Pediatric Mental Health Research Articles

Study: More inpatient beds needed to tackle youth MH crisis

Given a pediatric mental health crisis that continues to worsen, children increasingly have prolonged emergency department (ED) visits while awaiting mental health care; however, those long waits have been partially attributed to inadequate availability of pediatric inpatient psychiatric beds, according to a study published last month in JAMA Pediatrics.

Clinical utility of administering the WISC-V as standard practice in paediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) assessments in a public hospital and health system: a rapid review to inform clinical practice

ABSTRACT Objective The purpose of this rapid review is to appraise the current evidence-base to inform the development of a new assessment and diagnostic pathway for ADHD presentations in a public health paediatric department in Brisbane. We posited that the standardised WISC-V administration in all ADHD presentations regardless of cognitive indication was low-value, inefficient and burdensome for clinicians, children and their families. We wanted to find out if the literature supports this position. Method This review used PRISMA systematic methods to search two relevant databases (PUBMED, and Elsevier (ClinicalKey)). Search terms were used: (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder OR ADHD) AND (children) AND (assessment OR diagnosis) AND (Australia) AND (cognitive proficiency) OR (WISC). Results Search returned 286 full text journal articles, published between 2018 and 2023. Two hundred and sixty-two were removed to irrelevance, adult population, duplications, or focus on other paediatric mental health disorders. Following the application of exclusion criteria, 10 were reviewed at full text and four were ultimately included for contribution to this rapid review. Conclusions Neuropsychological testing if no cognitive query is indicated may confound the findings. This review provided the opportunity to improve clinical efficiency without compromising diagnostic accuracy.

Listening to children with lower limb loss: Rationale, design, and protocol for delivery of a novel globally applicable research toolkit-Prosthetic user needs, quality of life, pain, and physical function.

Rehabilitation after childhood lower limb loss is complex and dependent on multiple stakeholders and environmental factors. While research with adults underscores the importance of involving prosthetic limb users and caregivers in discussions to drive innovation, children are often excluded or not effectively engaged. This protocol lays out the development and implementation protocol for an internationally applicable research toolkit which has been designed and evaluated around the essential presence of the child. Research domains span their unique prosthetic needs, quality of life, pain, and mobility. Cohorts of children in contrasting environments were identified (Cambodia, Gaza Strip, and the UK) to provide a comprehensive global understanding of the child with lower limb loss. A literature review revealed a lack of appropriate tools for identifying paediatric prosthetic user requirements leading to the development of novel interview guides for each key stakeholder: child, caregiver, and prosthetist. The child's guide centred around enjoyment and engagement using card games and activities. A panel of experts in paediatric limb loss and mental health rigorously reviewed the guides. Guides were integrated with existing validated measures for quality of life, pain, and mobility to form a comprehensive toolkit. The toolkit was successfully piloted with 5 children, their families, and 2 prosthetists. This protocol lays out the toolkit rationale and implementation plan (Jan 2023 to Dec 2025). This work offers the opportunity for this cohort to enjoyably engage with research that seeks to radically improve prospects for all children living with limb loss. The outlined best practices ensure ethical considerations when working with vulnerable cohorts. This study is approved to cover implementation at all geographical locations as well as the researcher institutions. Results will be disseminated through national and international conferences, as well as through manuscripts in leading peer-reviewed journals.

Emergency Medical Services and Police Utilization for Pediatric Mental and Behavioral Health Concerns Within a Large Hospital System.

This study aimed to compare emergency medical services (EMS) and police utilization trends, epidemiology, and emergency department (ED) outcomes between pediatric patients with mental or behavioral health (MBH) emergencies and those with non-MBH concerns transported to a large children's hospital system. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 5 to 18 years transported via EMS and police to two EDs affiliated with a children's hospital from January 2012 through December 2020. Data were abstracted from electronic hospital records. Encounters for MBH emergencies were identified using diagnostic codes and chief complaints. Trends of EMS and police transports of patients with MBH emergencies were examined. Patient demographics and ED outcomes were compared between children presenting with MBH emergencies and those with non-MBH concerns. During the 9-year study period, out of 40,663 transports to the EDs, 36,137 (89%) arrived via EMS, and 4,526 (11%) arrived via police. A total of 10,250 (28.4%) EMS transports were for MBH emergencies. The volume of patients transported by EMS for MBH emergencies increased by 1.4% per year (P < 0.01) with no significant change in total EMS patient volumes. Patients with MBH emergencies transported by EMS were more likely to be older, female, of White race, and publicly insured; require restraint in the ED; and be admitted (P < 0.001). Of police transports, 4153 (91.8%) were for MBH emergencies, with no statistical change in the proportion of police transports that were for MBH emergencies. Police-transported MBH patients compared to non-MBH police-transported patients were more likely to be younger, female, and of White race (P < 0.001); 8.7% required mechanical/physical restraints in ED, 6.7% required pharmacologic restraint medications in ED, and 53% were admitted. The proportion of pediatric transports for MBH emergencies by EMS is rising and comprises the majority of police transports. Distinct from non-MBH pediatric patients transported, MBH patients necessitate significant ED resources, including ED-administered restraints and admission, highlighting their unique burden on the prehospital and ED systems.

Pediatric emergency mental health presentations during early COVID-19: Comparing virtual and in-person presentations.

Purpose: Increased mental health (MH) needs during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the implementation of a novel pediatric Emergency Department Virtual Care (EDVC) service. Our study aimed to describe the pediatric MH patient population that used EDVC by comparing patient-specific factors of those who obtained services virtually to those seen in-person. Method: This retrospective chart review was conducted at a pediatric hospital in Eastern Ontario. Children and youth (aged 3-17) who received virtual or in-person emergency MH services from May to December 2020 were included. Patient demographics, clinical presentation details and disposition were compared between the virtual and in-person groups. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 1104 youth (96.1%) utilized the in-person ED for MH concerns; 45 (3.9%) used EDVC. In-person youth had a higher level of perceived risk (78.9% vs. 41.9%) and were more likely to present with concerns of depression, suicidal ideation, self-harm, or laceration (46.1% vs. 35.6%). Anxiety/situational crises or behavioural issues were more likely to present virtually. Eight patients (17.8%) were redirected to the ED from EDVC. Conclusions: Several patient-specific factors varied between youth seen in-person or virtually for MH concern. Study results can assist with the design and implementation of virtual MH care platforms.

Perspective: Expanding Pediatric Mental Health Care Access Programs Into Hospital Settings.

Perspective: Expanding Pediatric Mental Health Care Access Programs Into Hospital Settings.

Nurse Perceptions of Pediatric Mental Health Emergency Care: A Qualitative Study

The key goal of the mental health nurse practicing in emergency mental health care services is ensuring that their patients have access to best practice mental health care. The aim of this study was to examine mental health nurses’ perceptions of their role in and preparation for providing mental health care services for pediatric emergency department patients. A qualitative constructivist method was employed. Inductive data were gathered using a focus group discussion model employing open-ended questions as probes. The participants were nine experienced practicing mental health nurses. Discussion was facilitated through detailed probing of the nurses’ experiences in providing care for clients in emergency departments. Four principal themes emerged from the data about mental health nurses’ experiences during the provision of emergency care: (i) barriers to adequate care provision; (ii) problems among populations; (iii) pediatric special needs; and (iv) the general need for improvements to mental health care. Each participant in this study asserted that they endorse the introduction of care by specialized mental health nurses in emergency care departments to better serve this population in Saudi Arabia. Inclusion and acceptance of psychiatric mental health nurses as full members of the multidisciplinary emergency department team, improved education and training opportunities, standards-based evaluation by collegial supervisors, availability of tools for assessment, and recognition of the role of pediatric psychiatric mental health nurses in emergency department care were goals expressed by the focus group members.

Using Neuropsychological Profiling to Tailor Mental Health Care for Children and Youth: a Quality Improvement Project to Measure Feasibility.

Precision child and youth mental healthcare has great potential to improve treatment success by tailoring interventions to individual needs. An innovative care pathway in a pediatric mental health outpatient clinic was designed to allow for neuropsychology data to be integrated in psychotherapeutic care. This paper describes the feasibility of this new pathway, including implementation outcomes, acceptability, and potential for future integration. The target population was outpatients 6-17years old referred for individual treatment to a tertiary outpatient mental health (OPMH) clinic. The new care pathway was co-developed by neuropsychologists and mental health practitioners. A logic model was created to guide the evaluation, which was informed by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework. As part of the logic model, a stepped assessment protocol was implemented, and reports on neuropsychological function were shared with patients, caregivers, and care providers. Evaluation data were collected from phone surveys, questionnaires, a focus group, and administrative records. Forty-two patients scheduled to receive therapy over a 6-month period were offered the opportunity to participate in the new care pathway and 39 (93%) agreed. Self-reported outcome data showed that 83% of patients and 94% of caregivers valued neuropsychology-informed care, with some describing it as transformative. Almost all practitioners (91%) reported that the project added value to their clinical care. There were no adverse effects on participants nor the flow of patients through the system. Neuropsychology-informed pediatric OPMH care was feasible and well-received. Clinical effectiveness should be studied in an experimental trial.

Efficacy of Gamified Digital Mental Health Interventions for Pediatric Mental Health Conditions

Anxiety, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affect up to 20% of children and adolescents. Despite demonstrated efficacy, evidence-based treatments for these conditions are often inaccessible; innovative solutions are essential to meet the demand for pediatric mental health care. To examine the efficacy and moderators of gamified DMHIs for anxiety, depression, and ADHD in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for children and adolescents. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science was conducted for RCTs published before March 20, 2024. RCTs that evaluated the efficacy of gamified DMHIs for treating pediatric ADHD, depression, or anxiety were included. Studies were excluded if they did not use a gamified DMHI, provide sufficient data for effect sizes, or were unavailable in English. Efficacy data were extracted from rating scales for ADHD, depression, and anxiety. Extracted moderator variables included participant characteristics (eg, age and sex), intervention characteristics (eg, delivery modality and time limit), and trial design characteristics (eg, outcome measure and risk of bias). The primary outcome was change in ADHD, depression, or anxiety severity in the treatment group compared to the control group. Hedges g quantified treatment effects. The search strategy identified 27 RCTs that included 2911 participants across ADHD, depression, and anxiety disorders. There were modest significant effects of gamified DMHIs on ADHD (g, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.48) and depression (g, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.47) but small, nonsignificant effects for anxiety disorders (g, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.17). Moderator analyses revealed that DMHIs for ADHD delivered on a computer and those RCTs that had a greater preponderance of male participants produced larger treatment effects. DMHIs for depressive disorders that used preset time limits for gamified DMHIs also exhibited larger treatment effects. The findings suggest a benefit of gamified DMHIs for youth with ADHD or depressive disorder. Pediatricians and other health care professionals have new information about novel, accessible, and efficacious options for pediatric mental health care.

Impact of a collaborative model on community clinician confidence in child and adolescent mental health care, wellbeing, and access to child psychiatry expertise.

The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in child and adolescent mental health disorders, with subsequent worsening of patient access to specialist mental health care. Clinicians working in the community were faced with increased demands to diagnose and manage pediatric mental health disorders, without always having the confidence and knowledge to do so. We therefore developed COnnecting Mental-health PAediatric Specialists and community Services (COMPASS)-a collaborative model designed to upskill community clinicians in child and adolescent mental health care and provide them with better access to child and adolescent psychiatry expertise. COMPASS comprises (1) an online Community of Practice (CoP) with fortnightly one-hour sessions covering: anxiety; aggression and challenging behaviours; depression; self-harm and suicidality; eating disorders; and autism spectrum disorder/complex cases and (2) primary and secondary consultations for general practitioners and paediatricians with an experienced child psychiatrist. We aimed to assess the impact of COMPASS on community clinician self-reported confidence in: managing common child and adolescent mental health disorders (Objective 1, primary outcome); navigating the mental health care system (i.e. knowing how services are organised, accessed, and how to refer patients, Objective 2); diagnosing conditions (Objective 3); prescribing psychotropic medications (Objective 4) as well as the impact on, clinician practice and wellbeing (Objective 5) and outcomes of patients referred by COMPASS clinicians to the child psychiatrist (Objective 6). We evaluated COMPASS in its first year, with COMPASS running from March to July 2021. Participating clinicians completed pre-post surveys evaluating change in Objectives 1 to 4 above, using study-designed measures. A purposive sample of clinicians was then invited to a semi-structured interview to understand their experience of COMPASS and its impacts on practice and wellbeing (Objective 5). We adopted an inductive approach to the qualitative analysis using the Framework Method. This involved selecting five random transcripts which were double coded and categorized, to generate an initial framework against which all subsequent transcripts were analysed. Themes and subthemes were generated from the data set, by reviewing the matrix and making connections within and between clinicians, codes and categories One child psychiatrist completed a 2-week logbook of the nature and outcomes of primary and secondary consultations (Objective 6). 51 (86%) clinicians attended CoP sessions and completed pre-post surveys, with 92% recommending COMPASS to peers. Clinicians reported increased confidence in the pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of all conditions, most notably for management of self-harm. They also reported increased knowledge of how to navigate the mental health system and prescribe medications. Qualitative analysis (n = 27 interviews) found that COMPASS increased clinician wellbeing and reduced feelings of professional isolation and burnout. Over the 2-week snapshot, the child psychiatrist consulted on 22 patients and referred all back to the community clinician. COMPASS is associated with improved clinician confidence to manage child and adolescent mental health concerns, navigate the mental health system, improved clinician wellbeing, and reduced need for ongoing mental health care by specialists.

Pediatric inpatient psychiatric beds needed to meet demand

Inadequate availability of pediatric psychiatric beds is partially attributed to the worsening pediatric mental health crisis, along with children who increasingly have prolonged emergency department visits while awaiting definitive mental health care, according to a research letter published online last month in JAMA Pediatrics.

Measuring Disparities in the Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Mental Health in Primary Care Settings.

To examine disparities in mental health diagnosis, depression screening, and depressive symptoms in pediatric primary care settings before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to evaluate the use of electronic health records to study temporal trends in pediatric mental and behavioral health (MBH). This is an IRB-approved, retrospective study of pediatric patients (n=10,866) who visited three primary care sites at an academic medical center before (2017-2019) and during (2020-2022) the COVID-19 pandemic. We used logistic regression to compare rates of diagnoses, depression screening, and depression symptom scores among demographic groups. This study demonstrates an increase in both PHQ-9A screening rates and average scores from 2017-2019 to 2020-2022. There were significant disparities in common mental health diagnoses, including higher rates of psychological distress among lower income and Hispanic patients, both before and during the pandemic, despite lower rates of screening among Hispanic patients. This suggests a need for improved equity in routine MBH screening and additional research to better understand the underlying social determinants that may be driving the greater mental health burden for certain marginalized youth.This study also highlights the strengths and challenges of utilizing EHR data to characterize disparities in pediatric mental illness. Although the nature of care delivery in an academic medical center clinic and the limitations of the EHR for collecting relevant data present challenges to this measurement, the EHR is nevertheless a promising tool for measuring and tracking pediatric mental health disparities.

A Medical Student-Inspired Advocacy Effort to Improve Pediatric Mental Health Services

The demand for pediatric mental health services has exceeded the supply of mental health providers for decades and increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the federal administration’s interest in passing a major funding bill to address the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors recognized an opportunity to collaborate in an advocacy effort to request federal financial support for Pediatric Mental Health Care Access Programs (PMHCAPs). The challenges of the pandemic and limited travel became assets as the advocacy team, who lived hundreds of miles apart in 2 states, met virtually with each other and with Congressional staff during February of 2021 on a tight timeline. In March of 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan that provided $80 million for PMHCAPs.

Comprehensiveness of State Insurance Laws and Perceived Access to Pediatric Mental Health Care

Many US children and adolescents with mental and behavioral health (MBH) conditions do not access MBH services. One contributing factor is limited insurance coverage, which is influenced by state MBH insurance parity legislation. To investigate the association of patient-level factors and the comprehensiveness of state MBH insurance legislation with perceived poor access to MBH care and perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage for US children and adolescents. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using responses by caregivers of children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years with MBH conditions in the National Survey of Children's Health and State Mental Health Insurance Laws Dataset from 2016 to 2019. Data analyses were conducted from May 2022 to January 2024. MBH insurance legislation comprehensiveness defined by State Mental Health Insurance Laws Dataset (SMHILD) scores (range, 0-7). Perceived poor access to MBH care and perceived inadequacy of MBH insurance were assessed. Multivariable regression models adjusted for individual-level characteristics. There were 29 876 caregivers of children and adolescents with MBH conditions during the study period representing 14 292 300 youths nationally (7 816 727 aged 12-17 years [54.7%]; 8 455 171 male [59.2%]; 292 543 Asian [2.0%], 2 076 442 Black [14.5%], and 9 942 088 White [69.6%%]; 3 202 525 Hispanic [22.4%]). A total of 3193 caregivers representing 1 770 492 children and adolescents (12.4%) perceived poor access to MBH care, and 3517 caregivers representing 1 643 260 of 13 175 295 children and adolescents (12.5%) perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage. In multivariable models, there were higher odds of perceived poor access to MBH care among caregivers of Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.75) and Asian (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.01-2.84) compared with White children and adolescents. As exposures to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) increased, the odds of perceived poor access to MBH care increased (aORs ranged from 1.68; 95%, CI 1.32-2.13 for 1 ACE to 4.28; 95% CI, 3.17-5.77 for ≥4 ACEs compared with no ACEs). Compared with living in states with the least comprehensive MBH insurance legislation (SMHILD score, 0-2), living in states with the most comprehensive legislation (SMHILD score, 5-7) was associated with lower odds of perceived poor access to MBH care (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99), while living in states with moderately comprehensive legislation (score, 4) was associated with higher odds of perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.49). In this study, living in states with the most comprehensive MBH insurance legislation was associated with lower odds of perceived poor access to MBH care among caregivers for children and adolescents with MBH conditions. This finding suggests that advocacy for comprehensive mental health parity legislation may promote improved child and adolescent access to MBH services.

Pre-implementation determinants for digital mental health integration in Chicago pediatric primary care.

Pediatric primary care (PPC) is a common treatment site for pediatric mental health, but it is currently unable to meet the needs of all teen patients, particularly those with minoritized identities and/or marginalized experiences. Digital mental health (DMH) low-intensity treatments (LITs) can increase mental health screening and care capacity in PPC, but how this is done successfully without burdening providers, patients, or families is unclear. This paper presents a pre-implementation study aimed at understanding the implementation context (PPCs in Chicago, IL) for a specific DMH LIT. Using a mixed-methods design, quantitative data from an online survey of providers assessed current DMH practices in PPC, and qualitative interviews with Pediatricians and Pediatric Psychologists examined implementation determinants for a specific DMH LIT. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative assessment. Survey reports (n = 105) and interviews (n = 6) indicated low current use of DMH. Providers in PPC clinics voiced multiple reasons for low usage and low perceived feasibility, including: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Inner Setting Domain (PPC clinic workflow, responsibility and ethical considerations, patient privacy and confidentiality), CFIR Outer Setting Domain (hospital and healthcare system factors), CFIR Innovation Domain (DMH design), and a cross-cutting theme of safety. Provider-reported low feasibility for integrating DMH in PPC is a call to action to partner with interdisciplinary colleagues and identify how such settings can ethically and seamlessly deliver digital evidence-based and accessible screening and care prior to implementation.

A Family-Based Approach to Promoting Pediatric Mental Health Recovery in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The purpose of this scoping review is to identify strategies from existing literature, for school-based professionals to share with parents, that may be used on a family-level to help the recovery from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric mental health. This scoping review consists of a comprehensive PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar database search. Studies published between 2020 and 2023 that were written in English, originated in the United States, and evaluated pediatric mental health in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic were considered for inclusion in the scoping review. One researcher independently conducted the PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar literature search. Subsequently, results were reviewed independently by two additional researchers. Title and abstract review were conducted for 2563 articles. After excluding studies not written in English, studies with international origin, and studies which were not relevant to this scoping review, 101 studies remained for full-text review. After full-text review, 32 studies (31.68%) were deemed relevant and concordant with the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. We identified five prominent themes: 1) maintaining daily life and routines, 2) the importance of physical activity and the pandemic's effect on student athletes' mental health, 3) the use of screen time, 4) the effect of parent and caregiver stress on their children's mental health, and 5) the effect of pandemic-related health disparities and racism on pediatric mental health. This scoping review focused on interventions and practices which can be implemented at the family level to help children and adolescents recover from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on their mental health.

Facilitators and Barriers to Shared Decision-Making Communication Between Latina Mothers and Pediatric Mental Healthcare Providers

ABSTRACT This study assessed communication factors influencing shared decision-making (SDM) between language-congruent clinicians and Latina mothers of pediatric mental health patients. The sample comprised Latinx youth up to 22 years old who were enrolled in mental healthcare and attended mental health-related sessions with their parent. One hundred transcripts depicting mental health visits were coded using the Conversation Analysis framework. Coding included inductive coding that came from analyzing the structure, or orderliness, of the visits and content discussed that affects SDM. Thematic qualitative analysis revealed that facilitators to SDM included collaborative engagement, parents being active in tailoring session content, and integrating the preferences, roles, and next steps for treatment among all participants. Barriers included unskilled interpersonal interactions undermining rapport, off-topic conversations becoming the session’s focus, poor time management, and irregularly integrating parent/patient preferences into the clinician’s decisions regarding the child’s treatment. Additionally, visit content, structure, tone, and interpersonal engagement were factors that variably facilitated or served as barriers to patient participation in SDM and were integral to collaborative, family-centered care. These findings delineated characteristics of pediatric mental health conversations and identified areas to strengthen communication between parents, patients, and clinicians to shift toward more effective SDM and improve patient outcomes among Latinx families.

Scope-of-Practice Expansions Associated with Reduced Racial Disparities in Pediatric Mental Health Care.

To examine the association between scope-of-practice (SoP) regulations and racial disparities in pediatric mental health services. We used the National Survey of Children's Health (2016-2020; n = 33,790) to examine racial disparities in unmet mental health care needs and receipt of mental health medication between states with and without SoP expansions for psychologists and nurse practitioners (NP). Our primary outcomes were (1) unmet mental health care needs and (2) receipt of mental health medication. We examined heterogeneous treatment effects of SoP expansion on the outcomes using logistic regression with interaction terms between SoP expansion and race/ethnicity. We estimated population-level racial disparities for both outcomes stratified by SoP expansion to identify differences in racial disparities. The psychologist SoP expansion-associated reduction in unmet need was 15.8 percentage-points (CI= -25.3, -6.2) larger for Other-race children than for White children. The psychologist SoP expansion-associated increase in medication was 5.1%-points (CI=. 0.8, 9.4) larger for Black children and 5.6%-points (CI = 0.5, 10.8) for Other-race children. No differences were found for NP SoP expansion. Racial disparities in both outcomes were lower in psychologist SoP expansion states but varied in NP SoP states. Expanded SoP was generally associated with lower racial disparities in pediatric mental health care access.

Validating the Ontario Child Health Study Emotional Behavioural Scales-Brief Version (OCHS-EBS-B) in children with chronic physical illness.

A substantial proportion of children have a physical illness; these children commonly experience physical-mental comorbidity. To assess child mental health, brief scales that can be used in clinical and research settings are needed. This study assessed the validity and reliability of parent-reported Ontario Child Health Study Emotional Behavioural Scale-Brief Version (OCHS-EBS-B) scores. Data come from a longitudinal study of children aged 2-16 years with a physical illness recruited from outpatient clinics at a pediatric hospital. Confirmatory factor analysis and McDonald's coefficient assessed the factor structure and internal consistency reliability of the OCHS-EBS-B, respectively. Point biserial correlations assessed agreement between the OCHS-EBS-B and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID), a structured diagnostic interview. The Wilcoxon rank sum test compared OCHS-EBS-B scores between children with versus without physical-mental comorbidity (known-group validity). The three-factor structure of the OCHS-EBS-B was replicated in this sample of children with physical illness (χ2 = 196.23(272), p < 0.001; CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.98; SRMR = 0.06; RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.034 [0.027, 0.044]). It had excellent internal consistency reliability (ω = 0.86-0.92) and was moderately correlated with the MINI-KID (baseline: rpb = 0.43-0.51; 6 months: rpb = 0.55-0.65). OCHS-EBS-B scores were significantly higher among children with versus without physical-mental comorbidity. Findings confirm psychometric evidence that the OCHS-EBS-B is a valid and reliable measure of mental health in children with chronic physical illness. Its brevity and robust psychometric properties make the OCHS-EBS-B a strong candidate for routine use in integrated pediatric physical and mental health services.

Digital and Hybrid Pediatric and Youth Mental Health Program Implementation Challenges During the Pandemic: Literature Review With a Knowledge Translation and Theoretical Lens Analysis.

The pandemic brought unprecedented challenges for child and youth mental health. There was a rise in depression, anxiety, and symptoms of suicidal ideation. The aims of this knowledge synthesis were to gain a deeper understanding of what types of mental health knowledge translation (KT) programs, mental health first aid training, and positive psychology interventions were developed and evaluated for youth mental health. We undertook a literature review of PubMed and MEDLINE for relevant studies on youth mental health including digital and hybrid programs undertaken during the pandemic (2020-2022). A total of 60 studies were included in this review. A few KT programs were identified that engaged with a wide range of stakeholders during the pandemic, and a few were informed by KT theories. Key challenges during the implementation of mental health programs for youth included lack of access to technology and privacy concerns. Hybrid web-based and face-to-face KT and mental health care were recommended. Providers required adequate training in using telehealth and space. There is an opportunity to reduce the barriers to implementing tele-mental health in youth by providing adequate technological access, Wi-Fi and stationary internet connectivity, and privacy protection. Staff gained new knowledge and training from the pandemic experience of using telehealth, which will serve as a useful foundation for the future. Future research should aim to maximize the benefits of hybrid models of tele-mental health and face-to-face sessions while working on minimizing the potential barriers that were identified. In addition, future programs could consider combining mental health first aid training with hybrid digital and face-to-face mental health program delivery along with mindfulness and resilience building in a unified model of care, knowledge dissemination, and implementation.