Pedigree-based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Research Articles

Optimal open nucleus breeding system for long-term genetic gain in the Pacific white shrimp using genomic selection

The open nucleus breeding system (ONBS) has been widely employed in livestock breeding and has demonstrated a desirable genetic gain compared to the traditional closed nucleus breeding system (CNBS). However, no related study and application for ONBS exist on aquatic animal breeding. The present investigation simulates the family-based ONBS with different proportions of introduced multiplier individuals used as parents of the nucleus population (NP) and CNBS schemes for the harvest body weight of the Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). The multiplier population (MP) comprised progenies from eight families with high estimated breeding value (EBV) or genomic EBV (GEBV) of NP of the previous generation. ONBS was assigned three proportions (10%, 30%, and 50%) of the introduced MP individuals. The short-term selection (G0 to G10) and long-term selection (G0 to G20) were performed for CNBS and ONBS schemes using pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) with the A relationship matrix from the pedigree or single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) with the H relationship matrix integrating SNP markers and pedigree. The genetic gain of body weight and inbreeding coefficient of NP for eight breeding schemes with CNBS_PBLUP (CP), CNBS_ssGLUP (CS), ONBS_PBLUP (OP10, OP30, OP50), and ONBS_ssGBLUP (OS10, OS30, OS50) with three proportions of the introduced MP individuals were calculated. Compared to CP, genetic gains for the three OP schemes increased by 7.68 to 11.27% after short-term selection, and by 2.51 to 5.79% after long-term selection. In comparison to CS, genetic gains for the three OS schemes increased by 8.21 to 8.96% after short-term selection, and from 4.46 to 5.87% after long-term selection. The ONBS schemes achieved higher genetic gains than the corresponding CNBS schemes whether using genomic or pedigree information. The advantage of ONBS over CNBS is reduced after long-term selection. Genetic gains for the three OS schemes increased by 9.77 to 14.06% after long-term selection compared with the corresponding OP schemes. Furthermore, no significant difference (P > 0.05) in genetic gain was revealed among the ONBS schemes after either pedigree-based or genomic selection. Inbreeding coefficients for the three OP schemes increased from 59.45 to 70.98% compared with CP, whereas inbreeding coefficients for the three OS schemes increased from 24.72 to 32.22% compared with CS. Besides, after long-term selection, inbreeding coefficients for the three OS schemes decreased from 13.13 to 14.79% compared with the corresponding OP schemes. In a nutshell, ONBS using introduced MP individuals has great promise in the selective breeding program of L. vannamei. Genomic information has more potential to improve selection response and control inbreeding level than pedigree information when applying ONBS.

Genome-assisted prediction of amoebic gill disease resistance in different populations of Atlantic salmon during field outbreak

The Atlantic salmon industry in northern Europe is experiencing increasing losses due to the amoeba Paramoeba perurans, which is the causative agent of amoebic gill disease (AGD); a disease that has a debilitating impact on fish's health and welfare. Successful implementation of genomic selection (GS) for AGD can potentially increase selection response and help reduce outbreaks in the commercial farming of Atlantic salmon. However, successful implementation of GS requires the existence of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers and quantitative trait loci (QTL). In this study, we evaluated separately the extent of LD present in six Atlantic salmon breeding populations from Mowi. We also investigated the benefit of using genomic information for selection in these populations, comprising 4 year-classes from Mowi's Norwegian population and 2 year-classes from Mowi's Irish population that was recently introgressed into the Norwegian population. The average distance between markers was 43 kb and the average LD (measured by r2) between adjacent markers was approximately 0.3 for each population. As expected, LD decreased as the physical distance between markers increased. In addition, we observed long-range LD (LD extending to several megabases) across all chromosomes and for all the populations studied. Both the heritability and the accuracy of the breeding value estimates for AGD resistance varied considerably among populations, ranging between 0.06 and 0.24, and 0.32 to 0.77, respectively. The GS models studied had overall better performance than the pedigree based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) model with respect to the accuracy of breeding values prediction, whereas no significant difference was found between the linear and nonlinear GS models. We recommend the use of genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model for the genetic evaluation of AGD resistance due to the higher computing requirements of nonlinear GS models.

Genomic prediction of fertility and calving traits in Holstein cattle based on models including epistatic genetic effects.

The goal of this study was to investigate whether the inclusion of genomic information and epistatic (additive by additive) genetic effects would increase the accuracy of predicting phenotypes adjusted for known environmental effects, reduce prediction bias and minimize the confounding between additive and additive by additive epistatic effects on fertility and calving traits in Holstein cattle. Phenotypic and genotypic records were available for 6090 cows. Eight cow traits were assessed including 56-day nonreturn rate (NRR), number of services (NS), calving to first insemination (CTFS), first insemination to conception (FSTC), gestation length (GL), calving ease (CE), stillbirth (SB) and calf size (CZ). Four scenarios were assessed for their ability to predict adjusted phenotypes, which included: (1) traditional pedigree-based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (P-BLUP) for additive genetic effects (PA); (2) P-BLUP for additive and epistatic (additive by additive) genetic effects (PAE); (3) genomic BLUP (G-BLUP) for additive genetic effects (GA); and (4) G-BLUP for additive and epistatic genetic effects (GAEn, where n = 1-3 depending on the alternative ways to construct the epistatic genomic matrix used). Constructing epistatic relationship matrix as the Hadamard product of the additive genomic relationship matrix (GAE1), which is the usual method and implicitly assumes a model that fits all pairwise interactions between markers twice and includes the interactions of the markers with themselves (dominance). Two additional constructions of the epistatic genomic relationship matrix were compared to test whether removing the double counting of interactions and the interaction of the markers with themselves (GAE2), and removing double counting of interactions between markers, but including the interaction of the markers with themselves (GAE3) would had an impact on the prediction and estimation error correlation (i.e. confounding) between additive and epistatic genetic effects. Fitting epistatic genetic effects explained up to 5.7% of the variance for NRR (GAE3), 7.7% for NS (GAE1), 11.9% for CTFS (GAE3), 11.1% for FSTC (GAE2), 25.7% for GL (GAE1), 2.3% for CE (GAE1), 14.3% for SB (GAE3) and 15.2% for CZ (GAE1). Despite a substantial proportion of variance being explained by epistatic effects for some traits, the prediction accuracies were similar or lower for GAE models compared with pedigree models and genomic models without epistatic effects. Although the prediction accuracy of direct genomic values did not change significantly between the three variations of the epistatic genetic relationship matrix used, removing the interaction of the markers with themselves reduced the confounding between additive and additive by additive epistatic effects. These results suggest that epistatic genetic effects contribute to the variance of some fertility and calving traits in Holstein cattle. However, the inclusion of epistatic genetic effects in the genomic prediction of these traits is complex and warrant further investigation.

Genomic selection models substantially improve the accuracy of genetic merit predictions for fillet yield and body weight in rainbow trout using a multi-trait model and multi-generation progeny testing

BackgroundIn aquaculture, the proportion of edible meat (FY = fillet yield) is of major economic importance, and breeding animals of superior genetic merit for this trait can improve efficiency and profitability. Achieving genetic gains for fillet yield is possible using a pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) model with direct and indirect selection. To investigate the feasibility of using genomic selection (GS) to improve FY and body weight (BW) in rainbow trout, the prediction accuracy of GS models was compared to that of PBLUP. In addition, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) for the traits. All analyses were performed using a two-trait model with FY and BW, and variance components, heritability, and genetic correlations were estimated without genomic information. The data used included 14,165 fish in the pedigree, of which 2742 and 12,890 had FY and BW phenotypic records, respectively, and 2484 had genotypes from the 57K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array.ResultsThe heritabilities were moderate, at 0.41 and 0.33 for FY and BW, respectively. Both traits were lowly but positively correlated (genetic correlation; r = 0.24), which suggests potential favourable correlated genetic gains. GS models increased prediction accuracy compared to PBLUP by up to 50% for FY and 44% for BW. Evaluations were found to be biased when validation was performed on future performances but not when it was performed on future genomic estimated breeding values.ConclusionsThe low but positive genetic correlation between fillet yield and body weight indicates that some improvement in fillet yield may be achieved through indirect selection for body weight. Genomic information increases the prediction accuracy of breeding values and is an important tool to accelerate genetic progress for fillet yield and growth in the current rainbow trout population. No significant QTL were found for either trait, indicating that both traits are polygenic, and that marker-assisted selection will not be helpful to improve these traits in this population.

Genome-wide association studies uncover genes associated with litter traits in the pig

Litter traits are critical economic variables in the pig industry as they represent a production indicator that can serve to determine sow fertility. In this study, a genome-wide association study on litter traits, including total number born (TNB), number born alive (NBA), litter birth weight (LBW), average birth weight (ABW), and piglet uniformity (PU), was carried out on two pig breeds (Yorkshire and Landrace). A total of 3 637 pigs of both breeds were genotyped using the GeneSeek GGP Porcine 50K SNP BeadChip. A mixed linear model (MLM) and fixed and random model circulating probability unification (FarmCPU) were employed in the genome-wide association studies for litter traits using combined data from the two pig breeds and data from each breed separately. Additionally, the heritability of traits was estimated using three methods—pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP), genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), and single-step best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP)—and was found to lie between 0.065 and 0.1289, 0.0478 and 0.0938, 0.0793 and 0.0935, 0.1862 and 0.2163, and 0.0327 and 0.0419 for TNB, NBA, LBW, ABW, and PU, respectively. We also compared the genomic prediction accuracies and unbiasedness for litter traits of the three BLUP models. Our results indicated that the ssGBLUP method provided higher predictive accuracies and more rational unbiasedness compared with the PBLUP and GBLUP methodologies. Furthermore, based on their possible roles, eight candidate genes (INHBA, LEPR, HDHD2, CTNND2, RNF216, HMX1, PAPPA2, and NTN1) were identified as being linked with litter traits. In the middle of the test, these genes were found to be connected with pig metabolism and ovulation rate. Our results provide the insights into the genetic architecture of litter traits in pigs, and the potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and candidate genes identified may benefit economic profits in pig-breeding industry and contribute to improve litter traits.

First single-step genomic prediction and genome-wide association for body weight in Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii)

Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii)—a species of sturgeon—has a high economic value as a source of caviar and high-quality meat products. Genomic selection (GS) has the potential to shorten generation intervals and improve genetic gain for the key target traits of a breeding program. However, it has not been applied on sturgeon. We evaluated the performance of GS in breeding value estimation and carried out genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to dissect the genetic architecture of economically vital growth trait (body weight) in Russian sturgeon. Of a total of 3430 Russian sturgeons with phenotype records, 236 were sequenced. Through 10 replicates of fivefold cross-validation, we compared the accuracy of prediction obtained from a pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP), and a weighted ssGBLUP (WssGBLUP). We used single-step GWAS (ssGWAS) method to perform GWAS. The results showed that predictions made using ssGBLUP and WssGBLUP were 6.9% and 12.4% more accurate, respectively, compared with pedigree-based BLUP. Among the single-step methods, the performance of WssGBLUP was the best with the smallest mean squared (absolute) error. In addition, ssGWAS identified 3 potential SNPs with suggestive significance that were associated with body weight. Moreover, NOS1AP, CHMP4A, and RBMS1 genes were highlighted as functionally plausible candidate genes underlying the genetic architecture of body weight. These findings illustrate that the using GS in Russian sturgeon breeding could help in better selection of breeding candidates to facilitate complex economic growth trait.

Improving the accuracy of genomic predictions for disease resistance traits in fish using a multiple-trait linear-threshold model

Genomic selection is effective in enhancing the selection efficiency during breeding for improved disease resistance in fish. However, given that the collection of routine disease challenge data is generally costly and that disease resistance traits are threshold traits with typically low heritability, there has been comparatively limited progress in improving the accuracy of genomic prediction. The objective of this study was to assess the advantage of a multiple-trait linear-threshold model in genomic prediction of disease resistance traits in fish. The study was based on analyses of both simulated data and real data obtained for a rainbow trout population. We simulated a linear trait (growth trait, h2 = 0.3) and a binary threshold trait (disease resistance trait, h2 = 0.1) with different genetic correlations (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5). Single- and multiple-trait models with best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and genomic BLUP (GBLUP) were implemented to investigate their prediction abilities. Moreover, we also assessed the impact of missing proportions of a reference population on genomic prediction for disease resistance traits. The results revealed that methods using marker information produced more accurate predictions than the pedigree-based BLUP method. Furthermore, for between-trait genetic correlations of 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5, the multiple-trait GBLUP for disease resistance traits showed 1.0%, 1.5% and 6.4% higher accuracy than single-trait GBLUP, respectively. Meanwhile, no improvement in accuracy was observed for the assessed growth trait. Moreover, with an increase in the genetic correlation between traits, we observed reductions in the consistency of estimated SNP effects using single-trait and multiple-trait GBLUP models. Our findings indicated the superiority of multiple-trait models in genomic prediction for a disease resistance trait with missing data; this superiority is more pronounced when the proportion of the reference population missing is large. Furthermore, using real data obtained for rainbow trout, we verified the advantage of the multiple-trait linear-threshold model in genomic prediction of binary survival, with the multiple-trait GBLUP model yielding a lower mean squared (absolute) error than the single-trait GBLUP model. Overall, our findings have important implications with regard to applying multiple-trait linear-threshold model in genomic selection for disease resistance in most aquaculture species.

Genomic Selection for Milk Production Traits in Xinjiang Brown Cattle.

Simple SummaryMilk production is an important trait in the breeding and genetic improvement of Xinjiang Brown cattle. To obtain the best strategy for improving the reliability of the breeding value estimation for each trait, we used single-trait and multitrait models based on the A-array pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and H-array single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) to perform the genetic evaluation of different strategies using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian methods. Upon comparison, the ssGBLUP calculation results of the multitrait models obtained using the REML and Bayesian methods were better than those of other strategies. Considering the calculation time, the multitrait model REML method is recommended for ssGBLUP calculation to accurately predict the breeding value of young animals; thus, this strategy should be used for the early breeding selection of Xinjiang Brown cattle.One-step genomic selection is a method for improving the reliability of the breeding value estimation. This study aimed to compare the reliability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP), single-trait and multitrait models, and the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian methods. Data were collected from the production performance records of 2207 Xinjiang Brown cattle in Xinjiang from 1983 to 2018. A cross test was designed to calculate the genetic parameters and reliability of the breeding value of 305 daily milk yield (305 dMY), milk fat yield (MFY), milk protein yield (MPY), and somatic cell score (SCS) of Xinjiang Brown cattle. The heritability of 305 dMY, MFY, MPY, and SCS estimated using the REML and Bayesian multitrait models was approximately 0.39 (0.02), 0.40 (0.03), 0.49 (0.02), and 0.07 (0.02), respectively. The heritability and estimated breeding value (EBV) and the reliability of milk production traits of these cattle calculated based on PBLUP and ssGBLUP using the multitrait model REML and Bayesian methods were higher than those of the single-trait model REML method; the ssGBLUP method was significantly better than the PBLUP method. The reliability of the estimated breeding value can be improved from 0.9% to 3.6%, and the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for the genotyped population can reach 83%. Therefore, the genetic evaluation of the multitrait model is better than that of the single-trait model. Thus, genomic selection can be applied to small population varieties such as Xinjiang Brown cattle, in improving the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value.

Accuracies of genomic predictions for disease resistance of striped catfish to Edwardsiella ictaluri using artificial intelligence algorithms.

Assessments of genomic prediction accuracies using artificial intelligent (AI) algorithms (i.e., machine and deep learning methods) are currently not available or very limited in aquaculture species. The principal aim of this study was to examine the predictive performance of these new methods for disease resistance to Edwardsiella ictaluri in a population of striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus and to make comparisons with four common methods, i.e., pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP), genomic-based best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) and a nonlinear Bayesian approach (notably BayesR). Our analyses using machine learning (i.e., ML-KAML) and deep learning (i.e., DL-MLP and DL-CNN) together with the four common methods (PBLUP, GBLUP, ssGBLUP, and BayesR) were conducted for two main disease resistance traits (i.e., survival status coded as 0 and 1 and survival time, i.e., days that the animals were still alive after the challenge test) in a pedigree consisting of 560 individual animals (490 offspring and 70 parents) genotyped for 14,154 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). The results using 6,470 SNPs after quality control showed that machine learning methods outperformed PBLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP, with the increases in the prediction accuracies for both traits by 9.1–15.4%. However, the prediction accuracies obtained from machine learning methods were comparable to those estimated using BayesR. Imputation of missing genotypes using AlphaFamImpute increased the prediction accuracies by 5.3–19.2% in all the methods and data used. On the other hand, there were insignificant decreases (0.3–5.6%) in the prediction accuracies for both survival status and survival time when multivariate models were used in comparison to univariate analyses. Interestingly, the genomic prediction accuracies based on only highly significant SNPs (P < 0.00001, 318–400 SNPs for survival status and 1,362–1,589 SNPs for survival time) were somewhat lower (0.3–15.6%) than those obtained from the whole set of 6,470 SNPs. In most of our analyses, the accuracies of genomic prediction were somewhat higher for survival time than survival status (0/1 data). It is concluded that although there are prospects for the application of genomic selection to increase disease resistance to E. ictaluri in striped catfish breeding programs, further evaluation of these methods should be made in independent families/populations when more data are accumulated in future generations to avoid possible biases in the genetic parameters estimates and prediction accuracies for the disease-resistant traits studied in this population of striped catfish P. hypophthalmus.

Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values in Pinus sylvestris.

Genomic selection study (GS) focusing on nonadditive genetic effects of dominance and the first order of epistatic effects, in a full-sib family population of 695 Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees, was undertaken for growth and wood quality traits, using 6,344 single nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNPs) generated by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). Genomic marker-based relationship matrices offer more effective modeling of nonadditive genetic effects than pedigree-based models, thus increasing the knowledge on the relevance of dominance and epistatic variation in forest tree breeding. Genomic marker-based models were compared with pedigree-based models showing a considerable dominance and epistatic variation for growth traits. Nonadditive genetic variation of epistatic nature (additive × additive) was detected for growth traits, wood density (DEN), and modulus of elasticity (MOEd) representing between 2.27 and 34.5% of the total phenotypic variance. Including dominance variance in pedigree-based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (PBLUP) and epistatic variance in genomic-based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) resulted in decreased narrow-sense heritability and increased broad-sense heritability for growth traits, DEN and MOEd. Higher genetic gains were reached with early GS based on total genetic values, than with conventional pedigree selection for a selection intensity of 1%. This study indicates that nonadditive genetic variance may have a significant role in the variation of selection traits of Scots pine, thus clonal deployment could be an attractive alternative for the species. Additionally, confidence in the role of nonadditive genetic effects in this breeding program should be pursued in the future, using GS.

Short communication: investigation of the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle.

Icelandic Cattle is a local dairy cattle breed in Iceland. With about 26,000 breeding females, it is by far the largest among the indigenous Nordic cattle breeds. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle. Pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) were compared. Accuracy, bias, and dispersion of estimated breeding values (EBV) for milk yield (MY), fat yield (FY), protein yield (PY), and somatic cell score (SCS) were estimated in a cross validation-based design. Accuracy (r^) was estimated by the correlation between EBV and corrected phenotype in a validation set. The accuracy (r^) of predictions using ssGBLUP increased by 13, 23, 19, and 20 percentage points for MY, FY, PY, and SCS for genotyped animals, compared with PBLUP. The accuracy of nongenotyped animals was not improved for MY and PY, but increased by 0.9 and 3.5 percentage points for FY and SCS. We used the linear regression (LR) method to quantify relative improvements in accuracy, bias (Δ^), and dispersion (b^) of EBV. Using the LR method, the relative improvements in accuracy of validation from PBLUP to ssGBLUP were 43%, 60%, 50%, and 48% for genotyped animals for MY, FY, PY, and SCS. Single-step GBLUP EBV were less underestimated (Δ^), and less overdispersed (b^) than PBLUP EBV for FY and PY. Pedigree-based BLUP EBV were close to unbiased for MY and SCS. Single-step GBLUP underestimated MY EBV but overestimated SCS EBV. Based on the average accuracy of 0.45 for ssGBLUP EBV obtained in this study, selection intensities according to the breeding scheme of Icelandic Cattle, and assuming a generation interval of 2.0 yr for sires of bulls, sires of dams and dams of bulls, genetic gain in Icelandic Cattle could be increased by about 50% relative to the current breeding scheme.

Genomic predictions for fillet yield and firmness in rainbow trout using reduced-density SNP panels

BackgroundOne of the most important goals for the rainbow trout aquaculture industry is to improve fillet yield and fillet quality. Previously, we showed that a 50 K transcribed-SNP chip can be used to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with fillet yield and fillet firmness. In this study, data from 1568 fish genotyped for the 50 K transcribed-SNP chip and ~ 774 fish phenotyped for fillet yield and fillet firmness were used in a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) model to compute the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). In addition, pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) was used to calculate traditional, family-based estimated breeding values (EBV).ResultsThe genomic predictions outperformed the traditional EBV by 35% for fillet yield and 42% for fillet firmness. The predictive ability for fillet yield and fillet firmness was 0.19–0.20 with PBLUP, and 0.27 with ssGBLUP. Additionally, reducing SNP panel densities indicated that using 500–800 SNPs in genomic predictions still provides predictive abilities higher than PBLUP.ConclusionThese results suggest that genomic evaluation is a feasible strategy to identify and select fish with superior genetic merit within rainbow trout families, even with low-density SNP panels.

Advantage of including Genomic Information to Predict Breeding Values for Lactation Yields of Milk, Fat, and Protein or Somatic Cell Score in a New Zealand Dairy Goat Herd.

Simple SummaryThe objective of this study was to quantify the benefit from the inclusion of genomic information in the estimation of breeding values for lactation yields of milk, fat, and protein or somatic cell score in a New Zealand dairy goat herd. The dataset included lactation yields of milk, fat, and protein and average somatic cell score of 839 does and genotypes from 388 does. A prototype single-step BayesC model was developed to predict genomic breeding values and demonstrated that including genomic information into the evaluation can increase the accuracy of predictions compared with the traditional best linear unbiased prediction methods based on pedigrees alone, which is currently implemented in the New Zealand dairy goat industry.Selection on genomic breeding values (GBVs) is now readily available for ranking candidates in improvement schemes. Our objective was to quantify benefits in terms of accuracy of prediction from including genomic information in the single-trait estimation of breeding values (BVs) for a New Zealand mixed breed dairy goat herd. The dataset comprised phenotypic and pedigree records of 839 does. The phenotypes comprised estimates of 305-day lactation yields of milk, fat, and protein and average somatic cell score from the 2016 production season. Only 388 of the goats were genotyped with a Caprine 50K SNP chip and 41,981 of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) passed quality control. Pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) was used to obtain across-breed breeding values (EBVs), whereas a single-step BayesC model (ssBC) was used to estimate across-breed GBVs. The average prediction accuracies ranged from 0.20 to 0.22 for EBVs and 0.34 to 0.43 for GBVs. Accuracies of GBVs were up to 103% greater than EBVs. Breed effects were more reliably estimated in the ssBC model compared with the PBLUP model. The greatest benefit of genomic prediction was for individuals with no pedigree or phenotypic records. Including genomic information improved the prediction accuracy of BVs compared with the current pedigree-based BLUP method currently implemented in the New Zealand dairy goat population.

Genetic parameters, prediction, and selection in a white Guinea yam early-generation breeding population using pedigree information.

Better understanding of the genetic control of traits in breeding populations is crucial for the selection of superior varieties and parents. This study aimed to assess genetic parameters and breeding values for six essential traits in a white Guinea yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.) breeding population. For this, pedigree‐based best linear unbiased prediction (P‐BLUP) was used. The results revealed significant nonadditive genetic variances and medium to high (.45–.79) broad‐sense heritability estimates for the traits studied. The pattern of associations among the genetic values of the traits suggests that selection based on a multiple‐trait selection index has potential for identifying superior breeding lines. Parental breeding values predicted using progeny performance identified 13 clones with high genetic potential for simultaneous improvement of the measured traits in the yam breeding program. Subsets of progeny were identified for intermating or further variety testing based on additive genetic and total genetic values. Selection of the top 5% progenies based on the multi‐trait index revealed positive genetic gains for fresh tuber yield (t ha−1), tuber yield (kg plant−1), and average tuber weight (kg). However, genetic gain was negative for tuber dry matter content and Yam mosaic virus resistance in comparison with standard varieties. Our results show the relevance of P‐BLUP for the selection of superior parental clones and progenies with higher breeding values for interbreeding and higher genotypic value for variety development in yam.

Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals

BackgroundPreselection of candidates, hereafter referred to as preselection, is a common practice in breeding programs. Preselection can cause bias and accuracy loss in subsequent pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP). However, the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) is not completely clear yet. Therefore, in this study, we investigated, across different heritabilities, the impact of intensity and type of preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals.MethodsWe simulated a nucleus of a breeding programme, in which a recent population of 15 generations was produced with PBLUP-based selection. In generation 15 of this recent population, the parents of the next generation were preselected using several preselection scenarios. These scenarios were combinations of three intensities of preselection (no, high or very high preselection) and three types of preselection (genomic, parental average or random), across three heritabilities (0.5, 0.3 or 0.1). Following each preselection scenario, a subsequent evaluation was performed using ssGBLUP by excluding all the information from the preculled animals, and these genetic evaluations were compared in terms of accuracy and bias for the preselected animals, and in terms of realized genetic gain.ResultsType of preselection affected selection accuracy at both preselection and subsequent evaluation stages. While preselection accuracy decreased, accuracy in the subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation increased, from genomic to parent average to random preselection scenarios. Bias was always negligible. Genetic gain decreased from genomic to parent average to random preselection scenarios. Genetic gain also decreased with increasing intensity of preselection, but only by a maximum of 0.1 additive genetic standard deviation from no to very high genomic preselection scenarios.ConclusionsUsing ssGBLUP in subsequent evaluations prevents preselection bias, irrespective of intensity and type of preselection, and heritability. With GPS, in addition to reducing the phenotyping effort considerably, the use of ssGBLUP in subsequent evaluations realizes only a slightly lower genetic gain than that realized without preselection. This is especially the case for traits that are expensive to measure (e.g. feed intake of individual broiler chickens), and traits for which phenotypes can only be measured at advanced stages of life (e.g. litter size in pigs).

The Effect of Integrating Genomic Information into Genetic Evaluations of Chinese Merino Sheep.

Simple SummaryGenetic improvement of wool production and quality traits in fine-wool sheep is an appealing option for enhancing the market value of wool products. We estimated genetic parameters and the accuracies of estimated breeding values for various wool production and quality traits in fine-wool sheep using pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) strategies. ssGBLUP performed slightly better than PBLUP for the studied traits. Therefore, the single-step genetic evaluation method could be successfully implemented in genomic evaluations of fine-wool sheep and the prediction of future breeding values in young Merino sheep as part of an early preselection strategy in the near future.Genomic evaluations are a method for improving the accuracy of breeding value estimation. This study aimed to compare estimates of genetic parameters and the accuracy of breeding values for wool traits in Merino sheep between pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) using Bayesian inference. Data were collected from 28,391 yearlings of Chinese Merino sheep (classified in 1992–2018) at the Xinjiang Gonaisi Fine Wool Sheep-Breeding Farm, China. Subjectively-assessed wool traits, namely, spinning count (SC), crimp definition (CRIM), oil (OIL), and body size (BS), and objectively-measured traits, namely, fleece length (FL), greasy fleece weight (GFW), mean fiber diameter (MFD), crimp number (CN), and body weight pre-shearing (BWPS), were analyzed. The estimates of heritability for wool traits were low to moderate. The largest h2 values were observed for FL (0.277) and MFD (0.290) with ssGBLUP. The heritabilities estimated for wool traits with ssGBLUP were slightly higher than those obtained with PBLUP. The accuracies of breeding values were low to moderate, ranging from 0.362 to 0.573 for the whole population and from 0.318 to 0.676 for the genotyped subpopulation. The correlation between the estimated breeding values (EBVs) and genomic EBVs (GEBVs) ranged from 0.717 to 0.862 for the whole population, and the relative increase in accuracy when comparing EBVs with GEBVs ranged from 0.372% to 7.486% for these traits. However, in the genotyped population, the rank correlation between the estimates obtained with PBLUP and ssGBLUP was reduced to 0.525 to 0.769, with increases in average accuracy of 3.016% to 11.736% for the GEBVs in relation to the EBVs. Thus, genomic information could allow us to more accurately estimate the relationships between animals and improve estimates of heritability and the accuracy of breeding values by ssGBLUP.

Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo).

Genomic information can contribute significantly to the increase in accuracy of genetic predictions compared to using pedigree relationships alone. The main objective of this study was to compare the prediction ability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) models. Turkey records of feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake, body weight, breast meat yield, and walking ability were provided by Hybrid Turkeys, Kitchener, Canada. This data was analyzed using pedigree-based and single-step genomic models. The genomic relationship matrix was calculated either using observed allele frequencies, all allele frequencies equal to 0.5 or with a different scaling. To avoid potential problems with inversion, three different weighting factors were applied to combine the genomic and pedigree matrices. Across the studied traits, ssGBLUP had higher heritability estimates and significantly outperformed PBLUP in terms of accuracy. Walking ability was genetically negatively correlated to body weight and breast meat yield; however, it was not correlated to feed conversion ratio (FCR) or residual feed intake (RFI). Body weight showed a moderate positive genetic correlation to feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake and breast meat yield. Feed conversion ratio was strongly correlated to residual feed intake (0.68 ± 0.06). There was almost no genetic correlation between breast meat yield and feed efficiency traits. Larger differences in accuracy between PBLUP and ssGBLUP were observed for traits with lower heritability. Results of the three weighting factors showed only slight differences and an increase in accuracy of prediction compared to PBLUP. Slightly different levels of bias were observed across the models, but were higher among the traits; BMY was the only trait that had a regression coefficient higher than 1 (1.38 to 1.41). We show that incorporating genomic information increases the prediction accuracy for preselection of young candidate turkeys for the five traits investigated. Single-step genomic prediction showed substantially higher accuracy estimates than the pedigree-based model, and only slight differences in bias were observed across the alternate models.

Genome-wide association analysis and accuracy of genome-enabled breeding value predictions for resistance to infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus in a commercial rainbow trout breeding population

BackgroundInfectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) is a disease of salmonid fish that is caused by the IHN virus (IHNV). Under intensive aquaculture conditions, IHNV can cause significant mortality and economic losses. Currently, there is no proven and cost-effective method for IHNV control. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. has been applying selective breeding to improve genetic resistance to IHNV in their rainbow trout breeding program. The goals of this study were to elucidate the genetic architecture of IHNV resistance in this commercial population by performing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with multiple regression single-step methods and to assess if genomic selection can improve the accuracy of genetic merit predictions over conventional pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) using cross-validation analysis.ResultsTen moderate-effect quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with resistance to IHNV that jointly explained up to 42% of the additive genetic variance were detected in our GWAS. Only three of the 10 QTL were detected by both single-step Bayesian multiple regression (ssBMR) and weighted single-step GBLUP (wssGBLUP) methods. The accuracy of breeding value predictions with wssGBLUP (0.33–0.39) was substantially better than with PBLUP (0.13–0.24).ConclusionsOur comprehensive genome-wide scan for QTL revealed that genetic resistance to IHNV is controlled by the oligogenic inheritance of up to 10 moderate-effect QTL and many small-effect loci in this commercial rainbow trout breeding population. Taken together, our results suggest that whole genome-enabled selection models will be more effective than the conventional pedigree-based method for breeding value estimation or the marker-assisted selection approach for improving the genetic resistance of rainbow trout to IHNV in this population.

Whole-genome mapping of quantitative trait loci and accuracy of genomic predictions for resistance to columnaris disease in two rainbow trout breeding populations

BackgroundColumnaris disease (CD) is an emerging problem for the rainbow trout aquaculture industry in the US. The objectives of this study were to: (1) identify common genomic regions that explain a large proportion of the additive genetic variance for resistance to CD in two rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations; and (2) estimate the gains in prediction accuracy when genomic information is used to evaluate the genetic potential of survival to columnaris infection in each population.MethodsTwo aquaculture populations were investigated: the National Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture (NCCCWA) odd-year line and the Troutlodge, Inc., May odd-year (TLUM) nucleus breeding population. Fish that survived to 21 days post-immersion challenge were recorded as resistant. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes were available for 1185 and 1137 fish from NCCCWA and TLUM, respectively. SNP effects and variances were estimated using the weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for genome-wide association. Genomic regions that explained more than 1% of the additive genetic variance were considered to be associated with resistance to CD. Predictive ability was calculated in a fivefold cross-validation scheme and using a linear regression method.ResultsValidation on adjusted phenotypes provided a prediction accuracy close to zero, due to the binary nature of the trait. Using breeding values computed from the complete data as benchmark improved prediction accuracy of genomic models by about 40% compared to the pedigree-based BLUP. Fourteen windows located on six chromosomes were associated with resistance to CD in the NCCCWA population, of which two windows on chromosome Omy 17 jointly explained more than 10% of the additive genetic variance. Twenty-six windows located on 13 chromosomes were associated with resistance to CD in the TLUM population. Only four associated genomic regions overlapped with quantitative trait loci (QTL) between both populations.ConclusionsOur results suggest that genome-wide selection for resistance to CD in rainbow trout has greater potential than selection for a few target genomic regions that were found to be associated to resistance to CD due to the polygenic architecture of this trait, and because the QTL associated with resistance to CD are not sufficiently informative for selection decisions across populations.

Genome-Wide Association Study and Cost-Efficient Genomic Predictions for Growth and Fillet Yield in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).

Fillet yield (FY) and harvest weight (HW) are economically important traits in Nile tilapia production. Genetic improvement of these traits, especially for FY, are lacking, due to the absence of efficient methods to measure the traits without sacrificing fish and the use of information from relatives to selection. However, genomic information could be used by genomic selection to improve traits that are difficult to measure directly in selection candidates, as in the case of FY. The objectives of this study were: (i) to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to dissect the genetic architecture of FY and HW, (ii) to evaluate the accuracy of genotype imputation and (iii) to assess the accuracy of genomic selection using true and imputed low-density (LD) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels to determine a cost-effective strategy for practical implementation of genomic information in tilapia breeding programs. The data set consisted of 5,866 phenotyped animals and 1,238 genotyped animals (108 parents and 1,130 offspring) using a 50K SNP panel. The GWAS were performed using all genotyped and phenotyped animals. The genotyped imputation was performed from LD panels (LD0.5K, LD1K and LD3K) to high-density panel (HD), using information from parents and 20% of offspring in the reference set and the remaining 80% in the validation set. In addition, we tested the accuracy of genomic selection using true and imputed genotypes comparing the accuracy obtained from pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and genomic predictions. The results from GWAS supports evidence of the polygenic nature of FY and HW. The accuracy of imputation ranged from 0.90 to 0.98 for LD0.5K and LD3K, respectively. The accuracy of genomic prediction outperformed the estimated breeding value from PBLUP. The use of imputation for genomic selection resulted in an increased relative accuracy independent of the trait and LD panel analyzed. The present results suggest that genotype imputation could be a cost-effective strategy for genomic selection in Nile tilapia breeding programs.