The shift from a conventional approach to a more game-based and tacticalapproach when coaching football has placed an increased emphasis on the monitoringof training sessions and has consequently influenced, to a considerable extent, the furtherdevelopments of tools and technology. With the growth of this field of practice, it becameapparent that there is a gap in scientific understanding of the relationship between thecoachs predicted and players perceived training load. The training load that is predictedand perceived by football coaches and players respectively was compared in twenty-twotraining sessions with a semi-professional football team participating in the Maltese PremierLeague during the 2019/20 season. This was done through the session ratings of perceivedexertion (Session RPE) and global positioning system (GPS). The participants consistedof twenty-one players and their coaches (coach and physical trainer). Athletes respondedto the scale of perceived exertion using the BORG scale (scores from 0 to 10) after thetraining sessions, while the coaches completed the scale pre-session (predicted load) andpost session (estimated load). Apart from that, the players were monitored with a PlayertekGPS (10hz) throughout all training sessions. These methods were used to collect both theinternal load (Session RPE) and external load (GPS). There was little disagreement betweenthe predicted and estimated training load (coaches) and that perceived by the playersas high correlations were established. Findings suggest that the coaches predicted andestimated loads strongly correlate with the load as perceived by the football players duringan ongoing season between December 2019 and February 2020. A strong correlation alsoexists between the coaches predicted and estimated loads and the GPS load.
Read full abstract