Pelvic Relapse-free Survival Research Articles

Early clinical outcomes of hybrid brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: making adverse situations in a favorable scenario.

PurposeTo investigate the feasibility and early clinical outcomes of combined intra-cavitary (IC) and interstitial (IS) image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) as curative and definitive treatment of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).Material and methodsData from medical records of all consecutive patients with histologically proven cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 stage IB-IV), treated by brachytherapy after CCRT at our institution between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed.ResultsOne hundred and forty-two patients with LACC FIGO 2018 stages (IB: 20.4%, II: 31.7%, III: 45.8%, IV: 2.1%) underwent brachytherapy at our institution, out of which 53.5% underwent combined brachytherapy technique (IC/IS). Median number of implanted catheters was 3 (range, 1-6 catheters). None of the 142 patients required invasive hemorrhage management. With a median follow-up of 21.6 (95% CI [confidence interval]: 19.1-23.5%) months, local relapse was observed in nine patients (6.3%), with four showing persistent and progressive disease. The estimated 2-year local and pelvic relapse-free survival were 92% (95% CI: 84-96%) and 90% (95% CI: 83-94%), respectively. The estimated 2-year disease-free survival for the entire population was 80% (95% CI: 71-87%). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate for the entire population was 92% (95% CI: 84-96%). Acute toxicity G3 was reported in two (1.4%) patients. High-grade late toxicity (grade 3) was reported in 9 (6.3%) patients.ConclusionsCombined IC/IS brachytherapy for LACC allows for recommended doses to achieve local control even in large tumors after CCRT improving target volume coverage, with low rates of acute morbidity. Hybrid brachytherapy technique (IC/IS) is essential to have a favorable scenario at the time of brachytherapy to correctly treat locally advanced cervical cancer patients.

Lessons from radiochemotherapy and modern image-guided adaptive brachytherapy followed by hysterectomy

PurposeTo analyze the clinical outcomes and the safety of radiochemotherapy (RCT) and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) and to evaluate the impact of hysterectomy (HT) as completion of treatment for cervical cancer. Methods and materials145 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were treated at our institution. Patients underwent RCT and IGABT, then hysterectomy (HT) as completion of treatment was performed, with the exception of patients with surgical contraindications, para aortic metastatic disease or patients who refused surgery. Clinical outcomes and morbidity were retrospectively reviewed in both groups. Local relapse free survival (LRFS), pelvic relapse free survival (PRFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. ResultsCompletion HT was performed in 90 (62.1%) patients. Complete histological response and microscopic disease were found in 77 patients (85.6%). Local relapse was observed in 14 patients (9.6%) without differences between completion HT group and the definitive RCT and IGABT group (Odds Ratio OR = 1.73 [0.57–5.23], p = 0.33). The estimated 3-year LRFS and PRFS for the entire population were respectively 90% [84%–94%] and 93% [87%–96%], with no significant differences between them (respectively Hazard Ratio HR = 0.57 [0.20–1.64], p = 0.30 and HR = 0.37 [0.10–1.31], p = 0.12). The estimated 3-year OS rate for the whole population was 84% [75%–91%] with no significant differences between groups (HR = 0.81 [0.32–2.06], p = 0.65). Regarding morbidity, grade ≥ 2 vaginal toxicity was more frequent in the definitive RCT and IGABT group (43.6% vs 26.7%, p = 0.04). All grade 4 toxicity events were reported in the completion HT group. ConclusionsDue to high severe toxicity, RCT and IGABT with dose escalation followed by completion hysterectomy don't seem compatible. No benefit and increased severe late morbidity were observed. Combined intracavitary/interstitial technique is mandatory in large target volume at brachytherapy.

The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study

AimsNode-positive bladder cancer (NPBC) carries a poor prognosis and has traditionally been treated palliatively. However, surgical series suggest that a subset of NPBC patients can achieve long-term control after cystectomy and lymph node dissection. There is little published data regarding the use of radiotherapy to treat NPBC patients. This is in part due to concerns regarding the toxicity of whole-pelvis radiotherapy using conventional techniques. We hypothesised that, using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the pelvic nodes and bladder could be treated within a radical treatment volume with acceptable toxicity profiles. Materials and methodsThe Intensity-modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) trial was a phase II single-centre prospective study designed to assess the feasibility of delivering IMRT to treat the bladder and pelvic nodes in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative bladder cancer (NNBC). The primary end point was meeting predetermined dose constraints. Secondary end points included acute and late toxicity, pelvic relapse-free survival and overall survival. ResultsIn total, 38 patients were recruited and treated between June 2009 and November 2012; 22/38 (58%) had NPBC; 31/38 (81.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 18/38 (47%) received concurrent chemotherapy; 37/38 (97%) patients had radiotherapy planned as per protocol. Grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary acute toxicity rates were 5.4 and 20.6%, respectively. At 1 year, the grade 3 late toxicity rate was 5%; 1-, 2- and 5-year pelvic relapse-free survival rates were 55, 37 and 26%, respectively. The median overall survival was 1.9 years (95% confidence interval 1.1–3.8) with 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival rates of 68, 50 and 34%, respectively. ConclusionDelivering IMRT to the bladder and pelvic nodes in NPBC and high-risk NNBC is feasible, with low toxicity and low pelvic nodal recurrence rates. Long-term control seems to be achievable in a subset of patients. However, relapse patterns suggest that strategies targeting both local recurrence and the development of distant metastases are required to improve patient outcomes.

Textural features of cervical cancers on FDG-PET/CT associate with survival and local relapse in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 142 patients with stage IB–IIIB cervical cancer who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT before external beam radiotherapy plus intracavitary brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. The patients were divided into training and validation cohorts to confirm the reliability of predictors for recurrence. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed and a Cox regression model was used to examine the effects of variables on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and pelvic relapse-free survival (PRFS). High gray-level run emphasis (HGRE) derived from gray-level run-length matrix most accurately and consistently predicted the presence of pelvic residual or recurrent tumors for both cohorts. In multivariate analysis, stages IIIA–IIIB (P = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] = 4.07) and a low HGRE (P < 0.0001, HR = 4.34) were prognostic factors for low OS, whereas a low HGRE (P = 0.001, HR = 2.86) and nonsquamous cell histology (P = 0.003, HR = 2.76) were prognostic factors for inferior PFS. The nonsquamous cell histology (P < 0.0001, HR = 9.19) and a low HGRE (P = 0.001, HR = 4.69) were predictors for low PRFS. In cervical cancer patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy, pretreatment textural features on 18F-FDG-PET/CT can supplement the prognostic information.

Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer was introduced to improve quality of life after treatment. Sparing the pelvic autonomic nerves reduces bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. The Leiden nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) was modified to the Swift procedure, the latter being more radical regarding the sacrouterine and parametrial resection. We investigate whether nerve-sparing surgery has comparable oncological outcomes as the conventional radical hysterectomy (CRH). Concurrently, we investigate whether there is a difference regarding the oncological outcomes of the 2 nerve-sparing techniques. This is a single-center, observational prospective cohort study analyzing oncological outcomes in women undergoing CRH (1994-1999), LNSRH (2001-2005), or Swift procedure (2006-2010) for early stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IA2-IIA). Three hundred sixty-three patients (124 CRH, 122 LNSRH, and 117 Swift) were included. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2 or higher (P = 0.005) was significantly more prevalent in the CRH cohort. The 5-year pelvic relapse-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the 3 cohorts (P = 0.116). Regarding the nerve-sparing cohorts, the Swift cohort showed a significant better 5-year overall survival (87.2%) compared with the LNSRH cohort (78.8%) (P = 0.04). In the LNSRH cohort, resection planes less than 5 mm free and need for adjuvant therapy were significantly higher than in the Swift cohort (P = 0.026 and 0.046, respectively). The nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy shows a similar oncological outcome compared with the CRH. The more radical Swift version of nerve-sparing techniques is preferable to the former LNSRH procedure.

The Cervix Cancer Research Network: A Global Outreach Effort on Behalf of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup

The Cervix Cancer Research Network: A Global Outreach Effort on Behalf of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup

Lack of the Dose-Rate Effect of 192Ir Source Activity on Pelvic Control and Late Complications After High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer

This study aimed to assess the dose-rate effect of (192)Ir source activity on pelvic control and late complications following high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRICB) for cervical cancer patients. Two hundred and twelve patients were enrolled in this study. They were treated with external beam radiotherapy to the pelvis, after which HDRICB was performed using (192)Ir remote after-loading at 1-week intervals for 4 or 5 sessions. Source activity was defined as the average of source activity in each HDRICB session. Dose-rate effect was analyzed after stratification of stage and biologically effective dose (BED). The 5-year pelvic relapse-free survival was 88% for all patients. Forty-two patients developed late rectal complications (13 grade 1, 23 grade 2, 6 grade 3-4). Twenty-seven patients had grade 2 and higher late bladder complications (14 grade 2, 13 grade 3-4). There was no dose-rate effect on pelvic control or complications when source activity was stratified. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a high risk of grade 2 and higher rectal sequelae in patients whose rectal BED >or= 110 Gy(3) (p = 0.039, hazard ratio 2.05). The high risk factors for grade 2 and higher bladder complications were a bladder BED >or= 100 Gy(3) (p = 0.03, hazard ratio 4.37). This study demonstrated no dose-rate effect of (192)Ir source in HDRICB for cervical cancer in terms of pelvic control or radiation injuries. Careful monitoring of the BED values for rectum and bladder is a scrutinizing factor for minimizing late sequelae.

Negative Prognostic Impact of the Coexpression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and c-erbB-2 in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Objective: The objective was to determine the impact of the coexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and tumor marker c-erbB-2 on disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic relapse-free survival (PRFS) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: The expression of EGFR and c-erbB-2 was assessed by immunohistochemistry, which was centralized and blinded to outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the impact of EGFR and c-erbB-2 on DFS and PRFS. Results: 170 patients with LACC were included and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. 25 (15%) biopsies were considered EGFR and c-erbB-2 positive; 100 (59%) were either EGFR or c-erbB-2 positive, and 45 (26%) were EGFR and c-erbB-2 negative. The 3- and 5-year DFS was 39% each for EGFR- and c-erbB-2-positive patients, 54 and 49%, respectively, for EGFR- or c-erbB-2-positive patients, and 76 and 72%, respectively, for EGFR- and c-erbB-2-negative patients (p = 0.006). EGFR- and c-erbB-2-positive tumors were significantly associated with a decrease in PRFS (hazard ratio, HR, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.44–11.05, p = 0.007), and DFS (HR 2.9; 95% CI, 1.26–6.66, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with LACC coexpressing EGFR and c-erbB-2, and treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, had a worse clinical prognosis with shorter DFS and PRFS.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: Analysis of a single institutional 10-year experience

16056 Background: The purpose of this study was to report the feasibility and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for the locally advanced cervical cancer in our institute. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 147 patients (stage Ib: 9, II: 82, III: 80, and IVa: 7) with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated with CCRT. Cisplatin (20mg/m2/day) was administered for 5 days every 3 weeks for a median of three courses (range: 1–5 courses) during radiotherapy (RT). The patients with paraaortic and/or common iliac lymphadenopathy were excluded. RT consisted of pelvic external beam RT (EBRT) with 40Gy/20 fractions followed by high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 18Gy/3 fractions and pelvic EBRT with 10Gy/5 fractions using a midline block. Late complications were graded by the RTOG/EORTC criteria. Results: The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pelvic relapse-free survival were 78.5%, 70.7%, and 78.0%, respectively. The 5-year OS by the disease stage was as follows: stage Ib 100%, II 82.0%, III 62.3%, and IVa 35.7%. Multivariate analysis identified pelvic lymphadenopathy, tumor diameter &gt; 7cm, and pretreatment hemoglobin &lt; 9.0g/dl as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS. Only one patient suffered from grade 3 enterocolitis, but no grade 4 complication developed. Conclusions: Our experience suggests that CCRT using HDR-BT for locally advanced cervical cancer could achieve favorable local control without suffering from severe late complications. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Concurrent weekly cisplatin plus external beam radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer: A control cohort comparison with radiation alone on treatment outcome and complications

To test, though a control-cohort study, the hypothesis that concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using weekly cisplatin, plus high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRICB) is superior to radiation (RT) alone in patients with advanced cervical cancer. A total of 171 patients with Stage IIB-III cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. Seventy patients were treated with CCRT and the results were compared with those of 101 patients who had been treated with RT using the same protocol at an early period. RT consisted of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole pelvis, followed by a 12.6-Gy boost to the parametrium. Four courses of HDRICB using 6.0 Gy to Point A were performed. Chemotherapy consisted of weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) for 5-6 cycles. The 4-year actuarial survival was 74% for the CCRT group and 68% for the RT group (p = 0.60). The 4-year pelvic relapse-free survival was 87% for the CCRT group and 85% for the RT group (p = 0.37). The 4-year distant metastases-free survival was 75% for the CCRT group and 76% for the RT group (p = 0.44). The cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal and genitourinary injuries of grade 3 or above was 14.3% for the CCRT group and 7.9% for the RT group (p = 0.19). This study did not show a survival benefit of CCRT with weekly cisplatin and HDRICB for Stage II-III cervical cancer, nor did it demonstrate a significant increase of late complications when comparing with RT alone.