Penile Cancer Patients Research Articles

P006 Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (VEILND) has equivalent oncological efficacy and survival to Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (OILND) in penile cancer patients over a 15-year period

P006 Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (VEILND) has equivalent oncological efficacy and survival to Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (OILND) in penile cancer patients over a 15-year period

P005 Ultrasound (US) with Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) as an adjunct in staging cN0 penile cancer patients: Outcomes of a regional centre in the UK

P005 Ultrasound (US) with Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) as an adjunct in staging cN0 penile cancer patients: Outcomes of a regional centre in the UK

The prognostic value of the 8th American Joint Committee on cancer anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer: A multicenter collaboration study

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the value of 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer patients and explore whether there is room for improvement. MethodsThe clinical and histopathologic data from 16 centers between 2000 and 2021 were assessed according to the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. Kaplan–Meier plots were used to estimate the disease-specific survival (DSS) of the patients. The accuracy of the staging systems was investigated using the Harrell's concordance index (C-index). ResultsThe 5-year DSS rates for patients with stages 0is/a, I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IV (stage 0 to stage IV) disease were 100 %, 98.9 %, 85.5 %, 81.1 %, 65.8 %, 34.4 %, and 23.2 %, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.798, pI–IIA<0.001, pIIA–IIB=0.486, pIIB–IIIA<0.001, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, ptotal<0.001). According to the modified model 1 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100 %, 98.9 %, 87.8 %, 65.8 %, 34.4 %, and 23.2 %, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.798, pI–II<0.001, pII–IIIA=0.002, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, ptotal<0.001). Similarly, according to the modified model 2 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100 %, 99.0 %, 85.8 %, 65.8 %, 34.4 %, and 23.2 %, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.757, pI–II<0.001, pII–IIIA=0.008, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, ptotal<0.001). The C-index of the simple modified staging systems were not inferior to those of the AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. These results were confirmed by the bootstrap internal validation. ConclusionThere is still room for improvement about 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. The improved models, which are more concise and convenient, had a similar predictive value.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in Penile Cancer in Thailand.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are important etiological factors for several cancers. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of HPV and EBV infection in penile cancer. Forty-three formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded penile cancer tissue samples were analyzed for the HPV-induced p16INK4A protein by immunohistochemistry and Epstein-Barr encoding region in situ hybridization. Demographic data and overall survival were analyzed. The median age of patients was 59 years, ranging from 23 to 91 years old. Most of the tumors (86%) were located at the tip of the penis. HPV infection was positive in 12/43 (27.9%) patients. EBV infection was observed in 2/43 (4.6%) of cases and there was no co-infection detected in this cohort. Patients who had p16INK4A overexpression had a trend toward longer survival compared to those without; the median survival time of 104.4 vs 89 months, the hazard ratio of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.16-1.42, p = 0.173). One-third of penile cancer patients were positive for HPV-induced p16INK4A expression and there was a trend toward better survival in HPV-positive patients. EBV infection was infrequent in penile cancer in Thailand.

The impact of the tumor microenvironment on the survival of penile cancer patients

PeCa is a rare entity with rising incidence rates due to increased infections with human papillomaviruses (HPV). The distinct subtypes of PeCa with an individual pathogenesis demand biomarkers for a precise patient risk assessment regarding disease progression and therapeutic susceptibility. We recently identified promising candidates associated with an HPV-instructed tumor microenvironment (TME) using HPV-positive PeCa cell lines and tissue microarrays (TMA). The capacity of HPV + p63 + PeCa cells to release neutrophil-attracting CXCL-8 provided a molecular link explaining the infiltration of CD15 + myeloid cells in PeCa specimens. The candidate biomarkers HPV, p63, CD15, DKK1, and CD147 linked a tumor-promoting TME with a higher TNM classification reflecting more aggressive and metastasizing cancers. Based on immune-reactive scores (IRS) from TMA staining for these biomarkers, we calculated correlations and conducted association analyses to assess the degree of relationship between all biomarkers. We then conducted Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and Cox regression analyses to delineate the impact on PeCa patient survival. There is a notable predictive potential regarding the survival of patients with biomarker profiles beyond the potency of the individual biomarker. From all candidate biomarkers and biomarker profiles, the combination of CD147 and infiltrating CD15 + cells linked to an active HPV-driven transformation displayed cancer-immune dynamics with dismal prognosis for patients. After deciphering relevant interdependencies, the HPV + CD147 + CD15 + status was the most potent profile predicting metastasis-free survival of PeCa patients. The results of this report underscore the need for analysis of the TME and the development of multi-parameter composite scores that reflect fundamental cancer-immune relationships to tailor therapeutic interventions based on actual cancer immune dynamics.

Survival Analysis of Penile Cancer Patients Using Cox-Proportional Hazard and GPT-4

Today, in 2024, the evolution of the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is very impressive. An AI product that continues to develop is ChatGPT. The threat of ChatGPT to some job professions is real. Beside that, ChatGPT also helps many professions make their work easier. In this research, we analyze the survival analysis of penile cancer patients. The design of this research is mixed-method (quantitative-qualitative). The quantitative and qualitative methods that were used are Cox-proportional hazards and GPT-4, respectively. Based on quantitative analysis, it can be concluded that the Survival and Hazard model for study penile cancer are and , respectively. The predicted chances of survival and death for the patient in stage 2, 14 days after surgery, are 40% and 60%, respectively. Based on qualitative analysis, GPT-4 cannot quantitatively obtain the cox proportional hazard number. However, even so, GPT4 can read the cox proportional hazard output image, providing Python and R survival analysis coding quite perfectly. Thus, the qualitative method's conclusion is that GPT-4 can greatly assist data analysts in their analysis of survival data.

New histological risk grading system for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer

AbstractInguinal lymph node surgery is a standard treatment for penile cancer patients with intermediate or high risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) according to European Association of Urology (EAU) risk grading. We are proposing a more objective histological prognostic grading system for inguinal LNM in these patients. We assessed worst pattern of invasion, lymphocytic host response, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion in a population-based cohort of 306 penile cancer patients. Patients were classified into low, intermediate, and high risk for inguinal LNM. There was a significant association both between risk groups and pT stage (p &lt; 0.001) and between risk groups and LNM. Univariate logistic regression showed 25.43 times higher odds of LNM for patients in the intermediate risk group compared with the low risk group (odds ratio (OR) 25.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.94–108.97) and a 177.13 times higher odds in the high risk group compared to the low risk group (OR 177.13; 95% CI: 40.09–782.51). When comparing our histological risk grading with the EAU grading, we found a higher sensitivity, of 51.28% (95% CI: 45.68–56.88) versus 37.09% (95% CI: 31.68–42.50), as well as a higher area under the curve (0.86; 95% CI: 0.81–0.89; versus 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58–0.71) with our grading system. While our grading classified 111 patients as low risk, only 31 were considered low risk for LNM according to the EAU risk classification. The new histological risk grading system shows a higher sensitivity and includes a higher number of patients in the low risk group in whom lymph node surgery could be avoided, reducing morbidity and costs.

Expression of CD44highCD24Low cells, SOX2, and STAT3 transcription factors on peripheral blood and tumor tissue of penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Penile cancer is high in some underdeveloped countries. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and CD44, CD24, and SOX2+ are known to be markers of diagnosis and prognosis in other cancers, but without studies in penile cancer. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Hospital de Cancer de Pernambuco from March 2015 to December 2017. We performed SOX2, STAT3, CD24, and CD44 analyses in blood and tumor tissue by flow cytometry. High levels of CD44highCD24low, CD44highCD24lowpSTAT3+ and CD44hig hCD24low in the blood of patients compared to the controls (p < 0.05). Low of SOX2+ T cells in blood of patients compared to controls. High CD44highCD24low levels in patients with perineural invasion (PNI), tumor size > 3 cm, and pT2 stage (p < 0.05). High T cell levels in the blood and tumor tissue of patients with tumor ≤3 cm (p < 0.05). Increased SOX2+ T cells in blood of patients with PNI (-) and pT1 stage (p < 0.05). CD44highCD24lowpSTAT3+ (r = 0.669; p = 0.024) and SOX2+T cells (r = 0.404, p = 0.029) correlation were observed between blood and tumor tissue in penile cancer patients. CD44, CD24, and SOX2 molecules were markers of advanced disease associated with the worst prognosis in CaPe. However, pSTAT3 and T cells were associated with a more favorable prognosis in this study.

Detailed pathological characteristics and survival prognosis of patients with penile cancer from a high-capacity tertiary referral centre over a 20-year period.

120 Background: Penile cancer is a rare cancer that affects 0.1-1 per 100,000 men in developed countries. However, data on this cancer in developing countries, particularly in Asian populations, are lacking. A retrospective study is needed to determine the characteristics of penile cancer patients, tumor-related treatments, and prognosis. The objective of our study was to present statistical results that are applicable to an Asian population under the most recent staging system. Additionally, we aimed to report on the pathological characteristics and prognosis of a large sample of patients with penile cancer who underwent long-term follow-up with the standard extent of radical dissection. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed clinical and pathological data from 1017 patients who were diagnosed with penile cancer at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between October 2001 and October 2023. The primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan‒Meier method, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional risk models were used to analyze the factors associated with tumor survival. Results: The average follow-up time was 50 months (range: 0.6-232.8 months). The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 67.3% and 62.7%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year PFS rates were 63.9% and 61.1%, respectively. After excluding 127 Tx patients and 23 TIS stage patients, the 10-year OS rates of pTa stage (29 patients), pT1 (305 patients), pT2 stage (217 patients), pT3 stage (271 patients), and pT4 stage (45 patients) patients were 96.3%, 80.1%, 61.7%, 55.4%, and 14.2%, respectively. A total of 690 patients underwent standard lymph node dissection. The 10-year OS rates of pN0 (376 patients), pN1 (111 patients), pN2 (78 patients), and pN3 (125 patients) patients were 92.7%, 62.5%, 48.1% and 31.3%, respectively. The results of the multifactorial analysis revealed that T stage (T4 stage versus Ta-T1 stage: HR=2.38, 95% CI: 1.00~5.66, P=0.05), pathological grade (G3~4 grade versus G1~2 grade: HR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.05~2.53, P=0.027), N stage (pN+ versus pN0: HR=14.11, 95% CI: 7.83~25.43, P&lt;0.001), and white blood cell count (WBC&gt;8.5: HR=1.71, 95% CI: 1.17~2.51, P=0.006) were independent prognostic factors in penile cancer patients. Conclusions: Patients with penile cancer had better long-term OS after standard lymph node dissection. The adverse factors were T stage, pathological grade, extent of lymph node metastasis, and preoperative WBC count. Identifying high-risk patients through preoperative evaluation can improve long-term survival rates. Radical lymph node dissection in the early stage has more curative value, and adjuvant therapy should be provided in patients with advanced-stage disease after surgery.

Single centre real world data on disease profile and outcome of 700 patients with penile cancer treated with curative intent at an Indian cancer centre.

121 Background: Globocan 2022 reported that there are close to 10000 newly diagnosed penile cancer (PeCa) patients annually in India, which contributes to around 27% of the world’s burden of this disease. With the rarity of this male genitourinary cancer globally and absence of level I evidence on most aspects of the disease, real world data from a single Centre assumes importance and this retrospective study highlights the clinico-demographic profile, oncological outcome and surgical complications in patients treated with a curative intent. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained institutional database for patients with PeCa treated with curative intent from 2013 to 2021. Data was collected for demographic variables, clinico-pathological characteristics, post-operative complications and oncological outcomes. Descriptive data were expressed as mean / median / proportions. The Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate the cancer specific survival (CSS) of the patients, stratified by pN status. Results: From 2013 to 2021, 700 patients were treated for PeCa at our centre with curative intent, with a median age of 54 years (IQR 44-62) and a mean BMI of 24.1 kg/m2. Around 40% of the patients had history of tobacco use. The clinico-pathological features and Clavian Dindo complication rates are summarized in the table. With a median follow-up of 42 months, the CSS for cN0 patients under observation for their groins was 97.3%.CSS for patients with pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3 was 90.6%, 79.4%, 71.4% and 55%. Amongst pN3, 24.3% received adjuvant chemo alone, 23.7% received adjuvant RT/CTRT alone while 33.7% received both adjuvant chemo and RT.CSS of pelvic nodal pN3 patients was 35% compared to 71% of inguinal perinodal extension pN3. Conclusions: Our series, one of the largest reported from a single centre, highlights the real world oncological outcome of PeCa patients. We reemphasize the importance of addressing inguinal nodes early and adequately and the worser outcome of pN3 due to pelvic node involvement compared to pN3 due to extra nodal extension of inguinal nodes. [Table: see text]

Prognostic value and therapeutic response of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in penile cancer.

116 Background: Chronic inflammation mediated by poor genital hygiene is a well-recognized pathogenic trigger for penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and reproducible factor reflecting the systemic inflammatory response and has been reported as an unfavorable indicator in PSCC. However, previous studies limited by small sample sizes, confounding prognostic features and without high-quality evidence to demonstrate the clinical significance of the NLR. Methods: A large cohort of 582 penile cancer patients who underwent radical inguinal lymphadenectomy with definitive pN stages were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate prognostic factors and inflammation-related markers in PSCC patients. More importantly, the propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to minimize the prognostic confounding clinicopathological features. Immunofluorescence was further used to investigate the correlation between tumor-infiltrating neutrophils, CD8+ T cells and the NLR. Results: According to the ROC curve, the optimal cutoff value for the NLR was 3.0, and 226 (38.8%) PSCC patients had a high NLR. Survival analyses indicated that advanced pT, pN, pathological grade, lymphovascular invasion, high NLR, C-reactive protein (≥ 2.2 mg/L) and serum amyloid A (≥ 11.3 mg/L) were associated with poor PFS and CSS. After PSM to eliminate interference from clinical factors, pN and the NLR were found to be independent prognostic indicators in PSCC patients (both p&lt;0.001). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that the HR for PFS was 1.64 (1.15–2.34) in the high NLR group and 1.56 (1.04–2.34) in the high NLR group (p=0.006 and 0.030, respectively). PSCC patients with high NLRs experienced shorter PFS after receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy (p=0.037) and PD-1 immunotherapy (p=0.020). In addition, we found that the infiltration of tumor-associated neutrophils (CD66+) and the CD8+ T-cell ratio were positively correlated with the NLR. The development and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) might contribute to chemoresistance and tumor progression in high-NLR PSCC patients. Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated that the NLR is an effective, simple and independent prognostic indicator for PSCC. The NLR holds promise as a powerful tool to guide decision-making in clinical practice. [Table: see text]

The surgical technique and protocol for dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer at a Southeast Asian regional hospital.

Lymph node status is a key prognostic factor in penile cancer. The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommends intermediate-risk (pT1a, Grade 2) or high-risk (pT1b or greater) penile cancer patients with clinically non-palpable inguinal lymph node (cN0) to undergo either an invasive bilateral modified inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) or dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB). DSNB has been reported to have acceptable false negative rates, and lower rates of long-term morbidity compared to ILND. We developed a protocol for DSNB at a regional hospital in Singapore that was adopted from St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust. Four patients with cN0 penile cancer underwent DSNB between November 2021 and October 2022 according to this protocol. Our surgical technique and protocol are described. The patients' oncological characteristics and their outcomes were evaluated. In this small case series, there was no complication attributable to the performance of DSNB, and there was no groin that was documented to be false negative over a median follow up of 15.5 months (range, 12 to 22 months). Using our protocol, 5 of 8 groins (62.5%) were able to avoid ILND in the cN0 setting. We recommend the adoption of DSNB for the surgical staging of inguinal lymph nodes for patients with intermediate to high-risk penile cancer and non-palpable inguinal nodes due to its significantly lower risks of long-term morbidity compared to ILND. Appropriate specialist training and a multi-disciplinary team is vital to ensure the success of the procedure.

Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis of the penile cancer with distant metastasis.

Penile cancer (PC) is a rare malignant tumor, whose distant metastasis (DM) is associated with the poorest outcomes. The risk factors associated with DM and prognosis of the PC with DM remain elusive. This study was aimed at investigating risk factors associated with DM and constructing prediction models of PC with DM. This study analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database over a period of 2000-2020, including clinical characteristics such as age, marital status, tumor size, Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging, and treatment information. Utilizing univariate and multivariate logistic regression, alongside cox regression analysis, we identified independent risk factors for DM and prognosis in the total cases and the cases with DM. Nomograms were developed for predicting DM and prognosis in PC patients. Enrolling 1,488 cases, our study identified tumor size and N stage as independent predictors of DM. The predictive nomogram for DM achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.904. Notably, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates for PC with DM were 35%, 17%, and 13%, respectively, with larger tumor size associated with prognosis of PC cases with DM. This study verified a correlation between advanced age and TNM stage, as well as chemotherapy with the poor PC prognosis. The nomogram yielded 0.72, 0.69 and 0.69, in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survivals (OS), while 0.73, 0.70 and 0.69 in predicting 1-, 3-, 5-year cancer specific survivals (CSS), respectively. This study investigated risk factors of PC with DM. Also, nomograms for predicting DM, OS and CSS of PC patients were developed.

Comparative outcomes of partial versus total penectomy for penile carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study on demographics and postoperative complications.

When feasible from an oncologic standpoint, partial penectomy (PP) is often preferred to total penectomy (TP) for penile cancer treatment, for the preservation of functional urinary outcomes. However, to date, there has not been a direct comparison of perioperative outcomes between PP and TP. Comparing treatments for penile cancer has proven difficult due to the rarity of penile cancer in the United States. We aimed to report differences in pre-operative risk factors, intra-operative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes between TP and PP for penile cancer. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we conducted a retrospective cohort review of penile cancer patients enlisted in the database between the years 2006-2016 using the International Classification of Diseases clinical modification 9th revision codes. A total of 260 patients, 67 TP and 193 PP patients, were included. PP patients were less likely to be transferred patients (p = 0.002), diabetic (p = 0.026), and were more likely to have preoperative laboratory values within normal limits. PP patients also had shorter lengths of stay in the hospital (p < 0.001) and operating time (p < 0.001). Significant differences were also found for inpatient stay (p < 0.001), 30-day post-surgery complications (p < 0.001), deep incisional surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.017), wound disruption (p = 0.017), intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (p = 0.029), and sepsis (p < 0.005). Finally, PP patients required fewer concurrent surgical procedures (p < 0.001). Demographic differences between PP and TP patients may reflect patients presenting with more advanced oncologic disease. PP is associated with fewer postoperative complications, shorter surgeries, shorter hospital stays, fewer concurrent surgical procedures, and comorbid conditions compared to TP. A gap remains in the reported data pertaining to postoperative sexual function and erectile outcomes for PP at a national level.

Robot-Assisted Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: An Indian Multicenter Experience.

Objective: To report outcomes of multicenter series of penile cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection (RA-VEIL). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective analysis from 3 tertiary care centers in India, consecutive intermediate-/high-risk carcinoma penis (CaP) patients with nonpalpable inguinal lymphadenopathy and/or nonbulky (<3 cm) mobile inguinal lymphadenopathy undergoing RA-VEIL were included. Patients with matted/bulky (>3 cm) and fixed lymphadenopathy were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative data were recorded. Perioperative complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). The International Society of Lymphology (ISL) {0-III} grading was used for the assessment of lymphedema. Incidence and pattern of recurrences were assessed on follow-up. Results: From January 1, 2011, to September 30, 2023, 115 patients (230 groins) underwent bilateral RA-VEIL for CaP. The median age of the cohort was 60 (50-69) years. Clinically palpable (either unilateral or bilateral) inguinal lymphadenopathy was seen in 54 patients (47%). The "per groin" median operative time was 120 (100-140) minutes with median lymph node yield of 12 (9-16). No complications were recorded in 87.8% groins operated, with major complications (CDC 3) seen in 2.6% groins. At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, 13 patients had documented recurrences and there were 10 cancer-related deaths. No port-site recurrences were observed. No/minimal lymphedema (ISL 0/I) was seen in 94% legs. Conclusion: RA-VEIL demonstrates safety and oncologic efficacy in penile cancer patients presenting with clinically nonpalpable and/or nonbulky inguinal lymphadenopathy, with favorable functional outcomes.

Enhanced Prognostic Factors for Disease-Free Survival in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Insights From Songklanagarind Hospital

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes and associated prognostic factors among surgically treated penile cancer patients at Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand, over a 20-year period. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 208 primary penile cancer patients treated between January 2001 and December 2022. Disease-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazard models were employed for multivariate analysis. ResultsAll of patients (100%) were squamous cell carcinoma of penis, with 38.9% having T1 tumors, 70.7% well-differentiated tumors, and 32.6% diagnosed at stage III. The recurrence rate was 16.8%, with a mean time to recurrence of 25.9 months. Disease-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 82.1%, 72%, and 70.2%, respectively. Median overall survival was 18.2 months, with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years at 68.7%, 44.7%, and 36.4%, respectively. Significant associations were found between disease-free survival and higher T stage, clinical chronic inflammation, delayed onset of symptoms, primary lesion location, groin node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, and pelvic lymph node metastases. However, multivariate analysis revealed that higher primary tumor stage (T) was the only independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival. ConclusionThis study provides valuable insights into disease-free survival outcomes in penile cancer treatment at a single institution over an extended period. Higher pathologic T stage emerged as the sole independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival. Further validation through large-scale prospective studies is warranted.

Developing and validating a nomogram for penile cancer survival: A comprehensive study based on SEER and Chinese data.

The primary aim of this study was to create a nomogram for predicting survival outcomes in penile cancer patients, utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and a Chinese organization. Our study involved a cohort of 5744 patients diagnosed with penile cancer from the SEER database, spanning from 2004 to 2019. In addition, 103 patients with penile cancer from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were included during the same period. Based on the results of regression analysis, a nomogram is constructed and validated internally and externally. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated by concordance index (c-index), area under the curve, decision curve analysis, and calibration curve, in internal and external datasets. Finally, the prediction efficiency is compared with the TNM staging model. A total of 3154 penile patients were randomly divided into the training group and the internal validation group at a ratio of 2:1. Nine independent risk factors were identified, including age, race, marital status, tumor grade, histology, TNM stage, and the surgical approach. Based on these factors, a nomogram was constructed to predict OS. The nomogram demonstrated relatively better consistency, predictive accuracy, and clinical relevance, with a c-index over 0.73 (in the training cohort, the validation cohort, and externally validation cohort.) These evaluation indexes are far better than the TNM staging system. Penile cancer, often overlooked in research, has lacked detailed investigative focus and guidelines. This study stands as the first to validate penile cancer prognosis using extensive data from the SEER database, supplemented by data from our own institution. Our findings equip surgeons with an essential tool to predict the prognosis of penile cancer better suited than TNM, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making processes.

Robotic or open superficial inguinal lymph node dissection as staging procedures for clinically node negative high risk penile cancer

ObjectiveTo evaluate perioperative and oncologic outcomes of a cohort of clinically node negative high-risk penile cancer patients undergoing robotic assisted inguinal lymph node dissection (RAIL) compared to patients undergoing open superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (OSILND). Patients and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of clinically node negative high-risk penile cancer patients undergoing RAIL at MDACC from 2013-2019. We sought to compare this to a contemporary open cohort of clinically node negative patients treated from 1999 to 2019 at MDACC and Moffit Cancer Center (MCC) with an OSILND. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study cohorts. Comparison analysis between operative variables was performed using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival endpoints. ResultsThere were 24 patients in the RAIL cohort, and 35 in the OSILND cohort. Among the surgical variables, operative time (348.5 minutes vs. 239.0 minutes, P < 0.01) and the duration of operative drain (37 vs. 22 days P = 0.017) were both significantly longer in the RAIL cohort. Complication incidences were similar for both cohorts (34.3% for OSILND vs. 33.3% for RAIL), with wound complications making up 33% of all complications for RAIL and 31% of complications for OSILND. No inguinal recurrences were noted in either cohort. The median follow-up was 40 months for RAIL and 33 months for OSILND. ConclusionsWe observed similar complication rates and surgical variable outcomes in our analysis apart from operative time and operative drain duration. Oncological outcomes were similar between the two cohorts. RAIL was a reliable staging and potentially therapeutic procedure among clinically node negative patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma with comparable outcomes to an OSILND cohort.

Does MRI Have a Role in the Preoperative Staging of Penile Cancer?

Background Penile cancer is a rare malignancy usually requiring surgery to achieve oncological control of the primary tumour but often at the expense of functional length. The presenting stage of the primary is a crucial factor in determining the most appropriate surgical procedure. Accurate preoperative staging is essential, and current modalities include clinical and radiological assessment. Clinical staging can, however, be hampered by patient body habitus and unreliable for more advanced T4 tumours, whereas radiological staging allows for more detailed identification of tissue planes and tumour involvement. There is no clear consensus on the preferred imaging technique, although, in the current European Association of Urology penile cancer guidelines, MRI is recommended with the use of ultrasound when MRI is not available. It was recommended that having the penis in an erect state by the administration of intra-cavernosal prostaglandin gave a more detailed picture enabling a greater predictor of corporal involvement. Recent studies have, however, suggested that there may be no such advantage. Methodology A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent surgery for penile cancer comparing the preoperative MRI stage with the final pathological stage between July 2009 and June 2023.In addition to the MRI, patients were given an intra-cavernosal injection of prostaglandin E1 to induce tumescence unless otherwise indicated. All imaging was reported by a single consultant uro-radiologist with surgery undertaken by a single surgeon and pathology reviewed through the supra-regional penile multidisciplinary team. Results A total of 136 penile cancer patients were included in the review. Within this cohort, 98 patients had an MRI without intra-cavernosal prostaglandin and the number who had Ta, T1, T2, T3 and T4 histopathological stages was 3, 31, 45, 18, and 1, respectively. The preoperative MRI stage had a low agreement with the final histological stage for early tumours, with sensitivities and specificity of 35% and 97% for T1 and 56% and 80% for T2, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity increased for cavernosal involvement at 83% and 95%, respectively. In addition, a further 38 patients had an MRI in conjunction with an injection of prostaglandin E1 which failed to show any diagnostic improvement in sensitivity or specificity in the preoperative MRI stage. Conclusions The use of MRI as a preoperative modality for staging penile cancer performs best for identifying tumour involvement of the cavernosal bodies. Performing the MRI with the penis erect with the use of an intra-cavernosal injection did not offer any additional benefit in accurately staging penile cancer.

(239) Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients Receiving Partial vs Total Penectomy for Penile Malignancy

Abstract Introduction Partial penectomies (PP) and total penectomies (TP) are both performed for penile cancer in the United States. Compared to TP, PP is performed more frequently to preserve functional urinary outcomes. To date TP and PP outcomes have not been compared, in this study we compared clinical characteristics and post-operative outcomes between TP and PP conducted between 2006–2016. Objective We conducted a retrospective review of penile cancer patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for the years 2010–2016 using international classification of diseases clinical modification (ICD-CM) ninth revision codes. A total of 260 patients, 67 TP and 193 PP patients, were included. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of penile cancer patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for the years 2010–2016 using international classification of diseases clinical modification (ICD-CM) ninth revision codes. A total of 260 patients, 67 TP and 193 PP patients, were included. Results Partial penectomy patients were less likely to be transferred patients (7.3% vs 20.9%, p=0.002), less likely to be suffering from diabetes (25.9% vs 40.3%, p=0.026), and were more likely to have preoperative laboratory values within normal limits. TP was associated with increased preoperative white blood cell count x109, preoperative white blood cell count &amp;gt; 7.5x109 (p&amp;lt;0.001), preoperative hematocrit (p&amp;lt;0.001). PP patients were, in contrast, shown to have higher pre-operative creatinine levels (p=.037) and lower platelet levels than TP patients (p=.045). PP patients had shorter operation times (78.8 vs 145.5 min, p&amp;lt;0.001). PP patients also had decreased levels of inpatient stay length (1.67 vs 4.31, p&amp;lt;0.001), any 30-day post-surgery complication (7% vs 31%, p&amp;lt;0.001), deep incisional surgical site infection (0.5% vs 6% p=0.017), wound disruption (0.5% vs 6.0%p=0.017), intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (1.6% vs 7.5%, p=0.029), and sepsis (0.5% vs 7.5%, p=0.005), when compared to patients who underwent TP. TP patients displayed a significantly greater number of concurrent surgical procedures (p&amp;lt;0.001), when compared to PP patients. There was no information on urinary, sexual, and erectile outcomes in the database. Conclusions PP is associated with fewer post-operative complications, shorter surgeries, shorter hospital stays, and fewer concurrent surgical procedures. Total penectomy is associated with a greater proportion of patients suffering from comorbid conditions, suggesting that TP patients are at higher risk for post-surgical complications and longer hospital stays. There is a gap in reported data pertaining to post-operative sexual function and erectile outcomes for PP at a national level. Disclosure No.