Penile Prosthesis Placement Research Articles

Double distal corporal anchoring stitch for lateral penile implant cylinder extrusion.

The ventral and distal aspects of the corpora cavernosa are the thinnest, increasing the likelihood of cylinder extrusion or crossover complications pertaining to inflatable penile prosthesis procedures. A double distal corporal anchoring double stitch can be used to robustly secure impending lateral extrusions and crossovers of implant cylinders. It is a novel, effective corrective measure for the uncommon complication of migrated cylinders in inflatable penile prosthesis placement. To describe the surgical indications and technique for the double distal corporal anchoring fixation stitch for lateral penile implant cylinder extrusion. We discuss a double-stitch technique that is performed following corporoplasty and capsulotomy. A lateral incision is made subcoronally on the affected side to identify the crossover or lateral extrusion. The cylinder is repositioned properly within the native corpora to prevent further cylinder migration. Two 2-0 Ethibond sutures are threaded through the distal cylinder eyelet, and each suture is delivered through the glans with a Keith needle and tied off. An incision is made in the glans, and 1 arm of each suture is tied with the other to create a bridge between the sutures that can be positioned deep within the skin of the glans. Over the past 4 years, 66 patients with lateral cylinder extrusion underwent the double distal corporal anchoring fixation stitch procedure, with overall improved satisfaction (97%). Only 2 patients had surgical complications. One patient experienced repeated lateral extrusion of the penile implant cylinders 6 weeks following the double-anchoring stitches procedure. The second patient developed a painful suture granuloma that necessitated excision, which resolved this issue, and the penile implant cylinder remained in the proper position over a year later. This technique ensures the secure fixation of the affected cylinders in the surgical capsule by creating a bridge between 2 sutures holding each repositioned cylinder in place, and the ensuing fibrotic reaction helps to fixate the extruded cylinder within the midglandular tissue. This surgical technique describes the double distal corporal anchoring stitch for lateral penile implant cylinder extrusion. Further studies are warranted to validate long-term outcomes and satisfaction. The double distal corporal anchoring fixation stitch is a safe and efficacious method to secure cylinders in the proper surgical capsule during revision procedures to correct distal crossovers or laterally extruded penile prosthesis implants.

A global, propensity-score matched analysis of patients receiving inflatable penile prostheses and the risk of complications, infections, and re-interventions.

Over 25,000 men undergo inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement yearly to treat erectile dysfunction (ED). Although various comorbidities are hypothesized risk factors for complications, this remains incompletely understood. Our objective was to utilize multi-institutional data to characterize risk for reintervention, complications, and infections in patients with common suspected risk factors undergoing IPP placement. We queried the TriNetX database for adult men who underwent IPP placement from 2003-2023 utilizing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We examined the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), nicotine use, radiation therapy (RT), radical prostatectomy (RP), and urethral surgery [urethroplasty, artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), male urethral sling (MS)] on clinical outcomes defined by International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. Our primary outcome was need for reintervention based on CPT codes. Secondary outcomes included overall rates of complication and infection utilizing ICD-10 codes. Analytics were performed using TriNetX to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival. We evaluated outcomes overall and for each individual comparison cohort using the remaining demographic variables to perform propensity score matching (PSM). In a total of 11,026 patients there was an overall 13.5% risk of undergoing at least one reintervention, with some undergoing multiple based on CPT codes. KM analysis showed a median IPP survival of 18.2 years and a projected 10- and 20-year survival probability at 70.6% and 48.4% respectively. Overall complication rate was 19.3% with a 5.2% rate of infection based on ICD codes. Patients with history of urethral surgery were at higher risk of both IPP complication and re-intervention. When further analyzing type of re-intervention, patients with a history of smoking, prior RP, and prior AUS/MS placement had higher rates of device removal. Patients with a history of diabetes were less likely to undergo IPP replacement at the time of explant. There were no identified risk factors for IPP infection. This is the largest cohort of patients ever evaluated and can help guide patient selection and counseling. There was a higher rate of IPP complications than previously reported, but this may be due to different reporting parameters. History of prior urethral surgery conferred a higher risk of complications and re-intervention. These results can help guide patient selection and counseling.

Reply to Editorial Comment on “Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement”

Reply to Editorial Comment on “Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement”

Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement

ObjectivesTo evaluate predictors of implant length for men undergoing primary IPP placement. MethodsA multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed for men undergoing primary IPP placement at 16 high-volume surgical centers. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative approach, and implanted cylinder and rear tip extender length were recorded. Associations between potential preoperative and intraoperative predictors of total device length were tested using non-parametric correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests, followed by multiple regression. ResultsOf 3,951 men undergoing primary IPP placement from July 2016 – July 2021, the median implant length was 20 cm (IQR: 19 – 22). Shorter implant length was associated with increasing age in years (β = -0.01, p=0.009), Asian ethnicity (β = -2.34, p=0.008), history of radical prostatectomy (β = -0.35, p=0.001), and use of an infrapubic surgical approach (β = -1.02, p<0.001). Black or African American ethnicity was associated with the implantation of longer devices (β = 0.35, p<0.001). No significant associations were recorded with BMI, history of intracavernosal injections, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, radiation therapy, Peyronie’s disease, priapism, or cavernosal dilation technique. ConclusionsThe length of an implanted penile prosthesis was found to be associated with preoperative and intraoperative factors including history of radical prostatectomy and operative approach. The knowledge of these associations may assist in the preoperative counseling of patients receiving IPP and help create accurate postoperative expectations.

Editorial Comment on “Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement”

Editorial Comment on “Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement”

The relationship between Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) and ischemic priapism: a case-control study.

This multicentre retrospective study was conducted in 3 university hospitals in Egypt between April 2020 and June 2022. The aim was to assess the relation between Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) and ischemic priapism. Forty-three ischemic priapism patients were diagnosed and divided into two groups (30 in group I with ischemic priapism only, and 13 in group II with both ischemic priapism and COVID-19). Further sub-classification of COVID-19 patients according to the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection severity was done. Cavernosal aspiration was successful in 25 patients (83.3%) in group I and 12 (92.3%) in group II. Long term follow-up proved moderate to severe erectile dysfunction in 6 patients (20.0%) and 1 (7.7%) in group I and II, respectively. All those with severe erectile dysfunction were managed by distal shunt and prepared for penile prosthesis placement. The median duration of ischemic priapism was significantly longer in patients with severe erectile dysfunction [19 vs. 7 h, P = 0.01]. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding patients' age (p = 0.8), required priapism management (p = 0.4), priapism recurrence (p = 0.1), and erectile dysfunction severity (p = 0.5). Ischemic priapism in COVID-19 patients can occur not only in severe, but also in mild or even asymptomatic cases. COVID-19 did not influence the ischemic priapism treatment protocol and post-treatment erectile function. COVID-19 and ischemic priapism seem to have a coincidence relation rather than a causal.

Prescribing semaglutide for weight loss in non-diabetic, obese patients is associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction: a TriNetX database study.

Semaglutide was approved in June 2021 for weight loss in non-diabetic, obese patients. While package inserts include sexual dysfunction as a side effect, no study has assessed the degree of this risk. The objective of our study is to assess the risk of developing erectile dysfunction after semaglutide is prescribed for weight loss in obese, non-diabetic men. The TriNetX Research database was used to identify men without a diagnosis of diabetes ages 18 to 50 with BMI > 30 who were prescribed semaglutide after June 1st, 2021. Men were excluded if they had a prior erectile dysfunction diagnosis, any phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors prescription, intracavernosal injections, penile prosthesis placement, history of testosterone deficiency, testosterone prescription, pelvic radiation, radical prostatectomy, pulmonary hypertension, or were deceased. We further restricted our cohort to non-diabetic, obese men by excluding men with a prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, a hemoglobin A1c > 6.5%, or having ever received insulin or metformin. Men were then stratified into cohorts of those that did and did not receive a semaglutide prescription. The primary outcome was the risk of new ED diagnosis and/or new prescription of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors at least one month after prescription of semaglutide. The secondary outcome was risk of testosterone deficiency diagnosis. Risk was reported using risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). 3,094 non-diabetic, obese men ages 18-50 who received a prescription of semaglutide were identified and subsequently matched to an equal number cohort of non-diabetic, obese men who never received a prescription of semaglutide. After matching, average age at index prescription for non-diabetic, obese men was 37.8 ± 7.8 and average BMI at index prescription was 38.6 ± 5.6. Non-diabetic men prescribed semaglutide were significantly more likely to develop erectile dysfunction and/or were prescribed phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (1.47% vs 0.32%; RR: 4.5; 95% CI [2.3, 9.0]) and testosterone deficiency (1.53% vs 0.80%; RR: 1.9; 95% CI [1.2, 3.1]) when compared to the control cohort of non-diabetic men who never received a semaglutide prescription.

Early Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation offers superior outcomes compared to delayed insertion following ischemic priapism: a narrative review.

Ischemic priapism is a urological emergency which may lead to irreversible erectile dysfunction. One of the accepted treatments is penile prosthesis implantation. Given the scarcity of studies directly comparing timing of penile prosthesis insertion after ischemic priapism, consensus remains elusive. We aim to compare different studies in the literature concerning advantages and disadvantages of early versus delayed inflatable penile prosthesis following ischemic priapism. We analyzed 8 articles that investigated immediate and delayed inflatable penile prosthesis placement after ischemic priapism. Early inflatable penile prosthesis placement is associated with better outcomes, including pain relief, priapism resolution, penile shortening prevention, and quicker sexual activity resumption. However, it still carries a high risk of complications like edema, infection, and distal perforations. Delayed inflatable penile prosthesis insertion poses surgical challenges due to the potential for extensive corporal fibrosis. Comparative analyses have shown elevated complication rates in patients with ischemic priapism who undergo delayed inflatable penile prosthesis insertion, as opposed to those with early insertion. In studies reporting complications rates, the total complication rate in the early group was 3.37%, significantly lower than the delayed group (37.23%). Most studies support the superiority of early inflatable penile prosthesis placement following ischemic priapism over delayed placement. Further research is, however, needed to establish a global consensus on timing of prosthesis insertion.

Salvage procedures for infected penile implants: A comprehensive review and analysis of functional outcomes

BackgroundThe salvage procedure for infected penile implants (IPs) has been a subject of interest since its inception in the late 1980s, yet its widespread adoption remains limited. The aim of this study was to realize a systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive analysis of salvage techniques for IPs and assess their efficacy, specifically focusing on functional success. MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, employing Mesh terms related to penile prosthesis, penile implant, infection, and salvage procedures. Articles in French or English were considered for the final analysis, with exclusion of literature reviews. ResultsFifteen articles detailing various salvage techniques for IPs were identified. Mulcahy's initial technique was described in 1996, and consisted of complete removal of infected components, extensive lavage, and subsequent replacement with a similar implant. Success rates ranged from 80% to 100%, with emerging trends favoring the use of malleable implants during salvage. Unfortunately, functional data remained limited. When salvage penile prosthesis placement involved a malleable prosthesis, between 20% and 33% of patients underwent conversion to hydraulic prosthesis. ConclusionThe salvage procedure for infected penile implants is a reliable method, with success rates surpassing 80%. The need for comparative studies assessing the type of implant used during salvage is required to tailor conservative management strategies for optimal patient outcomes. Finally, few data have been published regarding subsequent conversions from malleable penile implants to hydraulic penile implants after salvage.

Penile prosthesis in priapism: a systematic review of outcomes and complications.

Priapism is a rare condition characterized by persistent erection of the penis that lasts more than 4 hours in the absence of sexual stimulation and is associated with significant morbidity and complications, including erectile dysfunction and penile fibrosis. Surgical management of priapism can be extremely challenging. We herein provide a comprehensive review that aims to evaluate the role of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation in the management of priapism. A systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of PP implantation in treating priapism and the long-term complications, outcomes, and patients' satisfaction rate. Out of 717 English-language studies published between 2002 and 2022, 17 were chosen for this review. Majority of patients had a malleable PP (MPP) implant, either early or delayed after the priapism episode. Early placement (EP) of PP is widely defined between studies ranging from less than 72 hours, within 1 week, and within 3 weeks. Most common causes of priapism were sickle cell anemia (SCA), medication-induced, and idiopathic. Studies show a higher satisfaction rate ranging between 80% and 100%, with sexual intercourse achievement ranging between 64.2% and 100%. Based on the GRADE system, included studies rated as very low quality of evidence. Commonly reported complications that arise after PP procedures, include device infection, erosion, curvature, and mechanical malfunction, such as auto-inflation. PP can be an effective treatment option for priapism, particularly in cases of ischemic priapism lasting more than 36 hours or recurrent priapism that is medically refractory. However, due to the very low quality of evidence, larger, well-designed studies are warranted where long-term outcomes, patients' satisfaction, and complications following priapism-related PP implantation are measured as endpoints.

Penoscrotal inflatable penile prosthesis recipients often fully recover from pain at two weeks following placement.

The symptoms and duration of pain following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery remains poorly understood. We characterize postoperative pain following penoscrotal 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis placement in patients managed with a standardized pain management protocol. This is a single-center prospective analysis of 96 virginal penoscrotal 3-piece IPP recipients (9/2019 to 9/2021) excluding patients with chronic pain, IPPs performed with alternative approaches or concomitantly with other surgeries and those with infections. Standardized pain questionnaire was performed by phone on post-operative day (POD) 2, 7, 14, and 30. The primary outcome was self-reported pain scores, measured by pain score 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable, "worst pain you have ever felt") at various locations (incision, penile, scrotal, abdominal) over the first 30 days postoperatively. A majority of pain reported was outside the scrotal area with 67.6% of complaints in the shaft, glans, abdomen and incision. From POD2 to POD30, there was a significant decrease in severe pain from 46.2 to 11.1% (p = 0.05) with an increase in mild pain from 23.1 to 62.4% (p = 0.05). Roughly half of the participants (47.9%, n = 46) reported no pain by POD14. Penoscrotal IPP recipients often fully recover from pain at the two-week period following surgery and those with lingering discomfort predominantly complain of penile shaft and glans pain.

Clinical Practice Patterns for Surgical Shunts and Penile Prosthesis Placement in Men With Priapism: A Retrospective Large Claims Database Analysis.

The objective of this study was to assess the rates of surgical shunting and prosthesis placement for acute ischemic priapism using a large multi-institutional claims database. A US claims database network (TriNetX Diamond Network) was queried from 2010 to 2020. We constructed a cohort of men ages ≥ 16 years who (1) had a diagnosis of priapism and (2) underwent an irrigation of the corpora cavernosa for priapism. We assessed the number of men who then had a surgical penile shunt or penile prosthesis placement. Demographics, time to surgical procedure, and order of procedures were collected. A total of 6392 men were identified with the diagnosis of priapism and the procedure of corpora cavernosal irrigation. Of these men, 693 (11%) proceeded to surgical shunt. One hundred forty-four men (2%) underwent initial penile prosthesis placement. Of the men undergoing initial penile prosthesis, only 17 of 144 (12%) cases occurred within the first month of corpora cavernosal irrigation. Finally, when assessing choice of initial shunts vs initial penile prosthesis before and after 2015, overall rates of initial shunt (10.0% vs 8.5%, P < .0001) and initial prosthesis (3.1% vs 2.1%, P < .0001) were lower after 2015 when compared with rates prior to 2015. In this US claims-based analysis of men presenting with ischemic priapism and treated with initial irrigation, a small percentage (11%) of men went on to receive surgical shunting, and only 2% received an initial prosthesis. Men receiving initial prostheses were more likely to have more comorbidities, and overall surgical management of priapism has decreased over time.

Glans hypermobility scale (GHS): A simple grading scale and description of a modified glanspexy technique.

Glans hypermobility (GH) is a well-described clinical entity that can have significant implications for cosmesis and function, resulting in sexual dissatisfaction, penile pain, and early device erosion, with an estimated incidence of 0.04% to 10%. We developed a novel grading scale to assess GH severity intraoperatively during primary inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement and describe a modified glanspexy technique to correct GH when encountered during IPP placement. 530 patients who underwent primary IPP placements from two high-volume prosthetic surgeons between February 2018 - November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed in order to identify the incidence of GH. Of these, 139 (26.2%) had hypermobility. Employing our new scaling system, grade 1, 2, and 3 GH was seen in 86 (16.2%), 29 (5.5%), and 24 (4.5%) cases, respectively. Increased implant size correlated with a decreased likelihood of GH incidence. Each increase in implant size by 1 cm decreased the incidence of detecting GH by 11.0% (OR = 0.89; p = 0.015). 11 patients underwent primary GH repair using our described technique. At one-year follow-up, one patient required repeat glanspexy for recurrent bothersome GH and a second patient developed a suture granuloma at the glanspexy incision requiring unilateral cylinder explant. Our modified glanspexy technique can be used to correct GH in any direction and is a useful tool for the prosthetic surgeon's armamentarium.

(103) Prior Intracavernosal Injection Therapy and Prostate Cancer Treatment are Both Independently Associated with Increased Risks of Complications in Men Undergoing Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement

Abstract Introduction Intracavernosal injection (ICI) therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED) carries a risk of corporal fibrosis, potentially making placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis more difficult. Prostate cancer treatment may also induce corporal fibrosis. Objective To assess whether a history of ICI or prostate cancer treatment is associated with complications following IPP placement. Methods A retrospective cohort study of primary IPP cases from 2016–2021 across 16 institutions. Patients were stratified by history of ICI and between-group differences in risk factors were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess for predictors of intraoperative complications, postoperative non-infectious complications and postoperative infection. Results A total of 2540 patients met inclusion criteria of which 781 (30.8%) had a history of ICI. Patients with a history of ICI tended to be older (mean 63 vs 64 years, p=0.002) and were more likely to have history of radical prostatectomy (21.0% vs. 32.1%, p&amp;lt;0.001) and/or radiation (5.51% vs 10.9%, p&amp;lt;0.001). On multivariable regression, a history of ICI, prostatectomy, and radiation were all significant predictors of intraoperative complications (OR 2.11, p=0.03; OR 2.27, p=0.03; OR 2.40, p=0.04, respectively). A history of ICI and patient age were predictors of non-infectious postoperative complications (OR 1.44, p=0.02, OR 1.02, p=0.004 respectively)). None of the variables were significant predictors of infection. Conclusions In men undergoing IPP placement, a history of ICI is associated with an increased risk of both intraoperative and postoperative, non-infectious complications. Prostate cancer treatment with radiation or surgery is independently associated with increased risk of intraoperative complications. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: D.O. has served as a consultant for Coloplast, Intuitive Surgical, and Fidelis. P.P. has served as a consultant for Coloplast, Boston Scientific, and Urofill. M.S. has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Coloplast. J.S. has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Coloplast. F.A.Y. has served as a consultant for Coloplast, Cynosure, Antares Pharma, Clarus Pharmaceuticals, and Acerus Pharma. M.S.G. has served as a consultant for Coloplast. The other authors disclose no conflicts.

(037) Trans Obturator Repositioning Sling (TOROS); Novel Proximal Fixation of Penile Prosthesis Cylinder in Neophallus

Abstract Introduction The placement of Penile Prosthesis (PP) in transgender men with a neophallus is technically demanding and poses challenges specifically related to the extracorporal proximal anchoring of the cylinders owing to the lack of proximal corpora. We herein designed a novel Trans-Obtutrator Repositioning Sling (TOROS) for the proximal PP cylinder anchoring in a phallus of cisgender man or a neophallus of transgender man. Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of this novel surgical approach for the extracorporal proximal PP cylinder anchoring (TOROS) in two patients (cisgender and transgender) through refashioned use of the AdVanceTM Male Sling System (Boston Scientific). We herein present one video (first patient) to demonstrate step by step surgical technique. Methods Two patients were included. First patient is a 38-year-old cisgender male with a history of micropenis who underwent anterolateral thigh phalloplasty in 2017 presents for PP insertion. Second patient is 35 year old transgender with history of right free flap forearm phalloplasty 2019 with prior failed PP revision presents with perineal pain at level of proximal PP cylinder. Both patients consented and elected to proceed. Results After careful identification of neophallus vascular pedicle with handheld doppler, a perineal midline incision was made. The space within the neophallus was carefully dissected, dilated up to 11mm with Hegar dilator and measured for upcoming PP cylinder. Next and similar AdVance Male Sling surgical approach, the Adductor Longus tendon identified as a landmark, a trocar was inserted carefully through the obturator foramen around the inferior ischiopubic ramus. The sling was pulled via perineal incision and refashioned into socket-like sling to house the proximal end of PP cylinder or Rear Tip Extender (RTE) (in this case). To further reinforce this connection, sling flanges wrapped around and suture fixated. Next a single-cylinder Ambicor PP (Boston Sci) is inserted. PP pump placed into the left perineal side. Total PP length was 15cm+2cm RTE. PP appeared cycling well. Skin closed in layers. Patient had an uneventful post-op course and discharged on POD #3. At the 6-week mark, the patient had no post-op complaints or complications. The patient has been able to cycle the penile implant twice daily without issue and satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. Conclusions Extra-corporal anchoring of PP cylinders using TOROS is a novel, feasible and potentially changing approach in cisgender or transgender men. Proximal anchoring of the cylinders on the inferior pubic ramus and ramus of the ischium through the modified and refashioned use of trans-obturator male sling mimic natural anatomical attachment of the proximal corpora, and the same approach can applied in a transgender man neophallus with apparent good stability with and without axial loading. Disclosure No.

(060) Epigenetic and Gene Expression Profiles in Non-Plaque Tissues from Men with Peyronie’s Disease

Abstract Introduction Peyronie’s Disease (PD) can significantly impact sexual function. A hereditary predisposition to PD suggests that genetic variants may exist, and gene expression may modulate the penetrance of the disease. Identification of changes in epigenetic and gene expression profiles will facilitate a deeper understanding of the disease and provide insight for more targeted therapies. Objective Our objective is to determine if PD is correlated with epigenetic variations and/or gene expression changes, as indicated by DNA methylation assessment and RNA sequencing. Methods Penile tunica albuginea samples (not from fibrotic plaques) were obtained from men with PD undergoing penile prosthesis placement. Control samples were collected from men with erectile dysfunction (ED) without PD undergoing penile prosthesis placement. DNA methylation analyses were performed on homogenized penile tissue samples via an Illumina Human MethylationEPIC BeadChip v2 array. Using the minfi package in R, beta values were produced for all 936,990 CpG sites for each sample and SWAN normalization was applied. Differentially methylated regions (DMR) were found via USEQ with a threshold Wilcoxon FDR score of 40. Gene expression levels were examined in PD and ED samples via RNA-sequencing. Gene expression data was compared against epigenetic data to determine if any epigenetics changes identified affected gene expression profiles. Results A total of 24 tissue samples were collected: 12 ED and 12 PD. USEQ yielded 36 total DMRs with an FDR score of 40 or greater (p-value&amp;lt;0.0001). Of these 36 DMRs, a Stanford GREAT analysis revealed 60 total gene-region associations and five implicated biological processes: anterior/posterior pattern specification, chordate embryonic development, embryo development (ending in birth or egg hatching), somitogenesis, and pattern specification process. Furthermore, differential gene expression analysis identified 76 genes with significant expression changes between PD and ED groups, of which 17 genes were upregulated while 59 were downregulated. Long noncoding RNAs and the keratocan gene showed notable expression differences between PD and ED groups. GO enrichment analysis revealed significant terms related to DNA binding and protein binding. None of the differentially regulated genes overlapped with identified DMRs. Conclusions This study identified distinct gene expression and DNA methylation patterns between PD and ED groups, despite PD samples not being taken from plaque regions, suggesting that more systemic changes may be present. Upregulated genes in PD included long noncoding RNAs and the keratocan gene, suggesting their involvement in disease pathogenesis. Long noncoding RNA overexpression may serve a regulatory function in gene expression or cell processes while overexpression of the keratocan gene may promote collagen accumulation and remodeling, leading to fibrous plaque formation. Likewise, DMRs and their region-gene associations suggest a role in early embryonic development for pathogenesis. Although RNA-seq did not indicate any significant differentially expressed genes that matched with gene-region associations correlated with DMRs, the significance and quantity of DMRs between ED and PD sample groups is indicative of affected biological processes that manifest in distinct pathophysiologies. Further research is needed to investigate if differentially regulated genes exist in DMRs that exhibited changes but did not meet the criteria threshold for inclusion here. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Contraline, Techfields Inc, Alto Neurosciences, Curebase.

Society of Urologic Prosthetic Surgeons' Coding and Billing Position Statement on Ancillary/Adjunct Penile Prosthesis Surgical Procedures: Part I

ObjectiveTo create a society position statement on common adjunct penile prosthesis (PP) procedures. While the Medicare Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) code book lists descriptions of procedures, it is very brief and lacks detail in the small subspecialty of prosthetic urology. At educational/research meetings, wide variation was found in how experts in prosthetic urology code the same procedures, and need for a standardized format in billing common ancillary surgery was voiced. MethodsA subcommittee within the Society of Prosthetic Urologic Surgeons (SUPS) developed a survey assessing coding options for several procedures commonly adjunct to PP placement, which was distributed in the fall of 2022. The results of the survey were used to develop consensus statements on coding adjunct PP procedures; statements were distributed among society membership and meetings for approval. ResultsThirty members replied to the survey; demographics were obtained as follows: 73% were trained in a fellowship, 50% identified as university/academic practitioners, and 50% in community/private practice; and 63% respondents place more than 50 implants annually. Only 1 of the 30 respondents stated confidence in coding for these ancillary procedures. Specifically, differences in how to code curvature correction procedures were observed throughout the survey results. ConclusionsOnly 1 in 30 prosthetic urologists expressed confidence in coding and billing of adjunct PP procedures, further confirming the need for a society position statement. Therefore, we generated a consensus society position statement on common surgeries that are adjunct to PP placement.

(288) Trends in Penile Prosthesis Placement in Men with Erectile Dysfunction

Abstract Introduction Erectile Dysfunction (ED) is a common problem impacting 20% of all men. Current treatment options include oral medications, vacuum erection devices, intraurethral suppositories, intracavernosal injections, and penile prosthesis placement (PPP). A shared decision-making framework is increasingly utilized for treatment decisions where an appropriate treatment is selected from all options based on the values and priorities of the patient and their partner. Objective Our objective is to identify trends in PPP, including the proportion of patients who pursue PPP as an initial treatment as well as the time from ED diagnosis to PPP. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all men with an ED diagnosis based on ICD9/ICD10 codes using the IBM MarketScan insurance claims database. The initial treatment option processed through an insurance claim following an ED diagnosis was identified and categorized using ICD, HCPCS, NDC, J, and CPT codes. Time from ED diagnosis to PPP was also recorded. Only patients with at least one year of enrollment pre-ED diagnosis and with at least one year of follow-up were included. Linear regressions were performed to investigate the trends of each year based on the time of initial ED diagnosis. Results We identified a total of 670,096 patients diagnosed with ED between 2012-2019. The mean age was 56 years (47-62). Of those patients, 11% were smokers, 29% had diabetes, 24% had cardiovascular disease, 65% had hypertension, and 29% were obese. Among those who received treatment, the most common initial treatment was oral medications in 26% of patients. PPP was an initial treatment in &amp;lt;1% of patients. The proportion of patients who underwent this surgical intervention as an initial treatment significantly decreased from 2012-2019 (P&amp;lt;0.001) as patients utilized other initial treatment modalities more commonly. Over the same period, the time from ED diagnosis to PPP significantly decreased from approximately 500 days in 2012 to &amp;lt;200 days in 2019 (P=0.001). Conclusions Although the proportion of patients who utilize other ED treatment options prior to PPP is higher, patients diagnosed with ED more recently undergo PPP in a significantly shorter timeframe. Utilization of other treatment modalities as an initial treatment option may stem from changes in insurance coverage. Patients moving more quickly from an ED diagnosis to PPP is likely due to several factors, including improvements in the device leading to less mechanical and infectious complications, familiarity with the device due to marketing, and an earlier discussion with the physician about the device based on a shared decision-making model. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Inherent bio, Paterna bio, Firmtech, Turtle health, Maximus, Carrot.

(218) Bladder Outlet Procedures Performed in Patients with a Penile Prosthesis Do Not Increase Device Complication Rates

Abstract Introduction At present, minimal evidence exists in the literature regarding the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with a penile prosthesis. While it is considered prudent to address BPH prior to penile prosthesis placement, no formal guidelines exist on this topic and in many instances, patients develop lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH after prosthesis placement. Thus, understanding how to safely manage BPH in this patient population is key to optimal outcomes. Objective The aim of this study was to understand if patients with a penile prosthesis who subsequently underwent bladder outlet procedures (BOP) had an increased risk of prosthesis complications compared to those patients who underwent BOP prior to their penile prosthesis placement. Methods An Institutional Review Board approved retrospective chart review of all penile prosthesis patients with concomitant BPH from 2008-2023 was undertaken. Men who underwent a BOP before and after penile prosthesis placement were identified and separately analyzed for patient demographics, type of outlet procedure performed, type of prosthesis placed, and complications following penile prosthesis surgery. Complications were defined as any device infections, device malfunctions, or the need for any sort of operative interventions including explant. Statistical analysis was then conducted to identify significant differences between these two cohorts. Results A total of 424 patients with a history of penile prosthesis and BPH were identified. Of this group, a total of 61 patients were found to have undergone a BOP. Specifically, 28 patients were found to have undergone a BOP following their penile prosthesis placement, and 33 were found to have undergone a BOP prior to their penile prosthesis placement. Amongst the two cohorts, there were no statistically significant differences in age, race, prostate volume, hemoglobin A1c levels, type of outlet procedure performed, and history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, radiation therapy, or smoking. Importantly, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two cohorts (P=0.910). Conclusions To our knowledge, this study is the largest ever analysis of penile prosthesis patients who underwent bladder outlet procedures. From this data, it seems that patients who undergo BOP after penile prosthesis surgery are not at increased risk for complications compared to those patients who undergo a BOP prior to penile prosthesis surgery. Given that this is a retrospective chart review of a multi-center, high-volume implant practice, further randomized controlled trials will be necessary to confirm these findings. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Abbvie.

(222) Simultaneous Inflatable Penile Prosthesis and Adjustable Male Sling: A Step-by-Step Surgical Technique

Abstract Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI) are common complications following radical prostatectomy (1). At twenty-four months post-surgery, approximately 43% of men experience some degree of ED, while UI affects around 15% of patients between twelve to twenty-four months (2, 3). Notably, nearly 20% of patients experience both ED and UI complications (4). Initial conservative management strategies include the use of PDE-5 inhibitors, intercavernosal injections, or a vacuum erectile device for ED and pelvic floor muscle training for UI (5). However, symptoms that persist or worsen beyond six months can be considered for surgical intervention (6). Surgical options include penile prosthesis implantation for ED and diverse techniques such as the Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) or adjustable male urethral sling, depending on symptom severity, for UI management. Limited evidence suggests that a simultaneous surgical approach addressing both conditions can be a cost-effective and a safe alternative to separate surgeries (7, 8). Objective In this context, the objective of this video presentation is to illustrate a detailed, step-by-step technique for the simultaneous implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and an adjustable male sling (AMS), while also discussing its feasibility, safety, and functional outcomes. Methods The combined IPP and AMS surgery is a safe, viable, and cost-effective option for patients who need to address both ED and UI. Rhee (2005) initially described the concurrent placement of a penile prosthesis (PP) and male sling (MS) in a series of four post-prostatectomy patients. Results The results demonstrated successful restoration of erections and complete continence in all patients, with no postoperative complications. Our previous systematic review, comparing the outcomes of simultaneous surgical placement of PP and MS versus PP and artificial urethral sphincter (AUS), found no clinically significant differences in outcomes between the two groups (Raheem 2021). Therefore, the simultaneous placement of IPP and AMS should be considered an option for patients, as it shows comparable effectiveness to other concurrent surgical interventions. Dual implantation of PP and male sling have also demonstrated cost savings of approximately $9,000 for patients, further enhancing its advantages in managing both ED and UI (Gorbatiy 2010). Ultimately, a collaborative discussion between patients and their urologist is crucial in determining the most suitable approach for patient individual needs. Conclusions The simultaneous surgical placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and adjustable male sling (AMS) presents a favorable and viable solution for managing erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI) in patients who exhibit an inadequate response to conservative management following prostatectomy. Disclosure No.