Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Physicians Research Articles

Pediatric intensive care unit follow-up: Thinking before acting

ObjectiveIt is now well established that post-intensive care syndrome is frequent in critically ill children after discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Nevertheless, post-intensive care follow-up is highly heterogenous worldwide and is not considered routine care in many countries. The purpose of this viewpoint was to report the reflections of the French PICU society working group on how to implement post-PICU follow-up. MethodsA working group was set up within the Groupe Francophone de Reanimation et d’Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) to provide conceptual and practical guidance for developing post-PICU follow-up. The working group included psychologists, PICU physicians, physiotherapists, and nurses, from different French PICUs. Five virtual meetings have been held. ResultsFirst, we described in this work the objectives of the follow-up program and the population to be targeted. We also provided a framework to implement post-PICU follow-up in clinical practice. Finally, we detailed the potential obstacles and challenges to consider. ConclusionAlthough implementing a post-PICU follow-up program is a challenge, the benefits could be significant for both patient and relatives, as well as for the health care professionals involved.

Mitigation and Outcomes of Difficult Bag-Mask Ventilation in Critically Ill Children

AbstractDifficult bag-mask ventilation (BMV) occurs in 10% of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) tracheal intubations (TI). The reasons clinicians identify difficult BMV in the PICU and the interventions used to mitigate that difficulty have not been well-studied. This is a prospective, observational, single-center study. A patient-specific data form was sent to PICU physicians supervising TIs from November 2019 through December 2020 to identify the presence of difficult BMV, attempted interventions used, and perceptions about intervention success. The dataset was linked and merged with the local TI quality database to assess safety outcomes. Among 305 TIs with response (87% response rate), 267 (88%) clinicians performed BMV during TI. Difficult BMV was reported in 28 of 267 patients (10%). Commonly reported reasons for difficult BMV included: facial structure (50%), high inspiratory pressure (36%), and improper mask fit (21%). Common interventions were jaw thrust (96%) and an airway adjunct (oral airway 50%, nasal airway 7%, and supraglottic airway 11%), with ventilation improvement in 44% and 73%, respectively. Most difficult BMV was identified before neuromuscular blockade (NMB) administration (96%) and 67% (18/27) resolved after NMB administration. The overall success in improving ventilation was 27/28 (96%). TI adverse outcomes (hemodynamic events, emesis, and/or hypoxemia <80%) are associated with the presence of difficult BMV (10/28, 36%) versus non-difficult BMV (20/239, 8%, p< 0.001). Difficult BMV is common in critically ill children and is associated with increased TI adverse outcomes. Airway adjunct placement and NMB use are often effective in improving ventilation.

Perspectives of Pediatric Nephrologists, Intensivists and Nurses Regarding AKI Management and Expected Outcomes.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill children is associated with increased risk for short- and long-term adverse outcomes. Currently, there is no systematic follow-up for children who develop AKI in intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to assess variation regarding management, perceived importance, and follow-up of AKI in the ICU setting within and between healthcare professional (HCP) groups. Anonymous, cross-sectional, web-based surveys were administered nationally to Canadian pediatric nephrologists, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) physicians, and PICU nurses, via professional listservs. All Canadian pediatric nephrologists, PICU physicians, and nurses treating children in the ICU were eligible for the survey. N/A. Surveys included multiple choice and Likert scale questions on current practice related to AKI management and long-term follow-up, including institutional and personal practice approaches, and perceived importance of AKI severity with different outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed. Categorical responses were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests; Likert scale results were compared using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Surveys were completed by 34/64 (53%) pediatric nephrologists, 46/113 (41%) PICU physicians, and 82 PICU nurses (response rate unknown). Over 65% of providers reported hemodialysis to be prescribed by nephrology; a mix of nephrology, ICU, or a shared nephrology-ICU model was reported responsible for peritoneal dialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Severe hyperkalemia was the most important renal replacement therapy (RRT) indication for both nephrologists and PICU physicians (Likert scale from 0 [not important] to 10 [most important]; median = 10, 10, respectively). Nephrologists reported a lower threshold of AKI for increased mortality risk; 38% believed stage 2 AKI was the minimum compared to 17% of PICU physicians and 14% of nurses. Nephrologists were more likely than PICU physicians and nurses to recommend long-term follow-up for patients who develop any AKI during ICU stay (Likert scale from 0 [none] to 10 [all patients]; mean=6.0, 3.8, 3.7, respectively) (P < .05). Responses from all eligible HCPs in the country could not obtained. There may be differences in opinions between HCPs that completed the survey compared to those that did not. Additionally, the cross-sectional design of our study may not adequately reflect changes in guidelines and knowledge since survey completion, although no specific guidelines have been released in Canada since survey dissemination. Canadian HCP groups have variable perspectives on pediatric AKI management and follow-up. Understanding practice patterns and perspectives will help optimize pediatric AKI follow-up guideline implementation.

Organizational characteristics of European pediatric onco-critical care: An international cross-sectional survey.

Intensified treatment protocols have improved survival of pediatric oncology patients. However, these treatment protocols are associated with increased treatment-related morbidity requiring admission to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We aimed to describe the organizational characteristics and processes of care for this patient group across PICUs in Europe. A web-based survey was sent to PICU directors or representative physicians between February and June 2021. Responses were obtained from 77 PICUs of 12 European countries. Organizational characteristics were similar across the different countries of Europe. The median number of PICU beds was 12 (IQR 8-16). The majority of the PICUs was staffed by pediatric intensivists and had a 24/7 intensivist coverage. Most PICUs had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:1 or 1:2. The median numbers of yearly planned and unplanned PICU admissions of pediatric cancer patients were 20 (IQR 10-45) and 10 (IQR 10-30, respectively. Oncology specific practices within PICU were less common in participating centres. This included implementation of oncology protocols in PICU (30%), daily rounds of PICU physicians on the wards (13%), joint mortality and morbidity meetings or complex patients' discussions (30% and 40%, respectively) and participation of parents during clinical rounds (40%). Our survey provides an overview on the delivery of critical care for oncology patients in PICU across European countries. Multidisciplinary care for these vulnerable and challenging patients remains complex and challenging. Future studies need to determine the effects of differences in PICU organization and processes of care on patients' outcome.

Italian Version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: Evaluation of the Scale Reliability and Ability to Detect Delirium Compared to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Physicians Clinical Evaluation

BackgroundDelirium is an acute brain dysfunction associated with increased length of hospitalization, mortality, and high healthcare costs especially in patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) is a screening tool for evaluating delirium in pediatric patients. This tool has already been used and validated in other languages but not in Italian.ObjectivesTo test the reliability of the Italian version of the CAPD to screen PICU patients for delirium and to assess the agreement between CAPD score and PICU physician clinical evaluation of delirium.MethodsProspective double-blinded observational cohort study of patients admitted to a tertiary academic center PICU for at least 48 h from January 2020 to August 2021. We evaluated intra- and inter-rater agreement using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The ability of the scale to detect delirium was evaluated by comparing the nurses’ CAPD assessments with the clinical evaluation of a PICU physician with expertise in analgosedation using the area under the ROC curve (AUC).Measurements and Main ResultsSeventy patients were included in the study. The prevalence of pediatric delirium was 54% (38/70) when reported by a positive CAPD score and 21% (15/70) when diagnosed by the PICU physician. The CAPD showed high agreement levels both for the intra-rater (ICC 1 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99) and the inter-rater (ICC 2 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.96) assessments. In patients with suspected delirium according to the CAPD scale, the observed sensitivity and specificity of the scale were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.68–1.00) and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.42–0.70), respectively. The AUC observed was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66–0.8490).ConclusionThe Italian version of the CAPD seems a reliable tool for the identification of patients at high risk of developing delirium in pediatric critical care settings. Compared to the clinical evaluation of the PICU physician, the use of the CAPD scale avoids a possible underestimation of delirium in the pediatric population.

Safe transfer of pediatric patients from hematopoietic stem cell transplant unit into the pediatric intensive care unit: views of nurses and physicians.

Sufficient communication between hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) teams is pivotal for a successful advanced support in the PICU for HSCT-related complications. We evaluated perceived communication and barriers between both teams with the aim of providing recommendations for improvement. In this cross-sectional survey, a self-designed online questionnaire was distributed among ESPNIC and EBMT members. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Over half of HSCT respondents employed a transfer indication protocol and patient assessment tool, but less structured checklist prior to patient transfer. Nearly all PICU respondents perceived this checklist as improvement for communication. Most HSCT and PICU physicians have daily rounds upon patient transfer while this is mostly missing between nursing teams. Half of both HSCT and PICU nurses indicated that HSCT training for PICU nurses could improve communication and patient transfer. Most respondents indicated that structured meetings between HSCT and PICU nurses could improve communication. Overall there is good communication between HSCT and PICU units, although barriers were noted between members of both teams. Based on our findings, we recommend use of a structured and specific checklist by HSCT teams, HSCT training for PICU personnel, and structured meetings between HSCT and PICU nurses.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Background Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening condition that shares common features with severe sepsis. This study aimed to report the number of children with suspected HLH in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to compare clinical and laboratory criteria of patients who met the HLH criteria versus those who did not meet HLH criteria to determine the red flags suggesting HLH. Patients and methods This retrospective study included all patients admitted to the PICU of the Alexandria University Children’s Hospital in Egypt, over four years from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients were screened for the presence of fever, splenomegaly, and cytopenias; if positive, they were considered as clinically suspected HLH and included in the study. Results Among 1056 patients admitted to PICU during the study period, 54 (5.1%) patients have been identified as clinically suspected HLH. Patients’ ages ranged between 1 and 156 months with a median of 17 months. According to HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria, hyperferritinemia was present in all tested patients, hypertriglyceridemia in 63.8%, hypofibrinogenemia in 47.6%, hemophagocytosis in 25%, and elevated soluble CD25 in 84.6%. Seventeen patients (31.5%) fulfilled greater than or equal to 5 HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria, although only 13 (24.1%) patients were fully investigated. The Hscore was higher in patients meeting HLH criteria (P&lt;0.001), but the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 score was lower (P=0.08). The overall mortality was 63%; more patients (76.5%) died in the HLH group (P=0.16) with a shorter median PICU stay (P=0.03). Conclusion The present study reported the clinical characteristics of children with clinically suspected HLH in a central PICU from a low–middle-income country. HLH was not adequately investigated in PICU patients, and the mortality rate was high. Raising awareness about HLH among PICU physicians is mandatory to minimize missing the diagnosis of HLH.

Putting Prognosis First: Impact of an Intensive Care Unit Team Premeeting Curriculum.

Background: The paradigm of care has shifted in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) such that patients are frequently cared for by teams of specialists rather than the ICU attending physician solely managing care. An unintended consequence of care managed by multiple specialists is that families often receive conflicting messages from different team members, with little focus on disclosing prognosis.Objective: To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested a team communication skills training (CST) program focused on the healthcare team premeeting in which roles, purpose, and prognosis are clarified before meeting with the family. Our aim was to assess whether the team CST program was associated with increased discussion of prognosis during the team premeeting.Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational pilot study to develop and test a team CST program using a before/after design. Pediatric ICU physicians and specialists from pediatric neurology and pediatric oncology who co-led family conferences in the pediatric ICU participated in a 1-day team CST program. Team premeetings were audio-recorded and transcribed.Results: We analyzed seven pre- and 10 post-CST program audio-recorded team premeetings, which each compromised a median of eight healthcare team members. Prognosis was more likely to be discussed in post-CST team premeetings (10/10 vs. 3/7; P = 0.0147). Agreement on prognosis was achieved more frequently in post-CST teams compared with pre-CST teams, although the percentage of agreement did not reach significance (9/10 vs. 3/7; P = 0.1007).Conclusions: A CST program with a structured approach to conducting a team premeeting was associated with an increased discussion of prognosis among team members before convening with the family in the pediatric ICU.

Virtual Handover of Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit During the Covid-19 Crisis

ObjectiveA key measure to mitigate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been social distancing. Incorporating video-conferencing applications in the patient handover process between healthcare workers can enhance social distancing while maintaining handover elements. This study describes pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) physicians’ experience using an online video-conferencing application for handover during the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignQualitative content analysis.SettingPICU at a university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.SubjectsPICU Physicians.InterventionsDue to the pandemic, the hospital’s PICU used Zoom® as a remote conferencing application instead of a face-to-face handover. Following institutional review board approval, data were collected over two weeks (1 Jul 2020 to 14 Jul 2020).MeasurementsAn online survey was conducted using open-ended questions to capture demographic data and the perceived efficacy of remote handovers. Thematic framework analysis process included open coding, creating categories, and abstraction.Main ResultsAll 37 PICU physicians who participated in the handover completed the survey. The participants comprised six attendings, nine specialists, and 22 residents. While 20 (54.1%) physicians reported attending 1–5 Zoom handovers by the time of the study, some (n. 6, 16.2%) had more than ten virtual handovers. They had variable previous teleconferencing experiences. Most physicians (78.4%) were comfortable conducting a remote handover. Most found that Situation–Background–Assessment–Recommendation handover elements were properly achieved through this remote handover process. The perceived advantages of online handover included fewer interruptions, time efficiency, and facilitation of social distancing. The perceived disadvantages were the paucity of nonverbal communication and teaching during virtual meetings.ConclusionVideo-conferencing applications for online handovers could supplement traditional face-to-face intensive care unit patient handover during outbreaks of infectious diseases. The use of video streaming and more emphasis on teaching should be encouraged to optimize the users’ experience.

The Association between Therapeutic Alliance and Parental Health Outcomes following a Child's Death in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Therapeutic alliance reflects the strength and quality of the physician-patient/family relationship. We investigated the association between therapeutic alliance and bereaved parents' mental health and perceived overall health following their child's death in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Bereaved parents were surveyed 6 months after their child's death in a PICU affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. Parents were evaluated for complicated grief, depression, and post-traumatic stress using the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), and the Short Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Rating Interview (SPRINT), respectively. Overall health was evaluated using a single item. Therapeutic alliance between parents and their deceased child's PICU physicians was assessed using the Human Connection scale (HCS). Two hundred and thirty-five parents of 158 deceased children completed surveys. Mean ICG score was 34.4 ± 14.9 with 142 (60.4%) parents screening positive for complicated grief. Mean PHQ-8 score was 9.1 ± 6.2 with 102 (43.4%) screening positive for at least moderate depression. Mean SPRINT score was 14.6 ± 8.2 with 122 (51.9%) screening positive for post-traumatic stress disorder. Overall health was perceived as fair for 47 (20.0%) parents and poor for 10 (4.3%). Using multivariable modeling, higher HCS score (greater therapeutic alliance) was significantly associated with lower (better) ICG score (-0.23, 95% CI -0.42, -0.04, p = 0.018). HCS score was not significantly associated with PHQ-8, SPRINT, or overall health scores. We conclude that bereaved parents experience a high level of adverse mental health symptoms including complicated grief, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Greater therapeutic alliance with PICU physicians may lessen symptoms of complicated grief during bereavement.

P0748 / #2018: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF SIX PEDIATRIC INTENSIVISTS IN AN ADULT INTENSIVE CARE UNIT DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aims & Objectives: Covid-19 was declared a Public Health Emergency on January 30, 2020. This pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare systems around the world and organizational changes have been necessary. The objective of this study is to describe the experiences lived by PICU (Pediatric Intensive care Unit) attending physicians who had to practice in the adult intensive care unit (ICU) during covid-19 pandemic. Methods: Observational, descriptive, transversal and retrospective study. Description of the paediatric consultant experiences between March and May 2020, while attending covid-19 adults in a ICU of a tertiary hospital in Madrid were included. Results: The team consisted of six PICU physicians. Was a full time job position with five additional 24 hours shifts per month. By the end of May, 3007 covid-19 patients were admitted to the hospital and 250 to the adult ICU. The number of ICU beds were increased to 150, compared with 30 pre-covid ICU beds. The high complexity of covid-19 patients, along with the elevated number of cases, fostered collaboration between pediatric and adult intensivists. During the teamwork, paediatricians were able to perform techniques such as orotracheal intubation, vascular access or tracheostomy, and were independent in adult ICU management of ECMO, hemofiltration, or comorbidities such as hypertension, obesity and diabetes. Conclusions: Hospitals have been able to expand their capacity in terms of ICU beds. Shortages of equipment and staff has been a major problem. PICU physicians can be of great value in supporting adult ICUs. However, this may have limitations and implications for clinical practice. Additional studies with objective data are required.

Simulation to Train Pediatric ICU Teams in Endotracheal Intubation of Patients with COVID-19.

We conducted a quality improvement study in a tertiary referral PICU. After developing stakeholder-driven guidelines for modified intubation in this population, we implemented a structured simulation program to train PICU physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists. We directly observed PICU teams' adherence to the modified intubation process before and after simulation sessions and compared participants' confidence using the Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified (SET-M, Likert scale range 0: do not agree to 2: strongly agree regarding statements of confidence). Fifty unique PICU staff members participated in 9 simulation sessions. Observed intubation performance improved, with teams executing a mean of 7.3-8.4 out of 9 recommended practices between simulation attempts (P = 0.024). Before undergoing simulation, PICU staff indicated that overall they did not feel prepared to intubate patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (mean SET-M score 0.9). After the simulation program, PICU staff confidence improved (mean SET-M score increased from 0.9 to 2, P < 0.001). PICU teams' performance and confidence in safely executing a modified endotracheal intubation process for children with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection improved using a rapidly deployed structured simulation education program.

Critically Ill Pediatric Oncology Patients: What the Intensivist Needs to Know? Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

Cancer is an evolving cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide. In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the survival of children with cancer, after applying new methods and treatment protocols in practice. However, the complexity of the disease itself, as well as the intensity and toxicity of treatment is such that many children require admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) which should be well equipped and led by personnel who have adequate training and expertise to provide optimum care to these complex patients. Most oncology patients who require PICU admission categorized into oncological emergencies, and/or decompensation from treatment and its side effects. In this study, we provide a summary of the essential and most recent evidence-based recommendations from published reviews and articles to aid PICU physicians and to ensure the best treatment and outcome possible for the children with such disease.How to cite this article: Al Haj Moussa A, Maaz AUR, Faqih N, Sundaram M. Critically Ill Pediatric Oncology Patients: What the Intensivist Needs to Know? Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(12):1256–1263.

Friend or Foe: Perceptions of Infectious Disease Specialists as Stewards and Social Determinants of Antimicrobial Prescribing

Background: Inappropriate prescribing behavior can be associated with higher rates of antibiotic resistance, calling for detailed studies on how physicians make prescribing decisions. We conducted a mixed-methods study to investigate physician antibiotic prescribing behavior in a 141-bed pediatric hospital. Methods: We applied a mixed-methods research design. The quantitative phase was conducted over a 6-month period to identify cases of inappropriate prescribing. The qualitative phase comprised 22 qualitative interviews with clinical teaching units (CTU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) team members (physicians and pharmacists). Two coders analyzed the data deductively using the theoretical domain framework (TDF), as well as the social determinants of antimicrobial prescribing (SDAP). Results: In 52.9% of the 36 identified cases in the CTU and 31.4% of the 37 cases in the PICU, an infectious diseases (ID) consultation occurred. Compliance rates with ID recommendations were 79% and 91% in the CTU and PICU, respectively. The CTU and PICU expressed appreciation for ID involvement when ID supported their de-escalation choices in complex cases and in cases in which less commonly known antibiotics were used. However, the ID service involvement was perceived as detrimental to antimicrobial prescribing decisions for CTU and PICU across 3 of the 4 SDAP domains (Fig. 1, qualitative research quotes). Relationship between clinicians: CTU physicians and pharmacists perceived ID involvement as negatively impacting the relationship of the team. Antimicrobial decisions were automatically defaulted to ID, whereas pharmacy involvement was disregarded and the decisions were delayed. Risk, fear, and emotion: These were experienced across all respondents’ groups that identified ID specialists’ egos and personalities as contrary to open collaborative discussion on antimicrobial decisions. (Mis)perception of the problem: ID physicians were identified as more conservative in their antimicrobial choices, leading to prolonged duration of treatment, broader choices, and longer hospitalizations. The CTU and pharmacy respondents felt that ID recommendations were inconsistent among physicians and deviated from guidelines with little justification. Conclusions: Although CTU and PICU teams tend to comply with ID prescribing recommendations and ID involvement with complicated cases, pharmacists, CTU physicians, and PICU physicians perceived ID consultations to negatively affect collaborative efforts for stewardship. These findings offer novel insights into how an ID service can improve its role to positively affect appropriate prescribing. CTU and PICU respondents called for a supportive and trusting relationship with the ID service as a major driver for behavioral change and enhanced stewardship.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Continuous EEG in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Adherence to Monitoring Criteria and Barriers to Adequate Implementation.

Subclinical seizures are common in critically ill children and are best detected by continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring. Timely detection of seizures requires pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) physicians to identify patients at risk of seizures and request cEEG monitoring. A recent consensus statement from the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) outlines the indications for cEEG monitoring in critically ill patients. However, adherence to these cEEG monitoring criteria among PICU physicians is unknown. Our project had two goals: 1. To assess adherence to cEEG monitoring indications and barriers toward their implementation; 2. To improve compliance with the ACNS cEEG monitoring criteria in our PICU. This is a single-institution study. A total of 234 PICU admissions (183 unique patients) were studied. A 6-month retrospective chart review identified PICU patients meeting ACNS criteria for cEEG monitoring, and patients for whom monitoring was requested. This was followed by an 8-week quality improvement project. During this mentorship period, a didactic 15-min lecture and summary handouts regarding the ACNS indications for cEEG monitoring were provided to all PICU physicians. Requests for cEEG monitoring during the mentorship period were compared to baseline adherence to cEEG monitoring recommendations, and barriers toward timely cEEG monitoring were assessed. Nearly every fifth PICU patient met cEEG monitoring indications, and prevalences of patients meeting those indications were similar in the retrospective and the prospective mentorship period (18% vs. 19%). Almost all patients (98%) requiring cEEG as per ACNS criteria met the indication for monitoring already at the time of their PICU admission. During the retrospective period, 23% of patients meeting ACNS criteria had a request for cEEG monitoring, which increased to 83% during the mentorship period. The median delay to cEEG initiation was 16.7h during the mentorship period, largely due to limited hours of EEG technician availability. Electrographic seizures were identified in 36% of patients monitored, all within the first 120min of cEEG recording. The majority (79%) of cEEGs informed clinical management. A brief teaching intervention supplemented by pictographic handouts significantly increased adherence to cEEG monitoring recommendations, and cEEGs guided clinical management. However, there were long delays to cEEG initiation. In order to promptly recognize subclinical seizures in critically ill children, we strongly advocate for a routine screening for cEEG monitoring indications as part of the PICU admission process, and a care model allowing for cEEG initiation around-the-clock.

Impact of Patient Census and Admission Mortality on Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Attending Electronic Health Record Activity: A Preliminary Study.

Physicians may spend a significant amount of time using the electronic health record (EHR), but this is understudied in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The objective of this study is to quantify PICU attending physician EHR usage and determine its association with patient census and mortality scores. During the year 2016, total EHR, chart review, and documentation times of 7 PICU physicians were collected retrospectively utilizing an EHR-embedded time tracking software package. We examined associations between documentation times and patient census and maximum admission mortality scores. Odds ratios (ORs) are reported per 1-unit increase in patient census and mortality scores. Overall, total daily EHR usage time (median time [hh:mm] [25th, 75th percentile]) was 2:10 (1:31, 3:08). For all hours (8 a.m.-8 a.m.), no strong association was noted between total EHR time, chart review, and documentation times and patient census, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2), or Pediatric Risk of Mortality 3 (PRISM3) scores. For regular hours (8 a.m.-7 p.m.), no strong association was noted between total EHR, chart review, and documentation times and patient census, PIM2, or PRISM3 scores. When patient census was higher, the odds of EHR after-hour usage (7 p.m.-8 a.m.) was higher (OR 1.262 [1.135, 1.403], p < 0.0001), but there were no increased odds with PIM2 (OR 1.090 [0.956, 1.242], p = 0.20) and PRISM3 (OR 1.010 [0.984, 1.036], p = 0.47) scores. A subset of physicians spent less time performing EHR-related tasks when patient census and admission mortality scores were elevated. We performed a novel evaluation of physician EHR workflow in our PICU. Our pediatric critical care physicians spend approximately 2 hours (out of an expected 10-hour shift) each service day using the EHR, but there was no strong or consistent association between EHR usage and patient census or mortality scores. Future larger scale studies are needed to ensure validity of these results.

The occurrence of adverse events is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in children admitted to a single pediatric intensive care unit.

Healthcare can cause harm. The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and morbidity-mortality in critically ill children. A prospective cohort study was designed. All children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) between August 2016 and July 2017 were followed. An AE was considered any harm associated with a healthcare-related incident. AEs were identified in two steps: first, adverse clinical incidents (ACI) were recognized through direct observation and active surveillance by PICU physicians, and then the patient safety committee evaluated every ACI to define which would be considered an AE. The outcome was hospital morbidity-mortality. There were 467 ACI registered, 249 (53.31%) were considered AEs and the rate was 4.27/100 patient days. From the 842 children included, 142 (16.86%) suffered AEs, 39 (4.63%) experienced morbidity-mortality: 33 (3.92%) died, and 6 (0.71%) had morbidity. Multivariate analysis revealed that the occurrence of AEs was significantly associated with morbidity-mortality, OR 5.70 (CI95% 2.58-12.58, p = 0.001). This association was independent of age and severity of illness score.Conclusion: Experiencing AEs significantly increased the risk of morbidity-mortality in this cohort of PICU children.What is Known:• Many children suffer healthcare-associated harm during pediatric intensive care hospitalization.What is New:• This prospective cohort study shows that experiencing adverse events during pediatric intensive care hospitalization significantly increases the risk of morbidity and mortality independent of age and severity of illness at admission.

Interobserver Agreement on Clinical Judgment of Work of Breathing in Spontaneously Breathing Children in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Clinical assessment of the work of breathing (WOB) remains a cornerstone in respiratory support decision-making in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). In this study, we determined the interobserver agreement of 30 observers (PICU physicians and nurses) on WOB and multiple signs of effort of breathing in 10 spontaneously breathing children admitted to the PICU. By reliability analysis, the agreement on overall WOB was poor to moderate, and only three separate signs of effort of breathing (breathing rate, stridor, and grunting) showed moderate-to-good interobserver reliability. We conclude that the interobserver agreement on the clinical WOB judgment among PICU physicians and nurses is low.

NUTRI-REAPED study: nutritional assessment of French critically ill children and nutrition practice survey in French-speaking pediatric intensive care units

BackgroundImpaired nutritional status is adversely associated with suboptimal outcomes in critically ill children. Undernutrition at pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission ranges from 15 to 65%. A lack of knowledge of the nutritional status of children in French PICUs prevents us from specifically targeting education. This study aims to describe the nutritional status of children in French PICUs and to assess nutritional practices and physicians’ knowledge of nutrition, in order to focus NutriSIP (the French-speaking PICU nutrition group) future education programs. A prospective observational multicenter point prevalence study was conducted in French PICUs, recruiting all children admitted over three different weeks. Anthropometric measurements were taken (weight, height/length, mid-upper arm, and head circumferences), in order to calculate nutritional indices. Nutritional status was defined according to WHO Body Mass Index z-score and dynamic assessment based on growth faltering detection. Concurrently, PICU physicians and PICU nurses from seven French-speaking countries completed a survey to ascertain knowledge about local nutritional care practices and overall nutrition knowledge. PICU physicians’ responses were compared to PICU nurses’ responses (previously published).ResultsFour hundred and thirty-two children were included in the observational study from 27 French PICUs. Undernutrition was diagnosed in 18.5% of them, young age and underlying chronic condition being the two independent risk factors. Faltering growth was diagnosed in 4.8% and overweight in 7.4%. Subjective nutritional assessment was not accurate. Thirty-eight French-speaking PICUs completed the survey. These showed nutritional practices frequently did not comply with international guidelines, especially regarding nutritional goals, and the reasons for withholding enteral nutrition. Comparison between physicians’ and nurses’ responses to the survey showed large discrepancies.ConclusionUndernutrition is frequent at admission in French PICUs. Nutritional status should be assessed using a holistic approach, because of the potential impact on outcome. French-speaking PICU healthcare professionals need further nutrition education, in order to improve nutritional practices to comply with international recommendations. This study will serve as a baseline to focus NutriSIP teaching programs in the future.

Speaking a Different Language: A Qualitative Analysis Comparing Language of Palliative Care and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Physicians.

Family conferences in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) often include palliative care (PC) providers. We do not know how ICU communication differs when the PC team is present. To compare language used by PC team and ICU physicians during family conferences. A retrospective cohort review of ICU family conferences with and without the PC team. Forty-four bed pediatric ICU in a tertiary medical center. Nine ICU physicians and 4 PC providers who participated in 18 audio-recorded family conferences. Of the 9 transcripts without the PC team, we identified 526 ICU physician statements, generating 10 thematic categories. The most common themes were giving medical information and discussing medical options. Themes unique to ICU physicians included statements of hopelessness, insensitivity, and "health-care provider challenges." Among the 9 transcripts with the PC team, there were 280 statements, generating 10 thematic categories. Most commonly, the PC team offered statements of support, giving medical information, and quality of life. Both teams promoted family engagement by soliciting questions; however, the PC team was more likely to use open-ended questions, offer support, and discuss quality of life. Pediatric ICU physicians spend more time giving medical information, whereas the PC team more commonly offers emotional support. The addition of the PC team to ICU family conferences may provide a balanced approach to communication.