Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Research Articles

Impact of pelvic anteversion on spinopelvic alignment in an asymptomatic population: a dynamic perspective of standing and sitting

BACKGROUND CONTEXTA subgroup of patients with pelvic anteversion can present with an unusually large degree of lumbar lordosis (LL), a highly sloped sacrum, and a relatively small pelvic incidence (PI). Prior to lumbar surgery, it can be important to consider such unique sagittal alignment. However, until now, there has been a lack of a predictive model considering different pelvic alignments. Furthermore, the dynamic characteristics of an anteverted pelvis (AP) subgroup have also been unclear. PURPOSETo build linear predictive formulas for LL that take pelvic anteversion into consideration and to explore the dynamic characteristics of an AP subgroup. STUDY DESIGNMonocentric, cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLEFive hundred and sixty-five asymptomatic Chinese men and women between the ages of 18 and 80 years. OUTCOME MEASURESSagittal parameters including LL, lumbar lordosis minus thoracic kyphosis (LL-TK), PI, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), sacral slope (SS), sacral slope divided by pelvic incidence (SS/PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and T1 (first thoracic vertebra) pelvic angle (TPA) were measured on whole spine radiographs obtained with participants in standing and sitting positions. METHODSAll participants underwent radiography in the standing position; 235 of them underwent additional radiography in the sitting position to allow measurement of sagittal parameters. The participants with pelvic anteversion were placed in an AP (anteverted pelvis) group. Sagittal parameters were compared between the AP group and the non-AP group, and predictive formulas for LL based on PI were created in both groups. In addition, changes in sagittal parameters from standing to sitting were compared in the AP group and a PI-matched control group. RESULTSOf the 565 participants, 171 (30.3%) had pelvic anteversion. In comparison with the non-AP group, the AP group presented with larger LL, a larger SS, and a smaller PT, with relatively small PI. The predictive formulas for LL were LL=0.60° × PI+21.60° (R2=0.268; p<.001) in the whole cohort, LL=0. 83×PI+18.75° (R2=0.427; p<.001) in AP group, and LL=0.79°×PI+9.66° (R2=0.451; p<.001) in the non-AP group. In moving from standing to sitting, the AP group presented with a larger decrease in SS and LL compared with the control group, indicating different patterns of spinopelvic motion. CONCLUSIONSIn the cohort examined, 30.3% present with pelvic anteversion. Those with AP present with unique characteristics of spinopelvic alignment. In moving from standing to sitting, they exhibit different patterns of spinopelvic motion. We found that identifying the degree of anteversion in each person improves the accuracy of linear models for predicting the degree of LL, which in turn can make plans for spine surgery more accurate.

Incidence and Risk Factors of the Caudal Screw Loosening after Pelvic Fixation for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to assess the factors affecting caudal screw loosening after spinopelvic fixation for adult patients with spinal deformity. This meta-analysis calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) using Review Manager ver. 5.3 (RevMan; Cochrane, London, UK). The loosening group was older than the control group (WMD, 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-3.87; p=0.01). The S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) could prevent the caudal screw from loosening (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.94; p=0.03). However, gender distribution (p=0.36), the number of fusion segments (p=0.24), rod breakage (p=0.97), T-score (p=0.10), and proximal junctional kyphosis (p=0.75) demonstrated no difference. Preoperatively, only pelvic incidence (PI) in the loosening group was higher (WMD, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.71-7.45; p<0.01), while thoracic kyphosis (p=0.09), lumbar lordosis (LL) (p=0.69), pelvic tilt (PT) (p=0.31), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) (p=0.35), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p=0.27), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) demonstrated no difference (p=0.10). PI-LL (WMD, 6.05; 95% CI, 0.96-11.14; p=0.02), PT (WMD, 4.12; 95% CI, 0.99-7.26; p=0.01), TPA (WMD, 4.72; 95% CI, 2.35-7.09; p<0.01), and SVA (WMD, 13.35; 95% CI, 2.83-3.87; p=0.001) were higher in the screw loosening group immediately postoperatively. However, TK (p=0.24) and LL (p=0.44) demonstrated no difference. TPA (WMD, 8.38; 95% CI, 3.30-13.47; p<0.01), PT (WMD, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.47-10.55; p=0.01), and SVA (WMD, 23.13; 95% CI, 12.06-34.21; p<0.01) were higher in the screw loosening group at the final follow-up. However, PI-LL (p=0.17) demonstrated no significant difference. Elderly individuals were more susceptible to the caudal screw loosening, and the S2AI screw might better reduce the caudal screw loosening rate than the iliac screws. The lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment should be reconstructed properly to prevent the caudal screw from loosening. Measures to block sagittal alignment deterioration could also prevent the caudal screw from loosening.

Sagittal alignment of diverse mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity surgery.

To compare the sagittal alignment of patients with diverse mechanical complications (MCs) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with that of patients without MCs. A total of 371 patients who underwent ASD surgery were enrolled. The sagittal spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively and at the 6-month and last follow-up, and the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score was calculated. The subjects were divided into non-MC and MCs groups, and the MCs group was further divided into rod fracture (RF), screw breakage (SB), screw dislodgement (SD) and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) subgroups. Preoperatively, the RF group had greater thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) and relative upper lumbar lordosis (RULL); the SB group had the largest pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL); the SD group had the least global sagittal imbalance; and the PJK group had the highest thoracic kyphosis (TK), TLK and RULL. At the last follow-up, the RF and SB groups featured a large PI minus LL (PI-LL), while the PJK group featured a prominent TK; all the MCs subgroups had sagittal malalignment and a higher GAP score, and the SB group had the most severe cases. Logistic regressions showed that the relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA) score was correlated with RF, SB and SD, while the RSA and age scores were associated with PJK. Each patient with MCs had individual characteristics in the sagittal plane following ASD surgery, which may be helpful to understand the pathophysiology of poor sagittal alignment with its subsequent MCs and guide an eventual revision strategy.

Mid-Term Results of Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch

BackgroundRecent literature suggests that sagittal imbalance is a risk factor for adjacent segment disease (ASD) following fusion surgery. This study explored the influence of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch on the mid-term results and reoperation rate after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). MethodsThe participants of this study included 253 patients (80 men and 173 women; mean age 68.2 years) who underwent L4-5 single-segment PLIF. Preoperative PI-LL mismatch was defined as a PI-LL of 30° or greater. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL mismatch group; group M, Control group; group C), and the clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters were compared. ResultsOf the 253 cases, 25 were classified in group M and 228 in group C. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at five years postoperatively was 23.0±3.6 in group M and 23.5±5.1 in group C, and the recovery rate was 66.2±32.6% in group M and 64.6±21.4% in group C and there was no significant difference in the recovery rate between the two groups. All radiographic parameters except SS were significantly worse in group M. One patient (4.3%) in Group M and 18 patients (7.8%) in Group C required revision surgery at 2.4 years (range 0.0–5.0) and there was no significant difference in the revision rate between the two groups. ConclusionsThe mid-term results of L4-5 single-level PLIF were compared with and without PI-LL mismatch, with the threshold defined as 30°; however, there were no significant differences in both the JOA recovery and reoperation rates between the two groups.

Correlation analysis of surgical outcomes and spino-pelvic parameters in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

The study aims to analyze factors that affect the postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients and explore the appropriate pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) value for Chinese DLS patients. DLS patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. General information, spino-pelvic parameters, and HRQOL were collected. Correlation analysis was used to explore the spino-pelvic parameters that affect the postoperative HRQOL. Thresholds of each parameter were obtained using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Regardless of the effect of age, DLS patients were classified into three groups according to the SRS-Schwab classification: group 0 means PI-LL < 10°, group+means PI-LL = 10-20°, and group ++ means PI-LL > 20°. Postoperative HRQOL was analyzed using variance methods. The ROC curve was used to measure the appropriate PI-LL threshold. When considering the effect of age, the patients with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) < 75% percentile were considered to have a satisfactory clinical outcome, which was drawn to an equation between PI-LL, age, and PI by multiple linear regression equation. A total of 71 patients were included. Compared with the control group, there were significant differences in both postoperative ODI and Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS-22) scores when the postoperative Cobb angle ≤11°, postoperative lumbar lordosis index (LLI) > 0.8, postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≤ 5 cm, postoperative T1 pelvic angle (TPA) ≤ 16° and postoperative global tilt (GT) ≤ 22°, respectively. Regardless of the effect of age, there was a statistical difference in postoperative HRQOL between group 0 and group ++. The PI-LL threshold derived from the ROC curve was 14.4°. Compared with the PI-LL > 14° group, the PI-LL ≤ 14° group achieved a lower postoperative ODI score and a higher postoperative SRS-22 score. Considering the influence of age, the equation for ideal PI-LL was PI-LL = 0.52age + 0.38PI-39.4 (R = 0.509, p = 0.001). PI-LL was an important parameter that affects the postoperative HRQOL of DLS patients. Sufficient LL should be restored during the operation (LL ≥ PI-14°). The appropriate PI-LL value was affected by age. Smaller LL needed to be restored as the age increased.

Correction of Spinal Sagittal Alignment after Posterior Lumbar Decompression: Does Severity of Central Canal Stenosis Matter?

This study adopted a retrospective study design. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of central canal stenosis severity on surgical outcomes and lumbar sagittal correction after lumbar decompression. Studies have evaluated sagittal correction in patients with central canal stenosis after lumbar decompression and the association of stenosis severity with worse preoperative sagittal alignment. However, none have evaluated the impact of spinal stenosis severity on sagittal correction. Patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression (PLD) of ≤4 levels were divided into severe and non-severe central canal stenosis groups based on the Lee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading system. Patients without preoperative MRI or inadequate visualization on radiographs were excluded. Surgical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and sagittal measurements were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the predictors of pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL). Of the 142 patients included, 39 had severe stenosis, and 103 had non-severe stenosis. The mean follow-up duration for the cohort was 4.72 months. Patients with severe stenosis were older, had higher comorbidity indices and levels decompressed, and longer lengths of stay and operative times (p <0.001). Although those with severe stenosis had lower lordosis, lower SS, and higher PI-LL mismatch preoperatively, no differences in Delta LL, SS, PT, or PI-LL were observed between the two groups (p >0.05). On multivariate regression, severe stenosis was a significant predictor of a lower preoperative LL (estimate=-5.243, p =0.045) and a higher preoperative PI-LL mismatch (estimate=6.192, p =0.039). No differences in surgical or clinical outcomes were observed (p >0.05). Severe central lumbar stenosis was associated with greater spinopelvic mismatch preoperatively. Sagittal balance improved in both patients with severe and non-severe stenosis after PLD to a similar degree, with differences in sagittal parameters remaining after surgery. We also found no differences in postoperative outcomes associated with stenosis severity.

Validation of age-adjusted pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index for assessing adjacent-segment disease after short-level lumbar fusion surgery: minimum 5 years of follow-up.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of sagittal alignment according to age-adjusted pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) and lordosis distribution index (LDI) on the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion surgery. This study retrospectively reviewed 234 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar fusion surgery. Demographic and radiographic (preoperative and 3-month postoperative) data were collected and compared between ASD and non-ASD groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate adjusted associations between potential variables and ASD development. A subanalysis was further conducted to assess their relationships in the range of different PI values. With a mean follow-up duration of 70.6 months (range 60-121 months), 118 patients (50.4%) were diagnosed as having cranial radiological ASD. Univariate analyses showed that older age, 2-level fusion, worse preoperative pelvic tilt and LL, lower pre- and postoperative LDI, and more improvement in sagittal vertical axis were significantly correlated with the occurrence of ASD. No significant differences in the PI-LL and age-adjusted PI-LL (offset) were detected between ASD and non-ASD groups. Multivariate analysis identified postoperative LDI (OR 0.971, 95% CI 0.953-0.989, p = 0.002); 2-level fusion (OR 3.477, 95% CI 1.964-6.157, p < 0.001); and improvement of sagittal vertical axis (OR 0.992, 95% CI 0.985-0.998, p = 0.039) as the independent variables for predicting the occurrence of ASD. When stratified by PI, LDI was identified as an independent risk factor in the groups with low and average PI. Lower segmental lordosis (OR 0.841, 95% CI 0.742-0.954, p = 0.007) could significantly increase the incidence of ASD in the patients with high LDI. Age-adjusted PI-LL may have limited ability to predict the development of ASD. LDI could exert an important effect on diagnosing the occurrence of ASD in the cases with low and average PI, but segmental lordosis was a more significant risk factor than LDI in individuals with high PI.

Introduction of a New Radiographic Parameter to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: UIVPTA (Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra-Pelvic Tilt Angle).

To introduce a new sagittal parameter, uppermost instrumented vertebra-pelvic tilt angle (UIVPTA), and to determine the effects on the proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Patients ≥ 60 years with ASD who underwent low thoracic spine to pelvis fusion with a minimum of 2-years of follow-up were included in this study. Two groups were created according to PJK development. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between PJK and non-PJK groups to identify the risk factors for PJK. Cutoff value of UIVPTA for PJK development was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve according to different pelvic incidence groups. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors to affect UIVPTA. One hundred fifity-one patients were included in this study. There were 135 female patients (89.4%). Mean age was 70.5 years. PJK developed in 65 patients (43.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI) minus lumbar lordosis (LL) (PI-LL) target and lower UIVPTA were independent risk factors for PJK. The cutoff value of UIVPTA for PJK development was calculated as 4.0° in patients with PI less than 45°, 9.5° in patients with PI between 45° and 60°, and 13.0° in patients with PI greater than 60°. Linear regression analysis showed that UIVPTA was positively affected by postoperative values of LL (coefficient = 0.505), PI-LL (coefficient = 0.674), and pelvic tilt (coefficient = 0.286). Optimal correction within the age-adjusted PI-LL combined with keeping UIVPTA within optimal range is suggested for the prevention of PJK.

Spinopelvic Parameters in the Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Patients Submitted to Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery – A Prospective Study

Abstract Objectives The relevance of spinopelvic parameters in the patients' clinical and functional outcomes has been widely studied in long spinal fusion. Yet, the importance of the spinopelvic parameters in short-segment fusion surgeries needs further investigation. We analyzed the spinopelvic parameters and surgical outcomes of patients undergoing short-segment lumbar interbody fusion. Materials and Methods An observational, prospective study was conducted between January and June 2021. We selected 25 patients with lumbar stenosis, with or without concomitant spondylolisthesis, undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Variables related to the patient, diagnosis, and surgery were collected. The clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale for low-back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The surgical outcomes and spinopelvic parameters were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Results There was a significant clinical and functional improvement after surgery (p &lt; 0.001), with a mean ODI decrease of 63.6%. The variables of obesity, concomitant spondylolisthesis, absence of osteotomy, and two-level fusion were all associated with lower levels of improvement after surgery (p &lt; 0.05). Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) was the only parameter that significantly changed regarding the pre- and postoperative periods (p &lt; 0.05). Before surgery, PI-LL &lt; −10° correlates with less low-back pain after surgery (r = 0.435; p &lt; 0.05). Postoperatively, no correlation was found between surgical outcomes and all the spinopelvic parameters analyzed. Conclusions The clinical and functional outcomes significantly improved with the surgical intervention but did not correlate with the change in spinopelvic parameters. Patients with preoperative PI-LL &lt; −10° seem to benefit the most from surgery, showing greater improvement in back pain.

Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

While reimbursement is centered on 90-day outcomes, many patients may still achieve optimal, long-term outcomes following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery despite transient short-term complications. Compare long-term clinical success and cost-utility between patients achieving optimal realignment and suboptimally aligned peers. Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multicenter database. ASD patients with two-year (2Y) data included. Groups were propensity score matched (PSM) for age, frailty, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and baseline deformity. Optimal radiographic criteria are defined as meeting low deformity in all three (Scoliosis Research Society) SRS-Schwab parameters or being proportioned in Global Alignment and Proportionality (GAP). Cost-per-QALY was calculated for each time point. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) adjusting for baseline disability and deformity (pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL)) were used to determine the significance of surgical details, complications, clinical outcomes, and cost-utility. A total of 930 patients were considered. Following PSM, 253 "optimal" (O) and 253 "not optimal" (NO) patients were assessed. The O group underwent more invasive procedures and had more levels fused. Analysis of complications by two years showed that the O group suffered less overall major (38% vs. 52%, p = 0.021) and major mechanical complications (12% vs. 22%, p = 0.002), and less reoperations (23% vs. 33%, p = 0.008). Adjusted analysis revealed O patients more often met MCID (minimal clinically important difference) in SF-36 PCS, SRS-22 Pain, and Appearance. Cost-utility-adjusted analysis determined that the O group generated better cost-utility by one year and maintained lower overall cost and costs per QALY (both p < 0.001) at two years. Fewer late complications (mechanical and reoperations) are seen in optimally aligned patients, leading to better long-term cost-utility overall. Therefore, the current focus on avoiding short-term complications may be counterproductive, as achieving optimal surgical correction is critical for long-term success.

How Do Spinal Parameters Change in Patients Who Have Improvement of Low Back Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Propensity Score–Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundMany studies have demonstrated that low back pain (LBP) improves after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the mechanism underlying this improvement remains unclear. We aimed to investigate changes in the spinal parameters of patients who had LBP improvement after THA to elucidate the mechanism of LBP improvement. MethodsWe included 261 patients who underwent primary THA between December 2015 and June 2021 and had a preoperative visual analog scale score of ≥ 2 for LBP. The patients were classified into the LBP-improved or LBP-continued groups based on the visual analog scale for LBP at 1 year after THA. Preoperative and postoperative changes in the coronal and sagittal spinal parameters were compared between the 2 groups after propensity score matching for age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative spinal parameters. ResultsA total of 161 patients (61.7%) were classified into the LBP-improved group. After 85 patients in both groups were matched, the LBP-improved group showed significant differences in spinal parameter changes, which were a higher lumbar lordosis (LL) (P = .04) and lower sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (P = .02) and pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL (PI-LL) (P = .01) postoperatively, whereas the LBP-continued group showed worsened changes in LL and SVA and PI-LL mismatch. ConclusionPatients who had LBP improvement after THA had significant differences in spinal parameter changes in LL, SVA, and PI-LL. These spinal parameters may be the key factors in the mechanism of LBP improvement after THA.

Patient and procedural risk factors for decline in lower-extremity motor scores following adult spinal deformity surgery.

The purpose of this study was to discern factors that differentiate patients who experience postoperative lower-extremity motor function decline in the early postoperative period. Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who were enrolled in a multicenter, observational, and prospectively collected study from 2018 to 2021 at 18 spinal deformity centers in North America were queried. Eligible participants met at least one of the following radiographic and/or procedural inclusion criteria: pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) ≥ 25°, T1 pelvic angle (T1PA) ≥ 30°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥ 15 cm, thoracic scoliosis ≥ 70°, thoracolumbar scoliosis ≥ 50°, global coronal malalignment ≥ 7 cm, 3-column osteotomy, spinal fusion ≥ 12 levels, and/or age ≥ 65 years with ≥ 7 levels of instrumentation. Patients with an inflammatory or autoimmune disease and those who were incarcerated or pregnant were excluded, as were non-English speakers. Only patients with baseline and 6-week postoperative lower-extremity motor score (LEMS) were analyzed. Patient information, including demographic data, operative data, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic parameters, were collected. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were built to quantify the degree to which a patient's postoperative LEMS decline was related to demographic and clinical characteristics. In total, 205 patients (mean age 61.5 years, mean total instrumented levels 12.6, 67.3% female, 54.2% primary cases, 79.5% with pelvic fixation) were evaluated. Of these 205 patients, 32 (15.5%) experienced LEMS decline in the perioperative period. These patients were older (p = 0.0014) and had greater BMI (p = 0.0176), higher frailty scores (p = 0.047), longer operating room times (p = 0.033), and greater estimated blood loss (p < 0.0001), and they were more frequently observed to have intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) changes (p = 0.018). The deteriorated cohort had greater C7SVA at baseline (p = 0.0028) but were comparable in terms of all other radiographic parameters. No radiographic differences were seen between the groups at the 6-week visit; however, the deteriorated cohort experienced greater change in PI-LL (p < 0.0001), lumbar lordosis (p = 0.0461), C7SVA (p = 0.0004), and T1PA (p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the presence of IONM changes and each degree of negative change in T1PA conferred 3.71 (95% CI 1.01-13.42) and 1.09 (1.01-1.19) greater odds of postoperative LEMS deterioration, respectively. In this study, 15.6% of ASD patients incurred LEMS decline in the perioperative period. The magnitude of change in global sagittal alignment, specifically T1PA, was the strongest independent predictor of LEMS decline, which has implications for surgical planning, patient counseling, and clinical research.

External Validation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Calculator Utilizing a Single Institutional Experience for Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery.

Identify the external applicability of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk calculator in the setting of adult spinal deformity (ASD) and subsets of patients based on deformity and frailty status. ASD patients were isolated in our single-center database and analyzed for the shared predictive variables displayed in the NSQIP calculator. Patients were stratified by frailty (not frail <0.03, frail 0.3-0.5, severely frail >0.5), deformity [T1 pelvic angle (TPA) > 30, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) > 20], and reoperation status. Brier scores were calculated for each variable to validate the calculator's predictability in a single center's database (Quality). External validity of the calculator in our ASD patients was assessed via Hosmer-Lemeshow test, which identified whether the differences between observed and expected proportions are significant. A total of 1606 ASD patients were isolated from the Quality database (48.7 years, 63.8% women, 25.8 kg/m2); 33.4% received decompressions, and 100% received a fusion. For each subset of ASD patients, the calculator predicted lower outcome rates than what was identified in the Quality database. The calculator showed poor predictability for frail, deformed, and reoperation patients for the category "any complication" because they had Brier scores closer to 1. External validity of the calculator in each stratified patient group identified that the calculator was not valid, displaying P values >0.05. The NSQIP calculator was not a valid calculator in our single institutional database. It is unable to comment on surgical complications such as return to operating room, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and cardiac complications that are typically associated with poor patient outcomes. Physicians should not base their surgical plan solely on the NSQIP calculator but should consider multiple preoperative risk assessment tools.

A decision tree analysis to predict clinical outcome of minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with and without coexisting spondylolisthesis and scoliosis

Implementing machine learning techniques, such as decision trees, known as prediction models that use logical construction diagrams, are rarely used to predict clinical outcomes. To develop a clinical prediction rule to predict clinical outcomes in patients who undergo minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with and without coexisting spondylolisthesis and scoliosis using a decision tree model. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. This study included 331 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and were followed up for ≥2 years at 1 institution. Self-report measures: The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and low back pain (LBP)/leg pain/leg numbness visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Physiologic measures: Standing sagittal spinopelvic alignment, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging results. Low achievement in clinical outcomes were defined as the postoperative JOA score at the 2-year follow-up <25 points. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis and chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) were used for analysis. The CHAID model for JOA score <25 points showed spontaneous numbness/pain as the first decision node. For the presence of spontaneous numbness/pain, sagittal vertical axis ≥70 mm was selected as the second decision node. Then lateral wedging, ≥6° and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) ≥30° followed as the third decision node. For the absence of spontaneous numbness/pain, sex and lateral olisthesis, ≥3mm and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system score were selected as the second and third decision nodes. The sensitivity, specificity, and the positive predictive value of this CHAID model was 65.1, 69.8, and 64.7% respectively. The CHAID model incorporating basic information and functional and radiologic factors is useful for predicting surgical outcomes.

Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Grade Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Stabilization with Rigid Percutaneous Pedicle Screws.

The armamentarium of surgical treatment options for lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS) includes decompression alone, stabilization with interlaminar devices, or instrumented fusion, through open or minimally invasive approaches. Despite its safe profuse use in distinctive lumbar spine disorders, using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) alone to stabilize LS has never been described before. We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data, enrolling 24 patients with LS and scrutinizing clinical and radiological outcomes. A statistically significant decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) scores (p<0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (p<0.001) was observed, as was a reduction in the intake of acetaminophen after surgery (p=0.022). In the long-term, PPS effectively reduced the index-level range of motion (p<0.001), reduced preoperative slippage (p=0.03), and maintained foraminal height, thus accounting for the positive clinical outcomes. It induced a significant segmental kyphotic effect (p<0.001) that was compensated for by a favorable increase in the pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) index (0.028).

Clinical impact of short limited lumbar fusion for adult spinal deformity with postural and radiological abnormalities

Extensive surgical spinopelvic fusion for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) to achieve optimal radiological parameters should be avoided. The aim of this study was to review clinical and imaging findings in patients with ASD with postural and radiological abnormalities who underwent a novel three-level limited lumbar fusion as two-stage surgery in an attempt to propose a better tolerated alternative to spinopelvic long fusion to the pelvis. The subjects were 26 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Cobb angle, C7 sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic incidence (PI) minus lumbar lordosis (LL) were significantly improved after surgery and maintained at follow-up. Most radiological parameters were corrected with lateral interbody fusion (LIF) as the initial surgery, and few with posterior fusion. PI-LL remained high after limited lumbar fusion, but scores on patient-based questionnaires and sagittal and coronal tilt in gait analysis improved. In cases with postoperative progression of proximal junctional kyphosis (11.5%), residual L1–L2 local kyphosis after LIF was the most significant radiological feature. In some cases of ASD with postural abnormalities, short limited lumbar fusion gives sufficient postoperative clinical improvement with preservation of spinal mobility and activities of daily living. The range of fixation should be determined based on radiological parameters after LIF to avoid postoperative complications.

Global realignment after posterior vertebral column resection in severe thoracolumbar post-tubercular kyphosis: correlation with patient-reported outcomes.

To investigate spinal realignment in patients with severe post-tubercular kyphosis (PTK) who underwent posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) and its correlation with patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Eighty-two patients were included in this study. Spinopelvic parameters (focal scoliosis (FS), coronal balance (CB), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), focal kyphosis (FK), C2-7 lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL)) and PROs (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)) were analyzed. The correlation between spinopelvic parameters and PROs was evaluated. FK, FS, CL, TK, LL, and PI-LL significantly changed after surgery. FK decreased from pre-operative 108.5 ± 16.4° to 31.8 ± 4.5° at threemonths after surgery and increased to 38.7 ± 6.6° at final follow-up (P < 0.001). FS decreased from pre-operative 20.9 ± 2.2° to 5.1 ± 2.2° at final follow-up (P < 0.001). CL decreased from pre-operative 7.2 ± 7.3° to 3.3 ± 8.3° at final follow-up (P = 0.002). TK improved from pre-operative - 5.6 ± 7.1° to 12.9 ± 8.2° at final follow-up (P < 0.001). LL decreased from pre-operative 75.5 ± 12.6° to 45.5 ± 7.9° at final follow-up (P < 0.001). PI-LL improved from pre-operative - 24.8 ± 13.4° to 4.8 ± 9.9° at final follow-up (P < 0.001). The improvement of PROs was found to be significantly correlated with the variations of FK, CL, TK, LL, and PI-LL. The multiple regression analysis revealed that FK was an independent predictor for the improvement of VAS and ODI. PVCR is effective in treating severe PTK, which can significantly improve patients' clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine surgeons should pay more attention to reducing the residual kyphosis.

Radiographic and MRI evidence of indirect neural decompression after the anterior column realignment procedure for adult spinal deformity.

The anterior column realignment (ACR) procedure, which consists of sectioning the anterior longitudinal ligament/annulus and placing a hyperlordotic interbody cage, has emerged as a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for achieving aggressive segmental lordosis enhancement to address adult spinal deformity (ASD). Although accumulated evidence has revealed indirect neural decompression after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), whether ACR serves equally well for neural decompression remains to be proven. The current study intended to clarify this ambiguous issue. A series of 36 ASD patients with spinopelvic mismatch, defined as pelvic incidence (PI) minus lumbar lordosis (LL) > 10°, underwent a combination of ACR, LLIF, and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation. This "MIS triad" procedure was applied over short segments with mean fusion length of 3.3 levels, and most patients underwent single-level ACR. The authors analyzed full-length standing radiographs, CT and MRI scans, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores in patients with minimum 1 year of follow-up (mean [range] 20.3 [12-39] months). Compared with the preoperative values, the radiographic and MRI measurements of the latest postoperative studies changed as follows. Segmental disc angle more than quadrupled at the ACR level and LL nearly doubled. MRI examinations at the ACR level revealed a significant (p < 0.0001) increase in the area of the dural sac that was accompanied by significant (p < 0.0001) decreases in area and thickness of the ligamentum flavum and in thickness of the disc bulge. The corresponding CT scans demonstrated significant (all p < 0.0001) increases in disc height to 280% of the preoperative value at the anterior edge, 224% at the middle edge, and 209% at the posterior edge, as well as in pedicle-to-pedicle distance to 122%. Mean ODI significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased from 46.3 to 26.0. The CT-based data showing vertebral column lengthening across the entire ACR segment with an increasingly greater degree anteriorly suggest that the corrective action of ACR relies on a lever mechanism, with the intact facet joints acting as the fulcrum. Whole-segment spine lengthening at the ACR level reduced the disc bulge anteriorly and the ligamentum flavum posteriorly, with eventual enlargement of the dural sac. ACR plays an important role in not only LL restoration but also stenotic spinal canal enlargement for ASD surgery.

Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system

BACKGROUNDDegenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common pathologies addressed by surgeons. Recently, data demonstrated improved outcomes with fusion in conjunction with laminectomy compared to laminectomy alone. However, given not all degenerative spondylolistheses are clinically comparable, the best treatment option may depend on multiple parameters. Specifically, the impact of spinopelvic alignment on patient reported and clinical outcomes following fusion versus decompression for grade I spondylolisthesis has yet to be explored. PURPOSEThis study assessed two-year clinical outcomes and one-year patient reported outcomes following laminectomy with concomitant fusion versus laminectomy alone for management of grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis. The present study is the first to examine the effect of spinopelvic alignment on patient-reported and clinical outcomes following decompression alone versus decompression with fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective sub-group analysis of observational, prospectively collected cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE679 patients treated with laminectomy with fusion or laminectomy alone for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and comorbid spinal stenosis performed by orthopaedic and neurosurgeons at three medical centers affiliated with a single, tertiary care center. OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome was the change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Global Physical Health (GPH), and Global Mental Health (GMH) scores at baseline and post-operatively at 4-6 and 10-12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative parameters (estimated blood loss and operative time), and two-year clinical outcomes including reoperations, duration of postoperative physical therapy, and discharge disposition. METHODSRadiographs/MRIs assessed stenosis, spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt; from this data, two cohorts were created based on pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PILL), denoted as “high” and “low” mismatch. Patients underwent either decompression or decompression with fusion; propensity score matching (PSM) and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were used to create matched cohorts of “cases” (fusion) and “controls” (decompression). Binary comparisons used McNemar test; continuous outcomes used Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Between-group comparisons of changes in PROMIS GPH and GMH scores were analyzed using mixed-effects models; analyses were conducted separately for patients with high and low pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PILL) mismatch. RESULTS49.9% of patients (339) underwent lumbar decompression with fusion, while 50.1% (340) received decompression. In the high PLL mismatch cohort at 10-12 months postoperatively, fusion-treated patients reported improved PROs, including GMH (26.61 vs. 20.75, p<0.0001) and GPH (23.61 vs. 18.13, p<0.0001). They also required fewer months of outpatient physical therapy (1.61 vs. 3.65, p<0.0001) and had lower 2-year reoperation rates (12.63% vs. 17.89%, p=0.0442) compared to decompression-only patients. In contrast, in the low PLL mismatch cohort, fusion-treated patients demonstrated worse endpoint PROs (GMH: 18.67 vs. 21.52, p<0.0001; GPH: 16.08 vs. 20.74, p<0.0001). They were also more likely to require skilled nursing/rehabilitation centers (6.86% vs. 0.98%, p=0.0412) and extended outpatient physical therapy (2.47 vs. 1.34 months, p<0.0001) and had higher 2-year reoperation rates (25.49% vs. 14.71%,p=0.0152). CONCLUSIONSLumbar laminectomy with fusion was superior to laminectomy in health–related quality of life and reoperation rate at two years postoperatively only for patients with sagittal malalignment, represented by high PILL mismatch. In contrast, the addition of fusion for patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and spinopelvic harmony (low PILL mismatch) resulted in worse quality of life outcomes and reoperation rates.

208. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and Grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A comparison of clinical and patient reported outcomes within a single health system

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine is one of the most common pathologies addressed by surgeons. Recently, high-level data demonstrated improved outcomes with fusion in conjunction with laminectomy compared to laminectomy alone. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> The present study is the first analysis to examine the effect of spinopelvic alignment on patient-reported outcomes following decompression alone versus decompression with fusion. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Subgroup analysis of observational prospective cohort study. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> A total of 679 patients with degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis and stenosis treated with laminectomy alone or laminectomy with fusion at a tertiary care insitution. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Primary outcome was the change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Global Physical Health (GPH), and Global Mental Health (GMH) scores at baseline and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months. <h3>METHODS</h3> Patients underwent laminectomy alone or laminectomy with instrumented fusion for degenerative Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. Four cohorts were created based on pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PILL): (1) fusion with PILL>10°, (2) fusion with PILL10°, and (4) decompression alone with PILL <10°. The between-group comparisons of PROMIS GPH/GMH score changes were analyzed using mixed-effects models. Analyses were conducted independently for the following: (1) unmatched cohort, (2) 1:1 propensity score matched patients (PSM), (3) coarsened exact matched (CEM) patients. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 49.9% (339) underwent lumbar decompression with fusion, while 50.1% (340) received decompression. When comparing low spinopelvic mismatch (PILL 10) patients, fusion-treated patients had improved postoperative PROs (GMH: 26.61 vs 20.75, p < 0.0001; GPH: 23.61 vs 18.13, p < 0.0001) at 10-12 months. Mixed effect modeling confirmed GPH score improvement was 5.11 (2.08 - 8.13) points higher at 10-12 months in the fusion group. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Among Grade I spondylolisthesis patients with PILL>10°, laminectomy with fusion was associated with greater improvement in physical health-related quality of life than laminectomy alone. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.