Pediatric Liver Transplantation Research Articles

Evaluation of valganciclovir's neutropenia risk in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients utilizing two dosing regimens.

Valganciclovir is approved for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatrics using the Pescovitz algorithm. There are reports of valganciclovir overdoses in children with low body surface area and overestimated creatinine clearance utilizing this algorithm. This study compared the incidence of neutropenia and cytomegalovirus infection between the Pescovitz and weight-based dosing algorithms. A single-center retrospective chart review from January 2010 to September 2018 was performed on pediatric heart, liver, and kidney transplant recipients, who received valganciclovir. Data were collected from the initiation of valganciclovir prophylaxis to 30 days after discontinuation. The primary objective was the incidence of neutropenia in patients receiving valganciclovir dosed by the Pescovitz versus weight-based dosing algorithms. This study included 187 pediatric transplant recipients who received valganciclovir dosed via the Pescovitz (62 recipients) or weight-based dosing algorithms (125 recipients). The incidence of neutropenia was higher in the Pescovitz (69.4%) compared to the weight-based dosing group (53.6%; p = .04) including moderate and severe neutropenia. Cytomegalovirus viremia was not significantly different between the two groups and occurred in 4.8% of the Pescovitz group compared to 2.4% of the weight-based group (p = .4). The incidence of neutropenia was greater in recipients receiving valganciclovir dosed via the Pescovitz algorithm compared to the weight-based dosing. There were no significant differences in regard to cytomegalovirus viremia or disease between the two groups.

Sevoflurane preconditioning in living liver donation is associated with better initial graft function after pediatric transplantation: a retrospective study

IntroductionInitial allograft function determines the patient’s immediate prognosis in pediatric liver transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injuries play a role in initial poor graft function (IPGF). In animal studies, preconditioning with inhaled anesthetic agents has demonstrated a protective effect on the liver. In humans, the few available studies are conflicting. This study assesses the association between the hypnotic agent used to maintain anesthesia during hepatectomy in living donors and the occurrence of IPGF after pediatric transplantation.MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of children who received a living donor liver transplant (LDLT) between 2010 and 2019. We analyzed the incidence of EAD according to the hypnotic agent used to maintain general anesthesia during donor hepatectomy.ResultsWe included 183 pairs of patients (living donors-recipients). The anesthetics used in the donor were propofol (n = 85), sevoflurane (n = 69), or propofol with sevoflurane started 30 min before clamping (n = 29). Forty-two children (23%) developed IPGF. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with the occurrence of IPGF were the anesthesia maintenance agent used in the donor (p = 0.004), age of the donor (p = 0.03), duration of transplant surgery (p = 0.009), preoperative receiver neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.02), and albumin (p = 0.05).ConclusionSignificantly fewer children who received a graft from a donor in whom only sevoflurane was used to maintain anesthesia developed IPGF. Although additional research is needed, this preconditioning strategy may provide an option to prevent IPGF after living liver donation.

Paediatric Liver Transplant at Army Liver Transplant Unit, Pakistan; A Four-Year Data

Objective: To re-examine the data about survival, prognosis, and complications of twenty-five paediatric liver transplant procedures carried out at Army Liver Transplant Unit, Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Study Design: Retrospective longitudinal study. Place and Duration of Study: Army Liver Transplant Unit, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from Jan 2016 to Feb 2020. Methodology: The procedural and follow-up data regarding twenty-five pediatric liver transplants was reviewed, and demographic variables, transplant indications and outcomes were documented. Results: The donation was entirely from living donors. Recipients included 12 boys and 13 girls of mean age 5.8±2.00 years. The stay at the hospital averaged 18±5.6 days. Indications in the order of frequency of encounter included 9(36%) cases of Cryptogenic liver cirrhosis, 4(16%) cases of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, 3(12%) cases of Wilson’s disease, 2(8%) cases of Tyrosinemia, congenital hepatic fibrosis and biliary atresia each and one patient (4%) of Criggler-Najjar syndrome, glycogen storage diseases and autoimmune liver disease each. Major complications included viral infections, thrombosis of the portal vein and hepatic artery, bile leak and post-transplant diaphragmatic hernia. 20(80%) recipients were recorded to have survived during the follow-up. Conclusion: Encouraging results are noted, particularly a high survival rate (20 out of 25) and low complications (few and only well-known in this age group).

Comparative Effectiveness of Perioperative Antibiotic Regimens to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a common complication in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Lack of pediatric prophylaxis guidelines results in variation in preventative antibiotic regimens. We performed a retrospective observational study of LT recipients <18 years old using a merged data set that included data from the Pediatric Health Information System and the United Network for Organ Sharing between 2006 and 2017. The exposure was defined as the antibiotic(s) received within 24 hours of LT, with 6 categories, ranging from narrow (category 1: cefazolin), to broad). The primary outcome was presence or absence of SSI in the index admission. Mixed-effects logistic regression compared the effectiveness of each category in preventing SSI, relative to category 1. Of the 2586 LT, 284 (11%) met SSI criteria. The SSI rate was higher in the younger subcohort (16.2%) than in the older (8.6%), necessitating a stratified analysis. Antibiotics from category 5 were most commonly used. In the younger subcohort, the adjusted risk was increased in all categories compared with the reference, most notably in category 3 (odds ratio [OR], 2.58 [95% confidence interval: .69-9.59]) and category 6 (2.76 [.66-11.56]). In the older subcohort, estimated ORs were also increased for each category, most notably in category 4 (2.49 [95% confidence interval: .99-6.27]). None of the ORs suggested benefit from broader-spectrum prophylaxis. Our E-value assessment suggests that it's unlikely there is unmeasured confounding by indication to the degree necessary to revert ORs to protective. There was wide variation in antibiotic prophylaxis. Adjusted analyses did not reveal a protective benefit of broader-spectrum prophylaxis in either subcohort, suggesting that narrower regimens may be adequate.

Elevated Plasma CXCL8 Concentrations in Significant Fibrosis but Not in Subclinical Rejection After Adult Liver Transplantation

Background. The noninvasive detection of subclinical graft injury including subclinical T cell–mediated rejection (subTCMR) is one of the unresolved challenges after liver transplantation. Recently, serum C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8) was proposed as a highly accurate marker of subTCMR in pediatric liver transplant recipients. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the quantification of this chemokine for predicting subTCMR in adult liver transplant recipients, as well as its capacity to classify patients who could benefit from immunosuppression reduction. Methods. Plasma CXCL8 concentrations were measured retrospectively in a prospectively collected cohort of adult liver transplant recipients with well-characterized histologic phenotypes. Results. In total, 78 patients were included. Median plasma CXCL8 concentrations did not differ (P = 0.24) between patients without histological evidence of rejection (3.6 [0.4–22.0] pg/mL), subTCMR (11.5 [0.4–41.0] pg/mL), clinical TCMR (9.4 [0.4–40.5] pg/mL), and other etiologies of graft injury (8.7 [0.4–31.2] pg/mL). Likewise, plasma CXCL8 concentrations did not discriminate between patients within and outside histologic criteria for immunosuppression reduction that were proposed by the 2016 Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology (cutoff: 10.9 pg/mL, sensitivity: 0.48, and specificity: 0.79). Furthermore, weak correlation was found between plasma CXCL8 and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (Spearman ρ = 0.18 and 0.25). Patients with significant fibrosis (17.8 [0.4–40.5] pg/mL) showed higher plasma CXCL8 concentrations than patients without fibrosis (8.2 [0.4–41.0] pg/mL; P = 0.05). Conclusions. Plasma CXCL8 concentrations are not predictive of subclinical graft injury or of histological criteria for the minimization of immunosuppression in adult liver transplant recipients.

Long-term Catch-up Growth and Risk Factors for Short Adult Height After Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

Children requiring liver transplantation generally have severe growth retardation. Recipients experience posttransplantation catch-up growth, although some show short adult heights. We aimed to determine decades-long catch-up growth trends and risk factors for short adult height following liver transplantation. We analyzed long-term height Z scores and risk factors for short adult height in a single-center retrospective cohort of 117 pediatric liver transplantation recipients who survived >5 y, with 75 of them reaching adult height. Median age at transplantation was 1.3 y, and the most common primary diagnosis was biliary atresia (76.9%). Mean height Z scores pretransplantation and 1, 3, and 8 y after transplantation were -2.26, -1.59, -0.91, and -0.59, respectively. The data then plateaued until 20 y posttransplantation when mean adult height Z score became -0.88, with a median follow-up of 18.6 y. Nineteen recipients did not show any catch-up growth, and one quarter of recipients had short adult height (<5th percentile of the healthy population). Multivariate analysis identified old age (odds ratio, 1.22 by 1 y; P = 0.002), low height Z scores at transplantation (odds ratio, 0.46 by 1 point; P < 0.001), and posttransplantation hospital stay ≥60 d (odds ratio, 4.95; P = 0.015) as risk factors for short adult height. In contrast, prolonged steroid use after transplantation was not considered a significant risk factor. Although tremendous posttransplantation catch-up growth was observed, final adult height remained inadequate. For healthy physical growth, liver transplantation should be performed as early as possible, before growth retardation becomes severe.

Living Donor Whole and Partial Liver Grafts, Deceased Donor Whole Liver and SPLIT: Outcome Comparison

BackgroundCurrently, graft options for pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) include whole (WL) and partial (P) grafts, in the form of either deceased donor transplantation (DD) or living donor liver transplantation (LD). WL transplants from LD are commonly referred to as domino LT. The objective of this manuscript is to compare the outcomes of PLT performed with each of the available graft options. MethodsRetrospective cohort study from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2022. The variables included data on the recipients’ preoperative clinical status, intraoperative technical aspects, post-operative complications, and survival studies. There were 4 groups: SPLIT (17), DD-WL (55), LD-WL (824), and LD-P (22). ResultsThe median age and BW of the recipients was smaller in SPLIT, LD-P, and LD-WL compared to DDT-WL groups. HVOO (HR 15.87, 95% CI 1.89–133.06, P = 0.01), retransplantation (HR 7.94, 95% CI 2.63–24.02, P < 0.01), and malignancies (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.29–7.37, P = 0.01) were independently associated with decreased patient survival. HAT (HR 27.54, 95% CI 10.44–72.68, P < 0.01) and malignancies (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.10–5.34, P = 0.03) increased the risk of graft loss. The overall survival in this series was 91.4% (mean follow-up of 74.3 months). Patient and graft survival were not different among groups. ConclusionHAT and malignancies were associated with reduced graft survival. Whole liver from living donors with MSUD presented 100% patient survival at 120 months. Even without statistical differences in survival among the studied groups, LD-P and LD-WL recipients presented a trend towards better outcomes. Level of EvidenceLEVEL III.

Simultaneous total internal biliary diversion during liver transplantation for progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1: Standard of care?

Patients post liver transplant (LT) with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (PFIC-1) often develop progressive graft steatohepatitis, intractable diarrhea, and growth failure. A total internal biliary diversion (TIBD) during an LT may prevent or reverse these adverse events. Children with PFIC-1 who underwent an LT at our institute were divided into 2 groups, A and B based on the timeline where we started offering a TIBD in association with LT. Pre-LT parameters, intraoperative details, and posttransplant complications like graft steatosis and diarrhea were also analyzed between the 2 groups, and their growth velocity was measured in the follow-up period. Of 550 pediatric LT performed between 2011 and 2022, 13 children underwent LT for PFIC-1. Group A had 7 patients (A1-A7) and group B had 6 (B1-B6). Patients A1, A4, B4, and B5 had a failed partial internal biliary diversion before offering them an LT. Patients A1, A2, and A6 in group A died in the post-LT period (2 early allograft dysfunction and 1 posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder) whereas A3, A4, and A5 had graft steatosis in the follow-up period. A4 was offered a TIBD 4 years after LT following which the graft steatosis fully resolved. In group B, B1, B2, B5, and B6 underwent TIBD during LT, and B3 and B4 had it 24 and 5 months subsequently for intractable diarrhea and graft steatosis. None of the patients in group B demonstrated graft steatosis or diarrhea and had good growth catch-up during follow-up. We demonstrate that simultaneous TIBD in patients undergoing LT should be a standard practice as it helps dramatically improve outcomes in PFIC-1 as it prevents graft steatosis and/or fibrosis, diarrhea, and improves growth catch-up.

A305 ANONYMOUS LIVING LIVER DONATION IMPROVES ACCESS FOR MEDICALLY UNDERSERVED CHILDREN IN NEED OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

Abstract Background Since our first pediatric anonymous non-directed live donor liver transplant (A-LDLT) performed in April 2005, 62 children have undergone live donor liver transplant (LDLT) with an anonymous non-directed graft. Anon-LDLT organs being allocated as per our deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) wait list. Aims To evaluate clinical outcomes, recipient characteristics and social determinants of health of pediatric recipients of A-LDLT in comparison to those who received a directed LDLT (Dir-LDLT) and DDLT. Methods Retrospective analysis of all recipients of LDLT performed between January 2005 and March 2023. Demographic and clinical data included age, sex, race, ethnicity, single-parent households, primary diagnosis, recipient blood type, time on waiting list, post-LT intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), time to extubation, and post-transplant comorbidities were assessed as covariates. A comparative analysis was conducted between children receiving A-LDLT, Dir-LDLT versus DDLT. Results A total of 422 (50% male, 57% white, 23% Asian, 7% Black, 5% indigenous) childrenunderwent LT during the study period. Biliary atresia (40%) and metabolic diseases (19%) were the commonest primary indications. A-LDLT was done in 62 children (15%) with no directed donor options. Dir-LDLT was in 174 children (41%). Of 186 DDLTs (44%), 25% were split grafts, 26% reduced, and 49% whole liver grafts. In A-LDLT recipients, the primary diseases were more frequently characterized by metabolic disorders (31%), while the incidence of acute liver failure was notably lower (0%). Recipients of Anon-LDLT were more often Indigenous recipients in comparison to Dir-LDLT or DDLT recipients (p=0.044). Anon-LDLT recipients were more frequently living in single parent households (18% vs 3% vs 10%, pampersand:003C0.001) and to require interpreter assistance (11% vs 3% vs 0.5%, pampersand:003C0.001) (Table), compared to children who received Dir-LDLT or DDLT. Median time on the wait list was longer for Anon-LDLT (92 days) compared to Dir-LDLT (62 days) and DDLT (72 days) recipients (p=0.004). Post-LT ICU LOS, time to extubation, other post-LT complications or patient prognosis were better in the A-LDLT and Dir-LDLT recipients than DDLT recipients. Conclusions This retrospective analysis of 422 children undergoing LT at a single institution confirms excellent patient and graft survival for A-LDLT recipients. Patients from Indigenous communities, single parent and households where English is a second language, are more frequently the beneficiaries of Anon-LDLT grafts. Anon-LDLT, as utilized in this single center analysis, benefits medically underserved pediatric patients who otherwise have limited access to the advantages of LT. Funding Agencies None

Hepatic granulomas in a pediatric liver transplant recipient

Hepatic granulomas in a pediatric liver transplant recipient

Patient-centered research in pediatric transplant: Engaging families and recipients

Pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients navigate a lifelong journey that includes constant monitoring and challenges. Research priorities and questions in LT have traditionally been provider-driven. This project was a novel partnership between a learning health system dedicated to pediatric LT (Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation) and a parent-led advocacy group (Transplant Families) that aimed to prepare families and providers for collaborative patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR). We developed 5 virtual modules to (1) teach participants about PCOR, and (2) elicit ideas for PCOR priorities and processes in pediatric LT. Parents and providers participated via self-guided online modules or focus groups. Participants included 240 patient partners and 133 pediatric LT providers from 16 centers over 2 years. We held 20 focus groups, including 5 to amplify underrepresented voices: young adults, Spanish speakers, and African Americans. Feedback was summarized to create a PCOR Roadmap, a guide for future PCOR in the Starzl Network, which was disseminated back to participants online and via webinars. Feedback from a diverse group of stakeholders allowed us to develop PCOR priorities and processes for the pediatric LT community. Our engagement strategies could be adapted by other transplant communities to facilitate patient and provider research partnerships.

Diminished measles immunity after paediatric liver transplantation-A retrospective, single-centre, cross-sectional analysis.

Liver transplantation in childhood has an excellent long-term outcome, but is associated with a long-term risk of infection. Measles is a vaccine-preventable infection, with case series describing severe courses with graft rejection, mechanical ventilation and even death in liver transplant recipients. Since about 30% of liver transplanted children receive liver transplants in their first year of life, not all have reached the recommended age for live vaccinations. On the contrary, live vaccines are contraindicated after transplantation. In addition, vaccination response is poorer in individuals with liver disease compared to healthy children. This retrospective, single-centre, cross-sectional study examines measles immunity in paediatric liver transplant recipients before and after transplantation. Vaccination records of 239 patients, followed up at Hannover Medical School between January 2021 and December 2022 were analysed. Twenty eight children were excluded due to stem cell transplantation, regular immunoglobulin substitution or measles vaccination after transplantation. More than 55% of all 211 children analysed and 75% of all those vaccinated at least once are measles seropositive after transplantation-48% after one and 84% after two vaccinations-which is less than in healthy individuals. Interestingly, 26% of unvaccinated children also showed measles antibodies and about 5-15% of vaccinated patients who were seronegative at the time of transplantation were seropositive afterwards, both possibly through infection. In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, the number of vaccinations (HR 4.30 [95% CI 2.09-8.83], p<0.001), seropositivity before transplantation (HR 2.38 [95% CI 1.07-5.30], p = 0.034) and higher age at time of first vaccination (HR 11.5 [95% CI 6.92-19.1], p<0.001) are independently associated with measles immunity after transplantation. In contrast, older age at testing is inversely associated (HR 0.09 [95% CI 0.06-0.15], p<0.001), indicating a loss of immunity. Vaccination in the first year of life does not pose a risk of non-immunity. The underlying liver disease influences the level of measles titres of twice-vaccinated patients; those with acute liver failure being the lowest compared to children with metabolic disease. In summary, vaccine response is poorer in children with liver disease. Liver transplant candidates should be vaccinated before transplantation even if this is earlier in the first year of life. Checking measles IgG and re-vaccinating seronegative patients may help to achieve immunity after transplantation.

Understanding the living-related pediatric liver transplantation donor's decision process: A questionnaire-based retrospective study.

To analyse the donor characteristics and understand the sociocultural and familial aspects of the decision to donate for living donor liver transplant. This is a retrospective study done in the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology of a liver transplant centre. We enrolled the consenting donors of pediatric liver transplantation between January 2020 and January 2022. The study was conducted through an anonymized questionnaire which was drafted in a multiple-choice format. The questionnaire had three domains having questions pertaining to demographic details, donor characteristicsand sociofamilial aspects of the decision-making process. The study cohort consisted of 50 donors, 23 males (46%) and 27 females (54%), with the mean age being 31.8 ± 5.6 years. Parent-to-child was the most frequent relationship (n = 39, 78%). More than half of our donors had annual income <2.5lakh/annum or <3500 USD(n = 27, 54%). Twenty-six (52%) responders had >4 members in their family; 62% were residing in urban areas and 52% of the donors were graduates. The main source of information regarding the feasibility of living donor liver transplantation wasprimary physicians in 46%. Financial management was the main hurdle in 72%. Majority (74%) denied any effect on their marital relationship and 6% of donors thought that the degree of information provided to them before the transplantation regarding donation was insufficient. Our study serves as an essential tool for health professionals to provide sufficient support to the donor. Clinical outcomes and cost must be part of the discussion between caregivers, health professionalsand fund contributors.

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in the differential diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after pediatric liver transplantation.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a significant complication after liver transplantation. Research on the diagnostic value of the Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) metabolic parameters of PTLD in pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) recipients is limited. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating between PTLD and non-PTLD lymphadenopathy in pLT recipients. This retrospective study collected the 18F-FDG PET/CT scans with clinical and pathological information of all consecutive children who were clinically suspected of PTLD from November 2016 to September 2022 at the Beijing Friendship Hospital. The 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters of the two groups were analyzed. We then established a diagnostic model composed of the clinical characteristics and metabolic parameters. In total, 57 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 40 had PTLD and 17 had non-PTLD lymphadenopathy. Of the metabolic parameters examined in this study, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value [0.757, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.632-0.883, P=0.002]. The AUCs of the other metabolic parameters were all less than the AUC of TLG, including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (AUC: 0.725, 95% CI: 0.597-0.853, P=0.008), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) (AUC: 0.701, 95% CI: 0.568-0.834, P=0.017), metabolic tumor volume total (MTVtotal) (AUC: 0.688, 95% CI: 0.549-0.827, P=0.040), TLG total (AUC: 0.674, 95% CI: 0.536-0.812, P=0.026). The diagnostic model, which was composed of clinical characteristics (digestive symptoms), the SUVmax, TLG, and the MTVtotal, showed excellent performance in the differential diagnosis (sensitivity: 0.675, 95% CI: 0.508-0.809; specificity: 0.941, 95% CI: 0.692-0.997; positive predictive value: 0.964, 95% CI: 0.798-0.998; and negative predictive value: 0.552, 95% CI: 0.360-0.730). The 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters can be used to distinguishing between PTLD and non-PTLD lymphadenopathy in pLT recipients.

European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (3) postoperative imaging

BackgroundLiver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of postoperative complications. So far, limited data is available regarding the best radiologic approach to monitor children after liver transplantation.ObjectiveTo harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases. This paper reports the responses related to postoperative imaging.Materials and methodsAn online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey.ResultsAll sites commence ultrasound (US) monitoring within 24 h after liver transplantation. Monitoring frequency varies across sites, ranging from every 8 h to 72 h in early, and from daily to sporadic use in late postoperative phases. Predefined US protocols are used by 73% of sites. This commonly includes gray scale, color Doppler, and quantitative flow assessment. Alternative flow imaging techniques, contrast-enhanced US, and elastography are applied at 31.8%, 18.2%, and 63.6% of sites, respectively. Computed tomography is performed at 86.4% of sites when clarification is needed. Magnetic resonance imaging is used for selected cases at 36.4% of sites, mainly for assessment of biliary abnormalities or when blood tests are abnormal.ConclusionDiagnostic imaging is extensively used for postoperative surveillance of children after liver transplantation. While US is generally prioritized, substantial differences were noted in US protocol, timing, and monitoring frequency. The study highlights potential areas for future optimization and standardization of imaging, essential for conducting multicenter studies.

Live-attenuated vaccination for measles, mumps, and rubella in pediatric liver transplantation.

Infections are a serious short- and long-term problem after pediatric organ transplantation. In immunocompromised patients, they can lead to transplant rejection or a severe course with a sometimes fatal outcome. Vaccination is an appropriate means of reducing morbidity and mortality caused by vaccine-preventable diseases. Unfortunately, due to the disease or its course, it is not always possible to establish adequate vaccine protection against live-attenuated viral vaccines (LAVVs) prior to transplantation. LAVVs such as measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) are still contraindicated in solid organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy (IST), thus creating a dilemma. This review discusses whether, when, and how live-attenuated MMR vaccines can be administered effectively and safely to pediatric liver transplant recipients based on the available data. We searched PubMed for literature on live-attenuated MMR vaccination in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). Nine prospective observational studies and three retrospective case series were identified in which at least 833 doses of measles vaccine were administered to 716 liver transplant children receiving IST. In these selected patients, MMR vaccination was well tolerated and no serious adverse reactions to the vaccine were observed. In addition, an immune response to the vaccine was demonstrated in patients receiving IST. Due to inadequate vaccine protection in this high-risk group, maximum efforts must be made to ensure full immunization. MMR vaccination could also be considered for unprotected patients after LT receiving IST following an individual risk assessment, as severe harm from live vaccines after liver transplantation has been reported only very rarely. To this end, it is important to establish standardized and simple criteria for the selection of suitable patients and the administration of the MMR vaccine to ensure safe use.

Combining living and deceased donation for pediatric first isolated liver transplantation: A win-win even in countries with high deceased donor donation rates.

Split and living donor liver transplantations are both key surgical strategies for development of pediatric liver transplant programs. Often, however, teams tend to prioritize only one preferentially. In the context of a very active national split liver graft allocation program (Italy), retrospective study of 226 consecutive pediatric first isolated liver transplants performed by a single team using organs from both deceased and living donors. Clinical characterisitics and outcome were compared. In the context of a steadily slowly decreasing split graft offer, living donation activity steadily increased. Deceased and living donation accounted for 52.6% and 47.4% of transplantations, respectively. Both strategies were equally used for transplanting patients up to 30 kg of weight, while deceased donors were predominantly used for older recipients. Technical variants represented 86% of all transplants, with 183 conisting of left lateral segment grafts (76 split liver grafts and 107 left grafts from living donors). Outcome of both surgical strategies was similar, with excellent outcomes at early, mid-, and long-term. Splitting livers of deceased donors and using living donation were complementary and non-competitive strategies for developping pediatric liver transplant activity. Implementing both activities in parallell allowed to maintain stable the number of annual transplant in Italy and allowed to reach superior outcomes. This analysis provides evidence that living donation plays a role in Italy despite an existing very active "mandatory-split" national policy.

Proceedings of the 28th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society.

The 2023 Joint International Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS), the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA), and the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe (LICAGE) held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, marked a significant recovery milestone for the liver transplant community after COVID-19. With 1159 participants and a surge in abstract submissions, the event focused on "Liver Disorders and Transplantation: Innovations and Evolving Indications." This conference report provides a comprehensive overview of the key themes discussed during the event, encompassing Hepatology, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Acute Liver Failure, Infectious Disease, Immunosuppression, Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Transplant Oncology, Surgical Approaches, and Machine Perfusion. The congress provided a platform for extensive discussions on a wide range of topics, reflecting the continuous advancements and collaborative efforts within the liver transplant community.

Challenges faced in establishing a pediatric liver transplant program in a lower-middle-income country with free healthcare service.

Liver transplant is the cure for children with liver failure. Sri Lanka is a lower-middle-income country with a predominant free, state health system. Pediatric liver transplant program in Sri Lanka is still in the budding state where the initial experience of the program is yet to be documented. A retrospective review was performed including the clinical characteristics of all pediatric liver transplant recipients of Colombo North Centre for Liver Diseases since the inception of the program from June 2020 to May 2023. There were 14 PLT performed in 3 years. The median recipient age and weight were 8 years (6 months-15 years) and 23.3 kg (6.4-49.2), respectively. The majority were boys (64%). All were from low-income backgrounds. Indications for LT were acute liver failure (5/14), decompensated chronic liver disease (5/14), and acute on chronic liver failure (4/14). Underlying liver diseases were Wilson disease (6/14), autoimmune liver disease (3/14), biliary atresia (2/14) and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (1/14), and unknown etiology (2/14). The majority were living donor liver transplants (86%). Of the living donors, 42% (5/12) were Buddhist priests. There were three immediate deaths and two late deaths. The 3-month survival was 78%, and overall survival was 64%. Living donor transplants carried a higher success rate (92%) compared to diseased donor transplants (0%; 2/2). Initial experience of pediatric liver transplant program of Sri Lanka is promising despite being established in a free healthcare system amidst the crisis circumstances.

European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (2) intraoperative imaging

BackgroundLiver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of intraoperative and postoperative complications. So far, only limited data regarding the best radiological approach to monitor children during liver transplantation is available.ObjectiveTo harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra- and postoperative phase. This paper reports the responses related to intraoperative imaging.Materials and methodsAn online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey.ResultsIntraoperative ultrasound (US) is used by all sites to assess the quality of the vascular anastomosis in order to ensure optimal perfusion of the liver transplant. Vessel depiction is commonly achieved using color Doppler (95.3%). Additional US-based techniques are employed by fewer centers (power angio mode, 28.6%; B-flow, 19%; contrast-enhanced US, 14.3%). Most centers prefer a collaborative approach, with surgeons responsible for probe handling, while radiologists operate the US machine (47.6%). Less commonly, the intraoperative US is performed by the surgeon alone (28.6%) or by the radiologist alone (23.8%). Timing of US, imaging frequency, and documentation practices vary among centers.ConclusionIntraoperative US is consistently utilized across all sites during pediatric liver transplantation. However, considerable variations were observed in terms of the US setup, technique preferences, timing of controls, and documentation practices. These differences provide valuable insights for future optimization and harmonization studies.