Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs Research Articles

Clinical Practice Guideline Development in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Departments Across the United States: A Cross-sectional Study.

This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the process of clinical practice guideline (CPG) development in pediatric emergency medicine departments (PEDs) across the United States, with a focus on identifying areas for improvement to enhance the quality of CPGs. An electronic survey was distributed to PEDs with pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs. Respondents were asked about their CPG development processes (ie, guideline committee composition, consideration of conflicts of interest, grading recommendations, guideline training opportunities) based on the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool as well as implementation and monitoring. Univariate analysis was used to assess associations between the number of AGREE II elements adhered to and annual patient volume. Of the 84 PEDs surveyed, 44 (52.4%) responded, representing institutions from 28 states. Most PEDs (97.7%, n = 43) reported developing their own guidelines, citing the need to improve care quality and standardize patient care as primary reasons. Although most guideline committees included multidisciplinary team members (74.4%, n = 32), routine patient involvement in committees was rare (11.6%, n = 5), and barriers such as time and resource constraints hindered their inclusion. Formal training for committee members in guideline development was uncommon (18.6%, n = 8). There was an association between higher annual patient volume and the number of AGREE II elements adhered to (P = 0.03). Few PEDs considered potential conflicts of interest among committee members (13.6%, n = 6). Over half of surveyed PEDs (54.5%, n = 24) lacked a systematic approach to grading recommendations. Educational materials and workshops were the most common guideline implementation strategies. Our findings highlight need for improvement in the CPG development process in PEDs. Including patients in committees, providing formal training for committee members, and adopting a rigorous approach to grading recommendations are crucial steps toward enhancing guideline quality. Emphasizing these improvements has the potential to improve the quality of CPGs for pediatric emergency care.

Social Care Education and Training Among US Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.

The aim of the study is to assess the association of social determinants of health (SDOH) education and social needs training on pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician perception and practices of social care. Data were derived from the 2021 National Social Care Practices Survey of PEM program directors (PDs) and fellows. Ordinal and binary logistic regression modeling were completed for educational/training factors and social care perspective and practice outcomes. A national sample of 44 PDs (49% response rate) and 109 fellows (28%) participated. A minority of fellows received SDOH education and social needs training during fellowship. Fellows and PDs with SDOH education had a 3.1 odds (95% confidence interval CI, 1.4-6.9) of screening for social needs, with 4.4 odds among fellows (95% CI, 1.2-20.7). Those with social needs training were more comfortable assessing social risk, with 2.4 odds overall (95% CI, 1.2-4.7) and 3.1 odds among fellows (95% CI, 1.4-6.7). They also had 2.4 odds overall (95% CI, 1.1-4.9) of screening for social needs, with a 2.9 odds among fellows (95% CI, 1.3-6.8). Social care education and training appear to be associated with comfort assessing social risk and social needs screening tendency among both PEM PDs and fellows. Key areas for educational interventions are identified among PEM fellows, who are uniquely positioned as clinical leaders and patient advocates.

Innovations in Disaster Preparedness Training: An Emergency Preparedness Curriculum within a Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship

Introduction:Improved understanding of pediatric emergency preparedness can ensure the safety of children during disaster events, a population that is often overlooked.1 2 One method to minimize disparities is to increase the pediatric preparedness workforce by providing education to trainees about the foundations of this field.Method:A pediatric emergency preparedness curriculum was created as part of an elective prehospital track within a pediatric emergency medicine fellowship program at a quaternary pediatric hospital.Results:The curriculum focuses on three domains: education, research, and administration. The trainee is required to participate in local and regional educational opportunities. Locally, trainees create and facilitate at least one tabletop exercise about a preparedness topic of their choice. They also attend regional and state-wide preparedness drills to foster better understanding of integrated system processes. Additional educational opportunities involve the creation of asynchronous learning modules for their division and development of just-in-time resources for disaster events. For research, they have the opportunity to pursue an original project in the field and participate in other research activities with the track director. The administration domain prepares the trainee to be a leader in the field. Trainees are active participants within the emergency department’s preparedness committee and during hospital-wide preparedness meetings. These meetings develop protocols and policies as well as educational initiatives. Fellows are also encouraged to join national collaborative preparedness efforts through the American Academy of Pediatrics and the EMSC innovation and Improvement Center (EIIC).Conclusion:This curriculum provides an introduction to and continued education about disaster preparedness to pediatric emergency fellows early in their career. Completion of the sub-track fosters future leaders in the disaster medicine field. In the future, this curriculum can be adopted by other medical training programs to expand understanding of pediatric preparedness concepts.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs

What to know about 2.0: Revisions to the pediatric emergency medicine milestones.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) adopted educational milestones for trainee assessment in 2013, as a key component of the Next Accreditation System. Two years later, the ACGME, American Board of Pediatrics (ABP), and American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) collaborated to create specialty-specific subcompetencies in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). Since that time, emerging data have demonstrated the need to revise specialty milestones. Consequently, the ACGME summoned a working group to revise the original PEM milestones. The PEM Milestones 2.0 Working Group convened in April 2021, comprising diverse representation from ACGME staff, PEM and EM attendings, PEM fellowship program directors, PEM fellows, and community members, overseen by the ACGME's vice president for milestones development. The group met virtually six times over 3 months, with concurrent independent and subgroup work, to draft the PEM Milestones 2.0 and supplemental guide. The working group's revisions generated concise descriptions of behavioral anchors to define skill acquisition more accurately; attention to the transition from residency to fellowship training; incorporation of harmonized milestones for non-patient care and non-medical knowledge domains; and increased emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion. A supplemental guide was also designed to aid programs in designing programmatic assessment related to specialty-specific milestones. The PEM Milestones 2.0 provide an updated, specialty-specific framework to guide the development and assessment of PEM fellows and training programs. Future work may focus on faculty and learner development, advancing validity evidence, strengthening content expertise, and integrating milestones with specialty-specific entrustable professional activities.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Program Directors' Viewpoint: Minimum Levels of Entrustment for Graduating Fellows and Practicing Physicians to Perform the Subspecialty's Professional Activities.

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are essential tasks physicians perform within their professions. Entrustment levels that pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship program directors (FPDs) expect graduating fellows to achieve for PEM-specific and common pediatric subspecialty EPAs remain unreported. This study aims to determine minimum entrustment levels FPDs require fellows to achieve to graduate from fellowship and to compare FPD expectations for fellows versus practicing PEM physicians. Secondary analysis of PEM-specific data from a national multispecialty cross-sectional survey of pediatric subspecialty FPDs. For 6 PEM-specific and 7 common pediatric subspecialty EPAs, PEM FPDs indicated (1) minimum entrustment levels fellows should achieve by training completion, (2) whether they would allow a fellow to graduate below these minimum levels, and (3) minimum levels for safe and effective practice by PEM physicians. Minimum levels were defined as the level that more than 80% of FPDs would not drop below. Sixty of 77 PEM FPDs (78%) completed the survey. Most respondents did not require fellows to achieve the highest level (level 5-no supervision) by graduation for any PEM-specific EPAs. The median level FPDs expected for practicing PEM physicians was 5 (trusted to perform without supervision) for EPAs 1 and 4 and level 4 (indirect supervision for complex cases) for the remaining PEM-specific EPAs. Minimum levels expected by FPDs for common subspecialty pediatric EPAs were lower for both groups. Most PEM FPDs indicated that they would graduate fellows before their achievement of the highest entrustment level for all EPAs. Most also indicated that they do not expect practicing PEM physicians to perform all EPAs without supervision. These findings indicate need for stakeholders to evaluate current structure and outcomes of PEM fellowship programs and for institutions and organizations to ensure adequate support in time and resources for ongoing learning for practicing PEM physicians.

Increased Fellow Scholarly Publication Rate After Implementation of a Comprehensive Research Curriculum and Milestone-Based Research Timeline for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows.

Pediatric subspecialty fellows are required to complete a scholarly product during training; however, many do not bring the work to publication. To amplify our fellows' publication success, our pediatric emergency medicine fellowship program implemented a comprehensive research curriculum and established a milestone-based research timeline for each component of a project. Our objective was to assess whether these interventions increased the publication rate and enhanced the graduated fellows' perceived ability to perform independent research. Our study was conducted at a tertiary children's hospital affiliated with an academic university, enrolling 3 fellows each year in its pediatric emergency medicine program. A comprehensive research curriculum and a milestone-based research timeline were implemented in 2011. We analyzed the publication rate of our graduating fellows before (2004-2011) and after (2012-2016) our intervention. In addition, in 2017 we surveyed our previous fellows who graduated from 2004 to 2016 and analyzed factors favoring manuscript publication and confidence with various research skills. During the study period, 38 trainees completed the fellowship program. Publication rate increased from 26% ± 17% to 87% ± 30 % ( P < 0.05). When scoring the importance of various factors, fellows most valued mentorship (5 ± 0 vs 4.3 ± 1.0, P < 0.05, postintervention vs preintervention) for the completion of the fellowship study and manuscript. Fellows after the intervention reported greater confidence in performing an analysis of variance (89% vs 36%, odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-150.1). Implementation of a comprehensive research curriculum and a milestone-based research timeline was associated with an increase in the publication rate within 3 years of graduation of our pediatric emergency medicine fellows. After implementation, fellows reported an increased importance of mentorship and greater confidence in performing an analysis of variance. We provide a comprehensive curriculum and a research timeline that may serve as a model for other fellowship programs.

Pediatric Residency Preparedness for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship.

The aim of the study was to examine the perception of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) program directors (PDs), associate PDs (APDs) and first-year fellows regarding the preparedness of new PEM fellows who have graduated from pediatric residency programs. Unique surveys were created and electronically distributed to PEM PDs/APDs and first-year PEM fellows. Individual and institutional demographic information was collected. Using a 5-point Likert scale, survey items centered the perceived preparedness of first-year PEM fellows within 5 domains: professionalism, independence/autonomy, psychomotor skills, clinical evaluation and management, and academia/scholarship. Forty percent (48/119) of eligible PDs and APDs and 56% (82/147) of eligible first-year PEM fellows responded. Most PDs/APDs strongly agreed or agreed that incoming fellows perform adequately in areas of professionalism, independence/autonomy, and clinical evaluation and management. The PDs/APDs perceived fellows to be less prepared in the academia/scholarship domain and several psychomotor skills. Most first-year PEM fellows perceived themselves as prepared in areas of professionalism and clinical evaluation and management. Fellows had varied feelings of preparedness in the domains of independence/autonomy, psychomotor skills, and academia/scholarship. Overall, most PDs/APDs (54%) and fellows (84%) feel that pediatric residency training was strong or very strong. Most respondents in both groups felt that in general, pediatric residency programs adequately train residents for PEM fellowship. Both groups felt that the strengths of general pediatric training were among the domains of professionalism and clinical evaluation and management, whereas psychomotor skills and academia and scholarship were areas of improvement. These findings may be used by general pediatric residency and PEM fellowship programs to guide curriculum development.

Social care practices and perspectives among U.S. pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs.

The emergence of social emergency medicine-the incorporation of social context into the structure and practice of emergency care-has brought forth greater embracement of the social determinants of health by medical professionals, yet workforce practices and training have remained elusive. Academic literature particularly in the field of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship training is lacking relative to general pediatrics and adult emergency medicine. The primary objective of this study was to assess the social care knowledge, perspectives, and training of PEM program directors (PDs) and fellows across a national cross-sectional sample. A secondary aim was to uncover key actionable areas for the development of social care curricula in PEM training programs. A social care practices assessment tool was developed via snowball sampling interviews among clinician researcher experts and disseminated to PEM PDs and fellows nationally in accredited academic PEM training institutions. A total of 153 participants-44 PDs (49% response rate) and 109 fellows (28%)-completed the assessment tool. Responses among PDs and fellows were highly concordant. Only 12% reported regular use of a standardized social needs screening tool. The majority felt unprepared to assist families with social needs and less than half felt comfortable talking to families about social need. At the same time, social care was highly valued by 73% of participants. All participants felt that providing social care training during PEM fellowship would be beneficial. PDs and fellows identified five priority areas for PEM curricular development. PEM PDs and fellows have an overall favorable perception of social care yet report significant deficits in current practice organization and training. This study is part of a larger national collaborative advocacy project to organize and advance social care delivery across academic PEM training institutions through evidence-based approaches, best practices, and expert consensus.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.

Guiding Fellows to Independent Practice: Current Trends in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow Supervision.

Recent studies highlight the importance of physician readiness to practice beyond graduate training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates that pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows be prepared for independent practice by allowing "progressive responsibility for patient care." Prior unpublished surveys of program directors (PDs) indicate variability in approaches to provide opportunities for more independent practice during fellowship training. The aims of the study were to describe practices within PEM fellowship programs allowing fellows to work without direct supervision and to identify any barriers to independent practice in training. An anonymous electronic survey of PEM fellowship PDs was performed. Survey items were developed using an iterative modified Delphi process and pilot tested. Close-ended survey responses and demographic variables were summarized with descriptive statistics. Responses to open-ended survey items were reviewed and categorized by theme. Seventy two of 84 PDs (88%) responded to the survey; however, not all surveys were completed. Of the 68 responses to whether fellows could work without direct supervision (as defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) during some part of their training, 31 (45.6%) reported that fellows did have this opportunity. In most programs, clinical independence was conditional on specific measures including the number of clinical hours completed, milestone achievement, and approval by the clinical competency committee. Reported barriers to fellow practice without direct oversight included both regulatory and economic constraints. Current training practices that provide PEM fellows with conditional clinical independence are variable. Future work should aim to determine best practices of entrustment, identify ideal transition points, and mitigate barriers to graduated responsibility.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Procedural Sedation Training: Consensus Educational Guidelines.

Pediatric procedural sedation (PPS) is a core clinical competency of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship training mandated by both the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Pediatrics. Neither of these certifying bodies, however, offers specific guidance with regard to attaining and evaluating proficiency in trainees. Recent publications have revealed inconsistency in educational approaches, attending oversight, PPS service rotation experiences, and evaluation practices among PEM fellowship programs. A select group of PEM experts in PPS, PEM fellowship directors, PEM physicians with educational roles locally and nationally, PEM fellows, and recent PEM fellowship graduates collaborated to address this opportunity for improvement. This consensus driven educational guideline was developed to outline PPS core topics, evaluation methodology, and resources to create or modify a PPS curriculum for PEM fellowship programs. This curriculum was developed to map to fellowship Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies and to use multiple modes of dissemination to meet the needs of diverse programs and learners. Implementation and utilization of a standardized PPS curriculum as outlined in this educational guideline will equip PEM fellows with a comprehensive PPS knowledge base. Pediatric emergency medicine fellows should graduate with the competence and confidence to deliver safe and effective PPS care. Future study after implementation of the guideline is warranted to determine its efficacy.

Virtual Interviewing for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship-A National Survey.

This study aimed to evaluate both applicant and interviewer satisfaction with the virtual interviewing process for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship in hopes to improve the fellowship interviewing process. It was proposed that fellowship programs and applicants would prefer virtual interviews over traditional interviews. A survey developed in collaboration with UT Southwestern PEM fellowship leaders and national PEM leaders was sent to all PEM fellowship applicants and programs at the conclusion of the 2020 interview season and rank list submission. The applicant survey obtained information on ease of virtual interviews and whether applicants felt that they obtained adequate information from virtual interviews to make informed program selections. Program director surveys collected data on thoughts and feelings about virtual interviews and obstacles encountered during the recruitment season. Both surveys asked about costs for interviews and interview type preference. A response rate of 49% from applicants and 47% from programs was obtained. Virtual interview days were similar in the amount of time and staff hours used compared with traditional days. Applicants spent less on virtual interviews compared with those who underwent traditional interviews (average $725 vs $4312). Programs received more applications than the prior year and spent less money during the virtual cycle. The majority of the applicants (90%) were comfortable with the virtual interview platform, and most (66%) agreed that virtual interviews provided adequate information to determine program rank. Geography was the number 1 rank determining factor. Programs and applicants preferred a form of in-person interviews. Virtual interviews provide cost savings for both applicants and programs. Despite this, both parties prefer a form of in-person interviews.

Design of a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum for pediatric emergency medicine fellows: A Delphi study.

There has been a steady increase in the growth and utilization of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). POCUS has been established as an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core requirement for accreditation of PEM fellowship programs. Despite this requirement, training guidelines regarding POCUS knowledge and skills have yet to be developed. The purpose of this project was to develop a curriculum and a competency checklist for PEM fellow POCUS education. We formed a core leadership group based on expertise in one or more key areas: PEM, POCUS, curriculum development, or Delphi methods. We recruited 29 PEM POCUS or ultrasound education experts from North America to participate in a three-round electronic Delphi project. The first Delphi round asked experts to generate a list of the core POCUS knowledge and skills that a PEM fellow would need during training to function as an autonomous practitioner. Subsequent rounds prioritized the list of knowledge and skills, and the core leadership group organized knowledge and skills into global competencies and subcompetencies. The first Delphi round yielded 61 POCUS areas of knowledge and skills considered important for PEM fellow learning. After two subsequent Delphi rounds, the list of POCUS knowledge and skills was narrowed to 38 items that addressed elements of six global competencies. The core leadership group then revised items into subcompetencies and categorized them under global competencies, developing a curriculum that defined the scope (depth of content) and sequence (order of teaching) of these POCUS knowledge and skill items. This expert, consensus-generated POCUS curriculum provides detailed guidance for PEM fellowships to incorporate POCUS education into their programs. Our curriculum also identifies core ultrasound knowledge and skills needed by PEM fellows to perform the specific POCUS applications recommended in prior publications.

Pediatric emergency medicine fellowship point-of-care ultrasound training in 2020.

The primary objective was to survey pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) leaders and fellows regarding point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training in PEM fellowship programs, including teaching methods, training requirements, and applications taught. Secondary objectives were to compare fellows' and program leaders' perceptions of fellow POCUS competency and training barriers. This was a cross-sectional survey of U.S. PEM fellows and fellowship program leaders of the 78 fellowship programs using two online group-specific surveys exploring five domains: program demographics; training strategies and requirements; perceived competency; barriers, strengths, and weaknesses of POCUS training; and POCUS satisfaction. Eighty-three percent (65/78) of programs and 53% (298/558) of fellows responded. All participating PEM fellowship programs included POCUS training in their curriculum. Among the 65 programs, 97% of programs and 92% of programs utilized didactics and supervised scanning shifts as educational techniques, respectively. Sixty percent of programs integrated numerical benchmarks and 49% of programs incorporated real-time, hands-on demonstration as training requirements. Of the 19 POCUS applications deemed in the literature as core requirements for fellows, at least 75% of the 298 fellows reported training in 13 of those applications. Although less than half of fellows endorsed competency for identifying intussusception, ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis, and transvaginal pregnancy evaluation, a higher proportion of leaders reported fellows as competent for these applications (40% vs. 68%, p≤ 0.001; 21% vs. 39%, p=0.003; and 21% vs. 43%, p≤0.001). Forty-six percent of fellows endorsed a lack of PEM POCUS evidence as a training barrier compared to 31% of leaders (p=0.02), and 39% of leaders endorsed a lack of local financial support as a training barrier compared to 23% of fellows (p=0.01). Although most PEM fellowship programs provide POCUS training, there is variation in content and requirements. Training does conform to many of the expert recommended guidelines; however, there are some discrepancies and perceived barriers to POCUS training remain.

Milestones comparisons from residency to pediatric emergency medicine fellowship: Resetting expectations.

Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowships accept trainees who have completed a residency in either emergency medicine (EM) or pediatrics and have adopted 17 subcompetencies with accompanying set of milestones from these two residency programs. This study aims to examine the changes in milestone scores among common subcompetencies from the end of EM or pediatrics residency to early PEM fellowship and evaluates time to reattainment of scores for subcompetencies in which a decline was noted. This is a national, retrospective cohort study of trainees enrolled in PEM fellowship programs from July 2014 to June 2018. PEM fellowship program directors voluntarily submitted deidentified milestone reports within the study time frame, including end-of-residency reports. Descriptive analyses of milestone scores between end of residency and PEM fellowship were performed. Forty-eight U.S. PEM fellowship programs (65%) provided fellowship milestone data on 638 fellows, 218 (34%) of whom also had end-of-residency milestone scores submitted. Of 218 fellows eligible for analysis, 210 (96%) had completed a pediatrics residency and eight (4%) had completed an EM residency. Pediatric-trained fellows had statistically significant decreases in mean milestone scores in all 10 shared subcompetencies. Reattainment of milestone scores across all common subcompetencies for both EM and pediatric-trained PEM fellows occurred by the end of fellowship. This study demonstrated declines in milestone scores from the end of primary residency training in pediatrics to early PEM fellowship in shared subcompetencies, which may suggest that performance expectations are reset at the beginning of PEM fellowship. Changes in subcompetency milestone anchors to provide subspecialty-specific context may be needed to more accurately define skills acquisition in the residency-to-fellowship transition.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.

Milestone achievements in a national sample of pediatric emergency medicine fellows: impact of primary residency training.

Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowships recruit trainees from both pediatric and emergency medicine (EM) residencies. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) defines separate training pathways for each. The 2015 PEM milestones reflect a combination of subcompetencies from the two residencies. This project aims to compare the milestone achievement of PEM fellows based on their primary residency training. We hypothesize that fellows trained in pediatrics achieve PEM milestones at different rates than EM-trained fellows in the ACGME domains of patient care, medical knowledge, systems-based practice, practice-based learning, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills. This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of fellows from a national sample of U.S. PEM fellowship programs. Basic demographic information and deidentified, biannual milestone scores for 23 competencies were collected for fellows training between 2015 and 2018. Subcompetencies are scored on a 5-point milestone scale. Descriptive and multivariable analyses for longitudinal data were performed to compare milestone assessments by primary residency training. Complete data were obtained for 600 fellows; 95% (570) and 5% (30) completed pediatric and EM residency, respectively. In both year 1 and year 2 of fellowship, the mean milestone scores of EM-trained fellows were statistically higher than pediatrics-trained fellows across the majority of subcompetencies. By the final year of training, there were no statistically significant differences in milestone scores for any of the subcompetencies. Fellow milestone achievement between groups was not significantly different by graduation. However, fellows entering PEM training from an EM background attained higher scores on the milestones than fellows from a pediatric background in the first year of fellowship.

Gender Differences Among Milestone Assessments in a National Sample of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.

Understanding gender gaps in trainee evaluations is critical because these may ultimately determine the duration of training. Currently, no studies describe the influence of gender on the evaluation of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows. The objective of our study was to compare milestone scores of female versus male PEM fellows. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of a national sample of PEM fellows from July 2014 to June 2018. Accreditation Council for Medical Education (ACGME) subcompetencies are scored on a 5-point scale and span six domains: patient care (PC), medical knowledge, systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS). Summative assessments of the 23 PEM subcompetencies are assigned by each program's clinical competency committee and submitted semiannually for each fellow. Program directors voluntarily provided deidentified ACGME milestone reports. Demographics including sex, program region, and type of residency were collected. Descriptive analysis of milestones was performed for each year of fellowship. Multivariate analyses evaluated the difference in scores by sex for each of the subcompetencies. Forty-eight geographically diverse programs participated, yielding data for 639 fellows (66% of all PEM fellows nationally); sex was recorded for 604 fellows, of whom 67% were female. When comparing the mean milestone scores in each of the six domains, there were no differences by sex in any year of training. When comparing scores within each of the 23 subcompetencies and correcting the significance level for comparison of multiple milestones, the scores for PC3 and ICS2 were significantly, albeit not meaningfully, higher for females. In a national sample of PEM fellows, we found no major differences in milestone scores between females and males.

A Community Emergency Department Rotation for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows: Development and Evaluation.

There have been increasing job opportunities for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) specialists within community emergency departments (CEDs), where 90% of children receive emergency care. The majority of training for PEM fellows occurs in academic children's hospitals, which may expose fellows to different resources than CEDs. Our goals were to develop and to evaluate a CED rotation aimed at improving exposure to this care environment for PEM fellows. Kern's 6 steps of curriculum development served as our framework to identify the problem, conduct a needs assessment, develop goals and objectives, formulate an educational strategy, and then plan the implementation and evaluation. Discussion and buy-in among trainees and hospital leadership took place during rotation development. Informal and web-based surveys of PEM fellows and CED attendings evaluated the rotation and assessed participants' reactions, changes in knowledge, and changes in behavior. The CED rotation was piloted at 1 PEM fellowship program over 2 years. Nine PEM fellows participated in the month-long rotation. The majority of participants reported that the rotation goals and objectives were met and that they acquired new skills and rated the CED rotation as good or excellent. Challenges to the CED rotation included lower patient acuity and distance to the CED. A new CED rotation was developed, piloted, and well received by participants. Given the potential differences in practice between tertiary care children's emergency departments and CEDs, as well as increasing job opportunities in CEDs, program directors should consider incorporating a CED rotation for their PEM fellows.