Peak Noise Equivalent Count Rate Research Articles

Monte Carlo simulation of two Siemens Biograph PET/CT system using GATE: Image quality performance

The utilization of Monte Carlo simulation is a highly effective method in advancing research within the field of nuclear medicine. An important software tool for simulating and modeling cutting-edge systems for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE). This research specifically concentrates on two Siemens PET scanners: the Siemens Biograph True point (True V) and Siemens Biograph mcT 20 excel. Our primary objective was to validate the GATE V8.2 simulation in accordance with the NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) NU 2-2018 protocol, using a parallel computing platform on a local cluster of computers. This cluster was managed by the open-source package TORQUE version 6.1.0, which is based on the original wrapper PBS.The results of this validation process for the Siemens Biograph True point (True V) scanner were highly promising. The scatter fraction (SF), peak noise equivalent count rate (NECR), and sensitivity all demonstrated a remarkable level of agreement, with deviations within 10.02%, 5.4%, and 1.57%, respectively. Additionally, the spatial resolution was found to deviate by less than 0.59 mm. Image evaluations demonstrate high-quality results for both Siemens Biograph True point (True V) and Siemens Biograph mcT 20 excel scanners, validating the GATE simulation. The study on acquisition time provides insights into optimizing computing simulation time.This research demonstrates the effectiveness of Monte Carlo simulation, facilitated by GATE, in accurately modeling advanced PET systems. The validation results affirm the reliability of GATE V8.2 in accordance with NEMA standards for the Siemens Biograph True point (True V) scanner. The high-quality images obtained from GATE-validated scanners underscore the potential of this simulation approach in advancing nuclear medicine research. Additionally, the study on acquisition time provides valuable considerations for optimizing simulation efficiency.

Performance characteristics of the 5-ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanner using AAPM TG-126 report.

To report on the performance characteristics of the 5-ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT systems using the AAPM TG-126 report and compare these results to NEMA NU 2-2012 where applicable. TG-126 testing was performed on two GE 5-Rings Discovery MI scanners. Tests performed included spatial resolution, PET/CT image-registration accuracy, sensitivity, count rate performance, accuracy of corrections, image contrast, scatter/attenuation correction, and image uniformity. All acquired data were analyzed using scanner console or free software tools as described by TG-126 and the results were then compared to published NEMA NU 2-2012 values. Both scanners gave similar resolution results for TG-126 and NEMA NU 2-2012 and were within manufacturer specifications. Image-registration accuracy between PET and CT using our clinical protocol showed excellent results with values≤1mm. Sensitivity using TG-126 was 19.43cps/kBq while for NEMA the value was 20.73cps/kBq. The peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 2174 kcps at 63.1 kBq/mL and is not comparable to NEMA NU 2-2012 due to differences in phantoms and methods used to measure and calculate this parameter. The accuracy of corrections for count losses for TG-126 were expressed in SUV values and found to be within 10% of the expected SUV measurement of 1. Image contrast and scatter/attenuation correction using the TG-126 method gave acceptable results. Image uniformity assessment resulted in values within the recommended±5% limits. These results show that the 5-ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanner testing using TG-126 is reproducible and has similar results to NEMA NU 2-2012 tests where applicable. We hope these results start to form the basis to compare PET/CT systems using TG-126.

Setup and characterisation according to NEMA NU 4 of the phenoPET scanner, a PET system dedicated for plant sciences

Objective. The phenoPET system is a plant dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) scanner consisting of fully digital photo multipliers with lutetium–yttrium oxyorthosilicate crystals and located inside a custom climate chamber. Here, we present the setup of phenoPET, its data processing and image reconstruction together with its performance. Approach. The performance characterization follows the national electrical manufacturers association (NEMA) standard for small animal PET systems with a number of adoptions due to the vertical oriented bore of a PET for plant sciences. In addition temperature stability and spatial resolution with a hot rod phantom are addressed. Main results. The spatial resolution for a 22Na point source at a radial distance of 5 mm to the center of the field-of-view (FOV) is 1.45 mm, 0.82 mm and 1.88 mm with filtered back projection in radial, tangential and axial direction, respectively. A hot rod phantom with 18F gives a spatial resolution of up to 1.6 mm. The peak noise-equivalent count rates are 550 kcps @ 35.08 MBq, 308 kcps @ 33 MBq and 45 kcps @ 40.60 MBq for the mouse, rat and monkey size scatter phantoms, respectively. The scatter fractions for these phantoms are 12.63%, 22.64% and 55.90%. We observe a peak sensitivity of up to 3.6% and a total sensitivity of up to S A,tot = 2.17%. For the NEMA image quality phantom we observe a uniformity of %STD = 4.22% with ordinary Poisson maximum likelihood expectation-maximization with 52 iterations. Here, recovery coefficients of 0.12, 0.64, 0.89, 0.93 and 0.91 for 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm and 5 mm rods are obtained and spill-over ratios of 0.08 and 0.14 for the water-filled and air-filled inserts, respectively. Significance. The phenoPET and its laboratory are now in routine operation for the administration of [11C]CO2 and non-invasive measurement of transport and allocation of 11C-labelled photoassimilates in plants.

Performance Evaluation of the uMI Panorama PET/CT System in Accordance with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2018 Standard.

The uMI Panorama is a novel PET/CT system using silicon photomultiplier and application-specific integrated circuit technologies and providing exceptional spatial and time-of-flight (TOF) resolutions. The objective of this study was to assess the physical performance of the uMI Panorama in accordance with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2018 standard. Methods: Spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, accuracy, image quality, and TOF resolution were evaluated in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the NEMA NU 2-2018 standard. Energy resolution was determined using the same dataset acquired for the count rate performance evaluation. Images from a Hoffman brain phantom, a mini-Derenzo phantom, and 3 patient studies were evaluated to demonstrate system performance. Results: The transaxial spatial resolution at full width at half maximum was measured as 2.88 mm with a 1-cm offset from the center axial field of view. The sensitivity at the center axial field of view was 20.1 kcps/MBq. At an activity concentration of 73.0 kBq/mL, the peak noise-equivalent count rate (NECR) reached 576 kcps with a scatter fraction of approximately 33.2%. For activity concentrations at or below the peak NECR, the maximum relative count rate error among all slices remained consistently below 3%. When assessed using the NEMA image quality phantom, overall image contrast recovery ranged from 63.2% to 88.4%, whereas background variability ranged from 4.2% to 1.1%. TOF resolution was 189 ps at 5.3 kBq/mL and was consistently lower than 200 ps for activity concentrations at or below the peak NECR. The patient studies demonstrated that scans at 2 min/bed produced images characterized by low noise and high contrast. Clear delineation of nuclei, spinal cords, and other substructures of the brain was observed in the brain PET images. Conclusion: uMI Panorama, the world's first commercial PET system with sub-200-ps TOF resolution, demonstrated fine spatial and fast TOF resolutions, robust count rate performance, and high quantification accuracy across a wide range of activity levels. This advanced technology offers enhanced diagnostic capability for detecting small and low-contrast lesions while showing promising potential under high-count-rate imaging scenarios.

An extended bore length solid-state digital-BGO PET/CT system: design, preliminary experience, and performance characteristics.

A solid-state PET/CT system uses bismuth germanium oxide (BGO) scintillating crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers over an extended 32 cm axial field-of-view (FOV) to provide high spatial resolution and very high sensitivity. Performance characteristics were determined for this digital-BGO system, including NEMA and EARL standards. Spatial resolution, scatter fraction (SF), noise equivalent count rate (NECR), sensitivity, count rate accuracy, and image quality (IQ) were evaluated for the digital-BGO system as per NEMA NU 2-2018, at 2 sites of first clinical install. System energy resolution was measured. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction (BPL) was used for IQ. EARL Standards 2 studies were reconstructed by BPL combined with a contrast-enhancing deep learning algorithm. An Esser PET phantom was evaluated. Three patient examples were obtained with low-dose radiotracer activity: 2 MBq/kg of [18F]FDG ([18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose), 2.3 MBq/kg [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE ([dodecane tetra-acetic acid,Tyr3]-octreotate), and 14.5 MBq/kg [82Rb]RbCl ([82Rb]-rubidium-chloride). Total scan times were ≤ 8 min. NEMA sensitivity was 47.6 cps/kBq at the axial center. Spatial resolution at 1 cm from the center axis was ≤4.5 mm (filtered back projection) and ≤3.8 mm (ordered subset expectation maximization). SF was 35.6%, count rate accuracy was 2.16%, and peak NECR was 485.2 kcps at 16.9 kBq/mL. Contrast for IQ was 61.1 to 90.7% (smallest to largest sphere) with background variations from 7.6 to 2.1%, and a "lung" error of 4.7%. The average detector energy resolution was 9.67%. Image quality for patient scans was good. EARL Standards 2 criteria were robustly met and Esser phantom features ≥4.8 mm were resolved at 2 min per bed position. A solid-state 32 cm axial FOV digital-BGO PET/CT system provides good spatial and energy resolution, high count rates, and superior NEMA sensitivity in its class, enabling fast clinical acquisitions with low-dose radiotracer activity.

Performance Characteristics of a New-Generation Digital Bismuth Germanium Oxide PET/CT System, Omni Legend 32, According to NEMA NU 2-2018 Standards.

The Omni Legend 32 PET/CT system features silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based detectors with bismuth germanium oxide crystals and a 32-cm axial field of view (FOV). The present study aimed to determine the performance characteristics of the Omni Legend 32 PET/CT system according to National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2018 standards. Methods: The PET component of this system comprises 22 detector modules; each module contains 24 detector blocks with 72 bismuth germanium oxide crystals with a volume of 4.1 × 4.1 × 30 mm coupled to 18 SiPM devices with a 6 × 6 mm area, resulting in an axial FOV of 32 cm. The spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, and image quality delivered by PET were evaluated using the NEMA NU 2-2018 standard. PET images of 2 patients were evaluated to get a visual first impression of the Omni Legend 32 PET/CT system together with Precision DL. Results: The average spatial resolution at 1, 10, and 20 cm from the central axis was 4.3, 5.3, and 6.2 mm, respectively, for filtered backprojection and 3.7, 4.3, and 5.1 mm, respectively, for ordered-subset expectation maximization. The NEMA sensitivity was 47.30 and 47.05 cps/kBq at the axial center of the FOV and at a 10-cm radial offset, respectively. The scatter fraction, count rate accuracy, and peak noise-equivalent count rates were 35.4%, 1.7%, and 501.7 kcps, respectively, at 15.7 kBq/mL. Contrast recovery for the NEMA body phantom from the smallest to the largest sphere ranged from 61.3% to 93.0%, with a background variability of 5.4%-11.7% and a lung error of 5.1% for Q.Clear (β-value, 50). Good patient image quality was obtained with the Omni Legend 32. Conclusion: The Omni Legend 32 has class-leading sensitivity and count rates within the category of whole-body PET systems while maintaining spatial resolution broadly comparable to that of other current SiPM-based PET/CT systems. This combination of properties results in a very good image quality.

Performance evaluation of the PennPET explorer with expanded axial coverage

Objective. This work evaluated the updated PennPET Explorer total-body (TB) PET scanner, which was extended to 6 rings with updated readout firmware to achieve a 142 cm axial field of view (AFOV) without 7.6 cm inter-ring axial gaps. Approach. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2018 measurements were performed with modifications including longer phantoms for sensitivity and count-rate measurements and additional positions for spatial resolution and image quality. A long uniform phantom and the clinical trials network (CTN) phantom were also used. Main results. The total sensitivity increased to 140 kcps MBq−1 for a 70 cm line, a gain of 1.8x compared to the same system with axial gaps; an additional 47% increase in total counts was observed with a 142 cm line at the same activity per cm. The noise equivalent count rate (NECR) increased by 1.8x without axial gaps. The peak NECR is 1550 kcps at 25 kBq cc−1 for a 140 cm phantom; due to increased randoms, the NECR is lower than with a 70 cm phantom, for which NECR is 2156 kcps cc−1 at 25 kBq cc−1 and continues increasing. The time-of-flight resolution is 250 ps, increasing by <10 ps at the highest activity. The axial spatial resolution degrades by 0.6 mm near the center of the AFOV, compared to 4 mm resolution near the end. The NEMA image quality phantom showed consistent contrast recovery throughout the AFOV. A long uniform phantom demonstrated axial uniformity of uptake and noise, and the CTN phantom demonstrated quantitative accuracy for both 18F and 89Zr. Significance. The performance evaluation of the updated PennPET Explorer demonstrates significant gains compared to conventional scanners and shows where the current NEMA standard needs to be updated for TB-PET systems. The comparisons of systems with and without inter-ring gaps demonstrate the performance trade-offs of a more cost-effective TB-PET system with incomplete detector coverage.

Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability

BackgroundSimPET-L and SimPET-XL have recently been introduced with increased transaxial fields of view (FOV) compared with their predecessors (SimPET™ and SimPET-X), enabling whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of rats. We conducted performance evaluations of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL and rat-body imaging with SimPET-XL to demonstrate the benefits of increased axial and transaxial FOVs.ProceduresThe detector blocks in SimPET-L and SimPET-XL consist of two 4 × 4 silicon photomultiplier arrays coupled with 20 × 9 array lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals. SimPET-L and SimPET-XL have an inner diameter (bore size) of 7.6 cm, and they are composed of 40 and 80 detector blocks yielding axial lengths of 5.5 and 11 cm, respectively. Each system was evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU4-2008 protocol. Rat imaging studies, such as 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET, were performed using SimPET-XL.ResultsThe radial resolutions at the axial center measured using the filtered back projection, 3D ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM), and 3D OSEM with point spread functions correction were 1.7, 0.82, and 0.82 mm FWHM in SimPET-L and 1.7, 0.91, and 0.91 mm FWHM in SimPET-XL, respectively. The peak sensitivities of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL were 6.30% and 10.4% for an energy window of 100–900 keV and 4.44% and 7.25% for a window of 250–750 keV, respectively. The peak noise equivalent count rate with an energy window of 250–750 keV was 249 kcps at 44.9 MBq for SimPET-L and 349 kcps at 31.3 MBq for SimPET-XL. In SimPET-L, the uniformity was 4.43%, and the spill-over ratios in air- and water-filled chambers were 5.54% and 4.10%, respectively. In SimPET-XL, the uniformity was 3.89%, and the spill-over ratio in the air- and water-filled chambers were 3.56% and 3.60%. Moreover, SimPET-XL provided high-quality images of rats.ConclusionSimPET-L and SimPET-XL show adequate performance compared with other SimPET systems. In addition, their large transaxial and long axial FOVs provide imaging capability for rats with high image quality.

Design and performance simulation studies of a breast PET insert integrable into a clinical whole-body PET/MRI scanner

Objective. Three different breast positron emission tomography (PET) insert geometries are proposed for integration into an existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast coil (Breast Biopsy Coil, NORAS MRI products) to be used inside a whole-body PET/MRI scanner (Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthineers) to enhance the sensitivity and spatial resolution of imaging inside the breast. Approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to predict and compare the performance characteristics of the three geometries in terms of the sensitivity, spatial resolution, scatter fraction, and noise equivalent count rate (NECR). In addition, the background single count rate due to organ uptake in a clinical scan scenario was predicted using a realistic anthropomorphic phantom. Main results. In the center of the field of view (cFOV), absolute sensitivities of 3.1%, 2.7%, and 2.2% were found for Geometry A (detectors arranged in two cylinders), Geometry B (detectors arranged in two partial cylinders), and Geometry C (detectors arranged in two half cylinders combined with two plates), respectively. The full width at half maximum spatial resolution was determined to be 1.7 mm (Geometry A), 1.8 mm (Geometry B) and 2.0 mm (Geometry C) at 5 mm from the cFOV. Designs with multiple scintillation-crystal layers capable of determining the depth of interaction (DOI) strongly improved the spatial resolution at larger distances from the transaxial cFOV. The system scatter fractions were 33.1% (Geometries A and B) and 32.3% (Geometry C). The peak NECRs occurred at source activities of 300 MBq (Geometry A), 310 MBq (Geometry B) and 340 MBq (Geometry C). The background single-event count rates were 17.1 × 106 cps (Geometry A), 15.3 × 106 cps (Geometry B) and 14.8 × 106 cps (Geometry C). Geometry A in the three-layer DOI variant exhibited the best PET performance characteristics but could be challenging to manufacture. Geometry C had the lowest impact on the spatial resolution and the lowest sensitivity among the investigated geometries. Significance. Geometry B in the two-layer DOI variant represented an effective compromise between the PET performance and manufacturing difficulty and was found to be a promising candidate for the future breast PET insert.

Evaluation of the performance of a high-resolution time-of-flight PET system dedicated to the head and breast according to NEMA NU 2-2012 standard

BackgroundThis study evaluated the physical performance of a positron emission tomography (PET) system dedicated to the head and breast according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU2-2012 standard.MethodsThe spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction, count rate characteristics, corrections for count losses and randoms, and image quality of the system were determined. All measurements were performed according to the NEMA NU2-2012 acquisition protocols, but image quality was assessed using a brain-sized phantom. Furthermore, scans of the three-dimensional (3D) Hoffmann brain phantom and mini-Derenzo phantom were acquired to allow visual evaluation of the imaging performance for small structures.ResultsThe tangential, radial, and axial full width at half maximum (FWHM) at a 10-mm offset in half the axial field of view were measured as 2.3, 2.5, and 2.9 mm, respectively. The average system sensitivity at the center of the field of view and at a 10-cm radial offset was 7.18 and 8.65 cps/kBq, respectively. The peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 35.2 kcps at 4.8 kBq/ml. The corresponding scatter fraction at the peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 46.8%. The peak true rate and scatter fraction at 8.6 kBq/ml were 127.8 kcps and 54.3%, respectively. The percent contrast value for a 10-mm sphere was approximately 50%. On the 3D Hoffman brain phantom image, the structures of the thin layers composing the phantom were visualized on the sagittal and coronal images. On the mini-Derenzo phantom, each of the 1.6-mm rods was clearly visualized.ConclusionTaken together, these results indicate that the head- and breast-dedicated PET system has high resolution and is well suited for clinical PET imaging.

Performance evaluation of VRAIN: a brain-dedicated PET with a hemispherical detector arrangement

Objective. For PET imaging systems, a smaller detector ring enables less intrinsic spatial resolution loss due to the photon non-collinearity effect as well as better balance between production cost and sensitivity, and a hemispherical detector arrangement is more appropriate for brain imaging than a conventional cylindrical arrangement. Therefore, we have developed a brain-dedicated PET system with a hemispherical detector arrangement, which has been commercialized in Japan under the product name of VRAINTM. In this study, we evaluated imaging performance of VRAIN. Approach. The VRAIN used 54 detectors to form the main hemispherical unit and an additional half-ring behind the neck. Each detector was composed of a 12 × 12 array of lutetium fine silicate crystals (4.1 × 4.1 × 10 mm3) and a 12 × 12 array of silicon photomultipliers (4 × 4 mm2 active area) with the one-to-one coupling. We evaluated the physical performance of VRAIN according to the NEMA NU 2–2018 standards. Some measurements were modified so as to fit the hemispherical geometry. In addition, we performed 18F-FDG imaging in a healthy volunteer. Main results. In the phantom study, the VRAIN showed high resolution for separating 2.2 mm rods, 229 ps TOF resolution and 19% scatter fraction. With the TOF gain for a 20 cm diameter object (an assumed head diameter), the peak noise-equivalent count rate was 144 kcps at 9.8 kBq ml−1 and the sensitivity was 25 kcps MBq−1. Overall, the VRAIN provided excellent image quality in phantom and human studies. In the human FDG images, small brain nuclei and gray matter structures were clearly visualized with high contrast and low noise. Significance. We demonstrated the excellent imaging performance of VRAIN, which supported the advantages of the hemispherical detector arrangement.

Performance based on NEMA NU-4 2008 Standard of CDTN/CNEN’s Small Animal PET Scanner

This study aimed to evaluate the general performance of the preclinical PET scanner (LabPET Solo 4, GE) at CDTN/CNEN using the NEMA NU 4-2008 protocol. The performance parameters include: (i) spatial resolution; (ii) scatter fraction and counts rate performance; (iii) sensitivity and (iv) image quality. For the evaluation specific simulators and a sealed radioactive source of Sodium-22 were used. The results revealed that the NEMA-based radial spatial resolution ranged from 1.79 mm at the center of the FOV to 2.49 mm at a radial offset of 25mm. Tangential resolution ranged from 1.95mm at the center of the FOV to 3.50mm at a radial offset of 25mm. Axial resolution ranged from 1.78mm at the center of the FOV to 5.42mm at a radial offset of 25mm. Iterative image reconstruction improved the radial spatial resolution to 0.93mm at the center of the FOV. For the mouse-sized phantom, the peak noise equivalent count rate (NECR) was 37.8kcps at 85MBq whereas the peak true count rate was 169.9kcps at 125MBq with a count loss of 7.8% for the maximum rate reached at 103.3MBq. The peak of sensitivity (S) and absolute sensitivity (SA) at the center of axial field-of-view (FOV) is 5.7cps.Bq-1 and 0.63%, respectively. The overall imaging capabilities of the scanner were assessed using the NEMA image-quality phantom. The image roughness was 9.5%. Spillover rates (SORs) in air and in water were 0.26 and 0.17 respectively. The recovery coefficients (RCs) were 0.12 for the 1-mm-diameter rod and 0.91 for the 5-mm-diameter rod. The results demonstrate that CDTN/CNENsmall animal PET scanner has adequate reliability and acquired images are compatible with international quality standards for the molecular imaging research.

Performance Evaluation of a PET of 7T Bruker Micro-PET/MR Based on NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards

Purpose: This study aimed to measure the performance evaluation of the Bruker sequential micro-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) scanner by following National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 4-2008 standards’ protocol. The system consists of a high-performance silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) advanced technology detector and a continuous lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) crystal. Methods: A 22Na (sodium-22) point source was utilized to assess the spatial resolution and system sensitivity, and the Micro-PET scatter phantom measurements were conducted to measure count rate measurements and scatter fractions (SF). A mouse-like Micro-PET image quality (IQ) phantom was utilized as a model to analyze the uniformity, recovery coefficient (RC), and spillover ratio (SOR). A small animal PET/MRI imaging study was performed in a rat. Results: We calculated the spatial resolutions of filtered back-projection (FBP), and used 3D-MLEM to reconstruct PET images at the axial center and ¼ of the axial field of view (FOV) in axial, radial, and tangential directions. The best observed spatial resolutions in both reconstructed images were obtained in the tangential direction, and the values were 0.80 mm in 3D-MLEM and 0.94 mm in FBP. The peak noise equivalent count rate (NECR) in the 358–664 keV energy window was 477.30 kcps at 95.83 MBq and 774.45 kcps at 103.6 MBq for rat and mouse-sized scatter phantoms, respectively. The rat and mouse-sized phantoms scatter fractions (SF) were 14.2% and 6.9%, respectively. Conclusions: According to our results, the performance characteristics of the scanner are high sensitivity, good spatial resolution, low scatter fraction, and good IQ, indicating that it is suitable for preclinical imaging studies.

Evaluation of a High-Sensitivity Organ-Targeted PET Camera

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of the Radialis organ-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) Camera with standardized tests and through assessment of clinical-imaging results. Sensitivity, count-rate performance, and spatial resolution were evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU-4 standards, with necessary modifications to accommodate the planar detector design. The detectability of small objects was shown with micro hotspot phantom images. The clinical performance of the camera was also demonstrated through breast cancer images acquired with varying injected doses of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) and qualitatively compared with sample digital full-field mammography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whole-body (WB) PET images. Micro hotspot phantom sources were visualized down to 1.35 mm-diameter rods. Spatial resolution was calculated to be 2.3 ± 0.1 mm for the in-plane resolution and 6.8 ± 0.1 mm for the cross-plane resolution using maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction. The system peak noise equivalent count rate was 17.8 kcps at a 18F-FDG concentration of 10.5 kBq/mL. System scatter fraction was 24%. The overall efficiency at the peak noise equivalent count rate was 5400 cps/MBq. The maximum axial sensitivity achieved was 3.5%, with an average system sensitivity of 2.4%. Selected results from clinical trials demonstrate capability of imaging lesions at the chest wall and identifying false-negative X-ray findings and false-positive MRI findings, even at up to a 10-fold dose reduction in comparison with standard 18F-FDG doses (i.e., at 37 MBq or 1 mCi). The evaluation of the organ-targeted Radialis PET Camera indicates that it is a promising technology for high-image-quality, low-dose PET imaging. High-efficiency radiotracer detection also opens an opportunity to reduce administered doses of radiopharmaceuticals and, therefore, patient exposure to radiation.

Performance evaluation of dedicated brain PET scanner with motion correction system.

Various motion correction (MC) algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) have been proposed to accelerate the diagnostic performance and research in brain activity and neurology. We have incorporated MC system-based optical motion tracking into the brain-dedicated time-of-flight PET scanner. In this study, we evaluate the performance characteristics of the developed PET scanner when performing MC in accordance with the standards and guidelines for the brain PET scanner. We evaluate the spatial resolution, scatter fraction, count rate characteristics, sensitivity, and image quality of PET images. The MC evaluation is measured in terms of the spatial resolution and image quality that affect movement. In the basic performance evaluation, the average spatial resolution by iterative reconstruction was 2.2 mm at 10 mm offset position. The measured peak noise equivalent count rate was 38.0 kcps at 16.7 kBq/mL. The scatter fraction and system sensitivity were 43.9% and 22.4 cps/(Bq/mL), respectively. The image contrast recovery was between 43.2% (10 mm sphere) and 72.0% (37 mm sphere). In the MC performance evaluation, the average spatial resolution was 2.7 mm at 10 mm offset position, when the phantom stage with the point source translates to ± 15 mm along the y-axis. The image contrast recovery was between 34.2 % (10 mm sphere) and 66.8 % (37 mm sphere). The reconstructed images using MC were restored to their nearly identical state as those at rest. Therefore, it is concluded that this scanner can observe more natural brain activity.

High-resolution and high-sensitivity PET for quantitative molecular imaging of the monoaminergic nuclei: A GATE simulation study.

Quantitative in vivo molecular imaging of fine brain structures requires high-spatial resolution and high-sensitivity. Positron emission tomography (PET) is an attractive candidate to introduce molecular imaging into standard clinical care due to its highly targeted and versatile imaging capabilities based on the radiotracer being used. However, PET suffers from relatively poor spatial resolution compared to other clinical imaging modalities, which limits its ability to accurately quantify radiotracer uptake in brain regions and nuclei smaller than 3 mm in diameter. Here we introduce a new practical and cost-effective high-resolution and high-sensitivity brain-dedicated PET scanner, using our depth-encoding Prism-PET detector modules arranged in a conformal decagon geometry, to substantially reduce the partial volume effect and enable accurate radiotracer uptake quantification in small subcortical nuclei. Two Prism-PET brain scanner setups were proposed based on our 4-to-1 and 9-to-1 coupling of scintillators to readout pixels using mm3 and mm3 crystal columns, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations of our Prism-PET scanners, Siemens Biograph Vision, and United Imaging EXPLORER were performed using Geant4 application for tomographic emission (GATE). National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) standard was followed for the evaluation of spatial resolution, sensitivity, and count-rate performance. An ultra-micro hot spot phantom was simulated for assessing image quality. A modified Zubal brain phantom was utilized for radiotracer imaging simulations of 5-HT1A receptors, which are abundant in the raphe nuclei (RN), and norepinephrine transporters, which are highly concentrated in the bilateral locus coeruleus (LC). The Prism-PET brain scanner with 1.5 mm crystals is superior to that with 1 mm crystals as the former offers better depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution, which is key to realizing compact and conformal PET scanner geometries. We achieved uniform 1.3 mm full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) spatial resolutions across the entire transaxial field-of-view (FOV), a NEMA sensitivity of 52.1 kcps/MBq, and a peak noise equivalent count rate (NECR) of 957.8 kcps at 25.2 kBq/mL using 450-650 keV energy window. Hot spot phantom results demonstrate that our scanner can resolve regions as small as 1.35 mm in diameter at both center and 10 cm away from the center of the transaixal FOV. Both 5-HT1A receptor and norepinephrine transporter brain simulations prove that our Prism-PET scanner enables accurate quantification of radiotracer uptake in small brain regions, with a 1.8-fold and 2.6-fold improvement in the dorsal RN as well as a 3.2-fold and 4.4-fold improvement in the bilateral LC compared to the Biograph Vision and EXPLORER, respectively. Based on our simulation results, the proposed high-resolution and high-sensitivity Prism-PET brain scanner is a promising cost-effective candidate to achieve quantitative molecular neuroimaging of small but important brain regions with PET clinicallyviable.

NEMA NU 4-2008 performance evaluation and MR compatibility tests of an APD-based small animal PET-insert for simultaneous PET/MR imaging

An avalanche photodiode (APD)-based small animal positron emission tomography (PET)-insert was fully evaluated for its PET performance, as well as potential influences on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performance. This PET-insert has an extended axial field of view (FOV) compared with the previous design to increase system sensitivity, as well as an updated cooling and temperature regulation to enable stable and reproducible PET acquisitions. The PET performance was evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU4-2008 protocol. The energy and timing resolution’s full width at half maximum were 16.1% and 4.7 ns, respectively. The reconstructed radial spatial resolution of the PET-insert was 1.8 mm full width at half maximum at the center FOV using filtered back projection for reconstruction and sensitivity was 3.68%. The peak noise equivalent count rates were 70 kcps for a rat-like and 350 kcps for a mouse-like phantom, respectively. Image quality phantom values and contrast recovery were comparable to state-of-the art PET-inserts and standalone systems. Regarding MR compatibility, changes in the mean signal-to-noise ratio for turbo spin echo and echo-planar imaging sequences were below 8.6%, for gradient echo sequences below 1%. Degradation of the mean homogeneity was below 2.3% for all tested sequences. The influence of the PET-insert on the B 0 maps was negligible and no influence on functional MRI sequences was detected. A mouse and rat imaging study demonstrated the feasibility of in vivo simultaneous PET/MRI.

Physical and imaging performance of SIAT aPET under different energy windows and timing windows.

The performance of small animal PET scanners depends on the energy window (EW) and timing window (TW). In National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Standards Publication NU 4-2008, detailed procedures of the performance measurements are defined, but the EW and TW are not specified. In this work, the effects of EW and TW on the physical and imaging performance of Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology small animal PET (SIAT aPET) will be evaluated. First, the flood histogram, energy resolution, and timing resolution were measured for a detector of SIAT aPET. Second, the spatial resolutions were measured with different EWs. Third, the sensitivities, the scatter fractions (SFs), and noise equivalent count rates (NECRs) of a mouse-sized phantom and a rat-sized phantom, the recovery coefficients (RCs) of rods of different sizes, and the percentage standard deviation (%STD) of the NEMA image quality phantom were measured for different EWs and TWs. Last, images of a hot rod phantom, a mouse heart, and a rat brain were acquired from the scanner with different EWs. The SIAT aPET detectors provided good flood histograms such that all but the corner crystals can be resolved even with lower energies of 250-350keV, an average energy resolution of 21.1 ± 1.9%, and an average timing resolution of 2.63 ± 0.69ns. The average spatial resolutions obtained with EWs of 250-350keV and 450-550keV are 0.68mm and 0.75mm. For EWs of 250-750keV, 350-750keV, and 450-750keV with a fixed TW of 12ns, the sensitivities at the center of field of view (FOV) are 16.0%, 11.9%, and 8.2%, the peak NECRs of a mouse-sized phantom are 355.6 kcps, 324.4 kcps, and 249.4 kcps, and the peak NECRs of a rat-sized phantom are 148.5 kcps, 144.3 kcps, and 117.7 kcps, respectively. For the TWs of 4ns, 8ns,12ns, and 20ns with a fixed EW of 350-750keV, the sensitivities at the center of FOV are 9.6%, 11.4%, 11.9%, and 12.2%, the peak NECRs of a mouse-sized phantom are 260.1 kcps, 311.5 kcps, 324.4 kcps and 324.9 kcps, and the peak NECRs of a rat-sized phantom are 110.5 kcps, 137.3 kcps, 144.3 kcps, and 142.6 kcps, respectively. Narrowing the EW and TW improves the RCs of rods of all sizes, and the %STD of images obtained with different EWs and TWs are similar. Rods with diameter down to 0.8mm can be visually resolved from images of the hot rod phantom obtained with different EWs. Images of mouse heart with high spatial resolution and rat brain with detail brain structure were obtained with different EWs. Images of both phantom and in vivo animals obtained with different EWs only showed subtle difference. The performance of SIAT aPET under different EWs and TWs was compared. The EW and TW affect the sensitivity, SF, and NECR but not the spatial resolution and animal images of SIAT aPET, which imply that careful optimization of the EW and TW is not required.

Characterization and Pilot Human Trial of Dedicated Breast Ring Positron Emission Tomography (BRPET) System

We describe the design and performance of BRPET, a novel dedicated breast PET (dbPET) scanner designed to maximize visualization of posterior regions of the breast. BRPET uses prone imaging geometry and a 12-module detector ring built from pixelated LYSO crystals coupled to position sensitive photomultiplier tubes (PSPMTs). Optical coupling via slanted plastic fiber optic light guides permits partial insertion of the crystals into the exam table’s breast aperture. Image quality testing procedures were adapted from the NEMA NU4-2008 protocol. Two additional phantom tests quantified the posterior extent of the usable volume of view (VoV). BRPET axial, radial, and tangential FWHM spatial resolutions at the isocenter were 1.8, 1.7, and 1.9 mm, respectively. The peak absolute system sensitivity was 0.97% using an energy window of 460–562 keV. The peak noise equivalent counting rate was 5.33 kcps at 21.6 MBq. The scanner VoV extends to within ~6 mm of the plane defining the location of the chest wall. A pilot human study (n = 10) compared the diagnostic performance of FDG-BRPET to that of contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI), with biopsy as ground truth. Averaged over three expert human observers, the sensitivity/specificity for BRPET was 0.93/1.0, compared to 1.0/0.25 for CEMRI.

Technical Note: Performance evaluation of a small‐animal PET/CT system based on NEMA NU 4–2008 standards

The MetisTM PET/CT is a self-developed, silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) detector-based, rodent PET/CT system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the system using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 4-2008 standard protocol. Energy resolution, spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction (SF), noise-equivalent count rate (NECR), and image quality (IQ) characteristics were measured. A micro Derenzo phantom experiment was performed to evaluate the spatial resolution using three-dimensional ordered-subsets expectation maximization (3D-OSEM) and maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstructed images. In addition, the CT imaging agent Ioverol 350 was mixed with fluorine-18 (18 F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and then injected into the micro Derenzo phantom to evaluate the PET/CT imaging. In vivo PET/CT imaging studies were also conducted in a healthy mouse and rat using 18 F-FDG. The mean energy resolution of the system was 15.3%. The tangential resolution was 0.82mm full-width half-maximum (FWHM) at the center of the field of the view (FOV), and the radial and axial resolution were generally lower than 2.0mm FWHM. The spatial resolution was significantly improved when using 3D-OSEM, especially the axial FWHM could be improved by up to about 57%. The system absolute sensitivity was 7.7% and 6.8% for an energy window of 200-750 and 350-750keV respectively. The scatter fraction was 8.2% and 12.1% for the mouse- and rat-like phantom respectively. The peak NECR was 1343.72kcps at 69MBq and 640.32kcps at 53MBq for the mouse- and rat-like phantom respectively. The 1-mm fillable rod in the IQ phantom can be clearly observed. We can identify the 0.6-mm aperture of the micro Derenzo phantom image clearly using 3D-OSEM (10 subsets, 5 iterations). We also performed the fusion of the PET and CT images of the mouse and the brain imaging of the rat. The results show that the system has the characteristics of high-resolution, high-sensitivity, and excellent IQ and is suitable for rodent imaging-based research.