Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale Research Articles

Effect of Remimazolam on Emergence Delirium in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial.

Preventing emergence delirium is a clinical goal for pediatric anesthesia, yet there is no consensus on its prevention. This study investigated the hypothesis that a continuous infusion or a single bolus of remimazolam can reduce the incidence of emergence delirium in children. A hundred and twenty children aged 1-6 years old were randomly and equally allocated into three groups: group RC, which received a continuous infusion of remimazolam at 1 mg kg -1 h -1; group RB, which received a single bolus of remimazolam at 0.2 mg kg -1 at the beginning of wound closure; and group C, which received a continuous infusion of saline at 1 mL kg -1 h -1 and single bolus of saline at 0.2 mL kg -1 at the beginning of sutures. The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence delirium assessed by pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scale. Secondary outcomes included the number of rescues propofol administrations in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), recovery time, end-tidal sevoflurane concentration when maintaining BIS within the range of 40-60, and adverse events. The incidence of emergence delirium in group RC (5%, vs. group C, risk ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.59; P=0.001) and group RB (7.7%, vs. group C, risk ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.71; P=0.003) was significantly lower compared with group C (32.5%). Propofol was given to 2 patients in each of groups RC and RB to treat delirium and to 10 patients in group C (group RC vs. group C, risk ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.86; P=0.012; group RB vs. group C, risk ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.88; P=0.014). No differences in the recovery time and adverse effects were detected. Both continuous infusion and single bolus administration of remimazolam can effectively reduce the occurrence of emergence delirium in children.

The effect on perioperative anxiety and emergence delirium of the child or parent's preference for parental accompaniment during anesthesia induction in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery.

Pediatric emergence delirium (ED) occurs in the early postoperative period and is defined as a complex psychiatric disorder. Non-pharmacological methods of treatment, such as perioperative parental presence, have been the focus of many studies, but the impact on preventing ED of which parent accompanies the child during anesthesia induction has not been identified as yet. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether the selection made by children undergoing adenotonsillectomy of which parent will accompany them during anesthesia induction has the effect of reducing postoperative delirium scores and incidence compared to selections made by the parents. The study included 80 children of both genders, aged 5-12 years, who underwent day-case surgery in the otorhinolaryngology clinic. The patients were separated randomly into two groups of 40. In Group 1, the children were asked to choose which of their parents would accompany them during general anesthesia induction, and in Group 2, the parents were asked to decide who would be the accompanying parent. Evaluation of postoperative delirium was made using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. The anxiety level of the children was evaluated with the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) both in the preoperative waiting area and during the anesthesia induction. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used to evaluate the anxiety level of the parents. The mean PAED scores were similar in both groups (mean difference [95% CI]: -0.1 [-2.8 to 0.7]). The incidence of emergence delirium was also similar in both groups (risk ratio 0.9 [0.4 to 1.8]). The mean mYPAS scores during the induction of anesthesia of Group 1 was lower than that of Group 2 (mean difference [95% CI]: -8.4 [-15.2 to -1.6]). The mean mYPAS scores evaluated in the preoperative waiting area were found to be similar in the two groups (mean difference [95% CI]: -1.9 [-7.5 to 3.5]). The mean STAI anxiety scores of the parents were similar in both groups, with higher scores obtained by mothers compared to fathers, at all measurement times. The incidence or severity of ED did not decrease significantly even though lower anxiety scores were obtained during anesthesia induction in children who were allowed to make the decision of accompanying parent. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that postoperative delirium is a more complicated process that can be affected by many other variables rather than just the parent-child general interaction.

Comparison of bolus dose administration of propofol and dexmedetomidine for incidence of emergence delirium in pediatric patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia: A randomized, double-blind trial

Abstract Background and Aims: Emergence delirium (ED) during the postanesthesia recovery phase presents significant challenges, especially among pediatric patients, with incidence rates spanning from 2% to 80%. This study sought to assess and compare the effectiveness of propofol and dexmedetomidine in addressing ED in pediatric patients undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia. The primary aim was to ascertain the prevalence of ED in both treatment cohorts, while secondary outcomes encompassed postoperative pain, hemodynamic responses, and the occurrence of complications. Material and Methods: Eighty children aged 2–6 years scheduled for short infraumbilical surgeries under general anesthesia were recruited in this trial. Propofol (1 mg/kg) or dexmedetomidine (0.3 μg/kg) was administered 10 min before completion of surgery. The Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium scale was employed to evaluate ED every 5 min following extubation, wherein a score exceeding 12 was indicative of ED. Postoperative sedation was assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale, while pain levels were determined through the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score. Any potential complications were closely monitored. Results: The incidence of ED at extubation was 2.50% and 70% in group D and P, respectively, and the trend of lower ED incidence was consistently observed at 5, 10, 15, and 30 min postextubation. The relative risk ratio at extubation was 4.103 (95% confidence interval: 2.49–6.76), highlighting a significant reduction of 4.1 times in the risk of ED when dexmedetomidine was administered. The dexmedetomidine group exhibited a lower incidence of postoperative pain. Conclusion: In comparison to propofol, dexmedetomidine demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing ED and postoperative pain in pediatric patients during general anesthesia, when administered before completion of surgery.

The Median Effective Dose of Dexmedetomidine for the Inhibition of Emergence Delirium in Preschool Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy and/or Adenoidectomy: A Retrospective Dose-response Trial.

The incidence of emergence delirium (ED) is higher in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the median effective dose (ED50) of dexmedetomidine (DEX) for the inhibition of ED in preschool children by using probit regression analysis. A total of 140 anesthesia records were retrieved and divided into seven groups based on the infusion rate of DEX: .2, .25, .3, .35, .4, .45, and .5μg·kg-1·h-1. The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS) was used to assess ED in preschool children, and ED was defined as a PAEDS score ≥ 10. Probit regression analysis revealed that the ED50 and ED95 of DEX were .31μg·kg-1·h-1 (95% CI: .29-.35) and .48μg·kg-1·h-1 (95% CI: .44-.56), respectively. Probit(p) = -2.84 + 9.28 × ln (Dose), (χ2 = 1.925, P = .859). The PAEDS score was significantly increased in the ED group, and the rate of bradycardia was significantly decreased in the ED group compared with the without ED group (27.3% vs 54.1%, P = .02). DEX can effectively inhibit the ED in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, however, bradycardia was the main complication.

Methadone for Emergence Delirium in Ambulatory Pediatric Strabismus Surgery.

Background: Emergence delirium in children following strabismus surgery is a distressing and potentially dangerous condition and is likely attributable to visual disturbances, pain, and anesthetic gases. We explored whether a single intraoperative dose of methadone could reduce emergence delirium. Methods: Our study was an institutional review board-approved prospective, controlled, before-and-after investigation. Inclusion criteria were age <18 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1 or 2. Patients were excluded for obesity, documented sleep apnea, significant neurologic disease, or inpatient status. Control group patients were recruited sequentially, and the anesthetic was performed per preference. The study group was recruited similarly and received an intravenous dose of methadone 0.15 mg/kg at induction. The primary outcome was peak score on the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. Secondary outcomes included time to anesthetic emergence, postoperative pain scores, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, and postdischarge respiratory complications. Results: Forty-nine control group and 55 study group patients were recruited. No significant differences were found between groups for age, sex, weight, ASA classification, or duration of surgery. The control group received more preoperative midazolam, intraoperative fentanyl, and intraoperative ketorolac. Compared to the control group, the study group had 42% and 85% reductions in peak and severe PAED scale scores, respectively, in the PACU and required less rescue pain medications. Anesthetic emergence time and length of stay were not different between the groups. No significant postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion: Emergence delirium following outpatient pediatric strabismus surgery was substantially mitigated by the use of intraoperative methadone without affecting PACU throughput. No significant complications occurred. Further study is warranted to corroborate routine use of this drug for emergence delirium.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol on Sevoflurane related Emergence Agitation in Paediatric Patients: A Randomised Clinical Study

Introduction: Postoperative Emergence Agitation (EA) is a troublesome side-effect of sevoflurane anaesthesia. Drugs like dexmedetomidine and propofol offer significant benefits in reducing the incidence and severity of sevoflurane-related postoperative EA in paediatric patients. Aim: To compare the efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine and propofol in reducing the incidence and severity of EA associated with sevoflurane anaesthesia in paediatric patients. Materials and Methods: A randomised clinical study was conducted on 140 patients, belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) classes I and II, aged between 2-6 years, undergoing infraumbilical surgery lasting more than one hour. The patients were divided into two equal groups receiving dexmedetomidine 0.3 μg/kg (Group SD) and propofol 1 mg/kg (Group SP) at the start of skin closure, administered over 10 minutes. The incidence of EA in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) was evaluated using the Watcha scale, and the severity of EA was assessed using the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. A Watcha score of 3 or 4 indicated the presence of EA, while a PAED score of ≥12 was deemed significant. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0, with an Independent sample t-test for comparing normally distributed quantitative parameters, and the Chi-square test for comparing categorical outcomes between the study groups. Results: The mean age of the patients in group SD was 4.19±0.78 years, and in group SP was 4.03±0.71 years. Both study groups were found to be comparable in terms of patient characteristics such as age, sex, weight, and duration of surgery (p-value &gt;0.05). The incidence of postoperative EA, as measured by the Watcha scale, was higher in group SP compared to group SD upon arrival and up to 30 minutes in the PACU (p-value &lt;0.001). The severity of EA, assessed using the PAED score, was greater in group SP compared to group SD at 0, 5, 10,15 and 20 minutes in the PACU (p-value &lt;0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 0.3 μg/kg was more effective than propofol 1 mg/kg in reducing the incidence and severity of EA associated with sevoflurane anaesthesia, with minimal haemodynamic effects and no clinically relevant severe adverse effects in both the groups. The significantly prolonged extubation times observed in the propofol group did not result in significantly longer stays in the PACU.

Comparison of the Agitation-Reducing Effects of Esmolol and Lidocaine in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Study

Objective: Agitation is a common symptom in children undergoing surgery, especially when surgeries are performed under sevoflurane and when patients undergo strabismus surgery. Because agitation can increase the risk of falls and lacerations on surgical sites and can delay discharge from the recovery room, adopting measures to reduce the incidence of agitation is essential. This study aimed to compare the agitation-reducing effects of lidocaine and esmolol administered individually or as a combination.Methods: We included 80 patients scheduled to undergo strabismus surgery. Thiopental and sevoflurane were administered to induce general anesthesia. Group EL received lidocaine (2 mg/kg) right after the end of surgery and esmolol (0.5 mg/kg) immediately after recovery from anesthesia after turning the anesthetic gas off; group L received lidocaine at 2 mg/kg right after the end of surgery and did not receive esmolol, group E did not receive lidocaine at the end of the surgery but received esmolol at 0.5 mg/kg right after recovery from anesthesia, and group C received neither esmolol nor lidocaine. Agitation severity was assessed using the objective pain score, Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale immediately after recovery from anesthesia and until discharge from the recovery room.Results: Groups L and EL showed significantly lower agitation than groups E and C right after recovery from anesthesia, right after arrival to the recovery room, and 10 minutes after arrival to the recovery room (P &lt; 0.05). Groups L and EL showed no differences in the reduction of the severity of agitation (P &gt; 0.05).Conclusion: Compared to the groups without lidocaine administration, groups L and EL, which received 2 mg/kg lidocaine, showed a higher level of reduction in agitation immediately after recovery from anesthesia and right after arrival to the recovery room (P &lt; 0.05).

Factores asociados con el delirio de emergencia en pacientes pediátricos en Perú: resultados de un estudio transversal

Objectives: Identify associated factors with emergence delirium in children in the Post-Anesthetic Recovery Unit of a Pediatric Health Specialized Institute in Peru. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in children from 2 to 6 years old, physical status classification I and II, in elective procedures under anesthesia. The main variable was the presence of emergence delirium evaluated with the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale greater than or equal to 10 points. To identify the factors associated with delirium, the Poisson regression model was applied and a p value &lt; 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of the 150 children, it was found that the incidence of emergence delirium occurred in 10.6%. Of these, 81.4% were under 5 years of age, pain was significantly associated in 37.5% with PR = 3.63, 95%CI [1.20, 10.1] and it was observed that 68, 8% required palliative care. Conclusions: Pain was associated with delirium of postanesthetic emergence in children. Prevention and treatment of emergence delirium should focus on postoperative pain control and careful monitoring of patients after surgery.

Parental Presence during Induction of Anesthesia and Emergence Delirium Influence the Incidence of Postoperative Maladaptive Behavioral Changes.

Surgical intervention in pediatric patients can cause variable degrees of psychological stress with potential consequences in the perioperative period and even in the long term, after hospital discharge in the form of behavioral changes days and months later. The aim of our study was to determine which preoperative preparation strategy reduces postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes in children undergoing ambulatory pediatric surgery. This prospective observational study included 638 pediatric American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II patients who underwent ambulatory pediatric surgery. They were grouped into four preoperative preparation groups: not premedicated (NADA), premedicated with midazolam (MDZ), parental presence during induction of anesthesia (PPIA), and parental presence during induction of anesthesia and premedicated with midazolam (PPIA + MDZ). All patients included in the study were contacted by telephone during 1 year posthospital discharge to assess the postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes using the Posthospitalization Behavior Questionnaire (PHBQ). We performed a multivariate analysis to evaluate the influence of type of preparation and behavioral changes. Patients in the PPIA and PPIA + MDZ preparation groups presented less postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes compared to patients in the NADA and MDZ groups (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8 [1.1-2.8] and OR 2.2 [1.03-4.49]) during the first week and first month. The intensity of emergence delirium measured by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale increases the probability of postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes (OR: 1.05 [1.006-1.103]). The presence of parents during induction of anesthesia (PPIA and PPIA + MDZ) is a very effective strategy in reducing postoperative behavioral changes. These benefits are more significant in children under 5 years of age.

Effect of caudal nalbuphine on postoperative emergence agitation in pediatrics undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries: Randomized double-blind study

ABSTRACT Background Postoperative agitation is characterized by increased recovery time, irritability, and disorientation. This study hypothesized that adding nalbuphine to caudal bupivacaine could improve postoperative emergence agitation (EA). Methods Eighty children (2-12 years and ASA I-II) undergoing sub-umbilical abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group-B received caudal bupivacaine 0.125 of 1 ml/kg plus 2 ml normal saline, whereas Group-N received caudal bupivacaine 0.125 of 1 ml/kg plus 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine diluted in 2ml normal saline. We evaluated postoperative EA according to the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale (PAED) on admission to the PACU and every 30 minutes for two hours postoperatively. Postoperative pain, sedation, rescue analgesia complications, and parents’ satisfaction were also recorded. Results No statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the postoperative PAED scale at different times (p > 0.05), but inside each group, there was a significant decrease PAED scale at different times of assessment (p < 0.001) as compared to baseline data. Group-N had significantly better results concerning postoperative sedation and analgesia. No significant differences between study groups as regardingthe hemodynamic parameters. Group-N had a significantly prolonged time to 1st analgesic request, lower total rescue analgesia consumption, and more parents’ satisfaction scores. No serious adverse effects were recorded during the study. Conclusion Adding nalbuphine to bupivacaine during pediatric caudal block had no significantly different effects on postoperative EA (PAED score). Both drugs decreased the incidence of EA with less severity in the nalbuphine group. Nalbuphine also decreases postoperative pain with more sedation.

Incidence and risk factors for emergence delirium in children undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia - A prospective, observational study.

Emergence delirium (ED) is a common complication after general anaesthesia (GA) in children, with an incidence of 2%-80%. This study evaluated the incidence and risk factors for ED in children undergoing surgery under GA. This observational, prospective study was conducted in 336 children of either gender aged 2-13 years scheduled for surgeries under GA. Preoperative anxiety and demographics were noted. Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, Watcha scale, and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale were monitored 30 min postsurgery. A PAED score ≥12 and a Watcha scale score ≥3 were taken as ED. The primary outcome was the incidence of ED. An adjusted multivariate linear regression model explored the association with ED. The incidence of ED was 3.87% (n = 13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80, 5.94). ED was significantly associated with male sex (β coefficient 0.06, 95% CI: 0.003, 0.11) and severe preoperative anxiety (β coefficient 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.12) in a multivariate linear regression model adjusted for other confounders. When pain scores were added to the regression model, ED was significantly associated only with pain at 0 and 10 min after surgery (P values 0.005 and 0.002, respectively). Both PAED (AUROC 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.00) and Watcha (AUROC 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.00) scores showed an excellent ability to detect ED. The incidence of ED was 3.87% (95% CI: 1.80, 5.94) and was significantly associated with male sex, severe preoperative anxiety and pain.

Individual cartoon video for alleviating perioperative anxiety and reducing emergence delirium in children: a prospective randomised trial

BackgroundPerioperative anxiety and emergence delirium (ED) in young children may cause a series of adverse events, which are worth investigating. Pharmacological treatments of anxiety and delirium remain uncertain, while non-pharmacological...

Efficacy and safety comparison of esketamine-propofol with nalbuphine-propofol for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Anesthetics such as propofol, esketamine and nalbuphine are used during the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to achieve and maintain the desired sedation level. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of propofol-nalbuphine and propofol-esketamine in children. A multi-centered study was performed at three tertiary class-A hospitals. Children between 3 and 12 years old undergoing diagnostic painless upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included and randomly divided into esketamine or nalbuphine group to estimate the primary outcome of successful endoscope insertion. The patients were given esketamine 0.5 mg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg intravenously in esketamine group, with nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg in the nalbuphine group. The primary outcome was success rate for the first attempt of endoscope insertion in each group. Secondary outcomes included the safety of both anesthesia regimens and gastroenterologist's satisfaction. We used the Face, Leg, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale to evaluate the level of pain before and during the procedure and the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale to assess the level of agitation and delirium after awakening from anesthesia. Among 246 patients, 200 were randomly included in the final intention-to-treat analysis, with 100 patients in each group. The success rate for the first attempt of endoscope insertion in the esketamine group was higher than the nalbuphine group (97% vs. 66%; P < 0.01). The heart rate and mean arterial pressure after intraoperative administration in the esketamine group were higher than those in the nalbuphine group, while the delirium incidence during awakening was higher in esketamine group (all P < 0.05). The success rate for the first attempt of endoscope insertion of children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the esketamine group was higher than the nalbuphine group, propofol-related hemodynamic changes were reduced accordingly, while the incidence of esketamine-related adverse effects could be high. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000040500.

Single-bolus dexmedetomidine in prevention of emergence delirium in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A randomized controlled trial.

Emergency delirium (ED), a common postoperative neurologic complication, causes behavioral disturbances leading to self-traumas and also has long-term adverse effects in children. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of a single-bolus dose of dexmedetomidine in reducing the incidence of ED. Additionally, pain relief, number of patients who needed rescue analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events were assessed. One hundred and one patients were randomly allocated into two groups: 50 patients received 15 mL of dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg/kg (group D) and 51 patients received volume-matched normal saline (group C). Hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were monitored regularly throughout the procedure. ED was assessed with Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS), and pain was measured using the modified Objective Pain Score (MOPS). The incidences of ED and pain were higher in group C than group D (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Group D showed significant decrease in MOPS and PAEDS values at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min (P < 0.05), HR at 5 min (P < 0.0243), and SBP at 15 min (P < 0.0127). There was no significant difference in DBP between the two groups at any time point. The mean blood pressure (MBP) at 10 min was significantly less in group D than group C (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg/kg as a single bolus over 10 min immediately after intubation is effective for the prevention of ED and significantly reduces the need of rescue analgesia without compromising the hemodynamic parameters in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery.

Safety and efficacy of esketamine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients with hypospadias.

To explore the safety and efficacy of the combination of continuous intravenous infusion of esketamine with sacral block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for hypospadias. Pediatric patients (n = 77) undergoing surgery for hypospadias were randomized into two groups: a hydromorphone group (H group, initial dose, 0.02 mg/kg; maintenance dose, 0.01 mg/kg/h) or an esketamine group (E group, initial dose, 0.3 mg/kg; maintenance dose 0.15 mg/kg/h). Caudal epidural block involved injection of 0.2% ropivacaine 1 ml/kg through the sacral hiatus. Age, weight, grade of hypospadias, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and awaking time of patients were recorded. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale and Ramsay sedation scores were recorded when leaving the PACU (0 h) and at postoperative 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED), incidence of hypotension, respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting and pruritus, and the time to first bowel movement after surgery were recorded. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the H group and the E group. There were no significant differences in FLACC scores at postoperative 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h in intra-group and inter-group comparisons. There were no significant differences in Ramsay sedation scores at postoperative 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h in the intra-group comparisons. Ramsay sedation scores were significantly lower at postoperative 2, 12, and 36 h in the H group compared to the E group. There were no significant differences in the PAED scale or incidence of nausea and vomiting or pruritus between the H group and the E group. The incidence of hypotension and respiratory depression was significantly lower, and the time to first bowel movement was significantly shorter in the E group compared to the H group. Urinary tryptophan, 5-hydroxytryptamine and substance P levels were significantly lower but arginine was significantly higher in the E group compared to the H group. The combination of continuous intravenous infusion of esketamine with sacral block provided safe and effective postoperative analgesia for pediatric patients undergoing surgery for hypospadias. Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR2200066967. Clinical trial registry URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=185042&htm=4.

Association of volatile anesthesia exposure and depth with emergence agitation and delirium in children: Prospective observational cohort study.

Sevoflurane anesthesia is widely used in pediatric ambulatory surgery. However, emergency agitation (EA) and emergency delirium (ED), as major complications following sevoflurane anesthesia in children, pose risks to surgery and prognosis. Identifying the high risk of EA/ED, especially anesthesia exposure and the depth of anesthesia, may allow preemptive treatment. A total of 137 patients were prospectively enrolled in this single-center observational cohort study to assess the incidence of EA or ED. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to test the association between volatile anesthesia exposure and depth with EA or ED. The Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS), Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED) and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) behavioural pain scale was used to assess the severity of EA or ED severity and pain. Bispectral index (BIS) to monitor the depth of anesthesia, as well as TimeLOW-BIS/TimeANES %, EtSevo (%) and EtSevo-time AUC were included in the multivariate logistic regression model as independent variables to analyze their association with EA or ED. The overall prevalence of EA and ED was 73/137 (53.3%) and 75/137 (54.7%) respectively, where 48/137 (35.0%), 19/137 (13.9%), and 6/137 (4.4%) had mild, moderate, and severe EA. When the recovery period was lengthened, the prevalence of ED and extent of FLACC decreased and finally normalized within 30 min in recovered period. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that intraoperative agitation [2.84 (1.08, 7.47) p = 0.034], peak FLACC [2.56 (1.70, 3.85) p < 0.001] and adverse event (respiratory complications) [0.03 (0.00, 0.29) p = 0.003] were independently associated with higher odds of EA. Taking EtSevo-time AUC ≤ 2,000 as a reference, the incidence of EA were [15.84 (2.15, 116.98) p = 0.002] times and 16.59 (2.42, 113.83) p = 0.009] times for EtSevo-time AUC 2,500-3,000 and EtSevo-time AUC > 3,000, respectively. Peak FLACC [3.46 (2.13, 5.62) p < 0.001] and intraoperative agitation [5.61 (1.99, 15.86) p = 0.001] were independently associated with higher odds of developing ED. EtSevo (%), intraoperative BIS value and the percentage of the duration of anesthesia at different depths of anesthesia (BIS ≤ 40, BIS ≤ 30, BIS ≤ 20) were not associated with EA and ED. For pediatrics undergoing ambulatory surgery where sevoflurane anesthesia was administered, EA was associated with surgical time, peak FLACC, respiratory complications, and "EtSevo-time AUC" with a dose-response relationship; ED was associated with peak FLACC and intraoperative agitation.

Effects of bilateral transmucosal sphenopalatine ganglion block on intraoperative anesthetic requirements and recovery profile in children undergoing palatoplasty under general anesthesia.

Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) given as injection provides excellent perioperative analgesia during palatoplasty. Our objectives were to assess the effect of transmucosal SPGB on anesthetic requirements, intraoperative hemodynamics, recovery time, and emergence delirium in children undergoing palatoplasty. This prospective, randomized study was conducted in 30 children with cleft palate undergoing palatoplasty, divided into two equal groups. After induction and intubation, patients in Group B received bilateral SPGB using cotton-tipped applicators soaked in 2% lignocaine, which were passed through both the nares, and the distal tip was positioned just superior to middle turbinate and anterior to pterygopalatine fossa and sphenopalatine ganglion. In Group C, saline-soaked cotton applicators were used. All patients received general anesthesia as per a standardized protocol. Intraoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure, the requirement of anesthetics, extubation time, and emergence delirium were compared. Compared with Group C, patients in Group B had significantly lower sevoflurane consumption (17.2 ± 2.6 vs. 27.5 ± 5.0mL, P < 0.001) and fentanyl consumption (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.6 μ/kg, P < 0.001).The extubation time was significantly shorter in Group B (3.9 ± 0.7 vs. 9.5 ± 1.6 minutes, P < 0.001). PAED (Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale) scores at 5and 10 minutes were significantly higher in Group C (P < 0.001). Intraoperative heart rate was significantly higher in Group C. Group C had significantly higher mean arterial pressure at 15, 60, and 75 minutes. Preoperative, SPGB administered by mucosal application of local anesthetic significantly reduced sevoflurane and fentanyl requirements, with stable hemodynamics, quicker recovery, and less emergence delirium in children undergoing palatoplasty.

Nalbuphine reduces the incidence of emergence agitation in children undergoing Adenotonsillectomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of nalbuphine on emergence agitation (EA) in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. DesignMulticenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SettingThe First People's Hospital of Foshan and three other participating institutions in China, from April 2020 to December 2021. PatientsEight hundred patients, 3–9 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II, undergoing elective adenotonsillectomy were included. InterventionsNalbuphine (0.1 mg/kg) or saline was administered intravenously. MeasurementsThe incidence of EA; the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scale; and the faces, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scales. Extubation time, duration of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, anesthesia nurses' and parents' satisfaction, and other side effects. Main resultsThe incidence of EA in the nalbuphine group was lower than that in the saline group 30 min after extubation (10.28% vs. 28.39%, P = 0.000). In addition, the FLACC scores in the nalbuphine group were lower than those in the saline group 30 min after extubation (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the proportion of moderate-to-severe pain cases (FLACC scores >3) was significantly lower in the nalbuphine group than in the saline group (33.58% vs. 60.05%, P = 0.000). Adjusting the imbalance of postoperative pain intensity, the risk of EA was still lower in the nalbuphine group at 0 min (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26–0.60; P = 0.000), (OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval), 10 min (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19–0.79; P = 0.01), and 20 min (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08–0.99; P = 0.046) than in the saline group. There were no significant differences in extubation time, duration of PACU stay, nausea and vomiting, or respiratory depression between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionNalbuphine reduced the incidence of EA in children after adenotonsillectomy under general anesthesia, which may be involved in both analgesic and non-analgesic pathways.

Parental presence and intranasal dexmedetomidine for the prevention of anxiety during anesthesia induction in children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: During the perioperative period of pediatric surgery, it is extremely stressful for children and parents to enter the operating room and receive the anesthesia induction. This study was designed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes with parental presence at induction of anesthesia (PPIA), intranasal dexmedetomidine, and combined use of PPIA and intranasal dexmedetomidine. Methods: In this prospective study, 124 children were randomly divided into four groups: control (no parental presence or intranasal dexmedetomidine), PPIA (parental presence), DEX (intranasal dexmedetomidine (1.0μg/kg)), and PPIA + DEX (parental presence and intranasal dexmedetomidine (1.0μg/kg)). The anxiety of children was mainly evaluated by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale-Short Form (mYPAS-SF). Secondary evaluation methods were, for example, the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC), the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED), the COMFORT Behavior Scale (COMFORT-B Scale), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: Children in the PPIA + DEX group exhibited significantly lower mYPAS-SF and ICC scores compared with all three other groups (p < 0.001), and children in that group exhibited significantly lower mYPAS-SF and ICC scores compared with the PPIA and DEX groups (p < 0.05). The children's PAED scores in the PPIA, DEX, and PPIA + DEX groups were significantly lower than the control group (p < 0.001).The STAI-S scores of the PPIA, DEX, and PPIA + DEX groups were significantly lower than the score of the control group (p < 0.001). The VAS scores of the PPIA, DEX, and PPIA + DEX groups were significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.001), while the score of the PPIA + DEX group was significantly higher than those of the PPIA and DEX groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The combined use of PPIA and intranasal dexmedetomidine is more effective than PPIA or intranasal dexmedetomidine for alleviating the preoperative anxiety of children, improving children's induction compliance and parental satisfaction.

Spanish version of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

BackgroundEmergence delirium (ED) is a mental disturbance in children during recovery from general anaesthesia. The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale is the only validated scale that assesses ED in paediatric patients undergoing general anaesthesia. The aim of this study was the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PAED scale into Spanish (Chile). MethodsA five-stage translation and cross-cultural adaptation process was carried out. The reliability of the Spanish version of the PAED scale was evaluated in paediatric patients independently by a set of two raters (anaesthesiologists or postanaesthesia care unit nurses) in the postanaesthetic period after major outpatient surgery. ED was defined by a cut-off level of ≥ 10 points on the PAED scale. ResultsThe PAED scale was evaluated in 353 consecutive children. Patients had a mean age of 7.4 ± 3.22 years. The preoperative ASA Physical Status class was 62%, 37%, and 1% (ASA class I, II and III, respectively). The distribution of patients by service was as follows: 45% of patients underwent paediatric surgery; 33% underwent otorhinolaryngological surgery; 11% underwent orthopaedic surgery; 10% underwent ophthalmological surgery; and 1% underwent other types of surgery. The interrater agreement ranged from 96.9% to 97.9%, with Kappa values ranging from 0.59 to 0.79. The Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.91. The ED global incidence was 9.1% and was higher in the younger age groups (3–10 years).ConclusionsThe translated and cross-culturally adapted Spanish version of the PAED scale is a reliable instrument to measure ED in the postanaesthetic period in Chilean children.