Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale Research Articles

Cost per responder analysis of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

The JADE COMPARE was a multicenter, phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with the objective of comparing the 16-week efficacy and safety of oral abrocitinib 100 or 200 mg once daily, dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks, or placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of these new drugs for AD is lacking. The objective of our study was to compare the cost per responder of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in patients with AD using the data from the JADE COMPARE trial. The cost per responder was calculated by multiplying the cost of treatment by the number needed to treat for each therapy, as obtained from the JADE COMPARE trial. The 12-week primary endpoint was the Investigator global assessment (IGA) 0/1 and eczema area and severity index improvement of at least 75% (EASI75) response rate. The key secondary end points were itch response (defined as an improvement of ≥4 points in the score on the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS; scores range from 0 to 10]) at week 2 and IGA and EASI-75 responses at week 16. The cost per responder model was based on the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Regarding the costs of drugs, ex-factory wholesale purchase prices were used, including the mandatory discounts according to the national legislation (5% discount, plus a further 5% reduction on the discount result). Abrocitinib 100 mg and 200 mg have flat price in Italy. The 12-week IGA 0/1 cost per responder was € 3955.77 and € 2984.94 for abrocitinib 100 mg and 200 mg, respectively, versus € 7467.96 for dupilumab; as for 12-week EASI75 the cost were € 2463.30 and € 2057.58 vs. € 4705.09, respectively. As far as the secondary end points, the costs per responder were always lower for abrocitinib 100 and 200 mg compared to dupilumab, including the PP-NRS (€ 3791.55 and € 2451.22, vs. € 6462.65), the IGA 0/1 at week 16 (€ 6931.05 and € 4854.15 vs. € 8787.85) and the EASI75 at week 16 (€ 3984.75 and € 3381.00 vs. € 5197.45). According to JADE COMPARE trial data, the costs per responder of abrocitinib were considerably lower than dupilumab. The results of the study are limited to the short time frame of JADE COMPARE trial.

Validation of the Peak Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: results from a phase 2 study.

Pruritus is a common, bothersome symptom for patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis (PsO), yet no validated scale assesses it in this patient population. We aimed to validate the Peak Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) using data from a Phase 2b study investigating the efficacy of brepocitinib in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic PsO. Patients completed the PP-NRS daily from baseline for the first 2 weeks after the dose administration and subsequently only on visit days. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), construct validity (known group validity and convergent validity), ability to detect change, and meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) were evaluated using correlation and regression analyses. The PP-NRS demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.86-0.89). Known-group evidence demonstrated that PP-NRS scores could discriminate between different degrees of disease severity. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlation coefficients between the PP-NRS and Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Psoriasis Symptom Inventory, which generally exceeded 0.50. The ability to detect change was evidenced by an approximately linear relationship between changes in PP-NRS and Physician Global Assessment or PtGA of psoriasis scores. The value of 2.8 was determined as the MWPC for the PP-NRS. PP-NRS is a reliable, practical test for assessing pruritus in mild-to-moderate PsO clinical trials. NCT03850483.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Stapokibart in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Open-Label Extension, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Stapokibart/CM310, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-4 receptor α chain, has shown promising treatment benefits in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in previous phase II clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of stapokibart in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Enrolled patients who previously completed parent trials of stapokibart received a subcutaneous stapokibart 600-mg loading dose, then 300mg every 2weeks up to 52weeks. Efficacy outcomes included the proportions of patients with ≥50%/75%/90% improvements from baseline of parent trials in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigator's Global Assessment, and weekly average of the daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale. In total, 127 patients were enrolled, and 110 (86.6%) completed the study. At week52, the Eczema Area and Severity Index-50/75/90 response rates were 96.3%, 87.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. An Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 with a ≥2-point reduction was achieved in 39.3% of patients at week16, increasing to 58.9% at week52. The proportions of patients with ≥3-point and ≥4-point reductions in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively, at week52. Improvement in patients' quality of life was sustained over a 52-week treatment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% of patients, with an exposure-adjusted event rate of 299.2 events/100 patient-years. Coronavirus disease 2019, upper respiratory tract infection, and conjunctivitis were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. Long-term treatment with stapokibart for 52weeks showed high efficacy and good safety profiles, supporting its use as a continuous long-term treatment option for atopic dermatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04893707 (15 May, 2021).

Attentiveness and mental health in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis without ADHD

Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) experience intense chronic itch and impaired sleep. Reports from parents and teachers suggest that AD patients may also have attention problems. However, attention has not yet been directly assessed in AD patients. We utilized an objective, computer-based continuous performance test (CPT) validated for use in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis to formally evaluate attention in adolescent AD subjects. This was a single-visit, cross-sectional, non-interventional study of moderate-to-severe (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] ≥ 3) AD subjects aged 12–17 years without clinician-diagnosed ADHD. Attention was evaluated using two performance-based measures: Conners, CPT-3 and the Stroop Color and Word Test. The primary parameter was CPT-3 detectability (d’) measure. Lesional severity measures included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and body surface area (BSA) involvement. Subjects completed self-report rating scales assessing sensory responsiveness patterns (Adult/Adolescent Sensory Profile [AASP]), itch (Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS]), skin pain, quality of life, sleep, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. A total of 44 subjects were included in the study (61.4% female; mean age 15.0 [SD 1.78] years; mean EASI 20.4 [SD 7.8]; mean PP-NRS 7.0 [SD 1.8]). Results indicated substantial disease impact on sleep, quality of life, and comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms. The mean (SD) Conners, CPT-3 dʹ T-score was 48.7 (SD 10.7), similar to the expected mean from a randomly selected age/gender-matched sample of the general population (50 [SD 10], by definition). Overall, 13.6% of subjects exhibited a dʹ T-score ≥ 60 (clinically significant poor performance), which was not greater than the expected general population value (15.9%). Subject-level data review by two psychologists determined that only 2 subjects demonstrated an overall response pattern that clearly indicated attention deficit. Many subjects had atypical sensory responsiveness profiles: sensory hypersensitivity (38.6%), sensory avoidance (50%), and low registration (hypo-sensitivity, 36.4%). Adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD without existing ADHD diagnosis did not demonstrate greater attention problems on performance-based measures than would be expected in age/gender-matched peers.Trial registration NCT05203380.

A prospective observational cohort study comparing the treatment effectiveness and safety of ciclosporin, dupilumab and methotrexate in adult and paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: results from the UK-Irish A-STAR register.

The main conventional systemic atopic dermatitis (AD) treatments are methotrexate (MTX) and ciclosporin (CyA). Dupilumab was the first novel systemic agent to enter routine clinical practice. There are no head-to-head randomised controlled trials or real-world studies comparing these agents directly. Network meta-analyses provide indirect comparative efficacy and safety data and have shown strong evidence for dupilumab and CyA. The aim of this study was to compare the real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of CyA, dupilumab and MTX in AD. We compared the effectiveness and safety of these systemic agents in a prospective observational cohort study of adult and paediatric patients recruited into the UK-Irish Atopic eczema Systemic TherApy Register (A-STAR). Treatment effectiveness measures included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and children's DLQI (cDLQI). Minimum duration of treatment was 28 days and follow-up was 12 months. Adjusted Cox-regression was used to compare the hazards of achieving EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 over time, and linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate changes in efficacy scores. Treatment safety was assessed by examining adverse events (AEs) at follow-up visits. 488 patients (n=311 adults and n=177 children/adolescents) on dupilumab (n=282), methotrexate (n=149), or CyA (n=57) were included. CyA and MTX were primarily used first line, while dupilumab was mainly a second line systemic as per UK National Institute of Clinical and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations. EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 were achieved more rapidly in the dupilumab and CyA groups compared to MTX. After adjustment for previous severity, the reduction in EASI, POEM, PP-NRS and DLQI was greater for patients treated with dupilumab compared to MTX. In severe patients the reduction in EASI, POEM, and PP-NRS was even greater with CyA. The incidence of AEs was similar across groups (734, 654 and 594 per 10,000 person-month on CyA, dupilumab and MTX respectively). This real-world comparison of CyA, dupilumab and MTX in AD suggests that dupilumab is consistently more effective than MTX and that CyA is most effective in very severe disease within one follow-up year.

Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials

Nemolizumab, an interleukin (IL)-31 receptor subunit α antagonist, inhibits the IL-31 pathway of itch and skin inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Two international phase 3 studies were done to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in atopic dermatitis. In this Article we report results for the 16-week initial treatment period of both trials. ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 were identical 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials in adult and adolescent participants (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, associated pruritus, and inadequate response to topical steroids. Participants were enrolled from 281 clinics, hospitals, and academic centres in 22 countries across both trials, and were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nemolizumab 30 mg subcutaneously (baseline loading dose 60 mg) or matching placebo once every 4 weeks with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI; ie, TCS-TCI background treatment). Randomisation was done via interactive response technology and stratified by baseline disease and pruritus severity. Study staff and participants were masked throughout the study, with outcome assessors masked until database lock. Coprimary endpoints at week 16 post-baseline were Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) success (score of 0 [clear skin] or 1 [almost clear skin] with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline) and at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline (EASI-75 response). Outcome rates were compared between groups with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for randomisation strata. The key secondary endpoints were the proportion of participants with Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score improvement of at least 4 points at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 16; PP-NRS score below 2 at weeks 4 and 16; Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; EASI-75 response plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; and IGA success plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16. Efficacy analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis; safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of nemolizumab or placebo. Both studies are completed (ClinicalTrials.gov: ARCADIA 1, NCT03985943 and ARCADIA 2, NCT03989349). Between Aug 9, 2019, and Nov 2, 2022, 1728 participants were enrolled across both trials: 1142 were allocated to nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI (620 in ARCADIA 1 and 522 in ARCADIA 2) and 586 to placebo plus TCS-TCI (321 in ARCADIA 1 and 265 in ARCADIA 2). ARCADIA 1 included 500 (53%) male participants and 441 (47%) female participants, and ARCADIA 2 included 381 (48%) male participants and 406 (52%) female participants. Mean age ranged from 33·3 (SD 15·6) years to 35·2 (17·0) years across the treatment groups. Both trials met the coprimary endpoints; at week 16, a greater proportion of participants receiving nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI versus placebo plus TCS-TCI had IGA success (ARCADIA 1: 221 [36%] of 620 vs 79 [25%] of 321, adjusted percentage difference 11·5% [97·5% CI 4·7-18·3], p=0·0003; ARCADIA 2: 197 [38%] of 522 vs 69 [26%] of 265, adjusted difference 12·2% [4·6-19·8], p=0·0006) and an EASI-75 response (ARCADIA 1: 270 [44%] vs 93 [29%], adjusted difference 14·9% [7·8-22·0], p<0·0001; ARCADIA 2: 220 [42%] vs 80 [30%], adjusted difference 12·5% [4·6-20·3], p=0·0006). Significant benefits were observed with nemolizumab for all key secondary endpoints including improvement in itch, as early as week 1, and sleep improvement by week 16. The safety profile was similar between nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI and placebo plus TCS-TCI. In the safety sets, 306 (50%) of 616 participants (ARCADIA 1) and 215 (41%) of 519 participants (ARCADIA 2) who received nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in six [1%] and 13 [3%], respectively); and 146 (45%) of 321 (ARCADIA 1) and 117 (44%) of 263 (ARCADIA 2) who received placebo plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in four [1%] and three [1%], respectively). Ten serious treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to nemolizumab were reported in five (1%) participants in ARCADIA 2. No deaths occurred. Nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI was efficacious and showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in inflammation and itch in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Nemolizumab might offer a valuable extension of current therapies if approved. Galderma.

Predicting Abrocitinib Efficacy at Week 12 Based on Clinical Response at Week 4: A Post Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Studies in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

Early prediction of abrocitinib efficacy in atopic dermatitis (AD) could help identify candidates for an early dose increase. A predictive model determined week 12 efficacy based on week 4 responses in patients receiving abrocitinib 100mg/day and assessed the effect of an abrocitinib dose increase on platelet counts. Analysis included the phase 3 trials JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), MONO-2 (NCT03575871), COMPARE (NCT03720470), and TEEN (NCT03796676). For platelet counts and simulations, a phase 2 psoriasis trial (NCT02201524) and phase 2b (NCT02780167) and phase 3 (MONO-1, MONO-2, and REGIMEN (NCT03627767)) abrocitinib trials were pooled. A training-and-validation framework assessed potential predictors of response at week 4: score and score change from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), and percentage change from baseline in EASI. The dependent variables at week 12 were ≥ 75% improvement in EASI (EASI-75) and IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline. The probability of each variable to predict week 12 EASI-75 and IGA responses was calculated. In the training cohort (n = 453), 72% of the ≥ 50% improvement in EASI (EASI-50) at week 4 responders and 16% of the nonresponders with abrocitinib 100mg achieved EASI-75 at week 12; 48% and 6% of the week 4 EASI-50 responders and nonresponders, respectively, achieved week 12 IGA response. Similar results occurred with week 4 IGA = 2, ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in PP-NRS, or EASI = 8 responders/nonresponders. Platelet counts after an abrocitinib dose increase from 100 to 200mg were similar to those seen with continuous dosing with abrocitinib 100mg or 200mg. Achieving week 4 clinical responses with abrocitinib 100mg may be useful in predicting week 12 responses. Week 4 nonresponders may benefit from a dose increase to abrocitinib 200mg, and those that receive this dose increase are likely to achieve treatment success at week 12, with no significant impact on platelet count recovery. Video abstract available for this article. NCT03349060, NCT03575871, NCT03720470, NCT03796676, NCT02201524, NCT02780167 and NCT03627767.

Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Prurigo Nodularis and Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin

Prurigo nodularis (PN) and chronic pruritus of unknown origin (CPUO) are chronic pruritic diseases that dramatically impair quality of life, but therapeutic options are limited. Abrocitinib, a Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, represents a promising therapy for both conditions. To assess the efficacy and safety of 200-mg oral abrocitinib administered once daily in adults with moderate to severe PN or CPUO. This phase 2, open-label, nonrandomized controlled trial conducted between September 2021 and July 2022 took place at a single center in the US. A total of 25 adult patients with moderate to severe PN or CPUO were screened. Ten patients with PN and 10 patients with CPUO were enrolled. All 20 patients completed the 12-week treatment period, 18 of whom completed the 4-week follow-up period. Abrocitinib, 200 mg, by mouth once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change in weekly Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) scores from baseline to week 12. Key secondary end points included the percentage of patients achieving at least a 4-point reduction in weekly PP-NRS score from baseline to week 12 and the percent change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores. A total of 10 patients with PN (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [13.1] years; all were female) and 10 patients with CPUO (mean [SD] age, 70.7 [5.6] years; 2 were female) enrolled in the study. The mean (SD) baseline PP-NRS score was 9.2 (1.0) for PN and 8.2 (1.2) for CPUO. PP-NRS scores decreased by 78.3% in PN (95% CI, -118.5 to -38.1; P < .001) and 53.7% in CPUO (95% CI, -98.8 to -8.6; P = .01) by week 12. From baseline to week 12, 8 of 10 patients with PN and 6 of 10 patients with CPUO achieved at least a 4-point improvement on the PP-NRS. Both groups experienced significant improvement in quality of life as demonstrated by percent change in DLQI scores (PN: -53.2% [95% CI, -75.3% to -31.1%]; P = .002; CPUO: -49.0% [95% CI, -89.6% to -8.0%]; P = .02). The most common adverse event among patients was acneiform eruption in 2 of 20 patients (10%). No serious adverse events occurred. The results of this nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that abrocitinib monotherapy may be effective and tolerated well in adults with PN or CPUO. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05038982.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Chinese Elderly Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Study

Introduction: With the aging of the population in China, the prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) is high in elderly patients. These patients usually have more comorbidities and they need more effective and safer treatments. Dupilumab is an anti-interleukin-4 (IL-4) receptor monoclonal antibody which was approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: Elderly patients (60 years or older) with moderate-to-severe AD who treated with dupilumab were included. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-50 were evaluated. The efficacy in subgroups was also investigated. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled. The EASI score and PP-NRS score were significantly reduced at weeks 4, 16, 28, and 52. 91.2% and 79.4% of the patients achieved EASI-50 and EASI-75 at week 16, respectively. 95.8% and 87.5% patients achieved EASI-50 and EASI-75 at week 52, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 10 (17.2%) patients, and no severe adverse event was reported. Male, older age, and moderate AD (EASI <21) were related to better efficacy. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that dupilumab is effective and safe in elderly patients with AD.

Abrocitinib may improve itch and quality of life in patients with itch-dominant atopic dermatitis.

Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) exhibit heterogeneous clinical phenotypes, reflecting different combinations of itch and lesional severity. AD with severe itch but clear-moderate lesions, also known as itch-dominant AD, is a common clinical phenotype. To evaluate abrocitinib efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who have itch-dominant AD. This post hoc analysis includes pooled data from clinical trials of patients with moderate-to-severe AD receiving abrocitinib (100 or 200mg) as monotherapy (phase 2b; phase 3 JADE MONO-1 and JADE MONO-2) or in combination with topical therapy (phase 3 JADE COMPARE). Data from the ongoing long-term JADE EXTEND trial (data cutoff April 2020) were also evaluated. Itch-dominant AD was defined as baseline Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score of 7-10 and Investigator's Global Assessment of 0-3 or Eczema Area and Severity Index of 0‒21. Assessments included a ≥4-point improvement in PP-NRS (PP-NRS4), PP-NRS score of 0 (no itch) or 1 (little itch) in patients with PP-NRS score ≥2 at baseline, ≥4-point improvement from baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM-4), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of clear or almost clear, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0 or 1 (no impact or little impact of AD on quality of life [QoL]). In the pooled monotherapy trials, 37% of patients had itch-dominant AD at baseline. As early as Week 2, more patients with itch-dominant AD achieved PP-NRS4 with abrocitinib 100mg (35%) and abrocitinib 200mg (57%) versus placebo (7%); 6% and 22% versus 0%, respectively, achieved PP-NRS 0/1. More patients achieved a PtGA of clear/almost clear at Week 12 with abrocitinib 100mg (28%) and abrocitinib 200mg (45%) than placebo (9%). Additionally, abrocitinib led to clinically meaningful improvements in POEM and DLQI. Most patients with itch-dominant AD experienced itch improvement over time with abrocitinib monotherapy or with concomitant topical therapy; 86%-87% and 62%-67% of patients had no itch-moderate itch and clear-moderate lesions by weeks 24 and 48, respectively. Abrocitinib is highly efficacious in patients with itch-dominant AD, demonstrating rapid, deep, and sustained improvements in itch and clinically meaningful improvements in patients' QoL. NCT02780167; NCT03349060; NCT03575871; NCT03720470; NCT03422822.

Efficacy and Safety of Crisaborole Ointment 2% in Chinese Patients Aged ≥ 2 Years with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic immuno-inflammatory skin disease. Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. This post hoc analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in Chinese patients aged ≥ 2years with mild to moderate AD. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in Chinese patients from the vehicle-controlled, phase 3 CrisADe CLEAR study. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive crisaborole or vehicle twice daily, respectively, for 28days. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) total score at day 29. Key secondary endpoints were improvement in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA), ISGA success, and change from baseline in weekly average Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score. Adverse events were documented. Of 391 patients in the overall study, 237 were from China, 157 assigned to crisaborole and 80 assigned to vehicle. A greater reduction in percent change from baseline in EASI total score at day 29 was shown in the crisaborole vs. vehicle group (least squares mean [LSM]: -66.34 [95% (confidence interval) CI -71.55 to -61.12] vs. -50.18 [95% CI -58.02 to -42.34]). Response rates for achievement of ISGA improvement (43.2% [95% CI 35.4-51.1] vs. 33.4% [95% CI 22.5-44.2]) and ISGA success (31.7% [95% CI 24.3-39.0] vs. 21.5% [95% CI 12.1-30.9]) at day 29 were higher in the crisaborole vs. vehicle group. A greater reduction in change from baseline in weekly average PP-NRS score at week 4 was observed in the crisaborole vs. vehicle group (LSM: -1.98 [95% CI -2.34 to -1.62] vs. -1.08 [95% CI -1.63 to -0.53]). No new safety signals were observed. Crisaborole was effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients aged ≥ 2years with mild to moderate AD. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04360187.

Total eosinophil count as a biomarker for therapeutic effects of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis over 48 weeks.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease characterized by type 2-skewed immune responses, and significantly influenced by cytokines dependent on Janus kinases (JAKs). Upadacitinib, a JAK1 inhibitor, is effective for moderate-to-severe AD. This study aims to identify biomarkers that reflect long-term therapeutic effects of upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg. A retrospective study from August 2021 to July 2023 included 213 AD patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg and 70 AD patients with 30 mg. We analyzed eczema area and severity index (EASI), peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS), serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and total eosinophil count (TEC) at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 of treatment. Both treatments with upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg significantly reduced EASI and PP-NRS scores over week 4 to 48 compared to baseline. Upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg treatment significantly decreased TEC compared to baseline through week 4 to 36 or week 4 to 48, respectively. The percent reduction of TEC correlated with those of EASI and PP-NRS through week 4 to 48 of treatment with upadacitinib 15 mg, or through week 12 to 48 with 30 mg, respectively. After adjusting for % reductions of other laboratory markers, the significance of correlations was preserved at weeks 36 and 48 of 15 mg treatment, while at weeks 4 and 36 of 30 mg treatment. The % reduction of TEC correlated with those of EASI and PP-NRS during upadacitinib treatment, indicating its potential as a biomarker reflecting treatment responses to upadacitinib in AD patients. However, the variability of significant correlation during treatment indicates that further inspection is needed for its usefulness in monitoring responses to upadacitinib treatment for AD.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib for Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a real-world clinical study

Background Previous clinical trials presented efficacy and safety of Janus kinase 1 inhibitor upadacitinib through 52 weeks for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib through 48 weeks in real-world clinical practice for Japanese AD patients (aged ≥12 years). Methods This retrospective study included 287 patients with moderate-to severe AD treated with 15 mg (n = 216) or 30 mg (n = 71) of upadacitinib daily. Effectiveness was assessed using eczema area severity index (EASI) scores, atopic dermatitis control tool (ADCT), peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS), and investigator’s global assessment (IGA). Safety was evaluated through the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Results From baseline, EASI, ADCT, PP-NRS, and IGA rapidly reduced at week 4, and the reduction was maintained until week 48 of treatment with upadacitinib at both doses. Achievement rates of EASI 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 at week 48 were 63.5, 30.2, and 7.9 in 15 mg group, and 77.4, 54.8, and 3.2% in 30 mg group, respectively. Acne and herpes zoster were frequent, but no serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions Upadacitinib was therapeutically effective and tolerable for moderate-to-severe AD through 48 weeks in real-world clinical practice.

Sustained Effectiveness of Upadacitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 48-Week Real-World Study.

Clinical trials and real-world studies have shown the effectiveness of upadacitinib for treating rash and pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). This study aimed to determine whether the early reduction in rash or pruritus at week 12 of upadacitinib treatment could be maintained at later treatment stages. This retrospective study involved 227 and 73 patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with 15 and 30 mg upadacitinib daily, respectively. The eczema area and severity index (EASI) scores, peak pruritus numerical rating scale (PP-NRS), and investigator's global assessment (IGA) were analyzed. At week 12, patients were divided into achievers and non-achievers of EASI 75, 90, 100, absolute EASI ≤ 2, IGA0/1, PP-NRS4, or absolute PP-NRS ≤ 1. Achievement rates for each endpoint were assessed at later time points (weeks 24, 36, and 48) in both groups. Week 12 achievers largely maintained their endpoint achievements until week 48, regardless of dosage (15 mg or 30 mg). Week 12 non-achievers saw an increasing achievement rate of EASI 75 until week 48. The initial reduction in rash and pruritus at week 12 persisted until week 48 with upadacitinib treatment, suggesting potential benefits for patients requiring prolonged treatment despite not achieving EASI 75 at week 12.

Efficacy and safety of nemolizumab and topical corticosteroids for prurigo nodularis: results from arandomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II/III clinical study in patients aged ≥ 13 years.

Prurigo nodularis (PN), a chronic inflammatory skin condition, adversely affects the quality of life of affected individuals. Current treatment options for PN in Japan are limited. To evaluate the optimal dose, efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with nemolizumab in patients with PN in Japan. In a 16-week double-blind phase II/III study, patients aged ≥ 13 years with PN were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1) to nemolizumab 30-mg, 60-mg or placebo groups, with concomitant topical corticosteroids, every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in the weekly mean Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score (range 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse itching) from baseline to week 16. Secondary efficacy endpoints assessed the impact of treatment on pruritus, PN severity, sleep and quality of life. At week 16, the least-squares mean percentage change from baseline in the PP-NRS score was -61.1% in the nemolizumab 30-mg group (n = 77), -56.0% in the 60-mg group (n = 76), and -18.6% in the placebo group (n = 76). Differences between both nemolizumab groups and placebo were significant; the difference between the 30-mg and placebo groups was -42.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) -51.9 to -33.1; P < 0.0001], and between the 60-mg and placebo groups was -37.4% (95% CI -46.7 to -28.1; P < 0.0001). Patients treated with nemolizumab also had greater improvements in the number and severity of prurigo nodules, and in sleep and quality of life compared with the placebo group. Both nemolizumab doses were well tolerated. Improvements in PN were greater following nemolizumab treatment, despite continuation of topical corticosteroids in both groups.

Tapinarof Cream 1% Once Daily Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Treatment of Mild to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the Head and Neck Region

Introduction: Tapinarof cream 1% (VTAMA®, Dermavant Sciences, Inc.) is a non-steroidal, topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults with no restrictions on location, extent, or duration of use. In the phase 3 PSOARING trial program, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) for the treatment of plaque psoriasis was efficacious and well tolerated. Plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region occurs commonly, with a high impact on patients’ health-related quality of life, through pruritus and psychological distress. Patients may consider topicals unacceptable for scalp/facial use due to poor cosmetic properties (e.g., greasiness), leading to low medication adherence. There is a need for efficacious, cosmetically elegant, non-steroidal topicals that can be used without restrictions.Objective: To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with tapinarof cream for adults with mild to severe plaque psoriasis in the head and neck region, including the scalp, in a phase 4, open-label trial.Methods: Adults with head and neck region target lesion Physician Global Assessment (tPGA) score of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), or 4 (severe) received tapinarof for 12 weeks. PROs included Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score for the head and neck region; achievement of ≥4-point reduction in PP-NRS score; Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score by visit; and responses to a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire© (PSQ) at Week 12.Results: 31 patients received tapinarof; 58.1% (18/31) had the target lesion on the scalp. Baseline mean PP-NRS (head and neck region) and total DLQI scores were 5.8 and 9.7, respectively, demonstrating significant pruritus and disease impact. Improvement in mean PP-NRS score was demonstrated at Week 1 (–1.6), the earliest assessment, surpassing the minimal clinically important ≥4-point improvement by Week 12 (−4.2). At Week 12, 70.0% (n=14/20) achieved ≥4-point reduction in PP-NRS score. Mean DLQI minimal clinically important difference of −4.0 was demonstrated as early as Week 1 (−4.0), improving to −7.2 at Week 12. Most patients strongly agreed or agreed with PSQ questions assessing satisfaction with cosmetic elegance (93.3%), quick absorption (96.7%), application ease (86.7%), efficacy (83.3%), and confidence in tapinarof (83.3%). Compared with topicals used previously for plaque psoriasis, most strongly agreed or agreed that tapinarof was more effective (76.9%) and easier to use (76.9%).Conclusions: In patients with plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region, tapinarof cream 1% QD demonstrated rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported pruritus and disease impact as early as Week 1, the first assessment, with continued improvement through Week 12. Patients reported high rates of satisfaction and positive perceptions of tapinarof.Funding Support: Dermavant Sciences, Inc.

Efficacy of Abrocitinib and Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis With Severe Itch at Baseline and in Subgroups by Baseline Thresholds of Severe Itch: A Post Hoc Analysis of the JADE COMPARE and JADE DARE Clinical Trials

Introduction: In phase 3 trials, abrocitinib provided more rapid and greater itch relief than dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). We examined the efficacy of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in patients with severe itch at baseline (BL) and in subgroups by BL thresholds of severe itch.Methods: Data were pooled from patients treated with abrocitinib 200 mg or dupilumab 300 mg in JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470) and JADE DARE (NCT04345367). Patients with severe itch at BL (Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS] ≥7), and subgroups by BL PP-NRS 7-10 were assessed for achievement of ≥4-point improvement in PP-NRS (PP-NRS4) and PP-NRS 0/1 (itch free state). Subgroups were also assessed for achievement of Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score ≤2 (clear/almost clear AD), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0/1 (no impact on quality of life [QoL]).Results: This analysis comprised 875 patients (abrocitinib, 453; dupilumab, 422) with severe itch at BL. Median (Q1, Q3) BL score for PP-NRS was 8.0 (7.0, 9.0) in the abrocitinib arm and 8.0 (7.0, 9.0) in the dupilumab arm; 22.0 (19.0, 26.0) and 22.0 (19.0, 27.0) for POEM; 16.0 (11.0, 20.5) and 16.0 (11.0, 20.0) for DLQI. In the overall group, PP-NRS4 responses were greater with abrocitinib versus dupilumab as early as week 2 (56% vs 32%) and sustained through week 16 (73% vs 69%). Stringent PP-NRS 0/1 responses were greater with abrocitinib versus dupilumab at weeks 2 (15% vs 3%) and 16 (35% vs 21%). Across patient subgroups by BL PP-NRS 7-10, greater proportions achieved PP-NRS4 and PP-NRS 0/1 with abrocitinib versus dupilumab at weeks 2 and 16. Greater proportions across subgroups achieved POEM ≤2 with abrocitinib compared with dupilumab at week 16 (BL PP-NRS7, 33% vs 10%; BL PP-NRS8, 29% vs 20%; BL PP-NRS9, 39% vs 16%; BL PP-NRS10, 31% vs 23%). In the overall group, greater proportions achieved DLQI 0/1 with abrocitinib versus dupilumab at weeks 2 (19% vs 6%) and 16 (38% vs 27%). Across subgroups, DLQI 0/1 responses with abrocitinib were generally greater than dupilumab at weeks 2 and 16.Conclusions: In patients with moderate-to-severe AD who had severe itch at BL, abrocitinib provided more rapid and complete/near complete itch relief and improved QoL than dupilumab as early as 2 weeks of treatment. These results were consistent across subgroups by various BL thresholds of severe itch.

Effectiveness of Dose Increase in Upadacitinib from 15 mg to 30 mg for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Clinical Practice in Japan.

Atopic dermatitis is characterized by persistent eczema and pruritus. Janus kinase inhibitors, including upadacitinib, are effective treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. If patients do not respond well to a certain dose of a Janus kinase inhibitor, increasing the dose may improve their treatment responsiveness. We assessed the outcomes of a dose increase in upadacitinib from 15 mg to 30 mg for Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In 23 patients who showed insufficient responses to upadacitinib 15-mg treatment, the dose of upadacitinib was increased to 30 mg. We evaluated total Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), EASI on the head and neck, trunk, upper, or lower limbs, EASI of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification, and Peak Pruritus Numerical-Rating Scale at baseline (onset of upadactinib 15 mg), week 0 (time of increase), and weeks 4 and 12 after the increase. Total EASI, EASI on each anatomical site, EASI of each clinical sign, and Peak Pruritus Numerical-Rating Scale were markedly reduced at weeks 4 or 12 compared with week 0. After the dose increase, the achievement rates of EASI 75 and EASI 90 significantly improved; EASI 75 4.3%, 68.2%, and 66.7%; EASI 90 0%, 18.2%, and 38.1% at weeks 0, 4, and 12, respectively. These results suggest that upadacitinib 30 mg can ameliorate rash and pruritus insufficiently improved by upadacitinib 15 mg, and that the dose increase to 30 mg may be considered as atreatment option for patients with atopic dermatitis with a limited response to upadacitinib 15 mg.

Study Design of a Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Dupilumab in Adults with Bullous Pemphigoid: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare, autoimmune, blistering skin disease associated with high disease burden, profoundly decreased quality of life and increased morbidity. Emerging evidence supports an important role for type 2 inflammation in disease pathogenesis. Current management relies on topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, non-selective immunosuppressants and antibiotics with anti-inflammatory properties, which are all limited by side effects and toxicities. Therefore, targeted, efficacious and safe therapies are needed. Dupilumab blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. Several reports of patients successfully treated with dupilumab have been published; however, dupilumab has not been formally assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We report the design of LIBERTY-BP ADEPT, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with BP. LIBERTY-BP ADEPT comprises a 35-day screening, 52-week treatment and 12-week follow-up period. Approximately 98 adults aged 18-90 years with moderate-to-severe BP are being enrolled at 51 sites on 4 continents and randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo every 2 weeks. All participants will receive concomitant oral corticosteroids (OCS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving complete remission off steroid therapy at week 36. Key secondary endpoints include total cumulative OCS dose to week 36, percent change and proportion of patients with ≥ 4-point reduction in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline to week 36 and percent change in Bullous Pemphigoid Area Index score from baseline to week 36. The trial results will provide evidence on whether the efficacy and safety of dupilumab support its use as a potential novel treatment approach for BP and will provide new insights into the role of type 2 inflammation in BP pathogenesis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04206553.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib in 12 Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis and transcriptome analysis with peripheral blood.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent, pruritic, and localized eczema. Various types of new drugs have been recently investigated for treating AD. The efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in treating AD has been reported in clinical trials, but the real-world data from Japan has not been reported. Herein, we analyzed 12 Japanese patients with AD treated with 100 mg of abrocitinib using our real-world data. We also performed transcriptome analysis with peripheral blood to investigate the effects of abrocitinib on cytokine expressions and inflammatory pathways in AD from three patients. This study included patients with moderate to severe AD treated with abrocitinib at Gunma University Hospital, Japan. All patients were systemic treatment-naïve. All patients received a 100-mg dose of abrocitinib daily, and used strong or very strong topical steroids and moisturizers. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) response analysis revealed that after 4 weeks, 25% (three of 12) of the cases reached a 75% reduction in the EASI score (EASI-75) and a 90% reduction in the EASI score (EASI-90). After 12 weeks, 83.3.% (10 of 12), 41.6% (five of 12), and 16.7% (two of 12) of the patients reached EASI-50, a 75% reduction in the EASI score (EASI-75), and EASI-90. Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale was achieved in nine patients (75%) at week 12. The most frequent adverse reaction was acne (six cases [50%]). Gene Ontology pathway analysis using Differentially expressed genes from RNA sequencing analysis revealed attenuation of defense responses to biotic stimulus, virus, and cytokines. Th2 cytokine expression was not suppressed, but several chemokines, especially CXCL1, were suppressed by abrocitinib treatment. Our results indicate abrocitinib as a fast-acting and highly antipruritic agent that is effective for moderate skin eruptions.