Perceived Personal Control Research Articles

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the perceived personal control questionnaire as an outcome measure instrument for genetic counseling.

The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire serves as an instrument to assess the concept of PPC, which refers to a person's perception of their ability to achieve positive outcomes while avoiding the negative effects of a given situation. Developed and used as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in genetic counseling, the PPC questionnaire has been translated and validated in several languages, but not in French. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate a French version of the PPC questionnaire to evaluate genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). After the translation into French, cognitive interviews were conducted with nine participants who had attended genetic counseling for HBOC to examine the adequacy of this French version and to verify participants' understanding of the questionnaire items. Cognitive interview data suggested that slight modifications should be made to four of the nine items and that it would be beneficial to add a short introduction to ensure that participants' interpretation corresponded to the intended meaning. Psychometric validation was then conducted with 99 participants who had also attended genetic counseling for HBOC. Counselees completed the questionnaire before and after their genetic consultation. The acceptability of the questionnaire was demonstrated by the presence of few missing items. The original three-factor solution was not confirmed by our exploratory factor analysis, suggesting that the questionnaire should be used as a one-dimensional instrument. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was high, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.89 before genetic counseling and 0.88 after. The significant increase in PPC scores before and after genetic counseling supports the responsiveness of the questionnaire. Convergent validity was confirmed by positive association with counselees' satisfaction with genetic counseling. These properties suggest the French PPC questionnaire is a valuable instrument for use as a PROM in genetic counseling research.

Cardiology clinic patient attitudes toward and potential personal utility of genetic testing: Findings from a unique multiracial clinical sample.

As more is understood about the hereditary nature of disease risk, the utility of genetic testing within cardiovascular medicine is increasingly being explored. Although testing may afford more personalized risk stratification, there is a paucity of information regarding patient knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs toward genetic testing among cardiology patients. Participants (n = 530) recruited primarily from a cardiology clinic filled out a 41‐item written questionnaire assessing knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes toward genetic testing, motivators and detractors for considering genetic testing, and perceived likelihood for behavior change after hypothetical genetic testing risk stratification. Path analysis was used to test the hypothetical models predicting the likelihood of getting a genetic test and making behavior changes following genetic testing. The patient population was late‐middle‐aged (59.0 ± 14.5 years), majority women (61.5%), and about half reported having a bachelor's degree. 58.1% of participants self‐identified as White, 25.7% as African American or Black, 6.8% as Spanish, Latino, or Hispanic, 3.0% as Asian or Pacific Islander, and 0.5% as Native American. Gender (being a woman) and more years of education were related to greater knowledge about genetic testing. Racial identity and years of education were related to beliefs about genetic testing. Beliefs, but not knowledge, were related to more positive attitudes and a higher likelihood of pursuing genetic testing. Positive attitudes were related to greater perceived personal control (PPC). Furthermore, attitudes and PPC were related to higher likelihood of lifestyle change after genetic testing. These results highlight the need to integrate the experiences of racialized communities into education/counseling efforts. Most educational counseling efforts lack a nuanced discussion of social determinants of health or beliefs. In addition to factual information, educational counseling must also address people's beliefs, concerns, and the intersecting experiences and identities, which shape patients' relationships with the evolving landscape of healthcare and personalized medicine.

Abstract PO-049: Genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) increases perceived personal control in Latinas at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

Abstract Introduction: GCRA, which includes genetic counseling and testing, identifies individuals at hereditary cancer risk. Despite recognition of GCRA as standard-of- care, Latinas remain underrepresented in clinics and little is known about their experience. Our study examines the effect of an adapted motivational interviewing (AMI) telephone intervention on GCRA uptake. Perceived personal control (PPC) assesses cognitive, behavioral and decisional locus of control relative to the possibility of having a hereditary condition. Purpose: 1) Evaluate the effect of an AMI intervention on GCRA uptake 2) Explore baseline PPC and how it is affected by GCRA and AMI Procedures: English or Spanish speaking adult Latinas, who met NCCN criteria for BRCA testing were eligible and approached when scheduling their GCRA at two safety-net hospitals and one cancer center. Participants were randomized to an AMI intervention, time-and-attention control health habits (HH), or usual care (UC). The 9-item validated PPC instrument (scored 0-2, no PPC to full PPC) was administered in participants’ preferred language at baseline, pre- and post-GCRA. Results: Of the 478 Latinas who consented, 152 (32%) were randomized to both the AMI and UC arms, and the remaining 174 (36%) assigned to the HH arm. Spanish was the primary language for 76% (n=362). The majority had a history of cancer (79%, n=375) and most (64%, n=241) were undergoing treatment at the time of GCRA. There was no difference in the demographics of each arm (p>0.22). There was no difference in GCRA uptake by arm with 79% (n=379) keeping their appointment. Baseline PPC: PPC scores were not different between the arms for total PPC (AMI = 1.36, HH = 1.36, UC = 1.37; p = 0.67). Domain scores were: cognitive = 1.22, behavioral = 1.32 and decisional = 1.54. Post-GRCA PPC: PPC increased 12% for the cohort and in the arms, with no difference in the magnitude of increase between arms (p>0.68). The greatest increase was observed in cognitive PPC (>17%) across the cohort. In the AMI arm, total PPC increased 11% for those with cancer (p=0.043) and English speakers had an increase of 20% compared to 11% for Spanish speakers. Behavioral PPC increased by 14% in both the AMI and UC arms (p=0.004). Decisional PPC increased 8.9% in the AMI arm (p=0.026). Conclusions: PPC scores increased post-GCRA, with no between-arm differences, suggesting that the shared exposure to GCRA may increase PPC for Latinas. AMI did not impact GCRA uptake, though we did observe an increase in PPC scores in this arm for English speakers and those with cancer. Therefore, the addition of AMI to GCRA may be particularly effective in increasing PPC for some patients. The most significant increases in post-GCRA PPC were observed in cognitive PPC, likely reflecting the educational focus of GCRA but also supports a need for focus on approaches to enhance decisional and behavioral control. This is further supported by our finding that an increase in decisional control was only seen in the AMI arm. This merits further exploration and study. Citation Format: Charité Ricker, Bita Nehoray, Guadalupe M. Carvajal, Kathleen R. Blazer, Sharon Sand, Kimlin Ashing, April Vang, Kai Wang, Nancy Feldman, Jeffrey N. Weitzel. Genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) increases perceived personal control in Latinas at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-049.

Abstract A50: Differences in perceived personal control among Latina women undergoing genetic cancer risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

Abstract Introduction: Genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) is a growing subspecialty that identifies individuals at risk for hereditary predisposition to cancer. Despite recognition of GCRA as a standard-of-care service, there are significant disparities in access to GCRA among at-risk underserved Latina women. Therefore, little is known about the emotional and decisional experience of Latinas undergoing GCRA. Previous studies have looked at the concept of perceived personal control (PPC) as an outcome variable of GCRA, measuring an individual's feelings of control related to the possibility of having a hereditary condition. This study examined PPC among patients participating in a randomized controlled study examining the effect of an adapted motivational interview (AMI) pre-GCRA telephone intervention to promote uptake of GCRA by underserved Latinas. Purpose: To evaluate the influence of the AMI intervention and GCRA on PPC at baseline, immediately pre- and post-GCRA among English and Spanish-speaking Latinas at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Method: Eligible participants were adult women who self-identified as Latina, understood English and/or Spanish, and met NCCN criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing. Participants were randomized to a motivational interview intervention, time and attention control, or usual care. A validated 9-item instrument to assess three dimensions of perceived personal control (behavioral, decisional, and cognitive control) over a genetic problem and the counseling process was translated to Spanish and verbally administered in the patients' preferred language at baseline (prior to randomization) and immediately pre and post-GCRA. A higher PPC score indicates an increased sense of PPC. The three dimensions of PPC encompass a total PPC score. Results: Of the 411 participants, 323 (78.6%) were affected by breast cancer and 88 (21.4%) were unaffected at time of enrollment. Two-hundred and eighty-two (68.6%) were Spanish-speakers and 129 (31.4%) spoke English. While not significant, total PPC scores increased from baseline to post-GCRA and from pre-GCRA to post-GCRA, but decreased from baseline to pre-GCRA for all participants (the affected and unaffected individuals, including English and Spanish-speakers). Unaffected women had significantly higher total PPC scores than women affected with cancer (p=0.001). Unaffected patients had higher cognitive PPC scores at baseline (p=0.008), pre-GCRA (p=0.019), and post-GCRA (p=0.001) compared to the affected participants at all three time points. Unaffected individuals scored higher in behavioral PPC at post-GCRA than the affected participants (p=0.012). The unaffected individuals scored higher in decisional PPC at post-GCRA compared to the affected individuals (p=0.005). There were no significant differences in PPC scores between English and Spanish-speaking participants or between study arms. Conclusion: Cognitive, decisional, behavioral, and total PPC scores were highest at post-GCRA among all groups (unaffected and affected individuals, and English and Spanish-speakers). Unaffected individuals had higher cognitive PPC scores at all three times points compared to affected participants. Interestingly, the affected participants scored higher in behavioral PPC at baseline, but scored lower post-GCRA compared to those who are unaffected. This suggests that after receiving information during GCRA, the unaffected individuals may believe that they have more control over their health and opportunities for cancer prevention. Decrease in total PPC from baseline to pre-GCRA may be associated with pre-counseling anxiety. More investigation into the three dimensions of PPC should be conducted in order to better understand their distinctions and relationship to GCRA. Citation Format: Tanya A. Chavez, Bita Nehoray, Charité Ricker, Kathleen R. Blazer, Sharon Sand, Kimlin T. Ashing, Jaime Cordova, Gwen Uman, Kai Yang, Nancy Feldman, Jeffrey N. Weitzel. Differences in perceived personal control among Latina women undergoing genetic cancer risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr A50.

Clients' Perception of Outcome of Team-Based Prenatal and Reproductive Genetic Counseling in Serbian Service Using the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) Questionnaire.

This is the first study in Serbia and the region of South-East Europe dedicated to clients' perception of outcome and efficiency of prenatal and reproductive genetic counseling. The primary aim of this study was to assess overall value and success of genetic counseling in prenatal and reproductive care with regard to perceived personal control of clients, reflecting also in a part patient comprehension, knowledge retention, and empowerment in decision-making. The standardized Perceived Personal Control questionnaire (PPC) was used for the assessment of 239 female participants. First, we performed a complete validation of the psychometric characteristics of the Serbian-language version of the PPC questionnaire. The validation of the questionnaire permits other researchers from Serbian-speaking regions of South-East Europe to use this standard instrument to assess the effectiveness of prenatal genetic counseling in their communities and analyze advantages and disadvantages of their counseling models. We also measured social and demographic characteristics of participants. Further, we analyzed effects of our team-based prenatal and reproductive genetic counseling model through (a) calculation of PPC scores at three different stages (before initial, after initial, and before second counseling session), and (b) by assessing participants' responses by indication for referral (advanced maternal age, abnormal biochemical screening, family history of hereditary disorders, maternal exposure to drugs, exposure to radiation, exposure to infective agents, infertility or recurrent abortions, and miscellaneous). The results indicate that participants' knowledge after initial counseling increased significantly and after that remained stable and sustainable. A satisfactory level of confidence among participants had been achieved, in that many felt an increased sense of control over their situation and emotional response to it. Indirectly, these results indicate the success of a team-based prenatal genetic counseling model, which has not been assessed in the literature to date.

Disclosing genetic risk for coronary heart disease: effects on perceived personal control and genetic counseling satisfaction.

We investigated whether disclosure of coronary heart disease (CHD) genetic risk influences perceived personal control (PPC) and genetic counseling satisfaction (GCS). Participants (n = 207, age: 45-65 years) were randomized to receive estimated 10-year risk of CHD based on a conventional risk score (CRS) with or without a genetic risk score (GRS). Risk estimates were disclosed by a genetic counselor who also reviewed how GRS altered risk in those randomized to CRS+GRS. Each participant subsequently met with a physician and then completed surveys to assess PPC and GCS. Participants who received CRS+GRS had higher PPC than those who received CRS alone although the absolute difference was small (25.2 ± 2.7 vs 24.1 ± 3.8, p = 0.04). A greater proportion of CRS+GRS participants had higher GCS scores (17.3 ± 5.3 vs 15.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.06). In the CRS+GRS group, PPC and GCS scores were not correlated with GRS. Within both groups, PPC and GCS scores were similar in patients with or without family history (p = NS). In conclusion, patients who received their genetic risk of CHD had higher PPC and tended to have higher GCS. Our findings suggest that disclosure of genetic risk of CHD together with conventional risk estimates is appreciated by patients. Whether this results in improved outcomes needs additional investigation.

Abstract 20188: The Effect of Disclosing Genetic Risk for Coronary Heart Disease on Perceived Personal Control and Genetic Counseling Satisfaction: The MI-GENES Study

Background: Perceived personal control (PPC) represents the belief that a person can alter his/her own situation or state. Higher PPC has been associated with increased health-related quality of life and helps facilitate healthy behavioral changes. We investigated whether disclosure of coronary heart disease (CHD) genetic risk influences PPC and genetic counseling satisfaction (GCS) in the myocardial infarction genes (MI-GENES) study, a randomized controlled trial of disclosing genetic risk of CHD. Methods: Participants (40-65 year-old, at intermediate 10-year CHD risk, and not on statins) were randomized to receive estimated 10-year risk of CHD based on their Framingham Risk Score (FRS) or FRS plus a 28 SNP genetic risk score (FRS*GRS). CHD risk was disclosed in each arm by a genetic counselor during a 30-minute scripted session that included a discussion of the impact of family history on CHD risk. For FRS*GRS participants, the genetic counselor also reviewed how their genetic risk score altered their FRS. Each participant then met with a physician to engage in shared-decision making regarding the need for statin therapy. Afterwards, study participants were asked to complete validated surveys to assess PPC and GCS. The 9-item PPC questionnaire was scored 0-9, with higher scores indicating greater control beliefs. The 5-item GCS questionnaire was scored 0-10, with greater scores indicating greater satisfaction with the disclosure session. Results: 207 patients (mean age 58.8±5 years, 46.7% males) were randomized to receive either FRS or FRS*GRS. Patients randomized to receive FRS*GRS had higher PPC compared to FRS although the absolute difference was small (8.85±0.77 vs. 8.54±1.31, P=0.016). Patients randomized to receive FRS*GRS also had a higher GCS score than FRS patients (9.08±2.67 vs. 8.3±3.67, P=0.050]. Conclusions: Disclosure of genetic risk for CHD did not adversely affect PPC or GCS. In fact, patients who received CHD genetic risk information had higher PPC and GCS. Our findings suggest that disclosure of CHD genetic risk is appreciated by patients and may empower them to improve health-related behaviors.

Deaf Genetic Testing and Psychological Well‐Being in Deaf Adults

Limited data suggest that enhanced self-knowledge from genetic information related to non-medical traits can have a positive impact on psychological well-being. Deaf individuals undertake genetic testing for deaf genes to increase self-knowledge. Because deafness is considered a non-medical trait by many individuals, we hypothesized that deaf individuals receiving a genetic explanation for why they are deaf will experience increased psychological well-being. We report results from a prospective, longitudinal study to determine the impact of genetic testing (GJB2, Cx26; GJB6, Cx30) on perceived personal control (PPC), anxiety, and depression in deaf adults (N = 209) assessed following pre-test genetic counseling as well as 1-month and 6-months following test result disclosure. Participants were classified as Cx positive (n = 82) or Cx negative/inconclusive (n = 127). There was significant evidence for Cx group differences in PPC and anxiety over time (PPC: Cx group*time interaction p = 0.0007; anxiety: Cx group*time interaction p = 0.002), where PPC scores were significantly higher, and anxiety scores were significantly lower for the Cx positive group relative to the negative/inconclusive group following test result disclosure. Compared to pre-test, PPC scores increased at 1-month (p = 0.07) and anxiety scores decreased at 6-months (p = 0.03) for the Cx positive group. In contrast, PPC scores decreased (p = 0.009, p < 0.0001) and anxiety scores increased (p = 0.09, p = 0.02) for the Cx negative/inconclusive group at 1- and 6-months post test result disclosure. Genetic testing for deaf genes affects the psychological well-being of deaf individuals. Increasing deaf adults' access to genetic testing may potentially enhance self-knowledge and increase psychological well-being for those who receive a genetic explanation, which could offer downstream health benefits.

The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire: Reliability and validity in a sample from the United Kingdom

Outcome measures are important assessment tools to evaluate clinical genetics services. Research suggests that perceived personal control (PPC) is an outcome valued by clinical genetics patients and clinicians. The PPC scale was developed in Hebrew to capture three dimensions of PPC: Cognitive, decisional, and behavioral control. This article reports on the first psychometric validation of the English translation of the PPC scale. Previous research has shown that the Hebrew and Dutch translations have good psychometric properties. However, the psychometric properties of the English translation have not been tested, and there is disagreement about the factor structure, with implications for how to score the measure. A total of 395 patients attending a clinical genetics appointment in the United Kingdom completed several measures at baseline, and a further 241 also completed measures at 2-4 weeks follow-up. The English language PPC has (a) a one-factor structure, (b) convergent validity with internal health locus of control (IHLC), satisfaction with life (SWL), depression, and authenticity, (c) high internal consistency (α = 0.83), and (d) sensitivity to change, being able to identify moderate changes in PPC following clinic attendance (Cohen's d = 0.40). These properties suggest the English language PPC measure is a useful tool for both clinical genetics research and for use as a Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) in service evaluation.

Patient Empowerment in Clinical Genetics Services

Outcome measurement in clinical genetics is problematic because the patient benefits are difficult to measure. The aim in this qualitative grounded theory study was to develop a theoretical framework describing the patient benefits from using clinical genetics services. Seven focus groups and 19 interviews were conducted with patients, patient group representatives, and health professionals. Data analysis resulted in construction of a model of empowerment summarizing the patient benefits from using clinical genetics services. Empowerment is similar to the concept of perceived personal control (PPC), and a measure of PPC has been developed for use in evaluations of clinical genetics services. However, empowerment includes some benefits not captured by PPC related to empowerment of other at risk relatives, and future generations.

A comparison of counselee and counselor satisfaction in reproductive genetic counseling

Important insights in the process of genetic counseling can be provided by establishing levels of satisfaction. The aim of our study was to compare counselees' and counselors' satisfaction with the initial consultation in reproductive genetic counseling and to gain insight into the factors associated with their contentment. One hundred and fifty-one women and 11 counselors participated in this study. Pre-test questionnaires included counselees' socio-demographic, physical and psychological characteristics, i.e. their degree of worry, expectations, preferred participation in decision making and experienced degree of control. Post-visit questionnaires asked for counselees' and counselors' satisfaction, counselees' participation in decision making and counselees' Perceived Personal Control (PPC). Little difference was found between counselees' and counselors' overall visit-specific satisfaction (mean 79 vs 74, respectively, on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100). The correlation between counselees' and counselors' satisfaction was medium sized (r = 0.26, p < 0.01). Counselees' satisfaction was positively associated with being pregnant and with their post-visit PPC. Counselors' satisfaction was positively associated with counselees' post-visit PPC. No other counselee and counselor related variables appeared to be associated with satisfaction, nor was the duration of the consultation. Our findings suggest that, although both groups were satisfied with the consultation, counselees and counselors do not always have equal perceptions of the consultation process and may form their evaluation in different ways. In the assessment of quality of care, evaluation of both counselees' and counselors' satisfaction deserves more attention.

The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: Reliability and validity of the instrument

The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire was developed by Berkenstadt and colleagues as an outcome measure for the evaluation of the process of genetic counseling. The present study aimed to further assess the psychometric properties of a Dutch version of the instrument. Data were used from two samples. A reproductive genetic counseling sample (n = 140), which included pregnant and non-pregnant women, and a cancer genetic counseling sample (n = 181), also consisting of women only. Counselees completed questionnaires before and following their first consultation. Besides the PPC these questionnaires addressed counselees' degree of concern, risk perception and satisfaction with the consultation. The following psychometric properties were assessed: acceptability, internal consistency, dimensionality, and validity. The instrument was well accepted as indicated by few missing items. The internal consistency was good for the total PPC (Cronbach's alpha: 0.79-0.81), reasonable for the original subscales of 'decisional' and 'behavioral control' (>0.60), but unacceptable for the subscale of 'cognitive control' (<0.60). The original three-factor solution was not confirmed; a one-factor solution proved most stable. Significant differences between pre- and post-counseling PPC scores support the PPC's construct validity. Concurrent validity was confirmed by positive associations with counselees' satisfaction although non-significant (concern) and unexpected (risk perception) results were also found. When used as a one-dimensional scale, the PPC has its value as an outcome measure in research addressing genetic counseling. However, the instrument's validity needs to be further assessed.

Initial cancer genetic counseling consultation: Change in counselees' cognitions and anxiety, and association with addressing their needs and preferences

The fulfillment of counselees' expectations in cancer genetic counseling and how this affects the outcome of counseling have received little attention so far. This study investigates how the initial consultation influences counselees' cognitions and anxiety, whether counselors address counselees' prior needs and preferences during the visit, and whether addressing needs is associated with a more positive outcome of the visit. One hundred twenty-eight affected and unaffected counselees from families with no known mutation, who were seen by one of fourteen counselors, participated. Pre- and post-visit questionnaires assessed correct knowledge about hereditary breast or colon cancer, perceived personal control (PPC), anxiety (STAI), risk perceptions, and (fulfillment of) needs (QUOTE-gene(ca)). Results demonstrated a pre- to post-visit significant increase in correct knowledge and PPC, and a significant decrease in STAI and risk perceptions. However, marked overestimation of risks persisted. Decrease in STAI and risk perceptions was significantly less pronounced in affected versus unaffected counselees. The majority of counselees were (very) satisfied about the extent to which their needs were addressed, albeit about one-fifth were not regarding emotional matters and explanations about their own cancer risk. Finally, the better counselees perceived their needs to be fulfilled, the significantly higher their PPC and the significantly lower their STAi scores were. Findings suggest that both unaffected and affected counselees should be counseled carefully. Also, a more effective service may be attained if counselors pay more attention to counselees' emotional needs and detail more inheritance and penetrance of mutated genes in relation to counselees' family history.

Evaluating Genetic Counseling: Client Expectations, Psychological Adjustment and Satisfaction with Service

Periodic evaluations of genetic counseling services are useful for determining the effectiveness of counseling in meetings its psycho-educational aims, as well as identifying where improvements to the service may be made. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic counseling services provided by Genetic Services of Western Australia (GSWA) to determine the impact of counseling on client expectations, satisfaction with the service, and psychological adjustment, defined as wellbeing and perceived personal control (PPC). A total of 122 clients participated in a self-administered survey conducted pre- and post-counseling. Client expectations of the service as a means of providing information were met, and opportunities for counselors to meet client's expectations of psychological support were identified. Furthermore, counseling was found to maintain and enhance psychological wellbeing of clients. The role of counseling in facilitating the development of PPC was a key contributor to a high sense of satisfaction in clients.

CHANGES IN THE POLICIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEMATOLOGY, 1982-1998, DESIGNED TO PROMOTE THE MENTAL HEALTH OF CHILDREN WITH LEUKEMIA AND ENHANCE THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE

A perceived personal control (PPC) preventive intervention model that had earlier received empirical and theoretical verification was applied to a population of pediatric leukemia patients to promote their mental health and enhance their quality of life. The PPC model entails intervention on two complementary levels. On the personal interaction level, preventive intervention is administered by a network of natural and organized support systems, while the social action level leads to the introduction of changes in policies, structures, allocation of resources, and services. Preventive intervention in both domains is discussed with respect to changes in policies introduced between 1982 and 1998 in the hematology department of Rambam Medical Center in Haifa, Israel, as well as in other relevant departments catering to children with leukemia, to foster the positive mental health of these children.

Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling.

Many researchers have tried to establish criteria for the evaluation of genetic counseling and the assessment of its success. Most studies focused on counseling outcomes mainly educational and reproductive variables. In the present study we introduced the concept of "perceived personal control" (PPC), which captures a wider and more meaningful range of effects of genetic counseling. It was found to be central to coping with health threats and to adapting to a broad spectrum of health problems. This study investigated 154 counseling cases. Counselees were requested to complete pre- and post-counseling questionnaires consisting of a knowledge test, measures of PPC, expectations/evaluations of counseling, and satisfaction with the procedure. Comparisons of mean PPC scores before and after counseling showed significant increases. Higher post-counseling PPC was found among counselees who had been given a definite diagnosis, a specific recurrence risk, and been offered prenatal diagnosis. Post-counseling PPC also correlated with knowledge, satisfaction, counseling evaluations, and expectation fulfillment. The findings suggest that PPC is a valid measure for the evaluation of genetic counseling outcomes. The psychometrically reliable scales developed in this study can become helpful tools for assessing genetic counseling both in research and in clinical practice, helping the counselor evaluate the counseling session and focus on the counselees' needs.

Perceived personal control (PPC): A new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling

Perceived personal control (PPC): A new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling

The Role of Perceived Control, Attributions, and Meaning in Members of Infertile Couples' Well-Being

The Role of Perceived Control, Attributions, and Meaning in Members of Infertile Couples' Well-BeingAntonia Abbey and L. Jill HalmanAntonia AbbeySearch for more papers by this author and L. Jill HalmanWayne State University and Instititute for Social ResearchSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:January 2011https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1995.14.3.271PDFPDF PLUS ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations About Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Cited byCited by1. “I think you understand me.” Studying the associations between actual, assumed, and perceived understanding within couplesOnline publication date: 5 September 2019. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar2. Whose fault is it? Blame predicting psychological adjustment and couple satisfaction in couples seeking fertility treatmentOnline publication date: 9 February 2017. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar3. Perceived control over the medical procedure and its association with adjustment to a low-control situation: the case of infertilityOnline publication date: 30 December 2015. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar4. Comparison of Self-esteem in Fertile and Infertile WomenOnline publication date: 1 October 2014. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar5. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of men’s and women’s coping strategy selection during early IVF treatmentOnline publication date: 20 June 2014. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar6. Managing multiple goals during fertility treatment: An interpretative phenomenological analysisOnline publication date: 15 February 2013. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar7. Perception of control, coping and psychological stress of infertile women undergoing IVFOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar8. What does having a fertility problem mean to couples?Online publication date: 15 October 2009. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar9. Women's and men's perceptions of infertility and their associations with psychological adjustment: A dyadic approachOnline publication date: 10 January 2011. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar10. Infertility and moral luck: The politics of women blaming themselves for infertilityOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar11. Predicting Emotional Response to Unsuccessful Fertility Treatment: A Prospective StudyOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar12. Gender Differences and Dynamics Shaping the Adoption Life Cycle: Review of the Literature and Recommendations.Online publication date: 1 January 2005. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar13. Correlates of Levels and Patterns of Positive Life Changes Following Sexual Assault.Online publication date: 1 January 2004. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar14. Investigation of the benefits of HIV/AIDS caregiving and relations among caregiving adjustment, benefit finding, and stress and coping variablesOnline publication date: 12 May 2010. Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarSue Hall, David P. French and Theresa M. Marteau15. Causal Attributions Following Serious Unexpected Negative Events: A Systematic ReviewOnline publication date: 1 June 2005. Go to citation Crossref 16. Distress of infertile males after fertility workupOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar17. Psychosocial aspects of selected issues in women's reproductive health: Current status and future directions.Online publication date: 1 January 2002. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar18. Coping With Academic Problems: An Empirical Examination of Brickman et al.'s Models of Helping and Coping1Online publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar19. The Interrelationship Between Coping Strategies and Sexual Functioning in In Vitro Fertilization PatientsOnline publication date: 2 February 2011. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar20. A meta-analytic review of coping with illnessOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar21. When Bad Things Turn Good and Good Things Turn Bad: Sequences of Redemption and Contamination in Life Narrative and their Relation to Psychosocial Adaptation in Midlife Adults and in StudentsOnline publication date: 2 July 2016. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar22. Why do infertile males use psychological couple counselling?Online publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar23. Positive by-products of the struggle with chemical dependencyOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar24. Online publication date: Go to citation Crossref 25. Online publication date: Go to citation Crossref 26. Langfristige psychische Folgen von Kinderlosigkeit: Eine ÜbersichtOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar27. Perceived personal control (PPC): A new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counselingOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar28. Perceived personal control (PPC): A new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counselingOnline publication date: 29 January 1999. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar29. Personality and Transformation in me Face of AdversityOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar30. Infertility and psychological distress: A critical review of the literatureOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar31. Toward Greater Understanding of the Psychological Effects of Infertility on WomenOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar32. Construing Benefits from Adversity: Adaptotional Significance and Disposltional UnderpinningsOnline publication date: Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar Volume 14Issue 3Sep 1995 Information© 1995 Guilford Publications Inc.PDF download