Pediatric Liver Retransplantation Research Articles

Challenges in Pediatric Liver Retransplantation: A Technical Perspective.

Liver retransplantation (reLT) is the only option for pediatric patients experiencing graft loss. Despite recent advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative management, it remains a high-risk procedure. Our aim is to describe our experience in pediatric reLT, focusing on the technical aspects and surgical challenges. We systematically analyzed surgical reports from pediatric reLT performed at our center between 2006 and 2023 to identify recurrent intraoperative findings and specific surgical techniques. We focused on challenges encountered during different phases of reLT, including hepatectomy, vascular, and biliary reconstruction. Additionally, we compared patient and graft survival rates among different groups. During the study period, 23 children underwent 25 reLT procedures at our center. Major surgical challenges included complex hepatectomy and vascular reconstructions, necessitating tailored approaches. Our analysis shows that patient and graft survival were significantly lower for reLT compared to primary transplantation (p = 0.002). Early reLT had a significantly lower graft survival compared to late reLT (p = 0.002), although patient survival was comparable (p = 0.278). Patient and graft survival rates were comparable between the first and second reLT (p = 0.300, p = 0.597). Patient survival tended to be higher after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) compared to deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.511). Pediatric reLT involves significant technical challenges and lower survival rates. Advances in perioperative management are crucial for improving outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize surgical strategies and evaluate the long-term benefits of LDLT in pediatric reLT.

Good outcomes after repeated pediatric liver retransplantations: A justified procedure even in times of organ shortage.

Pediatric liver transplantations generally represent advanced surgery for selected patients. In case of acute or chronic graft failure, biliary or vessel complications, a retransplantation (reLT) can be necessary. In these situations massive adhesions, critical patient condition or lack of good vessels for anastomosis often are problematic. Between 2008 and 2021, 208 pediatric patients received a liver transplantation at our center. Retrospectively, all cases with at least one retransplantation were identified and stored in a database. Indication, intra- and postoperative course and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Altogether 31 patients (14.9%) received a reLT. In 22 cases only one reLT was done, 8 patients received 2 reLTs and 1 patient needed a fourth graft. Median age for primary transplantation, first, second and third reLT was 14 (range: 1-192 months), 60.5 (range: 1-215 months), 58.5 (range: 14-131 months) and 67 months, respectively. Although biliary atresia (42%) and acute liver failure (23%) represented the main indications for the primary liver transplantation, acute and chronic graft failure (1st reLT: 36%, 2nd reLT: 38%), hepatic artery thrombosis (1st reLT: 29%, 2nd reLT: 25%, 3rd reLT: 100%) and biliary complications (1st reLT: 26%, 2nd reLT: 37%) were the most frequent indications for reLT. OS was 81.8% for patients with 1 reLT, 87.5% with 2 reLTs and 100% with 3 reLTs. Pediatric liver retransplantation is possible with a good outcome even after multiple retransplantations in specialized centers. Nevertheless, careful patient and graft selection, as well as good preoperative conditioning, are essential.

Clinical study of causes and outcomes in pediatric liver retransplantation

Objective: To investigate the etiology,clinical features and prognosis of pediatric liver retransplantation. Methods: The data of 1 024 cases of pediatric liver transplantation (<18 years old) from January 2014 to December 2019 operated at Tianjin First Central Hospital were collected,retrospectively. Retransplantation was performed in 26 cases,among which 25 cases received secondary liver transplantation and 1 case received a third liver transplantation. There were 13 male and 12 female patients among the 25 patients. The median age was 12.9(20.5) months(range: 5.8 to 134.8 months), the body weight was 8.0(5.6) kg(range: 5.0 to 30.0 kg) at the time of retransplantation. The pediatric end-stage liver disease(PELD) score was 17.0(21.3) (range: 0 to 45) before retransplantation. The etiology of retransplantation was biliary complications in 7 cases,primary nonfunction of liver graft in 5 cases,antibody-mediated rejection in 4 cases,hepatic artery thrombosis in 3 cases,portal vein thrombosis in 3 cases,concomitant hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis in 2 cases,thrombogenesis of inferior Vena Cava in 1 case and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in 1 case. The patients were divided into two groups according to the time interval(30 days) between two liver transplantations,8 patients were classified into early-retransplantation(≤30 days) group and 18 patients were classified into late-retransplantation (>30 days) group. The etiology of liver retransplantation,pre-transplant score,time interval between two transplantations,surgical aspects,major complications and survival rates were compared between the two groups. Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared with t test,while Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare variables without normal distribution. Categorical variables were compared with chi-square test. The survival curves were created by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log Rank test. Results: The median follow-up time was 26.8(30.2) months(range: 1 day to 85.7 months), and the incidence of retransplantation was 1.9%. In the early-retransplantation group,the duration of surgery was (439.8±151.0)minutes,the graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 5.0(1.8)%(range:3.6% to 6.1%),the main cause for retransplantation were primary nonfunction and vascular complications. In the late-retransplantation group,the duration of surgery was (604.4±158.0)minutes,the graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 3.4(2.1)%(range:1.4% to 5.3%),the main cause for retransplantation were biliary complications,antibody mediated rejection and vascular complications.The 3-month,1-year and 2-year recipient survival rates in the early-retransplantation group were all 62.3%,while the recipient survival rates in the late-retransplantation group were 100%,93.8% and 93.8%,respectively. The difference of recipient survival rates was significant between the early-retransplantation group and the late-retransplantation group(P=0.019). The overall 3-month,1-year and 3-year recipient survival rates after the primary liver transplantation were 97.1%,95.4%,94.1%,respectively. Conclusions: The vascular complications,biliary complications,primary nonfunction and antibody-mediated rejection are the main causes of liver retransplantation.The PELD score is higher in patients receiving early retransplantation,while the surgery is relatively more complex in patients receiving late retransplantation,which is reflected by longer duration of surgeries. Patients in the late-retransplantation group showed similar recipient survival rates with primary liver transplantation recipients,and the survival rates are superior to those of patients in the early-retransplantation group. Infection and multiple organ failure are the most common fatal causes after retransplantation.

The outcomes of pediatric liver retransplantation from a living donor: a 17-year single-center experience.

PurposeLiver retransplantation is the only therapeutic option for patients with graft failure after liver transplantation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of pediatric retransplantation from living donor at a single center.MethodsBetween December 1998 to August 2015, retransplantation from a living donor was performed for 14 children (<18 years of age) at Kumamoto University Hospital. The characteristics of the retransplantation recipient and the clinicopathological factors between primary transplantation and retransplantation were analyzed to detect the prognostic factors.ResultsIn retransplantation, the operative time was longer and the amount of blood loss was greater in comparison to primary transplantation. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates from the date of retransplantation were 85.7, 85.7, and 78.6%, respectively. The rates of re-laparotomy after primary transplantation, bile leakage and postoperative bleeding after retransplantation were higher than after primary transplantation. Among the three patients who died after retransplantation, the operative time, the rate of re-laparotomy after primary transplantation and the incidence of gastrointestinal complications were higher in comparison to the surviving patients.ConclusionPediatric retransplantation from a living donor is an acceptable procedure that could save the lives of recipients with failing allografts when organs from deceased donors are scarce. To ensure good results, it is essential to make an appropriate assessment of the cardiopulmonary function and the infectious state of the patients before Re-LDLT.

Long-term outcomes and predictors in pediatric liver retransplantation.

Historically, 9-29% of pediatric liver transplant recipients have required retransplantation. Although outcomes have improved over the last decade, currently published patient and graft survival remain lower after retransplant than after primary transplant. Data from liver retransplantation recipients at our institution between 1991 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to depict patient and graft survival. Predictors of survival were analyzed using a series of Cox proportional hazards models. Predictors were analyzed separately for patients who had "early" (≤ 30 days after primary transplant) and "late" retransplants. Eighty-four patients underwent retransplant at a median time of 241 days. Sixty percent had late retransplants. At one, five, and 10 yr, actuarial patient and graft survival were 73%/71%, 66%/63%, and 58%/53%, respectively. Since 2002, patient and graft survival improved to 86%/86% at one yr and 93%/87% at five yr. While operative complications were a common cause of death after earlier retransplants, since 2002, infection has been the only cause of death. Significant morbidities at five-yr follow-up include renal dysfunction (15%), diabetes (13%), hypertension (26%), chronic rejection (7%), and PTLD (2%). Current survival after pediatric liver retransplantation has improved significantly, but long-term immunosuppressant morbidity remains an opportunity for improvement.

Pediatric liver retransplantation from living donors can be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with irreversible living donor graft failure

Liver retransplantation (re-LT) is required in patients with irreversible graft failure, but it is a significant issue that remains medically, ethically, and economically controversial, especially in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome, morbidity, mortality, safety and prognostic factors to improve the outcome of pediatric living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT). Six of 172 children that underwent LDLT between January 2001 and March 2010 received a re-LDLT and one received a second re-LDLT. The overall re-LDLT rate was 3.5%. All candidates had re-LDLT after the initial LDLT. The overall actuarial survival of these patients was 83.3% and 83.3% at one and five yr, respectively. These rates are significantly worse than the rates of pediatric first LDLT. Vascular complications occurred in four patients and were successfully treated by interventional radiologic therapy. There were no post-operative biliary complications. One case expired because of hemophagocytic syndrome after re-LDLT. Although pediatric re-LDLT is medically, ethically, and economically controversial, it is a feasible option and should be offered to children with irreversible graft failure. Further investigations, including multicenter studies, are therefore essential to identify any prognostic factors that may improve the present poor outcome after re-LDLT.

Identifying the futile pediatric liver re-transplant in the PELD era

Survival following pediatric re-transplant is inferior to that following primary transplant. We analyzed UNOS data (1987-2007) to identify factors associated with poor outcomes following re-transplant in both the pre-PELD and PELD eras. There may be a combination of factors associated with a futile pediatric liver re-transplant. Identification of these factors may improve allograft allocation and survival following re-transplantation. Abstract: Survival following pediatric liver re-transplant is distinctly inferior to that following primary transplant. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with futile pediatric liver re-transplants before and after introduction of the PELD criteria in February 2002. We analyzed the UNOS database (1987-2008) and identified pediatric patients requiring liver re-transplants before and after PELD criteria. Descriptive characteristics were evaluated and survival analyzed with Cox proportional hazards method. Analysis of 1248 children identified re-transplant survival in the PELD era was significantly better than the pre-PELD era. Multivariable analysis in the pre-PELD era identified number of re-transplants, African American race, ICU pretransplant, recipient weight, creatinine and bilirubin levels, donor age, and cold ischemia time to be significantly associated with poor survival. In the PELD era, ICU hospitalization, weight, and very high bilirubin levels were associated with poor survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis by risk groups demonstrated a significant difference in survival, with the highest risk group experiencing 40-50% one-yr survival. Survival following pediatric liver re-transplantation varies significantly by era and associated risk factors. There may be a combination of factors that predict a futile re-transplant. Pre-operative identification of these factors may improve allograft allocation and recipient survival following re-transplantation.

Pediatric liver retransplantation: Outcomes and a prognostic scoring tool

Nine to twenty-nine percent of pediatric liver transplant recipients require retransplantation. No previous pediatric study has proposed a prognostic scoring system. We have used the United Network for Organ Sharing transplantation database to conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients who were less than 18 years of age when they received their retransplant (n = 1130). Using a random two-thirds of the subjects, we developed a prognostic scoring system by performing a multivariate Cox analysis with non-laboratory clinical characteristics. The scoring system was verified in the remaining one-third of the subjects. Stratifying the verification group into risk groups by prognostic score demonstrated its predictive value. Those in the low-risk category had survival similar to that of primary liver transplant recipients. Those in the high-risk category had 2.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.6-3.7) times the risk of death or retransplantation as those in the low-risk category. Risk factors in the scoring system included being on life support at the time of retransplant, receiving a split liver graft, and having an original diagnosis of neonatal cholestasis, familial cholestasis, paucity of bile ducts, or congenital abnormalities. Protective factors in the scoring system included older age at the time of transplantation and having acute rejection contribute to graft failure. In conclusion, with simple clinical characteristics, this scoring tool can modestly discriminate between those children at high risk and those children at low risk of poor outcome after liver retransplantation.

Pediatric Liver Retransplantation: Indications and Outcome

Introduction Liver transplantation is the only treatment for end-stage liver disease. Not all patients have a favorable outcome. Graft failure secondary to primary nonfunction, vascular complications, or chronic rejection among other problems may lead to retransplantation. Retransplantation represents 8% to 29% of liver transplantations in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to present our experience with retransplanted children by analyzing the indications and the results. Methods All patients were prospectively included in our database, including 125 children. We included the indications for retransplantation, complications, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Results Since 1994, 125 patients were transplanted and 25 were retransplanted (20%), including 5 who received a third graft. Primary nonfunction represented 30% of the indications for retransplantation and hepatic artery thrombosis, 20%. Six of 25 patients who received a first retransplantation and 2 of 5 who received a second retransplantation died. The most frequent cause of death was multiorgans failure. The survivals at 1 and 5 years were 82% and 76% for children receiving a first retransplantation, and 60% at 1 and 5 years for those who received a second retransplantation. Conclusions Organ failure after liver transplantation was a common event in pediatric transplantation. Survival was similar between patients transplanted once and those who received one retransplantation. Survival decreased among patients who received a third graft but was maintained at 60%, which is better than most published results for first retransplanted patients. Retransplantation is a valid option with good results for selected pediatric cases.

Outcomes for pediatric liver retransplantation from living donors.

The only therapeutic option for patients with a failing allograft is retransplantation. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a well-accepted therapeutic option for end-stage liver disease, but retransplantation from a living donor (Re-LDLT) has not previously been discussed. A total of 547 LDLTs were performed in 519 children (<18 years old) at Kyoto University Hospital from June 1990 to October 2002. During the same study period, a total of 28 Re-LDLTs were performed in 27 recipients (Re-LDLT performed twice in 1 patient). Patient survival was analyzed with respect to various preoperative factors, such as functional status, pretransplantation apheresis, cause of primary graft failure, interval from primary to subsequent transplants, and laboratory values of total bilirubin and creatinine. Kaplan-Meier survival rate from the date of Re-LDLT to 1 year was 47.6%. Functional status, pretransplantation apheresis, interval to Re-LDLT, and bilirubin and creatinine levels all exerted an adverse impact on survival after Re-LDLT. Pathologically proven major causes of primary graft failure were chronic rejection (n=10, 35.7%), chronic cholangitis (n=6, 21.4%), and vascular complications (n=7, 25.0%). Among these causes, vascular complications displayed the strongest adverse impact on survival, compared with chronic cholangitis and chronic rejection (1-year survival was 35.7% in vascular complications; 66.7% in chronic cholangitis; and 60.0% in chronic rejection). Re-LDLT can save patients with a failing allograft. To achieve better results after Re-LDLT, further investigations are necessary to understand the factors leading to poor outcome after Re-LDLT.