Percent Change In Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Research Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Ongericimab in Chinese Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed Dyslipidemia.

A phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ongericimab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, as an add-on treatment to optimized lipid-lowering therapy in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia. A total of 806 patients who were receiving stable and optimized lipid-lowering therapy but did not achieve their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 2:1:2:1 ratio to receive either ongericimab 150 mg or matching placebo every 2 weeks, or ongericimab 300 mg or matching placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in 802 patients who received at least 1 dose of ongericimab or placebo. The primary end point was the percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24. Our findings demonstrated that the least-squares mean difference of percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 was -67.7% (95% CI, -72.5% to -63.0%; P<0.0001) in the ongericimab 150 mg every 2 weeks group compared with the placebo every 2 weeks group, and -61.2% (95% CI, -67.1% to -55.2%; P<0.0001) in the ongericimab 300 mg every 4 weeks group compared with the placebo every 4 weeks group. These reductions were sustained up to week 52. Furthermore, treatment with ongericimab favorably altered other lipid parameters. A similar incidence of adverse events was observed in the ongericimab and placebo groups. Ongericimab, as an add-on treatment to optimized lipid-lowering therapy, significantly reduced LDL-C and was well-tolerated in Chinese patients with primary hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia who did not achieve their LDL-C targets. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04781114.

Randomized Trial of a Vascular Care Team vs Education for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

BackgroundUnderutilization of therapies to reduce ischemic risk in peripheral artery disease (PAD) persists. ObjectivesThe purpose was to conduct an implementation trial of lipid management in vascular disease. MethodsThe OPTIMIZE PAD-1 (Implementation of Vascular Care Team to Improve Medical Management of PAD Patients) trial randomized patients with peripheral artery disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥70 mg/dL to management via a vascular care team including a clinical pharmacist and an algorithm of intensive lipid management to achieve goal LDL-C in 1 step vs usual care plus provider education. Medications were obtained using commercial insurance. The primary endpoint was percent change in LDL-C at 12 months. ResultsOf 166 enrolled patients, 74.2% did not have an LDL-C level at goal. Among 114 randomized patients (mean age 66 years, 36.0% women, and 15.8% Black), 50.9% received high-intensity statin, and 7.9% received ezetimibe at baseline. The mean 12-month LDL-C change was −49.1% (95% CI: −58.7% to −39.5%) with vascular care team management and −5.4% (95% CI: −15.3% to 4.6%) with usual care; the between-group least-squares mean difference was −43.7% (95% CI: −57.6% to −29.9%; P < 0.0001). Mean LDL-C was reduced in vascular care team patients from 100.6 mg/dL at baseline to 54.8 and 50.1 mg/dL by week 4 and month 12, respectively. At 12 months, vascular care team patients were >3 times as likely to achieve LDL-C <70 mg/dL and 8 times as likely to achieve LDL-C <55 mg/dL (P < 0.0001) than usual care. ConclusionsOPTIMIZE PAD-1 showed that an interprofessional, algorithm-based program can achieve rapid LDL-C lowering in vascular patients using available insurance and therapies, and LDL-C targets can be met in most patients if enabled by optimized systems of care.

Obicetrapib on top of maximally tolerated lipid‐modifying therapies in participants with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: rationale and designs of BROADWAY and BROOKLYN

Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events. BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a) and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024. These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated.

A Technology-Assisted Web Application for Consumer Access to a Nonprescription Statin Medication

BackgroundAlthough statins reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes, less than one-half of eligible patients receive treatment. A nonprescription statin has the potential to improve access to statins. ObjectivesThis study sought to assess concordance between clinician and consumer assessment of eligibility for nonprescription statin treatment using a technology assisted self-selection Web application (Web App) and evaluate effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. MethodsThis study was a prospective actual use 6-month study to evaluate use of a Web App to qualify participants without a medical background for a moderate-intensity statin based on current guidelines. Participants entered demographic information, cholesterol values, blood pressure, and concomitant medications into the Web App, resulting in 3 possible outcomes: “do not use,” “ask a doctor,” and “OK to use.” ResultsThe study included 1,196 participants, with a median age of 63 years (Q1-Q3: 57-68 years); 39.6% were women, 79.3% were White, 11.7% were Black, and 4.1% had limited literacy. Mean LDL-C was 139.6 ± 28.3 mg/dL and the median calculated 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was 10.1% (Q1-Q3: 7.3%-14.0%). Initial Web App self-selection resulted in an outcome concordant with clinician assessment in 90.7% (95% CI: 88.9%-92.3%) of participants, and 98.1% (95% CI: 97.1%-98.8%) had a concordant final use outcome during treatment. Mean percent change in LDL-C was −35.5% (95% CI: −36.6% to −34.3%). Serious adverse events occurred in 27 (2.3%) participants, none related to the study drug. ConclusionsIn this actual use study, a technology-assisted Web App allowed >90% of consumers to correctly self-select for statin use and achieve clinically important LDL-C reductions. (Technology-Assisted Cholesterol Trial in Consumers [TACTiC]; NCT04964544)

An “Inclisiran First” Strategy vs Usual Care in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

BackgroundMost patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease fail to achieve guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Twice-yearly inclisiran lowers LDL-C by ∼50% when added to statins. ObjectivesThis study evaluated the effectiveness of an “inclisiran first” implementation strategy (adding inclisiran immediately upon failure to reach LDL-C <70 mg/dL despite receiving maximally tolerated statins) vs representative usual care in U.S. patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. MethodsVICTORION-INITIATE, a prospective, pragmatically designed trial, randomized patients 1:1 to inclisiran (284 mg at days 0, 90, and 270) plus usual care (lipid management at treating physician’s discretion) vs usual care alone. Primary endpoints were percentage change in LDL-C from baseline and statin discontinuation rates. ResultsWe randomized 450 patients (30.9% women, 12.4% Black, 15.3% Hispanic); mean baseline LDL-C was 97.4 mg/dL. The “inclisiran first” strategy led to significantly greater reductions in LDL-C from baseline to day 330 vs usual care (60.0% vs 7.0%; P < 0.001). Statin discontinuation rates with “inclisiran first” (6.0%) were noninferior vs usual care (16.7%). More “inclisiran first” patients achieved LDL-C goals vs usual care (<70 mg/dL: 81.8% vs 22.2%; <55 mg/dL: 71.6% vs 8.9%; P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and serious TEAE rates compared similarly between treatment strategies (62.8% vs 53.7% and 11.5% vs 13.4%, respectively). Injection-site TEAEs and TEAEs causing treatment withdrawal occurred more commonly with “inclisiran first” than usual care (10.3% vs 0.0% and 2.6% vs 0.0%, respectively). ConclusionsAn “inclisiran first” implementation strategy led to greater LDL-C lowering compared with usual care without discouraging statin use or raising new safety concerns. (A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of an “Inclisiran First” Implementation Strategy to Usual Care on LDL Cholesterol [LDL-C] in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated LDL-C [≥70 mg/dL] Despite Receiving Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy [VICTORION-INITIATE]; NCT04929249)

Alirocumab in Pediatric Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Many pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) cannot reach recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations on statins alone and require adjunct lipid-lowering therapy (LLT); the use of alirocumab in pediatric patients requires evaluation. To assess the efficacy of alirocumab in pediatric patients with inadequately controlled HeFH. This was a phase 3, randomized clinical trial conducted between May 2018 and August 2022 at 43 centers in 24 countries. Pediatric patients aged 8 to 17 years with HeFH, LDL-C 130 mg/dL or greater, and receiving statins or other LLTs were included. Following consecutive enrollment into dosing cohorts, 25 of 99 patients screened for dosing every 2 weeks (Q2W) failed screening; 25 of 104 patients screened for dosing every 4 weeks (Q4W) failed screening. A total of 70 of 74 Q2W patients (95%) and 75 of 79 Q4W patients (95%) completed the double-blind period. Patients were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous alirocumab or placebo and Q2W or Q4W. Dosage was based on weight (40 mg for Q2W or 150 mg for Q4W if <50 kg; 75 mg for Q2W or 300 mg for Q4W if ≥50 kg) and adjusted at week 12 if LDL-C was 110 mg/dL or greater at week 8. After the 24-week double-blind period, patients could receive alirocumab in an 80-week open-label period. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 in each cohort. Among 153 patients randomized to receive alirocumab or placebo (mean [range] age, 12.9 [8-17] years; 87 [56.9%] female), alirocumab showed statistically significant reductions in LDL-C vs placebo in both cohorts at week 24. Least squares mean difference in percentage change from baseline was -43.3% (97.5% CI, -56.0 to -30.7; P < .001) Q2W and -33.8% (97.5% CI, -46.4 to -21.2; P < .001) Q4W. Hierarchical analysis of secondary efficacy end points demonstrated significant improvements in other lipid parameters at weeks 12 and 24 with alirocumab. Two patients receiving alirocumab Q4W experienced adverse events leading to discontinuation. No significant difference in adverse event incidence was observed between treatment groups. Open-label period findings were consistent with the double-blind period. The findings in this study indicate that alirocumab Q2W or Q4W significantly may be useful for reducing LDL-C and other lipid parameters and be well tolerated in pediatric patients with HeFH inadequately controlled with statins. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03510884.

Effectiveness of Lipid-lowering Therapy for the Secondary Prevention and Achievement of Therapeutic Goals in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases in Accordance with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2018 Guidelines on the Management of Blood Cholesterol

Introduction: According to the India Report 2020, Kerala had the highest prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). Dyslipidemia is a modifiable risk factor that can prevent secondary events. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2018 Guidelines for the management of blood cholesterol for secondary prevention of clinical ASCVD recommend high-intensity statins and moderate-intensity statin combination therapy for achieving target low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). We conducted a study to evaluate the achievement of therapeutic goals in accordance with the guidelines in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and twenty adult patients prescribed with high-intensity statin monotherapy (atorvastatin 40 mg, rosuvastatin 20 mg, and rosuvastatin 40 mg) or moderate-intensity statin combination therapy (atorvastatin 10 mg and fenofibrate 145 mg) for the secondary prevention of ASCVD event were included. Data were collected from the medical records and patient interviews. Achievement of the therapeutic goal of LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL in accordance with guidelines was evaluated and compared; the mean percentage change in LDL-C was at the baseline and after 3 months. Patients were counselled on lifestyle modifications and educated about hypolipidemic agents. Since we are aiming for secondary prevention, the patients were given appropriate counselling concerning their disease and medications they are on. Dietary lifestyle modifications were also taught. Results: One hundred and thirty-eight patients achieved the therapeutic goal, with atorvastatin 40 mg (89.37%) being the most prescribed drug, followed by rosuvastatin 20 mg (5.62%) while rosuvastatin 40 mg had a higher efficacy with mean LDL reduction 65.71 ± 15.93 at 3 months follow-up. Comparing the adherence scores before and after patient counseling, the P value was found to be &lt; 0.001, indicating it is significant. Conclusion: Lifestyle modifications and lipid-lowering therapy are crucial to tackle dyslipidemia. Poor achievement of therapeutic goals implies the need for adopting measures to improve adherence and health-related outcomes for patients with ASCVD.

Differential effect of atorvastatin and pravastatin on thoracic spine attenuation: A sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundStatins reduce cardiovascular events and may improve bone mineral density. MethodsWe conducted a sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial that investigated the differential effect of moderate vs intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapies on coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, and used the acquired images to assess the change in radiological attenuation of selected thoracic vertebrae. Baseline and 12-month unenhanced chest CT scans were performed in 420 hyperlipidemic, postmenopausal women randomized to atorvastatin (ATV) 80 mg/day or pravastatin (PRV) 40 mg/day in the Beyond Endorsed Lipid Lowering with Electron Beam Tomography Scanning (BELLES) trial. Bone attenuation was measured in three contiguous thoracic vertebrae at baseline and 12 months. ResultsThere were no differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between treatment arms. The median percent lowering (interquartile range) in LDL-C was significantly greater with ATV than PRV [-53 (-69 to 20)% vs −28 (-55 to 74)%, p < 0.001], although the CAC score change was similar [12 (-63 to 208)% vs 13 (-75 to 358)%; p = 0.44]. At follow-up, the median bone attenuation loss was significantly greater with PRV than with ATV [-2.6 (-27 to 11)% vs 0 (-11 to 25)%; p < 0.001]. The attenuation loss in the PRV group was comparable to that of a historical untreated general population sample. In the entire cohort, the changes in LDL-C and total cholesterol were inversely correlated with bone attenuation change (p < 0.01). In adjusted multivariable linear regression analyses, race and percent change in LDL-C were independent predictors of bone attenuation change. Age, body mass index, history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, or hormone replacement therapy did not affect percent change in BMD. ConclusionsThese findings support the hypothesis that there is an interaction between bone and cardiometabolic health and that intensive lipid lowering has a beneficial effect on bone health.

Proprotein convertase subtilisn/kexin type 9 inhibitors and small interfering RNA therapy for cardiovascular risk reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Atherosclerosis occurs due to accumulation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) in the arterial system. Thus, lipid lowering therapy is essential for both primary and secondary prevention. Proprotein convertase subtilisn/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (Evolocumab, Alirocumab) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapy (Inclisiran) have been demonstrated to lower LDL-c and ASCVD events in conjunction with maximally tolerated statin therapy. However, the degree of LDL-c reduction and the impact on reducing major adverse cardiac events, including their impact on mortality, remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors and small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapy on LDL-c reduction and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov until April 2023, we extracted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PCSK9 inhibitors (Evolocumab, Alirocumab) and siRNA therapy (Inclisiran) for lipid lowering and risk of MACE. Using random-effects models, we pooled the relative risks and 95% CIs and weighted least-squares mean difference in LDL-c levels. We estimated odds ratios with 95% CIs among MACE subtypes and all-cause mortality. Fixed-effect model was used, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. In all, 54 studies with 87,669 participants (142,262 person-years) met criteria for inclusion. LDL-c percent change was reported in 47 studies (n = 62,634) evaluating two PCSK9 inhibitors and siRNA therapy. Of those, 21 studies (n = 41,361) included treatment with Evolocumab (140mg), 22 (n = 11,751) included Alirocumab (75mg), and 4 studies (n = 9,522) included Inclisiran (284mg and 300mg). Compared with placebo, after a median of 24 weeks (IQR 12-52), Evolocumab reduced LDL-c by -61.09% (95% CI: -64.81, -57.38, p<0.01) and Alirocumab reduced LDL-c by -46.35% (95% CI: -51.75, -41.13, p<0.01). Inclisiran 284mg reduced LDL-c by -54.83% (95% CI: -59.04, -50.62, p = 0.05) and Inclisiran 300mg reduced LDL-c by -43.11% (95% CI: -52.42, -33.80, p = 0.01). After a median of 8 months (IQR 6-15), Evolocumab reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), OR 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.81, p<0.01), coronary revascularization, 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.84, p<0.01), stroke, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.94, p = 0.01) and overall MACE 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.89, p<0.01). Alirocumab reduced MI, 0.57 (0.38, 0.86, p = 0.01), cardiovascular mortality 0.35 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.77, p = 0.01), all-cause mortality 0.60 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.84, p<0.01), and overall MACE 0.35 (0.16, 0.77, p = 0.01). PCSK9 inhibitors (Evolocumab, Alirocumab) and siRNA therapy (Inclisiran) significantly reduced LDL-c by >40% in high-risk individuals. Additionally, both Alirocumab and Evolocumab reduced the risk of MACE, and Alirocumab reduced cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

Abstract 11893: Efficacy and Safety of Ongericimab in Chinese Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed Dyslipidemia

Background: Ongericimab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in the phase 2 trial. A phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ongericimab in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia on background lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week trial conducted in China (NCT02662569). Eligible patients receiving stable statin (±ezetimibe) therapy but not achieving LDL-C goals were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1:2:1 ratio to receive either ongericimab 150 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks (Q2W), or ongericimab 300 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24. Results: A total of 806 patients were randomized, 802 patients received at least one dose of ongericimab or placebo. The least-squares (LS) mean difference between ongericimab and placebo in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 was -67.7% (95% CI: -72.49%, -62.99%; p &lt; 0.0001) in Q2W group and -61.2% (95% CI: -67.09%, -55.21%; p &lt; 0.0001) in Q4W group. LDL-C reductions were maintained to Week 52. Ongericimab also favorably altered other lipid parameters (Table 1). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between ongericimab and placebo. Conclusion: Ongericimab on stable background LLT significantly reduced LDL-C and was well tolerated in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia.

Inclisiran in patients with prior myocardial infarction: A post hoc pooled analysis of the ORION-10 and ORION-11 Phase 3 randomised trials

Background and aimsAmong patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI), the risk of future ischaemic cardiovascular events is increased, and intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is indicated to achieve guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Here, the efficacy and safety of inclisiran, a small interfering ribonucleic acid, were evaluated in patients with or without prior MI from the pooled ORION-10 and ORION-11 Phase 3 trials. MethodsPatients (n = 2636) were randomised 1:1 to receive 284 mg inclisiran (300 mg inclisiran sodium) or placebo on Day 1, Day 90, and 6-monthly thereafter over 18 months, along with background oral LLT, including statins. Of these, 1643 (62.3%) patients had an MI prior to randomisation, stratified as recent (>3 months to <1 year) or remote (≥1 year), and 993 (37.7%) patients were without a prior MI. The percentage change in LDL-C from baseline and safety were assessed. ResultsBaseline characteristics were well balanced across the treatment arms and MI strata. The mean (95% confidence interval) placebo-corrected LDL-C reductions from baseline to Day 510 with inclisiran were 52.6% (40.1, 65.1), 50.4% (47.0, 53.8), and 51.6% (47.4, 55.9) for recent, remote, and no prior MI, respectively. Corresponding time-adjusted LDL-C reductions were 50.0% (41.4, 58.7), 52.2% (49.8, 54.7), and 51.2% (48.1, 54.2). In each MI stratum, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at the injection site (all mild to moderate) were observed more in inclisiran-treated patients than placebo, without an excess of other TEAEs. ConclusionsInclisiran provided effective and consistent LDL-C lowering, irrespective of MI status.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Pill Combination of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in Chinese Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia Inadequately Controlled by Statin Treatment (ROZEL): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Many patients with primary hypercholesterolemia do not achieve their plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals with statin alone under a recommended dose of statin (e.g., 10 mg rosuvastatin) in China. The objective of this phase III study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new single-pill combination (SPC) of rosuvastatin 10 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (R10/E10) in this population. This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia inadequately controlled with statin alone. The participants were randomized 1:1 to receive SPC R10/E10 or R10. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of SPC R10/E10 vs. R10 in reducing the LDL-C levels after 8 weeks. This trial randomized 305 participants to SPC R10/E10 (n = 153) and R10 (n = 152). The superiority of SPC R10/E10 over R10 was demonstrated with the least square (LS) mean difference of percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 8: - 13.85% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 20.15% to - 7.56%, P < 0.0001). The proportion of participants who achieved the LDL-C target (< 2.6 mmol/l) at week 8 was larger with SPC R10/E10 (n = 80, 54.1%) than with R10 (n = 42, 29.2%) (Odds ratio = 2.80, 95% CI 1.70 to 4.61, P < 0.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported. The results suggest that SPC R10/E10 improve LDL-C reduction and goal achievement in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled on statin therapy, without new safety findings. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04669041).

Efficacy and safety of inclisiran in patients with cerebrovascular disease: ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11

Patients with cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) have been shown to benefit from lipid-lowering therapies, but guideline-recommended levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are often not attained with statin treatment alone. The ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of inclisiran in 3660 primary and secondary prevention patients with hyperlipidemia despite maximum tolerated statin treatment. This pooled post hoc analysis comprised 202 randomized patients from those trials with established CeVD who had received either 284 mg inclisiran (equivalent to 300 mg inclisiran sodium, n = 110) or placebo (n = 92) on Days 1, 90, and 6-monthly thereafter up to Day 540. At baseline, mean (SD) LDL-C was 108.4 (34.3) mg/dL and 110.5 (35.3) mg/dL in inclisiran and placebo arms, respectively. Inclisiran produced a mean (95% CI) placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 of –55.2 (–64.5 to –45.9; p < 0.0001); the corresponding time-adjusted percentage change from baseline after Day 90 and up to Day 540 was –55.2 (–62.4 to –47.9; p < 0.0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs at the injection site, mostly mild, were more frequent with inclisiran versus placebo (82.7% vs 70.7% and 3.6% vs 0%, respectively). In patients with CeVD, twice-yearly dosing with inclisiran (after the initial and 3-month doses) in combination with maximally tolerated statins provided effective and consistent LDL-C reductions and was well tolerated.

Phase 2b Randomized Trial of the Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor MK-0616

BackgroundMK-0616 is an oral macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) in development for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. ObjectivesThis Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MK-0616 in participants with hypercholesterolemia. MethodsThis trial was planned to include 375 adult participants with a wide range of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Participants were assigned randomly (1:1:1:1:1 ratio) to MK-0616 (6, 12, 18, or 30 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary endpoints included percentage change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8 and the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs) and study intervention discontinuations due to AEs; participants were monitored for AEs for an additional 8 weeks after the 8-week treatment period. ResultsOf the 381 participants randomized, 49% were female, and the median age was 62 years. Among 380 treated participants, all doses of MK-0616 demonstrated statistically significant (P < 0.001) differences in least squares mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Week 8 vs placebo: –41.2% (6 mg), –55.7% (12 mg), –59.1% (18 mg), and –60.9% (30 mg). AEs occurred in a similar proportion of participants in the MK-0616 arms (39.5% to 43.4%) as placebo (44.0%). Discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 2 or fewer participants in any treatment group. ConclusionsMK-0616 demonstrated statistically significant and robust, dose-dependent placebo-adjusted reductions in LDL-C at Week 8 of up to 60.9% from baseline and was well tolerated during 8 weeks of treatment and an additional 8 weeks of follow-up. (A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0616 [Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor] in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia [MK-0616-008]; NCT05261126)

Abstract 10921: Efficacy and Safety of Ongericimab in Chinese Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder with extremely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels that contributes to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and death, even in adolescent. Ongericimab, a monoclonal antibody against human proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), inhibits PCSK9-mediated degradation of LDL receptor (LDLR), and reduces LDL-C by 58.3-66.5% in Chinese patients with hyperlipidemia. Due to the high genetic heterogeneity of HoFH, the LDL-C lowering effect of Ongericimab remains elusive in Chinese population. This is the first study to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-PCSK9 antibody in Chinese patients with HoFH. Methods: This is a single arm, open-label phase 2 study. 31 patients (aged ≥12 years) with HoFH diagnosed by clinical or genetic criteria, on stable lipid-lowering therapies for ≥4 weeks, were enrolled to receive subcutaneous Ongericimab 450 mg every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage change in LDL-C from baseline at week 12. Results: At the time of this interim analysis, 30 out of 31 patients completed 12 weeks treatment. All patients were on statins (77.4% on high intensity statin) and the mean (SD) baseline LDL-C was 8.6 (3.1) mmol/L. The least squares mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline was -12.6% (95% CI: -19.7%, -5.6%; p=0.001) at week 12. Further analysis based on residual LDLR activity, the mean (SD) LDL-C change from baseline was -21.7 (28.0)% in 14 patients with defective LDLR (at least one defective allele) and -1.4 (9.6)% in 7 patients with negative LDLR (at least one negative allele), respectively (Figure 1). No serious side effects were reported. Conclusion: Ongericimab was well tolerated and significantly reduced LDL-C levels in Chinese patients with HoFH. Patients with defective LDLR demonstrated better response than those with negative LDLR.

Effect of Atorvastatin on Serial Changesin Coronary Physiology andPlaque Parameters.

The effects of statin on coronary physiology have not been well evaluated. The authors performed this prospective study to investigate changes in coronary flow indexes and plaque parameters, and their associations with atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Ninety-five patients with intermediate CAD who received atorvastatin therapy underwent comprehensive physiological assessments with fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and intravascular ultrasound at the index procedure, and underwent the same evaluations at 12-month follow-up. Optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was defined as LDL-C<70mg/dL or≥50% reduction from the baseline. The primary endpoint was a change in the FFR. Baseline FFR, minimal lumen area, and percent atheroma volume (PAV) were 0.88 ± 0.05, 3.87 ± 1.28, 55.92 ± 7.30, respectively. During 12months, the percent change in LDL-C was -33.2%, whereas FFR was unchanged (0.87 ± 0.06 at 12months; P=0.694). Vessel area, lumen area, and PAV were significantly decreased (all P values<0.05). The achieved LDL-C level and the change of PAV showed significant inverse correlations with the change in FFR. In patients with optimally modified LDL-C, the FFR had increased (0.87 ± 0.06 vs 0.89 ± 0.07; P=0.014) and the PAV decreased (56.81 ± 6.44% vs 55.18 ± 8.19%; P=0.031), whereas in all other patients, the FFR had decreased (0.88 ± 0.05 vs 0.86 ± 0.06; P=0.025) and the PAV remained unchanged. In patients with CAD, atorvastatin did not change FFR despite a decrease in the PAV. However, in patients who achieved the optimal LDL-C target level with atorvastatin, the FFR had significantly increased with decrease of the PAV. (Effect of Atorvastatin on Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Artery Disease [FORTE]; NCT01946815).

Safety and efficacy of inclisiran in South African patients at high cardiovascular risk: A subanalysis of the ORION phase III clinical trials

Background. Inclisiran significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in individuals with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or ASCVD risk equivalents (type 2 diabetes, familial hypercholesterolaemia or a 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event ≥20%) in the ORION phase III clinical trials. Infrequent dosing at days 1, 90, 270 and 450 resulted in a mean LDL-C reduction of ~50%. A total of 298 participants from South Africa (SA) were enrolled. Local data are needed to support the use of inclisiran in the SA population, potentially addressing an unmet need for additional LDL-C-lowering therapies. Objectives. To analyse the ORION phase III trial data to assess the efficacy and safety of inclisiran in SA participants. Methods. ORION-9, 10 and 11 were randomised, double-blind, phase III trials. Participants were receiving maximally tolerated statins with or without other lipid-lowering therapies (excluding protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors). Participants were randomised 1:1 to inclisiran sodium 300 mg/284 mg (free acid) or placebo administered at days 1, 90, 270 and 450. The co-primary endpoints were the LDL-C percentage change from baseline to day 510 and the time-averaged percentage change in LDL-C from baseline after day 90 up to day 540. Key secondary endpoints included the absolute change in LDL-C from baseline to day 510, the time-averaged absolute change from baseline after day 90 up to day 540, and changes in other lipids and lipoproteins. Results. The mean age of the participants was 58.6 years (56% male). The mean LDL-C level at baseline was 3.6 mmol/L. At day 510, inclisiran reduced LDL-C levels by 54.2% compared with placebo (95% confidence interval (CI) –61.3 - –47.2; p&lt;0.0001). The corresponding time-averaged reduction in LDL-C was 52.8% (95% CI –57.9 - –47.8; p&lt;0.0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site were more common with inclisiran compared with placebo (10.1% v. 0.7%); however, all were mild or moderate in nature and none were persistent. Conclusion. Inclisiran, given in addition to maximally tolerated standard lipid-lowering therapy, is effective and safe and results in robust reductions in LDL-C in SA patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Abstract P125: Change In Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol And Risk Of Subsequent Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Myocardial Infarction

Background: Among patients who experience a myocardial infarction (MI), elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major risk factor for experiencing a subsequent cardiovascular (CV) event; however, real-world evidence is lacking in regard to how changes in LDL-C levels after a MI hospitalization are related to subsequent CV events. Methods: Adults with a hospitalized MI and an available baseline LDL-C (closest LDL-C within 2 years prior to hospital discharge) between 2012 and 2018 within a 27-county region across MN and WI were included for study. For each LDL-C measurement during follow-up (starting with the first LDL-C &gt;30 days after baseline and ≤1-year post-discharge), percent change from baseline LDL-C was calculated. Patients were followed for subsequent CV events (composite endpoint 1: MI, ischemic stroke [IS], coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]; composite endpoint 2: MI, IS, CABG, PCI, CV death). Cox models were used to evaluate the association between time-dependent LDL-C percent change and CV events, stratified by baseline LDL-C (&lt;70, 70-99, ≥100 mg/dL). Results: Among 3,034 MI patients identified, 740 (24%), 940 (31%) and 1354 (45%) had a baseline LDL-C &lt;70, 70-99 and ≥100 mg/dL, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, 471 and 667 patients experienced the composite endpoint 1 and 2, respectively. After covariate adjustment, a trend towards a lower risk of CV events with decreasing LDL-C from baseline, compared to those with no change or an increase in LDL-C, was observed among those with a LDL-C &lt;70 and &gt; 100 mg/dl but not in those with a LDL-C 70-99 mg/dL (Table). Conclusions: In a population-based cohort of MI patients, there is evidence that patients with a decrease in LDL-C after MI may have a reduced risk of subsequent CV events. These results underscore the importance of lowering LDL-C after a MI and may help to identify subgroups at highest risk for additional CV events and those who may benefit from targeted LDL-C treatment recommendations.

Rationale and design of two trials assessing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of inclisiran in adolescents with homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Inclisiran is a small interfering RNA molecule that reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. This subcutaneous, twice-yearly administered agent has been shown to effectively and safely lower LDL-C in adult patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, adults at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, as well as in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. With the current, limited treatment options available to reach treatment goals in children with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, or statin intolerance, inclisiran could be a valuable new therapeutic option. The objective of these ongoing studies is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of inclisiran in adolescents diagnosed with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (ORION-13) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (ORION-16). ORION-13 and ORION-16 are both two-part (1-year double-blind inclisiran vs. placebo/1 year open-label inclisiran) multicentre trials including adolescents aged 12 to &lt;18 years diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolaemia. ORION-13 will include ∼12 participants diagnosed with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and ORION-16 will include ∼150 participants diagnosed with heterozygous familial hypercholesteroleamia. The primary endpoint is the percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 330. Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints include changes in other lipid parameters and treatment-emergent adverse events as well as laboratory parameters and vital signs. Exploratory endpoints include individual responsiveness of the participants and change in LDL-C according to the type of underlying causal mutation. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT04659863 (ORION-13) and NCT04652726 (ORION-16).

Effects of Evolocumab Added to Moderate-Intensity Statin Therapy in Chinese Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The EMSIACS Trial Study Protocol

Background: Several studies have demonstrated that using a higher dose of statin can easily induce liver injury and myopathy. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-established modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, the large majority of Chinese patients cannot meet the target level of LDL-C recommended by the Chinese expert consensus. Evolocumab has been demonstrated to reduce LDL-C by approximately 60% in many studies. Nevertheless, whether combined evolocumab and moderate-intensity statin is as effective in lowering LDL-C and decreasing incidence of MACE in Chinese patients presenting with the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains unknown. Therefore, the “Evolocumab added to Moderate-Intensity Statin therapy on LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular adverse events in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome” (EMSIACS) is conducted.Methods: The EMSIACS is a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study involving analyzing the feasibility and efficacy of evolocumab added to moderate-intensity statin therapy on lowering LDL-C levels in adult Chinese patients hospitalized for acute phase ACS. The sample size calculation is based on the primary outcome, and 500 patients will be planned to recruit. Patients are randomized in evolocumab arm (evolocumab 140mg every 2weeks plus rosuvastatin 10mg/day or atorvastatin 20mg/day) and statin-only arm (rosuvastatin 10mg/day or atorvastatin 20mg/day). The primary outcome is the percentage change in LDL-C in weeks 4 and week 12 after treatment. The secondary outcome is the occurrence of MACE after 12weeks and 1year of treatment.Discussion: If the EMSIACS trial endpoints prove statistically significant, the evolocumab added to moderate-intensity statin therapy will have the potential to effectively lower subjects’ LDL-C levels, especially for the Chinese patients with acute phase ACS. However, if the risk of MACE is not significantly different between the two groups, we may extend follow-up time for secondary outcome when the clinical trial is over.Clinical trial registration: The study is registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04100434), which retrospectively registered on November 24, 2020.