Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy In Patients Research Articles

177 Lu-DOTATATE Salvage Therapy in Rapidly Progressing Neuroendocrine Tumor With Poor Performance Status.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown to be effective and safe in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic and nongastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, the selection criteria for PRRT are restricted to patients with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≤2 or Karnofsky performance score ≥60). This denies many patients with adequate somatostatin receptor expression and biochemical profiles from the beneficial effects of PRRT on the quality of life, daily function, and overall survival. The 2 cases highlight the favorable response of PRRT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor having a very poor performance status initially.

Evaluation of Hepatotoxicity from Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and a Very High Liver Tumor Burden.

The aim of the current study was to describe the risk of hepatotoxicity for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with a very high liver tumor burden, defined as tumor involving more than 75% of the liver. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 371 patients who received at least 1 cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE at Mayo Clinic for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We identified 15 total patients with more than 75% liver involvement on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and with either a contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI or dual-phase abdominal CT examination. Results: Of the 15 patients with more than 75% liver involvement, 1 experienced hepatotoxicity (i.e., worsening liver enzymes or bilirubin) as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. No patients had grade 3-5 hepatotoxicity (i.e., clinical signs of liver failure). Conclusion: When considering the risk of liver injury from PRRT due to burden of disease, our data suggest that PRRT may be a safe option in patients with more than 75% liver involvement. Future efforts should be made to determine the safety profile of PRRT in patients with varying degrees of liver involvement.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients With Advanced Progressive Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Survival Predictors.

Progressive metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is often characterized by rapid disease progression and poor prognosis, with only few therapeutic options available. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has demonstrated remarkable success in the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and has also been suggested to treat MTC. However, evidence on its effectiveness and long-term outcome for this indication is still limited. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PRRT in patients with advanced, progressive MTC and to determine survival. Potential predictors of survival were also evaluated. From September 2003 to June 2019, 28 patients (15 men and 13 women; mean age, 49 ± 14 years) with progressive, somatostatin receptor-positive advanced MTC received PRRT with 177Lu- or 90Y-labeled somatostatin analogs at Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Germany. Toxicity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Treatment response was evaluated according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1, as well as molecular imaging criteria (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), defined from the start of PRRT. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify parameters associated with PFS and OS. Seventy-seven cycles of PRRT were administered (mean cumulative administered activity, 16.0 ± 7.8 GBq). No acute or long-term grade 3/4 toxicity was recorded with a follow-up of 3 to 140 months, except for 1 patient (4%) who suffered from grade 3 anemia (possibly related to disease progression). According to the RECIST criteria, the disease control rate after 3 to 4 months of PRRT was 56% (partial remission, 12%; stable disease, 44%). The disease control rate (72%) was higher by molecular response evaluation. Median OS and PFS were 63.7 and 10.1 months, respectively. The annual OS rates were 84% at 1 year, 65% at 3 years, 57% at 5 years, and 18% at 10 years. The annual PFS rates were 42% at 1 year, 21% at 2 years, and 13% at 5 years. Patients with bone metastases had poorer OS and PFS than those without metastases (median OS, 58.7 vs 92.3 months [P = 0.035; hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-7.84]; median PFS, 8.5 vs 12.8 months [P = 0.592; hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-2.76]). Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy was well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced, aggressive MTC. Bone metastasis was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS.

Comparison of [18F]DOPA and [68Ga]DOTA-TOC as a PET imaging tracer before peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

BackgroundIn treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), confirmation of somatostatin receptor expression with 68Ga-DOTA somatostatin analogues is mandatory to determine eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). [18F]DOPA can detect additional lesions compared to [68Ga]DOTA-TOC. The aim of this study was to explore differences in tumour detection of both tracers and their relevance for selecting patients for PRRT. We retrospectively studied eight patients with NENs who underwent both [68Ga]DOTA-TOC and carbidopa-enhanced [18F]DOPA PET/CT, before first-time PRRT with [177Lu]DOTA-TATE. Tracer order was influenced due to stock availability or to detect suspected metastases with a second tracer. On CT, disease control was defined as a lesion showing complete response, partial response, or stable disease, according to RECIST 1.1. criteria.ResultsSeven patients with in total 89 lesions completed four infusions of 7.4 GBq [177Lu]DOTA-TATE, one patient received only two cycles. Before treatment, [18F]DOPA PET/CT detected significantly more lesions than [68Ga]DOTA-TOC PET/CT (79 vs. 62, p < .001). After treatment, no difference in number of lesions with disease control was found for [18F]DOPA-only (5/27) and [68Ga]DOTA-TOC-only lesions (4/10, p = .25). [18F]DOPA detected more liver metastases (24/27) compared to [68Ga]DOTA-TOC (7/10, p = .006). Six patients showed inpatient heterogeneity in treatment response between [18F]DOPA-only and [68Ga]DOTA-TOC-only lesions.ConclusionsResponse to PRRT with [177Lu]DOTA-TATE was comparable for both [68Ga]DOTA-TOC- and [18F]DOPA-only NEN lesions. [18F]DOPA may be capable of predicting response to PRRT while finding more lesions compared to [68Ga]DOTA-TOC, although these additional lesions are often small of size and undetected by diagnostic CT.

Long-Term Outcomes of Submaximal Activities of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients.

In the literature, up to 45% of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients who are treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) do not receive the intended cumulative activity of 29.6 GBq (800 mCi). The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of submaximal activities of PRRT in patients who discontinued treatment for non-disease-related reasons. Methods: We retrospectively included patients with well-differentiated and advanced NETs who underwent PRRT from 2000 until 2019 and did not receive 29.6 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE. For comparison, we selected control NET patients who received the intended cumulative activity of 29.6 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE between 2000 and 2012. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response, and the secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 243 patients received 3.7-27.8 GBq. In 130 patients, the submaximal activity was unrelated to disease (e.g., bone marrow and renal toxicity in 48% and maximal renal absorbed dose in 23%), and they were included. Patients receiving a reduced activity had more bone metastases, a lower body mass index and albumin level, a higher alkaline phosphatase level, and fewer grade 1 tumors than the 350 patients included in the control group. The disease control rate in the reduced-activity group was 85%, compared with 93% for the control group (P = 0.011). The median PFS (95% CI) was 23 mo (range, 21-26 mo) for the reduced-activity group and 31 mo (range, 27-35 mo) for the control group (P = 0.001), and the median OS (95% CI) was 34 mo (range, 28-40 mo) and 60 mo (range, 53-67 mo), respectively (P < 0.0001). With adjustment for relevant confounders in the multivariable Cox regression analyses, cumulative activity was an independent predictor of both PFS and OS. Conclusion: In NET patients treated with a cumulative activity of less than 29.6 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE, PRRT was less efficacious in tumor response and survival than in patients who received 29.6 GBq.

Association of Upfront Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy With Progression-Free Survival Among Patients With Enteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Data about the optimal timing for the initiation of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for advanced, well-differentiated enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are lacking. To evaluate the association of upfront PRRT vs upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy with progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with advanced enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who experienced disease progression after treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSAs). This retrospective, multicenter cohort study analyzed the clinical records from 25 Italian oncology centers for patients aged 18 years or older who had unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, well-differentiated, grades 1 to 3 enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and received either PRRT or chemotherapy or targeted therapy after experiencing disease progression after treatment with SSAs between January 24, 2000, and July 1, 2020. Propensity score matching was done to minimize the selection bias. Upfront PRRT or upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy. The main outcome was the difference in PFS among patients who received upfront PRRT vs among those who received upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy. A secondary outcome was the difference in overall survival between these groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) were fitted in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model to adjust for relevant factors associated with PFS and were corrected for interaction with these factors. Of 508 evaluated patients (mean ([SD] age, 55.7 [0.5] years; 278 [54.7%] were male), 329 (64.8%) received upfront PRRT and 179 (35.2%) received upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy. The matched group included 222 patients (124 [55.9%] male; mean [SD] age, 56.1 [0.8] years), with 111 in each treatment group. Median PFS was longer in the PRRT group than in the chemotherapy or targeted therapy group in the unmatched (2.5 years [95% CI, 2.3-3.0 years] vs 0.7 years [95% CI, 0.5-1.0 years]; HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.28-0.44; P < .001]) and matched (2.2 years [95% CI, 1.8-2.8 years] vs 0.6 years [95% CI, 0.4-1.0 years]; HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.27-0.51; P < .001]) populations. No significant differences were shown in median overall survival between the PRRT and chemotherapy or targeted therapy groups in the unmatched (12.0 years [95% CI, 10.7-14.1 years] vs 11.6 years [95% CI, 9.1-13.4 years]; HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.62-1.06; P = .11]) and matched (12.2 years [95% CI, 9.1-14.2 years] vs 11.5 years [95% CI, 9.2-17.9 years]; HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.56-1.24; P = .36]) populations. The use of upfront PRRT was independently associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.26-0.51; P < .001) in multivariable analysis. After adjustment of values for interaction, upfront PRRT was associated with longer PFS regardless of tumor functional status (functioning: adjusted HR [aHR], 0.39 [95% CI, 0.27-0.57]; nonfunctioning: aHR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.16-0.56]), grade of 1 to 2 (grade 1: aHR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.12-0.34]; grade 2: aHR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.29-0.73]), and site of tumor origin (pancreatic: aHR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.24-0.61]; intestinal: aHR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.11-0.43]) (P < .001 for all). Conversely, the advantage was not retained in grade 3 tumors (aHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-1.37; P = .13) or in tumors with a Ki-67 proliferation index greater than 10% (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.29-1.43; P = .31). In this cohort study, treatment with upfront PRRT in patients with enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who had experienced disease progression with SSA treatment was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes compared with upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Further research is needed to investigate the correct strategy, timing, and optimal specific sequence of these therapeutic options.

Challenges in Von Hippel-Lindau's disease: PRRT in patients on hemodialysis.

SummaryVon Hippel–Lindau’s disease (VHL) is a hereditary tumor syndrome characterized by its prototype lesions, hemangioblastomas, and renal cell carcinomas. Treatment for renal cell carcinomas can ultimately result in long-term dialysis. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) can also occur in the course of the disease. Currently, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is the standard treatment for progressive neuroendocrine tumors. However, little is known about treatment with PRRT in patients on dialysis, an infrequent presentation in patients with VHL. We present a 72-year-old man with VHL on hemodialysis and a progressive pNET. He received four cycles of PRRT with a reduced dose. Only mild thrombopenia was seen during treatments. The patient died 9 months after the last PRRT because of acute bleeding in a hemangioblastoma. Hemodialysis is not a limiting factor for PRRT treatment and it should be considered as it seems a safe short-term treatment option for this specific group.Learning pointsVon Hippel–Lindau disease (VHL) is a complex disease in which former interventions can limit optimal treatment for following VHL-related tumors later in life.Metastasized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors occur as part of VHL disease.Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy seems a safe short-term treatment option in patients on hemodialysis.

Abstract CT254: COMPETE Phase III Trial - Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-Edotreotide vs. Everolimus in Progressive GEP-NET

Abstract Background Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) make up 75% of all NETs and are often diagnosed at an advanced state with only limited treatment options. Current standard therapies include somatostatin (SST) analogues and targeted drugs such as mTOR inhibitor Everolimus. While these treatments may achieve disease stabilization for a limited time, they rarely induce objective tumor remission. PRRT has recently emerged as a promising option providing more durable responses and potentially higher objective response rates. It uses radiolabeled SST analogues which specifically target and destroy tumor cells, this way significantly sparing benign tissues. PRRT with radiolabeled SST receptor (SSTR)-ligands, such as 177Lu-DOTATATE in NETTER-1, has shown promising results in the subgroup of progressive midgut NET, with significantly improved median progression-free survival (mPFS). 177Lu-Edotreotide is an innovative radiolabeled SST analogue, with a favourable safety profile and promising efficacy. Retrospective data in metastasized GEP-NET demonstrated a mPFS of 34.5 months. A prospective study of PRRT with an approved comparator has not yet been performed. Here we report the trial design and study objectives comparing the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-Edotreotide with Everolimus. Methods Trial design COMPETE (NCT03049189) is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-center Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-Edotreotide PRRT compared to Everolimus in patients with inoperable, progressive, SSTR+ GEP-NET. 300 patients with progressive Grade 1 and 2 GEP-NET will be randomized: 200 will receive a maximum of 4 cycles of 177Lu-Edotreotide (7.5 GBq/cycle) every 3 months or until diagnosis of progression; 100 will receive 10 mg Everolimus daily for 24 months, or until diagnosis of progression. Study treatment duration/patient is 24 months. Study Objectives Primary objective is to demonstrate prolonged mPFS in patients in the 177Lu-Edotreotide arm, vs. Everolimus. Secondary objectives include safety, objective response rates and overall survival after treatment with 177Lu-Edotreotide, vs. Everolimus. Conclusion COMPETE is the first pivotal study to compare PRRT in patients with Grade 1 and 2 GEP-NET using a comparator with an approved therapeutic. It is expected that COMPETE will increase their treatment options, including 1st-line therapy. Further studies with 177Lu-Edotreotide in NET patients with high unmet medical need are under review. Citation Format: Mona M. Wahba, Jonathan Strosberg, Anca Avram, Carina Mari Aparici. COMPETE Phase III Trial - Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-Edotreotide vs. Everolimus in Progressive GEP-NET [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT254.

Salvage peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment option in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, salvage PRRT has been introduced for progressing NET patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the therapeutic efficacy, survival, and toxicity of salvage PRRT in patients with progressive NETs. A systematic (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus) were performed. To determine therapeutic efficacy, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were identified using radiologic response criteria. To determine survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were verified. To determine toxicity, information was collected on serious (grades 3 or 4) hematologic and renal adverse events. Nine articles featuring 426 patients were included in this study. Salvage PRRT achieved pooled proportions of ORR in 17.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6-23.5] and DCR in 76.9% (95% CI 72.3-81.0) of patients. Salvage PRRT demonstrated pooled estimates of PFS of 14.1 months (95% CI 12.2-15.9) and OS of 26.8 months (95% CI 18.8-34.9). Pooled proportions of hematologic and renal toxicities were 10.8% (95% CI 5.9-16.8) and 0.7% (95% CI 0.2-1.8), respectively. A subgroup direct comparison study with initial PRRT revealed that salvage PRRT showed significantly lower therapeutic efficacy (ORR and DCR, all P < 0.001) and shorter PFS (P = 0.03) despite similar hematologic toxicity (P = 0.25) and renal toxicity (P = 0.45). Salvage PRRT is effective in patients with progressive NETs, and toxicity appeared to be similar to initial PRRT which could be a feasible treatment option.

Efficacy and tolerability of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in advanced metastatic bronchial neuroendocrine tumours (NETs)

IntroductionPeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been proven to be effective in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) using 90Yttrium (90Y)- or 177Lutetium (177Lu)-based somatostatin peptides, with 177Lu-DOTATATE recently licensed. There is less published evidence of PRRT in metastatic bronchial NETs. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and toxicity of PRRT in patients with bronchial NETs, to expand the evidence base in this rare type of tumour. Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of all patients with moderate to well-differentiated typical or atypical bronchial NETs treated at the Royal Free Hospital Nuclear Medicine Department with at least two cycles of 90Y-DOTA−OCTREOTATE and/or 177Lu-DOTA−OCTREOTATE between 2009 and 2020. Response rates, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival and toxicity were evaluated. Factors associated with treatment response were evaluated. ResultsOf the 25 patients with bronchial NETs treated with PRRT in our department between 2009–2020, 7 (28 %) had 90Y-DOTATATE and 18 (72 %) had 177Lu-DOTATATE. 44 % of patients had PRRT as third, fourth of fifth line treatment. 72 % of patients had liver metastases and 76 % skeletal metastases at baseline. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months (177Lu-DOTATATE = 18 months; 90Y-DOTATATE = 12 months) and the median overall survival was 42 months. High proliferation rate (ki-67 > 20) and low somatostatin receptor (SSR) uptake (score of 2) were associated with shorter PFS. ConclusionPRRT appears to be a safe treatment in somatostatin receptor positive bronchial NETs, even in patients who have been heavily pre-treated. The efficacy of PRRT is comparable with if not favourable to other systemic therapeutic options.

Australian experience of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in lung neuroendocrine tumours.

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an approved treatment modality for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs), Although Phase III randomised clinical trial data is not available for NETs of other site of origin, in practice, PRRT is used more widely in clinical practice, based on its mechanism of targeting the somatostatin receptor. Use of PRRT for lung (bronchial) NET, specifically typical and atypical carcinoid (TC, AC), has been reported only in small retrospective case series. This multicentre study adds to the evidence regarding utility of PRRT for lung NETs.Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with TC and AC who received 177Lu-dotatate PRRT between January 2002 and June 2019 in six hospitals across Australia was undertaken. Data regarding demographics, efficacy and toxicity was evaluated at each site by the treating clinician.Results: Forty-eight patients (32 AC, 15 TC, 1 unclassified) received a median of four 177Lu-dotatate treatments. There was a median of one prior line of systemic treatment (range: 0–3). The response rate to 177Lu-dotatate was 33%, with a median overall survival of 49 months (range of 3–91), at a median follow up of 33 months. This compares favourably with GEP NET. Overall toxicity was recorded as modest.Conclusions: 177Lu-dotatate PRRT in patients with lung NETs is used in real world practice, where it appears well-tolerated with some efficacy. Further evidence could be obtained through a global prospective clinical or registry trial.

Single institution experience with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET).

623 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare but increasing in incidence. The only curative treatment is surgery, which in many cases is not an option due to metastatic disease at diagnosis. The NETTER-1 study showed high efficacy and low toxicity of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for midgut NETs. Here, we present our initial experience with PRRT in the treatment of patients with NET. Methods: Fifty-two patients (27 males and 25 females; 37 - 81 yo, mean ± SD: 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with documented progressive NET (25 pancreas, 17 small intestine, 1 coecum, 4 unknown primary, 3 paragangliomas, and 2 pheochromocytomas) were referred to undergo PRRT at our institution from July 2018 to September 2019. Laboratory tests were obtained at baseline, 1 week before each cycle and every 3 months following treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and toxicity were assessed. An interim overall survival (OS) analysis was performed. Results, when possible, were compared with the NETTER-1 trial. Lines of therapy were documented. Results: 22/52 (42%) patients completed all 4 cycles of PRRT. 18/52 (34%) patients are currently being treated. 12/52 (23%) patients had to discontinue treatment. Hematotoxicity was the only side effect which can be related to PRRT. The 6-month and 9-month PFS rate was 82.4% and 66.8% respectively vs. 89% and 84% in the NETTER-1 trial. The ORR was 36% vs. 18% in the NETTER-1 trial. In the interim OS analysis, 6 deaths occurred. In contrast to the NETTER-1 study, PRRT in our patient cohort was performed later in the course of treatment (median lines of therapy before PRRT = 4 ±1.3 (range 1-6)). Conclusions: Our preliminary data show overall good results of PRRT in patients with NETs. However, compared to the NETTER-1 trial, PFS is shorter which is most likely due to the extensive pretreatment, but ORR was higher. [Table: see text]

'Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in the management of advanced pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis'.

Inoperable and metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) present a therapeutic challenge with current treatment options being limited to radiolabelled meta-iodo-benzyl-guanidine (MIBG) and systemic chemotherapy. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) seems to be a promising option for these patients with few studies reporting favourable response. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRRT in patients with advanced PPGLs. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus and Embase were made using relevant keywords and articles up to May 2019 were included. Data on efficacy and toxicity were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates were generated using meta-analysis. Twelve articles consisting of 201 patients with advanced PPGLs were included. Overall, treatment with PRRT achieved an objective response rate of 25% (95% CI: 19%-32%) and a disease control rate of 84% (95% CI: 77%-89%). Clinical and biochemical responses were seen in 61% and 64% of the patients, respectively. Among the PRRTs, similar tumour response rates were noted for 90 Y-yttrium- and 177 Lu-lutetium-based agents. Treatment-related adverse effects were minimal with grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia and nephrotoxicity observed in 3%, 9%, 11% and 4% of the patients, respectively. Treatment discontinuation was noted in five out of 102 patients. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a safe and efficacious treatment option for advanced PPGLs and may be considered a viable alternative to chemotherapy and I-131 MIBG.

A Clinical Efficacy of PRRT in Patients with Advanced, Nonresectable, Paraganglioma-Pheochromocytoma, Related to SDHx Gene Mutation.

Paragangliomas and pheochromytomas (PPGLs) exhibit variable malignancy, advanced/hormonally active/progressive need therapy. PRRT (Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy) could be an option for these patients. To evaluate the effectiveness of PRRT (90Y DOTATATE), based on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), in patients with PPGLs, related to SDHx gene mutation, we conducted a prospective open-label, single-center, phase II study. Thirteen patients were observed, eight PGL1 and five PGL4, all with advanced, non-resectable tumors, and eight had metastases. All were treated with 90Y DOTATATE. Efficacy was based on OS and PFS, and radiological response was based on RECIST. Hormonal activity was evaluated using serum-fractionated free catecholamines. Eight subjects had a clinical response, three were stable, and two exhibited disease progression. Among four patients with hormonally-active PPGLs, three showed a reduction and one showed normalization. OS for all was 68.0 months; PFS was 35.0 months. OS in PGL4 = 25.0 vs. N.R. (not reached) in PGL1. PFS in PGL4 = 12.0 vs. N.R. in PGL1. A difference was seen in the OS and PFS in patients who did not respond clinically, compared to those who did, OS = 22.0 vs. N.R. PFS = 7.0 vs. N.R. A difference in the OS and PFS was noted in patients with liver and bone involvement compared to those without. PRRT is an effective therapy in selected population of patients with SDHx, in those with locally-advanced, non-resectable tumors. Furthermore, it is effective regardless of the secretory status.

Surgery and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: An effective multimodal approach for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

4113 Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) of the pancreas (PanNEN) or small bowel (SBNEN) frequently present with metastases at initial diagnosis, undermining the efficacy of surgical treatment. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues, 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE, has been shown to achieve prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a substantial number of non-surgical patients with advanced NEN. Our aim was to prospectively determine the efficacy of a combination of radical loco-regional surgery and 177Lu PRRT in patients with metastasised NEN. Methods: A set of inclusion criteria was defined (e.g. PanNEN or SBNEN, G1/G2 NEN, initial tumour diagnosis, treatment naïve patient, stage IV NEN, positivity on 68Ga DOTATATE or DOTATOC PET/CT, eligibility for surgery and PRRT). Patients underwent PRRT within 3 months following surgery. Follow-up included biochemistry and imaging. Outcome measures included 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and PFS from initial diagnosis. Results: Forty-one patients met eligibility criteria and were included. There were 26 males (63.4%) and median age at surgery was 58.8 years (range 32.1-78.3). All patients with SBNEN underwent right hemicolectomy, terminal ileal resection and mesenteric lympadenectomy. In PanNEN patients either Whipple procedure or distal pancreatectomy and peripancreatic lymphadenectomy were performed. The median number of PRRT cycles was 4 (range 2-6). Post-treatment mortality was 0%. Surgical morbidity was 12% (all grade 1 according Clavien-Dindo) and transient grade 1 toxicity occurred post PRRT in 40%. There was no grade 3 toxicity. Median follow-up was 5.48 years (range 0.53 – 11.98). Median PFS and OS were 3.33 years and 9.07 years, respectively. Progression-free survival (with 95% CI) was at 1-, 3-, and 5-years 80% (68.7-92.6), 60.9% (45.9-75.9) and 43.3% (27.4-59.3), respectively. Overall survival (with 95% CI) at 1-, 3-, and 5-years was 97.6% (93-100), 97.6% (93-100), and 95% (87-100), respectively. Conclusions: Radical loco-regional surgery for primary tumours combined with PRRT provides a novel, highly efficacious approach in metastasised NEN.

A Care Process Model to Deliver 177Lu-Dotatate Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Purpose: To develop a care process model for the delivery of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with lutetium-177 (177Lu)-Dotatate for the treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).Methods: A multidisciplinary, structured PRRT process model was established. Over the last 9 months, meetings were held bi-weekly to discuss the logistics of clinical trials. Meetings are still held regularly at the Mayo Clinic Florida to discuss plans regarding commercially available PRRT treatments. The process model has evolved as we have treated patients on both clinical trials and commercial treatments.Results: An effective process model was formulated. We had 5 patients on our Expanded Access Program (EAP) clinical trial. Our ability to be a part of the EAP allowed us to understand the mechanics of how to treat these patients, and what was involved before it became commercially available. Since commercial availability of the 177Lu-Dotatate, more than 50 treatments (>20 patients) have already been completed, with several new patients getting started on treatment every week. Our nuclear medicine department receives continual requests to schedule new patients for PRRT. This can be attributed to our streamlined approach in delivering PRRT to our patients.Conclusion: A thorough procedural approach was formulated to provide patients with PRRT. Experiences and challenges led to refinement, which has allowed the process to advance. This development could lead to better patient outcomes, treatment efficiency, and a reference standard for other institutions trying to develop this at their location.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in gastroenteropancreatic NEN G3: a multicenter cohort study.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors grade 1-2 (G1-G2). However, its possible benefit in high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN G3) is largely unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the benefits and side effects of PRRT in patients with GEP NEN G3. We performed a retrospective cohort study at 12 centers to assess the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT in patients with GEP NEN G3. Outcomes were response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. We included 149 patients (primary tumor: pancreatic n = 89, gastrointestinal n = 34, unknown n = 26). PRRT was first-line (n = 30), second-line (n = 62) or later-line treatment (n = 57). Of 114 patients evaluated, 1% had complete response, 41% partial response, 38% stable disease and 20% progressive disease. Of 104 patients with documented progressive disease before PRRT, disease control rate was 69%. The total cohort had median PFS of 14 months and OS of 29 months. Ki-67 21-54% (n = 125) vs Ki-67 ≥55% (n = 23): PFS 16 vs 6 months (P < 0.001) and OS 31 vs 9 months (P < 0.001). Well (n = 60) vs poorly differentiated NEN (n = 62): PFS 19 vs 8 months (P < 0.001) and OS 44 vs 19 months (P < 0.001). Grade 3-4 hematological or renal toxicity occurred in 17% of patients. This large multicenter cohort of patients with GEP NEN G3 treated with PRRT demonstrates promising response rates, disease control rates, PFS and OS as well as toxicity in patients with mainly progressive disease. Based on these results, PRRT may be considered for patients with GEP NEN G3.

Highly favourable outcomes with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for metastatic rectal neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN).

Rectal neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is more common than other NEN origins, but is less commonly metastatic. However, when present, distant disease carries a particularly poor prognosis. Evidence guiding optimal treatment of such patients is lacking. We assessed PRRT outcomes in patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive metastatic rectal NEN from two referral centres. Patients treated with PRRT were retrospectively reviewed. Morphologic (RECIST 1.1), SSTR imaging responses and toxicity were assessed 3months post-PRRT. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from start of PRRT. Twenty-seven consecutive patients (M = 20, age 31-81 years) were reviewed. The majority (70%) had ENETs grade 2 disease (19 patients), three had Grade 3, one Grade 1, and four not documented. Overall, 63% (10/16 patients with available FDG PET/CT) had FDG avid disease. Twenty-six patients were treated for disease progression. Most had 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate with median cumulative activity of 30GBq, median fourcycles. 14 patients had radiosensitising chemotherapy (5FU or capecitabine). At 3months post-PRRT, CT disease control rate (DCR) was 96%: partial response was observed in 70% (19/27) and stable disease in 26%. All but one had partial SSTR imaging response. The median PFS was 29months. Ten patients died, with median overall survival 81months with a median follow-up of 67months. Seventeen patients had further treatments after initial PRRT (10 had further cycles of PRRT). Three patients had grade 3 lymphopenia, without significant renal toxicity, MDS or leukaemia. Our results indicate high efficacy and morphologic responses with minimal toxicity and very encouraging survival from PRRT in patients with metastatic rectal NEN despite the adverse prognostic features of this cohort. Further prospective PRRT trials are warranted in this subgroup.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Safety and Survival Analysis in 69 Patients.

To date, limited data are available concerning peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) with a Ki-67 proliferation index of greater than 20%. The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term outcome, efficacy, and safety of PRRT in patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-expressing G3 NENs. Methods: A total of 69 patients (41 men; age, 28-81 y) received PRRT with 177Lu- or 90Y-labeled somatostatin analogs (DOTATATE or DOTATOC). Twenty-two patients had radiosensitizing chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), defined from the start of PRRT, including a subgroup analysis for patients with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% and a Ki-67 index of greater than 55%. Treatment response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 as well as molecular imaging criteria (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). Short- and long-term toxicity was documented (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 5.0) using a structured database (comprising >250 items per patient) and retrospectively analyzed. Results: Forty-six patients had pancreatic NENs, 11 had unknown primary cancer, 6 had midgut NENs, 3 had gastric NENs, and 3 had rectal NENs. The median follow-up was 94.3 mo. The median PFS was 9.6 mo, and the median OS was 19.9 mo. For G3 NENs with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% (n = 53), the median PFS was 11 mo and the median OS was 22 mo. Patients with a Ki-67 index of greater than 55% (n = 11) had a median PFS of 4 mo and a median OS of 7 mo. For patients with positive SSTR imaging but no 18F-FDG uptake, the median PFS was 24 mo and the median OS was 42 mo. A significant difference was found for both PFS and OS, with median PFS of 16 mo and 5 mo and median OS of 27 mo and 9 mo for an SUVmax of greater than 15.0 and an SUVmax of less than or equal to 15.0, respectively, on SSTR PET. In the group with 18F-FDG uptake scored as 3 or 4, the median PFS was 7.1 mo and the median OS was 17.2 mo. In the group with 18F-FDG uptake scored as 0-2, the median PFS was 24.3 mo and the median OS was 41.6 mo. PRRT was well tolerated by all patients; no grade 3 or grade 4 hematotoxicity occurred, and no clinically significant decline in renal function was observed. There was no hepatotoxicity. Conclusion: PRRT was tolerated well, without significant adverse effects, and was efficacious in G3 NENs; the clinical outcome was promising, especially in patients with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% and even in patients for whom chemotherapy had failed. Baseline 18F-FDG along with SSTR molecular imaging was useful for stratifying G3 NEN patients with high uptake on SSTR PET/CT and no or minor 18F-FDG avidity-a mismatch pattern that was associated with a better long-term prognosis.

Surgery in combination with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is effective in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and is definable by blood gene transcript analysis.

e15697 Background: Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of the pancreas (PNET) or small bowel (SBNET) frequently present with metastases at initial diagnosis, undermining the efficacy of surgical treatment. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues, 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE, has been shown to achieve prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in a substantial number of non-surgical patients with advanced NET. Our aim was to prospectively determine the efficacy of a combination of radical loco-regional surgery and PRRT in patients with metastasised NET. Methods: A set of inclusion criteria was defined (e.g. G1/G2 NET, initial tumour diagnosis, treatment naïve patient, stage IV NET, positivity on 68Ga DOTA- PET/CT, eligibility for surgery and PRRT). Patients underwent PRRT within 3 months following surgery. Follow-up included biochemistry and imaging. In a sub-cohort, blood-based neuroendocrine gene transcript analysis of 51 genes (NETest) was used to define the effectiveness of treatment. Outcome measures included 5-year overall survival (OS) and PFS from initial diagnosis. Results: Twenty-five patients (5 PNET, 20 SBNET) met eligibility criteria and were included. There were 13 men (52%) and mean age was 57.1 years. All patients with SB NET underwent right hemicolectomy, terminal ileal resection and mesenteric lympadenectomy. In all PNET patients only limited pancreatic resection was required. The median number of PRRT cycles was 4 (range 2-6). Post-treatment mortality was 0%. Surgical morbidity was 12% (all Clavien-Dindo grade 1). Transient grade 1 toxicity occurred post-PRRT in 40%. NETest scores were increased in 8 patients (100%) pre-operatively and decreased in all following treatment. NETest decreases correlated with diminished tumour volume (R2=0.37, p=0.02). Median follow-up was 48 months (range 12-72months). Five-year OS was 90% and 5-year PFS was 84.3%. Conclusions: Radical loco-regional surgery for primary tumours combined with PRRT provides a novel, highly efficacious approach in metastasised NET. The NETest accurately measures the effectiveness of treatment.