Pediatric Disaster Preparedness Research Articles

Pediatric disaster preparedness curriculum across emergency medicine residencies.

To assess pediatric disaster medicine (PDM) instruction in emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and to identify barriers to integrating these skills into EM training. National survey study of United States EM Residency Program Directors (PDs) and Assistant PDs during the 2021-2022 academic year. Of the 186 EM residency programs identified, a total of 24 responses were recorded with a response rate of 12.9 percent. Importance of training was rated 5.79 (standard deviation 2.51) using the Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10. Out of 24 programs, 17 (70.8 percent) do not have any PDM training as part of residency training. Live drill, simulation, and tabletop were identified as most effective methods to deliver PDM training with the Likert scale score of 4.78, 4.6, and 4.47, respectively. Senior trainees' level of -knowledge/skills with family reunification (Likert 2.09/5; chemical-biological-radiological-nuclear explosive 2.95/5) and mass casualty preparation of the emergency department (3.3/5) as assessed by the respondents. The main barrier to education included logistics, eg, space and costs (Likert 3.7/5), lack of didactic time (3.7/5), and limited faculty knowledge, skill, or experience (3.3/5). PDM training is lacking and requires standardization. This study highlights the opportunity for the creation of a model for EM resident education in PDM.

Pediatric Behavioral Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Expert Advice for Preparedness, Response, and Recovery.

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the child mental health crisis and existing disparities. Child anxiety, depression, suicide attempts and completions, and mental-health-related emergency department visits significantly increased. In response to this crisis, the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) developed behavioral health task forces associated with funded pediatric centers of disaster excellence. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funded the Pediatric Pandemic Network (PPN) to prepare for future endemics and pandemics, with behavioral health identified as a priority in mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. This commentary provides insights from pediatric disaster preparedness and response behavioral health subject matter experts. Our roles have been to identify how to build behavioral health professional competencies across disciplines and various medical settings and to strengthen emergency interdisciplinary behavioral health care capability regionally and at the national level. Specific examples of interdisciplinary training and demonstration projects are included as models for enhancing behavioral health situational awareness and developing curricula to support preparedness and response for the current ongoing pandemic and future natural and biological disasters. This commentary also includes a call to action for workforce development to move beyond a boots-on-the-ground mentality for pediatric behavioral health disaster preparedness and response toward a more inclusive role for behavioral health providers of varied specialties. This means that behavioral health providers should become more informed of federal programs in this area, seek further training, and find innovative ways to collaborate with their medical colleagues and community partners.

Pediatric Disaster Readiness and Community Hospitals in a Rural American State

Introduction:Pediatric patients represent a small (but important) subset of the patient population routinely visiting emergency departments (ED) each year. With the aim of better understanding the disaster preparedness level for pediatric-specific mass casualty and surge incidents, a survey was conducted involving all hospitals that routinely manage pediatric patients in their emergency departments, to better understand the preparedness levels for these facilities.Method:This is a retrospective analysis of data collected in 2014 and repeated in 2021. Our focus included one predominantly rural state in the United States of America (USA). We examined results from surveys conducted where facilities self-reported objective criteria that resulted in a readiness score (as it relates to pediatric readiness). Reporting stratification reflected the annual pediatric ED volume with groups of; Low (<1800/year), Medium (1800-4999 /year), Medium to High (5000-9999/year), and High (>10,000/year).Results:Low-volume hospitals scored (Mean=59/Median=56), Medium volume hospitals scored (Mean=62/Median=60), Medium to High volume hospitals (Mean=67/Median=65), and hospitals with High volumes (Mean=82/Median=83). All hospital volume ranges had outlier hospitals that scored between 82-97. The general tendency, lower volume hospitals had a lower level of readiness, and higher volume hospitals had a higher (to much higher) level of readiness.Conclusion:Pediatric disaster readiness needs to be improved at the community level. It is encouraging that pediatric disaster readiness has been addressed in the larger medical centers. Yet, it should be noted that even very low-volume hospitals (had outliers with) scores as high as 94 indicating that with ample support, and resources, pediatric disaster preparedness is achievable in every hospital regardless of size or volume. The results point to a need to develop, improve, and distribute resources and support local hospitals with pediatric disaster readiness.

Resolving the Gap: National Pediatric Disaster Coalition

Introduction:Children younger than 18 years constitute approximately 25% of the US population. During disasters, they are the most vulnerable population and have age-specific vulnerabilities that heighten their risks and magnify their unique needs. These include physiological vulnerability to pathogens, toxins, radioactive isotopes, and harsh conditions. Increased skin permeability, faster metabolism, more active cell division, higher respiratory rate, and higher surface area–to–mass ratio all contribute to greater susceptibility to physical threats. Behavioral/Developmental differences such as more hand-to-mouth contact, under-developed sense of self-preservation, more time spent outdoors, difficulty communicating symptoms and increased vulnerabilities. Children in disasters may develop mental health problems, including acute and post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression. Some children with disabilities are dependent on medical technology.Method:A US national conference in 2015 determined that significant gaps in pediatric disaster preparedness include transport, space, staffing, equipment, supplies, and training capabilities. To address these gaps the National Pediatric Disaster Coalition (NPDC) was established to advocate for enhanced pediatric disaster preparedness, and advance community healthcare preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery for infants, children, and families in disasters.Results:The NPDC consists of subject matter experts, national advisory committees, commissions, agencies, and organizations. It utilizes pediatric SME knowledge to help plan for the allocation of appropriate and essential resources to address pediatric specific needs in disasters. It serves as an information clearinghouse on pediatric disaster preparedness informed by real events, research and evolving best practice. The NPDC disseminates information through organizing and participating in conferences, and web-based training.Conclusion:Based on the special needs of children in disasters, the NPDC assessed current gaps and has established an effective advocacy and information sharing platform to match resources to pediatric needs during disasters. The NPDC can serve as a model for addressing gaps in the special needs of children and their families during disasters.

Pediatric Long-Term Care Disaster and Pandemic Planning

Introduction:Children are frequently victims of disasters. However, significant gaps remain in pediatric disaster preparedness planning. This includes a lack of planning for pediatric residents in long-term care facilities. The New York City (NYC) Pediatric Disaster Coalition (PDC) is funded by the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to improve NYC’s pediatric disaster preparedness and response. The NYC PDC partnered with experts in pediatric disaster management and the care of pediatric residents in long-term care facilities to create the Pediatric Long-Term Care Planning Committee (PLTCPC).Method:The PLTCPC included physicians, nurses, administrators, and emergency planning experts. The PLTCPC’s goal was to create guidelines and templates for use in disaster planning for pediatric residents at long-term care facilities. The committee met bi-weekly over three months and shared facility resources to create tools that meet the specific challenges presented by this population.Results:Utilizing an iterative process that included a literature review, participant presentations, review and improvement of the working documents, the final guidelines and templates for surge and evacuation of pediatric residents in long-term care facilities were created. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the NYC PDC reconvened the PLTCPC to focus on surge planning for pandemics at pediatric long-term care facilities. Two pediatric infectious disease clinicians were added to the committee. Utilizing the same process delineated above, a detailed pandemic specific annex was created based on clinical pediatric experience gained throughout the pandemic.Conclusion:To the authors' knowledge, these are the first pediatric-specific resources for long-term care disaster planning. They address the importance of matching resources to the unique needs of PLTC facilities, in regard to space, equipment, staffing, and training. Pediatric long-term care facilities present special needs during pandemics and this approach can be utilized as a model for other facilities.

The New York City Pediatric Disaster Coalition Pediatric Intensive-Care Response Team (PIRT)

Introduction:Children represent 25% of the population, have special needs, and are often over-represented in disasters. The New York City Pediatric Disaster Coalition (NYC PDC) is funded by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to improve pediatric disaster preparedness and response. PDC worked with a network of pediatric intensivists to create the Pediatric Intensive-Care Response Team (PIRT). PIRT consists of volunteer pediatric intensivists that currently practice in New York City.Method:Secondary transport may be requested by hospitals due to a mismatch of resources to needs for patients requiring critical and/or subspecialty care. The team is activated when a disaster involves a significant number of pediatric patients. In the proposed plan, the PIRT physician on-call will triage/prioritize the patients based on acuity and need for services and relay the necessary information to the transport agency. PIRT is designated to provide subject matter expertise and resources during real-world events. PIRT maintains a 24/7 on-call schedule with backup. The PIRT system was tested in four call-down communications drills and a tabletop exercise for prioritization of pediatric mass casualty victims.Results:The call-down drills demonstrated the ability to contact the on-call and backup physicians by email or text within 20 minutes and others within one hour. In the tabletop, PIRT members were given 15 patient profiles based on a scenario and asked to prioritize patients based on their injuries/medical needs. This was accomplished in less than 30 minutes, followed by a review and discussion of the rank order. A number of lessons learned were identified and will be presented.Conclusion:The NYCPDC has developed and tested a PIRT that is available 24/7 to prioritize patients for secondary transport and offer subject matter expertise during pediatric mass casualty events. This model can be utilized to enhance pediatric disaster preparedness.

Lessons Learned from 28 Hospitals and City Agencies: Pediatric Disaster Exercise

Introduction:Children are frequently victims of disasters. However, gaps remain in pediatric disaster preparedness. The New York City Pediatric Disaster Coalition (NYCPDC) is funded by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to prepare NYC for mass casualty events that involve large numbers of children. The NYC PDC conducted a functional exercise testing surge, communications, and secondary transport. Participants included 28 NYC hospitals, the NYC Fire Department-Emergency Medical Services (FDNY-EMS), NYC Emergency Management (NYCEM), NYC DOHMH and the NYC Medical Reserve Corps (MRC).Method:The hospitals and agencies participated in group and individual planning meetings. Scenario-driven, operations-based activities challenged participants to employ their facility's existing pediatric surge and secondary transport plans during an event. The exercise assessed: Communications, Emergency Operation Plans, Surge, Patient Tracking, Patient Transfer, Supplies, and Staffing. Internal and external evaluators assessed the exercise performance.Results:An After-Action Report was written based on information from evaluation data, site-specific and group hot-washes, and an after-action conference. Strengths included meaningful improvement of plans before/after the exercise and doubling pediatric critical care capacity through the implementation of the exercise objectives. Challenges included: gaps in communication/patient tracking, lack of sufficient sub-specialty support, the need for "babysitters” and inadequate supplies of blood products and ventilators.Conclusion:Conducting a multi-hospital and agency pediatric specific exercise demonstrated current planning and produced lessons learned to address planning and training gaps that can improve citywide planning and capabilities during future full-scale exercise and real-time events.

Pediatric Outpatient, Urgent-care Emergency and Disaster Planning

Introduction:Children are frequently victims of disasters; however important gaps remain in pediatric disaster planning. This includes a lack of resources for pediatric preparedness planning for patients in outpatient/urgent-care facilities. The New York City Pediatric Disaster Coalition (NYCPDC) is funded by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to improve NYC’s pediatric disaster preparedness and response.After creating planning resources in Pediatric Long-Term Care Facilities, Hospital Pediatric Departments, Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units, and Obstetric/Newborn Services within NYC hospitals, the NYCPDC partnered with leaders and experts from outpatient/urgent-care facilities caring for pediatric patients and created the Pediatric Outpatient Disaster Planning Committee (PODPC). PODPC’s goal was to create guidelines and templates for use in disaster planning for pediatric patients at outpatient/urgent-care facilities.Method:The PODPC includes physicians, nurses, administrators and emergency planning experts who have experience working with outpatient facilities. There were 21 committee members from eight organizations (the NYCPDC, DOHMH, Community Healthcare Association of NY State, NY State DOH, NYC Health and Hospitals, Maimonides Medical Center and Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center). The committee met six times over a four-month period and shared information to create disaster planning tools that meet the specific pediatric challenges in the outpatient setting.Results:Utilizing an iterative process including literature review, participant presentations, discussions review and improvement of working documents, the final guidelines and templates for surge and evacuation of pediatric patients in outpatient/urgent care facilities were created in 2018. Subsequently model plans were completed and implemented at five NYC Outpatient/Urgent-care facilities.Conclusion:An expert committee utilizing an iterative process successfully created disaster guidelines and templates for pediatric outpatient/urgent care facilities. They addressed the importance of matching the special needs of children to available space, staff and equipment needs and created model plans for site-specific use.

Addressing Health-Care Disparities in Pediatric Disaster Planning: A Qualitative Study.

The Western Regional Alliance for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (WRAP-EM) is a multi-state, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) funded pediatric disaster center of excellence. WRAP-EM set out to determine the impact of health disparities on its 11 core areas. We conducted 11 focus groups during April 2021. Discussions were led by an experienced facilitator, and participants could also include their thoughts on a Padlet throughout the discussion. Data were analyzed to determine overarching themes. Responses focused on health literacy, health disparities, resource opportunities, addressing obstacles, and resilience building. Health literacy data highlighted the need for development of readiness and preparedness plans, community engagement in cultural and language appropriate means, and increasing diversity in training. Obstacles faced included funding; inequitable distribution of research, resources, and supplies; lack of prioritization of pediatric needs; and fear of retribution from the system. Multiple already existing resources and programs were referenced highlighting the importance of best practice sharing and networking. A stronger commitment to mental health-care delivery, empowerment of individuals and communities, use of telemedicine, and ongoing cultural and diverse education were recurring themes. Results of the focus groups can be used to prioritize efforts to address and improve health disparities in pediatric disaster preparedness.

Promoting disaster preparedness for children with special healthcare needs: A scoping review

The rise in the global temperature from greenhouse gases linked to human activities have influenced the increase in frequency of natural disasters, including hurricanes, tropical cyclones, floods, wildfires, and droughts. Children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN) are particularly susceptible to extreme weather events. Disaster planning for CSHCN is an important public health issue. The aim of this study is to contribute to the limited body of literature related to the climate crisis and CSHCN, and to summarize possible ways to improve the disaster preparedness of families of CSHCN. Using OVID Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute, a scoping review of studies from 2011 to 2021 related to climate change and disability was conducted. After screening, 242 articles were captured and eight articles on pediatric disaster preparedness for CSHCN were analyzed. Several studies assessing emergency preparedness knowledge of families with CSHCN demonstrated that the majority do not have a disaster kit, emergency plan, information cards, or awareness of a shelter. One study showed no difference in preparedness of families with CSHCN in two geographic regions prone to different natural disasters. Two studies evaluated families with CSHCN dependent on electricity for survival and less than 50% had battery backups for prolonged power failure. Families of CSHCN are generally underprepared for a natural disaster, regardless of the type of disaster. Based on the included studies, the following improved the level of preparedness of families with CSHCN: disaster preparedness education, an emergency kit, an eight-item checklist provided in the emergency room, a clinic nurse coordinator, as well as programs and policies that improved social support, self-efficacy, and resilience.

Simulating a Vertical Evacuation of a NICU and PICU to Examine the Relationship Between Training and Preparedness.

The aim of this study was to implement pediatric vertical evacuation disaster training and evaluate its effectiveness by using a full-scale exercise to compare outcomes in trained and untrained participants. Various clinical and nonclinical staff in a tertiary care university hospital received pediatric vertical evacuation training sessions over a 6-wk period. The training consisted of disaster and evacuation didactics, hands-on training in use of evacuation equipment, and implementation of an evacuation toolkit. An unannounced full-scale simulated vertical evacuation of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Drill participants completed a validated evaluation tool. Pearson chi-squared testing was used to analyze the data. Eighty-four evaluations were received from drill participants. Forty-three (51%) of the drill participants received training and 41 (49%) did not. Staff who received pediatric evacuation training were more likely to feel prepared compared with staff who did not (odds ratio, 4.05; confidence interval: 1.05-15.62). There was a statistically significant increase in perceived preparedness among those who received training. Recently trained pediatric practitioners were able to achieve exercise objectives on par with the regularly trained emergency department staff. Pediatric disaster preparedness training may mitigate the risks associated with caring for children during disasters.

Pediatric Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Visits in Houston after Hurricane Harvey.

IntroductionNatural disasters are increasingly common and devastating. It is essential to understand children’s health needs during disasters as they are a particularly vulnerable population. The objective of this study was to evaluate pediatric disease burden after Hurricane Harvey compared to the preceding month and the same period in the previous year to inform pediatric disaster preparedness.MethodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients seen at pediatric emergency departments (ED) and urgent care centers (UCC) 30 days before (late summer) and after (early fall) the hurricane and from the same time period in 2016. We collected demographic information and the first five discharge diagnoses from a network of EDs and UCCs affiliated with a quaternary care children’s hospital in Houston, Texas. We calculated the odds of disease outcomes during various timeframes using binary logistic regression modeling.ResultsThere were 20,571 (median age: 3.5 years, 48.1% female) and 18,943 (median age: 3.5 years, 47.3% female) patients in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Inpatient admission rates from the ED a month after Harvey were 20.5%, compared to 25.3% in the same period in 2016 (P<0.001). In both years, asthma and other respiratory illnesses increased from late summer to early fall. After controlling for these seasonal trends, the following diseases were more commonly seen after the hurricane: toxicological emergencies (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.61, 95% [confidence interval] CI, 1.35–5.05); trauma (aOR: 1.42, 95% CI, 1.32–1.53); and dermatological complaints (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI, 1.23–1.46).ConclusionWe observed increases in rashes, trauma, and toxicological diagnoses in children after a major flood. These findings highlight the need for more medication resources and public health and education measures focused on pediatric disaster preparedness and management.

Pediatric disaster preparedness: identifying challenges and opportunities for emergency department planning.

To review the current literature on best practices for pediatric disaster preparedness in an emergency department (ED). Children have unique anatomical, physiologic, immunologic, and psychosocial needs that impact their vulnerability to and resilience in a disaster, yet they have been historically underrepresented in disaster planning at local and national levels. Lessons learned from recent disaster events, disaster research, and disaster experts provide guidance on pediatric disaster preparedness for ED. All EDs should include children in their disaster plans and exercises. ED staff should be knowledgeable about their role in institutional disaster operations and familiar with standard disaster management principles.

The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist - An Innovative Approach to Improving Pediatric Disaster Planning and Preparedness in Chicago

Introduction:The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Facility Recognition Program was implemented in 1998. The objective was to identify the capability of a hospital to provide optimal pediatric emergency and critical care. Beginning in 2004, steps were taken to integrate pediatric disaster preparedness into the facility recognition process.Aim:The goal of this study was to identify strengths and areas for improvement in pediatric disaster preparedness in participating Chicago hospitals.Methods:The impact of the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist was assessed during the 2016 Pediatric Facility Recognition hospital site surveys. The following components were surveyed as they relate to pediatrics: Overall Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), Surge Capacity, Decontamination, Reunification/Patient Tracking, Security, Evacuation, Mass Casualty Triage/JumpSTART, Children with Special Health Care Needs/Children with Functional Access Needs, Pharmaceutical Preparedness, Recovery, Exercise/Drills/Trainings. All survey items were extracted, collated, and reviewed.Results:Fourteen Chicago hospitals participated in the survey. Almost all hospitals (93%) surveyed indicated that they consult staff with pediatric expertise when updating their EOP, incorporate pediatric trained mental health professionals into their disaster call lists (93%), and integrate staff with pediatric focus into their incident command system/emergency operation center during a disaster (79%). Almost all of the hospitals (93%) had an infant/child abduction plan and all hospitals (100%) were testing the process at least once per year. Finally, almost all of the hospitals (93%) had incorporated a patient connection program into their tracking and reunification plan. However, not all hospitals included drills for pediatric surge, decontamination, and evacuation. Less than one-third of the hospitals had pediatric components in their alternate treatment site plans. Half of the hospitals did not have pediatric components incorporated into their decontamination plans.Discussion:Integrating the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist surveys into the recognition process is an innovative approach to improve pediatric disaster planning and preparedness in hospitals.

The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist Does Impact Pediatric Disaster Planning and Preparedness in Chicago: A Comparison of 2012 and 2016 EMSC Facility Recognition Surveys

Introduction:The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Facility Recognition Program was implemented in 1998. The objective was to identify the capability of a hospital to provide optimal pediatric emergency and critical care. Beginning in 2004, steps were taken to integrate pediatric disaster preparedness into the facility recognition process.Aim:The goal of this study was to identify the impact of the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist across time in Chicago hospitals undergoing Pediatric Facility Recognition.Methods:Chicago hospitals were evaluated during the 2012 and 2016 Pediatric Facility Recognition Program. The following components were surveyed as they relate to pediatrics: Overall Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), Surge Capacity, Decontamination, Reunification/Patient Tracking, Security, Evacuation, Mass Casualty Triage/JumpSTART, Children with Special Health Care Needs/Children with Functional Access Needs, Pharmaceutical Preparedness, Recovery, Exercise/Drills/Trainings. Data from 2012 and 2014 checklist categories were compared and p-values were computed utilizing Fisher’s Exact Test. A p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Stockpiling of staging areas or having ready access to resuscitation supplies increased 46% (p &lt; 0.05), testing of pediatric surge capacity in previous 24 months decreased 43% (p &lt; 0.05), maintaining warmed water source for decontamination decreased 43% (p &lt; 0.05), and having familiarity of evacuation procedures in ED, pediatric, and nursery personnel decreased 42% (p &lt; 0.05). Although not statistically significant, the training of pediatric staff with JumpSTART triage increased 59%, EOP containing a pediatric reunification process increased by 36%, the presence of specific staff plans to allow care of dependents increased for children (29%), elderly (32%) and pets (35%), integration of a pediatric component into hospital EOP increased by 29%, and identification of an alternate treatment site for children decreased by 25%.Discussion:Integrating the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist surveys into the facility recognition process impacts pediatric disaster preparedness and planning, and identifies areas of improvement in hospitals.

Pediatric Outpatient/Urgent-Care Emergency and Disaster Planning

Introduction:Children are frequently victims of disasters, however important gaps remain in pediatric disaster planning. This includes a lack of resources for pediatric preparedness planning for patients in outpatient/urgent-care facilities. The New York City Pediatric Disaster Coalition (NYCPDC) is funded by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to improve NYC’s pediatric disaster preparedness and response.Aim:After creating planning resources in Pediatric Long-Term Care Facilities, Hospital Pediatric Departments, Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units and Obstetric/Newborn Services within NYC hospitals, the NYCPDC partnered with leaders and experts from outpatient/urgent-care facilities caring for pediatric patients and created the Pediatric Outpatient Disaster Planning Committee (PODPC). PODPC’s goal was to create guidelines and templates for use in disaster planning for pediatric patients at outpatient/urgent-care facilities.Methods:The PODPC includes physicians, nurses, administrators, and emergency planning experts who have experience working with outpatient facilities. There were 21 committee members from eight organizations (the NYCPDC, DOHMH, Community Healthcare Association of NY State, NY State DOH, NYC Health and Hospitals, Maimonides Medical Center and Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center). The committee met six times over a four-month period and shared information to create disaster planning tools that meet the specific pediatric challenges in the outpatient setting.Results:Utilizing an iterative process including literature review, participant presentations, discussions review, and improvement of working documents, the final guidelines and templates for surge and evacuation of pediatric patients in outpatient/urgent care facilities were created in February 2018. Subsequently, model plans were completed and implemented at five NYC outpatient/urgent-care facilities.Discussion:An expert committee utilizing an iterative process successfully created disaster guidelines and templates for pediatric outpatient/urgent care facilities. They addressed the importance of matching the special needs of children to available space, staff, and equipment needs and created model plans for site-specific use.

A tabletop school bus rollover: Connecticut-wide drills to build pediatric disaster preparedness and promote a novel hospital disaster readiness checklist.

To assess emergency medical services (EMS) and hospital disaster plans and communication and promote an integrated pediatric disaster response in the state of Connecticut, using tabletop exercises to promote education, collaboration, and planning among healthcare entities. Using hospital-specific and national guidelines, a disaster preparedness plan consisting of pediatric guidelines and a hospital checklist was created by The Connecticut Coalition for Pediatric Disaster Preparedness. Five school bus rollover tabletop exercises were conducted, one in each of Connecticut's five EMS regions. Action figures and playsets were used to depict patients, healthcare workers, vehicles, the school, and the hospital. EMS personnel, nurses, physicians and hospital administrators. Participants had a facilitated debriefing of the EMS and prehospital response to disasters, communication among prehospital organizations, public health officials, hospitals, and schools, and surge capacity, capability, and alternate care sites. A checklist was completed for each exercise and was used with the facilitated debriefing to generate an afteraction report. Additionally, each participant completed a postexercise survey. Each after-action report and postexercise survey was compared to established guidelines to address gaps in hospital specific pediatric readiness. Exercises occurred at five hospitals, with inpatient capacity ranging 77-1,592 beds, and between 0 and 221 pediatric beds. There were 27 participants in the tabletop exercises, and 20 complete survey responses for analysis (74 percent). After the exercises, pediatric disaster preparedness aligned with coalition guidelines. However, methods of expanding surge capacity and methods of generating surge capacity and capability varied (p < 0.031). Statewide tabletop exercises promoted coalition building and revealed gaps between actual and ideal practice. Generation of surge capacity and capability should be addressed in future disaster education.

The Importance of Family Reunification in Pediatric Disaster Planning

In the aftermath of a disaster, families may become separated. With greater than 60 million children being apart from their families during the day, one could imagine a disaster resulting in great difficulties in reuniting these children with their families. History has shown us that widespread events can prove particularly challenging as was shown during Hurricane Katrina when it took up to 6 months to reunite all displaced children with their families. This article will discuss the history of pediatric disaster preparedness efforts, highlighting some of the available resources in the development of a family reunification plan. Next will be a discussion of basic features of a well-thought-out family reunification plan, including critical areas to establish as part of an institution's plan. Key partners necessary to engage will be discussed, as well as the importance of testing any plan through drills. Finally, future work will be highlighted.

Pediatric Online Disaster Preparedness Training for Medical and Non-Medical Personnel: A Multi-Level Modeling Analysis.

A multi-disciplinary team within the Pediatric Disaster Resource and Training Center at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (Los Angeles, California USA) developed an online training course. Available archival course data from July 2009 to August 2012 were analyzed through linear growth curve multi-level modeling, with module total score as the outcome (0 to 100 points), attempt as the Level 1 variable (any module could be repeated), role in the hospital (medical or non-medical) as the Level 2 variable, and attempt by role as the cross-level effect. A total of 44,115 module attempts by 5,773 course participants (3,686 medical personnel and 2,087 non-medical personnel) were analyzed. The average module total score upon first attempt across all participants ranged from 60.28 to 80.11 points, and participants significantly varied in how they initially scored. On average in the planning, triage, and age-specific care modules: total scores significantly increased per attempt across all participants (average rate of change ranged from 0.59 to 1.84 points) and medical personnel had higher total scores initially and through additional attempts (average difference ranged from 13.25 to 16.24 points). Cross-level effects were significant in the disaster management and hospital emergency code response modules: on average, total scores were initially lower among non-medical personnel compared to medical personnel, but non-medical personnel increased their total scores per attempt by 3.77 points in the disaster management module and 6.40 points in the hospital emergency code response module, while medical personnel did not improve their total scores through additional attempts. Medical and non-medical hospital personnel alike can acquire knowledge of pediatric disaster preparedness. Key content can be reinforced or improved through successive training in an online course. PhamPK, BeharSM, BergBM, UppermanJS, NagerAL. Pediatric online disaster preparedness training for medical and non-medical personnel: a multi-level modeling analysis Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(4):349-354.

National survey of institutional pediatric disaster preparedness.

Describe institutional disaster preparations focusing upon the strategies to address pediatric patients in disaster preparedness. Descriptive study using survey methodology. Hospitals that provide emergency care to pediatric patients throughout the United States. Survey responses were solicited from hospital personnel that are familiar with the disaster preparedness plan at their institution. None. Describe how pediatric patients are included in institutional disaster preparedness plans. The presence of a pediatric-specific lead, policies and procedures, and geographic/demographic patterns are also a focus. The survey was distributed to 120 hospitals throughout the United States and responses were received from 29 states. Overall response rate was 58 percent, with 53 percent of the surveys fully completed. Sixty-three percent of hospitals had an individual responsible for pediatric-specific disaster planning and 78 percent specifically addressed the care of pediatric patients (<16 yo) in their disaster plan. The hospitals with an individual designated for pediatric disaster planning were more likely to have a disaster plan that specifically addresses the care of pediatric patients (90 percent vs 56 percent; p = 0.015), to represent children with special healthcare needs as simulated patients in disaster exercises (73 percent vs 22 percent; p = 0.003), and to include pediatric decontamination procedures in disaster exercises (78 percent vs 35 percent; p = 0.008) than hospitals without a designated pediatric disaster planner. The majority of hospitals surveyed incorporate pediatric patients into their disaster preparedness plan. Those hospitals with an individual designated for pediatric disaster planning were more likely to specifically address the care of pediatric patients in their institutional disaster plan.