites. The 12 month mean BMD percentage change at the LS (p = 0.015), FN (p < 0.001), TH (p < 0.001), and 1/3 RAD (p < 0.001) were found to be predictors of the 24 month mean BMD percentage change. No clinical fractures were reported during 24 months of follow up.ConclusionWe observed stable BMD following a switch from denosumab 60 mg every 6 months to 30 mg every 6 months in this prospective observational study conducted in postmenopausal women at a moderate fracture risk

The effect of patient positioning on measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur: a simulation study using computed tomographic images.

Several studies have analyzed the effect of hip rotation on the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, as the effects of hip flexion and abduction on BMD measurements remain uncertain, a computational simulation study using CT images was performed in this study. Hip CT images of 120 patients (33 men and 87 women; mean age, 82.1 ± 9.4 years) were used for analysis. Digitally reconstructed radiographs of the proximal femur region were generated from CT images to calculate the BMD of the proximal femur region. BMD at the neutral position was quantified, and the percent changes in BMD when hip internal rotation was altered from -30° to 15°, when hip flexion was altered from 0° to 30°, and when hip abduction was altered from -15° to 30° were quantified. Analyses were automatically performed with a 1° increment in each direction using computer programming. The alteration of hip angles in each direction affected BMD measurements, with the largest changes found for hip flexion (maximum change of 17.7% at 30° flexion) and the smallest changes found for hip rotation (maximum change of 2.2% at 15° internal rotation). The BMD measurements increased by 0.34% for each 1° of hip abduction, and the maximum change was 12.3% at 30° abduction. This simulation study quantified the amount of BMD change induced by altering the hip position. Based on these results, we recommend that patients be positioned carefully when acquiring DXA images.

Bisphosphonates Alleviate Bone Loss in People with Acute Spinal Cord Injury：A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bone loss is not to be underestimated in people with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Bisphosphonates can inhibit the bone resorption of osteoclast. To study whether the early application of bisphosphonates can alleviate bone loss after acute SCI, we included 7 randomized controlled trials for meta-analysis. Seven randomized controlled trials were found in literature databases. The percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) at different sites were primary outcomes and serum bone turnover markers were secondary outcomes. A random-effects model was selected for meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the percentage change in BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck between the bisphosphonates and control groups, but not in the percentage change in distal femur BMD. Besides, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the bone formation marker Procollagen type 1N propeptide; bisphosphonates were effective in reducing the C-terminal telopeptide at the 6-month follow-up, but not at the 12-month follow-up. Subgroup analysis of the effects of zoledronate showed positive effects on BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at the 6-month follow-up and showed positive effects on BMD of the total hip and femoral neck at the 12-month follow-up. Bisphosphonates can effectively alleviate the bone loss of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck in patients with acute SCI, and early application is advocated.

OR01-5 Transition From Low Dose Denosumab 30mg to IV Zoledronic Acid: Effect on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: A Prospective Observational Study

Abstract Introduction Cessation of denosumab(Dmab), a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANK-ligand, is associated with rises in bone remodelling, reductions in bone mineral density(BMD) and an increased fracture risk. We previously reported that BMD was stable following a switch from Dmab 60mg to 30mg in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at a moderate fracture risk(1). The primary objective of this extension study is to evaluate the effect of switching patients from 30mg Dmab(6monthly) to IV Zoledronic acid (ZA), administered 6 months following the last dose of Dmab, in preventing bone loss in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who are no longer at a high fracture risk. Methods Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at a moderate or low fracture risk, previously on 30mg of Dmab 6monthly were switched to receive 5mg of IV ZA. Exclusion criteria included an additional skeletal disorder, prior fragility fracture, or use of oral steroids (daily in the past 12months). The primary endpoints were the mean percent change in BMD at the lumbar spine(LS), total hip(TH), femoral neck(FN) and 1/3radius(1/3R), as well as the percent change in alkaline phosphatase(ALP) at 24 months compared to baseline, following transition to IV ZA. Secondary outcomes were clinical fractures. Results 8 patients were included in the study. The mean duration of 30mg Dmab prior switching to IV ZA was 14.6 ± 2.8 months. Mean percent change in BMD at LS was -3.04(CI: 5.77, -0.32, p =0.033) and mean absolute change was -0.025gm/cm2(CI: -0.048, -0.002, p=0.038). The percent change at the TH was -2.64(CI: -4.97, -0.31, p=0.031) with a mean absolute change of -0.021 gm/cm2(CI: -0.040, -0.002, p=0.038). There were no statistically significant changes at the FN, or 1/3R sites at 24months post IV ZA. ALP showed 45.5% increase on average at 24months compared to baseline(95% CI: 14.1, 76.9, p=0.011). No clinical fractures were observed. Conclusions We observed a statistically significant decline in mean percent change in BMD at the LS and TH following a switch from 30mg Dmab to IV ZA at 24months following IV ZA administration. This is similar to the data seen following a switch from standard dose Dmab(60mg 6monthly) to IV ZA(2). The small decline in BMD seen maybe within the precision error of the assessment and this requires further evaluation in a larger number of patients. This was associated with a rise in ALP, however we did not observe any clinical fractures in this study.