IT MAY BE CONTENDED that any one person's critical evaluation of pension plans must be inadequate since his notion as to the success or failure of the plan will depend on what goal he has in mind for it. The argument follows that since plans serve different purposes for different people, a poor mark in its evaluation by one person may have no relevance in evaluating its success for another person. To be more specific, it is often stated as a foregone conclusion that the goals set for pension plans by the Government are inconsistent with the objectives of employers; with the result that a poor mark from the Government may merely indicate the success of the plan from the employer's point of view. This argument will not withstand a critical evaluation. In many respects, the success or failure of a pension plan in fulfilling its expectations will depend on constant factors; whether this success or failure is from the viewpoint of the employer, the employee, or the Government. An example in point is the matter of guaranteeing that an employee's pension expectations will, in fact, be met through the payment of pension benefits to him. For the employer, a pension plan will surely survive its critical evaluation if it serves as an effective inducement to prospective employees and, at the same time, acts as a positive incentive for his existing employees to stay with the company. In either respect, however, the plan will be a success only if there is a reality behind its promise and this reality is known to the employees. If not, the pension plan certainly will not be a factor in an employee's decision to join-and remain-with the company. For the employee, a pension plan will probably represent an important element in his retirement planning. With this promise of retirement funds, he will feel secure in using more of his present income for other types of savings or perhaps for consumption. If he retires and receives his pension, his critical evaluation will likewise be positive. If, on the other hand, there are no funds to meet his benefit payments, the plan from his standpoint is an utter failure. For society, private pension plans represent a valuable supplement to the basic social security system. They enable employees to retire with incomes more closely related to their existing standards of living than would be possible by relying solely on the social security system within its present structure. If the private retirement system is successful in meeting this goal, society, as a whole, would undoubtedly give it a high mark in its critical evaluation. However, this goal can be met only if the pension plans, in fact, make the pension distributions which they promise. Thus, there is at least one common measure of the success or failure of a